/biz/ - Business & Finance

shitcoin not needed

token. not. needed.
get it through your head

>>56015555
CHECKED

>>56015555
>>56015577
Oh yes I think it might, in fact, be happening

>>56015555
checked
it's clown world bro
just gotta learn to live with it

>Moroney

yeah,we live in a simulation

>>56015555
I like Eric but he is disgusting

>>56015555
>SWIFT has officially admitted that its tests with CCIP were very succesful
aaaand then Bitcoin did the thing

>>56015555
>>56015577
>>56015588
checked

>>56015555
How…. do people not see it

>>56015631
I just love the small pump before the reversal. It's like the people at the helm pressed the wrong button but caught it quick.

>>56015680
that "pump" is just knocking out overleveraged "sell the LINK news" bots.

>>56015555
WE ARE MANIACS

>>56015680
market makers know how to tricks goyim into fomo longing tops

>>56015555
Checked. Once we break above $10 again I will start feeling optimistic, but this range has been soul crushing for the past 15 months

>>56015680
yeah that's basic market manipulation shit. small pump before big dump

>>56015786
I don’t care about anything until it’s about $12.65. I remember when we finally broke that level and I would have sworn we would never go back. Now less than half of it.

>>56015555
also a representative from hong kong's treadury will be attending, shortly after sergey talked about how he would be going around asia to speak to banks

>>56015555
you ever wonder why biz is literally the only place on the entire internet that even notices and discusses these things? I mean all the shadow power struggles behind the scenes with all the vcs and kikes like jump blacklisting link from the crypto press because they all bought into competitors and shit like that?

>>56016182
Because we are smart people

>>56016026
Soon brother. Soon. Just keep accumulating and ignore the fucking fuddies

>>56016202
WHEN

>>56015555
>chainlink helps SWIFT save a lot of money in operating costs
...and the LINK mcap will be equal to the amount of value it saves, which will be billions. Problem is that LINK is already worth billions and crypto is high risk, so the risk reward isn't worth it.

>>56015555
srs question

keep dumping my paycheck into btc or finally try to complete the link make it stack?
for reference on my current stats
BTC 2.2
LINK 4500

t. 28yrs old, no debt, how do i make it?

good for chainlink labs, irrelevant for soon to be phased out token holders

>>56016344
Good news is you’ll make it with that link stack. Bad news is your gonna be mid 30’s

>>56016355
checked

not what I wanted to hear tho :(

>>56015555
Checked in niggerman won't be helping us this timepilled

>>56016344
go all in link
stacking BTC is so 2017

>>56015631
Literally just a bitcoin bart if you zoomed out from 15m candles lmao. In fact you intentionally seem to have started immediately post the pump.

>>56015555
>admitted tests were very successful
haha
>we really tried to keep this on the down low, but we actually didn't just throw money into the bottomless crypto pit, in fact we are very smart and successful. but don't tell anyone, it might ruin our image as a loser company that we want to project

>>56016191
There was a couple of smart people that could dumb it down for the retarded plebs like me to understand, most of us were just in the right place at the right time.

>>56016432
It’s that bell curve meme for all intents and purposes we are smart

>>56015615
That yellow beast looks worried

>>56016406
>i don't spend all day, every day thinking about Chainlink

>>56016501
>ugh, another anon realized that the shill talking points make no sense. i'll try deflecting, maybe nobody will notice that i have no arguments
you have no arguments

>>56015555
How much did Chainlink pay these guys to speak at SmartCon?

>>56016026
I remember that too. Looking back, that period was just a blink of an eye compared to how long we have been crabbing since...

Checked.

>>56016527
>actually, i do spend all day, every day thinking about Chainlink. I'm going slightly mad and i know i'm acting like a cunt but i'm so used to it now i think i've become the cunt

>>56016612
it's perfectly fine to have no arguments to support your position, many scam victims experience that frustration. but try not getting so angry about it, it's the weekend

>>56016637
Hey it's Mr 'You're angry' again! I love this guy, he's such a great conversationalist

>>56016388
>Bitcoin had just pumped, that’s why!
>Bitcoin had just dumped, that’s why!
>Bitcoin had just been crabbing, that’s why!

