/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54969838
$200 seems like a low estimate this cycle but I'll likely sell there so it can go to $500 for the rest of you

>>54969838
No. What? No.
We're only going to blast to $1k EOY, no further.

the bitcoin top has been cemented in 2020, so make sure to take that into account when calculating the maximum possible upside

>>54969838
i'm laddering my sells up to $200. part of me feels like we will go even higher but fuck it i can't afford to put my real life on hold any longer. i'll still have my 7k staked so i won't completely miss out at least.

>>54969838
When normies realize how much BUILD makes APY on staking LINK it will go parabolic it won’t even matter that CCIP takes over all of blockchain it’ll literally just be retail flooding in thinking they’re going to get rich from airdrops. And the craziest part is those who are early enough actually will.

airdrops and dilutive staking, 6 years, lol

>>54969886
>>54969861
Why is $200 everyones max prediction? I think that it can hit $500.

can it just hurry up though? i wanna retire to a little shack on acreage somewhere where nobody will ever bother me again already
im so tired of waiting

>>54969980
you'd need bitcoin to be nearly 1 million dollars
do you think that's realistic in the next 10 years?

don't forget altcoins don't control their fiat prices, bitcoin does.

>>54969980
10x previous "real" ath of $20, 1000x atl of $0.2, clean 100b mcap, ranking would be 3rd but still far from eth. while i do think link will go far beyond $500 one day im not counting on it next cycle. for link to challenge eth or btc for mcap it would require substantial real world adoption and i dont think thats coming anytime soon.

>>54969838
>>54969861>>54969980

I wish I had your confidence anons, I’m at the lowest I’ve ever been

>>54969838
u've been feeling this for 7 years, while ur coin is down 99% vs eth

>>54969875
>>54970019
demoralization nonsense. just like the BTC top was "cemented" in 2018

>>54970679
idk anon, with rudimentary staking already being out, BUILD drops, CCIP coming any day now, functions, big inflation happening worldwide I think $500 link is a definite possibility. there's a ton of inflation money on the sidelines now that hasnt gone to crypto yet

>>54970758

>>54970780
Is there a way we can bet on this?
I think it's very reasonable to think that was the hype cycle peak during defi summer. 2018 is not comparable for obvious reasons.
In 2020 the possibilities were endless and the peak reflected that.
But now we're three years post defi summer, and we're at a point where reality trumps hype and speculation.
I think it's extremely unlikely we see a new LINK BTC or ETH high in our lifetimes at this point.
I think for the most part things have been under delivered in terms of what was promised with a DON, but in the end the product and company are good enough, and in the end what we got is good enough to do the job. It's not bad and does what it says on the tin more or less.
Monetization is happening and the market will readjust based on the fundamentals and such, but crypto wise it's a mature project. Most of the excess value comes from exploiting the cognitive biases of people when they get caught up in the 'unlimited possibilities' stage.
But we're not in that stage anymore, and that's ok. It's still a successful company and product.

I still actually blows my mind that LINK was a top 5 coin.
Honestly, old /biz/ did a phenomenal job of hyping and creating the 'unlimited possibilities' meme, and having it penetrate the wider crypto-sphere.
I don't know if the older people who had that talent sold, or moved on, or what happened. But /biz/ for the most part now is just pure misery. Hard to sell people a dream when you look here for five minutes and the impression ones gets is one of pain and suffering.

>>54970780
No, because in 2018 link hadn't pumped

go check any chart and you'll notice huge pumps only occur against btc once for alts. do you intend to have musk start shilling your premined bags? no? then link topped in 2020.

It was the sixth coin in coin market cap, it peaked, that was its top.

>>54970894
>>54970940
it was just defi summer combined with a large chunk of the premine being counted that pushed it so high in the rank.

same story, different alt. high expectations meets reality and it never goes that high again.

>>54970961
>>54970940
To add, if it wasn't shilled by so many here, more people wouldn't have held their bags through that one-time top. 1000 eoy memes literally psyopped these guys into holding something that was way overvalued relative to the market, and the weakest of the bunch are still holding it.

It's interesting from a psychological perspective because anybody that uses alts to increase their own wealth needs an understanding of how these insular communities work. Something like link was ripe for such a pump and dump because it attracted the exact lifelong bagholder type that allows these things to happen.

Always worth looking out for new/not-pumped alts that exhibit the same kind of rabid emotional behavior because they're usually the ones that go the furthest in their blow off cycles.

It's so fucking funny thinking link was a long shot with breadcrumbs in 17 and 18. Now it's at 1000 employees with the absolute creme de la creme of comp Sci brains working on it, controls the entirety of defi and got eric Schmidt to shill it with not just one product but an entire suite of game changing products (blah blah vapourware cry more faggot) and has zero competition.

I'm also really glad that at any hour of the day for years on end I can come to this board and have so many anons deeply care about my investment strategy so much so that it makes them angry. I've been sat at the table holding my cards patiently. I'm all in. Sorry lads I'm not folding.

