/biz/ - Business & Finance

Not buying your stupid science scam pump the day before red tuesday

>>55717875
Oh shit, they replicated the ambient superconducter?

>>55717875
How hard is it to test superconductivity? I feel like it either is or isn't, just run electricity through it and see if it heats its surroundings.

>>55717875

WAIT I THOUGHT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO LONG COPPER

>>55717875
Okay
Keep me posted

>>55717892

https://twitter.com/Andercot/status/1686215574177841152

>Lawrence Berkeley National Lab simulated this using heavy-duty compute power from the Department of Energy, and looked to see what would happen to the 'electronic structure' of this material, meaning, what are the available conduction pathways in the material.

>It turns out that there are conduction pathways for electrons that are in just the right conditions and places that would enable them to 'superconduct'. More specifically, they were close to the 'Fermi Surface' which is like the sea-level of electrical energy, as in '0 ft above sea-level.' It's believed currently that the more conduction pathways close to the Fermi surface, the higher the temperature you can superconduct at (An analogy might be how its easier for planes to fly close to the surface of the ocean due to the 'ground effect' that gives them more lift.)

>>55717875
Shit suprlerconductor, wires will be too heavy, try something else.

>>55717888
red markets for crypto likely based on what this means for quantum computing

based

Assume it was confirmed. What orders do you place in premarket? Copper and lead already got priced in hard I believe.
Which quantum stocks are good even if this is a flop?

>>55717875
How do I calculate this?

>>55718015
prediction markets if you want quick gains

>>55718018
no clue, am <50 IQ

>>55717875
>Government forced to admit existence of AYY-LMAO's
>Check out this completely unrelated discovery of room temp superconductors
Many such cases.

>>55718054
Thank you but I meant more long term. Or assuming this isn't quite the right thing but perhaps leads to the discovery of something replicable and easily manufacturable within 5 years. I know nothing about the technology or physics so it's hard to do DD in on this specific thing.

>>55718015
If this is real, anon…we won’t need money where we’re going. Born too late to explore the sea…born just in time to inherent the stars and everything in the spaces between space.

>>55717875
>This is huge
nothingburger confirmed

>>55717875
They already knew about this material design and have better superconductors but because dummy Koreans are transparent now we gotta pretend to catch up lol.

Gold not needed. Kek rockchuds

>>55718103
Kek

>>55718148
>Just like Star Trek

>>55717875
Qrd on what this is? Seeing it everywhere on twitter.

Listen up, fags:
>250 MILLIAMP (0.25 AMPS) CRITICAL CURRENT LIMIT
That means it can only handle that amount of current before it suddenly loses its superconductivity and becomes a shitty regular conductor, if not worse. Guess what you can do with that? Thats right, abso fucking lutely nothing. This is a nothingburger. MRI machines need tens of thousands of amps. Fusion reactors need over 1 million. Even a fucking maglev train needs thousands.
>HARD BRITTLE CRYSTAL
Massive problem #2. It's not ductile, you can't draw this stuff into wires or make coils with it, severely limiting its capabilities to be used the way every dreamfag thinks. This is useless GARBAGE.
>YOU'RE JUST A HATER
No, I like superconductors. They have great potential, but this is not it. Not even close.
>THEY'RE GOING TO IMPROVE MANUFACTURING
No they're not. Remember graphene? Carbon nanotubes? They have such amazing properties, and yet they're still nowhere because they still can't figure out even after 15 years how to make it in sufficient quantity and especially at the right quality. Now the paper that OP linked discusses that for the copper atoms to be deposited into the right place is going to be forever extremely difficult and expensive because they need to be in high-binding sites, meaning that in order to get high quality material, you need to place with atomic precision each copper atom in the exact spot where binding forces are the most extreme and unforgiving.
TL;DR Never happening. SELL/DUMP

>>55718574
Hmm, not one single crackpot /sci/entist has mentioned this issue at all. But since you came along and offered your position in authority and appeal to emotion that it must be over.

