/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55449454
Safe from what?

>>55449454
21 is the amount needed to enter the citadel

>>55449454
Protection from being successful?

>>55449454
I always buy BTC, BCH and BSV in a 1:1:1 ratio as a hedge in case we end up in one of the darkest timelines where BCH or BSV flip BTC. It's only an additional 1% per BTC and it gives me piece of mind.

You can buy 235,000 RXD with that money but hey you are free to be retarded

>>55450554
what network is rxd on? dextools link?

>>55450554
It's a L1
It is it's own network

radiantblockchain.org

this thread again? the best move is to watch craig get increasingly desperate and embarrass himself in front of a judge even more. they shouldn't even entertain his cases until he has given any reason to do so, i.e. by providing circumstantial evidence of being satoshi by using the action his system is designed around: signing messages

>>55449499
kek

>>55450554
I’m only an orca and don’t think I will make it to whale status

>>55449457
Blackrock ETF clause says they ''Reserve the right to decide which chain is Bitcoin''.
BSV and BCH could be chosen.

>>55449457
Bitcoin was always meant to be P2P cash. It used to be capable of being so but Segwit stifled it.
Bitcoin cash forked from BTC at Segwit, they also increased the blocksize, which was something Satoshi wanted to implement

I'm not sure as to the reason for BSV forking from BCH but the blocksize was raised again.
It works very well, all things considered.
Only BCH or BSV are capable of being actual Bitcoin in regards to the whitepaper

>>55451500
BCH wanted to change the transaction ordering in blocks from topological to canonical which violates the white paper design. Transactions must be ordered by the time they were entered into the mempool, BCH wanted to destroy this in favour of ordering by alphanumerical for a compression technology that fails if just a few transactions are missing. This approach also put a bunch more load onto the node CPUs making scaling more difficult long term.

>>55451500
Been checking out both of 'em with my research tool, trying to figure out which one's superior, but damn, it's tough to say, kek. I guess I'll have to dive back into tokenmetrics and do some more extensive research. Gotta go for the less volatile option, no doubt.

>>55449454
that is $480 you could have bought real bitcoin with though

>>55451421
Man, we're on the same wavelength here 'cause I'm all about those super low-cap gems too, like UNI, ATOM, VRA, and RIDE. Hoping these babies shine bright when the bulls come charging 'cause, let's be real, going all-in on BTC isn't exactly my style, kek.

Reminder BCH at one point in time almost flipped btc and was trading at 0.5 btc per BCH.
BSV is the best risk to reward play in crypto
Bch is in the middle of the spectrum the two extremes of big vs small blocks are btc and BSV.

Faggot craig should of never larped as Satoshi though. Hes the reason everyone got alienated from it

>>55450335
Anon please... BCH and BSV are shitcoins and will not flip BTC.

Imagine still being in any other crypto besides bsv

>>55451464
No, it can't be bch or bsv. They specifically said that if a new fork occurs they will decide which fork is bitcoin. They mean BTC only. They don't support ordinals. It's okay that you believe your lies but don't drag other people into your cope.