/biz/ - Business & Finance

The meme is over. You had 2 years.

LINK is probably the best investment you can make in the 2023rd year of our christ

>>54583052
link might go up eventually but you shouldn't buy it. just think of the massive, gargantuan opportunity cost :}

>>54583052
Use your head.

>>54583052
bro chainlink srs no cap

>>54583052
It's the single most important asset of our generation. It's like if a company owned "data" as a general principle and you had to pay them every time you used any kind of "data".

>>54583068
This is the kind of bullshit I’m talking about, WTF do you mean? It’s at the lowest price in almost 3 years. It’s not like I missed out by not buying this piece of shit. But looking forward is it a good buy or not?

Dude no one is buying the token. You don't make money buying alts from two bull runs ago. You look for the new hot thing and no I am not fudding you. I'm being honest.

>>54583179
uh oh. we got ourselves a stinkie winkie trying to shilly willy his baggie waggies :}

>>54583227
What should I buy instead then?

>>54583227
bro srs chainlink is still the hot new thing with so much stuff about to drop VCs and their new scams cannot compete

>>54583287
Chainlink

>>54583227
So it’s the number 1 oracle but the token has no use?

first one's on the house, the rest you'll have to pay up for (similar to every defi protocol chainlink supports)

>>54583287
Rlc it's about to explode past $10

>>54584098
>date removed

>>54583383

>>54583052
it might moon and land you in make it territory
but the road there is one giant hellscape, you will regret ever learning about link here
others will say i am fudding, but you will learn the pain that is holding link if you try it anon

>>54583052
1-2 years out, I think it's a decent buy
3-5 years, possibly longer, I think it will be one of the top coins by mcap
it's gonna be outperformed in our current cycle by a lot of newer, unpumped coins

If you buy LINK, you die.

You’ve literally had 6 years (and counting)

>>54583052
Holy shit the fud actually works on new fags lol. If you're being serious of whether or not it's a good investment, the short answer is yes. Chainlink is the best investment you can make. I honestly believe it will make all the retards on this board extremely rich. I don't want to spoonfeed you, go to the archives and look for yourself. All the research and constant debates of whether or not Link is a good investment has been talked about for years. All the evidence is out in the open and yet no one notices until Link will hit 1k then people will wonder "Man why didn't i invest in link back in 2018 - 2023 it was so obvious!".
Bitcoin used to cost dollars and understading what crypto currency does is pretty simple yet there are normies who still don't understand bitcoin and it's purpose. So why would you expect normies to understand what an oracle is? Buy Link and wait. Or commit suicide in a few years when you find out you discovered the golden ticket but you threw it away

>>54583052
>asking heroin addicts if doing heroin is good

>>54583052
>is LINK a good investment or not
Yes dipshit. Don’t go all in, but if it’s as important as it appears it could be a big fucking deal in the next 5-10 yrs. Buy at least 100. There are a dozen shitcoins that regularly get pushed here an no one bats an eye. But as soon as the mere mention of LINK on here fudders come out of the woodwork. Something seems off about that.

>>54584688
Checked. Honestly it's kind of sad that new fags don't even notice or find it weird that Chainlink is fudded so hard.

>>54584688
>Buy at least 100
I have 170, and am considering putting some of my BTC into it in order to get to 1k while the ratio is low. Thoughts?

chainlink is the most valuable project in the space but it's unclear how long it will take for the market to realize it
if you do buy it then leave this place as you will be fudded out of your bags

>>54584787
How much link would you be able to get? Also imo link is far better when it comes to reward. Let's say bitcoin gets to 60k and you bought at 20k then you made a 3x and if btc hits 100k then you got a 5x. These are good returns but you won't get wealthy this way. To get a 5x for chainlink, link would have to reach $45 which is extremely possible. Link is needed by every crypto project there is and won't go away any time soon. However buying link this won't have it's risks. Link will go up but we don't know when, if you're a patient man then this shouldn't be a problem. If you want quick and easy return then you're better off holding btc. But then again i'm all in on Link

>>54584897
>How much link would you be able to get?
If I put in all my BTC, roughly 15,000 Link but I see BTC as more of a safety net so I wouldn't want to do that.

>>54584897
However I do see you point, I believe in Chainlink as a project. I might put more in than initially thought.

LINK is one of those things that your grandchildren will ask "Why the fuck didn't you buy more at 7.7 so we could be comfy instead of working at the Village farm. Opportunities like this are rare. Like BTC in 2015.

>>54584931
a 5k stack would be nice but going all in is generally not a good idea when you have more that 5k usd

Let me tell you something. I have over 11000 LINK and one thing I've noticed is that my wallet ranking has steadily been falling over the past 2 months. Retards dismiss this token but whales have been accumulating.

>>54584931
At the very least get a suicide stack. When staking comes out and i mean the real staking not this v.01 shit. Then you would get 3-4 percent back yearly which is 30 - 40 link. Now let's say you believe it'll reach 1k then you're getting 30k to 40k for doing nothing. Do you understand now why people say they'll never sell? Anon staking v1 and ccip haven't been released yet. We're still early, the ogs were just extremely early. Do what you feel is best i just want us all to make it.

