/biz/ - Business & Finance

LOL stay poor LINK baggies

>>55270172
I sold all my link at $45 and I am buying heavily here. You'd have to be retarded not to. Link baggies will still make it if they don't capitulate.

Karma is real anon, and your material gains will not save you from death karmic retribution. Isn't there enough suffering in the world? And I'm supposed to believe this activity is what you're choosing to do despite having financial freedom?

quiet as expected, although im sure the baggies that told me off have killed themselves at this point. $5 LMAO

>>55270208
i havent worked in a long time and just bothered to come here today because Reddit is down. I have made WAY more money since by just following real estate advice from there.

>>55270172
>>55270212
This nigger hasn't made any money due to being a poor bottom feeder

>>55270239
cool now search the two images i posted

>>55270267
You do it for me, monkey, since you seem so eager to get some point across lmao
Fuddiewuddie poorfag

>>55270308
im not eager at all baggie, stay poor

>>55270172
Whenever I see weird shit like this, I immediately know this is a log chart. For readers, please consult the real chart and don't get deceived.

>>55270159
Kek fuddies

>Early sellers e.g. Francisco
>Top buyers (Twitter/Reddit tourists i.e. the majority of posters)
>Celsius/Bancor/Linkpool """victims"""
These are the mentally ill retards plaguing the board with shitty LINK threads. Instead of learning from this humbling experience and moving on, they spend their time screaming at ATL buyers i.e. Anons here. What a sad existence.

>>55270889
you fell for the grift and will keep denying reality

adam you have been here this morning

Based OP. I sold at $30 and am planning on slurping back at $3

>>55270239
>falseflag spam
>show yourself falseflag spam
>LOOK GUYS, ITS TOTALLY NOT ME COPING

>>55270159
>>55270172
>>55270212
>>55270223
>>55270267
>>55270335
egas

With these threads, you'll notice that they never post any buy or sell orders because it either never happened or its an embarrassingly small amount compared to those who are still up 40-50x

>>55271419
if that moron anon sold on 7/4/2021 instead of bitching and convincing himself his investment was a golden egg and that the jews were out to get him, then he would be way better off. x5 better in fact.

>>55270223
You are posting specifically in a manner to antagonize anons, you yourself bought and held the top and you know pretending to be someone who sold the top and takes boomer real estate advice from soi plebbitors would infuriate you, so you pretend that is what you did, just like /pol/ fags pretend to be trannies on /pol/. I don't get why you people do this, (you)'s aren't that addicting are they?

>>55270159
gonna be honest here this range break really broke my spirit, if it wasnt for the swift namedrop and ccip conformation i would have capitulate right here from buying back in in june last year
time will tell if this was a genius or complete retard move
in any case this is a terrible time to be a fundamental investor in crypto

>>55272068
Sort of have the opposite view on this, but not because of link (its obv shitting the bed with everything else), rather I always felt the entire alt market needed to be cleansed before another run could happen, and that is happening. The fact link is going down the toilet with other alts sucks, but its for the greater good, and also if you do believe in market making conspiracies, them randomly pumping it in a few months after complete market apathy is probably the ideal time to catch the greatest amount off guard. That, or they are pushing for a final capitulation when staking rewards unlock by the end of year.

>>55272068
>range break
The market cap perfectly retested the original lows of the range. Supply was added since summer '22.
Coincidentally, the perfect amount of supply to dump Link to last summer's marketcap, while the usd valuation per token makes a lower low that PERFECTLY retests the previous price "ceiling".
I'm referring to the $4.80 unbreakable wall that Link battled for over a year.
>Coincidentally
This is orchestrated.

Those who were brave enough to buy the dip here will be rewarded handsomely.

>>55272136
Yeah I mean I know people love to suck TA dick, but the problem with TA in crypto is when its wrong, you get BTFO by massive wicks. Either to the upside or downside. TA right now suggests link has to go back to 2-3 dollar range, but what if it doesn't? This is a great way to induce a final capitulation of whoever is left willing to sell (ie any short/medium term traders left).

>>55272174
>TA right now suggests link has to go back to 2-3 dollar range
No it doesn't. Ceilings become floors to form support. There is no evidence suggesting $3, unless you are referring to brown-skinned retards on tradingview grasping at straws.
>This is a great way to induce a final capitulation
Anon, you just watched the final capitulation happen. If I could go back to March 2020 you'd be the one drawing squiggly lines in a downward angle on BTC.

>>55272136
>The market cap perfectly retested the original lows of the range. Supply was added since summer '22.
damn this is true thanks fren
i really meant it when i said it broke my spirit i was too depressed to even open a tradingview chart and be forced to watch the live price update so didnt even check, but yes this is very accurate
in either case i roped myself to this ship now so no getting off anymore just in case someone would misunderstand me as subtle fud

>>55272211
will you still be around if it plummets below $4?
somehow I doubt it

>>55272136
Youre literally just gonna come up with another cope when it reaches $3 lol

Ranging sideways for a year means the bottom is not in yet, that is nowhere near max pain. Sentiment has not indicated that capitulation has happened when every single linkfag on /biz/ and twitter is still bullish and buying more.
The bottom is in only when everyone has given up and stops buying

>>55272340
>>55272390
It'll never hit. The SEC just whipped their big cock out for all to see and we dumped accordingly. Anyone who hasn't been flushed out by now isn't going anywhere. C&S

>>55271850
Not selling

>>55270159

Didn't buy back your link yet? Your loss.

>>55270208
It might have a revival, but I doubt it'll be in the top 50 gainers...

>>55272444
>It'll never hit
famous last words

>>55272587

>>55272444
You guys said the same thing during ftx. Yet here we are lower low

>>55270889
Francisco is a top buyer, not an early seller, alsomost LinkPool ""victims"" are still on the green

>>55272549
This is really retarded. Now the market as a whole may have a muted cycle this time around due to macro concerns, sure. But this is exactly the sort of atmosphere you need for link to outperform, one where all the scams are flushed down the toilet. If the SEC shit continues, there's not going to be another cumpissfart token bull run.

>>55272211
checked but no, there is TA that suggests 2-3 dollars even if you don't agree with it. My point is TA doesn't matter, I don't follow it specifically because its just based on following trends, and crypto as a market bucks trends constantly. If you tried to consistently trade crypto based on TA you'd get buck broken by unexpected pumps and dumps on even btc in a long enough time period.

>>55272131
They'll do that, clear out space in the staking pool