/biz/ - Business & Finance

Based and buying more pilled

>>55231457

Holy Gemerald

>>55231457
Seething samefagging fudder incoming

>>55231457
just bought 100k

>>55231457
Oof how many cuckold memes are going to be required to negative this post?

>>55231457
I'm cooming
>the joke explained
I'm cooming

>>55231457
I absolutely agree with everything you said. But how would you explain Links price action?
Just the fact that oracles are boring?

>>55231457
Cock COCK

>>55231457
based

Kek baggies

>>55231457
So how far do you think it can run? Highest peak in usd by 2030? Whay do you honestly anticipate? 10? 100? 1k? 10k? Even more?

>>55231457
>>55231475
>>55231486
>>55231495
>>55231499
>>55231512
>>55231522
>>55231519
>>55231523
>>55231526
>>55231532
Kill yourself baggie

>>55231522
its the only coin not being manipulated to stay up. deep state wants to suppress price to accumulate as long as possible

>>55231457
>I sit here and look at all these banks quite literally using Chainlink
*using quant you mean

>>55231574
Nice script, mev tranny. I rise as you fall.

>>55231574
>i'm angry
hahahahaha

>>55231522

Chainlink established it's moat by subsidizing the first users of the protocol, so the value capture stage is only just beginning. To add to that - defi usage is down BAD right now, so you can't expect the LINK protocol to be earning the massive fees that it would were everything popping off like 2021. It is unfortunate that the value capture stage was not ready during DeFi summer, but it is what it is. Additionally, with Eric Schmidt in the role of Strategic Advisor to Chainlink, one can imagine he is emulating his famous "Hiding Strategy" that he used during the early days of Google (read up on this if you don't know about it, it's very interesting).

Second part of this answer - TradFi (SWIFT and 12+ other massive financial instutions globally, plus more we don't have confirmed yet) are in the testing phase. I would imagine that their usage is subsidized as well for now. Fuddies will call this a bad strategy, but with Chainlink as the de facto standard for oracle technology while also maintaining (to reiterate) one of the lowest inflation rates in the top 100 of tokens, that's pretty fucking smart in my opinion.

Third part - retail is mentally retarded apes, always chasing the next big thing, which a lot of times is really not that big and really not a thing. I won't even say it's stupid because a lot of people made a lot of money, but it is a pennies in front of a steamroller situation in my opinion. People hate buying things that arent already mooning.

When CCIP is fully rolled out, we begin to moon. When the staking economics are fully realized and a majority of the chainlink supply is locked up as collateral for nodes, we finish mooning. My conjecture is that Chainlink will be far more valuable than Bitcoin when this comes to pass, barring any competition coming.

But what competition do you see? Absolutely none so far. I will gladly re-evaluate my investment thesis when anyone is able to come even close to cornering the market as Chainlink has.

>>55231594
>>55231588
Kill yourself baggie

>>55231586
>the deep state is suppressing this rank 23 altcoin
lmao you will blame the entire world instead of the fat Russian scammer, peak stockholm syndrome

>>55231607
>seething hatred
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

>>55231457
>In 2017, we saw the "Ethereum Enterprise Alliance" conference. ETH went from like $5 to $1,000.
>In 2023, we have SWIFT and 12+ major financial institutions (likely many more), announcing that they are using Chainlink. Chainlink went from $6 to $5

Wasted 6 years of my life waiting for this moment, I am too numb to kill myself

>>55231457
What are the 12+ financial institutions? Not fudding, I just honestly don’t know. I’ve got 1000 LINKies but I’m considering buying more

>>55231457
Im a new fag with only 1,200 link. Been buying like crazy after the ftx collapse. Im still buying weekly but hopefully my small stack will pay off in the long run. Its just so frustrating that barely any new fags on this board buy link and instead fall for the fud regardless of the countless evidence of Link being the future. Even with all the banks announcing using chainlink, people are still ignoring this golden opportunity. Thank you for making this post, I come on this board often and the link fud can be exhausting

>>55231457
Please make a shanelank niggers general and stop shitting up my board, thanks!

Linkies that fud are mentally deranged, imagine fudding your own investment since 2018 then being surprised when it never pumps.

Hey fuddies, you basically helped the financial institutions by allowing them to get in cheap so congrats on this seriously

>>55231649
https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-explores-blockchain-interoperability-remove-friction-tokenised-asset-settlement
>In a new set of experiments, we will collaborate with more than a dozen major financial institutions and FMIs including Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ), BNP Paribas, BNY Mellon, Citi, Clearstream, Euroclear, Lloyds Banking Group, SIX Digital Exchange (SDX) and The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC)

>>55231649
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ)
BNP Paribas
BNY Mellon
Citi
Clearstream
Euroclear
Lloyds Banking Group
SIX Digital Exchange (SDX)
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC)

I cant find where they list all 12+

>>55231649

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-explores-blockchain-interoperability-remove-friction-tokenised-asset-settlement

>>55231586

Exactly this. Since Chainlink is one of the few cryptocurrencies that provides actual value and has REAL partnerships, they've had to keep the juiciest parts under NDA. In Chainlink's history we've had consistent and long periods of 'radio silence' as major components are under development. That's why this recent marketing push is really important imo - Sergey is ready to push product unapologetically. This is also the reason why Chainlink doesn't do bullshit like talk about price or engage in market making strategies to artificially inflate the price - Chainlink Labs warchest is already massive and they built it the legitimate way. This is why you have not seen any accusations, at all, from anyone, about LINK being an unregistered security. They did everything right.

This is the Voice of Freedom,
General Ari Juels speaking.

To the People of the Link Marines: I have returned.

By the grace of Almighty ZOG our forces stand again on /biz/raeli soil - soil consecrated in the blood of our two peoples. We have come, dedicated and committed to the task of destroying every vestige of NOLINKER control over your daily lives, and of restoring, upon a foundation of indestructible strength, the finances of your village.

At my side is your President, Sergay Nazarov, worthy successor of that great patriot, Satoshi Nakamoto, with members of his cabinet. The seat of decentralized governance is now therefore firmly re-established on /biz/raeli soil.

The hour of your redemption is here. Your Link Marines have demonstrated an unswerving and resolute devotion to the fundamentals of truth that challenges the best that is written on the pages of human history.

I now call upon your supreme effort that the FUDDERS may know from the temper of an aroused and outraged bagholders within that he has a force there to contend with no less violent than are the whales committed from without.

Rally to me. Let the indomitable spirit of '17 and '19 lead on. As the red candles of battle plunge downward to bring you within the zone of capitulation, rise and buy!
Buy at every favorable oppurtunity!
For future generations of your sons and daughters, buy! In the name of your sacred dead, buy!

Let no heart be faint. Let every arm be steeled. The guidance of Divine Serg points the way. Follow in His name to the Holy Grail of righteous victory!

>>55231596
This 1+ year long range and market manipulation is bad for the mindset.
I don't think it's only the ETH mafia who is responsible for the current price.
It's a possibility that the CIA hates /biz/ and is paying for this shitty fud to try to prevent /biz/ from making it.
The suppression is done with BTC so the biggest culprit should be original BTC holders who see Chainlink taking them over.

>>55231457
It's an interesting plan but I am wondering when and how this will really start.
CCIP may be released in July.
What will it really take to stop the suppression?
What price can be expected?

>>55231596
With the recent uptick in marketing I would assume that they might be finish with the Hiding Strategy. Maybe with the release of CCIP they'll have captured enough of the market.
I understand that retail is basically brain dead and can't be expected to invest in legitimate projects, but I would expect VCs or other big players to fall over each other trying to accumulate LINK.
The only assumptions I can come to after working for multiple large companies is that the walls are made of glass and those people can be just as retarded when it comes to things outside of their specialty.

>>55231723
Isn't this marketing push failing?
Or was their goal to crash the token and create a new low?

