/biz/ - Business & Finance

Fudders at panic stations.
WAGMI
1K EOY.

Seems like a good time to market sell my entire Chainlink (ticker: LINK) stack.

>>54457748
Ok, but wen pump, in 5 months it'll be 6 years since I hold LINK. I didn't sell even once, and I'm feeling retarded and tired

I would bet my 15 BTC that swift’s testing did not include chainlink

>>54457748
>SWIFT farts
>*gasps* IT'S ABOUT CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK CHAINLINK
>8
>MOAR
>DAYS
>fudsisters on suicide watch WAGMI

>>54457748
Im thinking we finally made it fellow stinkies

Insider pump soon

>>54458093
You seem unhinged and a bit gay.

>>54457748
>ctrl+F
>0 results

>>54458127
You seem delusional and transexual

>>54458077
They were on stage with Sergey discussing the POC they were doing with interoperability only last year. On that same panel they also discusses CBDC's and how Link is going to be vital going forward to link the many banks together. BNY MELON where there and seemed to agree on each point.
Today Swift make a twitter post saying they have completed testing to do with CBDC and interoperability and that it was a complete success.
These two things have happened and any reasonable person would connect the dots but you want us to believe that you would bet 15 BTC that their testing didn't include Chainlink even though Chainlink are the only project they have actually confirmed on stage that they're doing tests with?

It has become increasingly obvious that you bitter weirdos have ran out of steam and can no longer fud without coming across as entirely out of touch. You have resorted to simply lying. It's sad to see.
It's also quite frustrating. When Adolf Hitler wrote about arguing with jews and how he slowly began to hate them I only had a residual understanding of how he felt but having interacted with you freaks for over a year now I feel like I can confidently say I can empathise fully with him.

Oh well, it won't be long now. What's more frustrating is that you faggots will slink away when Link inevitably moons, or turncoat and pretend you were always sure of its success.
One day I hope to be rich enough to gas you.

>>54458181
>CHAINLINK IS INVOLVED BECAUSE OF MUH SMARTCON YOU DERANGED FUDDERR REEEEEEEE
>THEY DIDN'T ANNOUNCE IT BECAUSE THEY'RE SIMULTANEOUSLY EMPLOYING THE HIDING STRATEGY IT'S PAINFULLY OBVIOUS CONNECT THE DOTS TRUST THE PLAN 8 MORE DAYS

Ignore this jeet

Crumbs to follow: Accenture and Interwork Alliance

>>54458192
>TRUST THE PLAN
i know not a single marine who says this. all marines show you is video evidence. yet the videos have relatively views in comparison to so many others in the space. it's really something to behold

>>54458181
Made me kek

>>54457748
of course they won't just pick a preexisting network
what did you expect

>>54458203
>VIDEO EVIDENCE OF SERGAY SPILLING HIS SPAGHETTI ON STAGE REEEEEEEEEE

>>54458192
>CHAINLINK IS INVOLVED BECAUSE OF MUH SMARTCON
Yes, that's right. The moment where Sergey sat on stage with Jonathan Ehrenfeld from Swift, Stephen Prosperi from DTCC, and Victor O'Laughlen from BNY Mellon and spoke openly about their POC surrounding CBDC Interoperability.
You can find it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWxfeQA3lI4

Are you okay, anon? You seem a bit unhinged. It's almost as if you've been lying and distorting the truth consistently for the last 2 years and it's becoming difficult to navigate the tangled web of bullshit you've made for yourself in the face of the reality of the situation.

>>54458231
>LOOK BRO THEY TALKED ABOUT THE FUTURE AND POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, THAT MEANS IT'S HAPPENING TONIGHT BRO
>JUST LIKE YORKE E RHODES AND TOM GOSNER AND IAN KEANE AND STANI AND ALEX BRO, HOW CAN YOU DISPUTE THE FACT THEY SHOWED UP ON SMARTCON AND THEY TALKED????

>>54457748
Chainlink will be responsible for blockchain integrations and not for CBDC themselves. FAKE NEWS

>>54458231
>bro just look at all these TALKS and PRESENTATIONS, fudders LITERALLY ON SUICIDE WATCH after the latest crumb of SWIFT *POTENTIALLY* adopting chinklink!

