/biz/ - Business & Finance

feedback fishing bot
if nobody gives feedback nobody pays for the threads and 4chan goes bankrupt
and who are shitcoins shilling then to?

>>55013520
Avalanche and Avalanche Subnets are the future.
It scales and has sub second finality, interoperability between subnets and subnets are also fully customizable and it already all works TODAY its not just an empty promise.
You can even run your own validator and help decentralize the network further.
also Aalanche has the best staking mechanism in the entire market.
if you dont hold any AVAX yet then you are probably dumber than a nigger.

>>55013659
I hold AVAX, and im on my way to become an AVAX validator. With that being said, do you think people will want to migrate all their projects to avax? I mean, its EVM compatible, which facilitates that a lot, but still.

>>55013706
Avalanche opens up to all developers. It supports ALL VMs not just the EVM.
So its not only targeting EVM developers but all developers and they can build in whatever language they want whatever custom VM they want for their usecase.
>do you think people will want to migrate all their projects to avax?
they dont really have a choice, if you dont have the flexibility, sub second finality and the throughput of Avalanche you arent going to be able to compete against the same/similar dapps.
example lending: your users get liquidated because your shit L2 is slow and has 3 weeks finality while Avalanche users can adjust their position and have it final in under a second.
what system will win out?
the fast one or the slow one? its obvious.

>web3
bruh you stuck in 2021 or sumtin? even the AI shit is a bust now

>>55013915
>doesnt know about the LLM Subnet
ngmi

Boomp it

>>55013520
>>55013536
>>55013659
>>55013706
>>55013825
>>55013915
>>55014024
>>55015049
The future of web3 is ICP, everyone knows this.

>>55015121
get lost jeet

>>55013520
An alternative L1/L0 to Ethereum. All L2s will perish when Ethereum dies. And it will eventually die.
>>55013659
>>55013706
>>55013825
Avalanche suffers from front-running, MeV attacks, and buying a single NFT for their "flagship" game Shrapnel cost me $15 in gas. That is NOT the future. Avalanche is logically flawed, and will also fail.
>>55015121
ICP is a VC-riddled boomer scam, like Amway.

>>55015121
I don't understand why there are retards here who are saying ICP is better when it is literally dogshit. better at what? I challenge you to show me a single proven quality or advantage of ICP over Avalanche

>>55015121

>>55015121

>>55013520
l2 likely
but avax shills are insufferable

>>55013520
Cardano

>>55013520
Avalanche FETO chain.

Let's fork ethereum, slap our own consensus on it and call it Avalanche, let's call it the ETH killer, and siphon liquidity from Ethereum through dial up technology called a bridge. Let's partner up with a law-firm, defame other competitors. Let's 'borrow' subnet terminology from Dfinity.

Let's build a 2D-point and click game called crabada on Avalanche, almost went offline due to congestion. Future of finance, real scaleability, $14-$70 gas fees during peak congestion. Yeah bro, best chain in the space. Can't put files larger than few MB on the blockchain, let's call it avalanche.

Pathetic web2 baggies.

All AWS-EC2 chains are cursed by the operational cost to keep the network online and running.

Solana, avalanche, pretty much every smart contract platform in the space is cursed by cloud cost.

Decentralized? 1 call from Biden to Bezos can take down the entire network.

>>55013659
>interoperability between subnets
https://twitter.com/dominic_w/status/1501543424863965191
Nice try benchod

>>55018169
Based.
High IQ take

>>55018194
those are just twitter ramblings of some loser who never made it.

>>55013520
dapp developer here, it's L2s. it will become obvious next year. hint: the catalyst is ZkEVM.

Among the L1 shitchains only polygon will survive because it's a centralized sidechain able to implement that tech (it already is), all the other L1 eth alternatives have no chance.

If you hold AVAX, SOL, ADA, DOT, you're fucked and you should sell as soon as possible. They are set to be the biggest losers for the next cycle, by far. This is friendly financial advice. It's mainly those four that are clear losers, it's likely that ICP will get hurt too but I wouldn't bet for it to die out because its dapps can actually compete with upcoming L2 ones.

>unbiased
also fyi I only hold microcaps and fiat, I shouldn't even talk about this normie midwit shit imagine bagholding a fuckign 11 digit mcap

>>55015121
>The future of web3 is ICP, everyone knows this.

