/biz/ - Business & Finance

not posting in the gay nigger thread

>Fed, yes?
Yeah, can you take us to SPY 430 at oh lets say the 9th.
>Oh we're totally tightening again
Really? That's great.
>I said we are totally tightening.
SPY at 430? Perfect. See you there.

Remember all the overexcited anons who said the US government was going to default on its debt?

I'm 12 and what is this?

>>55160048
Total annihilation.

Me after I gambled all my money on alibaba and cant afford food for mittens

>>55159980
>muh AI pumperino
>this time it’s different
>5 year record Put/Call ratio for $QQQ
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, WILL YOU HEED IT? I AM SHORTING QQQ THIS MORNING. THE CYCLES ARE ALIGNING, WALL STREET KIKES HAVE SET THE TRAP FOR RETAIL GOYIM WHO WILL ONCE AGAIN BE THE EXIT LIQUIDITY FOR THE BIG BOY. NVDA BAGGIES WILL ROLL IN THEIR GRAVES FOR ETERNITY. BY JUPITER! COIN WILL BE DELIVER INTO MY VAULTS. WHEN I PRESENT MY LARGE THROBBING BOBO VESSEL TO CHEEKS, YOU WILL OBEY.

>>55160067
one of the things to learn in retrospect is that the massive walls of puts all the way up to where we are now was near-term bullish because it meant there were big institutions trying to milk the cow for every drop they could get while buying enormous downside protection at obscenely high prices. the rally ytd was in fact not a tech trade but a bet that banks had enough cash to secure puts to keep the market from falling for a while

Give me strength bobomaniacs

Both breads are terminally infected

>>55160094
This makes no fucking sense. You are baiting me into calling you the n-word and getting banned again. Fuck you.

>>55160048
Inflation is trans. Itory.

>>55160067
Looks like a squeeze is coming

>>55160062
Should've gambled on YY instead.

>Taylor swift got brain damage

I feel sorry for that guy who keeps posting her all the time in smg, kek

Tell option anons is there any difference to the dealer (ie lose more/less money) when more calls are itm at expiry vs puts.

IE: seems there is a theory that if the p/c ratio is higher more puts would be otm at expiry. And vice versa, because sellers would lose their premium and dealer would not collect their cut? But now that we are getting bullish seems like the market is still going up? So it sorta invalidates max pain?

I'm all stocked up on physical uranium

>>55160067
>>55160282
Looks like I'll have to (you) myself here. Because according to my theory and anon who said
>>55160219
You'd think dealers will pinch put buyers. But yet looking a top 7 stock, ie AAPL, who's p/c, you could just be like "you bought calls" anon and buy otm calls for the past 6 months and make a killing. Seems too easy, right?

>>55159980
All the finance gurus are telling me divvy stocks are a bad investment, am I the one that's wrong or is everyone spouting boomer tier crap?
>You don't need passive income t. Dave Ramsey

>>55160297
JEPI is the answer

Do I just keep buying tech calls?

>>55160297
>>55160304
You are wrong. Dividend stocks are for high net worth inviduaks who have accumulated a nice nest egg and are seeking to live off it. If you’re young and haven’t made it yet. Riskier growth stocks are a better choice. JEPI is not the answer, but it will be for when you cash out your 401k/Roth and want to live off the dividends. It better to cash in larger gains while you’re young then transition into dividends when you’re older and richer.

>>55160291
Solid first step but you'll be locked out of the juiciest gains unless you can secure enrichment.

>>55160318
Honestly at this point I'd say we're pretty close to the part where you just start selling naked tech calls instead.

>>55160318
When did you start?

>>55160329
As far as I can tell dividend reinvestment is basically compound interest? So as long as I don't spend any of it and I use the divvies to buy more stonk which pays more divvies etc then this should just become a snowball, right?

>>55160334
Couple of months ago

>>55160341
Yeah but it'll take years and if you bet on a bunch if stupid shit instead you could win the lottery... or lose consistently like I have been for the last 2 years. Remember dividends are for suckers bug bets is how you make enough money to someday lose your virginity.

>>55160423
What have you lost on so I know what to avoid?

>>55160250
>Taylor swift got brain damage
did not happen

>>55160443
In no particular order: xsp, intc, weat, various miners, cgw, tmf, tqqq, soxl. Some like xsp I lost in multiple trades.

>>55160488
Upon further review, looks like I got heemed by aapl at some point.

Are you winning /smg/

>>55160591
No and it's very irritating.

>>55160505
Wtf has gone wrong with this world

Is that it? Just vote through the deal and get it over with? Credit rating slashed? Issuing of new bonds and drain liquidity from the stock market? Biden's conditions? Is there well and truly no repercussion to raising the debt by additional 5T?
Well, I guess not. Too much money has been printed out. But I do find it funny that the debt has been re-financed from a 1% to 5% rate. They're gonna have to QE again, right? Figg I hate this complex bs.
I love the fact that /smg/ thought the debt ceiling was already priced in but now we're giga pumping again

>>55160282
Market makers lose money only when they hedge incorrectly. Ideally they never lose money despite any directional movement, but they get it wrong occasionally.

If they tend to lose more money on downward movements it's only because they are long biased

>Ackman said in a lengthy tweet that Dimon is a political centrist who is pro-business and pro-free enterprise, while also supportive of "well-designed social programs and rational tax policies that can help the less fortunate." Ackman also said he thinks Dimon, 67, could beat President Joe Biden in a primary or Donald Trump in a general election. He added that Dimon's ability to raise billions of dollars from bipartisan supporters would easily fund his campaign. In a Bloomberg Television interview on Wednesday, Dimon said that he had mulled joining public office. "I love my country, and maybe one day I'll serve my country in one capacity or another," he said.

I support Ackman and Dimon.

>>55160682
>loses election
ACK!

>>55160642
I've seen her feet

>>55160488
I doubled my money on TQQQ lmao. But yeah none of those pay dividends and I'm looking for something more reliable to support me rather than gamble for fun (although I do with a few bucks on occasion).

>diet soda and those little rollups that are prosciutto wrapped around mozzarella are sold out everywhere

>>55160682
>the less fortunate
What does this even mean when none of these policies ever seem to help? Do they mean only black sheboons without a job?

>stocks

>>55160591
I'm making money but no amount of money I can make will buy me a loli gfdaughterwife

>>55160775
Or a shota bfsonhusband

What's the point