/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54812714

wow ethtards still believe in vitalik's uptopian bs... how surprising
what we built is so good that everyone is just going to migrate to our perfect little system! LOL!

>oracles are optional
no they are not needed. tnn lol

>>54812714
>every computer will have it's own internet protocol

>>54812714
Does anyone know why Maker in partiuclar hate Chainlink so much? Even among all the seethe from the ETH community, the Maker crew seem really out there on top.

>>54812714

>>54812714
>see that post
>dont even know who this guy is but immediately smell them
>my paradigm detector immediately starts tingling
>first thought "what new bullshit is paradigm trying to push today"
>look it up
>it's paradigm

>>54812726
>>54813000
Kek

>>54812884
I think they're competitors.

>>54813001
Based and autistic pilled.

>>54813001
https://www.paradigm.xyz/portfolio

>>54813001
Why isn't there a single major fund that straddles ETH and LINK and says they're both extremely important?
Why is everyone piled into the MEV circus and nobody is thinking longer term? Is it just because the free millions available at the moment are too intoxicating?

>>54813034
There's got to be some pride in there. "I'm doing the good thing, MEV serves a useful function and I am compensated for it and these guys are coming in and saying it's bad and want me to earn less money."

>>54813034
You said it. The money is just far too attractive to ignore. I honestly think if the MEV niggers think their cash cow is under a serious threat then I wouldn’t rule out physical violence as a retaliation. There’s a lot of money on the line, these psychos aren’t just going to complain on Twitter about it.

>>54813108
But what I mean is, where are the funds that say "OK the MEV carnival is free money now, but Chainlink is clearly the long play so we're going to have a foot in each camp and transition out from the scam casino into the 4IR when the time comes."

>>54813159
yeah, makes sense. I guess we don't know about those being quiet waiting to step in when FSS goes live and say, "hey, we believe this is a more fair way going forward, btw we've been accumulating Link this whole time."

>>54812714
kek so their plan to push alternative oracle narratives failed miserably after sergey btfo them at consensus, now they're going to push this absolute clown world shit "ackshually what if we don't use oracles at all guyz".

btc and eth maxis have completely lost the plot and look more retarded by the day.

>>54812726
this

Goal #1 - NO ORACLES

>>54813034
>>54813108
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

― Upton Sinclair

>>54813414
It’s all so petty and lame. Looking forward to seeing how this gets exploited.

>>54812714
Why are we still early after 6 years?

>>54813516
I got the sense from Consensus that Sergey himself thought that, by this point in time, he would be surrounded by an enthusiastic and growing movement of crypto idealists.
Instead nearly the entire industry is just grifter after grifter, who resent and oppose him for actually trying to make crypto's dream real.
It must be fucking exhausting.

>>54813490
>It’s all so petty and lame
welcome to crypto new fren

Oracle man bad!

I'm going to have to start making irl visits to these types of people

>>54813633
checked. if I see some accountant looking bro coming for me I know its over

These damned oracles are ruining everything! Aaarrrrggghhh

Sergey is responsible partially for this situation.
This naive thinking cost his supporter base great suffering and made him fail to gain sufficient power when it was still possible.
He is now fighting against every cartel with a destroyed supporter base.
The 1 year range LINK is in because of BTC dumps is the best description of this situation.

He should have added some realism to his plans.
He finally started to wake up, but it's far too late to change this space.
He now has to build everything alone which further increases the time for adoption and the US government is going all scorched earth on crypto delaying further adoption.

>>54813666
checked and horrors beyond imagination pilled

>>54813540
It seems crypto and the easy money mostly attracts greedy people with low morals.
You need a very strong belief system and healthy mindset to resist corruption from money and power and devs are the least likely to be healthy and stable people.
People who don't believe in something greater don't have the strength to resist corruption.

The reason I liked Chainlink is because it allowed me to bet on something which would improve the world, but I later discovered that I cared about money a lot more than I though.
But what would happen if I discovered later that Sergey betrayed us and was building a tool to enslave mankind?
Would I still want to support him even if what was manifested was a dystopia?

