/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55224602
Jason Parser killed LINK

>>55224620
Jason Parser is dead bro, we Tom Lee now

>>55224602
Let's see how the pseudo-fudsters try to spin this one.

>>55224602
You do know link fudders are holders right?

>>55224602
how do you guys manage to dump SO HARD and pump SO LITTLE oh I know incel sexual impotence is a epidemic between the bagholders of this garbage coin

One more mean reply and I buy a chainlink. Any takers?

>>55224602
Organic or not, that’s irrelevant. Link has had shit price action so far and it’s Sergfaggot’s fault for not destroying fudders

>>55224659
chainlink is poopy stinky fartballs

>>55224679
He can’t he’s not trying to get raped by SEC

>>55224701
Nigger. Im OP just on cellular now

it's just people making fun of those who still post about it.
contain your alt spam in a general and the "fud" disappears, because everyone will simply go back to forgetting link ever existed, like everyone who isn't on biz has already done.

>>55224736
the fud already finished a few days ago. both sides agreed.

>>55224756
there never was any fud to begin with, just spam with typical "breadcrumb" cope on on side and link usd/btc/eth charts on the other.

all meaningless, nobody new bought any link, bagholders kept holding it on the way down, nothing changed.
relegate it to a general and nobody will give it a second thought.

>>55224882
I literally bought a link in this thread fudcuck

>>55224632
Check the monthly chart

>>55224937
Whoa! Looks like LINK is way up. Nice.

>>55224900
nobody *new* is buying link from these cope posts, you've been bagholding it down from $50.

AAHHHHHGGGGG this FUD is too intense

*BATTLE MUSIC COMMENCES*

I choose you Chainlinkgod!

Pokëball GOOOOOOOO!

>>55224602
It's a combination of eth mods that know the implications of link on their grift and a discord cabal of already largely pink wearing former progr.. fascist streaming grifters

>>55224756
This. The FUD is over, it's mooning time now.

FUD is over

As a fudder, I know its organic. And its bearish. It totally blows away the whole narrative that elites and glow agents are fudding your super secret insider bags. Being a fudder gives such a perspective that you have so much alpha which is completely unavailable to the average baggie cultist.

>>55225706
Post stomach with a timestamp

>>55224638
don't forget the baggies who are convinced the price is being suppressed LMAO at the cope

>>55225764
If you post sharpie in pooper first then I will

>>55224638
>>55224639
>>55224679
>>55224736
>>55224882
>>55224937
>>55224963
>>55225077
>>55225706
>>55225903
>umm sorry sweaty but this is organic behavior
whatever you say, shareblue fud cucks
*buys 100 more linkies*

>>55224620
And nobody said a word

it's fun watching baggies trying to cope saying the most ridic things pretending that they are super cool with everything kekekekekekekekekekekekekekekekekek mucho mega kekekekekekekekekekekekekekekekekekekek

>>55224602
No there isn't.

But I still don't know the endgame here. It seems like there is a fud link squad and a shill link squad and its likely they're the same squad.

Is the idea to funnel buys into link to keep us away from crypto which hasn't pumped yet or away from btc, or is the idea to fud link so that we sell and these goons scoop before it moons and rob us of gains. Or is the idea to just pollute the board with pointless garbage to prevent any other discussion.

I sold years ago so I don't really have anything to gain or lose from this but the entire situation absolutely glows and always did.

>>55226219
>0.01 link has been deposited into your account for combating chainlink misinformation online

>>55226347

It’s like someone bottled piss and is selling it as “chainlink”. Meanwhile, the token is busy digging its own grave. So go ahead, keep sipping on that Chainlink lemonade

>>55224602
5 cuck threads right now

I fud link every day and buy link every week. I won't stop until I have a suicide stack (10000 LINK) or LINK is above $100 bucks

>>55226893
good morning sirs
why are all linkfaggots posting from phones and tablets? are they all too poor to afford a real computer?

LINK is in the same spot as GME now, the only difference being that the former is talked about here more often, so that's why you see more fud as well. i wouldn't really call it fud anyway, it's just kicking a dead horse at this point

>>55227112
GME is a brand whose actual activities have been dying for a very long time now, and the only reason the stock got hyped was purely because of market conditions.
Chainlink's activities on the other hand have blown up in the past two years, and are set to absolutely explode into mainstream finance.

