/biz/ - Business & Finance

https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Billionaire-Mining-Investor-Says-Copper-Price-Plunge-Wont-Last.html

Might be the bottom in copper lads

Dead weekend made me check in on /pmg/ for nearly the first time since the split.

What a shithole that place has become

>>55111691
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/faraday-copper-tse-fdy-spend-114104649.html

They needed a place to geek out and they're comfy being ultratards

>>55111611
low energy bake

>>55112240
Low energy? Bullish for oil & gas

Last
>>55032283
Lazy O.P.

>>55112645
I'm not lazy
I just don't give a fuck

How's everybody's weekend going? I've been taking it easy and reading some manga. Summer holiday starts tomorrow so I've got a good month to kick back and do whatever I want, whenever I want. Hoping for some hot sunny days so I can go sunbathing out on the grass

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/PHX.TO?p=PHX.TO&ncid=yahooproperties_peoplealso_km0o32z3jzm

This company is on my fracking radar and paid out like 10% divvy last year. Any big brains wanna go over their financials and memelines for me pl0x?
I'm starting to like the tubing providers for the refracking. Refracking is coming. It's the way of recovering the lost millions down hole from using IBS sand

>>55113781

I was wondering where cmmg was and was going to make another cat lady edition if it was not up already.

Fun drone footage of mine

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFBhwapMD-8

>>55114080
Yt pepo don't seezin dey roggs

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ESN.TO?p=ESN.TO&ncid=yahooproperties_peoplealso_km0o32z3jzm

Another on the fracking radar. Small MC. Strong buy signals

https://saskatoon.ctvnews.ca/nutrien-slows-hiring-expansion-plans-as-sales-drop-1.6394518
Seems like Nutrien is slowly becoming a buy. Fertilizer is still in a downtrend but getting closer and closer to historical lows. Natgas has already pretty much bottomed so fertilizer should also soon bottom. Give it a few months maybe.

I am busy for the next few days, but here's a handy link. It didnt work for ages, but the Northern Miners map room is back.
https://store.miningintelligence.com/

>>55116616
Thanks for bumping PM. Send rock pics

https://www.stepenergyservices.com/investors/reports-presentations-key-dates

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/STEP.TO?p=STEP.TO

These guys have a lot going on. Step energy services. I've just delving into them for real. I'll report back after I dig thru their case studies and other shit on their site. It's a lot of shit.
Not a sand play so maybe I'm not the purist I thought that I was going into this fracking thing.
Drillers are gonna do fine but the consumables in fracking like steel, sand, engines, pumps, trucks, idk, whatever else, these are gonna be the monster movers in the next couple of years.

Konnichiwa, anon-san. You are here for Japanese citizenship application?

>>55113781

>>55116694
will do when i get a moment!

why was no thread made for a few days

>>55117610
These guys make and rent gear out. Renting means proprietary everything, always, period. Unserviceable to roughnecks and the fat fingered wrench turners in the field so the company has boots on site for every rig. Tons of data gathering and analytics from them as well. Shit I don't think I'll ever understand in a million years.
But for that divvy you guys often rage about, this pick is looking tasty

>>55117846
It was only like a day and I suppose because there isn't much activity in the weekend anyway. No news or lines moving on my screen.

>>55118061
Do you not do any DD?
>Checks name
Disregard

>>55117134
https://www.stepenergyservices.com/services/nitrogen-fluid-pumping
>Pic related
This guy took stock options Nov 8th last year then the next day proceeded to buy like a million bucks worth of shares. Oh and he was nitrogen and fluids chief over at trican for like the last five or so of his 18 years there. He came to step and bought a mil worth of stocks for what reason?

>>55118086
https://wallmine.com/tsx/step/officer/1923769/michael-burvill.amp
^This guy
>Michael Edward Burvill serves as Vice President - Business Development and Innovation of the Company. He served as the president, U.S. operations of STEP from August 2018 to July 2019, was the senior vice-president, fracturing and cased hole wireline services from April to August 2018, and the vice-president, fracturing services from April 2015 to April 2018. Mr. Burvill has over 20 years of experience in the oil and gas service industry. Prior to joining STEP, Mr. Burvill worked at Trican for 18 years, the last eight of which he was corporate service line manager, during which time he led Trican’s global fracturing and nitrogen services exclusively. Prior to that he managed Trican’s Central Alberta district that deployed coiled tubing, nitrogen, cementing, fracturing and acidizing services, and downhole tools.

>>55117134
Trican is the superior WCSB play.
I'm jaded on step.

>>55118187
Give rundown. And read the rest of my posts regarding step deau

>>55118221
Reduced float by 40% since 2017.
Tier IV upgrades.
LNG Canada will be up and then its off to the races.

>>55118228
This guy left trican for step and bought million or so worth of stonks six months ago. Idk why but it caught my eye

>>55118266
I prefer it because of the dividend and they seem to be quicker getting the tier IV frac upgrades out quicker.

>>55118266
Am tarded

>>55118271
I'll read anything you send me on fracking
Load it up and yard it out. I'll dig it

>>55113513
I just got back from the beach. I yelled at a Mexican

>>55113926
Good pe and small market cap

Bump

Serious question- when will cmmg accept bitcoin as a commodity?

>>55119949
Serious answer - open wide

>>55119964
still a few more months at least then

>>55120031
Shhhhh now don't speak. It's a warm day and you're a thirsty boy

>>55119949
Whenever it becomes a commodity. Really waiting for those physical properties to manifest that will allow Bitcoins to become raw materials for use in industry. Any day now, surely?

>>55120168
it's backed by energy harnessed by raw material

it's real unlike the digital contracts you buy on the commodities market

>>55120318
So just because it's "backed" by a real commodity it's now a commodity? Commodities are raw materials. If it's not a raw material it's not a commodity. It doesn't get more simple than that.

>>55120318
It's not backed by energy just because you use energy to make transactions work. There is no energy available to holders of bitcoin.

Triple Point is gonna be yuge

>>55121179

Considering their 30% ownership, I bet it'll add 500 mil to 1 bil to Salts MC once it gets going and best thing is that this is government subsidized money.

