/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54820076
token not needed
cope cuckold

>>54820076
IBM is replacing jobs with chainlink
https://www.pcmag.com/news/ibm-plans-to-replace-7800-jobs-with-ai

>>54820081
it took you less than 29 seconds since OP made this thread to post ITT and you're probably already making a second post with mobile data on to switch IPs while I'm writing this post as well

your brain must be rotten from all the endless /biz/ catalog monitoring and refreshing with constant filter searches, all for free

>>54820076
>$6
seems like the Bulgarian chads buck broke your scam

IBM officially replacing workers with Chainlink
>down 2%

>>54820131
>you're probably already making a second post with mobile data on to switch IPs while I'm writing this post as well

>>54820127
get wrecked loser cuckold

>>54820141
meds now

>>54820076
Ctrl+f 0 results

>>54820141
kill yourself cuckold
do it

>>54820081
>>54820131
>>54820142
>>54820150
>>54820153
>>54820159
>Pictured: Bulgarian fud farm, employees paid one Bulgarian rupee per post (roughly $0.001, a local fortune)

>>54820141
sorry cuckold, you’re the laughing stock of biz

>>54820076
based
WWEMI (we will eventually make it)

>>54820076
MAKE IT PUMP
I AM SO FUCKING TIRED, SIX (6), YES SIX FUCKING YEARS AND WE ARE NOWHERE.

>>54820076

>>54820159
Lol look how upset this fag is
>cuck cuck cuck i treat fudding like my full time job reeeeeeeeeeee
Just kys dude, imagine ending up like that

>>54820180
Nah your idol (pic related) is the laughing stock of biz, followed by you because you're mentally ill coomer with a token he doesnt hold living rent free in his head - basically a lower form of life than an internet jannie

>>54820173
>Bulgarian?
??? But they looks like pajeets

>2023
>IBM
you crypto retards will cheer at any shitcoin representation in the news

>>54820127
>>54820424
>>54820402
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

>>54820593
>2023
>EVERY single other crypto has NOTHING while are being shilled by Amazon, Swift, IBM, Pwc, Eric Shmidt, etc.
Please continue not buying.

>>54821437
Its actually so fucking obvious high level players are signaling to each other that Link is how the future is going. I sometimes forget that the people I debate on this forum are mouthbreathing cattle.

>>54821478
From a psychiatric perspective the word "cuckold" triggers Link marines so much because subconsciously they know it's their true nature. Imagine holding a premined erc-20 token with terrible tokenomics for 6 years hoping to make it just to see your pathetic bags getting outperformed by the entire market while you stake your measly tokens for bond tier gains (4% APY). The cherry on top of the cake is Sergey who stringed along the community while he made $500 million by dumping on gullible retail investors like you. The cuckold nature of the Link marine is an undeniable reality.

As with every cult pointing out the truth is often uncomfortable for the cult members. But the truth is....Link marines are simply cuckolds.

>>54820127
kek 'he' DELETED it

>>54821525
I’ve been a professional psychiatrist for the past decade, let me please enlighten you on the delusions of so called Link Marines.

These group of bagholders exhibit clear signs of paranoia and schizophrenia towards the outside world. The so called “FUDDERS” are just a figment of their imagination, there is no global Bulgarian conspiracy to suppress their token but they have decided to double down on their delusions rather than admit they were wrong after 6 years. This is obviously a clear sign of stark cognitive dissonance.

Moreover the constant white knighting towards Sergey clearly symbolizes some sort of financial submissiveness fetish they have. I personally call it the bagholder Stockholm Syndrome. Instead of blaming the dev Link Marines would rather idolize him and elevate him as the cult leader while attacking anyone else that questions his “authority”.

There is no doubt that Link Marines have also a quite peculiar sexual fetish towards cuckoldry. The amount of rage and anger this word triggers is a clear indicating factor that the cuckold nature of the Link Marine is a true reality. As Freud said, the sexual fetishes a person exhibits are a clear reminder of a person’s true desire. After years of studying these so called bagholders…I have concluded that Link Marines are cuckolds.

>>54821493
>>54821546
Tranny are you okay? Tranny are you okay? Are you okay tranny?

>>54821546
>a professional psychiatrist

>>54821493
>>54821546
jeety jeety jeet jeets shitting the streets

>>54821546
>professional psychiatrist
I'd rather work with an unprofessional psychiatrist, knowwhatimsayin?

>>54820127
My theory on that guy and others like him are that they’re just super broke and bitter that they don’t have any Link not the option to buy if they wanted.
I can’t think of anything worse than watching all the stars aligning for Link to explode and not having any spare cash to buy in now when the price is super low.

You have to remember most people live paycheck to paycheck and blow the little money they do make on bullshit.
If I were a debt ridden loser who understood what Link is, I’d probably be fudding too.
Just imagine how angry you’d be if you were some broke loser.

>>54820131
gg, still not selling tho

>>54820076
>IBM bends the knee too
>-3,2%
I’m starting to think that I’m cursed

>>54820153
You need to type "chainlink" after Ctrl+f silly
>4 results

>>54821493
cuckanon is still on the case

>IBM Watson is the newest link marine
Yeah, I'm thinking we're back.

>>54820258
As Ari is an esoteric fag, I think there’s going to be a significant rocket at year 7.