The ETH mafia lived to see their naive dreams changed into a corrupt system by their own greed.

>>54813714
I'm lovin' it.

>>54812884
They use Chainlink indirectly. They are mad all their Oracle price providers get their prices from Chainlink.

>>54812884
I remember a discussion about Maker having a form of liquidation bot front running scheme for their insiders.
Did Chainlink somehow foil that?

lol Flare killed it all

>>54813674
Sergey is "partially" responsible?

No he's 100% responsible. If he doesn't kill the price at $50 and kept momentum up, we reach triple digits easily and maintain market cap/rank. He is a greedy obese retard that cost himself a lot of support, he gets what he deserves

>>54813837
>NOOOO ORACLES ARE NOT NEEDED REEEEEE
pay up cucks

>>54813963
How so?

>>54812726
one of the best reaction gifs ever, it’s not possible to laugh harder than that. completely appropriate for this thread. kys OP

>>54812714
lost my biggest chunk in link, fuck devs , just don't why they keep dumping it. Ethtards just fucking stick their heads in vitalki's ass. I'm sure eth and link will both are important, with some privacy from railgun. zk, can be a real cash cow too.

>>54813034
>Is it just because the free millions available at the moment are too intoxicating?
Yes. Its partly self-fulfilling prophecy. No one really believes in this space - some might do tentatively but the MEV aspect of Eth just make it look like a scammy joke. Can never really be the "future of money" and they know it. So make as much as you can while you can and get out. Obviously chainlink think differently but thats why they're not getting the hype traction and people will side with the MEV mafia because you can make real money NOW off it.

chainlink insulted the gods
it is now fated to rule the underworld forever (the 5-9 dollar range)

His solution still requires oracles lol
He's just butthurt that Chainlink took over the oracle space.

>>54814857
What is his vision of a “user” as someone with the technological literacy to choose their fucking oracle providers lmao

>>54813674
this
they had all the steam behind and all eyes on them for a while
he needed way more aggression
i dare to say after the first smartcon nothingburger event it was over
maybe sergey should have an experienced ceo who is ruthless

in his last spech he sounded angry yes but more like in a frustrated and powerless way instead of a we coming for your head way

Crypto is so full of cynical grifters now I wonder if they’ll even be able to gain hype in the next bull. I hope the next bull is the official crowning of Link because normalfags seem to be pessimistic about it all

>>54813991
what exactly did Sergey do wrong?

>>54814932
what should have been done differently. every defi protocol that matters uses LINK oracles. what else shouldve been done lmao

>>54812714

>>54814984
Didn't let VCs in cheap
Did let 4chan autists

>>54813674
>He is now fighting against every cartel with a destroyed supporter base.
The Chainlink supporter base was always broken.
They're the ones that actively campaigned for Chainlink to have as little normie exposure as possible.

>>54814996
He doesn't have a clue. The closest thing to an answer is some shit like "he should burn tokens".

>>54814857
Holy shit what a disgusting snake he is

>>54813663
The sicario movies were sick as hell.
I hope they make the 3rd soon

>>54814857
Wait what... Why would a user want to be encumbered with yet another decision + risk of fucking up? As if crypto isn't already harsh enough lmao
>yeah bro just choose your own oracle (and just trust us that our "no oracle" oracles won't frontrun your shit)

>>54815011
Definitely part of it. If /biz/ hadn't taken "le secret club" approach it might have attracted enough normie interest for us to have more talking heads speaking up for link and growing network effects.
/biz/ made its bed with muh ironic fud and now it gets to lie in it.

>>54815320
Based VCs and the MEV mafia take le secret club approach with every crypto though. How come its a problem when /biz/ does it on an open source mice harvesting forum?

>>54815410
Because the VCs are making money and /biz/ cucked themselves out of making money.