>>55118941
Love a happy ending
>>55119944
Me on the right

>>55121266
checked, that's big, I smell a win

>>55120318
>it's real
Send pics
What are the dimensions, weight, etc

Looks like Predictive Discovery has managed to secure a A$40MM private placement at the current share price of A$0.15/share. No warrants either. Their cash burn rate is A$40-45MM/year so this derisks the stock quite a bit. I reckong they will need to raise money maybe two or three more times before the project reaches build stage. I've done the math there, it's an attractive risk-reward proposition for me if they will be able to raise the money they need in the future at or above the current share price. The major risk now is whether they'll get permits for this mine. The project area is inside of a buffer zone of a nature reserve and it is quite clearly stipulated that no mining should happen in the area they are in. But, this is Africa and the local Ministries of Mining and Environment seem to be supportive of this project. The company has been in very good terms with the local government and the people. I could see an exception being made for a possible tier 1 mine in the making.

This may be a risk I would be willing to take. This should be an easy buy at this price specially if they get the go-ahead from the authorities next year after the ESIA is done. It's a risk, and it's an opportunity. A resource update is coming soon... I think I want to take this risk. Will have to think about it a while longer.

Has there been news or hints regarding when Triple Point Resources will be (and on what exchange)?

>>55122689
>will be
listed, and on what exchange?

>>55122743
Are you asking how many weeks?

is that fucking fraggle rock? my childhood.

also when do i stop shorting natgas?

What is that big ass dump on copper? What happened?

>>55122689
>>55122743
yes there was something about a CSE listing coming but I don't remember a month it's expected, it might be buried in a release here

https://www.sedar.com/DisplayCompanyDocuments.do?lang=EN&issuerNo=00055624

>>55123468
>What happened?
anon...

>>55123378

>>55123530
Literally just a massive candle at 20:30. What a disgustingly coordinated attack. Completely inexplicable as far as I can see. Could it really be?

>>55123378
There isn't much left to short man. Natgas hasn't stayed at these low prices for long historically. In effect the stuff is now trying to find a bottom. Might have bottomed already who knows, or maybe it will go to $1.50 or whatever. But not an easy trade on the short side anymore. I'm rather long instead

>>55123468
markets dumping industrial metals because of the believed drop in industrial stocks. Add on a bunch of copper and zinc was dumped on the market, price crashes.

Bump for a pump.

It's a human trafficking ring and prostitution ring. That's what's going on here in this canyon
I'm gonna fuck them all up. It's gonna be bad

>>55125363
>$SONA
IIRC that was some super hyped-up biotech stock that got kicked square in the balls by not receiving approval for their product from the authorities? So many people lost their fortunes on that I hear. Biotech... never fucking ever

>>55125559
That's sana I think...

www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-05-29/namibia-mulls-taking-stakes-in-mining-petroleum-companies#xj4y7vzkg

uh oh

paladin so over priced - gunna drop harder IMO

>>55125687
Went ahead and checked. They were making rapid antigen test for the kung flu and received a "deprioritization" from FDA which eventually lead to them dropping the whole project after "feedback" from Health Canada a month later. Idk if this was corruption lead by big boys Pfizer & co or if their product was just unsafe or something. But bullshit like this is why I would never touch biotech with a mile long stick

https://youtu.be/rSY5XY8pQuQ
Some market talk from Commodity Talks

>>55127821
or Resource Talks whatever

Morning bump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6a4e4QB1B18
Good Montney / WCSB presentation from Shubham. 4 months old so fairly recent. Good info for anybody else besides myself who is interested in buying natgas producers when natgas has bottomed.

SELL:VRR

Remember a month back when those anons were shilling for GV and calling Golden Tag an easy double within weeks? Looks like that one didn't pan out either.

hello everyone, investing in commodities was the worst financial decision of my life

>>55130891
Bitcoin is still at an all time low. You should buy that

>>55130891
Second worst for me. First worst? Well we're all on this board I'm sure you can guess.

>>55130891
you can redeem yourself by warning others, like this future baggie

https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=401950

>>55130891
Worst decision… so far

Feeling comfy lads?
Stacked up some more SBSW.
Average still below 5 dollarinos.

https://www.kitco.com/news/2023-05-25/Bunker-Hill-Mining-announces-financing-plans-restart.html

Bunker Hill has been going on a rip the last week, here’s a good reason why. Any of you lads holding?

>>55130891
What would have have done instead? The only play that wouldn't have burned you would have been buying all physical metals.

I should've invested in that one salt mine company. This resurgent AI bubble is making me salty as fuck right now.

>>55131328
Sold mine at a bit above entry to buy sand. Source energy services is down 15 in five days or so. Waiting for it to pull back another 15-20% to buy more.

Anyone else but me and bluesmonke buying sand itt?
Anyone else wanna chime in on STEP energy? Or send reading material my way regarding fracking or similar?

>>55131774
This.
I was stupid to buy stonks when metals bottomed late last year. Considering tapping out and staying put at the 5k mark and focusing on physical only.
Playing the GSR every couple of years would be the ticket but as usual, I'm too late to make good decisions cuz muh tardation is super strong

>>55131328
Its great news to see them getting ready for restart at Bunker Hill, but we should be careful, a lot of projects have shit the bed shortly after starting their actual mine up, for all sorts of reasons. Bunker Hill has the info on where the ore is, it has a mill and from the sounds of it the right people to get it going but you never know with these early stages.

>>55131844
I've traded in and out of SND a few times, but something didn't sit right with me when they took on debt to buy out their largest holder earlier this year.
Sand, and oil servicing in general, just feels like a race to the bottom at this point. Reminds me of 2017/2018. Real economy is dying. Fake economy is back in style.
Some numbers may deny that demand is dead/dying, but the prices don't lie.

Newb question here lads...
What makes a company lost over half their market cap without tranny endorsements?

>>55132051
Are they going to use electric tanks and portable windmills to fight ww3?
Fracking and oil field services are going anywhere I think if anything we will need them much more in the next couple of years
>Took debt to buy largest holder
What's the difference? If the cost of servicing the debt is expected to be less than the cost of owning the shares outright then what's the issue? Selling stonks is the same as taking on debt; you owe someone else a piece of the action.
That one anon can't seem to comprehend this fact of reality and loathes debt while buying it himself in the form of shares

>>55130509
GV is another rocketred but with more accomplices. In fairness to GOG, if silver had gone up $3 instead of down $3 the last month all things silver would be looking pretty good right now.

>>55132072
How about oil losing half of its spot price and natty going down 80%? Just a wild guess

>>55132339
Speaking of, -5% WTI today wew

>>55132166
>Selling stonks is the same as taking on debt; you owe someone else a piece of the action.
Not exactly. Debt has a defined timeline and the conditions can change depending on the market. Leverage makes for higher risk in general.
More shares means less upside, but also less risk. As an individual, you can also control your personal risk through position sizing.
In recent times, banks have become incredibly reluctant to lend to the energy/commodities sectors, and the terms increasingly punitive. Coal stocks for example are much better off now that they're all debt free. Margins are better, supply more constrained, less risk all around.