You have no idea how many times we’ve seen this cope, and in how many varieties.
Fact is Bitcoin took a big sloppy grampa dump immediately after Link news.
Again.
Either get that or a bullet through your thick skull.

>>56016743
if there are multiple sources telling you to not get attached to your positions, maybe you should take that advice. getting emotional because of a bad investment is normal, but when you lash out like this, it's not healthy

>>56015555
You guys put the weirdest string of dots together. And it sound like bullshit but I believe it.
How about using that effort on a coin called Blackswan. Check it out at blackswan dot biz

I like how they don't even try to justify the token not needed critique, it's pure blind copium. Pseuds think they can just get rich by association with zog but they're being cucked the hardest.

Sad, but it's a doggy dog world out there and I honestly don't believe people who can't read in 2023 deserve to hold any significant amount of capital

Best alpha on the thread is Blackswan frfr

>>56016271
By Q2 2024 my prediction is the price will be above $25 and by Q4 2024 the price should be above $70 on fundamentals alone. Speculation would make these as much as 4x higher

>>56016986
Zero chance on any of that happening. To anyone new, do not fall for this blind faith bullshit. Getting emotionally attached to an investment typically results in financial disaster

>>56015555
chainlink has no product, its all tweets and blogposts. must suck to be a retard.

>>56017034
investing in chainlink now is the exact opposite of being emotional though. sentiment is super poor, so anyone investing now must be using intellect rather than emotion

>>56015555
the pa is annoying but who really cares if we get swift confirmed and into production (which is looking increasingly likely)
with proper adoption we are going to be very very rich

>>56016822
Checked but when the multiple sources are one unhinged dude from denmark with a porn addiction its really hard to take him seriously

>>56016986
>Ccip and staking released
>only 40% up from ath
This shit sucks. Why would I buy chainlink? Btc and eth did at least 4x

>>56017195
you're replying to a "person" with no intellect, anon. LINK is a great buy currently if you have more than 2 brain cells to rub together.

>>56015575
>OOFEEEFFEE CO

>>56016026
I always thought we'd have a 90%+ crash during the bull market because everything up until now is just speculation.
When people in my life asked about crypto during the mania phase, I always told them not to buy, but if they did, wait until the next crash.

That said, it isn't fun holding throughout all this.
Luckily, I was able to double my stack under $10, but it still is baffling that there hasn't been any news able to pump the price past $9.

I see it both ways.
The fudders have a point that there isn't anything that would pump the price right now because CCIP and staking are both extremely limited right now.
On the other hand, it seems like we don't go a single day without Chainlink announcing some type of news that is going to pump the price $50 at some point in the future.
The pressure is building, and it's just going to take that one little trigger for the price action to go absolutely batshit insane.
Buying at $6 in Sept 2023 is an absolute once in a generation opportunity.

>>56015555
They will just attend over zoom like SBF did last year.

>>56015555
Price will dump during the conference.

Sir Gay is taking Dahlia to Sibos. Sir Gay never took Ari to Sibos. Ari wrote an entire book length incel manifesto in revenge for this I bet.

>>56016835
>>56016981
You guys aren’t slick

Link was overvalued because of tokenomics. Lets say you understand the value of a product x and at that point there is only a small amount in existence. The value might be billions so ppl put billions in and fight for x tokens. Now the value is fixed, its not gonna grow but the amount of shares is..what will happen to the token value? It will adapt to the available supply in circulation and the demand. The only way to save chainlink is locking away most of the supply but why do that? Where do the rewards come from? If you make more money holding link than using it you will not find a healthy economy. You need Inflation for it to work which counters the value proposition of link tokens. The network aims to be effecient, cheaper and better than previous systems.

Still stacking, never selling. Nolinkers will cope.

