/biz/ - Business & Finance

NPC. NO PAYING CUSTOMERS

>>55936479
>What features are we expecting?
dump from $6 to $4.2

>>55936479
Wait what? Do we get to add more if we choose? If retards withdraw? How didn't I hear about this yet?

>>55936479
>The next version of Chainlink Staking (v0.2) is currently on-track to launch this year, at which point v0.1 stakers can unlock or migrate their stake and LINK rewards. Staking v0.2 will feature various upgrades, such as greater flexibility around lockups and LINK rewards, improved security guarantees, and a more modular architecture that enables new functionalities to continue being added in a more iterative manner.

tl;dr: stake, unlock, and migrate, followed by -0.8%.

No slashing until v1 so stakechads are still just making easy money with no risk as long as they are willing to make an alert on short notice, and I'm always ready.

>>55936479

A new dumping feature

>>55936479
Lots of fudders desperate for replies

Is it really going to take 10 years to get to v1?

>>55936510
WOW it might release THIS year????

Remember when their original plan was two years until 1.0, everyone complained, so they just made two respective years of test versions? Literally the exact same thing, just trying to put lipstick on a pig. That just shows how stupid they think the cult is

Why seethe, bro? Just build your own Fourth Industrial Revolution, and build it as fast as you want.

The LC feature, you'll find out in two weeks after the audit has taken place, that's all I can say ;)

>>55936479
based. 6 hours until release

>>55938479
>6 hours until release
release what, you illiterate bagholder?

>>55938493
6 hours until we can read the code ranjesh

>>55938493
the code for staking v0.2, nigger

>>55936479
NPC. NO PAYING CUSTOMERS.

>What features are we expecting?
chart

Will I finally be able to fit my tiny little 600 Link stake into the tight wet pool?

who remembers:
>Announcing a Crowdsourced Audit of Chainlink Staking v0.1 on Code4rena
>November 1, 2022
>The competitive audit will begin on November 1 and continue until November 15, 2022
>The Chainlink Economics 2.0 Staking Protocol and Staking v0.1 Launch Details
>November 21, 2022
>Chainlink Staking v0.1 Early Access Is Now Live
>December 6, 2022
seems like we could get a staking v0.2 release at smartcon right?

Will we have to restake or will our stake be maintained in the pool automatically if we dont withdraw?

>>55938667
All it does is unlock staked tokens just so it can be dumped.

>>55938851
5 more hours to find out, in the code, what will be in it.

>>55936479
Why is the audit starting at 4pm on a Friday? Every normal person is done with work for the week and is going to spend the the last weekend of the summer relaxing with family or friends. Nobody will want to decipher the spaghetti code

>>55939109
>Every normal person
Since when are blockchain dev monkeys normal people?
In crypto bunch of kissless virgins regularly wait for releases, mints and presales in the most random times in the middle of the night mid week because of fucked timezones just for the slightest profit advantage.
Same with this, it doesn't matter if it's Christmas evening today the crypto dev monkeys will attack this audit the very second the code is out in the open because someone has to take the 250K USDC.

>>55936479
A button that auto withdraws all your link, sends to Binance and market sells

>>55939051
They already said what will be in v0.2 in one of their blogs

Is this the version where they increase the cap to 75M?

>>55939179
How do they determine who gets it

>>55939247
Read the How it works page on Code4arena.
Obviously the 250K USDC is spread to multiple auditors, all depending on how important/severe their findings in the code are.

