/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55276583
Imagine being such a pathetic loser that your time is used to belittle bags that you yourself cant own because your a poorfag

>>55276583
you know, you don't have to pretend to be a fudder to share chainlink news. we're all friends here.

>>55276583
>>55276591
>>55276598
Price of a cup of coffee

>>55276611
wow wtf good point i just sold everything

>>55276620
You should have sold when link went from .23c to $50

>>55276583
There are only 656,734 total wallets holding Chainlink and a bunch of those are not individuals. Ethereum was worth about $12 when it had this number of wallets. We actually have fewer holders today than we had a year ago when I made picrel.

>>55276658
>STAKING
>BUILD
>GUARANTEED AIRDROPS
>FUNCTIONS
>SWIFT
>VOLATILITY ORACLES
>CCIP
>NOT A SECURITY

Holy fuck and it’s still all not price in. How do I even continue to even give a single fuck at work when it’s so obvious that link is the one. YES, I’m confident that was the alt coin bottom.

>>55276583
>checks price
kek
lmao

>>55276713
Oh it's happening alright. It's going to happen. You'll see.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3kRd9HtV1s

two more weeks of testing then the alpha test trials can begin!

>>55276655
wow wtf good point i just sold everything

>>55276746
"It's happening!"
Token not needed

>>55277606
>price action determines if token is needed
wow, XRP must be really needed then

>>55277625
Price action reflects the fact that token is not needed

>>55277731
really

should've bought BEET CORN

>>55277625
>>55277759

>>55276583
link is a cuck token

>>55277774
Maybe you should go back to twitter and stay there.

TOKEN NOT NEEDED

>>55277789
>thread about Chainlink reaching 1m followers on twitter
>"go back to twitter111!"
are you ok Zach?

>>55277805
You and OP, yes.

>>55277810
OK;LG

imagine thinking you're still early when your ico has one million followers on fucking twitter

nobody is buying these dusty bags.

>>55277774
Cripplet triggered hard

>>55277853

>>55277877
And since Ripple got sued by the SEC, suddenly XRP became more needed than Link.
Somehow.

>>55277888
holy check

>>55277826
Link is rank 20-something while it has the most crypto adoption and highest institutional interest since ETH.
It belongs in rank 5 at least right now, which is a 10x.
And that's before actual deployment by Swift for instance.
That's objectively early.

>>55276713
the singularity was not a joke, it will price in all at the same time.

>>55277888
yeah bro, XRP is clearly needed judging by the absolute crabfest on the chart for 6 years LMAO

>>55277924
>crabfest
It's rank 6, and outperformed Link these past three years when all it did was get sued by the SEC while Link usage exploded.

According to your logic, getting sued by the SEC is a much better use case for a token than massive adoption.

>>55277922
Checked

>>55277935
it's the same price it was 6 years ago, it hasn't outperformed shit
LINK and XRP used to be at the same price 4 years ago as well, around $0.25

>>55277948
>it hasn't outperformed shit

>>55277953
are you illiterate?
it is the same price it was 6 years ago

>>55277959
How does that change what happened in the past ~3 years?

>>55277965
???
how is that relevant to the fact that XRP has been dead for over 6 years now?
>b-but bro it outperformed cause it got dragged up 2x!
with the same logic, nearly EVERYTHING outperformed LINK since its 2020 top, why are we focusing on the worst possible example here lmao

>>55277975
>XRP has been dead for over 6 years now
It's literally rank 6 right now.
And XRP massively outperformed Link in the past ~3 years.

>>55277983
>2x
>"massively"
it is literally the same price it was in mid 2017, touch grass
>It's literally rank 6 right now.
and it used to be rank 3

>>55277995
>2x
>"massively"
Ripple did a 2x while Link lost 40%.

>>It's literally rank 6 right now.
>and it used to be rank 3
Meaning it lost 3 ranks.
Link lost 16.

According to your logic, XRP has been very needed ever since it got sued by the SEC.

>>55276591
>Imagine being such a pathetic loser that your time is used to belittle bags that you yourself cant own because your a poorfag

>>55278002
bro, it has been LITERALLY stuck at the same range for 6 fucking years, the entire market went up at least 2x.
The reality is that XRP got dragged up with the rest of the market, it actually dropped in ranks, while LINK simply fell off a cliff.

I think I’m not the only one on here that realizes that the Chainlink discussions here aren’t organic at all.

A complex mix of paid shills and bots post memes and start conversations. Real anons browsing /biz/ think these convos are real and start making convos themselves. Then when things die down, the bots and paid shills start again to capture new bagholders.

>>55276591
Nobody using eth is so poor they cant afford link. 1 LINK ~ 1 tx fee. You're retarded.

>>55278016
>6 fucking years
If you're going to use the 6-year timeframe alone, then you have to agree that the Link token is very needed based on price action.

>>55278028
>shifts the goalposts to the stratosphere
I think you have to agree with me that both of them are dead altcoins
btw, here's your outperformance bro

>>55278036
>>shifts the goalposts
Literally what?
I used the timeframe YOU keep bringing up.

During the past 6 years, Link outperformed a lot of the market, including BTC and ETH.

>>55278043
>During the past 6 years, Link outperformed a lot of the market
>b-b-but also muh XRP outperformed us!11!
the duality of the deranged paid twitter advocate in full display

>>55278049
>>b-b-but also muh XRP outperformed us!11!
XRP only outperformed Link during the past 3 years.

Meaning it has been more needed than Link during the past 3 years, according to your logic.