Seriously wouldn’t be surprised at 2024 link finally going past a few hundred maybe a thousand dollars, with the god run occurring in 2026 all the way to 20 thousand plus USD.

>As Ari is an esoteric fag, I think there’s going to be a significant rocket at year 7.

>Seriously wouldn’t be surprised at 2024 link finally going past a few hundred maybe a thousand dollars, with the god run occurring in 2026 all the way to 20 thousand plus USD.

>>54821546
Yeah not reading that troonie manifesto

>>54820076
>blog
Just sold 100k

>>54822015
>hehe the salty FUDDERS are just jealous of my unpumpable shitcoin bags

>>54820076
in b4 jannies move this thread to /g/ too
>>54820538

>>54820076
They cant afford to pay their employees, so Sergay must be cutting them a helluva deal

>>54822422
Bro what the fuck? That was my thread. Thought it disappeared fast.

>>54820076
The increase in these large enterprises from Citibank to IBM shilling Link is for one reason only.
>don't say we didn't warn you

The standardization of Chainlink's Oracle Network across every major industry you can think of will come off as "inorganic" to the public. As Schmidt himself talked about, the rapid rate of AI adoption and its underlying architectures are moving a lot more faster than Google's market takeover could of ever dreamed of replicating. I recall him citing ChatGPTs gaining a near half a billion user base in a handful of months as an example of this. This is why these articles are published; to pretend that all the signs where there for retail to cash in, but they where too busy sloshing around meme tokens to see the trees from the forest.

The disparity from how ""they"" shill Chainlink to how say Cramer farms exit liquidity from his viewers for his masters is that no one is going to spell it out for anyone because it's real. If you can't read in-between the lines, it all just sounds like cool tech, but because everyone is so used to fighting over who will win @ settlement (good luck btw kek) they can't understand the true tokenomics of layer two scalability. To boot, they have made sure that large figureheads in the "cryptospace" themselves either pretend it doesn't exist or get a kick back for putting it down. I think it was Hayes who was even paid to say layer two's needing tokens ""didn't make sense to him". I'm still trying to find his 2017 blog on blockchain interoperability but I just can't seem to find it.

Bottomline is they won't say you got lucky, they will say something even more belittling: That is was obvious from the get-go.

>>54820076
>control-f chainlink
>0 results

>>54822804
you can't ctrl+f screenshots you braindead gypsy nigger maybe you should stick to stealing copper and eating hedgehogs you double nigger or maybe just learn to read

>>54822744
checked

>>54820076
Kek why didn’t you sell

>>54820076
call me when Apple does it

>>54820127
kek you made him self reflect so hard he deleted his posts from shame

>>54822744
Not only is the cat out of the box, it was never in the box.

>>54822649
>>54822422
Guys what the hell is going on here? I think something big is starting to be uncovered.

>>54820076
Flare is going to be retardedly big and it's cheap right now

>Chainlink dumping billions on retail to fund marketing
>IBM/Forbes etc. get shit loads of cash from LINK cuckolds without needing to make any binding agreements
Pay up linky, marketing costs aren't going to pay for themselves.

>>54822744
well said. got any more thoughts on the topic? been awhile since i've read some insightful perspective here.

>>54824269
So now chainlink is spending too much money marketing? I thought their marketing was awful?

>>54821525
>That pic.
Many such sad cases.

>>54820076

>>54825951
>made it
>barely able to afford a nice home
You faggots are so retarded. The distribution of wealth in the system has remained unchanged. A million meant something a hundred years ago back in the roaring 1920s but today you can just JUST afford to afford a home and you still have to wage

>>54825994
Things aren't usually this black and white, anon. With $1.5m, he can buy a very good home and still earn substantial returns in an ETF for the rest. Maybe he has to wage for a few more years but if he did he'd be earning that money with no rental or mortgage expense theoretically. He will escape the cage in a number of years or choose to take that interest as a supplement and either take a less stressful job or go part-time.

Suggest you correct your perspective on money and what it can do to you else you'll set yourself up to fail when that money comes. If you don't think $1.5m can change your life and lock in a (very) early retirement, you out yourself as a zoomer with no life experience.

He had what I had in LINK at the top last year. I held all of it, despite having a good grasp on when the top was in, for much the same stupid reasons you just described, wanting to get it all done in one go.

>>54820127
absolutely based lmao

>>54820127
What did he post?

>>54825951
>just gamble 150,000 on a rugpull bro.

>>54825951
i guarantee he didn't sell, otherwise he would've taken a pic of a bank transfer.

>>54820076
I just read the article and had a few takeaways:

-this is the IBM “blog” and not really an endorsement by the company. But at least its on their website. If you take a look at the other articles, you can tell they just threw some shit together so they can saw they are staying on top of le blockchain tech. Their last article was titled “the future of digital money”… Wow original. No one will read any of these blogs.

-the author of this article is two years off an internship at the company, meaning a) he doesnt know anything about anything because hes still a baby and b) they said hey have the lowest man on the totem pole go update the blockshit blog when hes done getting coffee for everyone.

-The actual article itself seems incomplete. Its like it wants to advertise Link but never quite gets there. 99% of people reading this would have zero fucking clue what it’s talking about.

The second paragraph title was about challenges of adoption and the actual content was copy pasted buzzword techie talk. If there wasnt an actual name listed as author of this, I wouldve assumed chatgpt wrote this.

