/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55741876
Tron and BNB would be gone. Link and Arbitrum.

>>55741876
Whole shibarium ecosystem

I would keep BTC, ETH, BNB, SOL and add AVAX, ARB (When supply is at least 70% of the total supply) and maybe LINK

>>55741876
The top three would be BTC, ETH, and LINK.

>>55741876
BTC, ETH, USDT BNB, XRP, USDC, DOGE, ADA, SOL, TRON
The market is rational, no matter how much you chud out over it

>>55741876
Link in rank 3-4 right now.

>>55742104
(You)
>>55741936
Not Doge, XRP, or Cardano?

Adding LINK of course makes sense, ARB is a good suggestion. Not many people seem to have opinions on what to add though, just that there are too many shitcoins.

>>55741952
Actual mature answer for once

>>55741889
Hahahahahahahahahahaha

Fukin nigger. They rilled back the chain you dumb nigger. Its not a blockchain after that.

>>55742207
If I was gonna give my fantasy list, it'd be
BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, WBTC (or ideally NBTC), DAI, DOGE, LTC, XMR, BCH

>>55742399
Maybe swap BCH for PAXG actually

>>55741876
BSV, NEO, SHIB, HEX, EOS, CRV, SUSHI, APE, PNK, LBC

>>55741876
not considering stables

LINK
XMR
KDA
(these should be ^^ above BTC and ETH also)
DOGE

>>55741952
Honestly this is quite the first answer i see here with common sense.
Btc eth are here to stay.
Bnb is too big too fail ( it can but i mean that'd a disaster).
SOL is fully diluted, decentralized, fast, one of the best layer 1, secure and strong community and good project coming.
AVAX is really good and the multiple chains are very a plus but I dont like the fact that only 52% of the supply is on the market. But like you said after 70% thats a big yes.
Arb I dont like very much due to the hype but I never looked into it so I can't really tell....

Really a good choice on these !

>>55741876
i would say :

#1 BTC
#2 XMR
#3 ETH
#4 ADA
#5 LTC
#6 BCH

and it ends there, i can't think of any other actually decent asset.

maybe #7 DOGE

>>55741876
1. BTC
2. ETH
3. USDT
4. BNB
5. USDC
6. HBAR
7. AVAX
8. MATIC
9. DAI
10. LDO
11. ARB
12. OP
13. LINK
14. UNI
15. MKR

my portfolio desu

Just btc. Shitcoins not needed

>>55741876
1. LINK
2. XMR
3. BTC
4. ETH
5. DOGE
6. USDT
7. USDC
8. DAI
9. BUSD
10. WBTC

itt: retards counting stablecoins in the ranking

>>55744753
>AVAX is really good and the multiple chains are very a plus but I dont like the fact that only 52% of the supply is on the market. But like you said after 70% thats a big yes.

80% of the total supply is already circulating.

>>55741876
peepeepoopoo69asscoin inu

>>55744753
none of those coins will matter in 10 years.
>BTC
has huge problems with pool centralization, environmental footprint, lack of tail emission, and lack of any real smart contract functionality (ordinals are lame)
>ETH
a total disaster on both the consensus and programming environment fronts. imagine securing millions of dollars with some JavaScript code. how long has it been since the Curve hack? like a few days?
>BNB
will get rekt after Gary Gensler finishes off SBF, Mashinsky, Garlinghouse (that one’s FAR from over, SEC will appeal it), and turns his sights on CZ
>SOL
goes down every two weeks and literally requires their handful of node operators to all get on Discord afterward to coordinate a restart
>AVAX and ARB
nothing special about them, they are unregistered securities like all of the above except BTC

>>55741876
if thou knowest, thou knowest

>>55745122
Guide me please, been seeing this sexualized jesus allover biz today what tf is this about

>>55745136
his tighty-whities are pretty bussin ong
see picrel for more info

>>55745101
Nahh just check yo shit
>>55745120
Say what you want about BTC but If I had to choose one to be there in 10years thatd be it. You never gonna change my mind. Its the only one that cant be controled and people tend to forget that.
Everything else can be putted down but not btc.