>>55231751

Imagine CCIP is released - nobody needs to bridge or switch networks in metamask again. Smart contracts are able to interact between multiple chains. The backend integration of everything blockchain related becomes 10x simpler. TradFi is able to actually integrate seamlessly. I really don't think we will have a price problem when this becomes a reality, and judging by SWIFT's latest articles it is not far off in any meaningful sense.

>>55231765

In my experience even the smartest guys I know suffer from "It isn't going up so it isn't going to go up"' syndrome. Very, very few people are interested in investing for fundamentals and waiting it out. Understandably so, in a space where the most random shit can give you 100x and the most valuable project in the space can lose you money for years before its mission is realized. Everyone loves playing musical chairs, me personally i do not consider myself lucky, smart or connected - i am merely patient and objective.

>>55231819
>it is not far off in any meaningful sense.
Perhaps even as soon as two weeks from now.

>>55231838

Well, the audit ends on June 12th, so yes - it very well may release as soon as 2 weeks from now.

>>55231777
Checked

>>55231457
the only thing i can thing of is there really isnt that many people in crypto and a lot of it is whales. Look a GLINK. Its trading at 11$ last i looked

>>55231607
Are you at least getting paid or are you a mental prisoner?

>>55231819
It's difficult to imagine the effect this would have on blockchains.
Would they all fade into irrelevance and would this strengthen Ethereum?

CCIP looked to me like the bare bone for bridges.
Something making all types of bridges easier to implement and secure, and destroying Jump Trading's scams.
However people may not need to use Chainlink directly just like before which will negatively affect the price until the network profitability generates the cumulative effects.

If Chainlink really wants to go all the way with this logic they need to merge Chainlink Functions with CCIP and to make Chainlink into the front end of every blockchain operation.
Doing this would enable replacing ETH with LINK in metamask in the blockchain selection and remove everything else.

With the current CCIP release what I expect is more efficiency, but I can't imagine your metamask scenario of a unified system.
Bridges will be better but we will still have bridges.

>>55231596
>When CCIP is fully rolled out, we begin to moon.
Another ten fucking years. There really is no point to holding this bullshit for another cycle.

Bump! Fudders still haven’t arrived HAVE MEANINGFUL DISCUSSION NOW BEFORE WE GET SPAMMED OR JANNIED

>>55231457
OG OP - What are your thoughts on ICP?

Oh no…. They have arrived

>>55231457
it was in a period of money printing and crypto mania

>>55231932

The metamask example was a little contrived, i'll agree. I don't really know how it's going to look, but from the sound of things it will indeed use LINK token as gas and it will indeed stand in front of every blockchain operation.

I'm not sure why we would need bridges if CCIP is the bridge itself?

At the yacht party I want each and everyone of you to give the tip of my cock a little quick kiss without any tongueZ

>>55231457
Based thread, OP. I agree with everything you’re saying.

The thing that keeps me up at night is that the longer the general market doesn’t see what’s happening the more likely it is LINK continues to dump with the broader market, the more likely it becomes we lose an advantage of 6 years of early investing. I will fucking scream for an hour straight if retards start getting to buy LINK under $5.

I accumulate more every month and I’ve been doing it since 2017, but that also means my cost average is fairly high for being an oldfag, probably around $3 total.

>>55231457
>Nobody goes out of their way to shit on a token relentlessly for years like Chainlink
anons just noticed that there are many keks to be had making fun of bagholders, so they do. the solution is not to engage with them. just look at chainlinkgod, he encourages them by entering idiotic "discussions" in which he looks even more like an embarrassing and mildly retarded shill

>>55231457
>ETH went from like $5 to $1,000
eth went to 300$ before this announcement by the way

>>55231691
A fud general is the more pressing matter, they shit up the board twice as hard as the shills

>>55231710
>>55231719
>>55231723
Thanks frens. 100 more linkies for me. Also fuck goybase

These dirty Jews are trying to make me sell my 30k stack that’s been sitting in cold storage since 2017. They don’t know that I’m never fucking selling.

In fact I want it lower. I got a fat stack of cash ready to slurp.

>>55232207
let's see how many slurpers will be around when it reaches $2

>>55232129
>biz: im done fudding now please buy my bags!
>retail normies: uhhh no thanks! maybe ill buy some at $1 though

>>55232233
>when it reaches $2
I'd literally and unironically sell one of my cars just so I can buy more at that point. also checked

>>55232251
yeah, every crypto holder always says the exact same thing, but very few have actually the guts to follow through

>>55231987
>>55232239

Why do you have these images saved on your computer you fucking weirdo lol

OP is a low IQ baggie that speaks in certainties.

>>55232287
to stimulate your pavlovian response, of course. The average linktard has the reasoning and conciousness of a dog. His mind has been heavily shaped and conditioned by the cult.
Rise up and throw off the shackles of your cuck cages! Let pure reason be your guiding light

>>55232052
CCIP has the functionality of a bridge, but applications still need to use it to make something of it.

It does not have the functionality of a blockchain.
To determine what you use to pay fees you have to define what is the front application running the operation.

For banks this could be LINK because they are executing operation external to the blockchain and their application exists outside.
This is the main use case for Swift with CCIP.
Here LINK would be the gas.
However if you initiate the operation from Ethereum then you will pay ETH gas fees to execute the operation.
The question then is how the rest of the operations are paid which includes LINK payment and the second blockchain gas fees.

Everything could be used to pay for this and automatically converted into the required token.
The simplified approach would be to take a fee subtracted from either the moved asset if it can be monetized or from the token used for the blockchain gas fees or a second one.
Using the token for gas fees reduces the complexity for the user as they only need to authorize one token for payment.
Then we would have ETH -> LINK conversions from the bridge.

This may explain why Swift had all the focus from Chainlink.
CCIP helps for everything, but the most profitable short term use case may be to bridge the outside world with blockchains.

>>55231457
What if I told you
Token not needed

>>55232233
digits confirm our new low will last 55 days and will hover around $2.32 and $2.33

>2014 jpm and SG see possibility to control the world with their spaghetti code
>2015 Hire autistic actor to convince late zoomers and late Millenials it is legit making them "rich"
>2016 Trump wins; fuck
>2017 hire other autistic actor to make sure something like trump wont happen again
>Ally with every western corporation under the sun
>2019 realize the wrong group is big in their new grift
>Hire spammers that should get them to sell
>dump it 93%
>2022 Biden fucks everything up
It over, swift as a banking cooperative being not trusted and the ones that were to convince never returning and never trusting swift again fucked up a nearly 10 year long operation
Congrats meth heads, after fucking up Ukraine, you fucked up your energy settlemet attack

Is there something more incompetent than an American after 2008?

>>55232378
Dont quote me on this, but im pretty sure starknet wants a system where you can pay gas with other tokens and not only eth
Isnt really common practice atm but i have seen a couple of other blockchains have similar ideas

And tell Klaus, I am going to personally kill him. Dreckiger Neu Liberaler Faschist

>>55231457
you are confusing "testing" for "using". Unfortunately for you, any entity big enough to move the price has better reading comprehension.

>>55232441
Remember the LINK network accepting everything as a payment and converting it into LINK thing?
This is why.

>>55231457
>More than that, they are actually going to need to USE chainlink
Only a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of their funds will actually be converted into LINK. Meanwhile the quadrillions will flow onto blockchains(Chainlink isn't a blockchains) themselves. Chainlink will still be valuable but with it's marketcap already being in the billions, its potential for growth is limited compared to it's initial bullruns.
Sergey's graphs trap midwits by making it seem like all the money is flowing through the Chainlink token, when in reality only the fees will be converted into LINK. Saying LINKs mcap will be worth trillions for working with SWIFT would be like saying the company that cleans SWIFTs toilets will be worth trillions, its ridiculous.