>>55936479
Tentative penetration testing, followed by generous 2 month v0.1 soak testing, then in two months they will prepare to announce post audit staking v0.2 bug bounty

They had multiple code4rena audits for CCIP btw. Anyone expecting staking at smartcon is setting themselves up

>>55936479
>What features are we expecting?
i'm expecting a blog post with an image insinnuating that price will go up, whereas every staker lost money

>>55936479
my guess will be the only feature will be the ability to unstake.

cause lots of companies with 400 employees and billions in runways take 8 years to build a 2 line withdraw function

>>55939805
the only interesting point is if it will produce warnings on explorers again. they made the last minute attempt to save face even more embarrassing, but they probably learned their lesson to never promise anything and continue the glacial pace they are on

>>55939805
Yeah. Chainlink was super far behind on staking so they just whipped up something quick to appease link holders and will drag this out for 8 more years until full release, adding some stupid small feature that should have already existed from the beginning to give illusion progress is being made.
We go up 0.1 every year. It’s such a fkn joke. They better speed up the releases, like a new version every quarter or people will just get tired of holding

Never
Purchasing
Chainlink

Nice acronym fuddies. Ill be taking that and iterating upon it

IS SERGEY REALLY GOING TO OPEN THE POOL BEFORE WE GET OUR BUILD TOKENS?
IM NOT FUCKING SHARING REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>55940893
sorry stakie bro, i have 16k to stake i want airdrops

40 minutes until code reveal

>>55941235
pretty excited to see what's different

>>55941374
It must be HUGE
v0.1 to v0.2
Literally TWICE AS BIG numerically

>>55936512
>spam f5 on staking.chain.link hoping to notify a node is down and get a reward
>the actual nodes can just scrape data and make the notification automatically
You're doing nothing for the network, but the appearance that you can do something for it is critical.

>>55941615
lurk more

aside from unstaking im not seeing much of interest here. i thought we were getting v1 after v0.1 what the fuck happened man

>>55941653
>i thought we were getting v1 after v0.1
Why? We knew about v0.2 the moment the 9-12 month period was announced

Bros where is the link to the code

>>55941701
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-08-chainlink/tree/main/src

>>55938394
>revolution

What are you revolting against, being a faggot?

>>55941653
You got scammed

>>55938288

I think it's pretty obvious this releases at Smartcon.

Here's my take:

> Ability to withdraw
> Pool opens wider - first to existing stakers, then to everyone else if it doesn't fill (pro tip: it will)

MAYBE but probably not:

> First BUILD airdrops deployed
> APY is increased for people willing to lock up for longer periods.

>>55941881
BAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA

i guarantee you 1000% you arent getting a fucking cent of “airdrops” haahahah. You have to work for the team right? How delusional are you holy shit wake up bro

I'm a boomer and used MEW to create my wallet, didn't bother to stake on v0.1 but i want to get in v0.2. Do I really need to get a metamask wallet to stake or is there any other way?

>55941908
Im just not gonna do it (give you a (you)) i know I knowwwwwww Im sorry.
I’m just not gonna do it is all
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH

I hope the staking pool only opens for early stakers to stake more. The rest goes to nodes and big boys. Non-stakers will not get to stake ever again.

>>55941922
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-v0-2-overview/

Sadly It doesn't sound like the wallet cap is raised yet. I just want to stake 70k link and earn 10 a day

>>55936501
Immediately afterwards a green candle to $250 being the floor forever

>>55941920
basado drnr poster

Juicy details I've deciphered from the release, interesting for us early birds

>>55941920
youre such a pussy. You cant help responding because…I own you. Also…youre in a cult that scams you and proud of it. Chainlink…THE cuckolds of crypto

>>55941939
Nothing based about being a limpwristed cuck coward.

Now…onto more serious matters, are you guys just gonna look the other way while the team lied to you once again?

It's a wonderful day

>>55936479
How to extract more from baggies

so, anyone who gave it a lookie loo and knows their shit wanna spill the beans?

>>55936479
Current stakers will have priority access to migrate to v0.2. The priority access period lasts 7 days. After that, is Early access. Lastly, General access.

>>55936479
No BUILD rewards just yet bros. But they do seem to make a distiction between v0.1 and v0.2 stakers in regards to who gets how much of them when they are made available.

for sdl holders:
>More information regarding exact parameter details for v0.2 will be provided closer to its mainnet launch.
so have to see just how bullish it will be for us

Idk about you guys but its pretty funny denying vitriolic amd dishonest 3rd worlders their paycheck by not giving them (you)s

>>55936479
The rewards rate is a little bit confusing. There is supposed to be a total amount of staking rewards divided equally amongst everyone in the v0.2 pool. But nowhere do they mention what that total amount is.