>>55718600
Have you read the threads? They're all /pol/tards or other cretins that are just asking about robot wives or other stupid shit. Do you really believe anything they have to say has any value? What I've said are all in the papers, you can confirm it yourself or choose to be in denial. It's your choice, and your money. Don't say I didn't warn all of you.

>>55718103
Desu. Really activates the neurons

>>55718574
midwit engineer detected
assuming it's all real, then it's a massive breakthrough in superconductor science, theoretical and practical. It's not going to stop at LK-99. think of this as similar to Bell laboratories invention of the transistor.

>>55718734
I like the part where you conveniently leave out the part where I use graphene and nanotubes as examples of something that would change the world but didn't. Or that high temperature superconductors have already been discovered but has seen next to no use and that many MRI machines and maglevs still have to use helium-cooled magnets that are niobium-based, among other things.

When we discovered what cancer was, when we discovered that fusion was possible, we thought everything would change. Hundreds of billions of dollars later, nothing has. Still same radiation. Same chemo. Same "ITER soon" every 5 years.

>>55718748
>every breakthrough is just like every other breakthrough (specifically these cherry-picked ones)
it's ironic that you think like that since the same type of thinking is what got everyone hyped up about graphene and nanotubes. comparing them to transistors when it was clear they would be extremely hard to manufacture. however the appropriate counter to idiot optimism is not idiot pessimism. treat every breakthrough individually. this one is much more similar to the transistor. it's also promising that the initial production is not elaborate nor are there exotic materials involved. Also it's only been 4 days, to pretend like LK-99 won't be researched and optimized is either retarded or just disingenuous.

>>55718863
Look, read the paper yourself. It clearly states that the copper atoms need to be placed in exactly the right places, and that those places are highly bound and not easy. The mixed copper usually ends up in atomic cavities where they do not create the superconducting path in the material. That's why nobody has been able to do replication, including the researchers themselves. They don't actually know how to reliably make it, either. You need atomic scale accuracy to get a high purity sample, not grug-style pound-n-mix.
>idiot pessimism
It's grounded caution. Graphene and carbon nanotubes were hard to make then, but everyone had faith the manufacturing challenges would be worked out in short order. It wasn't. What this paper is suggesting is a manufacturing challenge an order of magnitude more difficult to address than that. Now if this thing had all the properties I mentioned earlier like being ductile and holding tons of current and being resilient to magnetic fields, then you bet your ass despite it being a pain in the ass to make and prohibitively expensive, people will pour *TRILLIONS* of dollars anyways. But for properties like this? No way. It's a nothingburger.

>>55717875
where can i buy lead futures?

>>55717912
Copper phosphate is going insanely high right now.

>>55718907
nanoscientist here, I agree

also this is unrelated to quantum computing, the big ibstacle there is decoherence which is intrinsically, fundamentally going to be an obstacle with complex macro systems, which a computer by definition is. That's why they can only get it to work with the simplest of circuits. Pipedream.

>>55718907
>That's why nobody has been able to do replication
it hasn't even been a week. have some patience you fucking nigger
>including the researchers themselves. They don't actually know how to reliably make it, either.
based on the paper and method of release a lot of other researchers have been calling these guys amateurish

>Now if this thing had all the properties I mentioned earlier
3rd time I'll say this, hopefully it will get through your thick head: this isn't about LK-99 specifically. this is a about a new class of superconductor. can you really not comprehend that a prototype of a newly discovered class of material is almost always crude and inefficient?

>>That's why nobody has been able to do replication
>it hasn't even been a week. have some patience you fucking nigger
or maybe you won't need patience
https://twitter.com/Andercot/status/1686286684424691712

chinks figured it out
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV14p4y1V7kS/

>>55719149
You have no right to be calling anyone a nigger, you nigger.

>>55719193
seeth more midwit faggot. some random chinks already replicated LK-99. took less than an hour for reality to prove you're full of shit.

if the lead superconductor is real and the mechanism is theoretically sound, then we can design many more superconductors using this principle...

