/biz/ - Business & Finance

We continue with the rest of their coverage, notice what's missing from ETHCC

I find this odd as I thought CCIP was being worked on with their Base L2, but I do know Base is in the SCALE program. So you'd think they would let their institutional clients know about this, but nothing.

>I am an institutional investor

Holding a coin died 6 years ago doesn't make you that schizo, it makes you a bagholder

>>55622163
>>55622144
lmfao thats so blatant
>>55622166
HAHAHAHA fudnigger didn't buy enough at sub $1

>>55622144

I hope you have your own portfolio that is 100% link then.

but...why?

>>55622144
What do you mean? Chris Barrett said he's been working really hard on CCIP and that he's done a great job and his work is a great success. Given he's head of PR and Media, a blackout doesn't sound like success to me, it sounds like the total opposite, that he's been unable to secure the appropriate coverage. How can both be true? Is Chris lying? Scared for his job and making things up to try and make it look like he's actually been doing something instead of just running and posting mid-journey pictures?

>>55622197
because they're scrambling to accumulate?

come on guys there was so much time

It's so obvious why. Anyone who isn't a schizo or bagholder cuck in crypto industry understands and knows that Chainlink is a ponzi. Like all ponzis it'll meet it's demise someday, they learned their lesson with FTX so they stay away from Chainlink.

>>55622200
chris isnt the cmo retard

Next comes from Bloomberg Crypto, which was peculiar to us because Sergey appeared on Bloomberg at some point this week, but there are no accompanying articles. Here is their newsletter's most important items, other than Celsius and Ripple/SEC (this newsletter is dated for Thursday 7/20)

>>55622187
If anything this just says Link not needed. They’re saying DLTs are the future, not blockchain.
>DLTs do not require tokens to reward network participants for processing transactions or securing the network
>Token not required

>>55622144
putting in a few thousand doesnt make you a "institutional investor" you retard

>>55622144
So what's the endgame? Why the blackball?
Also can you tell us more about the institutional of interest in crypto and its particular sectors as a whole? Are they LINKpilled?

>inb4 bob from twitter screencaps this thread for more clout

>>55622236
Holy shit you’re right! I’m market selling all my 100k staked link right now

>>55622222
He's fucking responsible for all media relations you cock sucking piece of shit.

I'm an institutional investor as well, OP is my colleague. He's just LARPing, he does that all the time, people make fun of him in our office behind his back. He's probably mildly retarded as well, but can't be fired because he's the nephew of our boss. Sorry for the noise.

>>55622197
Probably because they are part of the MEV mafia.

>>55622222
checked
poo id

>>55622261
Did you read my screenshot? We are clients of Coinbase Institutional. We have hundreds of millions under management

>>55622426
it's in their best interest to keep you out while they accumulate. they will start telling you to buy after it pumps to 50-100

>>55622144
linkies have been saying this forever. even when sergey does appear on normie finance outlets he's there to discuss the industry in general while the screen flashes ticker symbols for litecoin, xrp, and doge kek. they need a paper trail so that when link moons they can say "look we told you! we hosted the chainlink guy see!" while the vast majority of their crypto content was to coerce people into buying shitcoins.

you will also see all the glowie influencers suddenly start to love chainlink (see picrelated) despite going out of their way for years to ignore it.

>>55622236
>private ledgers make public blockchains obsolete
>HAHA CHAINLINK BTFO

Never gets old.
You also have no idea what you're talking about. For instance they never say DLTs are the future or even that they're better than public chains.

>>55622187
>>55622236
That's actually a good point. If society uses more of DLTs instead of BCTs then I think those Quantards would actually have a point about not needing such a highly secure protocol like Link's CCIP to do private-private transfers since Quant's shitty API is just as secure as the two ledgers being connected.

>>55622577
>private ledgers make public blockchains obsolete
Don't they? Genuine question btw. I mean I understand why public blockchains are inherently useful and that private ledgers are pretty much redundant by nature, but if everyone adopts private ledgers then unironically what happens to the public blockchains? Who's going to use them when all the money's in private ledgers?
>For instance they never say DLTs are the future or even that they're better than public chains.
Good point.