In theory, if shares are undervalued then over the longterm buybacks make sense and improve valuation for remaining holders.
Dilution is the opposite. Plenty of seemingly overvalued tech stocks pump to infinity on repeated dilutions, locking in real value for previous holders. It may seem ponzi-like, but it's a real phenomenon. On the other hand plenty of seemingly cheap junior miners decay endlessly on repeated dilutions, locking in real losses for previous holders.

Back to SND, while it remains to be seen whether the transaction will be beneficial to remaining investors over the long term, the situation sketched me out. If the largest holder is that desperate to bail while shares trade near multi-year lows.. you've gotta wonder, why?
Especially when debt is involved.

>>55132339
Not seeing the drop in crude prices that correlate but idk what their percentage of oil:gas is either. I'm thinking to buy this dip tho since it's down >50% in six months
Since it's not a pure sand play I'm skeptical AF desu. At least sand has other industrial applications. Ceramics and mason jars. Shit like that will guarantee they never go fully under

>>55132522
If it's a fracking company, you could always look at the frac spread chart and see if it correlates?
https://oilprice.com/rig-count

Beyond that, maybe the company has had to make lots of capital investments and that has had a material impact on free cash flow, or maybe it's some financial issue instead of an operational one that has caused the stock price to fall. The EV/EBITDA ratio does seem inviting so maybe check the cash flow statements and balance sheet?

Anyone eyeing coal? Seems to be in the process of correcting. Might buy some once it appears to have bottomed.

>>55132603
Could be an opportunity to be sure. I would like to see more strength in energy before buying thermal, or iron ore/steel strength before buying coke

>>55132603
BTU is looking like a monster swing into next winter. Still a bit early though.

>>55132597
>company has had to make lots of capital investments
I'll have to check the archives but I think this is what happened. Lost my laptop so I don't have the 164 open tabs at my fingertips just now.
So yes I think you're right about that and I noted it previously, but considered it a good thing. Admittedly I'm a fucking rook at all this shit anyways so it takes me 10x the amount of research that see the same things you fellas just understand without digging

>>55132621
>before buying coke
Energy prices/demand have never, should never, would never, be a metric to buying coke.

>>55132693
The frac spreads seem to be plateauing right now and maybe going down from here in the short term so it could also just be the market smelling the danger ahead. If you ask me I would agree that making the necessary capital investments is a good thing even if the shareholders hate it in the short term. If the CAPEX is out of the way for now then the company would seem to be a better buy on an absolute basis right now (with the caveat that income/cash flow could be affected adversely by contracting frac spreads, i.e. decreasing revenue?)

Bear in mind that I know very little about this company and oilfield services as a sector. So I might be missing something crucial

>>55132736
But steel and iron ore prices are. I'm talking about coking coal of course, not cocainum

>>55131844
I'm watching you guys and will jump in when I have an opportunity.

>>55131902
You're not retarded we are just dealing with the most blatant, outright manipulation, corruption, and rigging of financial markets in human history.

>>55131985
Always good to keep a reality check in place. Being up 30% is considered a win by any trading measure, and securing your initial is always sound when you have the chance, because another opportunity is probably right in front of me.

>>55132805
No, he's right. To make it in commodities you need to buy the sector when the prices have bottomed, when P/Es and other ratios ironically enough look the worst.

An Atlas/Triple Point copycat has appeared on the scene

vortexenergycorp.com

>>55132664
Strong correlation here m8
I like it

>>55133005

These companies are going to start spawning left and right soon enough.
Hydrogen is coming to the markets really strong in the next couple of years and everyone will want a piece of that government subsidized pie.

>>55133248
>>55133005
Chariot has a 10GW hydrogen/offshore wind project which has received endorsement (MoU) by Port of Rotterdam. Loads of hydrogen projects in the works around the world... Time will tell how many of those go anywhere. It's a speculative, budding industry. Tread carefully boys

>>55133295
True
They'll be popping up like dandelions in the early summer at first then experience oversaturation leading to collapse and consolidation resulting in a supply crisis
That's the exact pattern I saw with fracking sand and I'm willing to bet my left nut it'll turn out the same way, exactly.
Would be a good idea to watch with hesitation and potentially short the fuck out of it once the saturation has peaked. Not smart enough or ballsy enough to short but it sounds reasonable

Oh, noes, PMET broes!
Are you o.k?

>>55133774
here comes the gap fill, good on you for not getting liquidated mate. I hate the way you post but I tip my fedora for your shorting.

>>55132834
We're in the bottom now. It just takes longer than you think. Three years from now you'll be laughing.

>>55133774
What's the rsi? Chart looking bearish.

>>55133964
bottom of what? Oil? Gold? Copper? Fertilizer? Iron ore? I don't think all of these have reached a bottom. I'm a bull but I'm not retarded.

>>55132051
Forgot to ask when you got in and out of SND?
Got in from late April to mid May averaging $1.65 per along the way. Watching you guys has me thinking about swing trading, only because I'm seeing patterns like pic related surging a few times a year only to taper off again.
What's your thesis on swinging? I d just sell off half when I thought it had topped and buy again when I thought it had bottomed. Because timing it is not possible it would be merely a DCA strategy I guess?
Sorry for the dumb question, I'm learning still.

Bump for a pump

>>55135315

To buy Petrobras, or to not buy Petrobras... Super fucking cheap and arguably the world's best offshore operator with lots of growth coming online in the next five years... On the other hand -- Lula...

>>55134583
>Forgot to ask when you got in and out of SND?
My most recent play was the Feb earnings. I saw SLCA bounce on their own earnings, and figured SND might get a sympathy bounce with their own release. Entered at $1.60 or so, sold most around $1.90. As I said, I wasn't a huge fan of that Clearlake repurchase.
I thought about doing the same this recent quarter, but SND pumped 10% intraday after the SLCA release and I just sort of forgot about it after that. If it stays this cheap, I'll be looking into the same move again 2 months from now.
>What's your thesis on swinging?
Selling half is a good idea, I usually leg in/out of positions over several trades.

In general, I doubt energy stocks will ever see a big rerating from here so its kind of down to them to earn out their current valuations through massive buybacks/dividends over time.
Anyone who's paying attention knows they're cheap, but it's also scary to hold them. There are no new buyers coming into the sector. I'm scared too.

