/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54784958
about tree fiddy eoy

>>54784958
It's unironically a single digit token

People who claim Link will pump to triple digits are delusional baggies who are coping because they didn't sell in may 2021. Altcoins never recover to their previous ATH, everyone who isn't a newfag knows this

>>54785088
bro you reply to every Chainlink thread in milliseconds, and then reply some more with a different ID right after, more than likely while I'm typing this post you already made another post with your phone, really makes one think

ATH by end of year. 2024 summer 100 dollars. 2025 summer 300 dollars.
1k by 2029.

>>54785216
Yeah, people in 2029 will pay $1k for a price feed update.

Most likely: $5.3-9.64
Possible: $9.65-13.0
Least likely: $1.5-4.9

>>54784958
$224 top of this cycle

>>54784958
i could see a run to $30 this year. not much more though. tripple digits sometime in 2024-2025

>>54785388
hmm. some anon posted about a $34 coffee in ny the other day. triple digits ny coffee 2024-5
>Verification not required.

>>54785420
America is bleeding out

>>54785428
that’s the fella

>>54785167
ok but hes not wrong tho
you cannot refute his arguments so you just critique his enthusiastic and creative posting style
sure seems kinda desperate on your part...
just sayin...

>>54784958
If you want a real answer within a couple years..
Chain link had 7trillion USD Flow through and be secured by their network in 2022 during the bear market.
I expect it to flip BTC and be at least 3trillion MC (1000x)
The rest depends on how much it gets adopted

>>54785321
Lol, they would change it to be fractions of a link token or allow other tokens to be used then swapped into link automatically to keep it at a fixed stable coin level price, not a fixed unit of link tokens

>>54787373
Lol
Google has a 1.3T market cap

>>54785321
Yep same as with ETH. People were paying cents for transactions and Vitalik said BTC costs are ridiculous but then look what happened with ETH fees. Nowadays I think it costs a million dollars just to do a simple swap and MEV bandits claim 90% of that

>>54787530
What's the market cap of HTTPS? And by market cap I mean how much energy via electricity has been used to transfer data within the protocols parameter's?

>>54787555
checked. $1,999,999.95 simply to get 5 cents

>>54784958
$250 2026
$330 2030

In before muh link being suppressed

>>54784958
25K EOY
THE SWITCH TO CBDCS HAPPENS
TRADFI INTERACTS WITH BLOCKCHAINS THROUGH CHAINLINK
CCIP BECOMES A WORLD STANDARD
TOKENIZED SECURITIES AND COMMODITIES EVERYWHERE
GRANT PROGRAM MASSIVELY INCREASES STAKING INCENTIVES
STAKING EFFECTIVELY REDUCES THE CIRCULATING SUPPLY
PRICE INCREASES EXPONENTIALLY
1K IS FUD

I SAW IT
IT WAS REVEALED TO ME IN A DREAM
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>54787660
This is bullshit but I believe it.

>>54787660
Absolute madman

>>54784958

Total crypto market cap last top: 1,638 billion (nov 9 2021)

% of market cap for top 10 biggest projects during last top:
>Bitcoin: 43.04%
>Ethereum: 19.42%
>BNB: 3.83%>Tether: 2.61%
>Solana: 2.58%
>Cardano: 2.42%
>XRP: 1.99%
>USD Coin: 1.22%
>Dogecoin: 1.22%
>Polygon: 0.43%
>Others: 21.24%

Asume crypto market cap 2x last top: 1,638 billion x 2 = 3,276 billion (being generous kek)

Let’s assume chainlink goes to place #10 (lol) and keeps the same market cap % as last top.

That’d mean:

Assuming #10 crypto project (link):
>#10 market cap % next top = 0.43%
>total market cap next top = 3,276 billion
>#10 project market cap = 3,276 billion * 0.0043 = 14 billion
>current link circulating supply = 0.5 billion link (and that’s if they don’t dilute it, but you know they will dump more link)

>LINK PRICE NEXT RUN = 14 billion / 0.5 billion link = $28 united state rorrah per link

LMAOOOOOOO what a shitty coin

>>54787922
Checked but Chainlink is a token, not a coin.