>>55622280
In general, I seem to find my peers like Chainlink the most among what we would consider small caps. If it was listed in the equities market, it would be a microcap at its current network value. Obviously, we are not big fans of much of what makes up the top 25 projects by value. We like layer 1 projects but realize this is not going to be a 1-2 man show as interop makes layer 1 projects worth less than the tools that connect them together

I would love to reach out to Bloomberg, Coinbase, CNBC etc. and ask why they seem to blackball Chainlink. We just know it happens, and industry peers notice it too

>>55622618
Interesting. So what's your current interest in DECO and its potential use-cases; care to drop any crumbs?

Sergey pays tv networks to appear on them. That's also another reason why they blackball him. Plus everyone knows it's a ponzi.

>subtle mantle and linea shilling thread

>>55622144
>>55622163
>>55622228
not buying your bags pajeet

>>55622594
They also want to connect their private chains to public chains to access DeFi protocols securely. Quant has yet to prove themselves in the Ethereum ecosystem and banks aren't going to integrapte both Quant's tech and CCIP if it causes both a redundancy.

>>55622144
>>55622163
>>55622228
>>55622426
>>55622618
>i am the epic investor
>i am so concerned about the media blackout
>sergey literally on tv
>ccip and link literally mentioned in BofA and SWIFT reports
you are literally a nigger faggot

>>55622200
Based cisco

>>55622197
Imagine there is a very valuable asset out there. Are you going to advertise its existence and tall about how important it will be in the future? Or are you going to shut your fucking mouth and grab as much of it as you can while dismissing any mention of it from others?
Is the excessive fud on this board starting to make sense?

>>55623347
what about the excessive shilling and the 6 year long obsession of this board with this shitcoin? how did they manage to obscure the greatest investment of all time everywhere BUT here?
hmmm, really makes you think

>>55622144
thanks for telling something we already know! thank you!

>>55623367
Chainlink fud threads have outnumbered shill threads by 2:1 in the last six years. The time with the best link discussion was 2018 when this board was slow as fuck and there were few anons and little capital to pump the price.
In 2017 and earlier the anons here genuinely shared good alpha with eachother.

>>55623399
In 2017 niggas here were shilling ARK, Stellar and fucking OMG.

>>55622486
I have a hard time believing there is any serious accumulation. Yesterday two whales sent the price up 20% by spending like $6 million. Are others accumulating with their lunch money budgets?

Actual insider here. Let me tell you Chris has been hard at work and big coverage is coming. Cough cough nyt profile is coming cough cough. You didn't hear it from me.

>>55623466
+NEO+REQ+IOTA+ADA

>>55623399
you're completely delusional and/or naive

>>55622144
How does makes you feel your institutional investment ass that I own more link than you do and the fact that I wrote this posts while being in underwear?

>>55623399
The board is slower now than it was then. It's never been this slow ever

>>55623622
I remember buying 1000 LINK and the same amount in REQt. Which was 350$. Good times

>>55622618
>I would love to reach out to Bloomberg, Coinbase, CNBC etc. and ask why they seem to blackball Chainlink. We just know it happens, and industry peers notice it too
Do you have any theories on why Chainlink is blackballed? I've noticed it too.
There's a podcast called Bell Curve that Blockworks produces that frequently has on the two founders from Framework Ventures. The Framework guys run a successful Chainlink node and were very openly bullish early on but even with CCIP coming out they never discuss it on the podcast (they're on basically once per week). I can only remember Chainlink being brought up once as a subject and the host barely knew what Chainlink was and Framework kind of laughed it off and briefly reminisced about LINK memes before moving on to the next subject. I know for a fact Framework is as bullish about Chainlink as almost anyone from biz but they never bring it up. It's like stealth mode all over again.

>>55622618
Interestingly enough Bankless covered them in their newsletter today/recently, although not a peep about it on their show covering EthCC.

I really am unsure what’s going on. Maybe no one wants to shill because they just never bought? But perhaps that is slowly changing? Idk.

Or maybe there is something more sinister going on. It really is hard to say but I honestly thing it’s the former. We literally have just been that early, and link has not fit into the general populous’s theses(or crypto “experts” rather).

The reason I think this is likely the case now, where I would have gone more sinister before, is because the release of ccip has created a tone shift that I haven’t really felt before. Steady price growth will also be a self perpetuating force towards this being the case as well.