>>54812884
they refused to use chainlink then got oracle exploited and have been seething ever since

>>54815320
Every single crypto influencer has a gag order for Chainlink and thats why they only talk about short-term price action and don’t speculate on what the team is actually trying to accomplish. That or they are just retarded.

sergey is getting more erratic (and louder) every speech, he knows the jig is up

>our project is kingmade and the chosen one!
>the elites have hand picked chainlink to bring us the 4IR!!
>b-b-but also the elites HATE chainlink with a passion and what to suppress it and destroy it!!
the duality of the deranged bagholder

>>54815582
>Eth trannies, MEV fags and shady VCs
>Elite
Lmao.

>>54815634
so the elites behind chainlink such as Sandro Salsano, Blythe Masters, Eric Schmidt and organizations such as WEF and SWIFT are at the mercy of some Eth trannies, MEV fags and some unnamed shady VCs, entirely powerless to stop them from ruining their chosen and fundamental industry infrastructure protocol.
yeah makes complete sense.

>>54815646
How are they at mercy of anything, LINK already won. Its a waiting game now

>>54812714
smoking in restaurants was the height of civilization

>>54815646
Looks like they don't really care enough to get some cypherpunk trannies in line, and they are still happy to work with Chainlink despite them. I don't see how these two can't be true at the same time.

>>54815715
oh now we're back to "LINK won already years ago so nothing really matters!". Then why complain about MEV trannies? They're irrelevant, right?
>>54815737
Then why are they allowing some cypherpunk trannies to hinder and jeopardize the project's growth and viability? What the fuck is even the point?

>>54815749
Your guess is as good as mine anon.

>>54815750
my guess is that all this is unironic bagholder cope
If the elites are actually behind chainlink there's zero incentive for them to allow smaller fish to play with their chosen and carefully crafted "truth arbiter"
zero sense

>>54815758
Who are these "Elites"? First you seem to imply ETH devs and VCs preying on L1/L2 value are on the same level as SWIFT, WEF, Eric Schmidt et al, displaying severe ignorance on your part. Then you go on to imply it's all bagholder cope, while anyone can see that these institutions and people actually are excited about Chainlink and have made that clear via official channels. How is that bagholder cope?

You are rationalizing facts away, which ironically enough is an actual coping mechanism.

>>54815781
>Who are these "Elites"
I've named them already
>Sandro Salsano, Blythe Masters, Eric Schmidt and organizations such as WEF and SWIFT
>First you seem to imply ETH devs and VCs preying on L1/L2 value are on the same level as SWIFT, WEF, Eric Schmidt et a
actually you're the only one making that implication here.
>while anyone can see that these institutions and people actually are excited about Chainlink
there's a distinct difference between showing some kind of interest on the project and claiming that these "groups have appointed Chainlink as the chosen one years ago", that's what I call bagholder cope and it simply cannot be true if irrelevant grifters are allowed to fuck with allegedly the most important piece of technology in the space.
Exercise some common sense here

>>54815758
chainlink is still in alpha/ beta phase, and the cryptoeconomic security incentives arn't deployed yet. why would they step in, if it's not yet ready? they need staking v1 and ccip v1 to actually have legit motives to step in. meanwhile, even after 6 years, i am still accumulating every week.

never selling

>>54815792
>actually you're the only one making that implication here.
No, you made that equation here:
>>54815582
>>b-b-but also the elites HATE chainlink with a passion and what to suppress it and destroy it!!
This is you implying "the elites" are ETH devs and VCs, because they are very obviously not fond of Chainlink, as the OP pic shows.

>there's a distinct difference between showing some kind of interest on the project and claiming that these "groups have appointed Chainlink as the chosen one years ago
I don't hold this opinion so it's a moot point, but to play devil's advocate: you can be "the chosen one" and "kingmade" and still receive little to no support. It can just mean that you are the preferred tool/platform/manufacturer/organization tasked with fulfilling a certain role or niche. If you fail, another preferred candidate will be put forward.

It's a very big game and currently, smart contracts are a very little part of it. The fact that it registers at all on the radar of the elite is enough proof for me we have something real here.