>>56019271
we really are back in 2018 with retarded posts like this
staked link is collateral retard
the payment mechanism can be abstracted away in usd or whatever you like

>>56015555
>tokenize the world's assets
This is neither desirable nor adds greater utility to the current system and the burden of proof is on STINK holders to prove me wrong

>>56019336
Suck my dick

>>56019322
>staked link is collateral retard
>the payment mechanism can be abstracted away in usd or whatever you like
For that matter why bother with LINK at all? Why not just set up a different decentralized architecture using ETH or USDC for "collateral" if you need to run nodes? Why not just modify the CCIP protocol to use ETH or whatever base layer token of the chains you're communicating between?

You realized you just tanked the value case for your token with this argument, right, dumb fuck?

>>56015555
do i need to buy more or is my 7k staked LINK enough to hit 10mm by 2030?

>>56015555
2 guy going on vacations paid by LINK holders. That s how this kind of conference work anon. Sorry

>>56019416
the dude has temu and google ads on his personal website KEK https://laurencemoroney.com/posts/nofear/

>>56019384
wow retard i don't know... maybe because it would be helpful to have a single asset to coordinate across a network across what will be hundreds or thousands of blockchains?
it's unbelievable how fucking stupid people on this board are now
one of the twitter emigres did a decent article four years ago to break it down into pieces for you:
https://the-crypto-oracle.medium.com/the-seven-requirements-for-a-viable-decentralized-oracle-network-e634710ea11f

>>56019300
nice pic
nice dubs
very optimistic about the future WAGMI

>>56019448
>bro trust me, the token is very much needed dude, look, an ancient article made from a paid chainlink advocate says so!
the absolute state of bagholders

>>56016295
>and the LINK mcap will be equal to the amount of value it saves, which will be billions
SWIFT's revenue (REVENUE, not profit) is less than $1bn, their total operating expenses is something like $900m (that's million with an 'm')

>>56016769
Keep crying stinkie, one day ser gay will be out of link to dump on you

>>56019384
Because, node operators being paid in LINK means they are incentivised to do a good job to make the LINK token worth something. If they do a bad job nobody will use Chainlink and the token value will drop to 0, thus reducing how much value the node operators accumulate.
So the success of their income is tied to auccess of the token is tied to success of the network is tied to success of the node operators doing their job.
If they're paid in ETH, or whatever other shitcoin you suggest, that dimension of incentive disappears reducing network security. Fuck you, retard. Why are we still dealing with obsolete 2018 fud?

>>56019876
Just to follow this up, being paid im Eth or whatever would still work someqhat, it's just that it introduces additional attack vectors and this is LESS SECURE than using a native oracle token.
Chainlimk unlike other shit projects has NOT COMPROMISED on SECURITY. Because an oracle network without security is less than worthless (it's negative value because they'l lose people money through exploits).

>>56015555
>A Multibillionaire/former CEO of Google/Bilderberg member will take an 8-hour flight to another continent in order to attend a conference in person and he's taking Google's top AI expert with him
But remember folks, YOU are the one killing the planet with your damn lightbulbs and car.

>>56019818
yeah dood let's just use mev infested eth as our collateral or usdc which just depegged a few months ago
the banks that cll are working with will just love that

>>56019942
this. these people want you losing money. they think its funny

>>56019858
Never go full retard

>>56015555
IMAGINE buying soda cans of Coca Cola and thinking you are going to be owed profits or gains from the growth of the Coca Cola Company.

Lol
Lmao even.

>>56020110
If there would only ever be 1 billion coca colas and owning them would entitle me to dividends from coca colas earnings and subsidiaries of Coca Cola would pass on a portion of their business to me and Coca Cola cans are used as collateral by coca cola’s service providers to guarantee quality service, I’d buy every Coca Cola I could get my hands on holy shit what kind of retarded fud is this

>>56020399
>owning them would entitle me to dividends from coca colas earnings
so it's unrelated to how link works? it's just used to fund development, you have to look past the marketing or you'll fall for every scheme. use this as a learning opportunity, the money is lost anyway

There is literally nothing like an AI
The marketing faggotery got out of control

>>56019336
>tokenizing the world's assets is neither desirable nor adds greater utility to the current system
>and the burden of proof is on STINK holders to prove me wrong

It really, really isn't though.

