/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54609387
D E L E T E T H I S . N O W

>>54609387
Yup. I was right

>>54609387
everytime i see one of these charts it dumps again.

First off, we haven't closed the weekly yet. Second, we still have one more year in this channel.

>>54609905
but this time

>>54609387
>>54609400
>>54609795
Wow! very organic, Chainlink labs! You guys are the best shills. It feels real!

>>54609905
Because none of those symmetrical triangles were actually real. You literally drew through wicks and bodies. It was just a simple rectangle till the pat month or two, in which it has morphed into a symmetrical triangle(which in the context of the rectangle means a tightening accumulating range or pivot moment. Volume also declined steadily towards the apex/now.

That said i really dont like diagonal resistance/support lines. Most the time they are worthless. Horizontal is usually all i would put money on. This triangle is just a small hint in the context of the rectangle.

>>54609387
Is that all it can do after 1 year of this range?
There should be a strong short liquidation wick upon reaching $10 and no more sellers left until the previous ATH.

>>54609387
Meaningless lines

>>54609953
drop the paranoia and examine your surroundings honestly

>>54609932
this guy gets it, plenty of time left to accumulate. sergey will dump to keep it in the channel.

>>54610156
>paranoia
He doesn't believe what he's saying anon. He's being dishonest.

August 2020 was the right time to sell link. It bought you 0.04 eth, it now buys you 0.0004 eth. The opportunity cost for anyone in link since mid 2020 is enormous

>>54610293
That should say 0.004 eth. Still, about as bad as it gets for a 3 year hold

>>54610029
>diagonal support and resistance lines
Only brainlets and frauds advocate diagonals

>>54610223
Yep come back next in 2024

Cope half the shitcoins have the exact same chart lmfao

>>54610721
>comparing chainlink fucking governance token for a dex that breaks the moment you fuck with slippage

>>54609953
Hang yourself you fucking faggot

>>54609387
>Price target $18
I think you mean $1000.

>>54609905
It's ok, we can just draw another triangle next month.

>>54609387
LINK rejected off the $8 level again is what's happening.

I don't know what was up with all the seethe and FUD the last few years. I bought 1000 LINK at $7.50 after the big distribution phase, it looks and feels like a solid investment, why is everyone so upset?

>>54612039
I do agree. I picked up 1000 under $5 and now I've got 3000 and up over 100%

>>54609387
I have a need.
A need for sneed.

>>54612039
A lot of newfags (especially /pol/ tourists) bought between $20-$50 believing it would go to at least $100, and got rekt. Nobody ever admits they bought at that range on here but logically someone had to.

>>54612161
Kek so true but for some reason dozens of fudders say they sold at exactly $50 which is quite amazing

>>54610223
>sergey will dump to keep it in the channel.
Whoa, Sergey is the one who keeps dumping Bitcoin?

they changed the graphs that go up to arrows that point at you. smart move, maybe they can have both in the next infographic? buying tokens to get more marketing material to justify buying more tokens. that's the real innovation this project offers, infinite capital generation for fintech startups without any liability

>>54610300
I’m one of the lucky ones who swung during that 2020 pump and then rebought during the big crash.
Went from 2k linkies to 11k with no extra cash put in.
I think I’m one of the few 10k+ holders who didn’t buy around the ICO price.

>>54612275
sn=sn

thread theme song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HImws1znkQ8&list=PLbuPF_tpNEjiov3PN3egaLbSS-3P5-_X3&index=14

>>54611011
by 2140 sure

>>54612275
'muh coin dumped faster and has been crabbing ever since' or 'I try to deflect with the most retarded, unrelated shit imaginable' which one fits this trannyniggerfaggot better bros?

>>54612161
Are we sure it’s /pol/? Every time I see crypto threads there, there’s always a few linkies and not a single fudfaggot.

>>54612039
We literally thought it was going to shoot up to $1,000 and solve all of our problems forever. Most of us are still waging and have watched people holding literal ponzis lap us many times over.

>>54613686
>We
you're a nolinker FUDfag tho :/

>>54613686
ngl, a tg "friend' who admitted to (and showed screenshots) working as a shill for chainlink,some years back, was pressuring us into buying at $50 both ICP and Chainlink, fucking Jerry Smith AIDS nigger faggot con ass retarded nigger piece of shit burn in hell

>>54613755
>a tg "friend' who admitted to (and showed screenshots) working as a shill for chainlink
lol, k

>>54613685
The fudfags post here. /biz/ is usually one of the final destinations on 4chan, once you realize the best thing you can do about the collapse of western civilization is make enough money to remove yourself from it.

For every anon the path is different, but typically they will start on /b/, /a/ or /r9k/, then progress to more niche interests (/fit/, /lit/, /mu/, /v/), eventually end up somewhere they try to discover greater truths (/pol/, /x/) and finally they end up here to try to make something of themselves. Alternatively they stay on /pol/ or /x/ and their brain rots, or they go full doomer and embrace /k/ (note /k/ has plenty of based firearms enthusiasts, its just also swamped with preppers).

>>54612806
Post the real one

>>54613682
You ok bro?

>>54613686
So did /biz/ collectively learn what a market cap was last cycle or what? You guys actually believed chainlink would have a 500,000,000,000 market cap during the last bull run? 1/3 of btcs market cap at the top and MORE than eths? Chain link was going to be the number 2 crypto in 2021?

Well I hope you all learned something. 1000 dollars eoy was a fucking meme you dip.

>>54615401
>1/3 of btcs market cap at the top and MORE than eths?
Yes.
ETH isn't useful in the real world without Chainlink.

>>54610734
Going by the chart UNI must be getting suppressed because big players are accumulating before the gigapump

basedboy

>>54610734
there's no governance associated with the link token my friend.

chainlink is the saphire

>>54615401
Yeah, basically. I mean, personally I didn’t literally think it was going to 1k, but I did think we were gonna get a big pump past $50 that never came. I did not do the math for way too long.

>>54615401
$100 was the real target and it was realistic but bitcoin shit the bed too soon