>>54815833
>>54815839
>chainlink is still in alpha/ beta phase
>If you fail, another preferred candidate will be put forward
both of these statements imply that success is not given and that a possibility of Chainlink failing exists, something that completely contradicts the narrative /biz/ has constructed over the past 6 years. Thanks.
>smart contracts are a very little part of it
Considering that the primary function of an oracle is to facilitate secure input of off chain data into a smart contract, I'd say that it's very disheartening realizing that 8 years after inception and despite all the numerous projections and forecasts, smart contracts remain useless.
Anyway you do you, I'm positively done with this project and this "community".

>>54815872
>both of these statements imply that success is not given and that a possibility of Chainlink failing exists,
Yes. Though I think it is unlikely considering Chainlink's connections, which is why I invested.
>something that completely contradicts the narrative /biz/ has constructed over the past 6 years. Thanks.
Translation:
>Waaaah waaaah waaaahhhhh
Good riddance anon.

>>54815872
>smart contracts remain useless
I use smart contracts to swap tokens, to stake tokens, to leverage trade, to move between chains, to lend.
There’s this crazy blindness caused by delusional demands for instant riches that seems to take over people. Think about where we were 5 years ago. Cryptokitties.
Internet development between 1985-1999 was the same thing but people didn’t see it the same way because they weren’t overinvested to the hilt and relying on it to save their mediocre life.
The smart contract S curve hasn’t even taken off yet, but it’s starting to.
These processes take years. Are “investors” more ADHD than ever, or are they just more desperate because the world seems much more dire?

>>54815904
Seeing that these "connections" are not enough to either discourage bad actors from targeting Chainlink or to cause some kind for significant price movements, I'd say they're worthless and you shouldn't count on them too much.

Been here since 2020, never bought link. These threads are always full of autist sniffing there own farts but link has had terrible price action since I've been in the space. Did all you niggers get in at the ICO and are just salty about everything or what?

>>54815917
Allow me to rephrase, they're useless for real world applications.

>>54815923
Got in at the ICO. Had desktop and laptop open with 2 wallets and forgot to increase my gas price but still got one of the two through.

>>54815926
And what are the engineering problems that keep them currently useless? Are those problems insurmountable? Are they being worked on?
You should look at the “state of crypto” dashboard to see what’s actually going on, beyond price action. Get an idea of developer interest.
And if developer interest is high, if the problems are just discrete engineering problems that can be solved, and if people are working on them, then it’s literally just a matter of time.

>>54815926
Without oracles, yes they are.

>>54815942
11 hundred devs currently signed up to chainlinks hackathon anon if that isnt interest I don't know what is

Oracles are needed. The token isn't.

>>54815965
t. not Vitalik

>>54815971
Vitalik hasn't had a clue for decades now bro literal boomer needs to stfu and let the younger based crowd dev on

>>54815977
Vitalik has hated Chainlink since 2017, but even he has to admit an oracle system needs its own token just as a blockchain needs its own coin.

>>54815922
>or to cause some kind for significant price movements
>price movements
it always comes back to the same utterly retarded and both revealing argument: price
matters a lot to you doesnt it, means absolutely nothing to the success of link
how many times must it be repeated that the price is at the moment completely detached from the utility of the network
yes this is sergeys fault for failing to deliver despite promising to do so
but nothing in the price charts means that chainlink is doing badly as a project, its security is still flawless and its adoption is growing despite ever louder shrieking and gnashing of teeth of the reluctant other market actors

right now the choice is simple use chainlink or get hack or frontran, maybe even both
the project is over when its security gets compromised as after 7 years there is still nobody else that can compete with them
this is why swift doesnt give a fuck about twitter posts by jeets the project technical function is supreme and stands a giant above the rest of the field

yes this sucks immensely for us tho because as >>54815917 said
>or are they just more desperate because the world seems much more dire?
shit is getting fucked out there and we are living in the mess

>>54816027
>price doesn't matter
okay anon

>>54813384
But no one is going to use oracles.