>>56020473
>offers the prospect
so why, after a decade, are the only tokenized assets borderline scams? the weasel words are intentional, they want to be part of the discussion and sound profound, but it's telling that they don't list any successful projects of scale

>>56020531
Sounds like crypto is a dead end huh? Better sell, go away, and never look back.

>>56020110
Cans of coke are the end product of the Coca Cola company, which invests huge resources in producing, marketing, and distributing them. If you own a portion of the Coca Cola company (represented by stock equity) then you are entitled to a portion of profits. All other things being equal (mostly macro conditions and recognition of the facts of the business), if the company does a good job and more people want to own a slice of the pie, the price of equity will go up.

The product of the Chainlink network is secure data and trust-minimized communication. Network participants (CLL developers, node operators) invest significant resources into the production of these deliverables. If you own a portion of the Chainlink network (represented by the LINK token) then you are entitled to a portion of the network's profit.

>>56020537
tokenizing already virtual assets is not the entirety of crypto. cherry picking marketing material to feed your confirmation bias is just peak retail behavior, it's a bit embarrassing. blackrock isn't trying to peddle their token at least, they know about regulations

>>56020551
>portion of the Chainlink network (represented by the LINK token)
lol, good one anon

>>56020551
Wait, so you're saying LINK is an illegal, unregistered security?

>>56020074
>chainlink helps SWIFT save a lot of money in operating costs...and the LINK mcap will be equal to the amount of value it saves
SWIFT's operating costs are about $900m, so the maximum possible savings are far less than $900m. Cry, seethe, dilate.

>>56020576
you could make that argument relatively convincingly, what with the ICO and all. but it literally doesn't matter, because Chainlink has successfully carried out the best kind of regulatory capture possible: the type that no one notices. Point me to a single SEC publication that names LINK as a potential security. They've named at least 50 tokens, so you should be able to find me one that names LINK, right? Chainlink has been working hand-in-hand "for a decade" with the world banking cartel. Swift is not going to let one temporary anti-crypto SEC commissioner get in the way of their continued relevance and existence. They need to update their messaging systems to survive. Banks need to introduce new revenue streams before they get regulated into non-profitability by governments backed into a corner by their own debt obligations.

>>56020565
Are you saying that there is another form of equity ownership of the Chainlink network?

>>56020561
>tokenizing already virtual assets is not the entirety of crypto
1) big fat strawman, nobody claimed that
2) tokenizing "already virtual assets" represents 16 times the current total crypto market cap within the first decade, according to financial institutions today

>>56020591
>SWIFT's operating costs
Swift is a collective of 11k banks. What are the total operating costs of these 11k banks?

>>56020596
>SWIFT's operating costs
saw this fud yesterday. probably same guy but he seems fond of it. they're getting so desperate now kek

>>56020594
>Are you saying that there is another form of equity ownership of the Chainlink network?
i'm saying that there is none. the token is a glorified "i donated" badge. you give them money in exchange for nothing

>>56021220
You're not even vaguely in the same league as the guy you've picked to fud with. it's a pleasure watching him dismantle your seething fud with ease. please... keep going, i'm loving it

>>56021233
you forgot to include an argument. seems like a funding token is not equity after all, as expected

>>56021589
>funding token
You mean like Bitcoin?
Did you know that even today 98% of miner rewards come from Satoshi’s inflationary stash which he created out of thin air back in 2009 to bootstrap his coin?

Even after halving these bootstrapping rewards three times!

>>56021612
>stale whataboutism
how is a different project at all relevant when discussing the funding mechanism of another? if it's hard for you to stay on topic even in asynchronous conversations like these, maybe you need to get checked for adhd

>>56021642
>whataboutism
That’s not what that is.

>>56016191
I did a poopie and its stinky just wanted to let you know :)

>>56015555
proofings?