-Finally, you posting this article from March here in May is a little desperate and also confirmation this is a complete nothingburger, as it has done nothing for price. I appreciate the attempt to try to find positive news in a sea of negativity though.

>>54826600
>fast food worker comments on something way above his pay grade
Thanks but no thanks.

>>54822744
What is their incentive to “make it look like it was obvious?” What difference does it make? I have a hard time buying into the secret investment theory these days

>>54820076
dropped

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAMT187GWd4

>>54825560
here's another one
nufudders are the dumbest posters on this board by far

>>54822744
Based. "We've had articles out about this for years". Hiding in plain sight.

>>54826675
>your observations end where my feelings begin

Dont you just hate when the free speech here works against you? If only there was a website you could filter opinions via groupthink with upboats and heavy moderation…

>>54826678
Their incentive as a tech company is to be able to demonstrate that they have a handle on new technologies that are extremely relevant to their bottom line.
But if the smart contract S curve takes off with full buy-in from one of these companies, but they've never even mentioned it in any of their publicity, then people could rightly ask why the public seemed to be intentionally kept out of the loop.
So you throw a few articles out there that nobody reads as a way of saying "We did our part, we told everyone about this too".

>>54826742
how did free speech work against him?
you wrote your plebbit spaced rant about the article because you just think that quantity = quality and he pointed out that you're obviously an idiot
quick! better go jump on your phone and back yourself up!

>>54826847
>nastyslob
good name

>>54826709
>>54821525
>paid marketing nigger faggot thinks rules limit actions on 4chinnel
>honestly believes anon don't just do whatever they want and laugh about it
>paid marketer caps posts as evidence of retardation
>looks like this old article is not picking up steam shill camp better switch to le ol fudders are pathetic angle
where do you think you are nigger?
Consider this
>demoralized fudders only draw attention to the project for the wrong reasons (but you stopping this leds me to believe you want this kept hush hush to appeal to some hyper intellectuals who can't distinguish what's what and need hand-holding like a vidya on tutorial mode
>upon further investigation any idiot can figure it out for themselves without hand holding but you choose to be the lame voice over on facebook videos explaining what everyone can see with their own eyes
>chan culture is dying no new users are coming here
>zoomers do not give a fuck about any of le ironic post memetic fud-shill dialectic
>they just want to make tik toks and pretend everything is fine
>the well your talent was drawn from is tapped and you don't know where the new one is
>99% of the faggots taking code camps and participating in the hackathons are vaxxed NPC nigger cattle
>the best new image tech elites could come out with is some amalgamation software erroneously titled AI as if interpolation between data points denoted (((intelligence))) but hey at least they are doing something productive with all the data they have harvested from users for decades
>if those software companies paid users for their data all the problems of the world would be solved and people would happily hand over their data
>but no no no we must focus on le accumulation fud-shill dialect secret narrative hidden war web3 must install more micropayments on the web because ITS THE FUTURE
I could go on but I'm sure you will cherry pick one single point to latch on to and that will invalidate my post in your eyes dumb fuck

>>54823672
And yet the cat was simultaneously in it all along

>>54823672
>>54826915

>>54826894
>t. full-time cumbrain fudder feels personally attacked, probably because he's one of the samefagging retards in the screencaps and writes a manifesto in response
have you ever tried to describe the thouands of hours you've wasted on here to a family member or irl friend?

>>54827025
obviously not t., i started to write it as such but just changed it to a summary and removed it

>>54826808
Seems like a reach to me. That blog post was a joke. Who are these people that are going to ask and why do they matter

>>54826847
>having to read 3 paragraphs in quantity
Take advil for headaches zoom zoom

>an idiot
Says the guy in a cult

>anyone who posts critcism is all one person switching ids

About a 9/10 on the paranoia scale. Touch grass

>>54827335
>>your observations end where my feelings begin
Dont you just hate when the free speech here works against you? If only there was a website you could filter opinions via groupthink with upboats and heavy moderation…

>>54827335
>please waste your time reading the paragraphs garbage that i post in bad faith
no
>y-you're in a cult
yeah bro i regret drinking koolaid that has me 6 figures in the green, not including the shitcoins ive made bank on while i wait for link
>stop shining the light on us it burns
maybe fudcucks should stop being so shit at samefagging if they don't want to be mocked for it?

>>54827365
you are poor, an incel and a cuckold kek

>>54827365
paragraphs of garbage* jesus christ im gonna go get that coffee now i think

>>54827377
>coomer fudd has been shut down to the point where all he can bark about is "cucks" in an act of defiant projection
powerful
yeah, coffee time now
go fix up your life anon, i know you don't have much of one considering you probably spend 10+ hours a day here posting about a token you apparently don't hold

>>54827380
go shit on the street while you're at it, jeet

>>54823751
Jews? I knew that. NY Jews you mean.