>>54816030
again to you it matters a lot
now show me where price matters in link oracles bring correct data onchain or devs being onboarded
it'll be interesting to see what the discord can scramble up

>>54816030
Price doesnt matter to us

Simply never selling

>>54815942
>“state of crypto” dashboard
this is a completely useless metric that goes up in bullruns and down in bears, tell me, what kind of technological innovation has this space experienced since 2018? Because according to your dashboard, development has almost doubled from then, yet for some bizarre reason, they can't even solve scaling.
>>54816062
>>54816076
your response is literally the typical
>price doesn't matter, I'm in it for the tech
You really want a serious response to this? I don't give a flying fuck about "the tech", and no serious investor ever does. If your thesis is correct and LINK lives up to the expectations at some point in long term future let's say 10 years in total, you'd still be wrong for allocating your capital to LINK 10 years earlier.
Being extremely early means you were wrong.

>>54816084
Im in it because i want to see cucks like you be enslaved by Smart Contracts (powered by Chainlink)

>>54816084
very hard deflection
i never said i am in it for the tech, i specifically stated this setup sucks hard for us
but the thread was about the failure of the project and that has nothing to do with price
so if the project is succeeding at all the things it set out to do, weak price action doesnt stop the growth of the project
what anon does that mean for the future prospects
if this is the best the discord can come up with i am of disappoint

the rest of your waah waah is just drivel as we cant time the inflection point but if all measurable indicators say stuff is growing its better to be early then late

>>54816102
>LINK already won
>DR;NS
>nolinkers are cucks lol
thanks for your contribution
>>54816107
>so if the project is succeeding at all the things it set out to do
it isn't, there's no staking with slashing and reputation, there's no functional DON with DECO, not to even mention that the DON isn't really "decentralized" at all, no smart contracts for derivatives, no smart contracts for insurance, not a single enterprise is using LINK to facilitate real world applications through smart contracts.
>very hard deflection
you deflected first by ignoring the fact that "connections" do fuck all for the project in any tangible ways.

>>54816115
now you are both straight up lying and shifting the goalposts so hard you'll need a teamster crew to carry them

this thread went from link is dying to no link is actually being alive only all these things havent been done yet, quite a large shift
we have already explained that price pumps are pointless so your connections mention is retarded

love to see them squirm when even the simplest inquiry shows their argument to be retarded and wrong and then they have to shift the whole argument to another level
no shill i am not going to bother tpying out what the issue is with all the buzzwords you used: the thread was about link dying and it objectively is not

>>54816145
>lashing out in anger with rampant projection
>link isn't dying because the team might finally deliver on their promises from 6 year ago
>price action should be ignored
okay anon, stellar arguments

>>54816153
>>link isn't dying because the team might finally deliver on their promises from 6 year ago
No, Link isn't dying because it dominates the oracle space.

>>54816168
>it dominates the oracle space
>while smart contracts aren't even used
cognitive dissonance

>>54816170
>smart contracts aren't even used
lol what?

>>54816175
???
name a single enterprise using smart contracts to facilitate real world applications
I'll wait

>>54816181
>smart contracts aren't being used!
>I mean enterprises aren't using smart contracts!!

Put the goalposts back where you found them lol

>>54816190
>le goalposts
I've been saying that from the start of this thread, read up before you shitpost

>>54812714
>Would explain why LINK is dying.
Probably heading back to where it belongs since they got no working products. Oracles aren't needed in the data economy. Ocean protocol and Allianceblock have already started actualizing the dream.

>>54816153
everyone at this point knows you are a retard arguing in bad faith, but do keep up the shitshow its amusing at least, i like the occasional lolcow
you guys are at least milkable the low effort cuck posters arent even entertaining

but do hurry back to the discord to get update instructions here cause the argument is falling apart

>>54816195
What you said earlier itt has nothing to do with this: >>54816168

>>54816227
and your response has nothing to do with what I said, nor did I move any goalposts>>54815926
stop intervening in conversations other people have or at least try to read the entire thread before doing so, you triggered sperglord

>>54816241
Link dominates the oracle space as it exists today.
Considering that Chainlink was always an oracle project, that means it's the furthest removed from "dying" as it can be in the current crypto market.

