/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55000272
It's proven in about 500 different roundabout ways...

My question is why the kikes don't just fucking acknowledge it.

I'm sure we would dump 30% if they came out and said it though... Fucking kike clown world.

why should we want to prove this?

Believe me, it isn't. If it were, insiders would've bought all the available LINK tokens in circulation.

>>55000272
its never mooning, just take the L and move on, or kill yourself

>>55000389

Not true. Sergey's dumps were bought by and/or given to the insiders well in advance.

>>55000272

This slipped under the radar as well - this one explicitly states "DLT Tech"

Found it on Jonathan Ehrnfeld's LinkedIn likes

This is the “in your face” part of the story where they tell you before it happens. I forget what its called, something with the word “method” in it.
>bro you could have bought it you just had to do hours of research on these giant institutions that nobody knows about.

>>55000455

So this SSImple uses DLT - specifically, R3's Corda - does R3 Corda use Chainlink Oracles? I believe so but having trouble re-finding the breadcrumbs

>>55000493
Corda and Chainlink severed ties

>>55000626

no they didn't, Corda uses the Accord Project Stack which uses Chainlink oracles.

FUD

>>55000272

Bump

are link marines retarded? This is objective proof that tradfi is using Chainlink and nobody cares?

>>55000272
two more weeks
trust the plan
Sergey is in control

Q

>>55000782
>>55000000

ummm guys?

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/swift-securities-view-gains-rapid-momentum-drive-reduce-settlement-fails?utm_campaign=Risk&utm_content=Oktopost-linkedin&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_source=linkedin

>>55000782
>are link marines retarded?
ya

>>55000782
have another bump

now its more clear

>>55001334
None of this matters, the price is still at single digits.

>>55001355
You dont matter. You were probably a mistake.

>>55001402
nice fud fuddie they are not sending their best frens

ok but why would this affect price?

>>55000680
It isn't that simple. There is a lot of confusion between SETL, DAML, Open blockchain networks, private networks, necessity of Oracles in enterprise walled gardens...

Just because you are slightly familiar with some vernacular and say "FUD" doesn't give you any credence. Try harder if you want anyone to believe you, because if we really knew then we'd be screaming it from the roof tops. We don't even know what capacity Link could be integrated into Canton Network if at all.

>>55000272
Ah yes, some retarded bagholders with confirmation bias and insane sunken cost copium bags found the secret asset that will 1000x from this integration, but the hundreds or thousands of people involved in it, from dozens of banks and institutions, they're all sleeping on the magical erc 20 meme token.

>>55000680
>>55001499
can someone make a dependency chart showing how chianlink fits in?

>>55001462
>fud fuddie
good one faggot

>>55000948
>>55001334
Brainlet here. What's the significance of this dude?

>>55001547

>>55001562
indaresting.

god you linkies are fucking hopless. More and evidence proving your shit was all a lie keeps coming out and you are still digging into where the connections may lie. You are skipping over the obvious huge connections here. There is a single entity that each of the companies listed here have in common. Stop fighting it and get your fucking bags.

>>55001572
Well according to this dude, its nothing. >>55001355

and you wonder why you get fud, shitting up the board again with this dumb link shit. you will continue to get bombarded by professional fud teams from discord and telegram. they control link's price idiot if you cant see that. when the fud comes the price tanks its correlated. quit the excessive shilling or the price will sink

>>55001562
Look how overweight this guy is dealing with 1% financial execs. Fucking embarrassing

>>55001334
>>55001499
Yes, T+1 or T+0 transactions have NOTHING to do with Chainlink or its services. I don't know why you guys keep barfing up bank settlements with Chainlink. And yes, Corda severed ties with Chainlink 3 weeks ago.

>>55001606
I always find unreasonable fud bullish

>>55001686
source on corda severing ties? if thats true linkies really btfo kek

>>55001691
how bout this?

>>55001686
>T+1 or T+0 transactions have NOTHING to do with Chainlink
>Look how overweight this guy is
>Corda severed ties with Chainlink 3 weeks ago.

>Ah yes, some retarded bagholders with confirmation bias and insane sunken cost copium bags found the secret asset that will 1000x from this integration, but the hundreds or thousands of people involved in it, from dozens of banks and institutions, they're all sleeping on the magical erc 20 meme token.

yes.

>>55001735
>a declaration without argumentation
>irrelevant and a red flag on your part for posting it
>an unsourced declaration
Not a great start but I'm sure you'll pick up the slack in your subsequent posts.

