/biz/ - Business & Finance

> -2.3%

>>55574807
That explains why it's pumping so hard

>>55574807
>.005 link fee
l-linkies, CCIP gonna create so much link demand ! Lmao, I can’t believe this shit. I am literally in disbelief. It’s over.

>>55574828

>>55574828
>Fee: 0.24 LINK
Kek fuddies not even trying to read

what a piece of garbage lol, just sold everything

>>55574838
>.001 LINK

Lol, lmao even

I will say the explorer is neat, looks like link really is coming for everyone’s lunch. Ccip eventually gonna be what normies think is L1

>>55574838
That's like 50 cents lol

>fee: 0.000000000000001 LINK

>>55574863
Transaction fees on avalanche are always that cheap. I wonder how much link will be charged on ETH

>>55574828
>>55574834
>>55574845
>>55574852
>>55574863
>>55574881
Here comes the damage control

and yet the price is el doomping :}
looks like CCIP was just another dud :}
oh, so sad stinkies. better luck NXT time :} (see what i did thar? :} )

>$6,61
KEK BAGGIES

>>55574884
It's higher on ETH

>>55574807
Sisters... no one cares...

https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0xbb4d2a4c9091d81f1be838a3bdd8f4207189bde8e9d9e3c2c76f7b955d18c608
THERE IS MORE

>>55574807
>>55574834
>>55574852
>ccip fee AND gas
gas is like 90% of transaction cost, enjoy your 0,00000001 link per transaction baggies

>>55574889
Damage control? You mean like the cult has been in every day while it has bleed 90% for 3 years straight? Kek.

Who remembers that FSS uniswop screencap a few weeks ago before it made a lower low in sats/usd and eth kek.

There is no “damage control” for this bleeding piece of shit token. Its already fucked and dumped 90%.

I welcome it actually pumping for once but we both know thats not fucking happening lol

>>55574932
quiet, stinkie
we dont need your excuses
we see "CCIP" and it sucks
price action = el d00mp :}

>>55574928
the point is that people need LINK to use it retard.

From now on you don't need ETH to interact with Ethereum, or AVAX or MATIC to interact with polygon or avalanche. You just need LINK and you're set.

Why doesn’t it give any information on the tx line which tokens moved, just says from which chain to which something happened, or am I missing something? Also doesn’t like we’re live yet, these are all testnet tx’s

>>55574944
>From now on you don't need ETH to interact with Ethereum, or AVAX or MATIC to interact with polygon or avalanche. You just need LINK and you're set.
wow the price of link must be el pumping then:}
is it over $10 yet? surely so :}

@everyone in your groups, lets fuck the cultists up.

>>55574948
>these are all testnet tx’s

L O L

>>55574959
unironically it will be within a month and you will look like a retard for posting now instead of buying.

>>55574944
i need like 1 link token to make thousands of transactions
this will surely offset 70 million sirgay dump kek baggie

how much is 0.001 link times number of transactions by Swift daily? we'll run out of link pretty fast as I'm never selling

>>55575010
That's like 50 Link ($300)

typical link. best news ever and -75% on the charts.

thanks sergey. i should've sold at 50.

So uh…what now?

>>55575043
We go to 0

>>55574928
>>55574852
>>55574828

if gas is $50 and it costs 0.001 LINK to pay the NOPs, what is the price of LINK?

>>55575018
Sergey always dumps into any liquidity spike

>>55575068
$1keoy?

Fulltime fud trannies screeching and crying on multiple ids right now, upon realizing how many transactions are going to take place on ccip, every single one of then requiring the chainlink token
And this is just the start
We're going to be so fuckin rich bros

>>55575128
Not collaterised. You're not getting a cent on these transactions.

>>55575128
every single time

>>55575147

English please?

>>55575128
I wonder psychologically how no-linkers that actively fud will feel when we moon.

>>55575120
I swear linkies need to realize, that even IF they are right about any of their shit that link will NOT go up in price in appreciable levels until sergey is illiquid. at current rates that'll still take about 5 years and that is if sergey doesn't just print more.

