[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 10 KB, 220x326, 4F9337F3-A9AB-430C-87A1-061EB463C86E.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54536907 No.54536907 [Reply] [Original]

Eth maxis are favouring restricting layer 1 and forcing people into layer 2. They’re literally going the exact same path as bitcoiners and crippling their own chain. What will be the new coin that makes eth holders “angry”? Eth is over.

>> No.54536917

It's already here and called Avalanche (ticker: AVAX).

>> No.54536927

>>54536917
shut up roach no one buying your bag

>> No.54536930

>>54536917
>a fucking vax

>> No.54536936

>>54536917
kys brown

>> No.54536948

>>54536917
you will never be european turkroach

>> No.54536951
File: 1.60 MB, 896x1344, 1679509855964773.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54536951

>>54536927
Oh but they will be.

>> No.54536967
File: 935 KB, 1080x2048, Screenshot_2023-04-07-23-36-01-19_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54536967

>>54536917
Based

>> No.54536975

>>54536927
>>54536930
>>54536936
>>54536948
Kys Ethcucks, it's the objective truth. Just look on Twitter to see which L1 is aggressively fudded by the Söylent Banklesscucks the most.

>> No.54536980

Solana and Avalanche already make ETH maxis fume desu, They bully everyone of twitter who even mention their name.

But they don't know that Elrond and Cardano are the true winners

>> No.54536990

>>54536907
>Bitcoin is shit
How dare you call the #1 crypto that?

>> No.54537007

>>54536907
>They’re literally going the exact same path as bitcoiners and crippling their own chain
They're forced to because everything the BTC devs have said about scaling is correct, not that you would even understand what they were trying to say over all of the midwit big blocker propaganda in 2017.
The fact that ETH devs are now buck broken to use a L2 after getting way higher fees than BTC ever did proves this.

>> No.54537012
File: 92 KB, 653x467, bfec.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54537012

>>54536975
Your hyperinflationy surveillance chain with usa connections?

>> No.54537171

>>54537012
That's exactly the kind of low IQ nigger-tier FUD I mentioned, good job finding it.

>> No.54537223
File: 87 KB, 844x1022, 1679625334089530.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54537223

>>54537012
>Emin is an undercover fed! it's all a big conspir-ACK!

>> No.54537780
File: 39 KB, 467x400, 1640810501306.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54537780

>>54537007
>ETH devs are now buck broken to use a L2 after getting way higher fees than BTC ever did

https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee
https://ycharts.com/indicators/ethereum_average_transaction_fee

>> No.54538183
File: 101 KB, 437x395, 0D7EDB19-A017-4B4E-8DCE-1428029475D9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54538183

>>54536907
Hi There

>> No.54538331

>>54538183
80 IQ

>> No.54538557

>>54536907
EGLD?
TEZOS?
Would they make ETH maxis seethe?

>> No.54540026

>>54537007
not really. bitcoin devs were correct that eventually L1 gets saturated enough to necessitate L2, but they were incorrect when they said L1 should be capped at one floppy disk per 10 minutes. L1 shouldn't accumulate 1 gb of data per 10 minutes but it shouldn't be limited to 2-4 mb either. ETH is much closer to the correct number than BTC.

>> No.54540071

>>54537780
>https://ycharts.com/indicators/ethereum_average_transaction_fee
that's for sending from wallet to wallet. something simple. which is not the average kind of transaction on eth, and you know it

>> No.54540098

>>54540026
>bitcoin devs were correct that eventually L1 gets saturated enough to necessitate L2
didnt hal finney and/or satoshi say this in btc early years?

>> No.54540168
File: 404 KB, 1334x293, hal-finney-btc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54540168

>>54540098
hal finney said banks would issue their own currency backed by bitcoin and wouldn't use btc for transactions, it would just be what was backing whatever currency they created, so no, but kind of maybe

>> No.54540188

>>54536907
hi >>54539482

>> No.54540237

>>54540168
I mean, he saw there would be a need for L2s, but didn't know it would be stablecoins and shitcoins and sounds more like he imagined an USDC type situation