At some point you realize media is just gated marketing for VCs, and since they all missed chainlink at 0.20, they will forever refuse to endorse it

https://www.nasdaq.com/videos/enabling-secure-interoperability-between-blockchains

Chris just tweeted about bankless
Now that adelyn is gone he's next on the firing block unless he starts stepping up

>>55623898
>https://www.nasdaq.com/videos/enabling-secure-interoperability-between-blockchains

he seems like deadweight to me, like what does he even do? Tweet and run lmao

Also he prob has more link than most the poorfag anons here

>>55624020
his job is social media, retard

>>55624050
They shouldve hired a roastie, hes doing a terrible job

>>55623562
those whales are retards who don't know how to accumulate without pumping the price. plenty of retarded whales out there

>>55624073
We know link can run like that but it doesn’t happen often

>>55622144
Post link OP. Cant find which tab this is under

>>55622144
6M increased the price by 6% yesterday.
Imagine how hard it is for these institutional investors to buy a bag. If they don't have an OTC deal with Serg, they're pretty much fucked

>>55623347
>>55622211
I figured

but there is also something called human decency. 80% of finance is sickeningly morally bankrupt, and for fucking what? Pure greed, most of them don't need that much but they sell their soul anyway

>>55622197
They advertise what they want to sell, not what they what to buy.
Here's the key point: the media (any type of media) DOES NOT exist to inform you. It exist to do the will of its owners, which usually has to do with either political motivations or getting at your hard earned money.

>>55622144
>>55622166
>>55622181
>>55622187
>>55622197
>>55622200
>>55622236
>>55622261
>>55622280
>>55622297
>>55622314
>>55622324
>>55622343
>>55622486
>>55622541
>>55622577
>>55622594
>>55622682
>>55622992
>>55623200
>>55623256
>>55623347
>>55623367
>>55623386
>>55623466
>>55623562
>>55623616
>>55623622
>>55623675
>>55623676
>>55623688
>>55623720
>>55623754
>>55623809
>>55623847
>>55624020
>>55624020
>>55624050
>>55624094
>>55624365
>>55624405
>>55624480
>>55624602
Chainlink is a blatant scam, let me explain you why:
LINK's javascript has been hacked and now all the nodes are being affected, meaning they will go offline one by one.
But here's the real trick; every node that goes offline first has to be validated by other nodes, Thus the first node won't go offline until EVERY SINGLE NODE has verified it actually has gone offline
LINK will be in an infinite javascript loop. Maybe if you're a programmer you will recognize FOR and WHILE loops. Well.. This is a FOR loop that NEVER ends.
The price will TANK to at least 50 satoshi. Maybe even lower when the nodes are actually verified being offline.
Sergey is now busy setting up extra nodes to undo this process. Called contra-hacking. He has injected some GO-language code, pseudo-offline code, into the ChainLink network. This means nodes will appear the be online, while they are struggling to go offline, but in the meantime they cant because it isnt verified yet. Neat trick if you ask me, but it wont last long before the other nodes will know whats really going on.

Get into something else now

>>55622618
It's either intentional or a failure in marketing. Probably the later, with adelyn being quietly fired. Hopefully the new cmo will do much better.

>>55622144
The price (in)action speaks for itself. There's no such thing as a quintuple bottom. Assets that are trapped in a range for this long tend to be dead money.

>>55622163
There is no blackout, he just acts like a sergeant and says things like "quantitative eating" on national tv:
https://youtu.be/zMrfJgyTf68

>>55625060
kek

>>55622144
I would never trust the fags at Coinbase. Remember they tried to make their own oracle and failed miserably. They are in it for themselves and probably got a bag of VC tokens to dump on retail as long as they failed to discuss the VC’s biggest rivals. News networks discuss what is hot, link has never been hot because it never ran like SOL/BNB. Why they didn’t run a story on ccip though, I have no idea. Only guess is saying ccip is on main net for 2 shitty DeFi protocols is technically not on main net, it’s in beta. The public won’t care about a beta

>>55623720
Its the VC's and to an extent the MEV mafia as per >>55623809
Pic attached is just one example, the layerZero investors page. Note Coinbase ventures is in there, so that goes to show why someone at Coinbase (as per OPs pic) was instructed not to report on CCIP.
All of these VCs invested in L0 with the expectation of a huge % of a future token drop. They have a lot to lose by promoting CCIP over this. Long term they probably know CCIP will win, they don't give a shit, its all about milking retail liquidity in the short term.
Chainlink never took institutional investment and thats really all there is to it. There is no profit to be made reporting on it for them. The crypto media is all openly owned by the VCs just in this pic.

