/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55240806
Sergey's background is unprecedented.

>>55240806

There were fudders in the live chat and they all disappeared when sergey said the token is needed lol

OH MY FUCKING GOD A BREADCRUMB!!!

>>55240850

This is a lot more than breadcrumbs at this point, my fuddie friend

>>55240848
>Creator of the token says "token is needed"
<Le Bagholders

>>55240868
Surely the price must have soared this morning upon this news
*checks price*
Wow $6.01!!!!!

token not needed

>>55240876
kek link holders gotta be the most delusional in this space

>>55240806
He's really spoon feeding the masses here. The 30 people that watch this are finally going to get it.

Token not needed

> Sergey explains exactly why it's needed, even though it's already in the Github and whitepaper why it's needed
> The Fudcucks, completely out of options, continue to claim that token is not needed in the hopes that like 10 retard retail "traders" won't buy

What exactly are you trying to slow down here with this behavior and what incentivizes you to do so

>>55240922
>>55240997
>bro just pay neets to query info from yahoo finance

Link where, OP?

>>55241047

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqooR3wdQiQ

When moon?

>>55240806
>so Sergey is see the gene therapy to grow a human buttocks on your forehead is progressing nicely
>how will this effect the token price?
>Also what is your thoughts on neet nodes?

>>55240997
It's like shooting fish in a barrel at this point. Wow, the creator of a token said it's needed. No way is he in any way biased in saying that lmao. Seriously, you nerds make so many threads picking apart and congratulating the never ending rabbit hole of "breadcrumbs", as if this war against FUD is some existential threat which lives in your fight or flight mechanisms rent free. No one gives a shit. Go touch grass.

>>55240806
does he ever bother to change shirts?

>>55241095

>>55240806
>TOKEN NEEDED
nowhere in the interview does he say this. Mental illness.

>>55241064
>Sergey Nagararazov welcome back

KEK

Who is this obese gentleman

New bitcoin

>>55240806
he looks dead inside. in addition to fat outside, but what else is new

>>55241064
ccip always sounds like cum cum in pussy

>>55241064
The painting on the wall is an abstract pink wojak

>>55240997
Pure logic:
Axiom 1: the token is needed
Axiom 2: the usage of the network has only been growing with more partnerships and integrations

If you accept both of these axioms, then you must also accept that the price should be growing, because there is an increase in usage and demand for the token which is needed to recieve services.
What we know for sure:
The price has not gone up despite the growing usage
Axiom 2 can be proven by chainlinks own statistics and graphs directly.
Which can only leave us to conclude that axiom 1 is the problem.
Axiom 1: the token is needed - Must be incorrect

>>55240806
(1) an investment of money, (2) in a common enterprise, (3) with the expectation of profit, or (4) to be derived from the efforts of others.

any ID on the painting behind him?

Time stamp where he talks about the token?

>>55241250

Interviewer: Talk a little bit about the role that the token, LINK, plays in this ecosystem - how does it participate,
what are the tokenomics, what is the functionality with regards to the new types of structures that you guys
are in the process of rolling out right now?

Sergey: The economics and the token economics really can be defined in Chainlink Tokenomics 2.0... basically it hinges on people paying user fees in order to create greater degrees of security as greater amounts of value are secured within the system. so basically as the value secured within the system rises, the need to pay larger and larger user fees should grow because people will be willing to pay for greater degrees of security to guarantee the security of their applications, whether it's defi market data, gaming applications, other financial applications. Basically, user fees should grow with the value secured because people need more security to secure greater amounts of value.

It's all in the whitepaper, Fudcuck.

>>55241437

32:16

My brain cannot comprehend why price isn't moving after this

>>55241469
Thanks

>>55241064
https://www.youtube.com/live/eqooR3wdQiQ?feature=share&t=342 timestamped lads

>>55241541
t=346
>sare gay nagarazov
lmao

>>55241482
Because Obongo is a faggot.

>new news on ccip
>but first lets take a look at the price action
this is gonna be good

>it's not called chain link by accident
we are so back

>>55241482
He laid it out in the video. It isn't happening today or next week. This will take years. He knows it's a long game to tiptoe around Gary

>>55241064
Thank you, anon.

>>55241064
>>55241541
KEK SAVAGE
Starts the show by showing the price of The Chainlink token.
My sides in orbit.

>>55240806
>>55240848
>>55241064
>>55240997
I am not bullish, I am beyond bearish.

Chainlink is a globohomo shitcoin of the highest order and is going straight to zero.
Your days of shitting up biz with your astroturfed psyops are over. You've been found guilty of using DARPA bots, paid shills and sybil attacks to push the WEF agendas, and for that you will pay with your miserable life.
You shills and bagholders will be financially EXTERMINATED and there is nothing you can do about it except watch in horror as it all comes tumbling down. The ride ends here for you linkies, the game is over.

>>55242086
>hypnotize minds on the guy on the lefts shirt
The HEXagon sure is working

>and the 3rd and final thing
>it’s all gonna be one thing

>>55241377
Nigger tier logician. The only thing you managed to prove is that you don't understand what an axiom is.