>>54816241
aave isnt a real world application its all in my head
daily trading volumes with fees in the giant numbers arent real world
oh nooos it only counts when the pricing sticker on my estrogen in the local basedmerie gets updated with an oracle that the technology is real world

>>54816252
cool, and all I'm saying is that is the equivelant of Ranjeesh dominating the street cleaning space on some villages on the outskirts of Mumbai, an impressive feat but ultimately meaningless.
>a shitty defi farming and lending casino is "real world application"
it isn't
>giant trading volumes
it's all fake washtrading
>it only counts when
the price goes up, yes

>>54816276
>crypto today is shit
>therefore Chainlink is shit

here we go

>>54816283
>crypto today is shit
>chainlink is part of crypto
you're beginning to understand it seems
>nnnoooo chainlink isn't shit cause they might deliver all the promised features at some point in the future, so keep on hodling!!1
here we go again...

>>54816289
>all of crypto is shit and dying
>therefore Chainlink is also dying

great argument against Chainlink (ticker: LINK), my friend.

>>54816289
>nnnoooo chainlink isn't shit cause they might deliver all the promised features at some point in the future, so keep on hodling
out those goalposts back, the entire thread has been about chainlink dying yes or no, not gains for token holders

>the same arguments over and over and over

>>54816296
>chainlink heavily relies on the entire ecosystem's success
>but chainlink is fine despite the fact that crypto as a whole is useless outside of speculation
okay
>>54816301
>price doesn't matter REEEEEEEE
relax anon, you're going to have a brain aneurysm if you keep up

>>54816241
Git gud at sophistry anon. This is embarrassing.

>>54816311
>crypto as a whole is useless outside of speculation
>therefore Chainlink bad

I bet you have no idea how ridiculous you look.

>>54816315
it takes one sophist to know one, jewnigger chainlink cheerleader
>>54816317
yes unironically

>>54816309
I'm sorry anon, here check this out.
Chainlink is very good and you should buy more!
better now?

>>54816321
You have 20 posts talking in-depth about Chainlink, and your argument is "crypto bad, therefore Chainlink bad".

Take a step back and look at what you're doing.

>>54816330
I'm elaborating on why Chainlink has failed in my opinion. AFAIK Chainlink is part of the crypto industry, therefore all my criticisms are valid.
Check and mate.

>>54816321
I pulled fair amount of pil on this board, so yes I do know a bad attempt at sophistry when I see one. Hi again by the way, angry bagholder anon who calls anyone not perpetually pessimistic a cheerleader.

>>54816337
>Chainlink dominates the oracle space
>"Chainlink has failed"

pls choose one

>>54816338
>I'm a gaslighting jewnigger
cool
>hi again, boogeyman xyz!11
hello, Michael?
>>54816348
>Ranjeesh dominates the street cleaning industry on his village
>Ranjeesh hasn't failed despite his original goal being to monopolize the cleaning services on the entirety of Mumbai.

pls choose one

>>54816328
>Chainlink is very good and you should buy more!
>better now?
Well someone has to buy it

>>54816366
keep it up anon!

mitwits still holding link long past its expiry really think they're smarter than people who managed to make money in both 2017 and 2021.
funny what dangerous levels of estrogen does to a man.

>>54815749
>attempting logic at baggies

>>54816471
>sophistry
>logic

>>54816358
>24 pbtid

Every time kek

>>54816598
your tears are delicious

Link is a token for raging cuckolds who can't accept they got scammed by Sergey

They will keep moving the goalposts forever while they baghold their heavy bags

>>54816665
>tears (of laughter)
24pbtid anon has been thoroughly smacked and humiliated by everyone he argued with ITT.

>>54813666
milady fags are running their own grift.

>>54815011
>>54815320
nu fags

>>54816715
>n-n-no I'm aksually laffin lolz
kek, you're so insecure you had to stalk the thread to respond you crying faggot.
>s-see how ((we)) ganged up on him lol fudder rekt!

>>54816715
>humiliated
nice projection
hi btw Thomas!

>>54816775
I've been in this thread for hours. Did you switch ids?

