/biz/ - Business & Finance

Eugenics will work.

>>55344044
They cravin' BBC

Damn I remember that pic getting posted all the time on /fit/ like 10 years ago

>>55344067
>shows the girls with white guys
>retard nog dick luster comes in with his fantasy of being the girl and black guys fucking him
>every fucking thread with you queers

That play would be more about preserving the money, not profit.

>>55344044
Let me get this straight -- Fidelity and Blackrock have announced plans to launch a BTC ETF and you're asking about bonds?

Serious question, and I don't mean any offense by this, but are you fucking retarded?

>>55344597
The crypto market as a whole isn't even an HPV papilloma on the bond market's nutsack you retarded zoomer.

>>55344597
I'm looking for something lower-risk to diversify

It's supposed to be an alternative to sitting on a pile of cash

>>55344664
How is this relevant? I think you misunderstand my point. BTC is not only the best preservation of purchasing power ever invented, but institutions such as Blackrock and Fidelity opening ETFs presents a once in a lifetime opportunity, with *relatively* low risk.

>>55344828
Lol, in my world, BTC is lower risk. Maybe check out the gold chart before and after the gold ETF was introduced. But it's up to you, I understand wanting less risk. Good luck keeping up with inflation and monetary expansion though.

>>55344597

Buy the rumor, sell the news.

Idiot.

Crypto is done for anyway.

>>55344893
>gold chart before and after the gold ETF was introduced
Interesting
Can you post for educational purposes please?

>>55344893
I showed you my dick.pls reply

>>55344917
Lmao, refer to the chart I referenced.
>Crypto is done for
First of all, Bitcoin is different than "crypto," and second of all, you realize this gets said every single bear market, right? How on your brain can you read news of institutional adoption and utter those words.

>>55344919
>>55345003
pic related

>>55344893
Gary Gensler

>>55345296
BTC is a commodity, not a security. The SEC and CFTC have already acknowledged this. Notice how BTC is not mentioned in any of the lawsuits.

>>55344917
Blackrock and Fidelity opening a Bitcoin ETF means institutional investors will finally have a way to safely buy and custody BTC. You don't think they want the same kinds of returns Michael Saylor and Microstrategy have had for the last 3 years? I'll go a step futher -- a spot ETF and more institutional investors means less volatility over time for BTC as the market cap grows. This is one of the key steps to BTC becoming a central bank reserve asset, the same way they hold gold. So I'm telling you now, it is only a matter of time before a central bank decides to put BTC on its balance sheet. If you want to miss that boat, by all means, help yourself.

>>55345295
Thanks bro!

>>55345295
Yo! Come back dude. What's your take on this verbiage?
>>55345536

>>55344893
Kek bitcoinbaggy

>>55344597
>BTC

>>55346317
>>55346338
It's genuinely humorous watching people react like this. It's like, there's a cliff 50 feet in front of you, and some BTC chad comes along and says "hey, there's a cliff 50 feet in front of you," and you guys go "haha btc dumb" and keep walking forward.

>>55346422
>It's genuinely humorous watching people react like this. It's like, there's a cliff 50 feet in front of you, and some BTC chad comes along and says "hey, there's a cliff 50 feet in front of you," and you guys go "haha btc dumb" and keep walking forward.

Bitcoin peaked with the Nasdaq in late 2021. We're in a bear market for speculative assets. Bitcoin's 2023 rally predictably mimics the Nasdaq's rally. BTC is moreorless leveraged Tech / speculative junk.

If the Nasdaq sinks 33% from here, Bitcoin will go along for the ride, it's just how it is.

>>55344044

why remove the picture