>>55136270
Care to name a few other sand/oilfield services companies for me to research? I know you've mentioned some in previous threads. SLCA was one right? Were there other frac sand plays?

MOST COMMODITIES FUTURES OPEN DOWN IN CHINA ON WEDNESDAY MORNING, DRAGGED BY ENERGY FUTURES. LPG -6%, CRUDE OIL -4%. #OOTT #IRONORE DROPS BY 2.7%, #STEEL REBARS -1.6%. #NICKEL -1.2%, #ZINC -0.9%, #TIN, #ALUMINUM & #COPPER -0.2%. #GOLD IS UP 0.9% IN SHANGHAI.

>>55136301
What did silver do? Guessing down 1-2%

I've been thinking about uranium and a thought popped into my head that I already mentioned last year but it's now far more relevant.
If Uranium pulls back to it's 2020 levels, which is something I've been expecting since it peaked and so far it looks like it wants to drop down there, it'll meander in the lows at least until mid 2024 or maybe even longer.
Uranium giga bull thesis at least partly leans on the idea of uranium being scarce, but if the time horizon for this bull run gets extended to starting let's say 2 years from now, more and more producers have time to come online.
This means that there's not going to be any kind of a dramatic shortage during the bull run, which might make Uranium a pretty shit investment compared to anything else.
Just a thought about something we need to be aware of.
Still going to buy the hell out of it if it pulls back and gives that opportunity, but I'll also be ready to drop it in favor of something else if it looks like this run is sabotaged by increasing Western production.

>>55137153
The biggest bottleneck is in enriching it, not mining it. There's only a handful of companies that are allowed to do that, and need government regulation so they do not make weapons-grade uranium.
The bull thesis is still valid in my opinion. It takes approx 2 years to go from mine to reactor, and even with more startups, we're going to get hit with a supply crunch. I don't expect it to break $200, but there's a lot of attractive upside compared to the downside.

What drives demand for energy, anyways? Mostly industrial processes? If the economy is tepid, then demand for things like silver and copper goes down, too.

>>55136297
Lassen here. Scla is a huge MC. They have their fingers in tons of shit. As far as blue chips in the frac sand game, they're basically the Dr pepper. Ain't going nowhere anytime soon.
>>55136270
Good luck.

>>55133985
We are in the process of coming out of the bottom of.commodities. Gold almost hit the 1600 handle back in November and I think it actually did. We're hovering around 2000 now. We bottomed in November. Gold leads commodities. It's only.up from here.

>>55137153
I'd recomend subscribing to uranium insider if you're interested in the market. I'm not selling any of my core posistons. The market can explode at any moment. Justin hung is adamant on that and says that the uranium spot prices will not go lower.

>>55137153
I'd recomend subscribing to uranium insider if you're interested in the market. I'm not selling any of my core posistons. The market can explode at any moment. Justin hung is adamant on that and says that the uranium spot prices will not go lower. Encore is about to be listed on the Russell by the way.

>>55133774
Better sell while you're ahead.

>>55131774
>What would have have done instead?
Hmm, I dunno, maybe completely ignore the commodity bull thesis?
>>55137834
>It's only.up from here.
I've heard that so many times already

>>55137834
You're full of shit. Uranium has stayed up, oil could go up or down from here, copper and iron ore clearly haven't settled on a bottom yet, potash is in oversupply and trending down etc. Even gold can arguably retrace back to 1,800 from here. How can you be so certain that everything has bottomed?

>>55139179
>Hmm, I dunno, maybe completely ignore the commodity bull thesis?
And what? Stay in cash? kek

Not much glitz with Galleon but slowly and steadily advancing. Kind of the tortoise and the hare story of mining companies

>>55137850

I don't really care about what the talking uranium heads on youtube are saying at this point.
They've been calling for Uranium companies punching up at any moment now for couple of years. All this despite the huge support being hammered over and over again and the runs up getting smaller and smaller.
If these companies start breaking below the supports as they seem to be doing. I'm expecting to pick up Encore at around $1.5 where it has a gap to fill.

>>55140944
>Encore
That's a big company

>>55117846
Because you touch yourself after midnight

>>55141078
for you

>>55111611
i am financially devastated

>>55141233
How are you doing anally?

>>55141284
prolapsed af

>>55140944
Uranium juniors were very overvalued and refused to go down for like two years. At their peak they were pricing in like $100 uranium. Uranium itself is one of the best performing commodities in the last five years. I'm just holding Kazatomprom because it's cheap and pays a 6% divvy, and waiting for the juniors to dump more.

If source energy services has a few more red days I'll have to buy more

>>55141078
>>55141078
>>55141078
>>55141078

Endeavour Mining chads were we at? La Mancha stopped selling and gold had a green day = massive green candle. Looking forward to enjoying this ride. Also bought more Orezone. Cheapest producer in the gold sector... I also took a starting position in Predictive Discovery since they raised at a good price, major risk being environmental permitting but other than that I'm very bullish

>>55141585
It's gapped down twice in the past 3 days so if it recovers the 18dma it could be a good dip to buy. It's already almost filled the recent one

>>55141665
What's our target price to put in buy orders? $5.15?

>>55142411
I'm not sure desu

The way I'm looking it at, if it gets back above the 18dma then it stands a fair chance of filling that gap just below $6.
On the other hand, if it keeps breaking downwards and breaks that support it could magnet down to the gap at around $3, which would be a convenient time for it to touch base with the 200dma that it hasn't seen since January, two birds one stone.

That might be overly pessimistic but gaps that don't form on a trend reversal scare me, and it could depend on how the sand sector reacts to oil price which is absolutely shitting itself right now and poised to make a new low. I have no idea how fracking sand reacts to oil price in general, that's something you'll know way more about than me as well as if the individual company fundamentals are strong enough for it to keep rising despite any of that.

If you think the company is going to do well regardless of oil's short term movements then it could be a buy soon, if you think it'll get dragged down with oil it could be worth waiting a little while longer to see if it breaks support.

Personally I don't want to buy any more until it gets back over the 18dma and shows it can resume some kind of upward momentum, and when I know it's not going to eat shit thanks to oil dumpning so that I don't end up buying a bounce before a lower low/gap fill, but a lot of that may just be my overall sand ignorance talking and also I'm biased as I'm happy with the position I've got for now desu so I don't mind missing the bottom of the dip or just being wrong.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/exxon-shareholders-soundly-reject-climate-162030411.html
uhhhhh based?