>>55575154
>when we moon

>>55574807
To whom it may concern:

These stupid fucking ccip, arbitrum and chainlink shitcoins are not some magical path to my wallet
I'm not interested in your shitcoin and tossing word salad at me with a Linkpool/Arbitrum/Chainlink meme isn't going to convince me to invest.
I'm not interested in your meme token and tossing word salad at me and telling me not to miss out (trying to prey on FOMO, what a piece of shit) isn't going to convince me to buy your heavy bags.
Posting these stupid fucking faggot memes is not a free pass. It doesn't make your bullshit cool and hip, it makes you a manipulative faggot who took a meme and tried to capitalize on it
Very few coins have actual practical uses, and most of those practical uses are buying drugs. Most of it is a thinly veiled pump and dump scheme weakly propelled by globohomo memes.
I'm putting my fucking foot down. You stinky linkie fucking pajeets, turks, finns and russians are getting called out.
Stop pushing Schwabs fucking retarded agenda for your grift.

>>55575010
46.000.000 per day

>>55575184
Based fuck these faggots

>>55575166
>if he doesnt print more
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

nolinkers seething

>>55575128
Looks like I really riled them up with this one - not that that's hard to do lmfao

>>55575212
after all that possibility is NOT ruled out in the white paper and if we go by how much of a fuck he doesn't give about people buying link it certainly isn't beyond him.

>>55575016
50.000 link per day for swift alone

where do the link fee go

>testnet

It’s all so tiresome. I think I will close my eyes for a second.

>>55575232
Oh didnt know swift was already using chainlink, i guess the price must be el poomping then ;^^}

>>55575232
oh that explains why it's pumping so hard

>>55574807
How did he knew

>>55575250
>>55575248

when its live you dense fuckers

>>55575247
>>testnet
pic literally from the OP

>>55575256
two more weeks?

>>55575252
>9 days ago
by being OP and having found this earlier.

>>55575262

yes and it wont pump from this alone because that's only 121.545.000 per year. with one user (swift)

>>55575257
Shut up retard

>>55575295
YOU can sign up for testnet.
Doesn't change the fact that others are making mainnet CCIP transactions.

>>55575257
Probably mainnet v0.0001 at smartcon if we are lucky

>>55575295
There are mainnet transactions being made as we speak, deal with it faggot.

>>55575322
see >>55575312

>>55574944
NO ONE, needs, LINK. Period.
Furthermore the token isn't needed.

>>55575326
>>55575333
>sign up for mainnet early access
>testnet open to all on July 20

Based retards

>>55575295
Is its finally here and dumping lol
Staking was the last highly anticipated event and it resulted in lower lows 5 months later

>>55574948
Well Kemal did say something like they were first going to be released on "mainnet beta" (whatever that means) first, and then at the end of the year will be full-scale general release.

>>55575121
We're not hitting $1k/Link until staking expands, sadly.

>>55575367
CCIP is mindbreaking the fuddies

Link at $6.66 as the CCIP web page and block explorer go live. Coincidence?

>>55575421
It is coincidence because LINK is held at $6.66 all the time. The fact that LINK itself is $6.66 so often though is not a coincidence.

>>55575398
I remember what happened last time something was slated for a fullscale release by end if year.

We got a version 0.1 and nothing at all

>>55575428
And right now we have CCIP live on mainnet.

>>55575415
It's real. Everyone can go to the Lane Status page and see for themselves.

>>55575437
Correction: we have a Sergey cock sucker suckling on the dick for more breadcrumbs

fun fact for linkies: No one needs LINK. No one uses LINK. No one cares about LINK. You can get price data directly from Uniswap pools (calculateETHin and out). No ONE NEEDS LINK and no one talks about it. ONLY YOU BAGGIES. HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAAHA

>>55574852
it's huge, I can also remember FUD regarding tx fees being too high for link to scale adoption, now it is FUD that link is the new eth gas if you want to use secure cross chain dapps lmao

>most important release in crypto history
>dumps

>>55575442
in real time avalanche mainnet was just added.

>>55575447
No, we literally have CCIP live on mainnet.

Check the fee too.

It's a testnet retards. Mainnet will probably get released in 7 years and that’s if the testnet doesn't fail.