In short, you're retarded.

>>55224602
lmao look at this shit man wtf are you talking about

>>55226347
>Or is the idea to just pollute the board with pointless garbage to prevent any other discussion.
It is this one

>>55227116
>Chainlink is a brand whose actual activities have been dying for a very long time now, and the only reason the token got hyped was purely because of market conditions.
you switched the words up, be more careful next time

>>55227132
Nearly all of crypto runs on Chainlink at this point.
Even Maker officially came out as Chainlink users recently, after years of being covert Chainlink users.

>>55227147
>Nearly all of the short interest concentrates on GME at this point.
you should really get that checked out, you are mixing up the bagholder fantasies

>>55227233
"Short interest" is market conditions, like I said.

>>55227255
so the only reason the token got hyped was purely because of market conditions? you already said that, after i fixed your mistake. glad we can agree on this

>>55227433
>so the only reason the token got hyped was purely because of market conditions?
No, that's the reason GME got hyped.

Learn more reading comprehension.

>>55227438
>Learn more reading comprehension.
you don't have to feel ashamed about mixing up the talking points of these two bagholder clubs, they are almost identical as you learned

>>55227468
All you have to do is read >>55227116
Zero mix-up possible.

All GME has is market conditions, their actual business has been dying for a very long time.
The actual business end for Chainlink on the other hand has been booming, and is showing the most concrete promise in all of crypto history.

>>55227560
>has been booming
if that's true, let's check the price really quick. weird, it's down over 90%, how is that possible? looks eerily similar to failed businesses like GME. did you mix up the two again?

>>55224602
It's over bros, Chainlink has now entered bear market. The markets will recover and go up forever while Chainlink slowly slides into oblivion. The Great Reset is cancelled, linkies will not inherit the world and we won't be their slaves. Ii-i-it's over for linkies.. they can never win.

Oh look what the cat dragged in last night heh

They fuddies think that
>buys 100 more link
is ironic

Kek

>>55227581
The price doesn't change what happened in terms of Chainlink adoption and use.

>>55227613
desperate to average down that badly?

>>55227636
so if adoption and use has no effect on the price, why would anyone buy it?

>>55227687
Why did anyone buy Bitcoin or Ethereum?
Their adoption and use has no direct bearing on price either, and often has a completely opposite effect.

>>55224602
must be the bulgarians

>>55227644
I'm actually bumping my average, all things considered.

>>55227817
>often has a completely opposite effect
so let's compare the price of eth/btc with link to see if there is any merit to that statement. what is that? link performs much worse than them? seems like you were wrong

>>55224602
It’s just that so many people dislike the American government that they want to see it fail. Link is in bed with the government now. I understand why that’s a problem for some people and I won’t judge them for their aggression.

>>55228027
Whenever an L1 (BTC, ETH, ...) dumps, its usage skyrockets.
Whenver an L1 (BTC, ETH, ...) pumps, its largely because of trading on CEXes, whereby not a single coin is moved on-chain.

Usage has no bearing on price, and often has the completely opposite effect by design.

>>55228038
>Usage has no bearing on price, and often has the completely opposite effect by design.
>Whenever an L1 (BTC, ETH, ...) dumps, its usage skyrockets.
so you just mixed up cause and effect? i see why you are invested in trash, basic logic eludes you

>>55228187
How am I mixing up cause and effect?
You're claiming usage causes prices to pump, but that definitely does not happen whenever L1 transaction fees spike during massive dumps.

Chainlink fud is now OVER

Chainlink FUDs itself with it's abysmal price performance.

If the token actually pumped nobody would laugh at it and people would buy it like Bitcoin or Ethereum

there is no such thing as a trustless oracle

>>55228303
>If the token actually pumped nobody would laugh at it
Oh boy, you clearly weren't here in 2018-19-20

>>55228333
Just like there's no trustless bitcoin node.
checked

>>55228229
>You're claiming usage causes prices to pump
no. i asked you why anyone should buy link when adoption and use has no effect on price, i.e. every partnership and use case is meaningless for the price. you answered with btc/eth whataboutism.
>How am I mixing up cause and effect?
you claim increased usage of btc/eth has the opposite effect on price. you reason that is because after the price has fallen, usage goes up. i reason that you are retarded because your statements are nonsensical

>>55227636
In the future, the space will see broader acceptance, Pajeet. BrillionFi is addressing the critical crypto issue of wallet and asset management, even curry eaters might join the space at some point.