TL;DR
no need to invest in lead, wait for gen 2

>>55719229
You can't even see his hand or the little fragment that is the size of a human blood cell. Just kill yourself you absolute moron.

>>55717897
Just measure resistance.

>>55719280
I think too many people are jumping the gun on material related investments. real bottleneck will probably be the machinery needed to make these superconductors in mass. invest in those rather than raw material. also invest in the companies that have acquired the talent to use these machines.

>>55719301
>You can't even see his hand or the little fragment that is the size of a human blood cell
cope. true sign of a midwit: can't admit their wrong. that's why they are doomed to midwitdom. a true scientist knows that the only way to improve their understanding of the world is by making predictions. if the prediction is right, then congrats, keep the model of understanding. if the prediction is wrong, then update the model, and now you have a higher chance of being correct the next time. most people fail at the latter, that's why they remain midwits.

>also invest in the companies that have acquired the talent to use these machines.
seems like the market agrees here

>>55718574
>250 MILLIAMP (0.25 AMPS) CRITICAL CURRENT LIMIT
My sybian uses more energy than that. Nothingburger confirmed

>>55718148
>He thinks we'll even be on Mars in our lifetimes

Lol, lmao.

>>55718103
You mean the government that was so retarded they once had a program for remote viewing
We already know there are a lot of retards in the government. That doesn't mean you have to be one

>>55718938
>Copper phosphate
Where does one trade this?

>>55718574
>250 MILLIAMP (0.25 AMPS) CRITICAL CURRENT LIMIT
Yeah, this is the biggest problem
But, the fact that they figured out to make a superconductor in a novel way that isnt mking some shitty variant of the same ceramics IS a major breakthrough

Can you explain why this is such a huge thing? What are some practical uses of this?

>>55719449
However, as it's a superconductor, you can use any voltage. That means you can transport 5W using 20V/0.25A, or 5mW using 20 000kV/0.25A.
This obviously is theoretical, but you get my drift.

However, it's all moot until the superconductivity can be replicated with confidence.

>>55719508
improved speaker cables and very poor quality resistors.

>>55719508
More electricity through way less "wire" operating at room temperature and air pressure which has been a huge hurdle for superconductors and with far less heat generated during operation than conventional copper wire. As well as being able to be made with common materials.

Assuming it's not a one-off that can't be reproduced reliably and more than once and doesn't run into any major roadblocks turning it from a proof of concept into a usable thing it would be worth trillions and trillions of dollars.

>>55719517
Ah, good point, but I have honestly repressed all my memories on electrodynamics, so i have no idea if thats useful in any way (aka if can easily convert you high energy electrons into something more palpable)

>>55719548
It is for semiconductors.
But we wont see a powercable from the vast (to be built) windfarms of inner Greenland to Europe and North America.

But again, as long as it's not repeatable i stay long copper.

>>55717888
Checked
I suggest to have a look at the political ideology of the "producers" of that illegal fund raising scam. Mostly socialists, no potential growth

>>>55719593
bro.
im starting to get ambivalent about this.
if you want i will simply force discussion and highlight the flaws.

stop this shit. at least for now. we need you to do this in the future.

fuck off and scam cobalt. check the long term and set a trap there instead. do not touch my futurism. its the only thing i have left before monke

>>55719739
>Cobalt
>Not the bismuth play

>>55717875
It's a fucking magnet

>>55718574
>250 MILLIAMP (0.25 AMPS) CRITICAL CURRENT LIMIT

it's a superconductor. insulation is cheap. just pump up the voltage.

>>55719754
anything rem. dont care. just seems like a too good too be true chart set the scammers could exploit. besides australia is about do ask for investors in cobalt recovery systems. theres market movement in the mid-near. just leave my fucking poor research alone.
fucking this research with too many hands and eyes has knock on effects for others work in tangental fields.

this is my furries. please respect me. live and let live?

GIVE ME MY FUCKING HOVER BOARD NOW YOU FUCKING NIGGERS

>>55718148
Space is utterly fake anon. Hate to breaking to you.