>>54583052
The switch has been flipped. 2000+ integrations about to PAY UP. Hurry the fuck up and get in you fucking idiot. You want to make it? Get into LINK now. This is not a drill. This is just the beginning. Whatever moon prices LINK gets now will be NOTHING compared to when CCIP is fully implemented with proper staking and integration with CBDC's. It's fucking happening. GET IN NOW. Time is short. For real dude, I'm being 100% serious here. This is going to be top #3 or higher until the end of civilization pretty soon. The time for explaining is over. I've explained many times here. I'm done explaining. The happening is just beginning. GET IN NOW if you want to MAKE IT.

Fuark I've been buying link every paycheck for a year and only just got 1000 Linkies still a massive stacklet

>>54585437
bro this post is so red pilled my benis is ERECT

>>54585507
1000 is tons, dude, imagine having 1000 ETH

>>54585521
>Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude its a HECKIN segreeeeet investmannnnt
>duuuuuuude we r elite autisth

Daily reminder Linkies are Uncle Rico from Napoleon Dynamite. Cringe central

>>54585558
How are your ANS and NASH holdings going, though?

>>54585558
based fud. bullish

>>54585526
Except the supply of link is 10x higher and the token is not needed

>>54585626
how is ETH even needed or BTC when you can just bribe miners with free electricity from the aether and ETH stakers can just take BNB?

>>54585626
And chainlink will easily have an MC 10x higher than ETH’s current one, so it holds up.

>>54583052

>>54585437
Based

Why isn't there more fud in this thread, it is disconcerting.

>>54585437
HOLY BASED

>>54584249
>>/biz/thread/16249790#p16249794
Evidently you are retarded.

- it's an old dead alt from 2017
- it will never pump more than new alts
- feminine minds consider old alts over new alts because of familiarity
- masculine minds understand why link's hype has forever gone

>>54586352
That is better thanks anon >>54586251

>>54583052
Probably. Nothing is certain.

>>54583052
token needed!!!

>>54586352
This, the truth about Chainlink is that bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

>>54583227
>>54583312
kek based

>>54583075

amen

>>54585437
based af desu

>>54585099
Wouldn’t you expect the APR to drop if the price reaches $1k?

>>54583052
>only have 125 link
it's ogre for me

>>54588798
The APR is paid in Chainlink. The stakers will be given Link no matter the price. The % will remain stable, anon, there's more than enough jobs for the nodes to handle. When basically all data flows through a Chainlink node at some point, and all nodes are paid in Link for their work, then paying out 5% to the stakers is easy.

>>54585437
God's work anon.

>>54585558
Reasons I will never attend the yacht party, in order.
>you might be there
>we are collectively assassinated by a CIA drone strike

Within the next few years link will have a major run and will stabilize in the low triple digit range I think. Why would this all change? Because the token is needed, staking is being rolled out which will set a literal price floor on the value of the token based on yield. As the network has more and more use cases adopted, there is no other choice. I only knew about link due to OG breadcrumb bros, so I will occasionally tell newfag that link is actually legit. The fud acts as a filter, if you're too stupid to realize what is being handed to you on a silver tray, then you're too stupid to make it anyway.

>>54583227
This. Just look at how alts from 17 did in 21. Pretty badly.

>>54589153
Source: dude trust me

With Ethereums godlike tokenomics, people don't have time for LINK which has been primarily used for funding the team, nothing else, historically.

That might change in the future, but Chainlink Labs will have to deliver for that. The upside is astronomical if the deliver, you just have to believe they're able, take the risk and go all in.

There's so much fatigue and negative narrative for LINK after a year of sideways, so it'll take more than hopium to turn the ship. But when it happens, expect +$100

>>54590542
>LINK which has been primarily used for funding the team, nothing else
Every single thing that all of the nodes have done since mainnet launched has required the token.

Your statement is as true as saying "men are women".

>>54590585
And they've been funded by Chainlink warchest and sold on the market for ETH to cover gas costs.

So it's also been used for that, in addition to funding the team. Both have led to massive sell pressure.

>>54590618
>they've been funded by Chainlink warchest
There go the goalposts.

>>54590628
>has been primarily used fo

I said PRIMARILY, there might've been SECONDARY or other usages. Go fuck yourself, you're just derailing

>>54585437
My brother in Christ, will 550 be enough to make it? I am a poor family man.

>>54590640
You then said "nothing else".

>>54583227
>alts
exactly dude don't buy anything but btc do not buy alt coins like eth or link seriously guys it is the current year ok

>>54590747
I concede. Thank you for your contribution.

>>54584098
when was this written?

there's a long-winded perma bull poster that screenshots his own posts and then posts them on here, on twitter, and on telegram
it's pathetic
>zomg chainlink mentioned in another corporate PDF!!!!!

>>54586352
Wrong.
-feminine minds chase after what is shiny and new. Trendy and hot.
-masculine minds gravitate toward the trusty. The sturdy. The old faithfuls. That loyal ol' mutt.