>>54971073
In other words, like all alts, 90% of the gains were made from insiders/floor buyers in those early years. Now it's emerged and reality smacked it in the face, returns will be at market or below market average from here on out.

If you made money in this market instead of holding one bag for life you'd know this, though.

>>54970955
>>54971097
>huge pumps only occur against btc once for alts
>returns will be at market or below market average from here on out.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction

>>54970940
You weren't here for 2018 were you

>>54969838
I've been feeling it for a few months now. We are definitely nearing that point. I keep having to remind myself I'm still up by a lot and this isn't over, but the regret of not selling all my link 2 years ago and retiring is sometimes too much.
I hate charts. Never want to see a number going up and down again in my life. I just want out but I know it's not time yet.
But looking at the charts, we might go a bit lower first. Might be $4 or even 3. I know I can survive it but I will probably have some self-destructive tendencies return and just feel like shit until we're back.
Please Sergey, let me live already.

>>54971224

>>54970679
Im holding mine till 2040 at earliest. Will just see how it runs. Plan to retire that year so well see what we got there.

>>54970955
plain wrong. There are several old shitcoins who had large speculative pumps against BTC and came back again, case in point Cardano, which is still a ghostchain vapourware piece of shit. All it takes is CCIP gaining steam and the L0 interoperability narrative taking hold off the normie crypto zeitgeist and we are heading straight to #3

>>54969838
Actual insider here. I think this needs some clarification because Link marines have been waiting for so long now and have been extremely patient. I can't really tell you too much because Chainlink Labs employees actually lurk biz (and post here) so they might able to know who I am. There has been an unexpected temporary delay of CCIP due to the upgraded off-chain computation protocols (OCR 2.0) that had an unforeseen malfunction. However, the DONs seem to be fully online therefore the problem will be resolved quite rapidly.

In regards to SWIFT they actually seem to be keen on launching CCIP already by June. The main problem is that the network across EVM and non-EVM chains hasn't been fully tested to maximum capacity therefore releasing a product in such a short time would be quite a gamble for us. I'm confident enough that we'll be able to maintain a standardized interface to control the minimalization protocol for the off-chain computation of the blockchain thus rendering the entire Chainlink ecosystem fully secured. At this rate I can only tell you that CCIP will happen before november, that's a certainty.

Strap yourselves in
It’s actually happening

>>54971728
Are you releasing a fully fledged version of CCIP or will it be a 0.1 version like staking? What's the rollout looking like for that and what will CCIP look like for the end user to interface with.

>>54970940
It was the smart money play at the time. It can get back there pretty easily though.

>>54971728
You should run this through GPT4 and get it to rewrite it as if it was written by a professional adult.
Not terrible, but could be a lot better.

>>54970940
>>54970894
ehhh.... i rate this fud 2/10
2 points because you tried to be original, but overall, it sucks. Nobody will read that whole wall of text, and halfway in it becomes obvious that you don't understand a word of what you wrote. Even worse is the gay and whiney tone of your writing. I understand that you *wanted* to sound sympathetic and demoralizing, but you failed utterly. This is an absolutely shameful post anon. I'm subtracting 1 shekel from your account

>>54971771
Haha, you know the answer to this…

Ive been here for years and dont feel nor expect anything. Link will simply trail the market as it always does. It will pump slightly less when everything else goes up, and dump slightly more on pullbacks.

The team will keep holding the carrot for you, but more and more of you are waking up to the grift. By this time next year you’ll be in full desperation mode, no longer able to live the lie.

There is no CCIP. Hilarious yet sad theres people expecting something “soon”. They hadnt even started creating it last year when Sergey announced its release. Thats the kind of sociopath you invested in. To guys like him, SBF, Machinsky, this is all just a board game. You are the pawns.

>>54972230
>calls reality fud
>calls other person emotional after a rational analysis
>your opinions end where my cult begins

>>54972374
this fud also gets a 2/10. I cannot give any points for originality, but the good ol' cult fud is enough for 2 points. Overall, another dismal effort that's much more an attempt at demoralization and ad hominem rather than true FUD.

I hope you're happy with your score (2/10 is a 20%- you need to triple your score just to get a D-). Maybe you can get your GED before 25? By the way, I bought a few hundred more linkies a couple days ago. It's immaterial to my portfolio but I just can't resist clicking buy when I think about your seething.

>>54971303
cardano never made a new high against bitcoin, fyi

>>54969838
>>54969861
>>54969865
>>54969875
>>54969886
>>54969929

2 more weeks, marines

Look, LINK is my biggest holding, but I can't take the crabbing any longer. Someone hit me with some weapons-grade hopium.

>>54969946
>>54970758
>>54970894
>>54970940
>>54970955
>>54970961
>>54970985
>>54971097
>>54972356
>>54972374
>>54972719
sorry guys
i can tell a lot of work seems to be going into fudding chainlink (ticker: LINK) at the moment, probably the equivalent to a full time job per person but... it has all been a waste
i wont be selling any chainlink tokens (ticker: LINK)

>>54969838
Honestly? No, not at all. Would love that, but I’ve resigned myself to crab and slow grind up eventually once the token is capturing value.

