[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 418 KB, 845x637, 1650632461863117.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54608197 No.54608197 [Reply] [Original]

The Stoch RSI on the 4H is bottomed (00.5 – 0.90), so it looks like a small pump is coming soon. Extremely likely BTC will start pumping soon, but a very quick bear trap to just below 30k is a small possibility - if that happens don't fall into that trap! It's most likely not time yet for the big dump you're waiting for. That's coming later. So I recommend you close your shorts now. If you ignore my advice now then you'll eat shit later.

No, I'm not a bull larping as a bear. I've warned both Mumus and Bobos over and over again; warned about both dumps and pumps, about bulltraps and beartraps.

And inb4 the shills who earlier lied about my calls and take them out of context or misquote them who said the calls were wrong when they weren't; I was in fact correct every time, which if you actually properly read what I posted each time (not just in the OPs) you'd see that's the case (and see who I was actually warning; bears or bulls). Except for my previous call ( https://archived.moe/biz/thread/54522855 ) where I said it would dump very little, but it dumped even less than I predicted, which I admit surprised me, but then again I was actually correct if you consider where that dump began: it began on April 5th and ended April 9th; from 28790 to 27820, a dump of 970 - very close to my "perhaps as little as 1k". So in other words I made that thread too late, should've made it a few days earlier, or said what was remaining of "the current dump" instead of "the coming" one. And anyway I was correct about the "another bulltrap" there; it pumped to 31k. And so far also correct about the 1D Stoch RSI not "not necessarily to above 90 this time" (it touched 90 very briefly; was knocked down; is now sitting around 85), however of course it might very well go to 100 - not that that makes any difference in the longterm. But it going to 100 makes sense now with the 4H bottomed, the 4H rising could take the 1D to 100.

>> No.54608590

>>54608197
How much you estimate the future dump would be for the 1W to bottom ?

>> No.54608851

>>54608197
You vs RSI nigger, who's the bigger faggot?
That being said, I think this pump is at it's end, we are in for a correction

>> No.54609267

>>54608590
See this thread, I'm the OP but I didn't use the trip so I can't prove that: https://archived.moe/biz/thread/54476547
Quote:
>It's of course impossible to make any price predictions (specific numbers) based on the Stoch RSI
>a significant fall in price soon looks certain (which of course doesn't mean it can't test 30k first)
>I estimate however (not based on the Stoch RSI) logical price targets: BTC will dump to at least 25k, and if it drops lower than 25k likely will not go sub 19k and likely stop at 20000-19500. However if it goes below 19k then a retest of 15.5k is probable, and if that support fails then 8k looks like the absolute bottom.
Later in the thread:
>it may pump to 30k
>Sub 8k isn't happening under any situation

That's basically what I still think. Maybe I should rephrase it a bit and slightly modify it, so here goes: BTC will dump to the very least 27k but extremely likely to 26k-25k. If it drops lower than 25k though, then it will likely not go sub 19k; it will likely stop dumping between 19.5k and 21k. However, IF it drops sub 19k then a retest of 15.5k becomes probable. And IF that support at 15.5k fails, then 8k would be the absolute bottom. Not saying that if 15.5k fails that it'll go to 10k even, only that absolute lowest possible bottom would be 8k.

>> No.54609737

So OP wrote this entire muttbrain post based off a single timeframe and a single indicator

>> No.54610492

>>54608197
thanks buying now

>> No.54611009

>>54609267
There is a CME gap at $3.5k. It’s only a matter of time, almost all gaps get filled.

>> No.54611033
File: 150 KB, 366x644, JiJ++kYQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54611033

>>54609737
>So OP wrote this entire muttbrain post based off a single timeframe and a single indicator