>rewards based on user fees is planned to be in effect in future iterations of staking.

>>55941915
You should watch some videos explaining wallets and signing transactions. If you don’t know how this stuff work, you will get rekt. But to answer your question, you will want to either create a fresh wallet in meta mask and send your tokens from your MEW wallet to the Mets mask wallet, or access your mew from the meta ask. Both of these are rather unsafe and you will be 100x more safe by getting a hardware wallet

>>55942159
So if the rewards do not come from user fees yet, Chainlink must be subsidizing the rewards from its treasury, like in v0.1. Why do they not state what the total amount of rewards is?

>>55941936
If this pulls through investors would be rich anon. I'm holding a decent stash just incase, while getting positioned with DePINs which has shown innovation by tokenizing real infrastructure.

>>55942015
I’m gonna give you a you just this once to let you know I just bought $4,000 of Link.

>>55942036
You’re an angry elf.

>>55942285
>>55942414
>giving them (you)s
baka my head

>>55942285
serious question why does nobody ever post actual buy orders like this for any other crypto? shit even transactions on dexes if they're buying shitcoins? is this the only legitimate project int he space, besdies btc and eth? I see shill threads for other garbage here all the time, but NEVER buy orders/transactions.

>>55936479
I actually have $800 worth of Link in my Tap Fintech account and haven't checked it for a while. I don't like seeing my assets bleed in the app. Would staking Link help me earn more? What's the APY?

>>55939805
This is my fav cope in a long time

>>55942536
Do you realize how easy it is to fake a photoshop like that? The fact that link baggies appear to do it sometimes only speaks of their desperation to get rid of their bags on any victim they possibly can. Plus you have paid Chainlink advocates whose sole job it is to scour the internet for any discussion of link and make sure the sentiment is positive. Anything short of on-chain evidence is fake and gay.

>>55941908
Well, looks like you were wrong and I was right so

>>55942609
What tokens were you airdropped?

>>55942685
>what tokens were you airdropped for v0.2 staking which isn’t even out yet?

This board is peak retard. Fuck GME.

>>55942104
What the fuck is early access and general access, why they making it difficult again. I have 30k link on coinbase. Should I move it to 5 wallets to be able to stake?

>>55942743
stop giving obv paid fudders (you)s baka

>>55942754
Fuck off ape I have 61k link I already have 28k link staked. I'm worried now that I'm not gonna be able to stake my other 30k since this new type of early access I won't be prioritized. I plan to stake another 28k link minimum

kek fuddies

>>55942743
No. Keep it on coinbase. Seeing as how you are clearly new here, you are more likely to screw up sending to your own wallet. The coinbase team will help you stake them when the time is right.

>55942768
>read my incel manifesto
no i dont think i will.
they get paid by (you)s anon if we stop giving them (you)s they will leave.

i do not reply to the fud cucks. i want them to starve.

>>55942807
based.
>>55942768
this loser newfag hasn't kept up with the progrom baka. protip keep up with the progrom

>>55942587
nigger answer my question, I have seen numerous buy orders, I know what the fucking kraken screen looks like I've used it myself, if its so easy to fake where are the shills for the other shitcoins?

>>55942821
if you're new (pre 2019), you may not know this but chainlink is genuinely the unofficial board coin. Like 90% of people on here had a bag pre 2020 and it was all we discussed. Dont know about anymore, been a brutal crab/bear/accumulation/whatever cycle.

>>55938259
V1 comes out end of 2024

>>55942821
Other shitcoins actually appreciate in value. No need to fake screenshots and create fake positive sentiment. What are you a brainlet? Chainlink is a well known scam.

>>55942743
>>55942768
look into to SDL stake.link

>>55942849
holy fuck this is like shazaam/tortanic posting but for business and finance fuck you niggers

>>55942881
do you have no conscience? how can you recommend them after past betrayals? pathetic

>>55936479
Consistent -5.3% until you have to pay tether to keep your coins

>>55943021
Nothing personel kid. Sergey once said: If you're smart, you're gonna make it. If you're not, you're not gonna make it anyway.