>>55745120
>none of those coins will matter in 10 years.
>>BTC
>has huge problems with pool centralization, environmental footprint, lack of tail emission, and lack of any real smart contract functionality (ordinals are lame)
Basically none of this matters except for the lack of tail emissions. There's no demand for BTC smart contracts since ETH and others exist. There is demand for trading BTC in defi though.
>>ETH
>a total disaster on both the consensus and programming environment fronts. imagine securing millions of dollars with some JavaScript code. how long has it been since the Curve hack? like a few days?
Not a problem with ETH but a problem with shitty dapp code.
>>BNB
>will get rekt after Gary Gensler finishes off SBF, Mashinsky, Garlinghouse (that one’s FAR from over, SEC will appeal it), and turns his sights on CZ
Not happening. US has no power over Binance.
>>SOL
>goes down every two weeks and literally requires their handful of node operators to all get on Discord afterward to coordinate a restart
Agreed. SOL is a shitcoin.
>>AVAX and ARB
>nothing special about them, they are unregistered securities like all of the above except BTC
Gayxavv is definitely a scam. Arb is jewish but that means it'll pump.

>>55745179
https://token.unlocks.app/avalanche-2

>>55741876
1. XMR
2. XRD
3. MATIC
4. MASQ
5. NTX
6. SDEX
7. FOTON
8. ASTR
9. ETH
10. WBTC

>>55745179
Checked, It's 80%. Are you financial illiterate who can't differentiate total supply and fully diluted (meme) valuation? happen to many in this space.

desu always thought that projects with max supply should just switch to infinite supply because low IQ and midwits get filtered by the concept, Even tho the coins with max supply could/likely less inflationary. Fully diluted marketcap=Nonsense fud invented by coins with infinite supply. Only thing that matter for inflation/supply trajectory/real valuation are total supply+emission curve, That's it.

>>55745205
>Total locked
>Account for coins that don't exist, Theoretical max

It's dead wrong and i genuinely believe the people who run this site either have severe bagholder bias or worse, completely retarded and have no business running such site.

Let me explain to you simply:
X:
>has infinite supply
>emission rate of 5%
>Total supply (All tokens that already exist, either locked or unlocked ones, Excluding tokens that will come into existence on yearly basis by protocol inflation) is at 100% capacity (100M tokens for example)

Y:
>has max supply
>emission rate of 1%
>total supply at 100% (100M tokens), But max supply is theoretically double that

A site like the one you posted will make it appear like Y is more inflationary by showing Y "only" has 50% of its max supply in circulation, But in reality, In 10 years time, The total supply of X will grow by 63% while the total supply of Y will only grow by 10%. Like i said, The whole fully diluted metric is flawed, It simply can't be valid because coins with max supply are fudded by default against coins with infinite supply., And sites like the ones you posted doesn't help educating the masses about this fallacy. CMC does it too, They calculate FD valuation based on the "total supply" of coins with infinite supply (Meaning they don't account for protocol issuance) while they calculate the FD valuation of theoretically capped coins based on tokens that don't exist (Meaning they account of maximum protocol inflation that could ever occur). I don't think they're that stupid, They probably do this because it benefits BNB (A coin with 5% yearly protocol inflation).

>>55741876
BTC & ICP
Nothing else needed

>>55745487
I don't know enough and I'll check on that a few days and study a bit the subject. I'm relying on this website but i'll check by myself. Could change my mind

>>55741876
Bitcoin
Litecoin
Monero
Chainlink
ICP
HPOS10
Pregnant Butt
Grumpy Cat
Aleph Zero
Kleros PNK

1. DOT
2. DOT
3. DOT
4. DOT
5. DOT
6. DOT
7. DOT
8. DOT
9. DOT
10. ETH

>BTC
>ETH
>immense immeasurable power gap
>BNB
>SOL
>AVAX
>ARB
>OP
>XMR
>LINK
>DOGE

I'm sorry but your ghostchains with 0 users that only exist for the team/insiders to market dump tokens aren't going to make it

Arkham because in a sane world anonymity in crypto wouldn't be a thing and scammers/con men would be actively hunt down instead of allowed to walk away from their antics with 0 repercussion.
Ethereum because it is the only altcoin that brings any sort of value besides alternative payment options to the entirety of crypto.
Litecoin and Monero for fast transactions with low fees.