>>55719791
shhh let him bounce off the firmament it will be funny

>>55719776
It's only just joegan (The superconductor powered rapture)

>>55719777
cheked
The other day I drew a little rough design on a serviette
So now all you have to do is make it work and shit
Just get some magnets and a piece of wood and glue 'em on
But I'm not trying to tell you people how to do your job
Just keep the drawings and I'll be back in the morning
To check whether you're dawdling, you're sure to win awards for it
The most awesomest idea since the DeLorean
Be sure to try to make one to travel over water with em
And yeah I thought I saw 'em on Beyond 2000
And I'm pretty sure that we're beyond that now man
I know I'm rambling but fucking hell, science
I just want a hoverboard before I'm too old to ride it

dear science. i just want to let you know you let me down.

>>55719773
For real. That nigga don’t even know about ohms muhfuckin law

Not only only am I a retard, but I’m phonefagging aswell. Nevertheless I’m going to bless you with my baseless opinions anyway.
It’s all a scam. I don’t think an ambient temp superconductor is possible, given that the moleculator structure cant be allowed to move at all in order to sustain continous quantum wells. Carbon nanotubes are cool, but I don’t think even they will live up to their hype.

I feel like a retard in this thread and I have a STEM MSc. This basically means you don't need 0 Kelvin temperatures? I don't know shit about quantum computers.

>>55718574
faggot, they will pour tons of money into this to optimize it for comerical and industiral use

Someone please do a midwit meme where the low IQ go 'it's a fucking magnet lol', the midwit fags sperg out about how it's going to change everything, deprecate silver, and revolutionize shitting in the toilet, and the high IQ dismiss it as infeasible to manufacture and a likely psyop

>>55720074
how about the 'virgin pessimist' and the 'chad optimist'

>>55717875
lead is saturn = ruin
superconductor = faster death of man
be careful with your lives, they are a blip

>>55720089
How about the basedjack "science" believer vaxxtard and the chad psyop see-througher?

>>55720150
>jack
you're trying too hard, tourist

>>55718103
>falling for kike NATO propaganda

It's not a scam - it's now being theoretically and practically replicated by several independent organisations. The question is whether it's practically feasible to manufacture at scale and replace current industries and methodologies.

Also if it was a scam/psyop then it would be all over the mainstream media - they're completely silent on it. There's a few thousand people on twitter talking about it and that's it

>>55720150
All the reddit soys are the skeptics on this one. That's how I know it's real.

>>55720229
https://terpconnect.umd.edu/~wbreslyn/chemistry/is-copper-magnetic.html#:~:text=So%20the%20short%20answer%20is,is%20based%20on%20Lenz's%20Law.

what is the coating on?

Can it reduce my turbo lag?
Does it pour the perfect pint?
No?
Well who fuckin cares you massive bag of queers, remember to mask up for schlomo

>goyim still can't spot basedence hoaxes
lmfao
time for another booster

>>55720239

>>55717875
Long lead? Anon are u suggesting there is a shortage of fucking LEAD?

first time on biz, so i heard about this on /b/ of all places. i see that super conductor companies are up like 40 percent today, is this hype/fomo or should people jump in?

Ok bros, lets list some stonks that may benefit from this:

>AMSC
Obviously

>RGTI, IONQ, QBTS, IBM
Some stonks on quantum computing tech related companies

Go on

>>55721445

>amsc

i was looking at this in the morning thinking it with fomo and now I see where its at, i hate my life. i get sucked into bullshit all the time but when its right in front of me i pass.

>>55721456
I bought at 15 and I hate myself for not buying at 10$ yesterday.
Regarding rigetti (dedicated to quantum computing hardware based on superconductors, not ion traps, photons nor annealing) I hate buying today at 2.5 and not yesterday at 1.89.

You are still on time anon.

>>55720638
>comfortable enough in their masculinity they cry in public surrounded by their army bros
sounds pretty based tb h

WAGMI

>>55718863
>however the appropriate counter to idiot optimism is not idiot pessimism
Based

ASC was like 300 in 2010. Whats the highers this thing could go in another ten years?

