/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55307934

https://twitter.com/CoingraphNews/status/1669269590059151361

so...is this the part where Ripple gives SWIFT the 50 billion xrp in escrow to save the financial system? idk we'll just have to see.

>>55307950
>so...is this the part where Ripple gives SWIFT the 50 billion xrp in escrow to save the financial system?

I'm going to go with no on that one

>>55307934
>guy fawkes mask in the current year+8
absolutely cringe

Why not just do it instead of Tweeting about it?

>>55307971
>Why not just do it instead of Tweeting about it?

So the narrative can be established for the public. There is literally no other reason. Giving a warning to prepare is the last thing you'd want to do for something like this. Its just glowniggers running ops to affect public perception. Then the "hack" will happen later like they said it would.

The only other reason would be to try to strong arm ransom through threats but that generally works best if you actually take something first kek

Bump

Oh no! I guess CCIP will just have to come fix everything! Very cool

2 more days

this nigga is out of control, did sergey give him too much leeway?

Qmom on twitter has been saying things related to this too xD

>>55308129
Look at this face and tell me he can be controlled

Any second now, hold on tight!!!!!!

what is the opsec advantage of broadcasting your intent to commit crimes?

>>55307934
Embarrassing.

>>55307934
What does swift have to do with western financial system? Isn’t it international deposit only

>>55307934
great idea announcing it ahead of time, now they'll never expect it

>>55307934
oh no not
>anonymous sudan

>>55307934
>zyberpandemic
Here.we.go.

bullish for BTC & XMR

>>55308158
>>55308176
it's not an opsec advantage, it's a force multiplier. iirc Killnet & Revil are Russian groups

>>55308139
the numbers are in control of him and he is in control of the numbers

>>55307934
Just hack the onboard cpu code like the nsa. Oh wait, they probably are the nsa.

>>55307965
Cringing is almost fear smiling. Working as intended.

>>55307934
Anal sex

>>55307993
This it's obvious there trying to push the narrative for cbdc

>>55307934
>be me, highly overpaid network security IT consultant for any of these institutions
>see a bunch of pings from a childish script kiddie DDoS attack
>notice they all have the same signature because they are coming from a common hax0r program that loads default in a particular linux network security distro
>literally just turn on cloudflare "DDoS protection" setting on webserver
>watch as the angry sois realize the website is fine and now try attacking another one of my clients
>literally login and do the same thing again
>they go home butthurt and post about their great victory on twatter for knocking our website down for the entire 2 minutes it took for me to get the notification and phonecall that something was going on
>smile as i stick my dick into the 9/10 zoomer pussy i have over for the night, knowing those virgins will never know the feeling
>spend the entire next day fielding questions from top brass at the company wanting to know what upgrades and staff they need to hire to prevent this from happening again
>so afraid of me branchswinging to a higher paying jew, they give me a $23,000 bonus for my "quick thinking" in saving the day
>mfw

Kek custodians are gonna kill themselves. Imagine having to process a thousand faxes each a day

Bet the boomer who is in charge of the login has the password set as "password"

>>55307950

>>55308402
>Russian groups
>sends stolen money to Ukraine
Tel Aviv hours

>>55308100
>CCIP will just have to come fix everything
CCIP is far more vulnerable than SWIFT

>>55308746

Wasn't that John Podesta's gmail login? Lmao I think it was seriously Pa$$word or something

>>55309466
>CCIP is far more vulnerable than SWIFT

Maybe but we can't know for sure either way. Generally blockchain encryption would be more secure from attacks but its also novel technology so its hard to say.

>>55308679

It definitely appears to be otherwise you would never announce you are going to hack a system prior to doing it. If the threat were real that would allow SWIFT or whoever to be on full alert and have contingencies ready to go. Its sub 85 IQ retard tier and yet they expect the public to believe it. Kek

>>55307934
Aren't they traitors working for the CIA now?
Why is the CIA attacking Swift?

>>55309794
>Why is the CIA attacking Swift?

The most likely explanation are these replies below

>>55307993
>>55308679


>>55308173

11,000 banks world wide use SWIFT's messaging system so I'd assume the hackers could either just disable it to freeze the ability to send funds or perhaps they could alter where some funds being processed are sent effectively stealing them.

>>55309794
who fucking knows. in the end the only people who suffer from it are normies and wagies anyway

>>55307934
Is this how they roll out the CBDC’s?

Nothingburger

>>55310004

I mean blockchain encryption based fiat would likely be more secure than what they are doing now

Governments often create a problems so they can introduce their predetermined solution and gain public support simultaneously

>>55309794
Yeah this a CIA Operation. It's to jump start the motivation to advance on Russia and also control the human population when they swap over to the new system. Mike Pompeo is already being a slimey asshole already.

what happened with this?

>>55311681
Nothing. There is supposed to be a data dump if the ransom isn't paid.

>>55307934
‘Anonymous’ is the gayest shit meme that originated from this website

>>55311809
Wait did some kind of hack actually happen? Kek

>>55312034
I wouldn't consider Russia an ally of Israel anymore yid. Iran is now best friend

>>55310087
>More secure.
No, 10.000+ western world banks working together is the decentralized aspect of fiat needed for it to function. You have bookkeeping, you have human lives checking scores, you have a messaging system, you have A LOT of keys spread out over jurisdictions.
"Blockchain fiat" in theory would simply make validation automated, something which in the least is errorful with swift, currently. It's avoiding double spending, avoiding values dissapearing or growing from 'legal' sources without permission. It really is the backbone of legacy banking, even though accounting itself basically is giving someone else your money. So 'security' isn't really better, nor needed, as admins still can swipe, confiscate or transfer your hard earned money for no good reason but plenty of corrupt ones, if you're politically against those holding the keys - are 'legally' prosecuted.
This function is the bread and butter and selling point why of you should be giving oversight and power over of your finances to institutional oversight and 'legal' recourse, and as a result, blockchain tech is way too complicated to write into protocol for this system - designed for backdooring.. Blockchain tech is about purely decentralized bookkeeping, cbdcs can not itself have blockchain tech and it never will have, as you, loosing your finances, always will happen if the powers see you using the funds against the system itself, and is corrupt by design of control and inaccountability of those holding the keys to the system itself.

I am sure we agree Cbdcs will just be rebranded, shitty control over you, whatever the selling point. And it WILL be used against all of us, somewhere down the line, as it basically never can be our money.

>>55312439
Single sided bookkeeping. That's the crux with pure blockchain. It's really great as a cash equivalent in an environment where one simply can't trust banks and government or where no banks are present, but for modern banking it's worthless, unless one adds a bunch of bullshit like smartcontracts on top of it and does the opposite of what it is supposed to be, simple and elegant, instead of bloated and unreliable