>>55622144
Media is not allowed to mention REDACTED by name

>>55623754
Do some game theory on "Ari Juels" Smart Contracts.
>if you know you know

>>55623754
I'm thinking about dumping all the rest of my Eth in to Chainlink, Eth is looking more and more as a brainlet play. Why does Link even need a settlement layer at this point?
I've stopped watching Bankless because of their clear bias toward grassroot punk faggots.
Even Sassal had the decency to cover CCIP/AAVE/SNX.

>>55625441
>Eth is looking more and more as a brainlet play.
definitely

>>55623347
I can't buy this one anymore. You've been saying this shit for 6 years. If big money thought this was so important, they'd already be in. They don't need to wait for next week's paycheck like the poors here

>>55623720
have you guys ever entertained the idea that people outside of here just don't think its important to the space as you do?

And even though you say they're "blackballed", I've seen tons of Forbes articles, videos on CNBC, Bloomberg, etc... Are they not the mainsteam you're looking for?

>>55624405
delusion

>>55625678
>people outside of here just don't think its important to the space
Yeah well they're objectively wrong, aren't they?

>>55622144
Crypto news outlets don't write about things they don't own. It's that simple. They do it to pump their bags. They don't own LINK so they don't talk about it.

They will be forced to buy it though. Then they will start yapping. Mark my words.

>>55624480
>but there is also something called human decency.
It's not human decency, it's journalistic integrity.

>>55625160
this seems plausible

Other outlets reported on it in their ETHCC recaps:

TechCrunch:
https://techcrunch.com/2023/07/20/ethcc-ethereum-conference-recap-paris-2023/

CoinMarketCap:
https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/64ba8e311bee1c1460932386/

>>55625699
>yeah well they're objectively wrong, aren't they?

As someone invested in Link I really hope so, but who knows. I just don't buy the massive conspiracy angle

>>55623754
>I really am unsure what’s going on. Maybe no one wants to shill because they just never bought? But perhaps that is slowly changing? Idk.

I don't buy it for a minute that Bankless doesn't own Link.

>>55625770
I don't buy the conspiracy angle either.

I do however buy the "most people are retarded sheep that only buy into things once it's pumped" angle

>>55623720
There is really nothing to gain by talking about Chainlink. It is already essential infrastructure in the crypto space. It will only become more essential as time goes on.

People will buy it because they have to buy it. There will be no way around it. That will make the price go up.

Talking about it now will just make it more expensive to accumulate, which is what everyone who knows about it wants to do.

So if you know that the price of something is basically guaranteed to increase in the future, would you promote it now to hype it for a pump and dump? Or would you keep your mouth shut so that you can accumulate more?

It's the same logic behind insider trading. There is a reason they keep their mouths shut.

>>55622144

You guys are so used to everything being a pump and dump scam that you are upset that Chainlink isn't being shilled like another pump and dump shitcoin. The fact that it's being mentioned in reputable news outlets and crypto hype men aren't talking about it is a good thing not the other way around. They hype things up because that's the only thing that makes the price go up. If you knew something would go up in price independent of what you say you would keep your mouth shut.

>>55622144
It's because Sergey loves bank chains and the DeFi primitive copies that the big bois are building. Tbh I would probably hate Sergey too if I had not gone all in on link in 2017

>>55625939
95% of the devs cannot form a big picture view about whatever they are working on. Almost everyone missed link because they didn't get it. Many still refuse to get it for psychological reasons. Many such cases. Sad

Baggies are lashing out and seething because thr pump is already over and their dopamine is drained

>>55623399
100% accurate. The Chainlink fud on biz is the most insane thing I’ve ever seen.
The way they flood any sort of discussion with their disinformation is so bizarre that I can’t wrap my head around it without going tinfoil hat.

I bought Link early at 0.15 and didn’t do much research about it. It was just part of me buying a little of everything.
As soon as I start to learn more about it, I see nothing but the most intense fud in every Link thread.
So I ended up selling 10k link for under .30 because I let the fud convince me that it was just another shitcoin.

If you put yourself in a new investors shoes, they’ll do the same thing.
That’s why the whole fud campaign has been so successful. All it takes is a little bit of untrue bullshit to turn someone off of holding Link before they get a chance to do their research and take the time to learn about it.
Thank God I was able to buy my stack back before it was too expensive, but think about how many people have missed out due to the fud.