>>54816775
just call the Link baggies cuckolds

They hate it because they know it's the truth lol

>>54816775
>n-no YOU care more about Chainlink!

>>54816790
Isn't Thomas the Geoxadem porn addict? I didn't think calling you out on your "cheerleader" quip would hurt you this bad btw kek

>>54816794
>>54816804
>triggered bagholders can't stop responding
lmao keep crying faggots
>$6.88

>>54816809
>you're hurt!
keep projecting Rory??

>>54815872
You cannot invest in something guaranteed to succeed and also make exponential gains retard.

>>54812714
TLDR for the jeet link holders who are trying to learn English but struggling
>token not needed

>>54816084
Nobody is in it for the tech. I suspect autists are in it and fud specifically so impatient midwit retards like yourself obsessed with opportunity cost rekt themselves chasing trends and viewing themselves as an elite trader because they can calculate how rich they’d be if they bought eth or shib at the bottom. Because 10 years to never have to work again with a 4 figure investment was too difficult, and makes you a loser.

>>54816965
>impatient midwit retards obsessed with opportunity cost
spare me with that shit, I've been a holder for 1400 days and counting, for crypto this is a lifetime.

>>54817233
Kek I knew it was you, cheerleader anon.

>>54816181
https://www.eib.org/en/press/all/2021-141-european-investment-bank-eib-issues-its-first-ever-digital-bond-on-a-public-blockchain

>>54817264
why did you delete it?
>>54817237
I don't know who that is, but I'm guessing he's a recent addition to the never ending list of nefarious personas you keep inventing

>>54817233
lol all of this bitching about investing and now you admit you couldnt even read an eth/X chart in the year of our lord 2020
you should stop posting you are only embarrassing yourself further as apparently the only way to cope with this affliction you find in fudding people for free on here lol
at least the jump capital guys get paid for their efforts

>>54813029
>Citadel Securities

>>54816965
I'm in it for the tech. Do you know why? Because since the Canadian govt froze the bank accounts of protestors i realised that was going to be the "humane" way to stifle dissent moving forward, and I anticipate a future where the government simply "turns money off" for people it doesn't like, at whim.
And that as little faith as I have in the current administration, I have even less in 2,3, or 4 administrations into the future.
So I'm in it for the tech, because value, literally any sort of value, that I can access outside of government control could constitute a lifeline against a future authoritarian regime.

>>54817233
Wait 1400 days in crypto and you still haven’t made it????? LMAOOOOOOOO

>>54817287
Nope. We had a very similar discussion a while ago where you also spoke of cheerleading and mentioned the exact amount of days you had been holding. Keep on venting anon, but in moderation. Too much seething is not good for you.

>>54817290
>>54817332
who said I didn't take any profits? I'm not going to bother responding to every ad hom you pull out of your ass in a desperate attempt to deflect from my arguments btw.
>>54817354
>every poster on /biz/ is the same person
have you considered the possibility that other holders might think alike? no?

>>54817386
>ave you considered the possibility that other holders might think alike?
Sure, but are you really going to deny posting in this exact manner before? Come on now friend.

>>54817411
yes, I'm not the guy you think I am, and this is a testament to how progressively deranged you are getting.

I think Chainlink is a good project

>>54817423
Alright anon. See you next thread.

>>54817452
okay, CLG??? Crypto Oracle??Run the Jewlz?? Mayor Stinky??
see you next thread.

>>54817429
I think Chainlink is a cuckold cult

>>54817471
You called me CLG and Crypto Oracle as well last time. You couldn't believe I didn't keep up with those guys. Twitter really did rot your brain, didn't it.

>>54817491
>shilling this hard for a token that will be $2 soon
Cringe af kys nigger.
Also I love jews.