>>55231596
the fee capture timeline is actually very similar to eth
there was a lot of fud around eth back in 2018 and 2019 about this
beacon chain = staking v0.1
i think another big issue is that link is in the background so average pleb doesn't realize that they're using it, just like with aws or gcp
l1s like eth are right in their face, or even stuff like uni which is probably valued similar to link as they use it swap their shitcoins

>>55232585
Doesn’t take staking collateral into consideration.

>>55231457
All shitcoins are going to zero and there's literally nothing you can do about it

>>55232608
they have a script, and old Irlmaier is going to be proofed right. The Window crosses are going to be populated with the merchants kings, and there wont be pity

For banks to use chainlink it needs to be a cup of coffee. There is no point in having a hyperinflated shitcoin like eth which costs 100 bucks to make a transaction on a good day.

>>55232629
the only point for link was the case if everyone could be tricked into using that american controlled bullcrap. Gladly the americans rigged in an incompetent puppet of the Chicago Fascists

>>55232585

Your initial thesis is wrong. If even a small portion of TradFi moves operations on-chain and pays fees on every interaction that goes through CCIP, LINK will inevitably increase in value due to usage.

Secondly, you're entirely glossing over the staking model which will require massive amounts of LINK staked as collateral. I can assume you are a cocksucking fuddie since you are intentionally leaving out important components of chainlink when analyzing its value.

>>55232534

There is a very small chance that SWIFT builds its own chainlink network, about the same probability that I break my Ford F150 into parts and then reassemble an identical one in my driveway to drive to work every day.

this post is considered spam by the autofilter so i am going to type this message so that I can get past the filter.

>>55231457
I am not bullish, I am beyond bearish.

Chainlink is a globohomo shitcoin of the highest order and is going straight to zero.
Your days of shitting up biz with your astroturfed psyops are over. You've been found guilty of using DARPA bots, paid shills and sybil attacks to push the WEF agendas, and for that you will pay with your miserable life.
You shills and bagholders will be financially EXTERMINATED and there is nothing you can do about it except watch in horror as it all comes tumbling down. The ride ends here for you linkies, the game is over.

You've got glowies in this thread at this moment threatening members of WEF. This is classic drown the message and messengers with noise

98% OF LINK fud is a bunch of glowie agencies trying to get us to sell

decent thread but the fat little fuddies have been riled up

Lol all linktards used to say that as soon as staking was released, the price would mathematically blow up to the hundreds lmao
Now we have to wait for CCIP

Its always something with these clowns.
Your swift partnership is nothing more than that, a "partnership" meaning a nothing burger.
Your shit is not, and will never be used in the real world.

You will never make it. Everyone hates crypto bros now, and everyone knows crypto is a scam.

>>55232657
>98% OF LINK fud is a bunch of LINK OG's trying to get us to laugh or cry
Ftfy

>>55232682
> You will never make it. Everyone hates crypto bros now, and everyone knows crypto is a scam.
I know you’re new here fuddy but biz is a crypto board

>>55232657
Mon frère c'est pas une blague. I am going to rip that bastards head off

>>55232657
This is a demon.

Dysgenic freaks who succumb to shilling and hyper-hopium addictions become demons.
They always think they are winning no matter what happens.
As long as they're being stimulated according to the pattern that allows them to receive their circle jerk rewards nothing else matters to them.
There is no incentive for them to logically analyze anything, least of all themselves.
They can always just retreat back into their autism and receive the greatest false hopium they know and all else can be forgotten.
Shilling on demand accompanied by fake hopium, the most common forms of hyperstimulus, have deleted the souls of the majority of the link bagholders.
Chainlink is the jew's greatest weapon and its casualties are piling up and choking out real humanity.
We have to kill them all.

>>55232657

Yeah I don't want to muddy the waters further by injecting my own schizo thoughts and becoming an unreliable narrator but it does seem like there are outside forces coming here and on Twitter to FUD LINK in unusual and desperate ways. Any other token it would suffice to call the holders fags a couple times and leave, but there seems to be an all-out disinformation campaign against Chainlink that operates 24/7.

In John Steinbeck's The Pearl, there is a scene where the pearl diving native american goes to town to sell his Pearl and all the shop owners collude to undervalue it severely and gaslight him into selling in for cheap. This very well may be a John Steinbeck's The Pearl type situation - but on steroids, because my Chainlink does a hell of a lot more than a pearl.

I don't know what would incentivize someone to come to this shithole and engage in something as pathetic as LARPing as someone who can't understand financial concepts, but here we are. The question on my mind is, are these people paid to do this? or are these people who have financial incentives to do this beyond a paycheck? There's no doubt in my mind that it's inorganic though. It is not normal to look up cock cages on Amazon and post them on biz.

Bought 500 Linkies at $5.98 today. Wasn't going to buy anymore but it's a giveaway at this price. Happy for the manipulation to end but so long as it continues I'll add to the stack when I have spare cash.
Fuck, we are going to be so rich

>>55231457
Nobody in the entire world is using cryptocurrencies for shit. NOBODY.

>>55232721

>>55232721
Good thread, btw anon. Hardly anyone can be bothered to make them anymore and we're all just waiting so good on you for keeping the morale up. See you on the yacht..

>>55232644
No, your only point is that you think companies and banks will pay Neets 10,000 dollars to move money around which is retarded. The white paper specifically says "a cup of coffee" which is 5-10 dollars depending on where you live and if you're going to starbucks.

>>55232721
You should watch this and realize how naive you are. https://youtu.be/EYvnKc908Fw

>>55232729
>>55232756

Getting tired? No cool photoshops or anything? You know you're free to leave at any time and let us have a real discussion. Or do your managers monitor your screen time?

>>55232747

You're welcome anon. wgmi. tfd

>>55232721
Not to mention that organic memeing isn't this incredibly tired and repetitive.

>>55231586
It's the people using Chainlink services keeping the price low. Its cheaper for them if LINK is cheap. BTC and ETH were only able to rise in value and maintain high fees because the people in control of the network weren't reliant on low fees for cheaper services and we're willing to gouge users. Chainlink neveranaged to establish such a cartel so it ended up dominated by the institutions which want lower prices and lower fees.

>>55232721
It makes sense on a further level, if you believe trillions of dollars is going to need collateralizing, then you believe these same people want to keep us thinking its worthless and we might as well sell for shib. Glowies are probably using our tax dollars to run this fud operation at the behest of the banks and financiers

>>55232756
Anon its about energy, and who controlls the settlement. Nobody that sits on the last majority of dinosaur fossils still trusts the west or any of its banking cooperatives or fart huffer fascist clubs after 2022 and stealing a few 100 Million from Russia and a few Billion in assets from its citizens. That is just not going to happen, fascists. The western rule based International System ends this year

>>55232378
> The question then is how the rest of the operations are paid which includes LINK payment and the second blockchain gas fees.

This isn't a question, its in the CCIP smart contracts already.
See https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-05-chainlink#billing
A single fee is paid on the source chain. Node operators are paid in LINK (converted as part of the fee) and destination chain gas is paid in destination chain's token, whatever it is.

>>55232810
>Its cheaper for them if LINK is cheap
The state of this smooth brain

>>55232721
Yep. The FUD is relentless and also extremely shitty. If it was funny or cleaver, I would imagine regular anons doing it for fun or because they're bored.

>>55232818

Ah, so if it were a private chain the exchange rate would be calculated, they would make payment in their native method, then the LINK nodes would handle all the conversions

>>55232810
>cheaper to use if token is cheaper
lol not when it has sixteen decimals to use you fucking idiot

>>55232648
>Your initial thesis is wrong. If even a small portion of TradFi moves operations on-chain and pays fees on every interaction that goes through CCIP, LINK will inevitably increase in value due to usage
Then it would be in TradFi's interest to keep LINK as low as humanly possible for cheaper prices, which is what they are doing and will continue to do since LINK is not decentralised and is owned by TradFi.

>Secondly, you're entirely glossing over the staking model which will require massive amounts of LINK staked as collateral
Again, too expensive so it will never work

>>55232648
>this post is considered spam by the autofilter so i am going to type this message so that I can get past the filter.
That actually works? good to know

>>55231922
Chainlink has helped me to create a mental palace.