Who knows why there’s such a massive negative narrative with Link on biz, but if it were a concerted effort by an organization, they’ve done one hell of a job.
I will never sell my link and these butthole licking faggots who spend all day fudding Link can cry about it all they want.

>>55624947
Kys

>>55623720
>>55625851
Nevermind, looks like they saw my post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yWOskeFItQ

>>55626189
Lmao is this a pasta? Havent seen this one

>>55626356
looks like a yummy fresh new batch

>>55622200
Chris is definitely running from someone or something. A jaded loved or a dark past. I think he used to head a team of black ops assassins like in the classic video game Call of Duty. This explains his non-American physique.

>>55627737
You have no idea what you are talking about schizo leave it alone.

>>55626138
Fucking kek

>>55626138
This kind of thing makes me really happy. These are the kind of people who deserve to miss out, knowing that they could have made it.

>>55625678
>have you guys ever entertained the idea that people outside of here just don't think its important to the space as you do?
That's correct actually, and is the very reason we're invested. Your fud attempt inadvertently hit the nail on the head and identified the very nature of the word 'investment' kek

Man you know what? I wont be gaslighted. Every time shills say some shit like “oh price is shit? they are LE ACOOMOLATING!”

NO. FUCK NO. I’m sick of you NIGGERS. Sergey is a nigger, Adelyn is a chink and Chainlink as a company doesn’t give a FUCK about the tokens price.

FUCK YOU NIGGERS AND IM OUT

>>55628524
>IM OUT
so is Adelyn lol

actually LINK started pumping the moment Adelyn was officially out

>>55628622
Oh a 18% pump for link over the last 7 days when FUCKING XDC NETWORK AND MAKER. TWO FUCKING RANDOM SHITCOINS PUMPED 30% OVER THE SAME PERIOD

Even fucking the fucking corn, THE FUCKING BITCORN DOUBLED IN PRICE THE LAST YEAR

FUCK CHAINLINK, FUCK SERGEY THE OBESE PIECE OF SHIT AND FUCK PAID SHILLS

NIGGERS

>>55622144
your data is right but your conclusion is wrong. it's not blackballing

>>55625939
kek what a fucking retard

>>55628524
Rock a bye fuddie, eating goyslop,
When your mom moans, she's sucking my cock.
When she does this, I pay her 1 Link,
So just keep on fudding, you dirty, fat chink.

>>55626138
the npc meme is so fucking real

>>55625939
They’re going to miss out again aren’t they. There’s a few more ‘keeping my eye on link’ posts about so they’re ready to fomo in at $50.

>>55628707
Ain’t reading all that. SUMMARIZE nigger

>>55628668
I'd love to know what you think it is then. I've just read through this thread and it seems like many aren't aware of the difference in retail and institutional buying. There are, for instance, rules in some portfolios about buying crypto that's not in the top 20, etc. due to the lack of regulation and oversight

>>55628524
>I'm out
You've said that every day for the past 5 years yet you keep buying more.
Question: why?

>>55625248
I checked out their website to see how their approach compares to CCIP and lol

don't think I need to worry about ESL scam bridges when compared to Chainlink Labs' Anglo-dominated professionalism

>>55626138
Do you understand how comfy it will be fucking jav whores and eating good sushi and wagyu everyday whilst these fucking redditors are still wage slaves?

>>55625060
No matter how successful Chainlink becomes, Sergey will never be able to escape the fat memes. I wouldn’t have it any other way.

>>55624947
>let me explain you
Stopped reading there. /biz/ is for English speaking White anons only.

>>55630113
so thats why adelyn left chainlink, she's working for layerzero now

>>55626138
>any link news gets met with hard skepticism and cynicism
>xrp, doge, sol, (insert flavor of the month vc scam/shitcoin here): were going to the moon boys. 2500 dollars per xrp is guaranteed.

>>55623622
OMG, REQ and LINK
The holy trinity

>>55625761
which is a part of human decency

if your job is lying to people so they lose money you are not a good person, you are despicable

>>55630177
kek

>>55630911
>if your job is lying to people so they lose money you are not a good person
>911
OY FUCKING VEY GOY HOW DARE YOU?

>>55623399
Just dump and buy ORE.

