/biz/ - Business & Finance

whales are pro-censorship anti-organic community now anon

>>55592075
link will never be allowed to moon again
simple as that

>>55592116
>>55592109
The argument it’s owned by too many racist incels is odd though. So is bitcoin. Sam Hyde bought it at 300 (yes that’s relatively late but there were many people on le incel chud forums shilling BTC 10-12 years ago)

>>55592075
>>55592109
>>55592116
It's boring AF but with ccip launching its means it's going to be slow. BTC will go up with halving, there's nothing anyone can do about that, and all of crypto will go up with it, it's just a question of how high link can get. I'd be happy with 30 desu, but with ccip and more demand for link, who knows. They can only do so much if ccip goes bananas and everyone wants to use it

>>55592075
>chainlink does thing no one cares about
>no one cares
>linkies: OMG!!! ITz DA JOOOOZZZZ!!!!!!!11111 MANIPULATING DA MARKETz!!!!!!

No at this point it's fucked. SmartCon with Eric Schmidt, nothing. Staking announcement, nothing. Staking launch, nothing. CCIP launch, nothing.

We haven't been double digit price for how long? Fuck all of this, would be better off buying NVidya stonk or fag shit like Solana

>>55592075
The heat waves recently have been man-made, not how you think though - think military tech where the government can flick a switch to increase temperature but not decrease it - to FUD cryptocurrency and Chainlink more importantly. The government is scared of Chainlink. They know what is coming…

>>55592075
It’s absolutely incredible that it happens every single time.
It’s one of the most blatant and egregious cases of financial manipulation in the history of finance.

>>55592205
Show me data that blockchain tech uses more energy than running Netflix servers.

you altmaxis are obsessed with bitcoin for all the wrong reasons
bitcoin isn't manipulating the rest of the market
bitcoin just is the market

>>55592514
so "the market" just happens to dump at the exact time any bullish news hits for link. It's exhausting.

>>55592139
that image gets reposted so much i just have to comment
that isnt about price or investors/speculators holding the token, that is about actually network usage which incurs computational demands
hoarding tokens does not, so if neet schizo put the token into cold storage and the price moons while the network itself has a slow steady adoption rate that isnt a problem
tl;dr that isnt abour price

>>55592539
>responding to a blatant kek fuddie
ishygddt

>>55592607
chart

>>55592613
kek fuddie that doesn't bother me. My life is great, I don't spend my every waking hour worrying about the price. I don't need this. I bought very low, I have a lot of patience. I will simply wait. I do like that this is what it boils down to, though. This is, the last refuge of a desperate fudder, the price. When the price is at 3 digits you'll disappear, so it's a little unfair, but I'll continue to live well while you'll have roped so that evens things out. Enjoy your meagre existence of watching porn and fudding Chainlink kek fuddie.

>>55592633
>massive cope
kek

>>55592638
I hurt you and it took me 20 seconds. I'm untouchable, you could spend 4 hours crafting a post and it would bounce off of me, because my life doesn't rely on or revolve around Chainlink. Go ahead and post another one word response, I'm going to continue enjoying my blessed existence. :)

>>55592648
>absolutely seething
lmao
chart

>>55592638
Cope not needed. Link has already begun it's climb. Soon you'll be calling it a $10 stable coin. Then you'll say "Muh $20, It's still down 60%!!!!" Next you'll say "$30, ha it's still lower than it was in 2021!" All the while you're maniacally laughing to yourself as you buy the next apeshitdogpisscatpukecoin. "Ha another bull run and Link could only hit $200. Fucking losers! 1k eoy muuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhh" you post for the 14th time today.

>>55592075
yes schizo, it's all a big conspiracy against link

>>55592682
if link is at 50, it will be like $200+ to make a ccip transaction :/

>link incels
>long, emotional cope posts
>please believe that i'm happy

>>55592699
decimals

>>55592075
>I fear what is coming next on the release

>>55592075
Nexo would have gone bankrupt a long time ago if a bigger player didn't bail them out with their BTC dumps.
Think about it.
It does not make sense from a rational perspective to suppress a small market cap project with a 1 trillion asset, unless you have unlimited money and use it to keep your power and/or think Chainlink is worth a lot more than Bitcoin at 1 trillion.

>>55592648
sorry bro but u are sounding emotional here :-/

I'm pretty sure this fucking coin is cursed. It's paranormal just how much bad luck it has. Sergey must have a lot of karmic debt accrued from his past lives, I'm starting to believe he was Ivan the Terrible reincarnated or something.