>>54827403
>incel manifesto
not reading any of that
stay poor cuckold lmao

>>54827467
>incel manifesto
sjfsdgdf rsf earf

>>54827467
kek saying "didn't read" is the most middle school way to say "i read it and im seething"

>>54822071
What's the argument for a person like myself who has money burning a hole in their pocket and is looking to allocate it in various crypto assets for the next two years to buy LINK over say BTC or ETH?
I've been a /biz/ reader for a long time, so I've seen this story play out countless times where some legit tradfi company gives props to Chainlink. But my honest impression is that all of this type of stuff was sort of vaguely 'priced in'(and I use this pretty loosely since I think LINK will still go a bit in dollar terms with crypto) during previous hype cycles where anons here dropped all these breadcrumbs that shit like this was going to happen(thus people bought).
It's just honestly hard to see a scenario where LINK is going to generate enough hype to outdo like ETH or something. Because none of the tradfi pumping I've seen on here like this ever has any tangible effect on LINK. It's like everyone knows it's good, and it was bought up to some semi-fair price or something and it floats there...is my impression.
Obviously I could be wrong and I know this thus I'm making this post.
...
As a side note and kinda unrelated to my post:
It's a shame that every link thread gets derailed by a bunch of spastic retards(both linkies and people shitting on link)...
Part of me thinks that if the weird copypastas stopped a lot of this shit would just go away. It's like both 'sides' get off on prodding each other for attention at the cost of everyone else.

>>54820076
>THE DEFAULT OPTION
THE DEFAULT OPTION
>THE DEFAULT OPTION
THE DEFAULT OPTION
>THE DEFAULT OPTION
THE DEFAULT OPTION

>>54820076
So...
IBM just endorsed us...
Uhh...
Where is the pump?

>>54820076
if what you posted is true, why is it down 90%? good try scammer

>>54827917
Down 90% from what?

>>54826545
Apparently. It's the mid bellcurve meme.

>>54826561
I thought the same. If he didn't sell a majority of that he's an idiot. Clearly a gambler in the first place. Funny, I posted it because it hurt to read like picrel but in a way reminds me how I ended up with LINK in the first place. The only mistake I made was not taking profits and that shit burns more than anything I've ever done in my entire life.

>>54826894
Didn't read your poorfag manifesto but pointing out your low iq samefagging seemed to rile you up lmao

>>54827682
It’s unironically like Boomer Buffet said. A good company that is underrated by the market will eventually be recognised for what it’s worth.
Link has always been one of if not the most important crypto projects. Ask yourself why every company out there is interested in blockchains and smart contracts and why Link is the only one that completes them.

>>54824735
Sure, lets answer that fudding faggots question who is of course is arguing in bad faith and not worth a (you) from either us.

>Who are these people that are going to ask and why do they matter

Sergey's battlecry was always "trust the protocol, not the person". So who are the people going to be asking what is Chainlink and where did it come from? The 7,800 people that IBM plans to replace kek. But really, every person that has a job related to TRUST! Look at any career path at an accounting firm, those people are employed because other people can't be trusted to report correctly without others looking over them. Those are PEOPLE that will be REPLACED by a PROTOCAL. And that's just the first wave, god knows what will become of other career paths.

And what of the company's that didn't know about Chainlink or had no way to properly use it? They all go bust too. What will be left are the megacorps that found a way to stay alive by leveraging oracle technology and advancements in AI. PwC will take a whole new form in the future, which they call ""digital revitalization"" or was it KPMG that said it, I forgot all the same. WAGIES NOT NEEDED

So to answer that faggots question, EVERYONE and EVERY BUSINESS will be asking and they only ""matter"" during the transition period. Setting up the narrative that they had a chance to stay alive, offloading the blame, but we all know it was rigged from the start. It's just a formality while they roll out the UBI and divvy up the good boy points to the masses. But don't worry, the pod won't feel as cramped with the VR goggles on.

>>54827682
You are not enthusiastic about link because the price has been stagnant for a few years. Once it starts pumping again you will fomo. Problem is you won't realise it till it's back at ath. Takes balls to buy at the lows that's why noone does it. Everyone thinks like you.>>54827682

>>54828600
>the pedos in charge were all recently executed at gitmo
>two more weeks until the truth comes out
>please read my incel manifesto
you are a deranged psycho seething at the world. Who hurt you anon? Just bee yourself and you will be fine. Sign out of your 4channel account and go out in the world. COPE and God bless

>>54828297
>>54828731
I'd agree with both of you if buying LINK was equivalent to buying shares in [whatever legal structure is behind Sergey's company](desu I'm not quite sure what the setup is there).
Overall it seems risky.
I think if something changed I'd be able to buy LINK fast enough to catch a move just because I'm on here enough that I feel like I get all of the info quick enough to beat the masses should something happen.
Is that a guarantee? Definitely not. But it seems that way. Maybe I get proven wrong and I wake up and see 100% candles or some shit. If so I promise I'll make a post outlining how I was wrong and you were right.
But until then I think my signal will be basically be something like 'good news like OP actually begins to have an effect on the market'. Then I might strongly consider fomoing.
Actually this post has convinced me that even if BTC outperforms ETH for a while, there's a lot of value of having native ETH ready to go on a hardware wallet should I need to flip it quickly into LINK or something. Can't really do that very quickly with BTC without a CEX...

>>54828600
Was there ever any doubt that Link would ironically lead to a more centralised world

>>54828821
What even is this deranged bot post?

>>54828887
>4 absolutely MALDING posts by this ID
seething lol

>>54828939
Another deranged bot post. What is happening here?!

>>54827762
Our glass and aluminum set needs something else behind the host to make it "pop"
Hmm have you considered leaning a sheet of OSB sheathing against the window?

Perfect!

>>54828976
That was never explained. It was so weird. Clearly it was covering something but what? Damage? Was that the best thing they could find?