>>55622426
>We have hundreds of millions under management
What? That's fucking nothing. You're not an institution you're borderline retail with that much.
t. Billions under mgmt

what about anons who just found out about crypto last year and due to circumstances out of their control ( unforeseen extremely painful health condition that is rare and nothing to do with lifestyle choices that required surgery and lengthy ongoing recovery ) were unable to work and unable to buy link & don't have the funds to get any sizable stack of link - how are we going to ever make it ?

>>55631943
Go to /x/ you’ll get better advice on money and life management from them

>>55631943
Dude just get a couple of linkies now. Even 50 links could be life changing one day

>>55623720
Will check out this pod, thanks anon.

>>55631943
it's not so bad, if you look at the chart, you didn't miss much. focus on getting better, donating money to crypto open source developers is not important right now

>>55632101
Unironically this.

>>55631836
You’re not understanding. If link hits $20-22, we are at billions under management. We have 73 wallets staking for clients. Good luck

>>55622144
LINK was never meant for retail to buy into and was always meant for the elite.
They never talk about the price, they never sweat the price and they never shill the token.
For some reason, possibly related to revelation of the method, they shared the vision for LINK with this board.
Link won't moon until they let it moon, you can allow yourselves to be demoralised and to be shaken out before it happens or you can ignore their fud and just wait them out.

Their goal is to initially have shown you their plans and allowed you to buy in then to demoralise you so much that you throw that golden ticket away on the day before it comes in.

>>55631943
I feel for you. I really do.
Still, by practicing some serious financial discipline, you should be able to get a 1k stack as long as the price remains suppressed.
A lot of anons lived like paupers in the early days so they could accumulate link, and those guys are going to make it in the next cycle.
If you accumulate 1k and wait for just 2 crypto cycles like we have, you're entire financial future will change.

Honestly, you're extremely fortunate to be able to buy $8 link in 2023.
In a world where everyone isn't retarded, Link would be a top 5 market cap coin going into this next bullrun.

>>55630645
What are you basing this on exactly? Is biz your only source of news? I regularly see all those you named get shit on by twitter and reddit users. Is it possibly this “conspiracy” is just a projection of your discontent with life?

>>55631943
If youre implying you need money fast, I would look at stock options and/or altcoins sub $50M market cap. Just know that both are gambling. Link will make you money long term but imo we could still be 5+ years out

My story with chainlink begins in 2004. Someone told me something on a phone dating Chatline. I feel God will show me a sign when it's time to share my story.

>>55634392
> LINK was never meant for retail to buy into and was always meant for the elite

Sorry I have to keep calling bullshit here. Saying stuff like this is plain dishonest at this point. The entire company is funded by retail. Further, if there was such a massive elite interest, they wouldve already bought at this point. These kind of comments were valid years ago, but imo big players in the space arent that interested at this point. Feel free to show any shred of evidence of them buying in.

Maybe years down the road if pilots go well and some banks do further testing, but we arent there. Trying to explain bad price action away as a massive conspiracy hurts your credibility.

>>55636630
>These kind of comments were valid years ago,
the team lived of shit like this. They do this thing where the let the community post all this stupid shit knowing its stupid and never correcting untill after the fact.

>>55636630
>6pbtid

>>55636444
checked :^)

>they don't pay crypto media to shill
>crypto media doesn't shill them
so dumping trillions of link tokens to sustain defi is important but why does Chainlink refuse to dump link tokens to fund credible crypto journalists ???

>>55636751
Good idea anon. You should create an EIP to request that a portion of Chainlink token dumps go towards supporting the hard working journalists in the crypto industry. Only then will it get the coverage it deserves.

>>55636677
And? I hold Link, scroll up.

>>55636751
>crypto media
You realize like 20 different crypto news outlets covered CCIP release right? Google “chainlink CCIP” on google news if you dont believe me

>>55636630
I agree.
People think that these big financial institutions who will use Chainlink are these all knowing entities who have this ultimate plan.
Right now, every financial institution on the planet is worried about interest rates and the lack of new capital in the system.
They have clients' money and are worried about the diminished returns they've provided since the rate hikes.
The idea that they're going to preemptively buy up billions of dollars of link to get ahead of their tokenization efforts is farsical because they can't park that kind of money for years making no return.

That said, the tokenization of assets is going to coincide with the biggest wealth transfer in all of human history when the baby boomers start to die.
We all know blockchain is going to play a pivotal role in the next generation of global finance, and Chainlink is shaping up to facilitate the whole show.