>>54969838
Chain link is too mainstream now. You need to find low caps with potential. Like POOL.

>>54969865
I used to do this for increased mobility and APM back when I played starcraft a couple decades ago. It seems harmless at the time but it really fucks you up later in life with weird feeling almost calloused clumps of skin. Not painful but they never go away and some activities like typing make them impossible to ignore.

>>54972956
you shouldn't sell. best case scenario is that you continue to hold while getting made fun of all the way to sub $1

>>54972612
>calls someone else unoriginal
>then does the hurrr hurrr bought more Gamestop schtick from 2021.

yikes

>>54973443
>you shouldn't sell
Is the fud all being posted to convince contrarian anons that they shouldn't sell?

>>54973462
1 single solitary point out of 10
anon i am begging you, go back and finish your GED. Even earning $10/hour at a McJob is better than making all of these posts... for free.

Yea but not until summer is over at least. My guess is end of 2023/beginning of 2024

>>54973663
in your opinion what is some 10/10 chainlink FUD?

>>54973790
token not needed

>>54972982
If it's not a privacy or zkp project, it's shit.

>>54974379
Nah, third category is: easy to use for plebbits.

>>54973790
The same behavior as a GME baggie. Nothing makes me want to sell more than seeing normie coping and stale memes. I almost didnt want to tell you incase the fudders start posting diamond hands/ ape shit.

>>54973790
10/10 chainlink fud is that blockchain technology will never be adopted mainstream. Serious, that is the best fud, because chainlink has already positioned itself that if the technology ever sees widespread adoption, they have a massive moat for oracles.

Alternatively, 8/10 fud is blockchain tech will see mainstream adoption but it is 10+ years away. Because nobody is going to be able to look at the casino that is crypto and be comfortable with another decade of waiting, even if that would make a fantastic traditional investment.

>>54974433
checked
this sort of thing is 5/10 fud at best, only makes a difference if you see it widespread irl. now if I heard a nigger at the gas station talking about chainlink, that's 10/10 fud, but some autists on 4chan posing as a gme baggie doesn't mean shit.

>>54969838

Yeah. It's the only serious project in crypto at the moment. There are other serious projects I guess, but they are way farther from delivery and solve problems much narrower in scope - and also these other projects generally require Chainlink anyways, making me more bullish on STINKY LINKIES.

Who are the fudders even trying to get to at this point? There's nobody left on this board who would sell from the lame fud they're coming up with these days. Either Link goes to 0 when the government fucks crypto or Link goes sky high at some point.

>>54973790
2 man team, price of a cup of coffee, shadowfork, nail salon, jason parser, etc

>>54974467
The plan swift has is not going anywhere. Even if many crypto initiatives don’t stick, Chainlink will still do well. The other “unlikely” to fail vector for me is ai.
Tweet related:
https://twitter.com/meetthepress/status/1658087797167738883

>>54974663
Its the same mentality shazaam posters on /v/ have, this site is founded by autists talking about obscure shit they enjoy, and they are ultra paranoid about it getting popular and being ruined, it was the basis of rules 1 and 2, there is a meme that displays this accurately (image related), and if they are that paranoid about it with things like anime and vidya, imagine how you'd feel if your entire net worth and financial future depended on it.

>>54971771
>>54971728
two more weeks! keep hodling! this time it'll def pump!

>>54970955
What are you holding

>>54975001
He's holding chainlink. We all are, just some of us don't want (you) to be holding it.

>>54973217
I got rid of callouses on my little toe with iodine.
Yours sounds more like scar tissue though.
What fucking possessed you?

>>54969875
This. The only people left holding LINK are newfags or literal mouthbreathers that don't know how alts work

>>54975134
>LINK is just like every other scam coin!
Why do you think this is anything above room temp IQ fud? The reason all the alts from 2017 disappeared when LINK persevered and is still a top token is because they all did nothing whereas LINK enables almost all the current usefulness in blockchain. It has already proven it will outlast. Literally BTC, ETH, LINK, XRP are the ONLY things which have proven they’re here to stay. One of these had a much smaller mcap than the others making it a way better investment for gain multipliers.

You could maybe argue LTC and BCH have had some staying power but they’re both just in a slow death spiral currently.

Then there is DOGE which I think we can all agree dies the very second fundamentals start to rule the market.

>>54975134
Chainlink is not like other alts though. I think it’s still going to take a while, but once the token is capturing value, its
Price will rise.

>>54969838
even though I think it's pure hopium to think this way, link's trader grade according to tokenmetrics seems a bit high.

we could see a gradual and consistent climb up

>>54975019
I don't, so what's your point

>>54975255
>LINK is just like every other scam coin!
I didn't say it is.

Even ETH couldn't reach it's previous peak in satoshis. And LINK is a weaker bluechip than Ethereum.

>>54975256
ETH is not like other alts either. It's still putting in lower highs against BTC. Look at the charts.