>>54787935
Looks more like pure shit desu senpai

But yeah, link token is going to $28 next run, it seems. That if jump crypto doesn’t short it.

Link might go higher if you report jump to the SEC like you did with nexo, up to you stinkers, I don’t have a horse in this race

>>54787935
Yeah well your butthole is a bussy, not an anus.

>>54784958
410 top, then dump forever

>>54787922
I thought we all agreed this kind of bs bored fudding is beyond retarded at this point. Maybe pick up a real life hobby, anon.

>>54788247
>gay words

Sorry anon, provide hard numbers or fuck off. Or… don’t tell me you’re feeling scared of link not going above $50 again? YOU ARE? HAHAHAHHA

>>54787660
RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH

>>54787922
Few things,
1. You want to look at moving Link to ETH/BTC when it tops out.
2. This doesn't account for link locked in staking

>>54788333
>1. You want to look at moving Link to ETH/BTC when it tops out.
nah, thats dumb

>>54788387
Assume link did what it did last time, pumps on its own while everything crabs. Would it not be ideal to move it into btc or eth while they moon (link topped out sep 2020 against btc) and then move it back into link later?

>>54788333
>1. You want to look at moving Link to ETH/BTC when it tops out.
That would only dilute the circulation supply making the price go down

>2. This doesn't account for link locked in staking
You mean the measly 25 million locked in staking? The ones that will probably be dumped as soon as Sergey lets people unstake once the top is near? LMAO

>>54788428
swingies get the rope. you can risk it. but eventually there's going to be that swing where you get priced out like the eth guy crying about eth being over $100. it's not worth the risk if you're not retarded and have figured out that LINK is a once in a lifetime opportunity. the goal should always be to get more LINK, and not risk it on a greedy swing

>>54784958
$100 eoy
$3k eoy 2024
$10k mid 2025
$81k eoy 2029

>>54788699
Checked

>>54784958
$0.00 possibly less.

>>54788680
>>54788699
Chainlink advocates doing damage control on chinklink kek

How the fuck is link gonna go up to $100? Do you niggers even know how to count to 100?

>>54784958
The way it's shilled here...zero in a couple of years.

>>54788728
>How the fuck is link gonna go up to $100? Do you niggers even know how to count to 100?

The question you should be asking is - How isn't it going to go to $100. It's not about how high you can count, it's about how intelligent and capable you are of comprehending the facts that have been laid out in front of you. I don't pity you, but you are worthy of pity.

Just expect a huge selloff at $50

>>54788728
I don't hold chinkstink but if Serge stops dumping on them for one bullrun they could probably get a pity pump over 100. Of course that's because of market momentum, since BTC will be at 250k according to current trajectories.

>>54788802
You keep writing gay words, but I don’t see any gay numbers along with them.

Are you even able to provide hard numbers to justify your hope of link going to $100?

Nigger, don’t send me another wall of homosexual hopium words. You melanin rich individuals are so silly, next type you’re probably try to appeal to my emotions by sending a rap song or something KEK

Pain and suffering, also doom.

>>54788835
Anon, care to provide any numbers to justify the theoretically possible pity pump to $100? Because I just don’t see that happening

>>54784958
crabbing from $5-10 until the end of time.

>>54784958
As outlined in the whitepaper, Chainlink operates best when the LINK token is about the price of a cup of coffee, and the team will balance their use of reserves with the node incentives to make sure it doesn't go too much lower or higher than that target. So I expect this to continue.

>>54784958

Holder since 2017
Not only is 1k not a meme
But I'm starting to think we have been blessed with the most insane investment of all time, that will alter humanity's future
Not kidding
This is not a fucking stock, this is something incredibly special, and im in shock that the applicable use cases continue to grow for this incel token.

Like this tokens mcap will go to many trillions of "dollars" (whatever that will mean in 50 years). Need to remember also that vast majority will be staked and lower circ supply by alot.

>>54784958
1000 dollars by eoy

>>54787922
This is a good framework, but accounting for all the things yet to be PRICED IN and staking lockup, we should see a LINK dominance of at least 5% (larger than all alt L1s and L2s). Thus 3,276*0,05/0,5 = $327,6/LINK

>>54784958
ATH aint happening this year, I have come to make peace with this while I invest in based privacy alts till the bull season comes.