I fully agree.

>>55942778
Chart tho. Your laugh is that of a clowns

>>55942807
I own you. You reply everytime I post. Not at’ing someone does nothing other than expose you as the nonconfrontational pussy you are, pussy

>>55943170
Serg made it (net worth $500m from scamming you), but you didnt. In other words, Serg is smart, you arent. But thats why hes the cult leader and youre just…his minion

>>55942837
it's still a chainlink board, you see it with bigger announcements, smartcon etc
in saying that many have left to greener pastures, many have fallen, many are fucked up from not selling any in last bull

>>55942743
You dipshit general access is how dumbasses like you (who leave their shit on exchanges) get in.

These are the top threads on /biz/ by reply count now that LINK doesn't "shit up the board" any more.
Nice to see all of the other crypto projects that people want to talk about, now that link threads aren't squeezing them out.

>>55943021
it's true, i had not been to /v/ in a while. it was shocking to see vitriolic fud between tendies and sony fans for example, as bad as anything you would see here. but here presumably everyone is acting towards some monetary incentive. do they just care that much about video games? is it actually just the exact same brand of mental illness, directed towards different subjects? i don't know.

the sandnigger scammer seems to be really riled up. what is the name of that scamshop he set up? the success factory? aren't the authorities looking into it? because i saw a couple comments online and it appears they reported it to the SEC.

whats the status on the scam? its going to be fun to go hunting

>>55942587
Haha get fucked faggot. Hope the 2 cents you get from this (you) is enough to buy rope.

>>55942807
lmao this one made that ESL fudnigger froth at the mouth
>GIVE ME A YOU SIR, YOU BLOODY PUSSY BASTERD BENCHOD
>PLS REDEEM SO THAT I CAN REDEEM THE YOU FOR 20c
>PLS SIRS MY 8 HOURS HERE A DAY CAN'T BE FOR NOTHING PLS

ok i just audited v0.2 it looks just fine where do i claim by 250,000? thanks
-ravindra indrajit mahendra mannan

>>55943362
dude stop giving them (you)s lmao

>>55943341
>still didn't provide onchain evidence

>b-b-but the CIA is going to know my middle name if i post my proof.

Like pottery.

>>55943562
goddamnit anon stop giving them (you)s haha

>>55942714
>>55942714
You suggested that person was wrong and you were right. I'm guessing on the topic of airdrops. How can you say you are right when you haven't received them?

When will we get the BUILD airdrops?

>>55945113
no date:
>Additional upgrades currently being worked on for Staking are new tools that enable BUILD projects to make Chainlink BUILD rewards available to stakers. We anticipate continued momentum around great teams joining the BUILD program over the coming months. The rollout of both user fee rewards and BUILD claiming tools within the Staking platform will be based on user fee volumes and BUILD participation continuing to accelerate and reaching high enough levels to meaningfully contribute to additional security for the network. More information around Chainlink BUILD rewards and eligibility for v0.2 stakers and historical v0.1 stakers is planned to be provided in the future.

>>55945113
Um, the team doesn't usually give timelines about expected releases, please just lock your tokens up again for another 12 months and if you try to unlock them we'll take your rewards. Thanks for subsidising DeFi and your huge salaries. We'll post another swag tiktok video soon, stay tuned!

>>55945147
this so much this fuddies in absolute disbelief

>>55945210
Thanks for the (You), I just got paid!

All this work and still no client willing to pay. Sad

Will the staking frontend allow us to export a spreadsheet of the time and amount received as Claimable Rewards?
Because I think receiving Claimable Rewards will be a taxable event, so we'll need to know the exact moment when it actually happens. Particularly if we're getting variable amounts with a high frequency.

I'm tempted to email Chainlink about this, because it could be a really important difference.

Hold up, are they loosening our cuckcages or are they tightening them?

