/biz/ - Business & Finance

dating sites are degenerate

>>55370366
>How would I diferenciate from established competitors
Why are you asking us? That's, like, the entire business model and you're asking retard token enthusiasts.

>>55370366
>How would I diferenciate from established competitor

You don't.

>>55370366
>How would I diferenciate from established competitors and without wasting money on marketing?
If anyone here knew the answer to this, they would make their own app, instead of telling your dumb ass

>>55370366 (OP)
>How would I diferenciate from established competitor
Use AI, but, there already is one using ai that's about to release so you're late.
It's funny too I think you can talk to a clone version of them and see if you hit if off before talking to the real version, great for scaling but I think AIs are more fun to talk to than real women so I don't think that way will work out lmao

>>55370366
>its crowded as fuck
Lol

You know that every single big dating website, EVERY SINGLE ONE, is owned by the same parent company? Its fuck all crowded, its literally a monopol held by kikes

>>55370366
99% of dating sites are owned by Match.
If you make that you aren't owned by Match your selling point and point out that Match intentionally leave there sites riddled with bots to corral users to the "pay to talk sites" then your site should do well. You NEED to make tackling bots your top priority.

Also you should do the following:
>denounce hookup culture
>promote healthy relationships
>no joke profiles
>only pay for profile boosts, no "pay to chat"
Don't have to do this because it's gay, but it'll guarantee an audience and free outrage advertising:
>"no trannies" but allow lesbians (you will instantly take the actual female audience the "Her" app)

>>55370573
>there already is one using ai that's about to release
wich one?

If you made one that doesn't limit you with features behind a paywall and you generate revenue some other way, yes you would dominate.

>>55370731
https://apps.apple.com/kw/app/teaser-ai-date-new-people/id6447713174

>>55370366
>Differentiate from competitors
You're already thinking like a loser. If you want to do something new do something big.

What's the problem with current experience of dating? Start with that.

Although the competitor's matching algorithms are shit (they admitted its basically luck) optimizing that its playing their game, and theyll crush you with all their knowledge (large user base, financing, bots, etc)

If you wanna have a chance do something different. The problem with current apps its that their incentive is not to give you a fulfilling relationship, because they would lose you as a costumer.
Here's the creative part. How could you create an app with aligned incentives? Should you educate people? Charge a subscription to long lasting couples? Charge less to people who last longer to incentive making it work? Work on these

>>55370392
this

>>55370366
No it's not worth it because it would just end up like all the other apps. Massive surplus of male users, barely any man can find a date, the very few female users are ultra trashy, etc.

>>55370366
>How would I diferenciate from established competitors
Unironically make it for virgins only.
Literally none of the other dating apps or websites out there let you filter by virginity. You can filter by age, weight, smoking habits, drug use, etc. but they refuse to let you value virginity.