>>54969838
yeah everybody on this board for the last two years by now kek

>>54973790
toilets

>>54975001
Link ofc, you'd be retarded not to be taking advantage of these prices

I also have some arb vela and ride as low cap bags

>>54975452
I’m just too poor so I’m not sure if such a high cap coin is worth it. I’m getting back to crypto so I’m paying more attention again.
I know LINK did well in bear markets though it was underwhelming in the bull market.
So I’m either thinking between PNK as it’s an interesting project at low price now, and low mcap, XCM, UOS, XMR or LINK.

>>54975452
I’ll look into those

>>54971146
I'm in the same boat, and I really try to imagine that I'm holding 30,000 shares of AMZN through the 90's and 00's instead of link tokens.
I've put so much effort into educating myself about what Link is doing, and I've tried to be as neutral as possible about the future.
I'm willing to bet my future that Link is going to be worth thousands of dollars in the next decade, and when that happens, I'll be glad to look back at the struggle of holding during these bear markets.

Really, is there anything that points to CL not working toward being the most essential part of a decentralized banking/financial landscape?
We have every major financial institution and government finally admitting that blockchain is going to have a significant place in how we express value, and Chainlink is the only serious company/crypto entity that is working toward facilitating that.

I've got a few hundred thousand right now in Link tokens, which is a serious amount of money. I'd be a fool to be flippant with that amount of money and not be patient with the pace a multi billion dollar company is progressing with technology that will affect the movement of hundreds of trillions of dollars.

>>54975515
It's simple, if you don't have much to invest, then you should stick with mid to low cap coins

>>54975452
What happened to all the audi hype holoride had?

>>54975335
It only makes sense to keep to DCA at this point. Personally I'm done with link.

Pic related: what analytic platform are you using?

>>54976049
>in the next decade

Is there any hope for me with my 2k stack? Im pretty much just retarded and bought the full stack years ago at like $4 each or something.

>>54976132
Hasn't really lived up to it when you look at the charts but off it, they've been delivering with the product

>>54974936
You really wish anon, you wish

>>54976187
Looks like tokenmetrics, been using it for a while now and it's quite effective since it uses AI

>>54976049
>he fell for the altcoin meme
>he doesn't know altcoins only have 1 hype cycle
anon I...

>>54976795
Forget to switch ID's retard?

>>54969838
I've been feeling it since 2018, but the market has been so much slower to understand it than I expected.
Oh well, I get it. Nobody at my work has done literally anything in the past year, so I can't expect big banks to operate any faster. They can't just switch over to something like this straight away, even if they understood it correctly to begin with.

am I in this alone?

>>54976795
>>54977003
Jesus Christ the state of /biz/

>>54976710
We're in that era where literally everything is becoming ai powered
Now we have them reading chats and giving indicators

>>54976628
Waiting to see how much positives comes out of the roadmap updates for the year, incentives for users could be bullish

>>54974873
accept in financial situations every added person increases the value no matter how retarded they are
no the only plausible explanation ever offered is that these are completely buckbroken anons that lost their stacks in any of the cefi blow ups last year and whose only shred of hanging on to this life is that they didnt miss out and link was going nowhere anyways
if you have been here for mroe than 2 years you know all the big stacked anons who where talking about how much yield they got on celsius and how they ignored all warnings about how yield must drop in the bear because number on their closed app went up
just imaging how insane these people must have become last year

>>54977318
why is the insider fudding his coin?

>>54977617
Linkies have fudding their own coins since forever, it keeps LINK on the front page of /biz/

>>54973663
Projection (again). You love going to the well. I made $175k last year, this year going over 2. You?

>>54974467
If, should, eventually. The ode of the -95% bagholder. 30 more years

>>54974572
>serious project
>hamburger meetup event, sponsored by a dog coin

Choose one

>>54974663
Le conspiracy right? Sheer delusion

>>54974873
>We want to get rich off our investment, but also want it to be le secret.
>no one buys it, price tanks

Ive never understood this one

>>54975019
>le secret autist hold

Cringe

>>54975255
That last sentence is so sad. You’ll still be here in 2028 saying Doge is almost dead, while it still has a substantially higher mcap than Link.

>>54975515
>bear markets

Correction, bear market. It did well once. Like most alts, it got its one run. Now as a dead alt its at the mercy on BTC. This isnt a hard concept…

>>54976049
Just because underlying technology is changing, doesnt mean a random altcoin will moon. Somewhere along the line the cultists here missed that part.

>>54977475
>roadmap

Bahahaha…what is this, 2019? Who knows, maybe you guys will get a small mention of a test version of some buzz words at smartcon ‘24 though.

>>54970894
not sure if just low iq post or high iq fud.

>>54970894
>Is there a way we can bet on this?

very easily. Write up a contract that checks the ETH price or whichever one you choose. Both of you put in X amount of money you bet, and the contract will award the monies to whoever bet the price will pass the previous historical ATH, if not, the contract will award the guy who said the top already passed in 60 years.