Holy shit - transaction on mainnet!!!!
ccip.chain.link/msg/0x1ce1c62a2091ba0fb6069bb4095fe14cb70f867175c0e6503b5ebc2e9212e9c8
> Destination Gas and CCIP Fee
4.085518475446634 LINK

We're gonna make it bros

>>55575474
>testnet
Nope

big for defi ngl

so CCIP is live, eh? wonder why the price is so... dead :}

>>55575474
I'm thinking Link is a good token

>>55575481
It’s two test transactions on mainnet. Doesn’t mean it’s live and available for the public

>>55575474
even in the face of proof with links and pictures, the fudder still denies and posts misinformation. astounding to witness them in the wild.

>>55575508
No shit, nobody said it's available to the public yet. It's on mainnet though, this is indisputable.

>>55575508
>It’s two test transactions on mainnet.
what makes you say that?

>>55575514
it's a testnet that does transactions on the mainnet of other chains, stinkie
not that hard to understand

So now that ccip got released and didn't affect the price. what's the next cope?

>>55575514
The price action is fud enough. This was supposed to be the final catalyst for a pump. If nothing happens to LINK now it will be years and years before you even get to ath you disgusting little cretin. Fudders are trying to educate and save you from your cult, shithead.

CCIP in Paris

>>55575531
>it's a testnet that does transactions on the mainnet
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>55575537
wow, calm down anon your irrational anger is showing

>>55575537
this :}
hope you all enjoy the agonizing years of not mooning, watching OTHERS moon, being broke forever, unable to afford basic things like decent housing :}
CCIP was your ONE shot. and ya blew it

>>55575472
Muh breadcrumbs

Your a fucking basement dwelling twat.
The devs obviously have access to mainnet - and they want ti establish and test on it well in advanced of full release.

It says on their own fucking website: TESTNET on 20th July and has been slated for a release end of year if it even comes.
You have no work experience and have no idea how this shit works fucking retard. Keep sucking on breadcrumbs from sergeys gaping dumping asshole.

Btw, the gas the chainlink dev team are using to test it on mainnet is funded from dumps on bagholders

>>55575542
if it's mainnet then it's even worse, that means ccip does not increase demand for token

Imagine what a boom the shitcoin casino will receive once CCIP swaps are online? A uniswap/pancakeswap where you can swap between all shitcoins on any chain with minimal fees. There goes your barrier to entry that keeps the normies out of non-cex bsc/eth shitcoins.

>>55575428
It is unironically different this time.

>>55575563
Yeah and link will still hover around $7

>>55575551
>Muh breadcrumbs
What?

>It says on their own fucking website: TESTNET on 20th July
For the general public, yes.
But literal mainnet transactions are happening right now.

>>55575464
I can also remember 5 years ago when LINK was $6.

IMAGINE putting your life on hold for 5 years promising you will make it only to see your hopes and dreams defecated upon by a fat fuck from Russia with no technical talent and no useful product.

>>55575559
>if price goes down, that means demand is increased
Boy you should take a look at the demand for ETH gas when ETH is dumping.
The harder ETH dumps, the more demand for ETH spikes.

CCIP will release on Mainnet beta first. I think Kemal meant that CCIP (full-featured) will release on only a few chains at first. At the end of the year CCIP will expand to more chains.

So what does the user front-end looks like?

>>55575479
He paid 4 links and its been stuck for 15 minutes

We are so Gonna make it Bros, fudders rekt hard.

Here let me spell it out for you retards:

CCIP IS NOW LIVE ON MAIN NET FOR EARLY ACCES USERS (You are also able to request becoming one right now)

July 20 EVERYONE will be able to experiment with CCIP in a test net environment.

Later this year CCIP is open to everyone on main net.

but most importantly: CCIP is live right now on main net for early acces users which should generate some buzz in the coming days.

>>55575580
why would you assume I have no other investments or occupational income, very strange

>>55575537
>fudder that said ccip isn't live on mainnet is trying to educate. proceed to talk about price of token to double down on fud.
you all need to be put down.

>>55575599
shut up, neet who is all in link
we all know the patheticness of your life

>>55575599
Link is literally the only thing these fudders can ever think of.
It occupies their mind day and night.

