[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 224 KB, 1080x1660, Screenshot_20230901-184636.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56005025 No.56005025 [Reply] [Original]

Why haven't we gone lower?
What's going on?
There is a stupid uptrend

>> No.56005059
File: 185 KB, 881x661, market.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56005059

>Return to "normal"
there's a time to be bullish but greedy moonbois never learn
>Verification not required.

>> No.56005069
File: 137 KB, 960x802, 1645143668069.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56005069

>>56005025
Retesting the downtrend before breaking the lows
there was zero bullish activity following the last news pump
ill invoice you for my analysis

>> No.56005093

>>56005025

39 what was cold soon warms, and warmth soon cools.
So moisture dries, and dry things drown.

40 what was scattered gathers
what was gathered blows apart

41 the river where you set your foot just now is gone --
those waters giving way to this,
now this

>> No.56005104

>>56005093
69 the way up is the way back

70 the beginning is the end

>> No.56005363

>>56005025
third world retards buying in then roping, cursing white people on the way out

>> No.56005381

>>56005059
What's so stupid about this graphic is that the 'mean' here is totally off and unrealistic. But don't expect /biz/lets to ever verify a chart themselves.

>> No.56005398

The only point of that dump was to snuff the latest Chainlink news.
The ETF delay and the Chainlink news were timed to line up, just like the previous Chainlink news was timed to line up with the Binance and Coinbase lawsuit fud.
I am convinced that the Chainlink team and the SEC are in on it together, and the idea is to have a paper trail of bullish information they can point back to and say "see, we had all these announcements!" so they can gaslight people in the future that they had "plenty of opportunity to buy" even though, in reality, they artificially and intentionally kept sentiment and public understanding as low as possible.

>> No.56005406

>>56005025
>Why haven't we gone lower?
People and corporations buy the dip.

>> No.56005457

>>56005069
What news? I think I missed it

>> No.56005470

>>56005406
Can somebody stop them?

>> No.56007382

retards (traders) opening 100x longs so they can donate to CZs BNB recovery fund

if you take leverage out, BTC would be < 10k easily, maybe < 5k

>> No.56007593

26ishk stablecoin

>> No.56008486
File: 31 KB, 680x439, 3b5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56008486

How are you guys so certain it will drop again?

>> No.56008518

>>56005398
>muh announcement of an announcement of the preliminary upcoming beta phase of the latest experimental round of alpha testing was snuffed by ETF getting rejected!
linkies unironically believe their vaporware "news" are more important than a fucking BTC ETF or even the entire fucking macro
mental illness

>> No.56008522
File: 125 KB, 1413x687, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56008522

>>56005398
>I am convinced that the Chainlink team and the SEC are in on it together, and the idea is to have a paper trail of bullish information they can point back to and say "see, we had all these announcements!" so they can gaslight people in the future that they had "plenty of opportunity to buy" even though, in reality, they artificially and intentionally kept sentiment and public understanding as low as possible.
What makes you think that? Sentiment is crypto for the normies are already dismal at best. Chainlink has to do an eye watering pump like the Summer of 2020 from $3 to $20. It can't be gradual like a rising 45° that you see in the other charts otherwise normies WILL catch on. It has to pull what XRP did in July or what BTC did a few days ago and it needs to be vertical and even then it would still on the news. with people trying to catch a ride on moonshot. Looking at charts for the year, it's so fucking erratic compared to other charts.

>> No.56008525
File: 108 KB, 1403x692, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
56008525

>>56008522
>>56005398
it is odd however, that it feels like it's being kept in range. Look at this chart, +/- $1 of $7

>> No.56008526

WEEKENDS ARE DEAD, MONDAY WE DUMP TO 24.7K

>> No.56010066

Why aren't we dumping?