>>55139280
Gold was at a sixteen handle in November. That was the low. The eight year cycle low in fact. You even said gold could go down to 1800 meaning that's the lowest you think it can go. The bottom was in November. That doesn't mean it's all rainbows from here, there's still gonna be shitty times but the absolute low was already made and the trend will continue on the upside.

>>55142776
What's your price target on that?

>>55120318
Are you saying Bitcoin is a battery I can plug in to power my electronics?

>>55143061
Looks like we speak a different language a bit here so I'll explain how I see it. "Bottomed" means that the price likely goes up from here, that it will not likely go down. It has been an uptrend since the 1,700 price but the uptrend in gold has been challenged by a recent triple top, and therefore it is not certain at all that the only way from here is up. Retracement is possible, and who knows where the direction is from there. I'm not saying it's a bad time to be long (I'm long) but I'm also not convinced the only way from here is up in gold or in any other commodity. Natgas is one commodity that I think is trying to figure out a bottom right now, not much in the way of downside and in my opinion a bright medium to long term future in terms of price. That's the closest to a commodity near a bottom in my opinion. Potash is another one I'm looking at, it's at like $400 right now and a technical price floor is at $200-300. That's also what I would call a bottom more or less

>>55143136
Look! look!
This one's retarded!!!

>>55143163
I'm trying to see if there's any actual use for it

>>55142776
Idk the correlation between the oil price and the sand prices. But I think I'll buy any dip I can get on any NWS fracking sand I can find and not be worried if it goes lower, I'll just buy more if itndoes

>>55143189
When they mine it they use fans to move air across the computers so they stay cool. So you could say it produces a lot of hot air

>>55143072
To buy? It depends which way it goes. I'll pick some more up either once as it's above the 18dma again and resumes upward trajectory, or if it shits itself alongside oil then I'll wait until it touches the 200dma.

To sell? idk mango I'm riding the coattails of Lassen's DD before I finally get around to reading all his links I've saved and actually learning what the fuck I'm talking about.
Chart wise, looking back there seems to be a gap every five minutes going all the way back to '18 when it was 100 bucks and sparse resistance along the way so which ones it fills will depend on the company and potential of sand itself. I haven't done nearly enough DD to have a real target yet I just know enough that I want to have my dick in the water.

>55143072
That said, I'd be happy with a $21 cup

>>55143285
Can't really go wrong with DCAing down if you're playing the long game

>>55143444
Woops
>>55143072

>>55143444
Not seeing much correlation here

>>55143387
I lost my laptop so I'm having to reread thru the archives to find my own DD
Kek. But I also stumbled on the copper /tin conversation that turned cold across the last four months or so. I'm liking copper plays now I'm reading those old threads. Some epic shit flinging too. Came for the DD, stayed for the bantz

>>55143533
The only primary tin producer I'm aware of is Alphamin

>>55143477
I see more in SLCA and SND but yeah SHLE seems to be dancing to its own drummer which bodes well

>>55143533
I remember this turd getting pumped in here at $0.80.

>>55143557
SNS too

>>55143564
... and this bitch, too.

>>55143568
Fuck I hope select sands comes around I'm into them for a grand and I wanna get more. Actually thinking to move to northern Arkansas or southern Missouri next year after I cripple these faggots here and kneecap the hunting club in an irrecoverable manner.
Fucking houses are cheap as shit in southern Missouri. Shagging soccer moms all over the boot heel of the show me state

>>55143629
kek at that picture. Good plan

>>55143564
I remember trading it quite successfully
>>55143587
I remember somebody bringing it up but I don't remember pumping

>Jim Jones

>>55144293
kek
tHe MaTh Is ThE mAtH

>>55143587
I remember an anon here wanting to buy York at over $1 US and I told him it was risky to chase and it would drop. Now might actually be close to the right time.

>>55135453
Ecopetrol maybe then?

Huge insider buys at Calfrac. Something may be up. I want to get into STEP but they only have Arc acting as an anchor investor, so the sellers can beat it down at will. Little concerned about the Alberta wildfires drastically diminishing the amount of completions too, perhaps making Q2 shittier than expected.

>>55143720
Man I can't find the shit in the archives or I haven't gone thru them all. I fucked up losing that laptop. I guess I'll just try to leave the archived links or put a page together and email you the NWS DD. It's a fucking lot tho muh 'tism forced me to read it all cover to cover. I don't sleep anyway so gotta do something productive. Honestly it's mostly just regurgitation of the same shit over and over. Rystad did a study and 300 dick fiends write articles or a synopsis which gets plastered on 6 gorrillon sites in 11 languages. No new info, just another asshole writing cliff notes he copy pasta'd from another dick fiend across town writing for another publication.
Very little in the way of workable knowledge desu. Imagine being peter schiffs pocket protector and listening to the same shit all day every day.
That's what every fucking commodity is, sand included.
It's god damned annoying but if it was easy every swinging dick would do it

>>55144838
>Huge buys
Where? By whom?
>Pic related
Yahoo's insider purchases list. Six months no activity unless it just fucking happened and they ain't got wind of it yet. Gibs ragoo pl0x

I've covered the insider purchases at step already. I'm watching them like a hawk as oil drops

Step actually had this dude making big ass purchases the day after he exercised and took his shares. Nov 8-9th like a million bucks by the guy who was a chief at trican for 8/18 years. And doing the job step has basically tailor fit to him and he's buying because he intends to kick fucking names and take some ass
>>55118086

>>55143189
There isn't. That's why some people value it so much.

>>55145006
This lil nigga didn't do shit but spend money on STEP on November 9th of 2022. Didn't do one fucking thing all day but buy the shit out of that shit like fuck the price I'm all in

>>55145050
Oops
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/STEP.TO/insider-transactions?p=STEP.TO
Tarded today fellas

Starting to catch some correlations between step and crude

>>55144792
The political risk is about the same imo

cant buy SPUT in EU >:(

>>55144900
>I don't sleep anyway
One-way ticket to dementia town

>>55145404
>404

>>55144900
>I fucked up losing that laptop
Lost as in misplaced or lost as in destroyed?
>I guess I'll just try to leave the archived links or put a page together and email you the NWS DD. It's a fucking lot tho muh 'tism forced me to read it all cover to cover
Don't worry about putting shit together my sake man I've got plenty to read from the archives and the links you posted a few threads ago though I appreciate it
Sucks you lost all those tabs though just for your own referrence.