>>55018194
Lol this guy seethes at Avax 24/7 what a cuck. It was after Avax proved their subnet interoperability that he started this massive avax fud campaign and the cryptoleaks thing lol

>>55018778
>>55018953
I want to see you two debating

>>55018953
interesting but why DOT? it is L0 not L2?

>>55018953
>>55019382
I see DOT being really important in the future for connecting centralized and decentralized blockchains. Also, lots of development is still rolling along on Polkadot.

avalanche subnets

>>55019382
>>55019393
everyone dealing with "eth killers" including DOT should stop talking about tech performance. It's not about how well the tech works, It's about *WHERE* it is, ie if normies will use it, if it will make a difference for them. It doesn't need to work best, it just needs to work.

Compare this situation with Microsoft taking over the market 40 years ago, it's very similar. They weren't the best, at all. But they delivered, at scale.

We're talking money here, so normie adoption is the point.
Every ETH killer tech proposition is simply not needed in comparison to the broader eth L1 and L2 ecosystem that is about to explode in growth.

I'm sure AVAX subnets have features that work better than on eth L2s, but it doesn't matter if they are *somewhat* present on ETH via L2. If your feature (like DOT L0) is not present on ETH, ask yourself if it's present in single-feature-focused projects like Chainlink. Those projects won't die either, because they are being used directly by the ETH layers ecosystem.

ENS is another perfect example, no one will care about domain systems in eth killers regardless of how they perform in comparison. The only competitors to ENS will be completely outside of EVM chains, like STX's .btc domains, or even HNS (handshake).

again, i don't own any of this shit because i don't like losing money. you shouldn't like it either btw, you should build value once and sell it twice, that's how you make money (you're being played on this)

>>55019450
Well the thing DOT has going for it is that the SEC isn't looking at is as a security anymore. I think there is plenty of room for both ETH and DOT this next market cycle.

>>55013520
>>55013659
>>55013706
>>55013825
>>55014024
>>55015049
>>55015995
>>55016292
>>55016350
>>55018778
>>55019123
>>55019182
>>55019427
Every AVAX shill is a grassroots community marketer who gets paid in AVAX to do it. They reply to themselves with different IDs and create lots of fake interest and discussion. If you browse /biz/ for a few days you'll see how inorganic all of this is. Their objective is to make you buy AVAX, hold it and maybe even stake it (for a negative inflation adjusted yield, which they will lie about). They will manipulate you with hope, technojargon, AI waifus and dreams of riches while getting paid by higher-ups who slowly dump on retail with the tokens they created for themselves for free. Go look at EOSETH chart and read about the history of EOS. This is the exact same scam all over again for newfags like you who don't know how this works. Don't fall for it, they are masters at manipulating.

Inflation numbers:
Circulating supply Jan 27 2022: 244,852,769
https://web.archive.org/web/20220127152152/https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/avalanche

Circulating supply Jan 27 2023: 314,771,897
https://web.archive.org/web/20230127081851/https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/avalanche

(314,771,897 - 244,852,769) / 244,852,769 = 0.2856 = 29%

https://cryptoleaks.info/case-no-3
https://cryptoleaks.info/case-no-5

https://www.fxstreet.com/cryptocurrencies/news/130-million-pulled-out-of-avax-cross-chain-bridge-after-two-exploits-202109211433
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2021/09/21/vee-finance-hit-for-35m-in-second-major-exploit-on-avalanche/

>>55018169
>Avalanche FETO chain.
>
>Let's fork ethereum, slap our own consensus on it and call it Avalanche, let's call it the ETH killer, and siphon liquidity from Ethereum through dial up technology called a bridge. Let's partner up with a law-firm, defame other competitors. Let's 'borrow' subnet terminology from Dfinity.
>
>Let's build a 2D-point and click game called crabada on Avalanche, almost went offline due to congestion. Future of finance, real scaleability, $14-$70 gas fees during peak congestion. Yeah bro, best chain in the space. Can't put files larger than few MB on the blockchain, let's call it avalanche.
>
>Pathetic web2 baggies.
>
>All AWS-EC2 chains are cursed by the operational cost to keep the network online and running.
>
>Solana, avalanche, pretty much every smart contract platform in the space is cursed by cloud cost.
>
>Decentralized? 1 call from Biden to Bezos can take down the entire network.

>>55019541
Nice organic post. Have a (you) bot.