>>54828600
Checked. You obviously know your shit and its rare to find another person that’s as well informed here. I wish you the most happiness in life anon. It has felt hella lonely around here lately.

>>54820127
Hmm, seems like his post wasn't needed.

>>54821546
>I’ve been a professional psychiatrist for the past decade, let me
Nope, not reading + you're jewish.

>>54820195
kek
>heat death of the universe postponed at the last moment by chainlink
-2.3%

>>54822744
>I think it was Hayes who was even paid
100% he has been paid off, these past 2 years arthur has been one of the few big commentators in the space that has been mostly accurate and more important has stayed consisted in his commentary on the space
too bad he was off by 3 weeks in may last year or he would truly be an epic market caller

but compare his statement of:
i bought eth at 100 bucks after calling it a 2 digit shitcoin when i saw the value of things being build ontop of eth being several times its marketcap
in present year chainlink does what chainlink does
>arthur: crickets
>shills dogshit nft gambling tokens

>>54828887
its the pol spambot, overs the years and it took them years they only ever made a bot capable of disrupting pol
its completely useless elsewhere as you can see in its nonsensicle reply in this context for they still havent figured out that we have our own culture here, just dont ever respond to them or repeat any of their trigger words

>>54828600
altho correct in your reasoning those people dont matter
this articles are written for the UHNWI, thats the only ones that matter for they pay to get wealth management and consulting on news
they pay the analysts bills so the analysts need to cover all their bases to tell these people that pay them i wasnt incompetent you just didnt pick up the hint i gave
you have no idea how lax some people are in paying these fees and how retarded these consultancy firms are
now ibm isnt a consultancy firm but that wagie is in an analyst position very similar in nature

also pwc and kpmg well be fine, they just pivoted to services, or explaining the tech to boomers and xers, its all the shitfirms who do nothing but number crunching accounting that will be rekt

bags must be heavy

>>54828600
>Look at any career path at an accounting firm, those people are employed because other people can't be trusted to report correctly without others looking over them. Those are PEOPLE that will be REPLACED by a PROTOCAL.
Absolutely 100% wrong.

okay that's cool and all but
>wen ccip
>wen airdrops
>wen number go up

Forbes has this weird novel idea just recently paywalled

>>54820140
Chainst1nk isn't ai.

they've shilled other shit too it's not exceptional

>>54820076
another nothingburger brought to you by a schizo cult member
how's that swift partnership coming along stinkies

>>54827775
>just

Its an article from March man. Jesus this place has gone to shit.

>>54828600
This reads like fantasy. Very dramatic. Is there going to be a parade for Linkies too?

Agree some jobs will be replaced as they always are with new technology, and others will be created. I laugh when I hear the accounting firm example as its always clear when someone knows nothing about the profession. Maybe tech and AI replace the low level bookkeepers and data input stuff, but zero chance anything above that gets replaced. Accounting and tax require high levels of judgement and nuance. Anyone in the field will tell you that.

>>54828850
Very reasonable take. Imo next year you might see some good price action so may want to get in before then. Sergey has all but come out and said this year is a wash. In that podcast he did this year, he basically said I hope something good happens but Im not sure.

>>54831415
Glad someone else here also understands the intricacies of accounting, finance, and tax.

>>54821493
Are you doing this for free?

>>54826894
Just call them a faggot and move on, anon. It comes off as butthurt when you write an entire blogpost.

>>54831617
Think of both options. Either someone is paid to spam cuckold related vitriol to an anonymous group of internet investors. Or someone is personally motivated to spam cuckold related vitriol to an anonymous group of internet investors.
Both of those options are so absurd as to be hilarious, but it has to be one of the two.

>>54820076
>mentioned in passing in a blog post from March
>shilling

>>54828600
I tend to agree with the end game of your thesis, but I do think you are severely underestimating the time to get there. Fields like accounting and tax are indeed nuanced, but also inherently protected by the legislative appendages of the bureaucracy. Accounting is not entirely a formula and neither is tax, judgement is involved as well as lobbying. I would imagine that AI white collar services would go through some form of attempted legislative prohibition before being outright castrated by AI in terms of efficiency in response and cost. These firms will fight to maintain the status quo and lobby for their survival rather than first adapt bc 1. boomers dont trust AI or crypto, and 2. they have immense investment in providing services in the existing system and will fight to preserve that system.

Crypto is indeed the endgame, but I fear that without a massive breakthrough in tech AND legislation AND an outside catalyst event we are in for looong spectator period while we sit on our bags. Thats not to say we wont get wealthy in the next cycle, but it does mean that complete corporate and societal adoption wont be seen until at least 2030. The good news is that if you hold until then you will live as a God - the bad news is that you will lord over a ruinous hellscape spawned by the Boomers last breath.

>ITT cuckolds hyping up another nothingburger
btw $6 lol

>>54832268
he might be underestimating, but you are overestimating

AI is just the current shiny brand new hype train, the technology is literally decades away from being actually useful, this is just another paid marketing piece.
>the next cycle
There won't be a next cycle for a while, we're long overdue for an extended crypto bear.

Is chainlink watching us? The article was posted in March, why all of a sudden did they post it?

https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1653746435572092928

>>54832319
>21 hours later
>still checking up on a thread for a token he apparently doesnt hold to spam the same fud over and over again
Sergey could die and link could literally go to 0 and I would only feel thankful that im not this cumbrained tranny kek

>>54832478
haha I saw that too. Very odd timing they just now decided to make a post about the March article right after it was posted on biz. I guess that settles the debate on whether advocates/team members are on this board...