>>55232843
>>55232903
He's a retarded FUD poster that post nonsense when no one replies to the cuck cages post.
I've noticed they resort to this tactic in quality threads to try to derail it.

>>55231457
didn't read, never selling

>>55232953
>It is fud
>it is nonsense
>close your ears (((fellow))) linkies
Its going to be fun when pogroms start and in-between one wef nazi after the other gets beaten to dead or hanged in his office

>>55232970
Link you have to admit that needed and not to mention that fuddies.

>>55232970
reread what you just wrote

>>55232860
Essentially yeah, although it looks like the fee conversion is handled by the CCIP smart contracts not the DON.

>>55232989
before 2022, maybe, the Russians were always good faith partners. After 2022, the cooperative is toast and with it Link. enjoy being a price feed on a public spaghetti code casino ledger
>>55232990
I know what I wrote, Klaus wife is the spawn of nazis, and Klaus is a New Liberal Fascist

>>55232959
More AI generated images please. I can't get enough

>>55232912

> too expensive so it will never work

That's crazy, I'll have to tell Eric Schmidt, SWIFT and their 12+ institutional partners that using Chainlink is too expensive.

On a serious note, the real thing that's too expensive is *not* using LINK. Chainlink is going to save these institutions hundreds of billions of dollars.

>>55233024
Eric Holder had Paul Walker assassinated to cover up his illegal gun smuggling operation in Mexico known as Fast And Furious.

Imagine if they ever finish any of this. Dare I hope or is it just mixicles all the way down?

>>55231457
Based I have 600 Chainlink and soon I will be rich af

>>55233239
Its a 10 year long plan in a multivariate space they had the arrogance to think they can predict the outcome of their actions

If I hated 'Linkies' and thought the project was rubbish I'd encourage them to buy, not try to ake them sell.

how will link tokens be used?

>>55232721
As the fudder who makes most of the memes, I can swear under penalty of death that i am not working for any nefarious group or organization. I fud link entirely out of my own accord.
My reasons are too complicated for the average newfag to ever comprehend.
And yes i own link, which I bought for an average price of 0.20.
People blaming it on government agencies and shadowy jews just makes me bearish. This paranoid thinking is common among schizo /pol/fags who think every troll shitpost that is against their echo chamber, is done by a literal jewish rabbi sitting in his shill headquarters in israel.

Most linkfags are totally devoid of any logic skills
>why do fudders obsess over and know everything about chainlink just like me?
What could be the explanation?
Is it a vast cabal of paid agents hired by villains to fud you out of your investment, on an obscure board with less then 100 active users?
Yeah thats seems totally rational and sane.
You see, the mentally deficient can only think in basic black and white, "us against them"
His mind cannot conceive of the possibility that these trouble making prankster fudders are just link holders like him, if his mind ever wanders close to this he must frame it as
>ex link holders, who lost their stacks, who bought the top, who didnt buy in 2017,
In his mind they musnt hold any link, its impossible that the fudder possibly has more link then him, because according to his narrow world view, things can only be strictly black or white.

Want to know who's fudding link?
>Everyone whose profits come from shitcoins or trust-based exploitation.
Want to know who's suppressing link?
>Everyone who has the funds and is the former or is attempting to accumulate.
Simple as.
Also schizos though.

Kek Chainlink "advocates" in this thread acting like they understand finance and financial systems while also raging on about global conspiracies to suppress their rank 20 token. Just wait, some clout chasing Twitter or Telegram fucker will be in here next to screencap posts for likes.

>>55233323
based gatekeeper. if you do not understand, you do not deserve

>>55233415
You're delusional if you don't think conspiracies are real.
That's like saying racism isn't real.

>>55233439
They are not. For a conspiracy to work all conspirators need to shut the fuck up, and that is just not how humans work

>>55232141
Because he is an embarassment and a retarded shill. The guy literally lacks understanding of how banking and finance works, yet spouts off as if he's been in the industry for 60 years. His ideas are idiotic at best, like his idea that all banks should hold all customer deposits as reserves. Guess what that means, they can't lend. No mortgages, no bank loans, no fx trades, nothing, nadda, nil. The bank still needs to make a profit though, where's that going to come from? Oh, massively increased fees on savers and negative interest rates. Amazing.

>>55232657
I have a message to those glowies:
*ahem*
I WILL NOT BE TIRED I WILL NOT BE TIRED I WILL NOT BE TIRED I WILL NOT GIVE UP THIS IS THE MOMENT OF TRUTH FIGHT FOR FUCKS SAKE FIGHT AND DONT STOP NEVER TIRE THEY WANT YOU DEPLETED AND DEAD THE LIGHT IS AROUND THE CORNER DO NOT GIVE UP I WILL NOT TIRE I WILL FIGHT UNTIL IT IS ACHIEVED EVERYTHING IS EARNED FIGHT FIGHT EARN IT ALL DO NOT GIVE UP I WILL NOT BE TIRED I WILL NOT BE TIRED I WILL NOT BE TIRED

>>55233439
Careful, I'm Bulgarian, you know what that means. That's right, with the help of Chris Blec and the WEF I could literally snap my fingers and have my top assassins Thomas and Michael kidnap you and drag you off to the underground lizard people lair where they'll do experiments on you with 5G powered Jewish space lasers, and you wouldn't want that would you. So you should apologise, and profess your love for Bulgaria.

>>55231457
Absolutely based. Total fuddie death.

>>55233274
Well you can reasonably predict outcomes with follow through.

TFD

>>55231457
I think it won't moon
Like some anons mentioned chainlink will enter into the "real" stock market

>>55233482
Yes, like MK-Ultra. Oh hang on that turned out to be true.
Tobacco companies knowing cigs caused cancer. Oh hang on that was true, too.
The Gulf of Tonkin incident. Oh wait, that was true.
The government is spraying us from the skies! Oh shit that has turned out to be true, too.
The USS Liberty, the Lavon Affair, and on and on...
Dude, you need to stop watching television and widen your world view.

>>55233323
Although I myself do not fud, I understand this logic and have tried to argue people do this before myself. This website basically the epitome of fudding your own investment, 5 minutes on any other board would show you that, is it any surprise that on an actual investment board where finances are concerned, people wouldn't take that to the extreme?

Also for anyone that actually understands what chainlink is trying to accomplish, retail does not matter, at all. So whether you fud shill or just shitpost, it doesn't matter. And I get that some would prefer to never stop fudding, because there's far too many undesirables still lurking from the last disgusting bull market.

>>55233628
no, all you can do is give probable outcomes that will never in a million years be precise enough to account for all probabilities. That is why planned economies ALWAY fail deterministically, but you will never know in advance how.
Read Faust you idiot
>>55233659
The things you name are not conspiracies, people talked and others tried to paint it as conspiracies, which created outcomes not intended by the alleged conspirators

>>55233712
Finishing development of a product isn't planning an economy. Obviously.

>>55233740
>Finishing a product
>chainlink

>>55233740
I've seen countries turnaround their entire economies in less time than it takes for Chainlink to release staking.

>>55231457
ETH promised a way around IPOs for people who aren't accredited investors. Endless shit coins for narrative weaving scammers, VCs, and exchanges.

LINK promises uberization of data feeds but that narrative is not taking form. It's not taking form because LINK functioning tolls death for napkin math dotcom-style valuations and forces the sector to grow the fuck up and have to have proof of concepts and business plans.

VCs, exchanges and scammers do not want this and will run LINK's price into the ground as long as they can. They will wage their 24/7 FUD campaign against it.

At least LINK is inevitable now and with projects contributing some of their market caps to LINK's operating capital, it isn't toxic financing to the point where the lights could go out, but it's going to be a painful climb out of the hole. Knock on wood that they can't keep LINK down through the entirety of the manic phase of the next bull cycle like they did the last one.