>>55721597

How can a company go from thaat high to 15 bucks? were they sold out? what happened.

>>55721637
Amsc i mean. And Im assuming because superconductors didnt pan out until now.

>>55721644

So the $300 was based on hype alone?

>>55718574
i noticed that the most knowledgeable comment got the most amount of reee'ing here
and yes you might be optimistic about future developments
BUT like every superconducting material before it, these are all brittle ceramics, which means turning them into any useful application is fucking hard and expensive
especially something as critical as chips this would be 2 decades away at the earliest

in any case the amounts of lead and copper this uses are tiny compared to current bulk uses so buying commodities contracts on this news is retarded beyond believe

>>55721741
>Other room temp superconductors
Such as nigger?

>>55717875
What public companies actually deal with this? I tried looking for lead and phosphate mining companies and all I can find are delisted Chinese companies and a state owned Moroccan slaver guild--I mean mining company.

Remember your physics equation, V = IR? Well, the R part is essentially gonna be permanently relegated to R = 1 if this actually ticking real. That’s like telling someone you don’t have to account for friction in whatever they are designing/making.

I bought 77 shares AMSC @ $15.14.
I feel like $30 is pretty fair, a quick in and out before the week is out.
my wife suggests $45.
how high should I set my sell order?

>>55722257
If amsc gave dividends I would hold virtually forever, but 40 seems good.

If they can make, and it seems they do, microsized superconductors, 0,25A is a lot on a microchip.

>>55722398
yea I don't get why >>55718574 sperged out.
250 mA should be more then enough for most motherboards. e.g. average is 25-40 watts between, which is like 200 mA to 333 mA.
so not great for current super performant computers, but dude it's a room temperature superconductor, you probably change the whole system design and run lower amperage on the board.

>>55721997
according to simulations (big) IF the proposed mechanism works then at least Gold and Silver would also work, and knowing the principle other parent compounds could be found

oy vey how can I steal the patent

>>55722819
>we find that among the considered DOPING elements... gold DOPING effects more similar to copper then silver
no, gold/silver are not alternative room temperature room air pressure superconductors.
it's saying the recipe for LK-99, which is 'copper + lead', could get similar results with a recipe like 'gold + lead' or 'silver + lead'.
you probably wouldn't use the more expensive recipes. but they're potential alternative recipes for the same thing.

>>55722185
>superconductor
>R=1
nigga...

>>55719403
you actually think remote viewing isn't real?
kek
what a fucking moron hahaha
I bet pizzagate isn't real either huh?
ahaha

>>55723147

someone can’t plug numbers into an equation i see

>>55717897
superconductors aren't exactly 0 resistance because that would be physically absurd, they just have a resistance multiple orders of magnitude below copper
copper is x10^-7, superconducting threshold is x10^-13 resistivity

>>55717875
>computer models
>RESULTS
yeah, ok

>>55718574
based and mostly true post
this stuff, if manufacturable, will be very useful in computer chips, replacing all the copper traces with this stuff will allow any given CPU to be driven at far higher frequencies without burning out

>>55723587
he said, its not useful

>>55719517
superconductors actually do have some resistance, it's just extremely tiny
it may or may not be practical to distribute power using ceramic bus bars of this material in AC systems that limit the high voltage current using transformer impedance, but the actual power drive systems can't use this because of the tiny amp limit
so its sort of like HVDC, in that you lose a lot less power than traditional HVAC, but the only place that can use it is the highest voltage lines, and it requires a shitload of expensive equipment to transform the power
if you run AC through the superconductors, it will lose almost the exact same power as regular HVAC power lines because the majority of their power is capacitive coupling to the earth, not I^2R

>>55717892
No lol they're now theoretically coping

>>55723635
thats only accurate if this material ends up being impossible to manufacture, which may or may not be the case
the lab that produced the paper has a video of a hand-sized chunk of the stuff levitating over a magnet, have you ever seen a hand-sized chunk of graphene or carbon nanotubes?