>>55622187
Woah. Interesting.

>>55636751
I have met many crypto journalists and they are all dirt poor bums with zero integrity.
They often suffer from bouts of fatigue due to hunger and sometimes fall asleep during crypto presentations.
It is common to see crypto journalists begging outside crypto events for shitcoin dust.

Any donations would be greatly appreciated. They accept crypto, fiat, Amex, anything really.

>>55622144
Checked. Isn’t is obvious? They don’t want retail Goyim buying into LINK. Why would you actively promote and announce something that could have immense value to the financial system? It’s the inverse theory, if the bank owned media is telling you to buy something, it’s usually the opposite.

>>55636803
I dont disagree with any of this and to the point of your last paragraph, thats why we’re all here. If they actually pull this off, none of us will ever work again. The waiting is the hard part…

>>55636850
> They don’t want retail Goyim buying into LINK

Yeah…that must be why they already let you buy ICO and stake. Do yourself a favor and read through the thread before you embarass yourself

>>55636794
>>55636751
Done.
EIP 27B/6 – Proposition to Use a Portion of Chainlink Token Dumps to Fund and Sustain Crypto Journalism
>7% of all Chainlinklabs token dumps will go directly to Crypto Journalists
This is a step in the right direction.
>>55636797
Nice FUD but many crypto media outlets did not cover Chainlink CCIP release. Example Bankless covered ETHCC but only mentioned Chainlink CCIP in a tweet not in the video. So no discussion and no articles. Like >>55636835 said
>It is common to see crypto journalists begging outside crypto events for shitcoin dust.
This is totally accurate and one of the most heart wrenching moments of registering for any Crypto event IRL is getting through the dirty and tired mass of Crypto journalists.
I literally shed a tear when some zoomer came up to me when I registed for ETHCC begging for my dust
>please ser can you spare some dust?
man this is a heartless industry. I thought they were just regular homeless until my fren said, "no they are crypto journalists"

>>55636835
lmao bro i was at ethcc in paris. ripped up my GM baguette and threw it into the air and crypto journalists got there before the seagulls

>>55626356
>Lmao is this a pasta? Havent seen this one

>>55636951
they literally had signs to not do this dumbass

>>55631943
Unfortunately you can't unvaccinate yourself. Maybe you'll be able to come to the yacht party by getting a job as a waiter.

>>55636618
sounds based looking forward to hearing it

>>55631943
>>55632431

This. Don't worry about getting a "make it stack", focus on accumulating Link. The make it stacks were theorized based off of $1000 a token. This was back in 2017 back when we had no idea the scope of how big blockchain technology would be. Now our understanding has gotten much stronger thanks to the DeFi boom and we know the scale of what blockchains can do is far more massive. $81K per Link isn't unrealistic and some would dare say, really conservative. If people are busy stacking 0.0001 BTC, you have no excuse to not stack 5 Link right now.

TL;DR - ALWAYS BUY LINK

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JueL9zXEwjE&pp=ygUzS2lkcyBpbmNvcnBvcmF0ZWQgc2F5aW5nIHNvcnJ5IGRvZXNudCBtYWtlIGl0IHJpZ2h0

>>55630123
I want to coom into massive fat titty asians

>>55634392
I dont buy this. If it was always meant for the elite why was it sold on the open market?
t. Linkie

>>55633596
73x7000x22=$11M

>>55623399
Checked
You're not wrong about the better chainlink discussions, but the board was also full of retards then too shilling all sorts of shit
There's more breadcrumbs out there, the market just isn't as intense as it was for mega pumps, but it's definitely a slow climb investment in breadcrumbs these days

>>55639287
To give the world the illusion of it being open source

Layer zero is run by a scam artist. Bryan pellegrino ran a botring for years on pokerstars, full tilt, 888 and ipoker. Got caught, shamed, banned, money taken and now hes scamming crypto. Layer zero is a scam top to bottom including the humans runningit

>>55636630
>trying to explain bad price action away as a massive conspiracy hurts your credibility
Disagree
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nEPWUFgfvk

>>55639287
They do a lot of weird shit for weird superstitious/occult reasons.

People assume that the elites are hyper rational beings that are made of pure logic but they're actually fucking nuts and obsessed with magic and the occult.