[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 2.88 MB, 300x300, 1519702479109.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55127275 No.55127275 [Reply] [Original]

I feel very strongly that abandoning the original Chainlink logo was an enormous mistake.
The new logo is too anodyne, it has no virility.
If a Chainlink Labs employee is reading this, please tell Sirgay that he needs to use resume using the original logo in some capacity.
We love Sirgay but we love the cubes even more.

>> No.55127280

token not needed

>> No.55127284

>>55127275
Sergey says hi but wants you to know you can stick it up your arse and fuck off while you're doing it

>> No.55127298
File: 74 KB, 900x900, 1515802308013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55127298

>>55127284
>you can stick it up your arse

>> No.55127304

>>55127275
I feel as though only a few know what is coming it is so obvious

>> No.55127404

Chainlink, the world’s largest oracle network now has 2124 integrations, that’s 1700+ more than it’s closest competitor.

Chainlink Staking v0.1 launched 1 month after a crowdsourced audit.

Crowdsourced audit of CCIP is now live, it ends on June 12th!

Accumulate & HODL.

>> No.55127412
File: 237 KB, 1600x1218, f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55127412

>>55127298
>You

>> No.55127414

>>55127275
totally agree, the original logo feels like a collectible item you want to buy and have. It provides a subtle gamification. Not a coincidence our biggest pumps came with the original logo. The new one is generic and creates no impression.

>> No.55127425

>>55127414
Not to mention it’s used by many companies, look at jbg smith for starters

>> No.55127428

>>55127275
The logo became sterile as the company became a lab. It's fitting op.

>> No.55127442

>>55127414
they probably don't want to make it look like a collectible. paired with their constant insinuation that it will become more valuable over time (without outright saying it) it would clearly be an unregistered security. the logo being more wishy washy (plausible deniability) is not an accident

>> No.55127702

>>55127275
I'm in this shitcoin that is actually building something useful (an L1), but most early holders do not realize it. The current criticism from token holders is:
>NOT ENOUGH MARKETING
>I WOULD CHANGE THE BACKGROUND COLOR TO A DIFFERENT SHADE OF GREEN
Do you understand what I'm telling you, anon?

(Just so I don't have to return here and in case anyone asks, that token's ticker is PC)

>> No.55127710

>>55127275
the cube was nice but does look a lot more unprofessional than the current logo