A toast to this historic moment gentlemen, the suns glow is warming the horizon.

Pic attached is the first ever documented fuddy duddy. How many other nematodes just like patient zero here came and went with no success in separating you from your treasure.

>>55575575
Your brand of autism distinctly sounds like the faggot cultist who always whines how other projects dumped more than sergey so you will continue to suck him off.
Or the one(probably the same) who always spams muh btc suppression charts. In reality Sergey just dumps at those moments all along

>be sergey
>be a scared little kitten of the SEC
>try to time your dumps of LINK when BTC dumps to try argue in court later if you need to that you intentionally tried to get lower prices

>>55575614
Seeth harder, poorfag. You will never be able to afford an OG stack

In EthCC Sergey will flip the switch on of the (((early access))) users on mainnet.

We will see 1000+ tx / per second on stage and the LINK/USD chart will print a 5000% green dildo as the transaction fee's market buying kicks in. Then Sergey will unzip his pants...
> see see I pee

Holy shit. Im a poorfag with only 1,300 link and was trying to reach 2k oh well. If we moon now at least I got suicide stack

>>55575479
>ETH gas fees on CCIP are paid for in LINK

What the fuck does this mean?

>>55574807
>-3.64%
awesome!

>>55575630

>>55575631
ooo the baggie seethe is coming out :}
i have nothing to seethe about. YOU on the other hand must cope + seethe about CCIP being a nothing burger. as usual :}

>>55575652
You know how people speculate on ETH because it's used as gas in small amounts on the Ethereum network? Like the price appreciation of Ethereum isn't actually due to the gas usage for shitcoin swapping, but people see the shitcoin swapping and want extra ETH for the future. Well CCIP is going to be the entire cross-chain ecosystem, with every swap and message paid entirely in LINK (with some dumped in order to pay gas fees, of course). What happens when people see that they need LINK to do cross chain swaps? They get a little extra, of course. Or maybe they get a whole bunch, just in case.

>>55575186
show math pls

>>55575660
You will never again see sub $1 link again and you will have to live with that

>>55574911
So every ~100 transactions = ~1 link in fee revenue. Unless CCIP is doing hundreds of millions of transactions a day this is a nothing burger

Should I just switch to XRP?

>>55575677
That doesn't sound as enticing as the shitcoin casino ETH created.

>>55575677
That just means eth is useless now and that is extremely bearish for erc20 tokens like chainlink

Oh wow multichain transactions between 6-10 ghostchains and eth, really a big achievement here. Congrats stinkies, you sropped ue life for 5 years to accomplish and invest in something no one wants. Seethe harder. Meanwhile ICP can do direct BTC transactions and soon ETh will be integrated as well. Looks like they opted for actual multichain and not gay evm scamchain clones lol. Token not needed

>>55575699
ETH is just as needed as ever, you didn't even read my post. How do you think a blockchain works?

>>55575698
See >>55575563
Nobody will use single chain casinos anymore, it will all move to CCIP (or if they don't, they will die and new CCIP casinos win out)

>>55575706
don't worry seether we will incorporate your ghostchain (which is lower in mcap or usage than the 6 ghostchains you mentioned) soon enough

>>55575698
>CCIP doesn't sound as enticing as the shitcoin casino ETH created.

Looks like gas and CCIP fees can be paid in the native chain token but at a higher cost.

>>55575718
Why would i want to transfer from eth ti any of those ever

>>55575726
mega bullish, 10%? That's going to be more than slippage any day. Where did you find this?

>>55575726
the "higher cost" is the cost to transact it for link lmao

>>55575682

sorry, i was only giving total transactions of swift per day according to google.

so 46000000*0.001*(current price) 6.66= 306.360 dollars per day*365= 111.821.400 dollars per year.

>>55575726
AS WE FUCKING TOLD YOU OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN
I remember fudders saying
>lol people will just pay in other tokens, chainlink token not needed
Yeah go ahead and pay that juicy 10% premium you absolute retard lmao. We'll put it to good use, promised.

God I am SO glad I staked 3 full wallets. Fuck fudders, we are all going to make it.