>>56021646
>n-not a funding token, w-what about bitcoin

>argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

you learned something today, i'm happy i could assist you

>>56019336
97% of institutional investors disagree
source: swift

>>56021702
If your accusations against Chainlink apply equally to Bitcoin and 99% of crypto, then your argument is really “Chainlink bad because crypto bad”.

>>56021714
so you agree, it's whataboutism. that's a good first step. the next part requires a bit of logical thinking: what organization premined the entire bitcoin supply and is now selling it to fund development (and the bitcoin human resources department)? if there is none, you have to agree that it's not only whataboutism, it's also nonsense

>>56015575
how can I invest in oofeeeffee coin

>>56021755
>all of crypto bad
>but if you mention any crypto other than Link I will get angry

>>56021777
you don't have to get angry though, it's just money. you can bounce back from this

>>56021784
>you don't have to get angry
t. 14 posts over 20 hours

>>56016550
Yes. The BTC dumps on Link news shows that whales do not want the common man to understand Chainlink. It'll keep crabbing upward until it takes off then
>of course goy chainlink is wonderful
>>56017084
what are price feeds

>>56021233
You know youve lost an argument when your answer was “dude this was already debunked so long ago”… culties are very fond of this route. Theyve been saying it since 2017, back when Swift “testing” started.

>>56021702
LOL. Insane linkie logic…”our coin should moon because bitcoin mooned even though it was the first coin a decade ago”

It’s like a little kid telling his parents “it’s not fair”

>>56021798
Another sign youve lost an argument is when you become obsessed about the emotional state of the other person in an attempt to discredit them. Extremeley elementary tactic and a diversion from the topic at hand

Lol this fuddie is so angry he had to posts 3 times in a row.

>>56019876
>>56019910
This is about as simple of an explanation/rebuttal for the whole “token not needed” slop I’ve seen. Bravo.

What you have to realize though is how insanely retarded most people are when it comes to understanding even a cursory level of what CL is trying to achieve.

Most of the popular cryptos only requires the understanding of 1 concept, maybe 2.
>You can pay people with BTC, LTC, BCH
>You can write a smart contract with ETH, ADA, AVAX, etc
never mind that most people have no clue what a smart contract is or does
>Doge, Shib, Fuckicoin tO ThE MoON

Now try to explain what Chainlink is and how the Link token works. You have to know the basics of how BTC/stables and the L1s work along with the issues that hold them back from global adoption.
That’s a tall ask for the average person, so we tell them,
>Link brings real world data to the blockchain

From there, these dopes think they’re slick and say
>why do they need a token?
>why can’t they just be paid in (whatever they hold)

Now if you want to explain how the Link token is necessary to these people, you have to walk them through everything we’ve spent years figuring out, making sure you’re dumbing it down enough.

Why bother with that when retail is never going to drive the adoption that will result in the price action we’re waiting for?


That’s why you see nothing but “token not needed” and other low level fud being unanswered around here.
It’s not worth it to engage these people, but every once in a while someone is able to explain it in Reddit terms, which is thoroughly ignored because above all, these people cling to their presuppositions that are the foundations of their ego.

Nothing to add and don’t want to dilute the nectar being spread here, just recognizing some of the best posts I’ve read regarding chainlink recently.
Godspeed anons, hope my 1k will be enough to afford a house.

>muh token is needed cause node operators are getting paid with it
literally wtf are you baboons talking about, nodes literally market dump their "payment" to cover for operating costs
it remains worthless, and even if it drops in value, remember what the link shills have been spamming for 6 years:
>18 dEcImAlS!!11!!1
it doesn't fucking matter of it costs $0.001 or $1, nodes still get the same amount in dollars regardless
the token is demonstrably and provably NOT NEEDED at ALL until the slob implements actual fucking staking
fuck you all retard shills

>>56022266
real staking has never been tried

>>56022073
I think there's another influence that contributes to the brain dead rhetoric we see not just on /biz/, but everywhere at this point. For reference, /biz/ in 2018 was a very special place. It was a bear market, but it was so fundamentally different to the one we're in now. Back then most people got wiped out and fucked off from crypto. Meanwhile LINK had just launched in late 2017 and we had a very dedicated community of /biz/ autists picking LINK apart and there were really great arguments back then. Of course there was retarded shit, but it doesn't even compare to how bad it is now. The amount of high-quality posters was unbelievable compared to today.