Gentlemen, if I may.

The debate over whether this technology is viable in the short term is moot. We need to establish what is going to pump in the next five days on the speculation that this is real. What are Boomers going to throw their retirement funds into? How do we squeeze money out of retards bandwagoning the initial hype? $AMSC seems like the best play right now and it's an anagram for SCAM which is great for meme magic potential.

>>55723699
you're poor = you're too late to the grift nigger
thanks for playing!

>>55723661
So, you didnt read his post?

>>55723748
So, you didn't read the paper?

>>55723757
What about the fact thats its too brittle?

>>55723778
too brittle for nanoscopic traces on a silicon wafer?
wafers that already use loads of ceramics and are made of a brittle material in the first place?
you don't know anything you brown pajeet nigger, go read a book

>>55723785
Just trying to get to the bottom.
So what about his post was true? Youre basically contradicting everything he wrote.

>>55723830
Ah so you are in fact a brown ESL.
Learn basic english, then reread both of our posts.

>>55723842
not brown, just not inteligent enough for this topic

>>55723864
ok
TLDR:
1. this is mostly useless for power distribution because of the low amp limit and the brittle nature of the material
2. it may or may not be extremely difficult to produce, if it is, then it is also useless for computer chips, if not, it will be useful for computer chips

>>55723879
thanks
thats simple enough even for me

>ceramic can't be used in wires
brittlefags are retarded or can't do basic research. see pic. they figured this out back in 1991

the q center in korea has the patent are they public? idk how to get korean stock

>>55721657
>got to $300 just from tech bubble hype
>now at $15 the hype is suddenly real
>+2000% to go until fair value
fuck it I'll buy some yolo calls tomorrow, if it's really a 0 to 1 moment then the sky's the limit, even if just based on meme momentum

>buying after a +100% day
yes I can and I will and you can't stop me

>>55717875
Bullshit story created by Jews like AI. Now they will ask the government to print more money to be invested in their project and after two years everyone will forget it.

>>55725754
take your meds schizo.
>https://twitter.com/nimorotem/status/1686483337978970112

>>55725671
Bro this play is still early. Articles about its pump today said it went up on no news kek.

>>55725781
Wow a magnet.

Here's some market potentials for this stuff.

It's over

>>55726388
Am I retarded or could you just cast-pour the ceramic into the grooves of the circuit board or something?

>>55717875
This seems like a decent time for me to get into investing. Where do I start? What stocks are good for this?

>>55726388
>It's glass! What you though you could make wires out of it?!

>>55725912
It's a really big fucking magnet. And yeah, on the one hand, that's all it is, just like your car is just a pressure cooker attached to four wheels. The important part is that really big fucking magnets are really fucking expensive, and if this works they'll become really cheap.

>>55726402
I don't even think that's what it's for: It replaces the magnet in things with magnets inside them, not the wires.

>>55718015
AMSC is obvs it literally has AMERICA and SUPERCONDUCTOR in the name. Most likely to catch meme status if findings confirmed imo, and market cap wise it's like GME at $2.

RGTI my pick for quantum. IDK why you'd fuck with metals, the initial applications will probably be in microcircuitry where you don't even need a ton of material to revolutionize the industry.

>>55723699
This anon made some money
What's the play tomorrow

>>55726567
it can't replace electromagnets because of the low critical current

>>55726402
computer chips are already made with a bunch of ceramic materials in them
and silicon itself is not exactly ductile
large power lines are out of the question for multiple reasons though

>>55726550
??? that's not what this is about. this is a possible room temperature superconductor not a magnet innovation

>>55717919
>simulated
Yawn..

>>55726760
Bro there is a literal magnet in that tweeter picture. Are you fucking high?

>>55726817
incredible how pajeets who literally don't know anything will make confident assertions on www.4channel.org

>>55726817
there literally isn't. there's a skipping stone half floating over a big shiny rock

>>55726402
You're not retarded

>>55726567
Retarded

>>55726824
>implying all Americans know how magnets work

>>55727318
My highest grade after Holocaust class was Magnet class

>>55727318
Is there anyone who actually understands the source of magnetism

This could turn out real or not but you'd have to a be a fucking moron to not get in on a hype wave this big this early.