>>55575793
>real math now: $0 per day

>>55575803
10% premium is worth it to never touch your stanky ass token

>>55575747
I am reading the CCIP docs, under architecture and docs. https://
docs.chain.link/ccip/architecture

>>55575807

real real math now, that means at current price and current fee swift needs to pay:
111.821.400 / 365 / 6.66 = 46000

Why is the number going DOWN

>>55575824

46000 link per day, for one partner, for one function

That link fee will come from the supply that isn't in the circulation, ccip is bearish af

>>55575811
You dumb ESL nigger ass cannot yet understand that it gets AUTOMATICALLY CONVERTED into LINK?

>yeah I'll gladly pay 10% more but I didnt buy LINK directly so who's really winning?
>*native token and 10% premium gets instantly exchanged for LINK*
>h-heh, that will show those stinkies :}

You are the retard that ALWAYS uses curly braces for smileys, aren't you? How does it feel to know that all the time you spent was for naught? We will give you time to translate that sentence into your third world language, go ahead.

>>55575857
Users directly pay all fees, including gas.
As is already the case with VRF, automation, functions, ...

>>55574807
>>55574962
>>55575468
>>55575587
interesting that no bridge to arbitrum mainnet is live when avax and op are.
>tfw felten betrayed
>>55575541
chris you faggot go back
>>55575811
checked and will-pay-a-premium-pilled

I AM SO POOR BUT I WILL BE SO RICH
750 LINK MARINE
FUDDERS SUCK MY $100 MILLION COCK

>>55575803
A 10% fee between L2s and chains with low gas will be pretty negligible, but any transfers involving ETH, especially when fees are stupid high, paying an extra 10% is retarded. All DDAPs will be hoarding LINK because of this.

2018 marine checking in. don't come here any longer b/c this place is jeet'd beyond belief, but congrats to the CL team & other actual marines (not you insufferable CT twats).
i made it once and i'm gonna make it again. fun times. cheers, boys!

>>55575881
they get subsidized by fat serg, no doubt

>>55575903
>All DDAPs will be hoarding LINK because of this.
Precisely. This was discussed here by /biz/ gigabrains and I am glad we had the opportunity to sit around and listen to them. God it's all coming together exactly as envisioned.

How will you anons spend your newly found (and deserved) outrageous amount of wealth?

>>55575918
The only "subsidization" that is happening is the feeds, and even then users are paying Sergey a nominal amount.
VRF, automation, functions, CCIP are all paid directly and fully by users.

>>55575614
>patheticness
This is the state of fudders, holy shit…

Is 6k stinks enough to make it bros?
Also why are the nolinkers so angry?

>>55575726
Chainlink is about to become the most liquid crypto currency

>>55575842

lets say there's 100 partners with the same amount of messages/transactions, that's 46000 link* 100*6.66(current price)*365 days.is 11,182 billion per yearn which is 3.7 times current mcap.

>>55576034

sorry 3.2 times current mcap

>>55575891
my bet is they add arbitrum before the day's over. they just had eth and optimism earlier before avalanche came online.

>>55576049

so that's 6.66*3.2= 21.31 raise in price in one year for chainlink doing it's work alone, not even counting in people and institutions buying (and selling offcourse)

>>55576076

so if people know you can do an easy 3x in one year imagine the amount buying

So I guess WWIII will be kicking off any moment now right?

>>55575944
it's a word, ESL fag

>>55576084
a cumulative effect, any price is possible at that time

>>55576034
>100 partners with the same amount of messages/transactions
>100 partners with the tx volume of swift
Is such a scenario real though?

>>55576034
>>55576049
>>55576076
>>55576084
>>55576098

>>55576110
No, 46 million cross chain messages a day is pretty unrealistic for defi for the foreseeable future. Even high volume blockchains like polygon only process a couple million tx/day. CCIP will have a chicken and egg effect where it will create its own demand by having new usecases, but even getting to 46 million cross chain transactions a day will be a lot. 46 million * 100 isn't happening for a long time.

>>55575472
Shit that’s expensive

>>55575128
Best part is that they're emotionally attached to the fud. They're as overinvested in fudding as we are in bagholding. People seem to think that with better price action the fud will naturally go away, but it won't because although VCs control the fud narrative the fudders themselves are zealots for the cause, just like linkies. They'll remain here with us, fudding the entire way up.