I'm honestly afraid of what the implications of $ARKM adopting CCPI will bring in the future. Might sell right before the end up implementing it.

>...

>>55592701
imagine being so angry not only at chainlink ticker link but at life itself enough to make this drawing, call it "linktrannycuckold" and post it anonymously

drink water

>>55594864
>EVERYTHING I TOUCH DIES!!!

>>55594821
safest bet. just take it out and look at the price action after a day or two.
>red karmic energy
scamming a whole generation of retards is pretty bad imho.

>>55592109
THIS is your new Bitcoin whale! Say something nice about him :)
>>55592648
Normally, happy and mentally sound people don't hold the same bleeding asset for years, dump after dump, posting about how happy they are. See: >>55592701

>>55594821
Arkham should be fine for the time being. The inclusion of LINK's CCIP tech is just logistics. Unless this shit is actually cursed and it kills Arkm entirely.

>>55592514
>>55592514
>>55592514
>>55592514
and im guessing nobody ever manipulates bitcoin at all. no sir, not here.
>>55594858
>>55594867
based

>>55594821
>>55594909
i bought post ico price i fucking hope this shit doesnt die on me i swear im going to set up bot farms to post gore on link threads until they are all taken down i dont care if i spend hundreds in passes

(mods and jannies this post here is a joke and satire do not take this post seriously thank you)

>>55594821
What the fuck did you just say? Those glowies are using CCIP???

>>55592633
PSA to all - whenever you notice a group of bagholders pivot to virtue signaling/giving life advice/lashing out against those who don't view the investment as a cult, it's one of the biggest signs it's over and you're probably going to lose money. The changes happen gradually but become more apparent as time passes/you take breaks from the space and then return. The tone of Link posts today is drastically different than even 2 years ago.


Psychologically, this pivot helps protect the ego from the potential reality that their investment isn't the genius grand slam they thought it was. This is where you'll see a retelling of the original thesis if you will, where they talk about how all of the current problems were foreseen and baked into the original plan ("dude the whitepaper talked about this"), the original price predictions were just an inside joke, and it was always an extremely (decade+) long term investment. This is also where you'll see a lot of twitter personalities talk about all the self-help type stuff they're now doing, and how the coin being in a permanent bear market is actually a good thing. Doing such allows them to retain "guru" status amongst their followers, but is often referred to as "cope" on certain underground Mongolian weaving forums.

>>55595204
>VCS WILL PIVOT BACK TO CRYPTO AND PUMP MUH BAGS
They're not coming back baggie enjoy youre tokens YOU WERE EARLY

>>55592426
Funny how BTC dropping a whopping 2% didnt seem to bother XRP much. Maybe Link is just a little too limp, if you know what I mean. Just like its holders

>>55595204
The whole crypto market is in a bear market you tard. Heck, everything that isn't am S&P 500 stock is in a bear market. LINK's performance is not special or indicative of anything.

>>55592075
>LINK was pumping against the market by itself, and right on cue.
The conversation around BTC dumping every time LINK shows strength has always revolved around whether or not it's happening, but I haven't heard any compelling arguments with screenshots indicating who could potentially be behind it. Both fuddies and shills agree that it happens, even if fuddies gaslight the shills after the fact.

>>55595204
Everything that Chainlink is building is in direct response to demands from large corporate entities and banking institutions. They want to be connected to public blockchains, but they don't want that to be their core network. As far as they are concerned they can maintain their own private chain and do high frequency shit on their own with internal or bridged assets. What they do need is an on/off ramp into public blockchains that is not backed by some sketchy jeet or a Chinese exchange. You have a time now where at least in the US non mega banks are absolutely desperate to find a way to pad their assets to not go out of business and offering crypto custody along with being an on ramp themselves while cutting out the exchanges is now a turnkey option.
This is not a small thing and when the transactions start flowing you will never buy. You have been programmed with the idea that "it will dump again". But it won't dump this time, from retail needing a small bag to pay gas to interact with new dapps to institutions buying for speculation and gas it will just keep pumping.
I remember the exact thing happening with ETH in the teens, people just sat back and watched it in disbelief.

>>55595230
Id say it is special, in that by buying Link, you specifically go out of your way to lose money

Jan 1 prices
Xrp 35 cents
Btc 16,500
ETH 1,200
Link 5.6

Today

Xrp .79
Btc 30,104
Eth 1,914
Link 6.9

In summary, anyone who bought Link over other cryptos in the last year has left somewhere between 35-100%+ gains on the table. A horrendous outcome for anyone investing sizeable amounts (so not biz)

>>55595246
The only gaslighting fuddies should stick to are the gas lamps in their third world slum villages and favelas. They are like flies constantly buzzing around stinky linkies to try and annoy them. Retard tier manipulation compensated for by spamming it over and over and over and over and over and over. They really are insects.