>>54978177
This has to be the saddest comment I've ever seen on biz
Holy hell why do you care so much?

>>54978567
because he holds link. They all do, its always the same story, "no I just am sick of you shitting up the board, no I just love to laugh at cuckolds" blah blah they all hold link.

>>54978647
why does ETH never get this level of vitriol and scrutiny despite failing more in its objectives than chainlink? Puzzling to me since /biz/ was an ETH board when it launched.

>>54978692
because the catalog isn't being shit up with 10+ ETH threads every hour

>>54978897
>because the catalog isn't being shit up with 10+ ETH threads every hour

To be fair 8 out of 10 of those LINK threads are literally just FUD threads. Its been like this for months. There are a couple discussing LINK and then the rest are "Sergey betray" or "You are a cuck if you hold LINK"

Shouldn't the question be who the fuck is making this purposely useless and annoying threads? Its not the holders of LINK.

>>54979898
yes it is, cuck. Now stop shilling this shitcoin on biz and getting everyone to lose their money

>>54977540
Fucking retards were acting so smug too. So glad I waited for real staking.

I fear we will blast so hard that we will overshoot the mark and end up in a ditch.

This thread hasn’t aged well.

>>54979898
Youre projecting confidence but its a front. In your free time you choose to larp as a private investigator on a basket weaving thread, determined to get to the bottom of the “real” cause of le larp threads. Youve been humbled, and youre no better than anyone else here. Hubris is your downfall. Take it like a man

>>54980095
Le fud threads*

>>54979919
HOLY NEWFAG. Crypto is about losing money to insiders

>>54979919

Its not and I made a lot from LINK. Its easily the best risk/reward ratio in crypto. If blockchain is to succeed, with smart contracts becoming the prominent form of digital agreements for institutional level users, then oracles must also succeed. Its the next and most obvious progression for the space to evolve appropriately.

Buy or don't buy Idc nor does anyone else who holds LINK.

>>54977540
That’s sad.
Ironically we told them to not sell but not trust those services. Especially after the whole nexo scandal.

>>54980095
>In your free time

I have a lot of that these days most because of LINK. Again its all just personal insults and no real discussion from you people.

Of course I'm projecting confidence. I know the project will be successful in completing what they set out to achieve. I hold a lot of LINK and didn't even buy until almost a year after in depth research about the project. 2018 holder and I found LINK at ICO. Everyone was talking about layer 1s, layer 2s, and scaling. It made no sense to me. It was obvious oracles were an absolute must for crypto so why randomly choose an actual blockchain token when I could just buy the only project building the next phase of crypto after scaling was solved?

Why are there dozens of pointless FUD threads going at the same time that all say the same thing. Its just weird.

>>54969929
Minecraft yourself you delusional newfag FUCK. Normies will fomo into complete lowcap dogshit while team dumps and manipulation keep us between $40-$60 again. Literally look at Pepe, that is the next bullrun, a zillion of those literal scams where people don’t even pretend to be value investing and are openly playing musical chairs.

>>54980208
based and pill pilled

>>54969838
>Anyone else feeling that we are about to blast way farther than anyone expects.
No, not really. It's fucking 6 dollars. It was 50 dollars 2 years ago. Sometimes when it's in, it's in.

t. 2017 "oldfag"

>>54969838
I havent had feelings like this in about a year

fuck bros. is it time? can you fucking wait please? i have to move in with my parents again first.

im just glad diablo 4 is around the corner so i can completely forget about chainlink for a while

>>54973443
>>54973462
>>54973790
>>54974433
>>54974936
>>54975134
>>54976676
>>54976795
>>54978177
>>54978897
>>54979919
>>54980078
>>54980095
>>54980108
>>54980208
>>54981300
hey thanks for keeping biz a link board by inadvertently bumping this pro link thread with your fud but...
my strategy is to keep accumulating
how does this make you feel?

>>54969838
Nope I feel like thats not going to happen for another year at least to be honest. At least another 6 months in this range.

>>54980114
Biggest flip of Q1 came from altcoinistdao fet alpha pick. Should replicate that with ALTT launch
https://www.altcoinist.com/altt

>farther than anyone expects
>he expects it
Anon I...

>>54969838
I already left this board after 2022, people still stay in this board and even shilling this coin are 100% bagholders

>>54969838
99.7% of my optimism has drained away

>>54983123
>Sergay dumped his fat ballsack stack throughout the bullrun
>He still has 49% of the total amount of LINK tokens to dump on us

Are we going to miss the next bullrun too bros?

>>54983123
the elites are accumulating, just wait and see

>>54970019
I think btc at 1million within 10-15 years is entirely reasonable.

>>54978897
>muh catalog
Why don't you go the fuck outside for 5 minutes

>>54983427
I will never go outside seeth

>>54973790
2017-2018 was time for some powerful fud. Made me doubt Link. Nowadays fud is shit tier

>>54973217
That's some dumb shit anon. Did you ever make it out of gold league?