>>55574807
would have been happier had they waited 1 month to release CCIP until after CELSIUS had dumped their 2 million LINK tokens ..

>>55576201
you're right and it is honestly a wonderful thing to see

>>55576201
>People seem to think that with better price action the fud will naturally go away
We know it won't, because the fud was exactly the same back when Link outperformed the entire market for years on end.

Stock Market shat itself randomly this morning now we know why

Congrats on this

>>55576227
thank you based advocate

>>55576288
You live in a universe where all conversation revolves around Chainlink, and everyone is either for or against it.

>>55575056
Notice how her eyes are closed. What is really going on in this picture?

>>55575472
Why does it cost 4 Link for a transaction?

easy 2x within the week

>>55576357
It appears the gas for the transaction that would normally be paid for in the chain's native token was also paid for in link

>>55576357
It includes the gas costs of the CCIP transaction on the destination chain, L1 Ethereum.

>>55575537
>I'm super angry
lol

>>55576373
Jesus fucks my ass this is it boys
This is the big one
This is literally it
Its happening tonight

>ccip releases while the price is $6.66
i don't like this bros

>>55576371
>>55576373
Why is the gas cost paid in Link?
Is that Link then automatically converted into the respective chain's native token or how does this work?

>>55576336
It’s a shame that by not restraining the urge to respond you prove that poster correct.
What a silly person you must be.

linktards are looking for the next goal post as we speak

>>55576090
No it isn’t, ranjeet

>>55574944
>people "need" link
fixed it for you

>>55576410
You're proving me correct.

Will CCIP serve as a token swap on a single chain as well?

>-3%
LOL

Sergey is dumping

>>55575346
>2023
>Still seething about Gravelcoin
Lmao. It was one of 20 startups. One of the other startups was QNT. You win some you lose some, right?

>>55576468
sell the news

>>55576403
it's all in the github open source code, m8

>>55575002
So it's cheaper than using ETH as gas. Score.

>>55574807
Token not needed

um….. fudbros, I thought you didn’t have to use LINK? It’s a 10% premium that’s converted to LINK anyway???

>>55576638
Why do they need to convert native gas to LINK?

>>55576664
because they made it that way

>>55576664
To pay the nodes running the bridge and later the stakers securing the value of the bridge.

>>55576638
it's all coming from the treasury
token dilution, etc.

>>55575903
Ddaps?

https://youtu.be/YsYTgp5382s

>>55576204
I could be wrong but I think a judge told them they can’t dump

>>55576403
>Why is the gas cost paid in Link?
Because token needed.

>>55576090
Please fucking die

>>55576731
Typo, meant DAPPs.

>>55576734
>>55576734
neat

Four years ago I remember the mainnet announcement, still holding and now staking.
Gentlemen, a toast. Fuck fudders and fuck jannies.

>>55576869
I proprose a toast
to eternal poverty
which is what u STANK MARINES are destined for
kektop

>>55576736
2 weeks ago Celsius literally got the court approval to dump LINK tokens:
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/06/30/bankrupt-celsius-can-convert-altcoins-to-btc-eth-starting-july-1-following-sec-talks/

aaaaand just 2h ago they started dumping LINK:
https://platform.arkhamintelligence.com/explorer/entity/celsius-network

>>55576735
Throw something stinky at him

>>55576906
kektop

>>55576201
you're emotionally attatched to sucking sergeys dick and thinking he can and never has done any wrong.

You are GME tier person who happened to get attached to something that wasnt a piece of shit

>>55576906
And for completeness, 1h ago the LINK-tokens that Celsius stole from its customers and transfered 2h ago >>55576906
to FalconX now landed at Binance 1h ago.

https://platform.arkhamintelligence.com/explorer/entity/falconx

looks like the token was needed after all

>>55574807
this is based.

It begins

>>55576906
Karma for how 4chan/biz treated that poor college girl.

>>55575622
Imagine worshipping sirgay so much that a single post insulting him lives rent free in your head 6 years later

>>55575684
>it...it won't dump more than another 80%
Kek baggies

uhhh fudbros?
i thought the amount was supposed to be 0.00005??