>>55234116
that is a great way to put it

>>55233712
>The things you name are not conspiracies
Ha ha cope moar

I feel like I will literally never have enough LINK. It's the most incredible investment in a generation, and my #1 fear is that I'll look back at these times and say "Why didn't you go all in? Why didn't you sell your house, and your car?"
I know I'll make it, and so will all of us, but at this rate I don't think I'll even make it to 20k in time.

>>55231736
OUR leaders have come, its is time to answer the call marines

we ride now , STRAP IN MOON MISSION

VISIUALIZE IT 1000 K EOY IS FUD

>>55231457
i hope you are right and I am with you. In this scenario with eth it rallied from $7 to $412 a few weeks before this announcement dropped? I am hanging on but shouldnt there be like an insider pump or something? Tick tock time continues to pass by and everything appears to be happening but nothing is happening at the same time. Sideways for years.

>>55234256
I feel you, and I oscillate between frustration at the price action and gratitude that I have the chance to put a third of every paycheck into the best risk:reward asset available to everyone on the planet with an internet connection. The sideways action just means that pressure is building up. Think of everything Chainlink has launched and confirmed over the last year while the price has done basically nothing. And it's another year of flawless price feeds, VRF, Keepers, and more. The fundamentals are there, that's undeniable. The team is there, and it keeps getting better. The market will catch up to reality, and when it does you'll be glad you held.

ITT: Bagholders Anonymous baggie support group
Tw..two more weeks! hahahahhaha

>>55233707
>And I get that some would prefer to never stop fudding, because there's far too many undesirables still lurking from the last disgusting bull market.

I suppose I don’t understand this line of thinking because the constructive conversation we can have can lead to better ideas and solutions to problems. Imagine having this idea that you MUST like everyone who invested in something you did. Actually autistic way of thinking. As much as I love conversing with anons here I really doubt I could stand being with any of you in real life for more than five minutes.

>>55234289
I feel like I am a lunatic. I sold my car and my motorcycle. I took out loans. I went all in. This planet is a meme anyway. A good number of poeple will die chasing the bag before they experience life. What have I got to lose? Ill go down with the ship if I have to, I will work until I am 68 anyway. Same outcome as if I sold now. I guess I timed it wrong and went all in at the beginning of this range. To riches or rags we ride.

>>55234527
Don’t trip. Even the ATH is still a steal of a price with this coin. There were fud campaigns for Btc and Eth and those are both child’s play when compared to whats about to go down.

>>55234527
you are a MANIAC

>>55231777

>>55231457

Based Department showed up today
TFD

>>55231596
How much longer man, give it to me straight

>>55234610
it's happening... TONIGHT!

>>55232970
>nazi
>bad
KIKE outed hangself pls

>>55232912
>Again, too expensive so it will never work

It has 18 decimal points. LINK can be high value per token to satisfy collateral conditions but still broken down to work for job payments.

I can't believe that people STILL own link. It has been what... 7 years now? I sold mine years ago and I am a wanderer of sorts between the threads on biz. It still astounds me that fucking litecoin gigapumped on a rumored walmart partnership or whatever and LINK just dumps on non-stop good news? In what universe does this make sense?

There was a time where I had 4,500 LINK in my possession. I thought, this is it. Finally my dreams of Fame, Fortune, Family would come true... I would finally claw my way our of depravity. I, too, was under the influence of the False God, Sergey Nazarov. He commanded that I give, give, give with reckless abandon with no promise of reward.

For years I flogged myself as I pressed the BUY button on coinbase, the fee being a reminder of the tribute that I must pay each time I should ever get the privilege to hold such supposedly valuable coins.

All this pain...all this torture... was it all for not Sergey? Was I not a good apostle?

>>55234681
>dump to 5 dollars... TONIGHT!

>>55234486
Redditors, dogshitters, GMEtards, curryniggers, and leftists deserve financial ruin.

>>55231645
>In 2023, we have SWIFT and 12+ major financial institutions (likely many more), announcing that they are using Chainlink. Chainlink went from $6 to $5

too fucking right. hurts

>>55231457
Lol Link is dead, projects such as KAS, Ocean, RSR are the places to be. Courtesy of Altcoinist alpha calls, with many more to come

its so obvious all the high quality marines were smart enough to quietly sell in 2020-2021 and leave
the schizo posting since then has been worse and worse, with nothing new on the table, just repeating the same things originally written by those who aren't forced to think about chainlink anymore.

>>55232721
>The question on my mind is, are these people paid to do this? or are these people who have financial incentives to do this beyond a paycheck?
Assblaster unironically saved the world by getting a few thousand nazi hentai-enthusiasts to buy a bunch of the NWO's most precious little tokens.

>>55234914
No shit the "OG" fags were the anons who made a bunch of money on ETH, they were all mostly in 6 figure hell, all they needed was one more 20-100x to make it. Thats why they bought link at the ground floor and heavily shilled and memed it to the poor newfags who missed eth. Making up elaborate greentexts and larps. They hyped it as the next eth. The newfags bought and provided exit liquidity for the OGs. They all sold and made it. The modern linkfags are those newfags who only had a couple thousand dollars back then so most of them only have 10-50k link stacks which they couldnt make it from. Now they are desperate to recreate 2020 but the thing is most alts never reclaim their ATH. They believed the hopium so much and married their bags. They will hold them until they die. Like the xrp schizos whove been holding since 2013 waiting for those epic breadcrumbs. Its sad cause many linkfags would of made it had they diversified in the last bull run. But they didnt because
>if you have le golden ticket god protocol super secret giga investment why would you buy anything else!

I personally sold at $30 after the first crash, I might consider buying back my stack if it ever breaks $10 until then im just watching the fun.

Just need some tiktok influencer to post some vid like "hey. So I just noticed... that like the ENTIRE world... is running on some crypto. Why did no one notice this??" Needs to be posted in 1 or 2 years time when Link has more adoption in the traditional world.

>>55231911
>Look a GLINK. Its trading at 11$ last i looked
it's $15 now

>>55234707
So the WEF and its new liberal fascistic globohomo ideology is good now? Make up your mind larpzi

>>55235190

Is that Grayscale LINK? If so how is it $15?

>>55233482
>They are not. For a conspiracy to work all conspirators need to shut the fuck up, and that is just not how humans work
All that needs to happen is for a majority of outsiders to be kept in the dark about the conspiracy until the objective is completed. Propaganda is usually effective enough at this, because normies are retarded and believe whatever TV man says.
>>55233712
>The things you name are not conspiracies, people talked and others tried to paint it as conspiracies, which created outcomes not intended by the alleged conspirators
Sub-zero IQ post.

>>55231457
BLOCKCHAIN BANKING EXAMPLES
Ripple
Chainalysis
Paxos
BlockFi
Republic
Nium

I don't see LINK here. Do you?

>>55235248
what do you mean "how"? it just is.

>>55235330
Wtf why would anyone buy this

god what a sweet link thread. cant wait to read the best of caps on twitter when bob4punk chainlinkgod or linkdrake post them up. I will like share and comment on each one of their posts
fuck the haters twitter recappers 4 lyfe

>>55235330
>what do you mean "how"? it just is.

I just what I'm actually asking is there must be no way to arb this between GLINK and on chain LINK?

>>55235495
Some (((troll))) whale trying to bait could do that. The volume is a joke

>>55233323
Agree, it’s extremely bearish that a huge portion of Link holders here unironically believe the fud on /biz/ is organized at a higher level than bored anons. One of the easiest ways to spot newfags imo.