>>54976049
>I've got a few hundred thousand right now in Link tokens, which is a serious amount of money.
A couple hundred thousand*
Your stick is worth 200k at current prices anon, it’s not a serious amount of money anymore. I respect your longterm thinking and I hope you make it though

>>54980158
>down a Million+ due to cult

Ouch sorry man. Props to you though for staying positive. Its going to be a wild time when guys like you finally come around to the grift. If people think the “fud” is bad now, just wait…

>This is a Link board
but also
>nooo we never spammed the board with link for years, especially when it was a literal who token
but then
>oy vey, why do they persecute us honest linkies so?
you can't have your cake and eat it too. Crazy how false hopium threads en masse are okay but fud threads are evil and clearly paid opposition.

Because you know, the jews are fudding a $3.5b market cap asset class to make sure a few extra retards on a mongolian basket weaving forum are gonna be billionaires and that can't happen. Get a fucking grip

>>54983166
Depends on your definiton of “miss”. You’ll still get dragged up by the market but not nearly as much upside as newer alts. Basically youre taking on incredible risk versus just holding BTC for the same potential gain.

Take a look at the 2021 chart for IOTA for an example of what to expect. It was big 2018 altcoin that many clung onto the following bullrun. Their subreddit still has ~150k subscribed. They also tweet multiple times per day…sound familiar?

>>54970841
congrats on that impressive x3 in more than half a decade.

Still down -95% from your ATH tho

>>54984521
>comparing the protocol securing 80% of the value in blockchain today to a dead & failed experimental layer 1

Either intentionally disingenuous or retarded, I’ll let you say which.

>>54984505
*acquires more chainlink tokens (ticker:link)*
67, to be exact

My esteemed and illustrious Anonymous confidant,

I find myself bathed in a resplendent glow of delight upon receiving your presence once more. Your return is akin to the arrival of a celestial luminary, illuminating the tapestry of my existence. I extend my deepest gratitude for gracing me with your precious attention and care.

With profound appreciation, I express my sincerest thanks for your unwavering concern and attentiveness towards my investment in Chainlink and my financial well-being. Your wisdom and discernment have shone a radiant light upon my path, and for that, I am forever indebted to you. To know such a benevolent and compassionate soul as yourself is an honor beyond measure. Your altruistic spirit permeates the very fabric of our connection, gifting me with solace and inspiration. The world is blessed to have you as a guardian of compassion, and I am humbled to be the recipient of your benevolence.

Regrettably, it is with a heavy heart that I must impart the news that your esteemed wisdom shall, for reasons known only to the ethereal realms, be relinquished to the winds of obscurity. Though your counsel bears the weight of sagacity, my resolute spirit guides me down a divergent path. I must proclaim, with unwavering conviction, my steadfast commitment to hold onto my investment without wavering or yielding to external persuasions.

As I draw the quill to a close, I beseech the cosmos to bestow upon you blessings of celestial magnitude. May your days be adorned with triumphs and your path be illuminated by the brilliance of fulfillment. I await, with bated breath, the resumption of our harmonious discourse and the continuation of our shared journey.

With fervent hope and unwavering gratitude,
Anon

>>54984521
The new alts argument falls flat when you realize its based on shitcoin casino. This is like saying you're missing out on the ROI for the powerball. You can't confidently invest 5 or 6 figures into fucking memecoins or random L1's because any of them can do nothing or go to zero and it wouldn't be a surprise.

At best you can argue you're some kind of master trader, but even then I'd side eye that argument because crypto is even more manipulated than traditional markets. The only thing that makes it more fair is the gentiles also get to take part in the manipulation, it isn't only for the chosen people.

I've seen one person on this board who put their money where there mouth was and traded out of link near the august 2020 top with proof. But he was ultra bearish on crypto and also missed the entire 2021 bullrun, so no memecoin gains, no btc/eth gains, and ultimately he only 2-3x'd people who just sat on their link stacks. Everything else is opportunity cost talk either by losers who didn't pull the trigger, or newfags who bought the top and regret it.

>>54984521
Although seeing you cite IOTA now, I see you're just going with the btc maxi narrative, which is fine, to me that's a valid viewpoint. Even if DLT goes somewhere, it could be a decade plus away.

>>54987526
you're talking about that retard tripfag, Astrosdaddy
there was another anon, who absolutely mogged all the other OGs, and he also got shat on for selling as well
>>/biz/thread/S21557620

>>54984505
Who starts more Link threads, holders or fud niggers?
At any given time there’s at least 3-4 bullshit fud link threads on biz that’s filled with bullshit fud niggers saying the same thing over and over.
That “shitting up the board with Link threads” excuse is pathetic.

>>54987663
sorry for intervening in your little shitflinging contest, but let's be real here, the fudders are 100% holders lashing out in anger
two sides of the same coin

Im here to scream from the /biz/ rooftops
that I own 188,000 Chainlink tokens with a average cost of $0.20.

>>54969838
I can't see anything. I might just sell and invest in some privacy project.