>>55576932
False. Sirgay fucked up during the last bullrun by putting partnerships with literal whos above getting CCIP and staking out the door ASAP. The difference between us is that I bought in 2017 for pennies and you bought the top, which is why I'm not as mad about Sirgay's blunders. Also, I am a White male and identify as such.

>>55576638
It costs the gas price plus the 10% tip to link holders, we are going to be so fucking rich. Monetized HTTP protocol

>link gets used
>price goes high
>link gets too expensive
>nobody uses it
>price dumps back to $6

nice business model kek

He needs to fix his posture.

>>55575479
mainnet transaction: https://ccip.chain.link/msg/0x1ce1c62a2091ba0fb6069bb4095fe14cb70f867175c0e6503b5ebc2e9212e9c8
>"Destination Gas and CCIP Fee" = 4.085518475446634 LINK ($27.37)

transaction cost on optimism: 0.000115337288744451 ETH ($0.22)
(https://optimistic.etherscan.io/tx/0x1791b41f89ef723afd52562d196548971aa325217a969f4eacbd8797d69ccc97))

transaction cost on ethereum: 0.0037362682674441 ETH
($7.12)
(https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1dc27343678b2c3331c4189a43bc8b6e7f158960f05b5306c130019094195d8d))

tl;dr the majority of the cost is the CCIP fee, not the gas

>>55575212
>HA
obviously they can't create more link, but they can just release another token. they could also go public, i.e. do an IPO

>>55574807
if you retards dont pump now then really bury this coin and send it to 0

>>55577170
lol it's doomping to zero, sweetie
enjoy the poorhouse

>>55577154
Pajeet's Perfect Pooping Posture Projects Punjabi Pretenses

>>55576638
You have to pay Sergey in Big Macs and Sergey will convert those to gas. Sergey's sweet fart fumes will fuel CCIP.

theyre crashing the market to suppress the ccip pump. classic

>>55577170
You did see that Celsius is just about to market dump 2m LINK tokens right? See >>55576948

>>55576664
nodes can only be paid in LINK
converting the fee paid from, say ETH, to LINK will have some costs
the 10% penalty covers up these costs

>>55577235
yes, and as much as i hate to say it, it's partially priced in. Telegraphed too much in advance.
All that matters is if this ccip thing is really important or not, historically speaking everything that link does has been trash. But dunno a lot of retards seem to think that this is the one where token gets actual value

>>55577170
please go away and don't come back until you can speak english without sounds like a complete turd

>>55576144
Surely this is the point of CBDC's which are currently being heavily pushed by everyone in politics and finance?

>>55576403
>Why is the gas cost paid in Link?

didn't read, not buying. Sergey is a known scammer, check out his previous projects

>>55577391
this
i heard NXT was a disaster :}

>>55574807
Woah you guys must be pumping hard
>+0.2%
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Im thinking we made it

>>55576948
im bullish on this. Fuck machinsky and stani, at least machinksy wont have a seet at the table

Just popping in here to laff @ kekfuddies. Soz 4 txt speak we're cracking open champagne!
Legendary, wonderful unexpectedly sudden news. I love you all! Xxxxxx

Sitting here with a shit-eating grin on my face in absolute awe at the cope on display from fuddies tonight. Truly a magical day.

>>55577459
I agree this thread really cut through a lot of the nonsense. Some really silly shit getting posted in here and I am far from a CL fanboy. On that note, wake me up when LINK breaks a price level.

>>55577397

>>55577144
18 decimal places babe

What does this mean?

>>55577459
it's not going to pump lmao

>>55577571
do you think they will turn the network off after the scam appearances?

>>55574807
it's insanely depressing that a shitcoin like SHIB is still above LINK in marketcap

>>55577371
I'm just trying to understand it. You have to pay the Link nodes as well as the nodes of the native network, right?

>>55577563
we won

Here comes good ole Bitcoin dump

>>55577169
>obviously they can't create more link
but they technically can.

>+1%
Kek baggies coping hard right now. Nice "pump"

>"They released CCIP?"
>"I'm afraid so, sir."
>"...Dump it below 30K."

>>55574944
Or you could use any of those tokens and they’ll become LINK anyways.