>>55945367
Looking through the code audit it has some nice tables which have the kind of information I'll need, so it seems pretty likely that they'll make this information exportable. Or at the very least, it's tracked within the smart contract itself so it shouldn't be too hard to make some custom code to export it myself.

>>55936479
Serious question as It didnt was explicitly mention in blog post. To migrate for 0.2 do I need to have gas? Or they cover It?

>>55945413
Yes, you will need gas. Plan for a similar amount to your entry into v0.1, or double it to be sure.

>a-all buy screencaps are FAKED! Why? Because they just are, ok??
>NOBODY has that much money and I REFUSE to believe linkies are STILL buying, less so at these prices
Why does that picture make fudders so irrationally mad?
Its fun to see them squirming when their english comprenhension skills finally catch up to the fact that they have achieved the OPPOSITE of their goal (anons buying more instead of selling)
>just dox yourself and your transactions pussy
Yeah lmao no. We're going to keep on buying and you are going to keep on screaming impotently in the corner, shitskins :^)

>>55938288
the bitching was about ability to withdraw so they fixed the one thing causing the most ruckus

how do I get paid to FUD? sounds like a very comfy job, seeing how easy it is to trigger any remaining shills on this board

>>55942548
Why the risk and waste of time when GLW on MEXC is on a parabolic move, gaining +14 in 30mins? Even MESA and CRB too.

>>55945147
Literally says the tokens are unlockable at any time and withdrawn after a security period of a week or two. Kill yourself. You will never convince anyone to sell lmao.

>>55945736
>A week or two
I mean the example they give in the code audit is 180 days. It's really hard to say how long it will be.

>>55945736
Oooo you seem a little rattled there Linkie, thanks for the (You) though, I just got paid again.

>>55945796
bro srs stop giving them (you)s its how they get paid

I'M A STINKY LINKY I'M A STINKY LINKY

I REEK OF CIGARS AND HIGH CLASS JAPANESE WHORES

MY LINK STINKS AND SO DO I

>>55945367
>>55945402
taxed when you claim with a transaction

>>55942536
I also never seen anyone posting their shorts or sell transactions as well for link

>>55936479
just reviewed the code and my favorite feature is the one where the price goes down when any progress is made

>>55940040
Why would they care If people got tired of holding?

>>55936479

>>55936512
nigga on a 7k stake its only like 1500$ for the whole year. I wish i would have sold at fifty dollars and told sergey to go fuck him self

>>55946920
Daily reminder that this guy deletes his tweets. He shorted the bottom in the start of the last bullrun and kept saying we're going down.

>>55940040
>like a new version every quarter or people will just get tired of holding
they dont need us at this point. They have the money and the appearance of being a standard. The only thing we have as a "community" is to make them look like shit

>>55946068
Link FUD is a 50/50 split between paid agents and people trying o accumulate more at continuously lower prices

>t. used to be in latter category

>>55946972
>50 split between paid agents and people trying o accumulate more at continuously lower prices
nigger you had seven years to buy.

>>55946920
Daily reminder that this guy is brown.

NO PAYING CUSTOMER. That's not fud that's a fact

>>55946942
sorry, which guy? xo?

So.. $4 waiting room?

>>55946920
He is a corrupt narcissist who used his followers as exit liquidity for his failed trades to dump on them and shilled them scam coins as a paid shill.
Got all passive aggressive against Donalt when he talked of this.

>>55946942
I didn't know about this but...

>>55947855
I can't argue with this at all. His coke-fuelled incoherent homoerotic Twitter ramblings with his whole crew of chubby British "muslims" are especially pathetic. Absolute shitcunt who comes off spiritually bankrupt and generally miserable and unfulfilled.

He's been generally dead right on LINK though. Can you link the donalt exchange at all? I'm curious. Such a fat little brit.

alertors on strike!! join the union!!

>>55947855
>>55948359
Nvm was easy to find
Glad there are some who see that crew for what they are

Used a ledger to stake. I’m going to withdraw to Trezor and try to get into General Access I guess. No benefit to non-custodial staking when Ledger and glowies have custody of my wallet.

>>55936479
I'm expecting bonks.