>>55000419
Even if Sergey has given or will give some links to the banks....how do you explain the token price not increasing given that hundreds of well paid developers and executives are working on this integration? Why are they not buying and moving up the price?

>>55001686
its the other way around
those financial execs have the privilege to deal with him
look at how this Ernfeld man looks at him with disgust.
Its not because of the weight but because he knows that man is going to end all their fuckery.

>>55000419
if it wasnt true do you think the team would say so? Look at how they handled iso2002. they knew the whole time and didnt correct it

>>55001725
They haven't publicized it, but if you know where to look, the documentation and technical docs show it was replaced in April.

>>55001861
just post it

>>55002011
Search archives for SETL and Canton Network then try to figure out if any of Sergey's partners are in Canton Network. There really isn't much to go off right now.

>>55001499

Canton Network has absolutely nothing to do with this and neither do the other things you mentioned you Bangladeshi retard

> just because you are slightly familiar with some vernacular...

pot calling the kettle black, you have no idea what youre talking about AT ALL, you "walled garden" variety faggot

>>55001861
>but if you know where to look
Sounds like you dont know.

>>55002051
BNY Melon among others are involved in Canton Network, and it isn't my problem that your memory spans no more than a few weeks of shitposts or that you are too mentally lazy to use the biz archives to search these keywords for those lengthy discussions.

Your literal retardation is an open secret, anon.

pathetic stinkies

>>55000272
I wonder when this goes live then? Would appear that it'll be when CCIP is released.
Big moves in the pipeline. Any day now.

>>55000272
I feel like a lot of the LINK community are brainlets that feel big brained due to being spoon fed by big brain LINK marines.

LINK is not every single thing that requires DLT. It’s really clear that they are involved as a key oracle and interoperability player between DLTs for these organizations, but that’s it.

A lot of you idiots are turning into cripple retards with looking for key terms you don’t understand and immediately tie it to LINK.

That being said, I do look forward to a decathousand dollar link by 2030.

>>55001672
nice low iq post by a discord loser who has never made any money, only lost money in crypto

>>55002314
This is definitely tied to Link though. And you know it.

>>55002336
no it isn't stinkie
ctrl-f chainlink
0 results

>>55002336
Explain specifically how any one of the key LINK features is indicated by the feature set defined in the SWIFT article.

LINK is easily the biggest financial market value capture play in human history, but you brainlets are the worst.

You’re like XRP fags who see ISO standards and automatically assume there’s a massive involvement in every single product released by institutions.

Again, I’ll reiterate, LINK imo will be $10,000 or more by 2027.

strg + f "chainlink"
5 results

>>55002388
Yes. LINK is key infrastructure.
Now stop tying it to every fucking product these entities are building in their R&D departments like empty headed moon boys.

>>55002359
>Again, I’ll reiterate, LINK imo will be $10,000 or more by 2027.
you're just as dumb as those other stinkies, stanky boy

>>55002416
More than likely I am.
Which is why I prefer to not be consumed by my own delusions, and stay grounded by reading in detail where possibly LINK has a role, and then wait for confirmation whether directly stating involvement or a description which matches the infrastructural feature set LINK offers.

Stay grounded, or when your delusions come to pass as just that, your hand will weaken and you will sell your once in a lifetime opportunity to become filthy rich.

>>55002359
Agreed. This is pivotal stuff from Swift in terms of Chainlink advancement towards our goal. This is another great chunk being pulled away from the dam that is holding back the flood. Could be days or weeks now. Might even be months, but my gut tells me it's imminent.
WAGMI fren

>>55002401
it's all moving to blockchain. that means it all has the option for, if not necessity to - use link as a solution for various problems(CCIP, DECO, FSS, OCR)

>>55002467
Incorrect. Everything is not moving to blockchain.

Internal software infrastructure is resilient as fuck. Kafka, high throughput high replication databases, private key signing infrastructure, scalable servers, are all not going away.

It seems you don’t pay attention to Sergey.

Blockchain is for immutable guarantees and tokenization. Web 2 is going no where.

As Sergey said in more or less words, the “blockchain stuff” adapter is what’s needed in key places in existing infrastructure. There is no intention to move everything to a blockchain, private nor public.

It’s like you guys don’t even care about what Sergey says, and follow your own hard ons in any direction it points.