Everything else shouldn't even exist in the first place.

dogecoin would be in the top 500 at best.

>>55741955
>

>>55746006
But bitcoin itself was created with anonymity at its core. Yes wallets are a thing and always have been but they don't have your name/identity attached to them, that's the whole point.

>>55741889
>>55742371
not being ironic when i say i've never even heard about this shit, ever. that's sad considering i'm terminally online and currently day trading by swinging shitcoins around. how low is this chain, fren? damn

>>55744608
>>55744835
In a 'saner' world, you faggots would have bought something else entirely instead of buying obvious smoke screens.

>>55746006
Ethereum brings no value, privacy is at the core of crypto. Only monero, ethereum and bitcoin should exist, period.

>>55745120
>goes down every two weeks and literally requires their handful of node operators to all get on Discord afterward to coordinate a restart
Is that fucking real or are you shitposting? Because holy shit that's hilarious if true.

>>55745120
You do realize that if btc dies crypto is done for unironically, yes?

Mashinsky is done for btw see Arkham, Cointelegraph etc. He's in jail.

>>55746006
>>55746097
this is what arkm wants. do you really want to support it?

>>55745179
BTC can be subverted trivially by the top two mining pools. they hold 52% of hash power right now. it really is that simple.
https://m.btc.com/stats/pool
>>55746097
not true at all. there is nothing holy about BTC; it has first-mover advantage and isn’t a security, but that’s about it. i also don’t expect BTC to die overnight (with the possible exception of the tail emission problem; that could cause some real fireworks). but it will gradually lose ground to something that solves its major problems. and they are solvable.
i’m glad to hear that Mashinsky is in jail.
>>55746096
the “two weeks” part was hyperbole, but it’s happened many more times since this article:
https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2021/09/14/solana-validators-ready-potential-restart-amid-blockchain-outage

>>55741876
>ETH
>AVAX
>XMR
>DOT
>MATIC
>BTC
>BCH
>ROSE
>BNB
>ARB

>>55746052
Then you're new. Iota was big in 2017.

>>55746459
I like your lists and I want to believe they will be this way and some other young dude like LDO, PENDLE, or even PEPE will come flip most of them. I'll still. stick to my midcaps like INJ, CYMI, and CTSI.

>>55741876
I expect to see NXRA here in the next cycle once its products gets mass adoption

>>55745120
You're dumb bro

>>55741876
The real top ten is:

BTC
ETH
XMR
DAI
AVAX
ALGO
PAXG
MATIC
LINK
SKL

>>55741876
It is what it is atm Anon. I hope to see new assets there as the market evolves and the likes of ETH will go higher as well as Matic, while also expecting to see RIDE make it to the list as they keep up with their development.

>>55741876
1. XRP
2. XMR
The rest: doesn't matter

>>55749687
Sorry meant ATOM instead of AVAX.

>>55741876
plebbit (ticker: PLEB). it will happen btw.

>>55741876
1) ETH
2) LUSD
3) RAI
4) ARB
5) OP
6) MKR
7) BTC
8) DAI
9) AR
10) RPL

>>55749493
I don't know about top 10 but I think top 100 is certain because of what it's building

>>55749709
We might have LDO or LBR joining the top soon. LSDFi is on a banger. SPOOL and PENDLE are coming behind.

>>55741876
Privacy-focused projects like RAIL and XMR. Those bad boys would totally be chillin' in the top ten.

>>55749697
Idk anon, memecoins are getting weeded out of the top spots. They would likely be replaced by alts with utility and I have eyes on a few like Ocean and Sylo which are focused on data protection in web3.

PNK

>>55749710
I think projects with real-world utilities
are strong candidates for top coins. I wouldn't expect much, but I'm betting on Peaq to be one of those coins since DePIN on Polkadot is making huge moves.