The collective IQ on /biz/ has taken a nosedive since 2018 as we're overrun with third world scammers and zoomers. With zoomers in particular I'm pretty sure their tendency of completely frying their attention span means that it'll be impossible for them to comprehend LINK. Most of these retards barely understand what Bitcoin is. Forget about Ethereum and don't even think about Chainlink. As time goes on I take the concerns of a competency crisis more and more seriously. It really feels like there's less and less smart people growing up in the world and we're living in a society that is deliberately cultivating new generations to be complete fucking retards.

>>56022266
>nodes literally market dump their "payment" to cover for operating costs
You mean like Bitcoin miners?

>>56022363
yes for operating costs. chainlink hires dozens of roasties that have zero value and get paid $100-200k. if youre so inclined to this idea go ahead and give away some of your own money to the next hot chick you see. try thinking a little harder tomorrow .

>>56022399
>yes for operating costs
Yes. Exactlly like Bitcoin.

>>56015555
Checked

>>56022399
can you point to even 1 HR roastie making 6 figures because I'm pretty sure you can't

>>56019300
he got suspiciously nervous when lex fridman asked him if he was satoshi

>>56022405
yes cause bitcoin has conference about woman in blockchain for diversity needs. fuck off shil
l>>56022415
lol newfag anyone have the chainlink roastie and salaey picture?

>>56022598
>yes cause bitcoin has conference about woman in blockchain for diversity needs
That's Chainlink, not the nodes.

>>56022598
>anyone have the chainlink roastie and salaey picture?
That picture is the only "source" of the $300k HR roastie meme, which someone just made up

>>56015680
*I just love the smell of small pump in the morning before the reversal. It's like the people at the helm pressed the wrong button but caught it quick.

>>56022598
she probably makes 75k max

>>56022030
>you can't post "x" times or else y you're mad

the chart tho son

>>56022334
>le secret investment
>literally the only coin in the top 100 to have it's own bear market in the '21 bull run that's still going on today

the irony that linkies still think they're some kind of genius for being in a secret cult is hilarious

>>56023955
>they always leave out the fact that link had its own private 2020 bullrun
curious

>>56022073
>Now if you want to explain how the Link token is necessary to these people

how else are they going to raise billions for their first class lifestyle? That money has to come from somewhere so thank god all of you donated. Hence the term, Chainlink... PAY UP

>Why bother with that when retail is never going to drive the adoption that will result in the price action we’re waiting for?

you'll still be here 6 from now (after missing another bullrun) trying to convince people le big banks are buying in imminently. Meanwhile the business word will continue to run as it always has, not needing random altcoins in any way, shape or form.


>these people cling to their presuppositions that are the foundations of their ego

lol linkies have the lowest form of self awareness I've ever seen. You guys had to create an entire conspiracy theory to cope with the fact that you missed the '21 bullrun. And are still tripling down on le secret investment theory. It is going to get so ugly by mid '25 once more of the cult realizes it isn't happening.

>>56016191
Yikes

>>56023976
yeah link had its one and done altcoin pump 3 years ago. So what? Thousands of other coins did that, and now they're dead.

>>56024013
Why not sell and move on?
Why spend all this time and effort writing these elaborate posts about a coin you think is a scam?

>>56024063
being turned into the lolcow of biz has been absolutely humiliating for him
he's also extremely stupid so instead of just flying under the radar or coming up with a new persona he just doubles down even though ive seen his address posted a couple times on here the last few days

>>56018111
checkerino'd

>>56015555
Checked!
Unfortunately I won't be there in person because I am still poor.
It seems I am fated to never go to the SmartCon in my life even after making it.

>>56015575
I recognize that coffee!

>>56015577
As a current linkie accepting his fate.