Amazing tokenomics

>>55577599
You just pay in Link and the link nodes take care of the rest

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WE'RE BREAKING 7 AGAIN

So… where is everyone planning to retire to?

*WHAM WHAM WHAM*
AY YOOOOOO BOBO OPEN UP NIGGA

>>55577619
>>55577640
We've never met but we've all witnessed time and time again an event so strange and so important in this budding crypto economy, that we are soul brothers and sisters

>>55577170
first update, added a bit more

>>55577685
cope
just a couple of scam wicks
time for dump

>>55574807
>>55577663
Entire market red except LINK
It's happening again kek

>>55577703
>cope
>just a couple of scam wicks
>time for dump

>>55577170
LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>55577668
I can't dream anymore, too much damage done

1K EOY IS HAPPENING
TONIGHT

>>55577685
lmao

>>55577703

>>55577655
So the people running the Ethereum nodes (for CCIP transactions involving the Ethereum network), will they automatically get paid in ETH?

>>55577701
7.50 target?

>>55577779
Duh, the user has to pay ETH gas like normal.

>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING
>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING
>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING
>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING
>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING
>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING
>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING
>ALLAHU AKBAR
>7.30 INCOMING
ALLAHU AKBAR
7.30 INCOMING

>>55577803
>I have to pay for both LINK and ETH fees
Ew, hard pass. Does XRP do it better?

>>55577801
there is no target, happy to hold as long as it has momentum

>>55577861
Xrp doesn’t do a fucking thing

>>55577874
it's time Mike, dont sell the quick pump and join me in valhalla

>>55577861
You are welcome to only pay in ETH, you just have to pay a 10% premium for doing so :^)

finally link pumping against eth and btc even when dumping. we rly are gmi linksisters

>>55577924
Paying in Link should be fine, as long as Chainlink Labs keeps the price of LINK around the price of a cup of coffee, like they promised.

Be honest with me frens, should I market buy another 200 linkerinos? 1300 stacklet

>Jan 1, 2022: CCIP coming soon this year
>July 17, 2023: here's a test version no one can use

Congrats on this, seriously

>>55578051

why are you waiting

>>55578051
of course

>>55578051
buy

REMINDER : THE PRICE RISING IS CONSIDERED A RISK BY CHAINLINK HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
CUP O' COFFEEEEEEEE
Hahahahahahahaha

>>55578051
You'll soon be able to buy 2000 for the same price

>>55578101
Checked

>>55578093
I’m a risk averse little basedboy latefag

>If link increases in price the chainlink ecosystem fails
Anyone want to explain this?

>>55577924
nail salon

>>55577972
cup of coffee

>>55578051
700k dumps

>>55578051
BTC is about to gigabart, buy in at $5

>>55578118
Baggies explain

>>55574807
brothers and troonsters, it is time

>>55578148
>Sell 100,000 tickets to a 60,000 seat stadium
>"There is a chance this might impact the guest experience at the stadium"
>LOL THIS IS PROOF THE STADIUM IS DOOMED KEK BAGGIES

>>55578200
>Using analogies
Lmao rekt

>>55578200
Is this the best answer you could come up with?

>>55574822
perfect response

>>55577861
You can pay gas fees in Link too.
All people need is Link tokens. No need for source chain or destination chain gas.

>>55578218
It literally explains that "token price high = bad" is a coinciding phenomenon when computational resources are strained, meaning there is massive demand for Chainlink services. This "bearish scenario" still involves massive organic adoption and price appreciation.

>>55578200
this doesn't make any sense

>>55578269
Yep. Even in a scenario where the price were to be kept artificially 'low' (it's all relative), the network usage would be so incredibly high that the APR would be insane.
Stake chads win again.

>>55578270
I think that confirms you are the retard, not the guy who spelt it out for you in a child-friendly way.

>>55578148
>Chainlink may be adopted so massively and abruptly that function may be temporarily reduced

oh no, whatever shall we do???

>>55577160
big oof. and that's link @ 6.84

>>55577160
Messages are flat fee. Token transfers are a percentage payment.

>>55575983
How does $60,000,000 by 2030 sound?

just bought 100 more