There have been two replications reported out of china, and two major simulation successes from China and Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.

This is the #1 viral trending topic on chinese social media (pic related) and basically zero exposure to the gen public in the US yet. It's coming, and it's gonna be big when major news outlets pick it up.

Regardless of if it pans out, which will take weeks to figure out, it's gonna fucking explode some stocks. Get you asses in now and get out after 10xing.

My picks so far:

-QBTS
-RGTI
-IONQ
These are quantum computing companies which are already pumping and could revolutionize everything if LK-99 turns out to be legit. They are small enough to make huge multiples but big enough to be legit. They don't need the superconductor to be flexible or made into wires to be useful.

-AMSC
Actually not a huge meme, they specialize in adapting superconductors to practical applications and have had success in making brittle materials into wire before which might be exactly what we need with this new ceramic material. Also the name and the fact that they are already going to the moon based on that alone. We ARENT too late on this at all, we are early AF. Not a single major US news organization has picked this up yet.

>>55727352
faeries?

>>55718018
Density functional theory

>>55720638

>>55726727
Small time investing outlets are putting out American articles with the pump on "no news". A couple of literal no troll female jeet articles about how American doesn't own the rock so it will go bankrupt, implying they won't adopt room temp superconductors into their product line almost immediately.

Over the next few months, watch for superconductor R&D private companies, manufacturing companies announcing mass production and later companies with use cases (a lot).

American is still the current play being only 1 of 2 superconductor companies on the U.S. market. Also long copper, copper phosphate and if you're the sentimental type, get an azurite crystal.

American Superconductor ticker is now a no-no word.

Jannies = Axe wound trannies

>>55723661
>video of a hand-sized chunk of the stuff levitating over a magnet
It's the size of a penny and isn't even floating all the way which indicates it's not expelling magnetic fields uniformly and that the material is anisotropic.
Why do IFLS sois have to exaggerate everything?

>>55727437
What’s the other superconductor company?

>>55727527
Bruker.

>>55727470
Why even comment if you haven't spent 15 minutes to read a single expert opinion?

>>55727366
Never got Into stocks before, what's the easiest way?

again, it doesn't matter at all if this pans out. It's already panned out enough to make a huge impact. Garbage ass unknown shitcoin hype makes billions, what do you think a potential for technological revolution is gonna do?

Arguing over the science at this point is like arguing over mass dogecoin adoption the day after elon tweeted it. Doesn't fucking matter

>>55728060
Which platform/exchange is easiest to get started with that I can buy some of the stocks you listed?

>>55728335
Try zecco. Zero commission trading

AMSC is an unbanned word again!

Mods = Gods

I’m fucking pumped bros. With the right moves I think it’s possible to get obscenely rich off this discovery.

>>55717875
zzz

>>55727369
Like Alan Turing or something?

Shopping list for post-manufacture stage/adoption phase.

>>55717919
>Simulated
Cold Fusion 2: Diamagnetic Boogaloo

>>55727366
All your stucks already pumped super hard. Are you fooling us?

>>55726388
Ahhhhh, my good old friend, Midwit Thunderf00t

>>55727366
>QBTS
>RGTI
>IONQ

RGTI is the most important here. QBTS (D-Wave) is based on quantum annealing, which is so-so. IONQ uses ion traps. Rigetti is the one 100% based on superconductors.

>>55727352
i mean. i do (idont), but its not something i can explain easily. is the answer you want electrons or plasma?

>>55719394
ywnbaw

>>55728432
>Jannies banned a ticker that made me 15% gains yeterday
Figures

How much should I throw in amsc

>>55732267
All of your money

So, one chinese team claims to have replicated it, two others claimed they couldnt replicate it.
Who do I believe?