This could be the truth

>>56015555
Oh my cunting fuck boys
Look at the digits
Also I apparently missed this event (attention has ventured in recent years given shit price action but haven't yet sold a single stinky)

My problem is I just don't see price action in the next 2 years. If anyone wants to share their hopium feel free.

>>56017956
>Buying at $6 in Sept 2023 is an absolute once in a generation opportunity.
Sadly I’ve come to terms with the fact I won’t make it from this bull run, but even a return to 50 would change my life permanently

>>56021991
>>56022004
>>56022010
Hahaha >>56021798 made you switch IDs. You have no argument, youre literally stringing together words and pretending that it has any bearing on the actual situation. You have a fundamental lack of understanding of what you try to FUD. You are peak retard and you should ask to get put on a different assignment or just find a new line of work.
>muh staking doesnt entitle a share of revenue
Even the fake staking now gives a share of the premined tokens. The real deal will be exactly like anon described when deconstructing to goofy coke can fud that some mental toddler came up with and spams in these threads like macaroni art he is proud of. Do better.

>>56019412
play your cards right with the BUILD rewards and you'll be good

>>56015555
woww an 8 hour flight? this. is. HUGE!!

>>56030448
8 hour flights are no joke. your butt can get sore, especially if you're older

>>56015555
>A billion dollar corporation sends logistics, marketing, and their head honchos all over the world
>They work out of every country on the planet and fund thousands of high profile sports teams
>Is already more drank than water itself
>A can is still only a couple dollars
Wtf bros I'm literally going insane. My sui stack is just sitting in my garage doing nothing. My wife is starting to ask why I have 7k cans sitting around doing nothing. I've tried to explain to her that there are people at SWIFT drinking coke right now but she still says I'm an idiot for thinking this will eventually moon. It's like she doesn't even get that when eventually someone does in fact buy everyone in the world a Coke were going to be fucking rich.

>>56030479
cool FUD idea but poor execution

>>56030725
How about the chart tho

>>56030479
The sui stacks was always 10k cans, or 1 full pallet. If you don't have at least 1 pallet of coke in your garage, you are simply ngmi. I have 3 and even I'm worried that won't be enough. Although once staking is released I should be netting around 1k cans/year.

>>56020591
Are you really that stupid?

It isn't about SWIFT, it's about the adoption of LINK by the banks that SWIFT represents.

Fuck me, go back to eating your crayons you stupid fucker.

>>56019300
Thanks for posting this anon. I’ve never heard this theory before. I’ve spent the day going down this rabbit hole. I’m now convinced Sergey is Satoshi.

>>56034876
If Sir Gay is Satoshi that means that LINK will be subsidized for another hundred years or more just like BTC, checkmate fuddie

>>56015575
imagine they put you in the looney bin, and feed you ai pictures as rorschach tests and if you say that you see pepe, they tell you you're schizo.
just imagine

>>56017084
It's an oracle fucktard. Think of what they do.
Just like Supraoracle helping smart contracts with fast and reliable feeds.

>>56021703
>MUH SWWAAAAAAAAAAFT
Can't wait to see the looks on your loser faces when Swift announces it has "decided to end its trials with Chainlink and CCIP integration and hopes for more productive opportunities to work with the Chainlink team in the future!"
The cope will be massive
>>56020473
>Muh institutional opinion
Surveys don't count for shit, it's well known self-reporting is one of the most flawed ways to gather data
>>56020537
BTC is not a scam and has institutional adoption. ETH and Solana are already being used by Visa for cross-border settlements, no STINK required

>>56038090
>t.

>>56038102
The kid in this picture is better looking than you and gets more pussy than you do :)

>>56015555
>hoping boomers will save you

>>56038109
You actually aren’t terribly looking Adem. Too bad you waste your potential being a retarded coomer.

>>56038137
>he saves pictures of "fudders" on his phone
>he even compliments their looks
dude, you might be gay

>>56015555
The paid fud is very bullish.

https://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=6837&mn=1077&pt=msg&mid=22723287

>>56038182
You can switch ID’s all you want Adem. It’s time for you to move on with your life.

>>56038109
Close your mouth when you're breathing, retard.