>>55002467
>it's all moving to blockchain
It's all about the blockchain and the Link project will take the lion's share of the prize. The nolinkers will smell the coffee after it's too late to wake up. We've led them up the primrose path but you can only lead a horse to water so many times. It's time for us to let go of the reigns i think

>>55002535
Please do some critical thinking. You people make LINK look stupid to otherwise intelligent people who would’ve discovered the massive monolithic giant that is LINK.

Yes, LINK will be the most valuable digital asset, if not generic asset, in the history of humankind.
>>55002499

>>55002499
>It seems you don’t pay attention to Sergey.
>Blockchain is for immutable guarantees and tokenization. Web 2 is going no where.

What is Chainlink Functions, nigger

>>55002566
Critical thinking is the order of the day, my friend. I understand peeps feeling emotional about the project (after all it's been a long ride!) but one need only read the texts like OP pic and it's plain as the nose on your face we're going to the top of the tree. Now ain't the time to be feeling weak. Stay strong and you'll make it, my friend. Just keep thinking 'Link is my token'. Worked for me.

>>55002589
Do you understand that that in itself is DevOps for the blockchain, similar to keepers?

The parallel between something like AWS CloudWatch for event driven architecture in the blockchain world are Chainlink Keepers.

The parallel for serverless compute in the blockchain world is CL Functions.

They are intended infrastructure for the blockchain DevOps and extending the capacity of blockchains.

They are not replacing web 2 parallels, they are creating the corresponding DevOps infrastructure for the blockchain use cases.

>>55001603
>its gunna be EGGS ARE PEEEE
back to your containment thread faggot

>>55001802
Ernfield is absolutely obsessed with Sergey and Chainlink and this is blatantly obvious if you watch the fireside chat. But you already know that, you just don’t want newfags to learn.

>>55002632
I have a strong feeling a lot of you love LINK as much as I do and believe in its financial growth being parabolic as I do as well, but what you brainlets are seeing are the shadows on the wall of what’s happening, rather than what’s happening.

Really, you’ll end up in the same financial bucket as me, but for the wrong reasons. The only peril with looking at shadows rather than reality is that you are more likely to be disheartened when your shadows mislead you.

>>55002659
you are a fucking pretentious pseud faggot

>>55002659
Try to stay strong. The wait can be disheartening but when you've been in this game for as long as some of us, you begin to harden up to anything.
It's coming soon, and youll look back on these posts n laff at how naive you seemed. That day is soon.

>>55002681
Have I misled you or lied in anyway?
I see that you’re passionate about LINK.
That is good. The more like minded people that hold this golden goose the better when it comes our turn to change the world in our image.

My only issue is that if you are constantly being misled by hopes of CL involvement in everything, you’ll sell too early.

Like everything here, not everyone who is on biz is right about everything. It is through a beautiful, aggregated, non reputation based idea spreading consensus we reached where we are today in terms of knowledge of the 4iR.

>>55002703
I’m quite certain that LINK is a deca thousand dollar play. I see reading comprehension isn’t your specialty, anon.

The path to glory is oft paved with the struggles of former heroes.
We fly the banner of Chainlink and hold our swords skyward in a show of defiance as all around us mighty dev warriors build a strong fortress. We shall all be Kings in the castle of empowerment. The time is nigh.

>>55002725
>I’m quite certain that LINK is a deca thousand dollar play
It's Deco, anon. And it will use the Link token, the only token which the project uses. No need for multi-tokens. See archives for more info on the Deco function.

>>55002761
What? Do you not understand that deca in this context refers to the dollar amount anticipated by me per LINK token?

baggies btfo my sides

>>55002873
We should make you laugh with threads like these.

In general though, outside of the incorrect thought processes and assumptions of the brainlet marines in this thread, LINK will very likely be the highest valued digital asset within the decade. But, that’s for you determine yourself.

>>55002806
It's decO, not decA, my friend. Most will know what you mean but it's handy to have the correct terminology to hand. I think $1000 per deco/link is achievable in the future but you should set your sights on more realistic numbers in the near term. Most of us on this forum are looking at $100 as a good springboard number into the future. Hold those bags tightly and make sure to use cold storage devices, not exchanges, for long term storage.

>>55002921
You’re retarded.
Deca is a prefix used to indicated exponential values of 10, I am clearly saying link will be worth tens of thousands.

DECO, what’s being built by Ari and CLL, is a technology that will require link payments to use.

You’re actually stupid, aren’t you?

>>55002921
I have 6 wallets each ranging between 3-5k LINK. Each use a different modal of security. I’m well prepared.

