/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55641689
Look up how much revenue CCIP has made in the last 24 hours. Try not to cry while doing it.

>>55641702
you are gonna miss out. Not my problem

>>55641702
it seems the mainnet "test" is offline ?
>https://ccip.chain.link/status
that would explain the non existing revenue.

>>55641737
miss out on what? Tell me explicitly what I will miss out on.

>>55641768
No

>>55641766
did they take the mainnets off the explorer because only snx and aave are using them or something and they dont want to confuse people?

this would be better than them having issues.

>>55641778
>noooo le heckin' transactions cost only 0.01-0.1 link
>that means it'll never make money
yeah, more and cheaper roads mean less usage
>b..bbu...but nobody uses it
it's still being tested and implemented and basically no dapps are able to use it yet
>bbbbb buuuut
no

>>55641778
kek
>>55641797
cope

>>55641689
Chainlink oracles are one thing, but CCIP is a terrible product. One of the worst bridges. Total letdown.

>>55641857
Chainlink oracles and CCIP are good products but as always none of the value actually flows to the LINK token. Chainlink will continue to subsidise the entire crypto space for 10 years because Sergey is a fat beta male.

>>55641857
>>55641907
Obsessive fudding is a mental illness

>>55641857
>>55641907
mentally ill

>>55641702
>$30??
Bruhhhh lmfao ouch just imagine the mental gymnastics olympics linkfags are going through right now

>>55642062
At least put a trigger warning there. You know how sensitive linkers are. CCIP is all they have, I'm seriously concerned for their mental health.

>>55641827
>cope
you know i'm right and you adjusted your FUD accordingly.

>>55642214
The "FUD" which is true, is that no-one holding LINK will profit from any of this in the near future.

>>55641689
Why is dot or atom dead? Wouldn’t they just be a part of the protocol?

>>55642269
something we agree on.

>>55642346
so why hold? For your grandkids?

>>55642359
ok, define near future

>>55642370
within 3 years.

>>55641689
Chainlink is a neither a layer 0 nor a layer 2. It's a decentralized oracle network that connects everything. It's a substrate, not a layer.

>>55642395
Compare that to Polkadot, which is a Layer 0. It is centralized in nature and requires that everything sync up to the relay chain.

>>55642376
yeah that's probably about it.
>>55642359
>why hold?
so you can FUD.

>>55642395
>>55642413
layer 0 not needed

>>55641907
I don't think CCIP is a good product at all. It's one of the worst bridges. It's just another mint/lock third party validation bridge (in this case a multi-sig) with extremely slow executions.

They dropped the ball. I think it was an exit scam.

>>55644144
At least be accurate in your FUD. The current script is that CCIP is impressive tech but no value will flow through the network as a result.

>>55644594
>as a result.
As a result of what? Of it being good tech? How does that make sense?

Patrick Collins found a critical vulnerability with CCIP during the Code4rena audit but he did not submit it to the contest.
Instead he submitted his findings to Dan Elitzer and Dan Elitzer and Patrick Collins and a few other VCs are in the process of blackmailing Sergey right now over Zoom for cheap LINK tokens in exchange for keeping the problem quiet.
Once the VCs have control over 51% of all LINK tokens they will moon it to 1keoy.
Trust the plan LINK marines WAGMI

>>55641702
Can't comprehend the tech that Chainlink's CCIP is pumping out? You must be one of those retards who sold the bottom and bought the top in 2021. Sad.

Let's start with basics. Chainlink's CCIP, or Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol, for the uninitiated, is not just another blockchain buzzword. It's a game-changer. It's like TCP/IP for blockchains- no more isolated computers, it's a whole interconnected universe now. It's making the world of blockchain as borderless as it was meant to be, ready for enterprise applications.

You say no value is gonna flow through the network, right? LMAO. The real value here is the infrastructural boost that the CCIP is giving to the entire ecosystem. Faster transactions, lower fees, better interconnectivity - it's like the internet in the 90s, man.

Now let's talk about LINK. We've seen bull runs, bear markets, even the most brutal crypto winters, and yet, we're still standing. And you know why? Because we believe in the tech.

While you're out here spreading FUD, we're quietly stacking our LINKies, getting ready for the next bull run. And oh boy, it's gonna be a glorious one. And in the midst of it all, will be us LINK Marines, celebrating as we ride our LINKies to a new ATH.

Keep crying about 'no value' all you want. But remember, while you do that, the LINK marines will be prepping our moon suits.

>>55644144
No, it is THE bridge.

>>55644743
CCIP wasnt even a narrative 2 years ago. Kek how convenient you swept all the other failures under the rug.
Link was never about price feeds, vrf, deco, mixicles, arbitrum or staking, it was always about CCIP!

Kek poor baggies
>July 7, 2020
>LINK: $6.47
>BTC: $9,108
>ETH: $246
>BNB: $16.77
>ADA: $0.12
>SOL: $0.75
>DOGE: $0.003
>LTC: $43
>MATIC: $0.02
>TRX: $0.01
>XRP: $0.19

>July 7, 2023
>LINK: $6.16
>BTC: $30,342
>ETH: $1,868
>BNB: $236
>ADA: $0.28
>SOL: $21.90
>DOGE: $0.06
>LTC: $98
>MATIC: $0.68
>TRX: $0.079
>XRP: $0.47

>>55644808
>Link was never about price feeds, vrf, deco, mixicles, arbitrum or staking, it was always about CCIP!
Link was never about any one of those. It was, is, and always will be about all of them.
>Kek poor baggies
Your pity is feigned, but I truly feel it for you.

This thread is concerning. I am seriously considering selling all of my Chainlink now.

>ohhhhh WOW marinesthhhh…did I stumble on LE SEGRETTTTTTTTTTT investment????

>holy HECK guysthhhhh Im buying moar RIGHT?!!!?!??

>LMAO just boughted the DIP, what a STEAL!!!!!!

>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude we R So under the RADAR

>>55644756
I'll tell you what, you can use this bridge and pay $10 to bridge $10 and wait 1 hour for your transaction to go through, so long as the multi-sig doesn't steal all your assets, and I'll use a MUCH faster bridge and pay FAR less in fees and not have to worry about a third party stealing my assets.

>>55644808
Unironically, link

Link is beyond being the universal gas or the layer zero. Link is the world's lingua franca

>>55642395
old pic.

It really is layer Zero. Other blockchains are basically nodes for the Chainlink network. Notice this other older pic (but a year younger) focusing on dapps and not blockchains like yours.

>>55644743
Chainlink? Now *that's* a bright idea!

>>55641689
You've got no notion what's going on in the Polkadot eco, Pajeet. Peaq has become the hub for DePIN and EOT on their chain, bringing up fresh prospects for anons.

>>55641778
Fucking based lmao

>>55642062
Jeets will always find ways to cope. Not that I care. Too busy slurping the staking rewards on AstraDAO and iTokens of their index.

niggers smell bad

>>55644961
it's now about blockchain gaming as well, exciting times ahead! it's a bit like those take out places where you can get pizza, pasta, burgers, asian food and kebab. can't go wrong with this broad catalog of functionality

GM based kings

>>55641778
Kek based
>>55641797
Actual cope post