>>55278058
according to my logic a 2x or even a 3x in a span of 3 years is nothing in the crypto market, especially if it follows the general market trend
you are desperately grasping at straws, trying to rationalize the downward spiral LINK has entered for the past three years
pro tip: it has nothing to do with XRP or BTC

>>55277975
>why are we focusing on the worst possible example
XRP is a very good comparison.
The SEC case against Ripple coincides with two major Chainlink milestones:
1) Link’s dramatic price action reversal compared to the market
2) Link’s dramatic uptick in adoption

>>55278074
It's very simple: if Link's bad price action these past three years means the "token is not needed", then that same logic means the XRP token has been very needed these same past three years.

>>55278096
why are you so hung up on XRP when you could make the same case for every altcoin ranked 20th and above you autist

>>55278095
XRP hasn't moved since 2017, you people are delusional

>>55278103
Because >>55278095

>>55278104
The discussion is about the past three years.

>>55278117
zoom the fuck out, 2x in 3 years is nothing, if you consider that "outperformance" then how do you call what DOGE did, "annihilation"?
>>55278114
so you are obsessed with XRP bags you don't hold cause your shitcoin didn't pump higher?
sad and pathetic

>>55278103
Other coins like ADA, Doge, … are very egregious comparisons as well, but XRP tops them all with the sec suit.

>>55278127
>so you are obsessed with XRP bags
If the past three years of Link price action mean the Link token is not needed, then the past three years of XRP price action mean the XRP token is very needed.

Not sure why you are struggling so hard with this very simple concept.

>>55278128
so what you're telling me is that you're extremely butthurt the lawsuit didn't cause a complete price collapse, got you bro

>>55278132
switch XRP with ETH or BTC and we're in full agreement, I repeat, a 2x in 3 years is nothing, it lost ranks while it pumped bro

>>55278134
Not necessarily, but the fact that it did better than Chainlink is pretty damn insane by any metric.

>>55278138
what is even more insane is steering the attention away from what Chainlink is or isn't doing and focusing on what other shitcoins did in order to explain LINK's price action

>>55278137
>a 2x in 3 years is nothing
It's objectively better than losing 50%.

You have some serious mental issues going on right now.

>>55278144
yes, but anyone who bought LINK when they were trading at the same price is laughing at your asinine statements right now, LINK is up at least 10x

>>55278143
Comparing the two very clearly exposes the insanity of the market

>>55278148
You're talking about beyond three years ago.

I'm addressing the argument that "bad price action means token not needed". Link only had bad price action during the past three years.

>>55278152
>speculative market is irrational
NO WAY
now keep harping on about XRP and ADA and blahblahblah, that will certainly instill some rationality to the market!

>>55278158
which is have of its entire lifespan, XRP has been crabbing for 6 years, amazing comparison dude
>b-b-but the lawsuit should have crashed XRP to $0 reeeeeee
the absolute state

>>55278159
>>speculative market is irrational
Exactly. So saying TNN based on how the irrational market treats Chainlink is itself irrational.

>>55278168
>which is have of its entire lifespan
half* for fucks sake
>>55278169
oh I see what's going on here
what if the statement changes to
>nearly every altcoin is not needed!
do you agree with that statement now?

>>55278168
>XRP has been crabbing for 6 years
And Link has been dumping for nearly 3, prompting people to claim that this means the token is not needed.

>>55278218
XRP is 10 years old, LINK is 6 and has been dumping for 3 years, as a matter of fact if the situation doesn't reverse until September, LINK will have officially spent more time being on a downtrend than on an uptrend.
your comparison is moot and retarded and it boils down to
>reeeeeeeee why isn't XRP at $0 alreadt, muuuh hekcking lawsuit reeee

>>55278245
The timeframe is the exact same for Link and XRP: the past three years.
If going down in that timeframe means token not needed, then going up/crabbing in that timeframe must mean token is needed. Otherwise the logic is bunk.

>>55276583
Now you know why there are so many shills on /biz/. Can't believe he has ruined the lives of so many people, and they don't even feel angry about it. That's religion (cult), for you.

>>55278143
>24pbtid

>>55278255
let me put it this way, neither XRP nor LINK are needed, regardless of price action

>>55278358
>regardless of price action
This whole argument is about the fud spam that bases token neededness purely on price action.

>>55276591
You wish chain shit had 1 million holders jeet. Has around 400k and its dumping non stop

>>55278593
>ddurrr hurr derpity derp durrr
yes anon, none of those shitcoins are needed, price literally doesn't matter it's all speculation, and all of your rationalization attempts fall flat
you can stop coping in every thread now

>>55278720
>price literally doesn't matter it's all speculation
All these hours and all these posts, and you end up outright agreeing with me.

>>55278732
we're in fundamental disagreement though, XRP did not outperform shit, and most importantly, LINK does not "deserve" a spot in top 5, it's literally just a shitcoin

If Link can be used to link grocery produce to the blockchain, then everytime you buy a banana, Link's price goes up. It's a no-brainer.

>>55278812
You agree that price action is speculation, and doesn't matter for things like token neededness.

>>55276611
i might be dyslexic but your id spells "price 08 EOM"

>>55278812
>Link is literally just a shitcoin
Judging by your post count, that’s not how you feel about Link at all.

>>55278821
sure, but at the same time, absolutely nothing is needed

>checks price of chainlink
hahaha oh no no no hahaha

>>55278836
keep judging arguments by pbtid then

>>55278837
>29 pbtid just to “argue” that Link is not needed because nothing is needed

You literally have no life, do you.

>>55276583
>1 million future millionaires
ftfy