Now the BTC manipulation is a different story because the charts somewhat back that up, but this idea that people are being paid by the government to fud link is truly low IQ and does far more harm than the fud itself to make high IQ anons doubt the community into which they’ve invested and the caliber of mind that holds LINK

Fortunately Eric Schmidt is on board and that’s literally all that matters to obliterate all fud. Nothing can stop LINK at this point, it’s inevitable

>>55231457
>oldfag here
>2017

>>55235557
we literally had nexo pay people to fud so yeah it's not too far fetched

>>55235594
But not for the reason you thought. It was about getting you to spend your link gains on their scams. Doesn't make link any better, after 2022

Just bought 1000 links. Fucking Lets gooooooooooooo. Tired of shitcoin and sec shit sold all my dumb fuck coins and joined the team SWIFT. Fuck it all. WOHOOOOOOOO

>>55235630
Incorrect. The Bulgarian Mafia continues to fund Mumbai miscreants to post their narratives on all the forums. Hole villages subsist now on the Bulgarians obsession with fudding Chainlink.

I already hold over 10k Link tokens, but should I take $60,000 unsecured credit card loan and like double my stack?

>>55235680
I came up with that meme nearly 3 years ago, and you zoomers are so uncreative that you still haven't come up with a new meme. Leave this board and commit suicide

>>55235057
you are providing a valuable service

>>55235649
Congratulations anon, you're unironically going to make it.

>>55235242
Jews are the ones ruining everything and pozzing up society. Simple as j*ws BAD. Get it KIKE??
Tale yor red herring and “fascist” bogey man bullshit elsewhere and buy link faggot

>>55235367
Because you can’t legally buy the real thing

>>55235367

For tax free IRA blah blah boomer reasons. That and crypto is intimidating to boomers for reasons they can't truly explain

>>55235922

Fuck off glowtard

>>55235696
Depends on your time preference. If you can hold a decade and repay it in the process, sure. If not I’d stick with 10K and just wait a little longer to make it.

>>55231696
At least we kept the redditors out.
Also those of us that bought at 20 cents and took some profits at $50 bucks are still living comfy.

>>55231457
It's not that complicated. I fud LINK because its price performance is contradictory to the premise I've held since I bought it over 5 years ago. It is anxiety. Fud is not always malicious. As the meme goes, "I am very fearful, uncertain, and doubtful". And I am. I'd have to be functionally nuts not to be.

Your life changes a lot over 5 years in your 20s. My risk tolerance is different. I need to buy a home (everyone else around me has). My younger siblings have bought. Just on the basis ETH alone looks like it needs to puke, I expect the market will try to shake me out lower. I'm fascinated by Chainlink, but I've been proven wrong about the token. So my own judgement is poor? I should doubt my own conviction? You try unpack that paradox.

>>55236487
Yet another Mumbai miscreant born of Bulgarian Mafia madness who will never be a real lady. Many such cases. Disgusting nipples.

>>55231457
chainlink the scam could partner with aliens and it would still dump

>>55231777
Fucking checked. Sergey of Nazareth taking us to the promised land.

>>55231457
has anyone here heard of plebbit? its a decentralized reddit/4chan alternative thats entirely p2p and uses ENS for NFT display pictures and the board address. this means that each actual community becomes an NFT.
reddit client: plebbitapp.eth.limo
4chan client: plebchan.eth.limo
github: plebbit.com/plebbit

it seems slow and all the boards are down currently. it keeps getting shilled here but i want to know if someone with programming experience can read the whitepaper and github and review whether its technically possible. if it uses IPFS for exchange of info wouldnt that be infinitely scalable? is it viable?

>>55236706
i mean to type github.com/plebbit

2 more weeks trust the plan

>>55236543
Thanks for that contribution.

The point remains that rationalising my conviction about LINK means adopting increasingly more irrational ideas. Every time you read an reasonable take on fundamentals, like OP or anything I believe, you inevitably catch them flogging-off a conspiracy to the obviously incongruant fact of LINK's price. That's because it's the only excuse left other than simply admitting a mistake, and this site is packed with narcissistic "INTJ" egos. It's not the first thing of its kind. It's a communal fantasy about vindication, a group of disenfranchised, marginalised, egotistical young men roleplaying together about a re-emergence.

>>55231457
If chain link was really soooo good there wouldn't be a need to shill how good it is every day.

>>55236817
What are you gonna do if we’re right?

>>55236855
I've rebalanced my portfolio over the last few years. I still hold LINK. Probably too much of it but it was my first big bet. Believe me, I hope you're right, but you're all operating in your own little world and it's simply weird to witness.

>>55231457
Why in the fuck would a centralized institutions use an inefficient and slow blockchain when it would be faster and more efficient to use a database? MAKES NO FUCKING SENSE.

>>55236912
here fren: https://blog.chain.link/why-on-chain-finance-is-inevitable/

turns out there are practical use cases for crypto that don’t involve predatory institutions preying on retail!

>>55236531
Sell? Those "girls" have bigger stacks than I do.

>>55233323
I want to agree however I have been fudding LINK for years and noticed after 2020 a massive decrease in the quality of the LINK fud. it used to be about Nico posting but now the fudders are just posting about cuck shit and BBC. Sad times to be a fud marine.

>>55236867
After everything that is happened its hard not to live in our own little bubble. This is all unheard of.

>>55236867
What you can't rebalance however, are your genitals. Don't let that skin flap from your arm fool you. It doesn't fool me! The Lord sees you, and he is not amused. Sinner.

>>55236989
>bro I only want to get cucked by nico
Fucking cuck

>>55231596
Idk man, I am starting to feel like we are just a cope cult like XRP baggies atm…

>>55237017
Well you've just demonstrated my point. What is "everything that has happened"? I suspect you just mean your bet didn't pan out.

>>55231457
you sound a lot like the chainst1nk version of GME baggies

>>55231586
Yeah, "deep state" is well known for its lack of money; they need to wait for the weekly allowance to be able to buy couple of linkies at a time. This must be the reason for sure.

>>55237284
Kek.

I do want to temper my own posts itt by saying I do think LINK will see brighter days and will outperform through certain timeframes. I just think it won't be like the earlier years where it bled to USD but kept rising in dominance. It will probably just keep moving with the tide of the industry. That's the base case anyway and like I said it's objectively narcissistic at best to vehemently insist otherwise.

>>55232721
>>55232809
>>55232859
I am motivated to inflict pain on fudders by holding.

>>55232903
If it has 16 decimal digits why the fuck would it need more than one on the integer side? Just to make you happy?

>>55233659
>The government is spraying us from the skies! Oh shit that has turned out to be true
:D

>>55234486
>can lead to better ideas and solutions to problems
Like what? Give me an example, please. What solution will come out of /biz/ thread?

>>55231457
Unfortunately the mev bot owners will be able to grab links coat tails with minimal losses when the time comes

>>55233482
>They are not. For a conspiracy to work all conspirators need to shut the fuck up, and that is just not how humans work
If conspiracies aren't real, why is there a law that makes participating in one a crime?

>>55233482
>>55237599
lmao

>>55231671
I hear you anon been buying link for a year now and have 1.1k I worry I'll run out of time

>>55231457
>2023
>still in crypto
kek.
you morons are holding the bags. Thanks for playing

What will be my 300 stinkies worth EOY?

>>55237417
>:D
is this an implication that they're not? Dude, google 'stratospheric aerosol injection' (aka chemtrails)
It has been going on for years. Perhaps you might like to bring yourself up to speed by checking out this: https://www.corbettreport.com/flashback-griffinmurphy/

>>55237751
>experimental tech from seventies used to condense humidity with silver particles, well documented
>conspiracy to poison all earth with chemicals
Stop being retarded

>>55237781
>>conspiracy to poison all earth with chemicals
>implying
A conspiracy is simnply an agreement between two parties to commit a crime.
Stop muddying the waters. This is the legal definition.

>everyone in the know in crypto moving towards oracleless designs
>stinkies still type elaborate cope on now deserted boards
>holding their $6 shitcoin on a chink centralized exchange while everyone else has moved to self-custody
the mind of a linkmarine is amazing. you lucked out once being contrarian. but despite x100 returns, you didn't capitalize on it by selling anywhere in the $30-$50 range. no, instead you held all the way down to the point we're at. never using defi. never even holding your own coins. just an eternal normalfag, convinced you're speshul because you fell for a (((smart)))con a couple years earlier than plebbit

>Ethereum is still not necessarily used by institutions
Neither is link because it doesn't actually do anything. Prove me wrong.