>>55002959
Whoa! Easy there, big Tiger! Someone needing to take a chill pill. It's common to get these things wrong but it's good you've learned about Deco today so you'll be able to talk about that in upcoming discussions on the subjects. Seriously though, you only need to think about one token and that's the LINK token. Forget about Deco/deca dec-whatever. And buck up on those manners, you're getting proper feisty!
Also, link will likely be thousand or so one day. Ten thousand... well, we'll see!

>>55003008
I understand DECO man, I suggest you re read my posts if you’re misinterpreting me, but that’s on you. I only suggest you re read because you’re engaging posts without understanding the authors intent clearly laid out.

>>55003027
>I understand DECO
Glad i could help. No need to reread the thread. Just go with the flow. Peace, fren.

>>55003074
Meh, just understand that not all topics need to be trolled because you’re bored on an anonymous moose farming forum

>>55003102
Don't apologise. I didn't realise you were trolling. We're all friends here. Just stay with the project. WAGMI

>>55002051
they did sever ties with link. I just wanted to see what he was going to post . Everyone ignored the fact too. It was posted on twatter i think when it happend

All you link bagholders. Why dont you give me a peak cycle price target for link?

>>55000272
Bullish for XRP

>>55002416
Link is either kingmade, the actual future of finance, or nothing. Thats why every shred of actual evidence of its usage drives people who know into a fervor.

>>55001686
yes confirmed here that chainlink doesn't have ties with corda:
https://www.vdigitalassetbroker.com/

>>55003809
>https://www.vdigitalassetbroker.com/
the way the chainlink logo is hidden offscreen and pops in gets me every time

>>55003809
how so?

>>55003886
KEK i forgot about it untill i scrolled all the way down

>>55000457
I think you're being tongue in cheek, but for the newfags it's
>revelation of the method

>>55000782
We know m8. We know. It's just been a long road.

Just worked with DTCC and they mentioned central banks using digital assets a lot

>>55003501
$8 in 2025

>>55003903
Blockchains need an oracle. Chainlink is the only Oracle listed there. Corda uses chainlink.

>>55004333
doesn't mean they are using chainlink. could just be there as an example of an oracle

Hello niggers, im from the future 100k per token, niggers tongue my anus

>>55003886
They could have easily fit all 5 logos. Fucking lol

>>55004340
wow that's so true, thanks for the critical thinking anon

>>55004352
Reported this comment to the myspace content moderators

Theyre deleting threads now.

https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights49.pdf

CRTL + F + chainlink
CRTL + F + oracles

>>55004571
this is retarded, why are the so secretive

>>55004571
>>55004578
they're just deleting content their userbase is sick of

The only problem with link is it didn't have a proper speculative pump relative to everything else. It's really the biggest problem that has driven years of negative sentiment.

If you've worked in big business with government, law, or banking then you'd know how glacial these firms are. I knew this would be a very long hold way back in early 2018 since the law firm I was working at was just starting to educate the wider firm about the basics of block chain/bitcoin. Like baby basics. I'd actually argue links feature stack has been quite fast. Only a few years ago we weren't discussing DECO, CCIP etc.

I was totally blindsided that this would be the only forum discussing actually important tech 6 years later and the price would go nowhere and for the last few years lose its spot to doge coin, a Chinese centralised copy of eth and a copy of doge coin on the copy eth. Most of us saw the market being illogical but felt link hadn't moved at all (once again only relatively to the scams) you can argue you shouldn't marry your investment and take profits and cut your losers early and all standard stock advice but I'd rather leave link alone and only add to it over time with new dollars as I believe this is the safest strategy for this particular investment.

Basically DR:NS

>>55001547
Kek dude you're way behind. But seriously, does anyone even seriously think the oracle problem can even be solved.

>>55002499
>>55002611
checked. finally an anon that isnt bob4punk, chainlinkgod, linkdrake, or any of those other low IQ mouth breathers
Note that this reasonable yet bullish assessment of Chainlink will not be reshared on Twitter. Really makes you think

>>55004666
shut up, stinkie satan

>>55004666
you're the one listing twitter celebrities you stupid faggot, imagine even knowing who any of those cunts are outside chainlinkgod who we have to hear about here 10x a day for some reason.

>>55004739
these people are FAMOUS you ABSOLUTE MORAN you should SHUT THE FUCK UP and LISTEN to their TYPED WORDS on TWITTER because ONLY A MORAN would ignore BASED FAMOUS PEOPLE

Remember the old Chainlinkgod adage
>be based when others are cringe
>be cringe when others are based
This is how you separate the wheat from the calf moran

>>55004655
There is wealthy and strong entities that would rather link to fail.