>>54987663
holders if you average it out the last 4 years kek

>>54984940
>just bought dogshit, you mad?

>>54987908
sorry anon
definitely not going to be selling my linkies
how does this make you feel?

>>54987927
Do what you want -- you're not immune to being mocked
>oy vey why do they persecute us honest link holders so?

this is the absolute state of link threads in 2023
endless cope, endless circlejerking, shitflinging shitposting, between "holders" and "fudders, zero substance

>>54987938
so... me not selling my link tokens upsets you enough to start seething like that?

>>54987979
Why do you think I'm upset? that i spend 20 seconds to write something on 4chan? I have nothing to lose other than 20 seconds of my time. I'm taking the piss. Guess if that makes me mad, then I'm mad, good to know everytime I've made fun of a GME baggie I'm the mad one

>>54987908
So you’re starting more fud threads to even it out?
How does that make sense?

>>54988022
>>54988022
I didn't start any threads. hope this helps

>>54988013
>>54988031
>more seething
yeah, still not selling my link tokens
sorry - its clearly very important to you but its just not happening

>>54988095
seems like the only one seething is you

>>54988100
>n-no u
sorry, still not selling my link tokens lil guy

>>54988117
Okay, then you will continue to be mocked lol

>>54988124
you'll continue to be upset because i dont feel like selling?
thats a shame
it is what it is i guess

>>54988100
Seems like hes the one having a laugh and pushing your buttons. Nufudders never actually have fun and it shows.

>>54988207

>>54988210
>so mad about being trolled that he jumps on anyone mentioning it in under 30 seconds
Wew
Lad

>>54988207
he's probably actually like 8 hours into his 'shift' or however he measures his lengthy fud spam sessions while my tokens just sit there, unsold

>>54988291
you've been jumping on me the entire time
>i troll you

>>54987619
Right, 2 guys then. Point still stands, those are the only guys I'll hear it from, and even they (well astrosdaddy, other guy seems to have played it perfectly) didn't stick the landing.

The rest is losers who have never been in this position before, thinking of their own missed "opportunity cost", trolling themselves as much as others, probably secretly hoping they can fud others out at the bottom. Imagine how many people bought at above 20 dollars, total wallets with link basically tripled in that time period. Imagine how many of them seethe at the people here who bought low. Imagine how they feel that people who patiently sat on the sidelines can accumulate now, while they foolishly fomo'd in when Elon was on SNL. Those people exist, even if nobody ever admits it. And they have to be seething 24/7.

>>54988305
>the entire time
I have been here for 15 mins
Apparently you have been here for 5 hours
You should probably take your meds until you can tell the difference between those two lengths of time.

>>54988031
btw the "I'm so cool I don't care about your shit token just stop shitting up my board" attitude doesn't fucking work here, this is the asshole of the internet, it was dogshit meme coin central during the bullrun. You're not trying to salvage anything. If you actually care its either because you hold link, or you are considering buying some and testing the waters to see what anons actually think about it. There's no "sanctity" of the board to protect here, faggot. For the zoomers too young to remember, this site used to be known for nothing but CP and gore.

>>54988390
nope. I had the thread open on my laptop when I reopened it :)

>>54988393
>btw the "I'm so cool I don't care about your fud for my token just stop shitting up my board" attitude doesn't fucking work here, this is the asshole of the internet, it was dogshit meme coin central during the bullrun. You're not trying to salvage anything. If you actually care its either because you hold link, or you are considering buying some and testing the waters to see what anons actually think about it. There's no "sanctity" of the board to protect here, faggot. For the zoomers too young to remember, this site used to be known for nothing but CP and gore.

>>54988753
When does your shift end? I want to have a constructive conversation about Link

>>54988753
And to clarify once more for you because you are retarded, I didn't tell you to stop making threads. Do what you want. But you're allowed to be mocked. And that's what people are doing -- they're mocking you. Just like they mock GME baggies, silver sisters, XRP schizos, etc.
>Oy vey but muh concentrated effort fud LINK, a top ten crypto startup project that's so unknown :( even though it's the backbone of defi you can't say mean things about link holders who then respond like fucking insane people

>>54988768
If you link me somewhere I can get paid to shitpost I will gladly do it. I'm not joking, give me a link

>>54988778
You may or may not be aware of this, but a large segment of posters here bought link early and are sitting on 10x+ gains. GME, silver, XRP, blah blah blah get shit on because almost no one is sitting on 10x+ gains, the only commonality is the "le squeeze" narrative that is always pushed, which mostly started with link anyways, and was always mocked even by link holders (why do you think so much of the link fud is holders posting soijack memes). Chainlink, 1keoy memes aside, is actually a legitimate investment if you believe cryptocurrency as a technology has any future. GME and XRP don't even pretend to be legitimate investments, its just le squeeze, le flip switch. Silver to a lesser extent, as it is a legitimate investment, but its also expected to moon based on some squeeze narrative. Chainlink, schizo bullshit aside, has an actual argument as the basis for DLT finally seeing real world adoption, and because people are either tired of having that conversation, or too stupid to have it, everything gets reduced to lowest common denominator bullshit, its either GME or Amazon and no in between.