>>54817471
>31 pbtid
>5 hours
>nothing but low iq gaslighting and lies
How does it feel knowing that at the end of all this and the inevitable link singularity happens - your location and id will be bought by some mentally ill og and youll end up v& and forced to read your own posts as you're getting your teeth pulled lmao

>>54817491
>he doesn't understand tongue in cheek sarcasm
>he proceeds to ramble about his origin backstory with that made up persona
jesus christ, your autism is off the charts
ok CLG ;)
>>54817631
>nothing but low iq gaslighting and lies
you quoted the wrong id, gaslighting prick

>>54817668
Post the screencap of your buy in dates next

>>54817687
post another retweet?

>>54817736
Wouldn't you like that, twitterboy

>>54816153
This comment is embarrassing.

So to summarize, shillers say they're "winning" despite being 90% down on their investment because shitcoin companies use Link services to check prices and somehow that's important. Anyone who's against this is one of various biz "personalities" who's sole existence is to disrupt all of the "winning".

"Fudders" point out the horrific investment (90% down) and how no one in actual business uses Link. All of this is true.


Hmm... who should I side with?

>>54817926
>"Fudders" point out the horrific investment (90% down)
What happens if my average buy in is below $0.60? Does it become a terrific investment again?
>and how no one in actual business uses Link. All of this is true.
LINK is being used right as we speak. Why does that bother people so?

>>54817926
baggies have turned into typical altcoin "in it for the tech" copers
meanwhile high-t investors have cut their bags years ago and have moved on

there's no reason to ever think about old alts in this market

>>54817811
>comment
go back to YouTube

>>54818106
>CONFORM TO THE CORRECT 4CHAN APPROVED BUZZWORDS!!
Pathetic.

>>54817926
90% down from what, exactly?

>>54818193
as opposed to conforming to the appropriate ChainLink /biz/ approved buzzwords?

>>54818241
Where is this conformation demanded, retard?

>>54818254
in every LINK thread, moron

>>54818333
Provide a single (1) example.

>>54818382
>nnooooooooo where are your sources?
embarrasing
lurk moar

>>54818389
>can't show a single case of his low IQ fantasy
Pathetic.

>>54818437
>won't go back to tiktok
cringeworthy

>>54818467
You're only further embarrassing yourself with this impotent flailing.

>>54813034
>Why isn't there a single major fund that straddles ETH and LINK and says they're both extremely important?
Only VC I know of who does is Framework. They don't talk about Chainlink much but they've been vocal in the past and currently run a node.

>>54818500
>impotent penis
Nice Freudian slip

>>54818576

>>54818594

>>54812726
This is what a schizo looks like when he is proven wrong. He creates some exaggerated expression to try to prove his point, because words and logic and evidence all point in the opposite direction.

>>54818576
>40pbtid
Get a hobby Lmao

>>54818642
thread still up, lets check on its progress
>40 pbtid
getting extremely embarassing, well this thread has now moved from lolcow into total cringe
good luck with your life anon, nobody even the dumbest newfag could be convinced there are people here fudding an investment they dont have any stake in for half a waking day without some hidden motive, be it either payment or mental derangement

>>54813928
They bent the knee after getting BTFO'd.

>>54816076
this
just happily staking

>>54813034
Because funds are all about guaranteed returns in the here and now, they invest in projects that are on a slow and steady rise rather than projects that are too volatile/risky.
Funds will likely be very late to the party.

>>54814857
>Say something
>I should clarify, that something could be anything
Great stuff Greg!!

>>54817480
The cuckold that's piloted by dickold Sergey. After spotting Nexera protocol driven by Ajaja, I don't think I'm gonna fall for that duckold again.

>>54812714
>7 trillion through network in 2022 bear market
>cash flow positive and swimming in cash in bear market
>dozens of services and APIs across blockchain and traditional systems
Yeah lol

>>54817926
yeah Link shills are cringe and pathetic

chad "fudders" simply need to pull up a Link chart to BTFO them and their shitcoin

>>54817969
>What happens if my average buy in is below $0.60? Does it become a terrific investment again?

What happens is you're down hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars. So no it doesn't become terrific. If we were still in late '20 it would be, but now it's not. So barring a time machine, you're out of luck. You know the saying, timing is everything...


>>54818219
Down from the $50s dog. Here you go: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/chainlink