>>54458255
Every neutral bystander is of the opinion that I've proven my point to you and you are acting like a deranged retard.

>>54458281
>EVERYONE AGREES WITH ME REEEEEEEE

>>54458281
It's true

>>54458289
You're wrong and that anon is right

>>54458289
You and that other dude have nothing but pointless blabbering in the face of the facts I have presented.
The STRATEGY DIRECTOR for SWIFT sat on stage with Sergey last year and confirmed that not only had they been working together for a long time but that going forward they would be doing POC's that involve moving tokens between banks.

Today Swift have come out and stated that their tests of moving tokens between banks has been a complete success.
This is reality. This is fact. This is what has happened. You cannot dispute this. All you have is inane kvetching. Unhinged greentext. Strawmanning. Pitiable attempts to project your weakness and lack of character upon the person presenting the truth to you.

It's embarrassing. You used to do better than this. Try harder.

>>54458303
>>54458311
>IT'S TRUE T. NEUTRAL BYSTANDER HERE IT'S OBVIOUS LINK IS MOONING ANY DAY NOW REEEEEEEE

>>54458281
Gj anon

>>54458326
ok memeing aside, will you still show up in 8 days when it turns out LINK has nothing to do with this latest announcement so I can mock you relentlessly, or you're going to once again pretend you never said it's happening?

>>54458289
>>54458273
>>54458255
>>54458217
>>54458192
>>54458140
>>54458093

>Hmmm what should I do today...
>Maybe I should spend my free time making hundreds of retarded posts about an asset that I don't even hold and don't plan to hold.

Take your meds schizo

>>54458334
Of course I'll be here. I love this place, despite the anti-Link mongs shitting it up. What happens in 8 days, anon?

>>54457748
Why would they use LINK instead of XRP or can they be both used same time? No fanboys pls. For the record I only hold XRP because it seems like a clear winner coin because it wants to work for the system and the company and team is very stable, and growing, etc.

>>54458346
according to you, SWIFT will reveal LINK's involvement on their CBDC pilot?? that's what you're heavily implying itt
so what happens when it turns out a nothinburger, exactly like the ISO20022 launch?

>>54458350
I don't know a whole lot about XRP but I believe Link and XRP have different roles to play and will probably be used in conjunction. XRP, as I understand it, is kind of like a better, faster, more decentralised, more censorship resistant Bitcoin. It'll be used as a way to efficiently tokenise assets, perhaps. Forgive me if I'm way off, as I said I don't know very much.
Chainlink is the means by which these tokens are connected via different systems, blockchains, banks and other legacy infrastructures. The whole 'tokenisation' effort is pointless without an Oracle to move said tokens between these systems, it cannot work. Chainlink is that Oracle, being far ahead of any of the other so-called Oracles. As I have shown Chainlink is already working with Swift and others to make the concept of exchanging data, info, money or whatever else between different institutions and different blockchains a reality.

>>54458357
>according to you, SWIFT will reveal LINK's involvement on their CBDC pilot??
When did I say that? I didn't even imply it. I have explicitly stated that I believe it's obvious that this announcement is them signaling that the Chainlink POC which they discussed at last year's Smartcon was a success. I don't know anything about their next steps. I understand that they'll discuss it on the 12th, as per the OP image, but I've no idea how much they'll reveal and neither do you.
If they don't come out and specifically namedrop Chainlink that doesn't mean it isn't Chainlink. I tell you what though, if they come out and namedrop Ripple or some other project and don't mention Oracles or Chainlink at all I admit that I'll have been wrong.
I suspect that what will happen is they will continue to use opaque rhetoric which skirts the very edge of what Chainlink deals with, interoperability, and not actually specifically namedrop Chainlink and this will send your lot into rapturous ecstasy wherein you all proclaim Chainlink to be dead and going to 0 and whatever else. When this happens I will simply keep accumulating and remain stoically sure of Link's future as the lynchpin of both tradfi and defi. I will continue with this attitude until I see concrete evidence that I have been mistaken. I have seen nothing of the sort from the fudders who seem to become less and less connected with reality with each passing week.

