/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55260821
I am hoping for 1$ in 2024. Holding a stack of 1M $KAS right now and planning on buying more if it drops below 1c.

kyspa scam

>>55260921
Please explain the word kyspa

>>55261026
"kaspa" will make you want to kys when you fall for the kyspa scam

my basic target is 15c
not sure about the short term, though
from a tech point of view this one is as advanced as it gets

>>55261134
>from a tech point of view this one is as advanced as it gets
lol

>>55261192
i'd try and engage but honestly don't care
stick to kadena and fuck off

>>55261198
I don't hold either, but I'll fuck off and return to one post per thread.

Ok.

Avax and Kaspa, Op.

>>55261134
>from a tech point of view this one is as advanced as it gets
When did it ever affect the price?

>>55262966
haven't been watching the chart the past year? give me one better performing chart

>>55261134
>from a tech point of view this one is as advanced as it gets
lmao it cant even do smart contracts

>>55263421
nobody cares
imagine being able to do near-instant payments with the same security level as bitcoin, and with better decentralization

>>55263409
Are we talking about the same chart? Then pepe did way better. Don't get me wrong, I hold 20k of KAS, but with ASICs released and until smartcontracts are implemented it will crab.

>>55261134
>from a tech point of view this one is as advanced as it gets
>>55263461
>nobody cares
Oh, you are just full of shit. Nevermind.

>>55263468
i hope it crabs or dumps, i'll buy more
all the claims you make are retarded
ASICs don't matter for price, that's a conspiracy
SCs don't matter for price, the tech is too innovative even without SCs
and that chart is non stop bullish action

>>55260821
how's owing the bank sound?

Actual concern with kapsa here

So much of the supply has already been issued, how will kaspa motivate miners to maintain the network with emissions are going to be so low in a few years?

>>55263523
by doing exactly what bitcoin fails to do, i.e. scaling to the point where tx fees cover everything

>>55260821
it will moon in the bullrun just because that would be its first

>>55263409
This so fucking much t: GRT bagholder

>>55263508
Anon shows his – I mean THEIR – best arguments:
>u retard
>i buy more
>conspiracy
I miss the old days

>>55263537
Okay but that needs to happen on a rather short window no?
It's a big goal

>>55263554
point me to a thread you wrote that isn't useless

>>55263563
yeah, emissions start leveling off in 2025 or so

>>55263508
>ASICs don't matter for price, that's a conspiracy
But they do. If you can mine more KAS per kWh because ASICs are more efficient this leads to:
1) Centralization
2) Miners dumping at lower prices because it is still profitable

>>55263461
>imagine being able to do near-instant payments with the same security level as bitcoin, and with better decentralization
ahaha i dont need to imagine doing near-instant payments, Radiant RXD already does instantaneous 0-conf transactions with all of the above.

>>55263668
it's speculation, really
you could just as well claim that centralization of holdings is a good thing (and honestly the norm is centralization / pareto distribution)
and you could claim that because the ASICs increase profitability there is less of an incentive to sell, and the miners could instead speculate on future price appreciation without risking significant losses

the whole claim from Son of a Tech and such is not so much based on what you say but rather on the idea that Bitmain would premine, manipulate the market to pump the price, and then continuously dump their accumulated rewards to tank the price to oblivion

>>55263792
0-conf isn't the same thing, and radiant has a non-active git. they stole their ideas from others. nexa is a better project but still irrelevant because it doesn't have high bps. high bps is a huge gamechanger

>>55263799
>0-conf isn't the same thing
youre right, it's even faster
>radiant has a non-active git
because its already complete, it has all the stuff kaspa doesnt have yet but will keep dragging you along for years to come with promises of fulfilment

>>55263819
>youre right, it's even faster
no, because it's not anywhere near close the level of security provided by kaspa
it also doesn't come with other advantages of high bps, like facilitating solo mining
>because its already complete
kek

>>55263845
>it's not anywhere near close the level of security provided by kaspa
its actually more secure, super fast bps are a point of insecurity. and yeah it is complete, kaspa can do nothing more than act as a fast payment system. it lacks most features of modern L1s.

>>55263819
>Radiant
>because its already complete

>>55263887
smart contracts, NFT,s induction proofs, Turing complete. fully fleshed out set in stone protocol ready to be built on from day 1.

>>55263897
do you actually know what Turing complete means?

>check circulating supply
>15B
>check one month later
>18B
shalom, but I'm not falling for this shit.

>>55263908
i suggest reading the Radiant whitepaper if youre stuck

>>55263989
>whitepaper
More like 12 pages of rambling in 16 size font because these retards couldn't even figure out how to make their "whitepaper" seem legit. I am honestly surprised with the conviction of radiant shills in /biz/ given it's nothing but a fork.

>>55263897
>smart contracts
You got it for free by being a BCH fork. Let me go fork ETH and claim my new shit coin has smart contracts too. Would love for you shill your heart out for that coin.

>>55264023
i dont see what the issue is with it being a fork. it has all the proven security of bitcoin with a bunch of important added features. bitching about the font size in the whitepaper is some staw-grasping cope.

>>55264058
>bitching about the font size in the whitepaper
Were you dropped on your head as a kid or something? The point of bringing up the font size was that the authors knew they had no material so they stretched out their WP by increasing font size. Do us a favor and don't reproduce as I foresee water head babies in your future.

>>55264040
so we got stuff for free and made a bunch of improvements like making them compatible with EVM and allowing turing completeness? while you're still stuck at starting point with nothing? based.

>>55264091
sure but atleast we won't be unoriginal

>>55264076
the font isnt even particularly big you whiney bitch

Kaspa >>>>>>> Nexa >>> Radiant

Block speed will be irrelevant to Nexa. Nexa transactions get posted to the ledger immediately. Once UTXOs commitments become part of the algo Nexa seeks for 100k+ TPS.

Kaspa’s BPS is pretty cool for a POW. While they will have high BPS, the small block sizes and the sheer huge size of their block dag could be a limiting factor. With Nexa they take on the issue of scalability by revolutionary changes to what POW is (from algo perspective). The bottlenecks of scalability in POW have to do with signature signing and UTXO lookup. By incorporating them in the algo they turn an energy wasting mining process into something that actually helps the network scale, instead of just using it to confirm order of the block chain.

>>55265138
Meant for
>>55263799

45 posts!? In a Kaspa thread? Yaaay