>>55145427
lmao

Speaking of sleep, night lads

>>55145457
It s just got more on it that didn't get posted but should have. I learned the hard way about the oil field services ginformation circle jerk and the niggardliest punditry since a Roosevelt was in office. So a lot of stuff is not a poignant as I'd like to present it

The spirit of the Samurai is dead, sell Irving

>>55145864

>>55111611

Imagine $147 oil in the next 2 years. The best gold miners will have AISC at $2,500 with gold at $2,500. All while diluting shares as mgmt skims the top and pays people to pump their stock. No thanks.

Collin Kettell selling his NKG

Step energy is the one boys.
Looking back I realize how fucking dumb I was to miss that covid rollout dip in April 2020. Wtf was I even doing?
The question is what is the bottom on oil and what should be the target buy in price to start getting in?

>>55146293

https://www.mining.com/web/zijin-urges-colombia-to-protect-gold-mine-after-attack/

Another mine in Colombia facing attacks from hostile groups. Peru and Equador have also seen a spike in these sorts of attacks.

>>55146293
Is STEP your be-all-end-all oilfield services company then? What made you choose this one?

>>55146431
Them and phx as far as oil field services I think yeah my favorites so far. Main line is NWS fracking sand tho. I'm still learning so I'm not so so sure about anything really.
Do your own DD but if you see what I see in that DD it's not a tough decision

>>55146569
Aight thanks for sharing your thoughts as always

>>55146695
What are you looking for? Profits obviously. But what's your investment thesis?
I'm picking all these because the govt will use up all the oil and gas in the world to switch to green energy to get the world away from oil and gas. It fits my thesis perfectly almost too perfectly.

>>55146865
Honestly, I'm not sure. I'm very unfamiliar with OFS and fracking materials as a sector. I think it's a very hated sector so I think there may be opportunity there. Also I think I've read somewhere that there are some DUCs, drilled and uncompleted wells, that would be cheaper to get to production. I think there's a chance that now that o&g prices are in a bit of a slump producers will seek to cut costs by drilling less verticals and going for DUCs or something. Rig counts have been falling faster than frac spreads which seems to indicate that drilling decreases faster than completions in this price range. Furthermore, it may be that production and production increases are high enough to bring down oil prices. This would mean many upstream producers would begin losing money. The OFS companies may offer a better value proposition in that case.

>>55146957
Holy shit I need to learn whatever the fuck you're talking about here...
Teach me. What's going on here?
I stumbled onto fracking via sand research cuz I'm a mining history buff for no fucking reason at all other than an ancient order needed a scribe.
If you teach me I'll show you every fucking thing I know, share everything Ive gathered, bend over backwards to no end to learn this shit. I'm not gonna get lucky twice so putting the work in is expected

>>55147286
https://oilprice.com/rig-count the chart shows frac spread counts if you click the drop down box and select frac spread. You can compare the frac spread count to the rig count. You can also select production to compare production to rig count. To me it seems that the frac spread has remained pretty stable looking at the 5y chart, while rig count has risen relatively higher and is now beginning to come down more maybe. Sidenote: decline rates in US shale are like 60% in the first year after completion so if the prices aren't on the producer's side the well may never pay out. Rig counts tend to lag oil by like two months due to contracts etc

I don't know much but DUCs are drilled and uncompleted wells. Basically, they are vertical wells that have been drilled but not put into production. In the shale as you know you need to fracture the source rock in order to increase the permeability and get those verticals flowing. In order to "complete" the DUCs they need to be tied in and the shale rock needs to be fracked with horizontal wells. So anyways I think I read from somewhere that there are a bunch of DUCs sitting around that companies may have chosen not to complete for whatever reason. I think that some of those are probably lower quality wells to begin with but maybe some have been left uncompleted for some other reason. And if prices stay relatively low producers will of course make less money, the US shale tends to be swingy as some plays don't pay out much at all when oil is $60 but make fabulous IRRs at $120. So maybe in order to cut CAPEX, there will be less horizontal drilling and more completions since it costs quite a lot to drill a 10k foot well.

Extra charts if you're interested in rig counts
https://boereport.com/us-rig-count/ US rig counts in more detail, basin specific
https://boereport.com/caoec-rig-count/ Canada rig counts
also here's a rig map for Canada which I've never used but cool stuff anyways https://riggertalk.com/drilling_rigs.php

>>55147487
>So maybe in order to cut CAPEX, there will be less horizontal drilling and more completions
less vertical drilling* and more completions (of DUCs)

>>55147487
Bob? That you?
This is terrific info. Fuck that's awesome desu.
Ok so here's the skinny as I have done to understand it
New vert holes couple million and there are fucking lots of them clogged with IBS sand that are just now experiencing the technology and affordability while oil and gas are also low like pre covid numbers.
Those and others are gonna be refracked I guarantee it. They got all kinds of fancy shit to bore holes and guide that fucker track where it's gonna need to tube out. It's crazy but they're doing it because each of those layers of depth have horizontal access for like fucking miles potentially which has been estimated (can't recall just now) to be over a quarter million per punch of oil left down the hole due to that cheap ass IBS sand clogging them up. They're gonna do this instead of drilling new holes without a doubt because the cost versus reward is staggering. Bottom heavy so I fucking like it because the value is there

>>55147586
naw I'm the Finnish dude from the pmg days like yourself
>New vert holes couple million and there are fucking lots of them clogged with IBS sand
big if true, refracing an old horizontal sounds a lot cheaper than drilling a new horizontal just to complete some DUCs. If there are many of these the producers will absolutely refrac them to cut down on costs as much as possible.

Many mediocre companies operating in the shale are basically just a proxy to oil prices and many of these made big promises last year about big divvies and production ramp ups when prices were good. The management teams also tend to be incentivized to increase production anyways to get their bonuses and other moolahs. So they have immense pressure to keep on producing even though the price isn't good for them right now. What choice do they really have I mean, if they stop putting money into the ground the decline rates fuck over their revenues and all the shareholders would be out for blood when they expected to see production rise. It's a tough spot for marginal US shale plays at these prices.

>>55147513
I wonder if the permitting for new versus refracking is noteworthy or relevant at all. Less barriers to entry the better.
One of the tubing companies was what led me down this rabbi hole of the refracking. The tubes are tiny too like they bend it off a truck they bring up on a fucking 48 foot flatbed and they're leaving it and the sand in the ground. I don't like water because you have to do something with it later.
The rig counts are gonna help now I can try to track their usage of consumables like sand and water, tubing, idk whores and beer maybe whatever they're using

>>55147654
Do note the difference between rig count and frac spread. Rig count shows the verticals, frac spread shows the horizontals. If I understand correctly I mean. The frac spread count actually matters more since almost all new production in the US comes from shale.