>>55718148
>bro bro this conductive pebble will change EVERYTHING because... well it just does okay

>>55717875
I would wait till christmas, to invest in it. Firsti it before the new year. Second, I givee you enough time to see if it for real, or just another Fleischmann/Pons. Third, it let the markets recover from the Ides of September.

>>55730251
LOL thinks RGTI is important

IONQ is the only real value from that pick.

>>55736561
sell/dump

AMSC bros… why are we down 30%?

>>55736910
It was proven to only work at 110k

Not a room temp superconductor

yeah im thinking its real lads...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W8rZzhl7pE

AMSCbros... i dont feel very well

>>55725912
the resistance is important it supposedly 0 ohms, we could make cpus that dont generate heat

The Korean Superconducting Low Temperature Society, composed of domestic superconductor experts, recently revealed on the 3rd the reason for concluding that the material LK-99, which was claimed to be a room-temperature superconductor at a domestic research institute, cannot be categorized as such due to the absence of the characteristic Meissner effect, according to a report.

so is it falling all apart? How hard can it be to test this properly? Sounds like something I could do in my kitchen.

>>55739258
shit I got in at 15$

>>55727352
APOLOGIZE

>The professor of Southeast University claimed that lk99 which he replicated has zero resistivity at 100K without meissner effect.
If only 1 group can actually replicate lk-99...

>>55718412
>substituting GOLD in place of COPPER doping improved the resulting material.

>>55739258
hey, it's not over yet.
the researchers tested 2 things, does LK-99 superconduct at room temperature, these guys say no, and then a different set of guys made sure it's not just a magnet.
but neither of them performed both tests.
and both of them had to manufacture their own LK-99, so they could just manufacture it poorly.
if it really was a big deal, of course you don't want other people to think it works, you want to down play it until you know how to mass produce it.

>>55740445
>100K
>"room temperature"
Anon, I....

>>55738993
burn in hell anon

>>55739258
do i fucking sell now that i've lost 30%

this is the biggest single day loss i've ever had. premarket's $9.30

>>55740686
yes

>>55740608
The new narrative is if they can even replicate @100k, follow the newer news. It is still relevant if LK-99 can act as SC @100k bc it is a lot more efficient than present SC.

>>55740553
My layman's understanding is that there is some thought that due to the fact that you're dealing with quantum funtimes the manufacturing might be somewhat luck-based or something.

>>55740686
Short term it may be ded. Long term, if LK-99 or any research resulting it from it may be viable then it could be a good play. Idk. The fact that they make superconducting wire seems like they’re the market leader. I threw $400 in. Wonder if other anons got mega just’ed.

>>55717875
OH NO NOT THE NEW GRAPHENE

I not in yet, just researching but this could turn out to be the next huge thing aside from possible crypto next bullrun.

>>55717875
Why hasnt any US lab reproduced the results? A chinese lab failed to do so. All I've seen from US labs are these theoretical analyses. Its supposed to be incredibly cheap and easy material to make so what is the delay?

>>55721514
Intredasting..

>>55740735
when i saw they had gov contracts i did not expect a fucking rug like this. i bought in at $13 on the way down. i'll take the loss, sell at fucking 9, feel like a loser for a few days and move on.

>>55740754
here is your reproduction

>>55740733
you really can ignore my post.
I'm just coping.
>bought $1k @ $15.14

>>55740754
>Its supposed to be incredibly cheap and easy material to make so what is the delay?
uhh it still takes like 5 days to make lol.

market open under $10.
piece of shit. fuck fuck fuck.

How much should I put in amsc? Its sitting at around 10 right now. I've seen anons say they've put in 40-1,000$

>>55741646
The science has been settled
It’s over

>>55740801

Amsc is cratering right now lmao

>>55717875
A Lawrence Berkeley National Lab just flew over my housr

I went in for $500 @ $15.
I think I'm just going to hodl. Any reason I shouldn't?

>>55742784
>Any reason I shouldn't?
Every single time you load up your brokerage account you will see that giant red dildo smacking you in the face over and over again, reminding you to not fall for the chink space-race propaganda next time.

Yeah, hold onto it.