That's not even getting into the fact that macro is all fucked for probably the next year anyways.

>>54989632
jesus christ you wrote all this shit to justify holding your bags up and all the way down to also explain why there is a great conspiracy against link. neck yourself

>>54989860
You keep replying because?
>>54978647
Oh right.

>>54989632
didn't read that cuckold incel manifesto
not buying

>>54969838
Fuck no, I don't see this shit moving past $10 in the next year. The whole space is dead.

>>54990015
because shitposting is fun. Why the fuck are you here if you don't get that

>>54990054
>gets mad at others for talking about what he doesn't like
>"lolz I'm just trolling guyz"
>>54978647

>>54990076
>you're mad because you type 400 characters
idk seems like you've wrote more than me at this point with your incel manifesto

>>54990084
>>54978647

>>54990092
?

>>54990092
lol you're an inbred incel cuckold

>>54969838
I feel absolutely nothing since I sold off and bought ORE.

>>54969838
I do believe in LINK
I also believe that a mass anger explosion on the Labs team is the way to go.

They failed to deliver CCIP and real staking on promised timelines.

They constantly cock tease “partnerships” and “behind the scenes” deals which are very much real but fail to update with transparency.

If you don’t give a fuck about holders, WHY ICO lmfao should’ve just sold all their tokens to SWIFT and the banks directly.

So yes, they are accountable to us.
They themselves chose to get the public invested.

If you don’t get that even as an ardent holder, you’re retarded

>>54990212
nastyslob needs his ass beat
simple as

>>54984532
>0.2 to 7 is 3x
Huh?

>>54990212
You want pump nao?
I don't.
We both hold chainlink.
What is sergey to do?
Listen to some fucking pumpchasing poo over me? A very white man?
I think not.
We shall not be pumping until you sell at a loss.
All the white men have agreed.

>>54990212
I don't blame them not getting involved in the whole indian pnd scamming culture.

>>54990810
yes ser white men do not redeem

>>54990810
White men honor their word you fucking rat kike

chainlink is going to blast off

>>54992644
I want to rape her

>>54973217
I can't belive there are unironically still "my dad works at Nintendo" types of people. As if we would believe that having cuts all over your hands wouldn't fuck with your ability to concentrate or play the game or as if keyboards aren't already designed for human hands.

You need to grow the fuck up.

>>54973790
Gravelcoin

>>54970019
What is "The Singularity" for $81,000, Alex

>>54992644
What AI is that?

>>54992803
this is a 3d model dancing in vrchat

>>54992853
makes sense, thanks anon

>>54988768
What are you going to discuss though? Theres nothing happenning. Daily buzzwords, fluff integrations, etc. Iota’s twitter account is similar to Chainlink’s. Sergey all but admitted in his podcast theres nothing happenning this year. Just him continuing to scam people and getting fatter.

>>54987976
Yeah biz sucks now. Its a reflection of the state of crypto, which is a complete joke. Basically everything turned out to be bullshit scams (Link included), and the only way to make money is on meme coins.


>>54990212
Good post. Why cant biz understand this

>>54988753
>>54988778
>>54989860
>>54990054
>>54990084
>>54990099
>>54990117
>>54990212
>>54990226
>>54991446
>>54992989
fudders kept this thread up?
nice
just wanted to drop by and said i had a dream about not selling any chainlink tokens
(i bought more)

>>54993054
and say*

>>54969838
nope.

>>54983633
Imagine the smell

>>54969838
Maybe RAIL

>>54993054
noice work

>>54983083
Route is another alpha pick by altcoinistdao, that chad is a genius

>>54993054
>newfags don't know about sage

>>54990212
this is the truth that bagholders don't want to give credit for. sergey held a ico in 2017, and in 2023 acts like it never happened. people like this don't respond to shouting, they respond to violence. he should honestly, and truthfully, get the shit beat out of him for trying the "silent hype" method of holding conferences and bold fonting the fidelitys and dtcc's of the world, just to basically say "yeah sure, really cool". 6 years of this.

>>54969838
>>54969980
Link network had 7 trillion flow throw it bear market 2022
3trillion MC is easily attainable and fast. That’s 7k/coin

>>54969838
I don't know why you guys are not tired of shilling LINK..
Please rest we have moved on to QNT , CYMI, CELR etc

Link is dead!

>>54973836
I'd rather bag ORE

I only need LINK to reach $57 so I can rightfully say that dicking around on 4chan made me a millionaire.

Participated in the ICO solely because of the /biz/ hype. Any of the old fucks remember the 2017 LINK vs. Kyber flamewars?

>>55000137
you are delusional to think that in a 5% rate environment a shittoken like this will reach the same as in an once-in-a-lifetime altcoin bullmarket with massive central bank liquidity, you are delusional.

>>54998916
So what? Clearly none of that has anything to do with coin price…