>>55240806
Cock

>9:25
>it's not called chainlink by accident
b-but i thought the idea of linking all chains was introduced in whitepaper 2.0. how could he have known about this when he named it in 2017?

>>55242416
SN=SN

>>55242238
An axiom is a basis point you presuppose to be true in order to carry out your argument.
So please go ahead and explain how the needed token doesnt go up in price with a 10x increase in demand

My cock is enlarged

>>55240868
Its a whole ass loaf of bread at this point

>>55241377
Axioms 1 and 2 seem to be correct. I feel like it's just a problem of the team constantly dumping their coins or giving out coins to their partners to dump.

>>55242732
Basically the team doesn't care about you. You are nothing to them. Just crypto degens. The scum of the earth. Exit liquidity.

>>55242647
>An axiom is a basis point you presuppose to be true in order to carry out your argument.
lol no. An axiom is accepted to be true.
>explain how the needed token
kek, poo nigger.

>>55242868
>accepted
>presupposed
same thing but the connotation is that axioms have been examined more closely

>>55240877
>ser

>>55240806
I wish he didn't look so goofy.

>>55242647
They haven’t started charging their users fees yet you absolute retard. They are still bootstrapping the network which means demand can go up 100x but their users aren’t paying to use the network yet. Why is this so hard to understand?

Just bought more.

>>55241377
>then you must also accept that the price should be growing
Correlation fallacy. Logic failure.

>>55242868
>Any axiom is a statement that serves as a starting point from which other statements are logically derived. Whether it is meaningful (and, if so, what it means) for an axiom to be "true" is a subject of debate in the philosophy of mathematics. - wikipedia
Yes it is accepted to be true for the purpose of the argument and serves as a premise for the reasoning.
I use it as the starting point, and at the end of the argument i show how these axioms cannot both be true given the conclusion.
Im literally showing how the token being needed cannot actually be used as an axiom, im showing how the shills argument collapses in on itself because these are YOUR axioms that YOU take to be true.

>>55243407
Wow you just debunked supply and demand! better let the whole economic world know your discovery

>>55241482
Really? After all the lawsuits and SEC crackdowns and FUD in the news? How does your brain remember to breathe?

Give it to me straight anons, should I go 50% LINK and 50% BTC with $200k?

>>55242158
Time stamp for this?

lol @ the end
sergey was not amused by this smug dude's pointless quip about how 256 bit encryption is technically not 100% deterministic because someone could theoretically crack it.

Then the host ended it without even really thanking Sergey and just launched into shillling his show or whatever. I have a feeling serger won't be appearing on his show again

>>55243800
It made me feel for Sergey at the end. He's getting sick of explaining so much to people who understand so little. Like casting pearls before swine.

Its okay Sergey. we understand.

>>55243521
I dunno man, usually diversification is a meme but with that much I would maybe spread yourself out a little more. I assume you have other investments, though. For sure grab a link make it stack.

>>55243800
Checked>>55243990
To be fair, while he has been explaining this shit to midwit normie hosts for a few years that wont be changing anytime soon, unless he shifts Kamal into the limelight. Not a suggestion by any means. I appreciate any serg appearance.

>>55240848
S.W.I.F.T.L.Y. regulated. Oracle needed afterall LMAO it's our time LINKIES

>>55244045
I just enjoy seeing him genuinely enjoy himself. Which is has been absent lately with all of these interviews. Especially when he notices people zoning out mid convo.

>>55240847
https://youtu.be/zMrfJgyTf68?t=11

>>55244045
Karmel hates the coconut. Not gonna happen.

>Sargee Naga
>Na ga
>Not going to make it anyhow amirite fud chat?
holy based dAPPing on that fat russian scammer

Tell me about this token Sargee is it needed?

>The token is important to our ecosystem
>The token secures 7 trillions in value

>but the price is only 6 dollars isnt that correct?

>*heavy breathing noises* we hope the crypto speculators would look at the price of the token and the recent news that has no been priced in and put two and two together and pick up a bag or two

>>55241460
>SWIFT needs to secure several trillions dollars
>"THAT MEANS SWIFT WILL SPEND TRILLIONS PUMPING OUR BAGS AND BANKRUPT THEMSELVES!"
The value of LINK's mcap is always only going to be a tiny percentage of the value it secures. With its mcap already being in the billions, its room for growth is limited. If anything, LINK is overvalued right now due to cuckold cultists who refuse to take the L and sell

>>55242020

>Sergey Narararanov

My little Crypto CEO can't be this fat!

Listening to this fat russian scammer struggle to convince the host of a crypto scam jewtube channel that banks are bullish on digital assets is sending my sides into orbit
>but but hong kong king kong ummm many participants *might* get interested as soon as we can get an appointment over the phone

>we love our yearly cons
>we plan to con the public again this year
LMAO

>>55241377
Back to high school geometry, fuddy.

>>55245180
>5 pbtid