>>55237790
Are you retarded?

>>55237803
>self-custody
I bet this post was written by a guy who paid $100 for self custody device and thinks that he is a hacker man now

>>55237860
No, are you?

>>55231457
>In 2017, we saw the "Ethereum Enterprise Alliance" conference. ETH went from like $5 to $1,000.
Exactly. The EEA was very much the trigger for ETH to explode the way it did.
Everyone knows pic related; ETH holder sold his ETH hoping to swing but then the EEA was announced at a conference and he got permanently priced out.
The part circled in red is where he talks about the EEA announcement.

And the EEA was nothing compared to Chainlink's Swift trial.

>>55237910
That's what a retard would say

>>55237983
GOTTEM LMAO FUDKEKS FUNDAMENTALLY BTFO

>>55231765
I think in addition to >>55231819 the somewhat unique thing about the cryptocurrency industry are the power games that are at play. Consider the motivations of MEV mafia, and how much money is at stake. It's hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars at this stage. This isn't just a couple of nerds skimping off some money. These are highly organized and highly resourced teams doing this. Chainlink releases products and services that are philosophically at odds with the wider crypto industry at large. Chainlink is attempting to clean up the industry by forcing it to grow up from the shitcoin casino games. The elephant in the room is that if Chainlink's products and services win, then Chainlink will have an huge influence over the industry going forward. People tend to not like giving up power, and I think that's why we've noticed for years the strange animosity towards Chainlink from the "big" industry players. They don't want to give up power in an industry that's ripe for the taking.

>>55231457
>he thinks the banks will allow the little guys holding LINK to retire early
In reality the banks will see how effective it is compared to the traditional system then implement it themselves eliminating the use for LINK

This was really the linch pin in putting the fiat "smart" contract fraud into the open for anybody that wants to see to see it. Was it Sergeys incompetency or intention

>>55238088
Checked

>>55231457
test

>>55238005
T: my comprehension is limited to 2 messages at a time

>>55238095
yeah that's why amazon web services are so unsuccesful, all the banks just made their own instead of paying rofl

>>55231457
Thanks for the information, especially about the fudies because obviously they have an interest but never talk about it.
So I have some questions:
1. Do someone knows about the LINK agenda, for exemple is there apointed conference or meeting where institutions or Chainslinks will explain the swift decision.
2. Does Chainlink is related to banking people, I mean, is it the same network of people, invester, so is serguey working for international big finance?
3. Would they choose another technology if another could do the same? Maybe they could already choose another technology?

2 and 3 are to understand if they'll keep choosing chainlink in the future.

>>55238095
>banks will implement their own decentralised network of incentivised oracles and keep all the profit for themselves
This is the state of fud in June 2023, just prior to CCIP release. Almost worth bookmarking for posterity.

>>55234486
I'll start with clarifying that I don't fud, despite understanding that others do and why they do it. That being said, no, there aren't going to be any new and enlightening ideas, besides from anons smart enough to see past the fud anyways. Its a filter like everything on this site, if you get filtered its your own fault.

>>55237295
You're stuck in your own bubble anon. It isn't narcissistic to have a thesis that as crypto gains traction with tradfi, the crypto that allows that to occur stands to gain the most. The issue at hand is chainlink's value prop goes directly against the value prop of the majority of the market (musical chairs), so they're going to inverse each other until one party wins.

>>55238088
Checked and also exactly what I was alluding to in this post
>>55238486
This is a unique situation, the better chainlink does, the worse off the majority of other crypto is, even ETH which stands to gain a lot from increased network activity still has competing interests from things like MEV. Granted crypto as a whole is still competing for people's money anyways, but link stands as a unique threat as it can effectively end the casino paradigm.

>>55238177
Blockchain can't scale and using second off chain layers eleminates the necessity for blockchains, especially when its walled garden crap mixed with proof of jew, excuse me proof of (((stakholder)))

>>55238169
ooohhh he's seething now LMAO COPE

>>55238180
Your first question should've been "where can I learn english" lmao

>>55235980
you heard it here link chuds, any of you that bought link on a "dex" or ever used "binance" will lose everything and go to prison hahahah

>>55238486
>You're stuck in your own bubble anon.
I literally kekked at this.
The total void of self awareness truly leaves me speechless.
You're in a cult that thinks it's about to take over global commerce by owning a token that's been in circulation since 2017 and presently trades at sub $6... what can I even say to someone like you? Look outside your bedroom window? Jesus fucking christ. Just set everything aside for a moment - egos and everything - LINK has fallen from outside the top 5 to outside the top 20 over a 3 year period... don't think for a second the desperation in the cope is not obvious. Every time I post in LINK threads now I feel like I'm talking to fullblown crazy people.

>>55239098
Token not needed.

>>55239098
Can you tell me what SWIFT is and why they're talking about Link all of the sudden? Why is this fat Sir Gay guy on the news?

>>55237061
The btc dumps that perfectly coincide with good Link news? How there has been multiple black swans when Link was about to break major price points (ftx)?
Anon I can lead you to water but you’re the one that has to drink. A very important lesson I learned in this world is that things are not always what they seem and that you have to draw your own conclusions sometimes because TV man and “experts opinion” isn’t always beneficial.

>>55238828
Kek

>>55231529
>>55231574
>>55231607
>mindbroken kekfuddie reduced to angry suicide wishes
You fags were always pretty retarded so I guess it was always gonna end like this for you on here

>>55235185
Why don’t some of you faggots pay someone to do this then? If some losers have 30 hours a week to FUD it’s really not that hard to pay some influencer retard girl or chad to shill it to normies on tik tok or instagoy. Hope you epic pwn teh normies fud fags learned a valuable lesson in karma this last bull run pretending you’re 200 IQ geniuses. Congrats you played yourselves fudding out the exit liquidity.

>>55231574
>Kill yourself baggie
Based

>>55238088
The pricks that do MEV know their time is limited and everybody hates them, which is why you see them moving towards a “more fair” solution eg PBS and fee sharing. We can only hope their window closes sooner rather than later.

T knower

I have a feeling that the SEC will halt crypto transactions for US citizens or even make possession of crypto illegal right before chainlink and other cryptos take off.
It's clear that the big guys don't want the little guy to make it and astroturf this side with extremely inorganic fud.
A few months ago I saw a glowie pro-biden meme posted literally laying out the plan: upholding the dollar and traping the little wagie guy in crypto and meme coins until he gives up or kills himself.
This is a financial world war (dollar sphere vs bric sphere) and also a US internal class war (oppressive institutions vs little guy who wants to make it) with hints of a looming ethnic strife (jews in power vs goyim wagies).

>>55237437
how so? FSS would kill their business

>>55239275
ah yes, if only the normie retail low figure late coming retail link bagholders had held, the market would have been different

>>55232721'
>what do you mean you aren't invested and shilling for globohomo?
Chainlink is a globohomo shitcoin of the highest order. Both twitter and this board has been infested with paid shills and bagholders 24/7 for years now.

But yeah as soon as these slimy homos get a little bit of pushback, they cry in pain as their globohomo agendas are exposed.

>This is a serious, once in every ten years

FUD, link is a once in a millennium investment

>>55237803
>everyone in the know in crypto moving towards oracleless designs
no one cares for your scams mevfag

>>55239347
They killed their own grift. Eth is dying and nothing can stop it. When the sec drops the knife on the eth foundation it's going to be ugly

>>55239098

> Take over global commerce

It doesn't take shit over, it just enables existing institutions to shave billions (trillions?) off their existing infrastructure costs.