>>55000782
People are tired and have begun to live their lives outside of the cube.

>>55004820
MEV mafia are like the first level boss. If Chainlink can't take down a little cartel of Ethereum grifters then they don't have a chance against the tradfi behemoths they will inevitably face later on.

>>55004847
It’s all of the major vc’s. Plus eth if’s plus a couple other I can’t think off. The whole eth ecosystem is against Sergey. Whixh is a major issue if the experts who have important peoples ears want oracleless protocols

>>55004917
Those "oracleless" products literally just outsource oracle selection to the user. Honestly an embarrassment that they came up with that.

>>55004917
Oracle-less protocols is a lie XD. They say the user, the people they are robbing, will have the forsighté to choose which oracle provider to use and Chainlink controls 98% of the oracle market now so which one do you think the user will pick?

>>55004946
woah insane hivemind activity itt breadie good anon
seriously what a marketing scam all those vc grifts are. and everyone tried to frontrun the ccip announcement. We would have CCIP if it wasn't for those grifters.
Why don't the ETH Foundation every sponsor a Chainlink event. Chainlink sponsor them and ETH need Chainlink

>>55002921
Amusing bait. It is bait.. isn't it?

>>55001512
bump for this

>utility token is being white labeled and used by "enterprise" customers
Why do you care to prove it? Either way it should be bullish no?

>>55005296
why does it have to be "proven"? crypto pumps fine just fine without any proof needed LMAO U MAD?

>>55004946
>>55004949
It doesn’t matter. The people who have a say so will just say it’s not needed. You missed my point

>>55005417
Trusting experts gets you a lethal COVID vaccine and YOU GOT LOCKED DOWN FOR NO GOOD REASON fucking retard MORAN

>>55004820
I think when the technology is this close to fruition and with the players backing link it's unlikely. If it fails and such a system maybe won't appear until a few decades down the track. I think most know this system is inevitable and are just trying to squeeze out the last drops. I don't think MEV is that big anyway but its destruction is necessary for the truly big players to join.

I actually have seen first hand technologies failed to be adopted purely due to the inventors being unreasonable. And that was a really, really big upgrade to then current process. So I'm not a total stranger to seeing defeat snatched from the jaws of victory for the most ridiculous of reasons.

>>55000389
That's what I don't get. Retail thinks he can outsmart insiders.
Longs on grain started months before the Ukraine war. Not one single media reported. Really makes you think.

>>55001334
somebody post the t+1 pasta

>>55005516
Agrarian societies were some of the first centralized societies. Grain is easy to tax because they stand up right and the tax jew can calculate area and tax accordingly. Not so with hunter gatherer decentralized societies. anarchist HGs also favored freedom of movement something state based societies regulate. Grain also allows you to make beer which the npc masses adore. You can see how grain is critical to centralized societies even in the modern world

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oue-D3YR_DY

>>55005863
>partner/connector
>hexagon shaped
BIG

>>55005863
this is exactly how the swift guy explained it at smartcon last year. smartcon of course is the smartest gathering of con men the world has ever seen so maybe they are just joking lol?

>>55005946
>DUDE DUDE MY BREADCRUMBS
>DUDE DUDE BREADCRUMBS
>MYYYYY BREEADCRRRRRUUUMMMBSSS
do you have any idea how ridiculous you look right now

>>55005976
less ridiculous than you look wearing pants. I am wearing no pants at the moment anon.

how does this make you feel?

>>55005976

>>55005988
I feel silly wearing pants now

>>55005456
you are still missing the fucking point. The narrative is that oracels is bad. Does eth control the narrative or does retail?

im tired of pretending that i like pants

>>55005863
Can you link to source fren

>>55005988
checked and nopantspilled

>>55000272
>Dinosaur Merchant Bank
Kek, what a joke

>>55005863
why don’t they name it

>>55000457
They are absolving themselves from karmatic debt. They essentially told you HEY RETARD GOY HERE THIS IS THE LOTTERY TICKET THIS IS THE ESCAPE FROM WAGE SLAVERY BUT YOUR LITTLE CATTLE BRAIN JUST DOESNT GET IT HAHAHAHHA DUMB FUCKING GOY, WE TOLD YOU :^)

>>55001769
maybe they already did

>>55002499
>Blockchain is for immutable guarantees and tokenization. Web 2 is going no where.
this should be basic knowledge for all linkmuhrines

>>55005863
Wagmi