>>54832478
Yes
That’s how they get anons to hold their bags even tighter

>>54831415
>I laugh when I hear the accounting firm example as its always clear when someone knows nothing about the profession.
And I laugh when I hear someone knows nothing about DLT. I understand a lot of dweebs think accounting is a glorified data entry position, look at that 2013 Oxford review on the future of the profession that called for a 90 something percent probability of it not existing in the next ten years...

But you miss the details of HOW it will replace it. That being FULL TRANSPERENCY OF ALL BUSINESS ENTRYS. No one knows exactly how this will look, but imagine a public ledger tied to a businesses ERP that the IRS has direct access to and is updated in real time. It could automatically send the IRS the right docs at the right time and all they would have to do is run there own audit on the ledger (and arguably might not even have to do that either). If the IRS already had access to this data, and had the technology to monitor it, they don't need (you). Keep in mind a lot of the regulations in place is because you can't trust the person, so the protocol won't have to worry about a lot of the bs on your CPA exam because it won't make the same mistakes.

On the managerial side of accounting, the data from the ERP plugged into the right insights api could provide the wisdom on what to do next better than your most knowledgeable CPA because it can pool from an ocean of data to pick out its preferred course of action. Keep in mind this is also because the ""creativity"" of accounting will be a thing of the past, it would become a lot more cut and dry than it ever has. (I could go on about how CBDCs will make this process even more cut in dry when every transaction DOWN TO THE DIGITAL PENNY is on the IRS monitoring ledger.)

Also real quick, like I said in first post AI is moving much quicker than what we are used to seeing in the tech field. Everyone has Web 2.0 product cycle timeframes fogging their minds over just how FAST this is going go.

>>54832548
Didn't you know? Between putting out world changing reserarch papers Ari likes to spam poorly constructed cuckold memes on here.

>>54832957
>But you miss the details of HOW it will replace it.
>No one knows exactly how this will look
good job on contradicting yourself

>>54821546
If you're a psychiatrist, you're on the same level of shitty as those attention whore creeps who constantly go on television to "diagnose" Trump as a psychopath without ever meeting him.

i have 16k link am i gonna make it frens???

>>54832957
You've clearly demonstrated that you know nothing about the profession.

>>54831174
>he doesn't know

>>54832957
I've thought about that a little bit and when you pull that thread, the amount of competition in any business that uses this model is practically eliminated.
When you put everything on chain, managed by AI, it makes it easier from a managerial point of view, but when you're also transparent to you competitors and customers, all of the sudden they become on and the same.
When that happens, profit margins become thinner, and only the huge firms can survive.

Then when this type of accounting becomes the standard or even government mandated to ensure maximum taxation compliance, it'll be practically impossible to start a new business unless you've got millions to install just your accounting protocol.
I don't even know what you call that kind of an economic model

>>54832548
The Big Mac meme makes it obvious I’d say

>>54833014
No but I’m absolutely certain he was behind these esoteric link posts. I bet he also chuckles when we meme him being responsible for oracle hacks.

>>54833258
> when you're also transparent to you competitors and customers, all of the sudden they become on and the same.
thats where deco comes in

>>54833258
>it'll be practically impossible to start a new business unless you've got millions
yeah thats not different from present day reality

>>54821493
I had sex with my Jewish friend's wife while he watched before he tried to hit me with a PvP flag when I wouldn't fuck him too.
I just disconnected and stopped fucking his wife because aggression from both parties makes murder lawful here.

>>54833258
It will never happen that way. All these ideas assume that companies run a single ledger in one central ERP system. The reality is that most corporates run dozens if not hundreds of ledgers across multiple systems that only ever interface with a consolidation system at month end.
But even at month end once the interface has been done (which itself takes days because of late entries, reconciliations, manual journals etc) the work is just beginning. You have intercompany eliminations to process, provision adjustments, IFRS vs GAAP adjustments, tax adjustments (since tax base and accounting base for assets can be different), not to mention that local teams will also be processing their own local IFRS/GAAP & tax adjustments since the rules vary in different jurisdictions. And that is just statutory financial accounting, management accounting is a separate beast.

>>54821546
Damn that's some good FUD, you're gonna make me buy in again

I’ve heard Chainlink token is now the official coin for cuckholding, is this true?

>>54831453
I just had the Chainlink Functions bootcamp yesterday with their beta using 4 nodes of a DON to make a secret hidden code executions.
It felt like history when I subscribed to the DON service and got an ID under 1000.
I haven't felt like this in a long time. It reminded me of the mainnet but this was even more revolutionary.

This can change the world.
Did you ever think why we only got DeFi with the price feeds and not more adoption?
It's because everything is public currently.
But most business operate in a private space and control the information which goes outside.

Chainlink Functions adds a privacy layer to the blockchain space in addition to total composability freedom with any Web 2 API that may exist in the world.
It's also more decentralized than ETH because in the future you will have control over the nodes which execute your code and it will be more diverse than ETH staking and runs at a lower cost.

They created a local debugging function which allows you to test your code on your machine before uploading it to the blockchain.

