/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55617780
XRP mindbroke them so thoroughly that they've been on a furious retard rampage for days and this is one of many outbursts, they think acting like totally not mad and insane people is gonna make them rich, though they would hold both and chill if they actually cared about making money

>>55617805
Or maybe it was the 20% daily candle they are happy about?

>>55617805
What does xrp have to do with this? Also no one says link is used in this. This is just a boomer fed thing

>>55617780
CCIP can connect that to digital assets across any blockchain. Instant bank to bank money transfers are just one more on ramp for Chainlink (Ticker: LINK) services.

FedNow will settle in bitcoins
linkies can get rugged

>>55617826
Xrp is literally mentioned as one of the ways fednow remits

>>55617780
kek fuddies dont know

>>55617847
ctrl f 0 kek

>>55617847
Source ?

>>55617849
You in the telegram? Sky banned me, what’s he been saying

>>55617847
No, they say Ripple CAN be used. not your shitcoin

>>55617859
Not that anon but hes probably talking about pic related

>>55618032
what date was this ?

cause they say their using SWIFT and chainlink is making swift connect with blockchains, so next generation cross board not neeeded

>>55618032
Thanks for the source.
>>55618020
And the context

>>55617835
XRP has already been doing this for years.

>>55618032
As far as I can tell this is a fintech or bank or something that is certified to use the fednow service, which basically allows transactions between banks to settle in a few seconds compared to clearing normally by close of business.

One of the ways in which they allow people to transact, using fednow, is via Ripple/ presumably xrp. So it’s more like xrp can use fednow rather can fednow using xrp kek

>>55617805
What is this ridiculous new fuddie talking point? NOBODY who holds Link ever brings up XRP. We don't think about that garbage at all.

>>55618224
lol

>>55618224
lol clearly

>>55617849
Imagine sending this pic back in time to mid 2017-2018. What would anons think... Imagine this being TRUE back in 2017!! Link would have been $1000+ off of the headline ALONE!

>>55618228
>>55618261
How are you guys serious? Absolutely kekkable. LINK threads are notoriously LINK centric. As you've just done yourselves, XRP baggies have a habit of bringing their own shit into a conversation then claiming everyone's talking about them, like a girl with BPD in high school. And don't get me wrong, LINK baggies have started to display the same schizoid narcissism in that regard, but that's because they themselves are obsessed the same way you weirdos are.

>>55618928
July 20, 2020
>BTC: $9320
>LINK: $7.25
>ETH: $236
>SOL: $0.87
>BNB: $18
>DOGE: $0.003
>TRX: $0.01
>MATIC: $0.02
>LTC: $44
>XLM: $0.09
>ADA: $0.11
>XRP: $0.19
>XMR: $69

July 20, 2023
>BTC: $29,920
>LINK: $8.27
>ETH: $1,900
>SOL: $25.59
>BNB: $244
>DOGE: $0.07
>TRX: $0.08
>MATIC: $0.77
>LTC: $93
>XLM: $0.17
>ADA: $0.32
>XRP: $0.80
>XMR: $165

>>55619388
This
Xrp tard are will forever have to bring up link because they’re always gonna be salty about the swift and ccip connection

>>55619411
I find posts like this so bizarre. Anons apparently bearish on LINK go out of their way to research and prepare a comparison of 13 cryptos between two dates through which everyone already knows LINK underperformed specifically to demoralise LINK holders? They then routinely update prices and this going on for months to years now? There's at least one in every LINK thread. Never comparing say August 20 2018 to July 20 2020 when LINK nearly 40xd BTC... yeah, doesn't exactly seem like the actions of those uninterested in LINK, or if it is certainly not of someone mentally sound.

Talk about "mindbroken". It's no wonder I turned bullish on this shitcoin. The fudding is easily the most unhinged I've seen for any asset in my life.

>>55619411
/thread

How are culties euphoric right now

Chainlink is a scam. It's a centralized project that's controlled by a small group of devlopers. The devs can do whatev'r they want with the code, and there's no guaranty that the project will be around in the long term.

Additionally, Chainlink's use of centralized oracles makes it vulnarable to manipulation and corrupion. The oracles that provide data to smart contracts are all controled by third parties, so there's no guaranty taht the data is accurate or reliable.

Finally, Chainlink's reliance on a centralized oracle network makes it difficult to scale the network. As the number of smart contracts that use Chainlink increases, the network will become more congested and slower. This could lead to delayes and error's in the execusion of smart contracts.

In short, Chainlink is a risky investment. There are alot of better projects out there that are more decentralize and transparent. I would stay away from Chainlink if I were you.

P.S. If you're still not convinced, just look at the price chart. Chainlink has benn in a downtrend for the past year. That's not a good sign.

>>55617805
>though they would hold both and chill if they actually cared about making money
exactly

>>55619729
thanks just sold 100k

And that's the third XRP baggy coming into a LINK thread to shill XRP while claiming the obsession goes the other way around.

>>55619753
they're both dank, I'm double stacked

>>55619750
Thanks!

Chainlink is a centralized project with a small group of developers making all the decisions. The community is little more than a cult of personality around the project's founder, Sergey Nazarov.
Chainlink's price is highly volatile and has been subject to pump-and-dump schemes. This makes it a risky investment for most people.

The Chainlink community is often accused of being cult-like. This is due to the fact that many holders are extremely devoted to the project and refuse to listen to any criticism. They often dismiss FUD as being spread by "haters" or "trolls."

There is no doubt that Chainlink has some potential. However, the risks associated with the project are too high for most investors. The community's cult-like behavior is also a major red flag.

>>55619793
Thanks just bought 100k

>>55619793
>They often dismiss FUD as being spread by "haters" or "trolls."
No, they often dismiss FUD as being spread by Bulgarians.
Get it straight.

>>55619498
Retard