/biz/ - Business & Finance

so we're gonna get a bunch of free GMX? fuckin based. that shit is $44 dog

>>55306304
Stakers will never see a cent

>>55306304
Is it 1.2% of the revenue, or 1.2% of the token supply? Because those are different things. Token may be like UNI and not have any yield at all (albeit it may increase in price ofc)

I say this as a two 7k wallets staker. Please clarify so that I can add this to my hopium list.

>>55306338
this post reeks of banista

>>55306457
1.2% of the GMX fees

GMX is not in BUILD and the percentage was promised to Chainlink service providers, not stakers. Exciting numbers though.

>>55306486
i am a service provider, i am alerting ytour faggot ass to sergey right now

>>55306466
>>55306477
>>55306500
Checking these digits
Op how did Glp chads make out

>>55306304
WAOW! 1/100th of a cent per link?!?!?
Thats like 70 cents a day!! Vishnu bless i will be richest man in all of delhi slum. No longer I am have to search for scrap metal in the dumps! I will be retire man thanks chainlink sirs

>>55306500
this
my alerting services do not come for free, asswipe

>>55306486
How about you suck my big fat dick?

And yes, im Loots, chainlink janny.

and those fees will go directly to the chainlink team to pay for more hr roasties. you cant expect them to work for free yaknow

That's great news. How will this increase the value of the token?

>>55307059
now multiply that across 12,000;000 different dapps paying chainlink every second

>>55307431

>>55307856
Ok $13 X 12,000,000
WAOW!!!! every 7000 staker will be getting $156,000,000 dollars PER DAY!!! thats a lot of money!!!
I like money!

>>55308126
>every 7000 staker will be getting $156,000,000 dollars PER DAY!!!
Fuck yeah, I'm pumped

>>55306304
Well your math only works with the 22,5 million staked link. This will increase ALOT over time (is what we hope). Of course there will be different new Build projects and other revenue streams that are getting turned on. I just think that the 12% APY from GMX might be very short lived

>>55308126
holy shit i'm going to be so fucking rich

gmx sounds like ftx 2.0
where do these vcs get their capital from?
i know do not question le source we are just middlemen with heavy bags of link we purchased for ¢.30 (pronounced cents DOT thirty)
vcs are kind of like de facto crypto government desu
why did they dig your trip up again popo you went dark for years unironically

>>55308171
that's only accounting for gmx, sure u're right about the pool increasing, but you seem to forget we are only getting yield for the ETH/USD feed ONLY.
imagine we get yields from all feeds + ccip + functions + automations + deco + other projects that will givout % of their fees.

we fucking made it, and by the time people will wake up to it it'll be too late

ccip will defer usage to the cheapest blockchain and essentially scale all cryptos by abstracting the layer one away.
there is evidence to believe this but the mETH kabal have repeatedly chanted eth is not for poorfags. how do you see it playing out popo if kabal usage still centers on eth despite the potential cost savings of ccip
i do not think there is any organic usage in crypto so i think ccip will initially be a hard sell
then again arbitum went against them and protocols are deploying on arbitrum
but then again arbitrum forgot to top up their wallet the other day causing the entire scaling mechanism to cone to a crashing halt kek

>>55308126
well, if chainlink gets that many people on the build program, the math checks out...
we told you to get onboard the citadel, mate

>>55308364
>ccip will defer usage to the cheapest blockchain and essentially scale all cryptos by abstracting the layer one away.

how? lets say $pepe only had 1 liquidity pool on eth, are you saying it will be possible to buy using another chain and not pay eth gas fees?

>>55308651
no ETH is the only viable way and the future. Chainlink retards don't know anything about blockchain. ETH will be the only relevant blockchain to exist.

>>55308188
>A defi app that earns real revenue from people paying funding fees for on-chain leverage sounds like a fraudulent cex that uses customer deposits to buy meth

If any other linkies think like this, please unalive

>>55308651
>may mays are teh future
oh my sweet summer child
>>55308685
abstracting away costs and complexity is the future and the only way blockchains see long term growth
>>55308790
seething are you potter?

>a portion of the fees from this proposal are planned to be sent directly to stakers as user fee rewards for increasing the cryptoeconomic security of Chainlink services used by GMX

>>55308350
we are blessed

>>55306304
some of the fud replies in this thread are so abysmally low iq i am not even gonna bother with commenting anymore
gmx is real user paid revenue in this the depths of the bear not a vc/cex scam you unbelievable collosal retards

>>55309606
gmx=ftx 2.0 lmao seeth shill

>>55309606
its like trying to communicate with bugs