>HCMLY (coastal sand / aggregates) up like 24% YTD and I have no position
>EWW (mexico etf) also up a similar amount
You'll never guess what funny green bags I'm holding at a loss

>>55147643
Good to see you finnbro
Your cadence had some Bob in it. You should troll as Bob. Use plebbit spacing and response to your own posts like anons wanted you to elaborate on shit they didn't wanna read anyway.
I'm pretty sure that laptop will turn up and I'll have a better chance to cross reference with this new info you've just revealed to me thats somehow on oilprices site I visit 20 times a day and never knew existed.
What else you got? How do I track how much sand, water, tubing etc is being consumed in what areas and at what rates? Seems hyper specific but I do have some stronk 'tism and I'm looking for correlations here

>>55147728
How?

>And this one... this is the prostate punisher.

https://www.cathedralenergyservices.com/who-we-are

>>55147586
This is that fancy shit they're doing to directionally drill holes horizontally and otherwise. Truly impressive

>>55146357
Whos funding? CIA? Russia? China?

>>55146957
Nigger are you really going to shill this investment for three months and when somebody asks what your thesis is you're going to respond "not sure"?

Nigga wtf. Lol.

>>55143189
it's a store of value
it's the first digital asset unable to be replicated, verifiable by anybody, and controlled by nobody

it's perfect money

>>55146957
>buy first
>ask questions later

>>55148794
Will the Amish take it?

>>55148844
sure, why not

>>55148858
Cool. You got any way to verify that?

what stocks are worth buying when it comes to uranium? all I've got is UEC

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4608616-divergences-in-ratios-show-silver-is-undervalued

GSR is back on the menu bo°s

>>55148965
go ask your local amish

>>55144937
Huuuuge
Almost 20k of purchases in a 300m market cap company

>>55148774
What have I been shilling for three months?>>55148774

>>55147948
I don't have any info on stuff like sand prices or markets, or tubing or anything like that. I suppose you could look at the area-specific rig counts and extrapolate that there is probably more fracking/OFS demand in those areas, aka Permian and Eagle Ford. Although Eagle Ford apparently is a more swingy play so maybe focusing on Permian is better. Canadian shale is also a big consumer and I would wager production growth over there will happen more over time, but at a slower rate because of the limited and "artificially" suppressed infrastructure growth. Canada has so much fucking gas and loads of oil too but lack of market access and slow permitting of pipelines and power plants and whatnot has made the growth in production slow and steady which I actually like. In the US there will still be some production growth but it seems to be plateauing

Canadian plays are better, lower breakevens, but also much less oil relative to gas production. It's like 90% liquids in the US shale while in Western Canada Sedimentary Basin there are three zones: dry gas, wet gas, and oil. NE B.C. is more gas weighted generally and Alberta is more liquids weighted. I don't remember exactly but I think the oil area in WCSB is like 60% liquids. But yeah as seen in the chart at >>55146957 Canadian plays have lower breakevens. They also have lower decline rates so they pay out better in the long run. This is why I like Canadian natty producers like Tourmaline. Shubham Garg has good educational videos on this stuff like this here https://youtu.be/6a4e4QB1B18 if you're interested in learning, very long videos and densely packed with info. I also follow WTI realist, brilliant guy and 2/3 of the paywall articles are readable for free: https://wtirealist.substack.com/

Is there any point in further investing in gold or silver miners if people can't discuss buying the physical gold/silver bags those miners sell, since /pmg/ started auto-saging?

>>55150910
Has it actually started auto saging or is it just full of newfags who don't know what a bump limit is?

Metal heads, when moon?

>>55151158
you hodl forever

>>55151158
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ISX85qZW_o

>>55151258

Imagine participating in a private placement for the company to buy carbon credits.

>>55149248
Tried calling them but their number must be unlisted idk. When they accept it and I can spend it at the farmers market I'll buy some bite coins
>>55149410
Gawd dayum! If I had his money, I'd burn mine
>>55150212
Thanks for the info finnbro I'll pour over it later
It's six am and I have a human trafficking ring to destroy today so maybe tomorrow I'll get to it

>>55150910
How many /pmg/ threads do you guys have going at once? Theres two that have less than a few dozen posts each
Have you guys tried doing a 360 and walking away?

Horse hoes ...
https://ceo.ca/@newsfile/bayhorse-corporate-update

>>55152231
no more financings btw, just wait until that muck reaches the offtaker in Singapore!

>>55151551
>It's six am and I have a human trafficking ring to destroy today so maybe tomorrow I'll get to it
Good luck and stay safe bro, I look forward to hearing the rundown

SHLE bouncing off support, let's see if it holds

>>55152818
Yeah. Gonna be interesting. I've got so many fucking surveillance devices planted for so long I can't recall where they all are. I left some to be intentionally found so they think it's the only one. Worked like a charm. I see the gaps between the files on the bait device that lets me know where to look on the other device for the goods. The bait device has the good shit deleted so that's the schedule.
Fucking people are so dumb

Africa FUD gets BTFO'd once again
https://www.africa-energy.com/news-centre/article/namibia-no-plans-stakes-existing-gas-mineral-licences

>>55151158
>>55151471

>>55152997
kek godspeed dude

Yet another new ID because I keep getting banned lol

Uraniumbros .. is the pain over?

What's going on with blue lagoon?

>>55153388
If you're not getting bannd then you aren't shiptoasting correctly

>>55153716
true dat

new ID lol

The (EMOtional?) doc doubles down. Is the math the math? Will anonymous posters post more smug anime girls? We will see ...

>>55154263
honestly probably not a bad time to buy if you're bullish on EMO longer term. Might retrace back to .20s though. Seems like most of the hot air has been deflated out of the share price by now

>>55152231
still no mining permit for gayhorse

>>55152231
>>55154455
GO also stopped drilling brandywine.
Is he finally running out of money?

Every company I posted caps of above except SHLE, essential and PHX are up like 5% today. My watchlist won't let me juxtapose them against the companies I hodl which is probably my ineptitude showing

Why do oil and gas futures always start crabbing at 2:30 ET

>>55154506
Looks like sector correlation with oil after all.