>>54787627
At world end?

>>54787660
You think the introduction od CBDCs will favour crypto this much? You must be delusional, only based privacy projects such as Monero, Zcash, Railgun and the likes will benefit from that shitshow cos we all going under the radar.

>>54784958
>all these hopeful anons
I’m happy for you but personally I have gotten to a point where I almost have written off Link completely. This clown market is a joke. At least I can still piss off fudders with my links.

>>54790208
Have you watched Sergeys latest talk? He complains and complains about bad actors and how they’ll fuck over normies on the crypto space and then he proceeds to mention he’ll do nothing to advertise link as a solution, but instead he’ll wait until the next FTX happens and people see the chainlink network as the solution to minimize trust.

Sergey is a lazy faggot when it comes to getting new clients. It’s definitely not looking good for the price

>>54790391
Just hodl anon, WAGMI link hodlers. Tho I also hodl sui stack of XMR and RAIL.

>>54788818
pretty reasonable

>>54788728
>muh Chainlink advocates!!
You know you can just, like, ignore Link threads, right?
You’ll avoid 99% of these advocates.
But you won’t, because you’re obsessed with Chainlink.

When stakers start recieving build program airdrops where do you think that money will go? It will be naturaly reinvested into link, as will all staking rewards causing an ongoing loop. Next, Anons here will fomo hard into link excellerating this loop wanting to get a piece of the action. Once it starts it will take your breath away. More and more link will be locked and and you retards will sell your own grandmothers to buy link. If you cant see this coming then you are......(fill in dots)...r*****ed


>>54790398
Lazy Faggot? 30 partners in the build program? Wtf you moron?

>>54790391
This, I'm twenty four years old, when I bought link I was nineteen years old, I'm losing my god-dammed mind.

>>54787592
And how much of that amount actually went to the developers of HTTPS?

>>54790709
Congratulations. You'll still be young by the time you're insanely wealthy. Try not to fuck it up.

T. 39

>>54790741
I only have 500 link. At best I can be rich in section 8.

>>54790749
Well. Maybe you'll be mid 30s by the time that's retirement/escape the pods money.

>>54784958
>Chainlink peaks at 100 dollars
>Sergey Dumps his final bag
>Moves to Asia
>Settles down with his family of transgender ladyboys, 1 from each asian country (Not India)
>Spends half of his fortune funding transgender birth research
>Creates super race born of transgender mothers.
>Spends the rest of his days laughing at NEETs
>Sorry No Refunds

>>54790904
I'll likely be dead by then because I'm full of rage.

1k eoy or you’re a scammer Tenboro

>>54784958
$10 is imminent
And they're fucking sitting their pretty ass in my pf, alongside EGLD, RUNE, and RIDE, and more, besides the latter and former are all in staking in my ledger wallet, see y'all in one year time.

>>54784958
chainlink will be used by middle managers.
so when digital currency becomes law.
any link marines will get jobs in middle management or they will cucj middle managers with fees.

>>54790938
Go pay an Asian gilf for a prostate massage. Guarantee that will help.

>>54787555
Swaps are $10-20 depending on complexity right now

$0.20 on Arbitrum and optimism (doesn't spike). $0.01 on Polygon or Metis (kind of shitty though)

>>54791126
No thanks. Hate keeps me alive and well, it makes sure that I never make a mistake, and trust a shitskin, I always carry guns.

>>54784958
I'd be happy ending this year solidly $20-35, i think we'll see a gradual climb up to that range.

End of next year into 2025 will be the cycle peak and i think that will probably be $100-200. I generally think the next run will disappoint a lot of people but if you consider the reducing returns and how many projects have basically dropped back to their pre-2021 run price I don't see it as likely we go way higher.

At the same time though next cycle crash won't be major at all.

>>54787660
based

>>54784958
Unironically $1000 EOY

>ITT delusional cuckolds hoping their heavy bags will randomly moon

>>54785444
>you can not refute arbitrary price predictions

Him saying it’s a single digit coin is as valid as someone else saying it’s a 500 digit coin. Stop being a retard and wasting digits.