>>55228379
>no.
Yes.

chain-kink

>>55228346
I've been here since 2017.

The "FUD" back then was mostly baggies trying to gatekeep normies and redditors out of Link. Now everybody mocks Chainlink because it had one of the shittiest price performances in the top 20.

I'm sorry for you if you fell for the Link meme

>>55228450
The fud back then was just as braindead and spammy as today.

>>55228394
after some probing questions, you came to the same conclusion everyone outside the filter bubble did: supposed "success" of chainlink does nothing for the token price. guiding you down this path was hard work, but i think i did a good job, you finally understand. but there is still a lot of work to do, your embarrassing mix up of cause and effect did not go unnoticed, you really need to work on this if you want others to take you seriously

Link fudders are very cringe ngl

>>55228485
My point in this discussion was that Chainlink is nothing like GME.
GME's business has been tanking and has zero prospects, and the exact opposite is true for Chainlink.

>>55228500
not sure your point comes across as believable, seeing as you are struggling with basic concepts like the chain of causality. it's probably best if you switch ids. you should not feel embarrassed by this, i think you made a good effort today

>>55228546
>not sure your point comes across as believable
It's objective fact.

>>55228485
>>55228546
Seethe

>>55224602
It's as organic as it can be. Most people who were all in LINK experienced a HUGE opportunity cost holding it in 2021 (literal garbage was doing at least 20-50x that year). Then continued to hold it because it was a "bear market coin", got disappointed again. And even relative to most random top 100 coins it underperformed both against BTC and ETH (in both bull and bear). The chart looks terrible and if the market doesn't like it I don't like it. Stop marrying your shitcoins. Or at least know when you should get a divorce. At this point it's better to have "faith" and "conviction" in HarryPotterO*amaSonic10Inu than Chainlink unironically

>>55228616
see >>55228474

>>55228630
How does any of that make my post less true?

>>55228645
The fud was exactly the same back when Link was booming.
Saying the fud today is because of Link floundering is retarded.

>>55226956
Does this affect the fact that they are seeking Lambo?
I lost my Links to hackers and respectfully retired from Link. Wallets with self custody, self sovereignty, and privacy features will be great for oldfags like myself.

>>55224727
What app is that? I want my purchases to be fun

>>55228773
Kraken. Though I’ll admit I might move all my shit off with Gary going guns blazing recently.

>>55228656
thanks based CLG for setting the record straight

>>55224602
i am doing it organically
at this point all the info is there to read for anyone who does 10 minutes of due diligence, at least back in 2018/19 it was all speculative, but now there is no doubt at all anymore
and i simply dont want newfags buying in at these prices, thankfully most newfags are dumb lazy and emotional so playing to those sides will stop them from buying as they are indeed to lazy to do 10 minutes of due diligence

but but but you are fudding and tanking your own investment: no and no
at this point newfag money isnt enough anymore to move the market and having esily prone panic sellers in early is just incentive for the MM to flashcrash it even more, let the masses buy in at the top where they belong
and dont doubt for a minute they will hesitate to do so, when line go up norman buys even after a parabola is flattening out see summer of defi lol

>>55229604
KEK pathetic baggie lowering his investment for free

>>55229713
yes and thank you for aiding me also free of my charge

>>55228229
Ethereum price went up massively during the nft craze. Because ETH is needed to buy and interact with nfts.

Meanwhile link has only gone down despite its integrations, partnerships and uses going up. Therefore its safe to reason that its usage is not related to its token price. Increased usage does not result in increased demand for the token. Token not needed

>>55230724
ETH is literally the only thing worth DCA'ing and hodling IMO. it's the only crypto where you didn't have to get in massively early and make a total profit off of like me. BTC is a joke in comparison. it can't scale like ETH plus if your goal is to own 1 BTC you're literally just chasing the money and when you finally make it, it's likely it'll dump and you'll have to wait another decade to catch up again