>>54834066
Retuers Fact-Check: TRUE

Independent researchers have concluded that the Chainlink community is made up of hardcore cuckolds who brag about losing dollars, sats and gweis while attacking anyone who doesn't conform to their cult.

>>54832381
>twitter.com/chainlink/status/1653746435572092928
If I am overestimating then its not by much. I did say we'd get rich next cycle if you arent already. But global adoption will still take at least 5+ years. CBDCs wont be ready for at least another 2 years, so use that as your bench mark. We are only at the very very very beginning of discussing legislation. How long do you think that will take?

>>54834658
Total domination will take a while. But there’s a lot of prices between $7 and $81k. Most of us have made it long before then.

>>54834746
You're talking to people with childlike cognitive skills.
>adoption is either all or nothing
>if it hasn't happened yet, it's never happening
>I will only buy when shit has exploded and price has mooned already
etc.

>>54834789
>price is all that matters
>if fundamentals are good but price is bad, then fundamentals are bad
etc. etc. etc.

>>54832957
Again, this end game is not incorrect - just impossibly optimistic on the near to mid term time scale. Your described future implies a widely adopted and fully embraced UBI (which will happen) but not until AT LEAST 2030. You could not displace an entire sector of white collar workers (but really your situation would encapsulate nearly all white collar workers) without absolute economic upheaval never before seen. And to what end would corpos systematically gut the very class of people who purchase their products/services?

The incentives are not aligned yet. We are living in a controlled demolition and they cannot push too much all at once because 1. tech isnt ready yet and 2. they dont want too much unrest to possibly bring out guillotines. So our system will be dismantled one piece at a time and resurrected into the WEFGlobohomo/15 min city/UBI over many years.

>>54834746 >>54834789

idk wtf you are talking about. Didnt I say exactly that?? we will make it next cycle which i consider a $100-$200 link, but global domination of God tier wealth (read: global adoption) is not until 2030. Is BTC globally adopted rn? not even close. Are there long term BTC holders who are stupendously wealthy? of course.

>>54834658
I strongly see a 26,000 dollar LINK by 2026 or early 2027.

Kek knows.

>>54835558
I would not be disappointed in this event, but it is no where in the universe of possibilities.

>>54835505
I wasn't trying to disagree with you

>>54835505
You're talking to people who refuse to read up a convo to find out the actual context, and who simply type the first kneejerk response that comes up in their minds.

>>54820076
Disgusting disgrace
Imagining IBMs press release will aid a cuck without personal information network.

>>54836077
checked
huh?

>>54833062
Yes if you take an entire sentence out of a response it could come off as contradicting. But what I am specially referring to is DECO, yes I don't exactly know how DECO will be implemented because even the sandbox's are using a few different methods of using it that are completely different approaches.

>You've clearly demonstrated that you know nothing about the profession
You sound like a paintpig art hoe when Stable Diffusion came out. It doesn't understand the study of the lighting inconsistencies, color theory, composition, brushwork and perspective! It's not real art! Hold on I just got an email from HR kek.

But really I tired of arguing with Excel Monkeys. Didn't Aladdin taking all of BlackRock's Senior Portfolio Managers jobs showcase the power of this shit? Did you know there used to be human skill involved in market making? Sure sure compliance will move slower than the buy side with upgrading operations but Oracle Networks are SYNTHETIC TRUST. This is what will finally take out the compliance sector of the white collar world.

>>54835367
>AT LEAST 2030
I'm not being sarcastic when I say I didn't mean tomorrow. 7 years is not a long time, also obviously Links price will be in far better standing before that. When I say a career is going to die. I mean they you will not be able to get away with spending the rest of your life doing X. Yes, you might get away with being an accountant for a few more years, but retirement and moving up the corporate ladder is no go because the ladder won't exist in futures time.

I also think a ""cataclysmic event"" would accelerate this process, something we have not seen with web 2.0.

Like a Cyberpandemic of something, 2020 proved to me public consensus is puddy in the hands of the Edward Bernays of the world. Exspecially when everything is tokenized.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/riTE_j-wN5E

>>54836272
>2020 proved to me public consensus is puddy in the hands of the Edward Bernays of the world
2020 was a tyranny pandemic that woke a lot of people up and immunized them against the mental pathogen a repeat to varying degrees. Yea a lot of people still have their heads up their asses but it's not like the public was an entirely passive, actor, completely incapable of learning. Just look at the John Campbell's evolution from a "misinformation bad! Trust the science!" shill to a blackpilled skeptic.

>>54836272
Read >>54833531
The fact that you think you solve all of this via "just throw it on a blockchain bro" proves you have zero knowledge of the accounting, finance, and tax professions nor the complexities and challenges they face. A.k.a you're a fucking retard

>>54835558
Linkies are the biggest retards on biz. I stand a chance to make a 10x from pepe than from link. The scamcoin is dead already anonfag, go hunting for the next big gem on altcoinistdao. Stop being a boring mancunt