I've just noticed that the support that SHLE is bouncing off is almost perfectly lined up with the 50% fib retracement so if oil stops shitting itself or SHLE just continues to ignore oil movement then this may be the bottom. I just boughted a little bit more in case it is and if it does end up gap filling further down then I'll just DCA at the 200dma

>>55155134
Niiiiiice
That's good work brother

>>55155223
It's likely overkill with all this shit given how small of a stock it is kek but whatever it's been fun and I've been bored and hey so far so good

>>55156405
Well no telling tho. Some guys in here swing big fucking bucks so if they were making moves that panned out it would be serious as a heart attack

uranium sisters how are we feeling

>>55151448
I tried listening to this
QRD? I can't can't lad half hour is too much

I recently started using TD's brokerage services, despite having a long-standing regular bank account there.
Anyways, Centerra Gold got an upgrade as per an analyst report this morning

>>55158018
>operating two mines
Kyrgyzstan thanks Centerra for the charitable contribution to the national wellbeing of its citizens

>>55158185
>>55158018
if memory serves didnt the Kyrgyzstan gov end up getting screwed too? The corrupt official that took over the mine ended up fucking the site up so badly that it no longer makes money?

>>55158695
I don't know but that would be about the usual goverment efficiency

>>55159294

https://www.mining.com/web/glencore-said-to-prepare-sweetened-teck-bid-as-deadlock-drags-on/

The Glencore / Tech saga continues!

>>55156906
>checks price
>no longer a $53 stablecoin
Well that's something I guess

>>55152231
silver retard was right Bayhorse is profitable at $10 silver and Gram spent $1,000,000 on the high tech ore sorter that he never uses because he is not mining that glorious mountain of the world's highest grade silver ore the other mine operators walked away from repeatedly. Any day now Gram is going to show you what a genius he really is. And, don't forget those PhD geologists working for Bayhorse, you how hard it is find a geologist let alone a PhD geologist? Sheeeiiiit don't get me started. I told you idiot more than one year ago Gram never submitted a complete application for a mining permit.

>>55160594
Speaking of which I found these guys that look like a dud and a half as they keep on losing money. I know they can't all be winners but I wonder how many companies out there are actually lifestyle or otherwise scams or duds

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/RKMSF?p=RKMSF

>>55160877
>I wonder how many companies out there are actually lifestyle or otherwise scams or duds
90% of TSXV listings
98% of CSE listings
100% of OTC-only listings

This clown world ...

>>55154263
>EMO
https://ceo.ca/@globenewswire/emerita-resources-corp-announces-8000000-private

>>55160594
Will I ever be able to get rid of my bayhorse bags

>>55144293
>>55144402
>>55154263
>>55162633
today will be a kekfest on ceo, the Emerita Jim Jones might end up killing more than the original

>>55162793
>>55162633
RIP EMO shareholders. Company clearly isn't hospitable for capital.

>>55163033
checked

>>55160877
Unlikely Rokmaster is a lifestyle considering the ceo made open market buys of over a million dollars over just the last couple of years. How long would it take to get that back and profit via salary? Not that I'm vouching for the company in any of regard though.

128 people in the emo shitshow, congrats to all who didn't drink the Kool-aid

>Yeah buddy, finally some money so I can buy more shares.
>Broker has coded their site such a way that every page action has a connection to an ad server
>This apparently applies to the bank transfers too
>Do an instant bank transaction to their account
>Adblock stops the brokers site from loading after the transaction is completed, because of the ad server connection when returning from the bank's servers
>*Sorry something went wrong with the instant transaction, your money will be transferred in 1-3 working days instead*
>Mfw it's fucking Friday

Anyone who outsources their coding to Pajeets needs to be fucking hanged.
Imagine having a bank transfer interrupted because they connected an ad server into it, just so they can make fraction of a cent selling your data.
I bet that transaction won't go through and I'll need to call the fucking bank and the broker to sort it out.

>>55163758
Ah. Didn't see that. Just saw there's eps getting lower and lower I think that's why I got the giggles over it. I did t mean to call it a scam because I genuinely do not know
>>55161551
C'mon man it can't be that bad
>Checks portfolio
I mean, it can't happen to me right

>>55142411
>I didn't buy at $5.15 cuz retarded, greddy, gay nigtard
Pic very related

Bluesmonke I hope you pull the trigger when I was playing with my dick

>>55165176
That cup is still looking bullish. Let it cool down all weekend

>>55165197
Ok will do. Gonna put another nickel into it but I should've done didded it yesterday

>>55165176
I sure did my man, bought at around $5 when I noticed the 50% fib support

>>55149004
Encore energy is the best stock in the sector.

>>55152231
Why would they need a financing when they have bags of ore ready to ship to the ocean deal they started as three years ago?

>>55153193
She's hot and I would fuck her. Looks great for her age. Inspiration for me that I can bag some hot puss in my older age. Maybe even have some kids.

>>55165484
Nice. Glad to hear that. I'm guessing me and you the only ones sandbagging around here. I hope these other fellas come around and we all make a ton of money

>>55165484
It's also back above the 18dma like I said would be my buy signal, but I'll see if it can fully break the oversold next week before buying more since I bought yesterday.

Oil's pump today helped too I imagine. SLCA and SND also up. SLCA gapped open though which I bet will fill as soon as oil completes its bounce.

>>55165618
I think we might be but others have said they're watching at least. If SHLE really is gonna put in a $21 cup then there's still time, or it'll at least make people pay attention when it does lol

>>55165653
Wait...
Wtf is a $21 cup?
Blanton's on the rocks?

>>55165692
See
>>55143444
Or pic related

Long term inverse head and shoulders would be even better but let's take it easy lol

>>55165762
Sweet Jesus. Is this real? How did they teach that cat to dance?
I think I just came in my pants a little bit

Not smart enough to TA just yet like you fellas. But seeing these companies that are on the lower half of the 52w are on my radar

>>55165793
It sure would be nice but one step at a time I guess, I want some healthy space between us and that gap.

>>55162676
>Will I ever be able to get rid of my bayhorse bags
Yes, you can sell them now at the low low low all time low price of $0.18. A class action suit against silver anon will get your money back because of all the fraudulent financial advise he gave you.

>>55166107
you forgot a zero fag

Step, calfrac and source all made 10% green moves today

>>55167257
He's talking Canadian dollars

>wkend thread already slow as Mexicans at the DMV
Well, time to spam fracking sand DD and images of monkes

new bread
>>55169684