>>54790709
My young fren, I’m 27 now. If there’s any advice I can give you is to push yourself in any way you can to get to a good wageslave position, even if it’s temporary.
When you reach my age, you start to mellow out and not give a fuck anymore. But you also start appreciating the little things in life. Keep working and keep on investing, that’s the only thing we have.

>>54791701
forced meme

>>54790643
>But you won’t, because you’re obsessed with Chainlink.
Yes

>>54790676
OHH WOWSERS! 30 “PARTNERS” (not even clients) in 5 years!!? OOOOHH BOYYY!!!

>>54788699
should i believe?

>>54787922
>>54788282
Besides the fact you said the total crypto market cap was "1.638 billion" as opposed to "trillion"? In which case of course you'd still have been wrong because the actual "hard number" was over 3T.

At the actual dominance for #10 at the 9 Nov ATH (your 0.43% figure of course also being wrong, intentionally judging by the rest of your silly virgin posts), which was 1.12% held by USDC at a $34bn market cap, would at current LINK supply give a $66 LINK, not $28. At $100, it would have been #8, which was DOT. LINK was #15.

This is again the actual top of the last cycle. If we use your "being generous kek" 2x multiplier for next cycle's top, #10 would actually be $132 LINK ceteris paribus. In that case, LINK would be $100 even a few spots outside the top 10.

I know you know all this, but what's the purpose of this kind of high school loner silliness? I thought everyone got it out of their system already. Per previous comment, get a hobby. The attention you get from a real hobby will be organic and rewarding, as opposed to the shame of this behaviour unbecoming of a grown man.

>>54787660
You are a MADMAN

>>54790676
>excellerating
Is this a meme or are you as retarded as you claim other people are?

>>54790719
Except the developers of HTTPS didn’t tokenise so that’s irrelevant

>>54792218
>gay numbers
>incorrect data
>talks about taking the virginity of a high school loner? (unsure, didn’t read thoroughly kek)

Weird and creepy!

>>54792218
Based.

>>54792338
Time to log off I think, buddy. Unironically touch grass.

>>54792218
Based dismantler of dogshit

ejwallach is good here if you want a serious attempt at a valuation of Chainlink:
https://twitter.com/ejwallach/status/1644003863152967681

>>54790927
he can spend his whole fortune if he wants, he would never EVER be able to make trannies capable of giving birth

>>54787660
source: dream
Based. 81k 2026

>>54785088
>Altcoins never recover to their previous ATH, everyone who isn't a newfag knows this
Kinda the biggest reason I'm not buying more link or bullish on it.

>>54787530
“Lol”
You clearly don’t understand chain link or economics.
Apple has a 2 trillion MC and has little infrastructure.
The top 100 mining companies in the world combined which produce everything everything is made out of is less than apple MC.
Myth of the market cap.
What don’t you understand about chain link moving 7trillion through its network during a bear market in a nascent industry? If they are the industry standard for trust minimized immutable data transfer and acquisitions between blockchain and traditional data systems and financial systems, they may be moving tens of trillions a year and integrated into thousands of companies products.
There is plenty of inflated money sitting in the system without a home which the governments do not want to enter the CPI. 3 trillion market cap for a top 3 blockchain with institutional investment is not very high.

>>54790719
>>54792328
Boom absolutely slaughtered

>>54787530
link is superior to google
are you retarted?

>>54792218
you gotta remember how weird, creepy, and most importantly broke most people who post here are.
It's pretty obvious that if you can afford to hold 10k link for a few more years, you'll end up with a few million $
All these people who spend all this time fudding Link are just bitter weirdos.
Most people don't have more than a few hundred dollars to their name, so your average fud nigger can't afford 100 link, let alone a 1k sui or 10k make it stack.
Honestly, if I was that broke, I'd probably be bitterposting as well.
These guys have ZERO options.
They have bad debt, live in rental shitholes, and are utterly talentless. No one will ever pay them more than a few dollars an hour because the only thing they offer an employer is their warm body.
It's honestly pretty sad