>>54832957
>>54832319
>>54832268
>>54820076

based and meanwhile ponzimarines will wait on ccip to flop same time next year. They say link will moon out of nowhere as it bleeds sats for years now. Partnerships were a lie, smartcon was a joke, new tech is always delayed. HR roasties paid 400k/yr to do nothing. Linkpool rugged and sergey hires the rugger to the team, what happened to all the linkpool shillers, absolute radio silence, but i mean people like me and unc were warning you idiots after it go found out that mat beale the confounder of a ponzi token ontop of a ponzi token was a coked out retard who immediately dump his entire linkpool stack moments after being terminated. Moab rugged to zero after sergeys scrubbed tweet, chainlink funds managed by khater a literal pornwhore. What the fuck was king bigmax thinking kek? Oh thats right, quantitative eating kek! Adelyn failed at marketing. Celsius partnership was cataclysmic, didn't anyone ever listen to the podcast with flannelman and mashinsky? Sergey was shilling celsius like there was no tomorrow and guess what celsius rugged, took everything and ran just like the plan was from the start. Sergey even had SBF put on shilling how great a guy he was topkek. Notice a pattern here? Sergey shills scams they dump and he shills another scam and they rug yet again. The psyop was from the start to shill this to biz to keep his own personal dumps afloat. Sergey is jewish and hates all the antisemites here so obviously he would want to fuck over anyone here he can, look at how many jews he's partnered with and exitscammed, and the ponzimarines here won't notice any type of pattern whatsoever, but if that same pattern is being deployed en masse in a shrewd way with muh secret coin that will skyrocket because of fintech usecase heres some breadcrumbs then the ponzimarines will gladly take a swan dive off the rooftops to bag up on more useless tokens that have been cratering for years. ICO prices eoy

>>54837835
long time no see brother
happy you're still around

>>54837835
>Sergey even had SBF put on shilling how great a guy he was topkek
Letting the temporary main character speak at your conference via video isn’t shilling

>>54837862
great to see you too brother, I'm always lurking, currently building 8 properties in italy and 9 in dubai so I've been busy taking flights back and forth from there and dubai

I just come here to gloat about how me and unc perfectfly called the top of this shit token, and urged anons to open up shorts, those that shorted made millions, those that didn't are still making breadcrumb shitposts years later coping and seething. Here's a breadcrumb for all the ponzimarines reading this, sell immediately and open up a short, this will bleed to 50 cents by september. Thank me later.
>>54837881
Obviously you have no idea what you're talking about let me break this down for you
Sergey shilled MOAB on his personal twitter and on the chainlink main twitter, MOAB was a pump and dump exitscam. Anyone who invested in MOAB lost everything, what happened after MOAB rugged? Sergey scrubs the tweets.
Sergey Shilled Celsius for years and had money with them, he didnt do his due diligence, he had several interviews with Mashinsky the CEO of Celsius, Celsius inevitably rugged and Mash made off like a bandit, i know for a fact retards on here lost millions after they trusted sergey shilling mashinsky, funds at Celsius were managed by an actual whore who did a girlsdoporn clip named jessica khater. Theres 2 exitscams sergeys shilled
Sergey shilled SBF multiple times just watch the vods or any interview with king bigmac, he shilled FTX for years and wanted SBF at smartcon, con artists recognize con artists. Guess what? 3rd times the charm another ponzi that explodes after sergey shills it
I know of other garbage he's shilled that went bankrupt as well but it's not even worth mentioning it. You need to understand sergey is a maniacal con man with zero remorse for anything he's done to fuck over small peoples money. This crypto called chainlink will drop to zero right after sergey finishes dumping 700k loads onto the open market and flees to the caymans. Get out while you still can

>>54838099
>>54837835

Thats alot of text for me not to read.

>>54838244
good dont read it and keep bagholding, low energy ponzi follower newfag
pic related, sergeys father in a red lambo paid off by you, the bagholder, you will never get a lambo ever

>>54832957
Are you a college student? Thats hilarious you think any industry would ever allow real time IRS auditing to plug into their systems. WTF

On financial statement audits, some of the processes will be outsourced to new technology but the interpretation of complex rules, review, etc will always be human. You clearly dont have a grasp of what really goes into this stuff

>>54832957
Also, a random mid 20s ranked shitcoin isnt needed for any of this

>>54838288
>sergeys father
What's the source on this one?

>>54838343
terminally shut in autistic NEETs think that the real world is simple enough to run on determinstic self-executing smart contracts. These people are also terminally online and have never had a job in their lives. Chainlink is useful for defi price feeds, nothing more.

>>54838507
newfag?

>>54838513
>>54838525
>fudfag knows obscure /biz/ chainlink lore
really gets the ol noggin joggin

>>54838525
More like intermittentfag who missed that one.

>>54838556
I'm not a fudfag, I take part in chainlink discussions because I find the technicals interesting. Smart contracts are interesting but they never will be adopted by mainstream finance.

>>54838343
>>54838358
Found the Jewish shill! Just bought $200 more. How does that make you feel, Schlomo?

>>54838599
you're the jew here, not him.

>>54838592
What do you find interesting about them?

>>54839775
The idea of decentralised oracles and the range of chainlink products that it offers are fascinating and the team is undoubtedly comprised of some of the smartest people alive today (Juels, Malkhi, Moujahid etc) who will no doubt continue releasing innovative and interesting features that will be essential for blockchain tech.

>>54839775
Only when trafi broke their old contracts and they need to gain people’s trust. What’s the alternative?

>>54840264
The alternative is definitely not blockchain. I will bet my life on the fact that chainlink will not be widely used ever and that 50 dollars will be the highest in value the project will ever see.

>>54828976
>>54829123

It was to hide the reflection o yuuuge bulge in Sergeys pants. nokt2

>>54840318
get ready to kys then faggot