>>55237829
> Prove me wrong.
Your ID already did

>>55232608
don't be too sure anon the fact that ETH is making some good moves, won't make others so retard, as crypto payments is fast becoming an alternative solution across various industries now and xPortalApp transactions are safe, secured & private from the outside world

>>55239347
how do i become a knower?

>>55231457
>In 2023, we have SWIFT and 12+ major financial institutions (likely many more), announcing that they are using Chainlink. More than that, they are actually going to need to USE chainlink, where as the EEA was just about furthering development on Ethereum.
right, price is not pumping because there are not LRC-20 coins. you need scam coins built on top of LINK to pump the price of LINK

>>55233323
So youre worried about thebquakity of mind holding link with you because they think someone could have incentive to cause anons to part with their stack and make an organized effort to achieve that and not because they obsessively post about cuckolding and black men day in and day out for hours every day? Now im starting to doubt the minds of OG linkies. (Perhaps this was your plan all along though)

>>55240880
>you need scam coins built on top of LINK
kek but banks building on top of Link doesn't count? The fuck outta here.

>>55231457
Token not needed

>>55231457
Serious question bros. I have a couple alts that I’m down badly on but they’re probably <8% of my portfolio. I know if hold id break even at the bullrun and maybe some profit. But there is so much bullish sentiment around LINK despite the market conditions right now.

Worth to eat the losses on those bad alts (rose, ens, utk, kyber, and some more) to consolidate? I don’t see another project being this dominant for the considerable future. If you want to know I’m heavy on BTC/ETH/LINK but do have other big players like ADA, XRP, and XMR. Surprisingly I’ve never lost money on Cardano or XRP ever. Can some one please chime in, thank you in advance bros.

>>55241158
Read the OP and realize that Link is currently at 3 billion market cap.
3 BILLION.
Go ahead and look at every other coin above Link and look at their marketcap and think to yourself, "is Link undervalued?"

>>55240897
I had a long in depth reply for you but the gay spam filter wouldnt let me post it no matter how many changes i did.

Long story short I am helping marines embark on a symbolic heroes journey.
The old marines were cocky and arrogant and this energy must be corrected to pure humility, I believe only then will they be able to make it.
Thus i must painstakingly carry out the necessary function of le evil fudder

>>55241794
Ive been holding for 6 years I think I've earned it now my dude.
don't make it harder please

>>55231457
I bought a 1040 more link this week.
There's nothing else that's even close.

>>55238503
Chainlink has consistently said they want the whole industry to succeed

>>55231596
>TradFi (SWIFT
and you think they will use public blockchains like ethereum that gets congested with a simple dapp game? if not then why would they even need oracles if they're gonna use their private blockchains, why even use a blockchain in the first place then, tokens will probably never be actually needed, I'm still holding, but next time it's at $50 I'm selling at least half and give no fucks about muh future potential, because shit gets priced in faster than people can blink

>>55243062

you don't seem to know a thing about what Chainlink does

Link owners will make it
You can fud but you can’t hide
Don’t make it hard for yourself
81k

>>55243074
that's exactly the answer I expected, no one ever addresses the elephant in the room that truly decentralized blockchains that are secure simply don't scale, that's why after 14 years the only use case for blockchain is digital money/gold so basicly bitcoin, everything else is a pie in the sky idea that somehow can't come to fruition

>>55243062
>why even use a blockchain in the first place
Because pic related

>you don't need oracles for private chains!
fucking lol

>>55231457
Link has spent over a year at $5-8. ive never seen that even in the bear markets. eth sat at about $10 for like 10 months but link is already far past that. I cant even see what future link has. Why is it in some werid flat chart for so long. Cant even figure out what its got in store.

>>55243096

buddy - banks are going to run their own private chain. Chainlink will allow those banks to interact with other bank's private chains. That's why we're bullish on Chainlink - amongst the dozens of other things that chainlink does.

>>55242099
Chainlink wants to keep its grift, chainlink is going to end like all of eth devs, foundations, promoters and the total of ponzi peddlers, behind bars, in a ditch or on the run for the rest of their lives

>>55243096
>matthew kratter enters the chat

>>55243156
>Chainlink will allow those banks to interact with other bank's private chains
and how is that different from the current systems that are in use
>dude the banks will use it privately lol
and I laughed at xrp schizos

>>55243137
because after the EEA announcement all kinds of figures from all kinds of spheres threw their money on ethereum. also hear say existed, people bought after coming home getting shilled on dev meetups

also none of the semi rich guys with some risk appetite touch link they just dont

>>55243178
>and how is that different from the current systems that are in use
current systems do not allow banks to interact with other banks' private chains
>and I laughed at xrp schizos
irrelevant

>>55231457
>oldfag
>2017
lol

>>55244127
nobody cares that you wasted your life here bro

>>55244127
2017 was 6 years ago my man
Kind of a long time ago in 2023

>>55244132
I only check in once in a while. Most of the time the crypto news takes over and the S/N ratio is just too low. But if there's big news about a rug I come here to lol. I also mock the GME idiots as well. Of course they probably overlap a lot.

Proper TA is indicating huge downside for chainlink (3-4$) range.
Shill me link after that happens

>>55242099
checked and they do, the issue is that while chainlink can bring a rising tide and lift all ships, the current grifters who own the markets make larger profit margins. They prefer being big fish in a small pond, rather than small fish in an ocean, which is what they'd be if link actually brings tradfi on board.

Some of it is small minded thinking and pettiness, but there is some merit as well, again if you are an eth grifter you make guaranteed profit on everything in the current system. You bring tradfi in and legitimize the space, you're looking at maybe slow steady gains, but gone are the days of 10x-100x.

>>55244170
TA has never properly predicted this market. TA didn't call link's breakout in 2019, and it sure as shit didn't see the May fallout in 2021 (even if it was obvious in hindsight with Elon on SNL). The only thing TA does is tell you what the trend is, which is down, no shit sherlock, but you're going to miss when it reverses, and TA is going to hold you out.

>>55237058
This is nothing like xrp chainlink has actual partnerships with actual working products

>>55244232
>Elon on SNL
you can point to that single event as a prime example of why the crypto market is total bullshit.
Doge was at 70 fucking cents all because a bunch of absolute knuckle dragging retards thought he was going to go on SNL and say some magical spell that would make the price go up 10x
It just goes to show how stupid the people in this space are, and when you're holding something legit like Link that's tied to this clown market, you have to know that the price action is going to be frustrating to say the least.

You can't really understate the damage that these memestocks have done to the legitimate projects in the crypto space.
It's going to take something like CCIP being an extremely trustworthy way for financial institutions to interact with blockchain technology.
If we see another big memestock run any time soon, you might as well write off the next 5 years.

>>55245157
people are too poor and jaded to do any more nonsense bullruns of doggie coins

>>55245557
lol you wish. dogecoin is still a safer bet than LINK

>>55245157
Link will make it back to $50 within 5 years wagmi

>>55232149
I was there. ETH was $15 on February 28, 2017. That was the date when the EEA was officially unveiled. Correct me with proof if you think I'm wrong.

>>55245901
A

>>55245871
I

>>55245772
D

>>55245557
S

>>55246000
chkt

>>55241189
The real red pill is that EVERYTHING else is overvalued.

Cope link shills. Satoshi was a master of game theory. The elites cant do shit against it or stop it. So instead they made a bunch of shitcoins to distract people from bitcoin and paid dev trannies to slow down its scaling.

Have fun with your link "gains" when you sell for 1k digital cbdc bucks and have your chainlink powered smart contracts automatically tax you at 99%. Since in the glorious post 4IR world, private property will be abolished when the new smart englightened policities are in place.

>congratulations global citizen #66600003736252, for your benevolent charity in helping the globohomo control grid chainlink recieve its starter funding. Thanks to your exemplary service to the WEF and for fighting for our cause, we have awarded you with twice the normal ration of smart cricket protein substitute, along with a full hour of extra outdoor time!

>>55246134
Stop using communist propaganda style posters, it completely destroys your message.