/biz/ - Business & Finance

no you're going to watch your token plummet while you stay locked in your 4% cuck cage, completely helpless to do anything about it.

>>54558699
post hands and nose

>>54558699
No corporation or entity entrusting any significant value (e.g. sensitive data, transactions over a million dollars, etc) is going to trust HTTPS outcalls over Chainlink. You're fucking delusional. ICP will either a) adopt chainlink, or b) fail in the end because it's a security nightmare. You might as well continue securing your data with .pem certs if you're going to use HTTPS outcalls. You fucking tard.

>>54558699
>cuck
Post immediately discarded. You guys outta come up with something new.

>>54558699
>>54558758
I seriously don't get why this keeps getting posted as if the simple contents of the text in that screenshot hold some sort of significance in devaluing chainlink. It's pretty clear that HTTPS Outcalls sacrifice security in order to allow the scalability required for SC's to access a variety of data sources - exactly what Chainlink does. The difference is, the ICP does this at a significant cost to security without providing much (if any) increase in performance.

At best, ICP has a chance - a very slim chance - of being a complementary service to Chainlink where for some reason the DONs are not able to expose certain data or API's that are not exposed by Web 2.0 servers. However, this is a very doubtful scenario as literally everything of value will be accomodated by Chainlink, or alternatively, designed and built to accomodate it as the chosen oracle solution.

Look at it from the perspective of a systems engineering problem. It's fucking obvious.

Not that my rambling matters, as you have clearly demonstrated you don't understand a fucking thing and are just posting the picture like a parrot that thinks its found something shiny.

>>54558688
No, only sergay

>>54558699

>buy some some sort of blockchain powered option contract
>if things go south, I DDOS whatever shitty little server icpiss is querying
>if things go my way I sell for a profit
>???
>infinite profit thanks to the genuineness at icpiss

thanks guys

>>54558838

genuineness=geniuses

No because 15 minute cities

>>54558857
Go spam this on pol

No one here gives a fuck

>>54558857
15 minute cities is not Chainlink fud you dumb nigger

>>54558869
>>54558872
Nah bro 15 minute cities

>>54558699
calling direct htrp endpoints doesn't work with web3 you retard.
lets say i am using this shit tier solution:

on web3 you have an immutable smart contract in which i will input the static url of the api endpoints.

but like 6 months after mainnet, the url endpoint changes or the parameters for the api change format.

THEN WHAT?? you fucking mongoloid

thats why yoy need a consensus mechanism on a decentralized network, where the issue of fetching data is on the oracle, not hardcoded in thz smart contract

Yes. Yes we are.

>>54558758
The team can’t perform to release anything. It’s been such a bad investment it’s unreal

>>54558798
>literally everything of value will be accomodated by Chainlink
except it will. those that are not covered by existing dons will use chainlink functions

>>54559288
checked. how many of these functions have been created?

>>54558699
4.75% but ok.

>>54559258
>The team can’t perform to release anything.
They dominate the space and are widely considered the standard oracle service. They have been in a business relationship with major players in tradfi such as Swift and others for the better part of the last decade. They have released many top-tier products already with more on the way this coming cycle. They are deliving on a massive level and have done a fantastic job. They are the best team in crypto.
>>54559258
>It’s been such a bad investment it’s unreal
It's been a fantastic investment. Many holders are up in multiples of TEN. It did a 350x in 3 years. It is now at the trough of disillusionment and is bearing down on the next run up. In traditional terms this has been a VERY, VERY good investment and anybody with a brain would be accumulating right now. In crypto terms it's been an okay investment. When compared to something like ICP it has been quite simply spectacular.
Get a clue you dolt.

>>54558688
Just like the digimarines

>>54560337
according to your graph link will never go above $25 xD

>>54561305
>never
That is the beginning. It's going far higher it's just going to do it based on real numbers not pure speculation. A much healthier rise past ATH and into the hundreds of dollars.

>>54558688
Yes trillionaires in Ugandian dollars

>$7
lol

>>54559107
To be fair, you'd run an upgradeable contract and/or use proxies.

>>54558688
And just like that the thread has succesfully been derailed.

>>54558699
They only let me stake 7k of my stinkers, how are we supposed to get into this cage you speak of?

>>54558699
Cool post, oracle fees are due on the first

>>54558699
>HTTP calls
Lmfao that's gonna get DDOSed so hard by Ari Juels. Even I could do it

Hello niggers I hold Avax.

>>54561305
According to your post you assume that crypto will stay at current prices forever.

Alts have exactly one (1) bullrun before never reaching previous aths again. Chain link is no different.

>>54558798
it's not about performance. icp containers are a more general solution, an oracle is just another off the shelf component that you can customize. it's like docker containers for web3. you mentioned system design, there is your analogy

>>54558798
yeah but youre shilling CTX which means you are probably a CTX dev, one of the early scammers, or someone with value aligned with LINK being valued. which one are you? or are you one of the Canto fags endlessly dumping on bagholders?

>>54563842
Chainlink cuckolds will claim their altcoin different

>>54564156
Lmao so many Pink Boys discord faggots in here

>>54559483
Its 7% with other rewards from fucking SCALE or whatever the fuck it's called

>>54564239
So it's only an 83% loss (90% loss in underlying plus the 7% "reward")... Not bad at all

>>54558699
checked and fpbp
look at this cucks chimping out
LMAO
M
A
O

>>54564350
Not how percentages work anon

>>54559107
wrong the uri can be stored in contract state and have a setter method exposed to contract owners

>>54563842
Chainlink will not be considered an alt in the future. It’s just as important as btc and eth.

>>54565074
it's just as worthless as dogshit

>>54565197
Great FUD dude.

>>54565234
it actually was good FUD, fag

>>54558688
>go to redeem
>"sorry xir, cuckbase is down for maintenance"
>loss all your coins
>get audited by IRS
>share a cell with Jamal

>>54558699
>Cuck posters are ICP "I can't pump" cucks
LMAO
Can't make this shit up. I knew it was projection

>>54558699
>I
>SEE
>PEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!! XDXDXD

>>54558699
In ter net com pu ter

>>54558699
Pay up

>>54558688
The joke is a namedrop somewhere buried was the thing we hoped for all this time and still they are spinning this as fud that swift isnt posting lazer eyes chainlink memes lol
Fucking swift mentions a retail available token pretty direct in their documents and you arent buying with all the spare liquidity you have
Some many people are gonna go mad over this

>>54565056
yeah so not decentralized, not trustless thx for proving my point

>>54562688
so not trustless, owners keep hand on the contract do you guys even listen to yourselves, youd have to constantly trust that they dont fuck up.

also what happens if the creators of that smartcontract go bankrupt or they get shutdown by the government, who updates the api endpoint? the whole dapp is dead, its not a dapp, its a fucking regular app

>>54568942
listen pajeet I'm not buying xrp ok so cut the malarkey.

>>54565074
15 minute cities

>>54558798
Not every piece of data off chain that's being brought on chain has to go through Chainlink. Link is not needed for the vast majority of data calls ICP is going to be doing through web2 APIs.

I agree if canisters will be used as oracles, and they already are, they will be using Chainlink for verifying prices most likely.

>>54558688
I dumped LINK for QANX, WAGMI

pay
the
fuck
up

>>54569089
15 minute cities have energy restrictions so this is BTC fud in a LINK bread for some reason

>>54569174
Is ICP any closer to the fully decentralised, uncensorable front-ends that we were promised? Last I checked they were asking for KYC.

>>54569198
Layer 1 blockchains will dominate in this bull market most especially ecosystem friendly once