>>55595297
>e everyone is brown, r right guys? Guys!?!

What typically follows in these scenarios, is a schism is created amongst the investor base between those unhappy with price performance, and those who think the company can do no wrong, let's call them "loyalists". To the loyalist, it is not necessarily important whether they make money, at least not in the short-term, rather they value the emotional experience of being involved with this particular investment community. Typically a loyalist will modify several aspects of their personal life to reflect participation in the community, as well as valuing the executive team and other high profile members of the community greater than their own immediate family. Given this extremely strong relationship, any attempt to criticize the actual investment and/or it's community will be ill received by the loyalist, who will oftentimes believe the criticism to originate from nefarious intent. This phenomenon is referred to as "Paranoid Personality Disorder" (PPD) in mental health circles

>>55592699
Imagine being this retarded.

>>55592165
>Eric Schmidt
>Staking
>CCIP

Bitcoin dumped on every single one of these. Often multiple times.
Pic related.

Chainlink = ICP
both have great fundamentals but dumps by devs stop any upside movement

>>55595228
>BTC dropping a whopping 2% didnt seem to bother XRP much
XRP dropped 11%, Link only 4%.

>>55596243
>dumps by devs
You mean Bitcoin devs, right?

>>55595291
>big news for XRP
>Bitcoin pumps

>big news for Link
>Bitcoin dumps

Not hard to see.

>>55596298
>big news that effects the entire crypto market via a judge saying crypto isn't a security
vs
>muh ccip, something that's only a value add to stink link
lmfao dumbfuck baggie

>>55592165
Maybe you're overhyping and wrong

>>55595287
Eth had its run because it didnt have any competition for liquidity, when eth was created there was less then a dozen alts. Link will never have a eth run because there are tens of thousands of different shitcoins which money entering crypto gets split amongst. Many people dont even fuck with altcoins these days, its all meme coin meta now.
Link is too late, its just altcoin #3826/50,000+.
Eth only had its run because it was pretty much the only option, the only other coin that had a good run from that time is monero.

Theres just far too many new alt coins distracting everyones attention, hell even bitcoin gets cucked by shitcoins because theres less money flowing into it.

>>55592075
This should give you more resolve. This is the reason I will never fucking sell. They are accumulating massive karmic debt for nothing

The more people are saying dont buy this the more I start to believe its gonna make it

>>55596342
>a judge saying crypto isn't a security
Are you retarded? The SEC and CFTC have repeated many times that crypto in general isn't securities but commodities, specifically mentioning things like Litecoin, tether, ETH, Bitcoin, ...

And CCIP does affect the entire crypto market, it's literally the cross-chain standard Swift is working with.

>>55596350
>overhyping
Then why did they have to dump Bitcoin every single time?

>>55596613
>The more people are saying dont eat dogshit the more I start to believe its gonna taste good

yeah

>>55592075
>LINK was pumping against the market by itself
and now it's following the market down. what's the problem?

>>55592745
I genuinely fear what's to come that is enabled by CCIP. The public blockchain world will be siloed from the private blockchain world until Chainlink deems them ready.

>>55596613
weird how that works, right? the opposite is also true: when there are plenty of idiots saying that it will moon, you want to sell. it's well known, so if you read cheap fud, it's clear that it's other bagholders doing it to elicit a spite buying response from green investors. if they really wanted you to sell, they'd write bad shill posts

>>55596509
cool midwit take

>>55596342
There is 0 fear of bitcoin being a security, not even Gary himself has ever suggested it. There is no reason BTC should pump based on the XRP ruling, but it did. Similarly, there is no reason BTC should dump on CCIP launching, but it did.

>>55594821
let me tell you this:
I am stuck on the bell curve with only 125 IQ. I bought link in ICO with the last $1000 I had. I lost half of it on bancor.
I never had or have any luck in any parts of my life.
poor, bald, skinny, always sick, old, no sex, no kiss, no friends, no loving family, no fulfilling job, basically genetic dead end.

But I love holding chainlink. Knowing I will never make it.

>>55598594
>I am stuck on the bell curve
everyone is stuck on the bell curve, anon. i wouldn't be so sure about those 125 points