>>54458448
>it doesn't matter if they don't explicitly point to chainlink, they're using it until proven otherwise
>I won't be convinced I'm wrong until someone screams to my face that LINK is not used
oh, a schizo
good talk man, see you in a couple of years

>>54458350
Jesus fuck the iq of xrp holders...
Every single one is a retard. My most retarded friends all hold XRP and speak just like this poster

>>54458468
This deflection is what I have come to expect from your lot but in my naïve sense of honour I continually make the mistake of granting you the chance to act with respect and argue in good faith. You always disappoint me. Oh well. See you in a couple of years, anon.

>>54458350
>>54457748
their cbdc interop solution uses neither link nor xrp
I have no interest in either, just stating facts that are easily verifiable when downloading the docs from swift.com

>>54458520
>I have seen nothing of the sort from the fudders who seem to become less and less connected with reality with each passing week
>you're deflecting
kek, the irony is palpable
staking 0.1, failure to deliver on their roadmap of CCIP and enterprise abstraction layer, Sergey admitting they don't have a plan moving forward and community advocates begging people to stop being negative and start making memes are surely not a reason to be concerned after 6 years
the absolute state of deranged midwits

>>54458479
Midwits can't grasp the concept of an oracle, let alone the idea of DONs. Everything that matters is already using Chainlink and they are too stupid to even be aware of it. They are the equivalent of every normie out there who types "www.facebook.com" into the URL bar without knowing what DNS is. They don't need to know. They type the name, a DNS server resolves it to an IP address, and they're happy as larry in blissful ignorance as to how any of it works.

Just like any midwit, they've learned to use the basics. They have a wallet, they know how to exchange tokens and connect between different chains and utilize simple mechanisms like staking. But they don't fucking understand what is going on behind the scenes. So naturally you end up with retards asking shit like this >>54458350 and, apparently without irony, they can't grasp the depths of their own fucking retardation.

It's an astonishing thing to witness.

>>54458549
no anon you don't understand, this is by design, they're forced to use "opaque rhetoric" instead of spelling out Chainlink's involvement for ((reasons))
just ignore project Cedar and all the rest of the pilots goy

>>54458552
>Sergey admitting they don't have a plan moving forward and community advocates begging people to stop being negative and start making memes are surely not a reason to be concerned after 6 years
Source?

>>54458573
https://open.spotify.com/episode/13O2EbxedAwDqiScOvO9ZP?si=6ihlYxxQSc68mBEQkDSzGg&app_destination=copy-link&nd=1

>I can’t predict what is going to happen next, so I just want to make sure we offer a lot of services so we can hopefully be used by whatever is popular
>mentions that hot use cases have been DeFi and NFTs, both of which were just complex ways of hyping up idiots to invest money in bull shit so that it could be siphoned by small groups.
>he can’t even feign excitement about his pie in the sky parametric insurance ideas and basically just says “well insurance is real slow moving…so…”

Then when it came to the token, this is a summary of what was said (starting at 57 minutes in)
>If you wanna understand the token, you have to understand cryptoeconomic security…which isn’t really well understood
>Sergey babbles on without explaining how cryptoeconomic security ties into the token
>the interviewer realizes sergey hasn’t explained why the token is valuable and in an effort to salvage that segment talks about the cryptoeconomic security of the Bitcoin network and ethereum. Again though: no one specifically explains the Chainlink cryptoeconomic security model.

>>54458583
feel free to try and debooonk this

https://twitter.com/Crypto___Oracle/status/1636530531562315777

community advocates telling holders to either shut up and start making positive memes or sell and fuck off

https://twitter.com/ChainLinkGod/status/1636780688753164289

>s-s-stahp the fud pls

>>54458583
Since you didn't timestamp the first point I'm not going to listen to an hour and a half podcast to find it. For the second point he answers generally at first by referring to the white paper and other networks, then he goes on to answer specifically why chainlink and oracle networks in general need a token and why it is valuable.

>>54458625
then quote his exact words on the second segment bro

>>54458625
also
>I'm a linkie but I'm just not gonna listen to the podcast of the CEO of chainlink is all AHAHAHAHAHH

>19 pbtid

>>54458648
>IWA from 2020 is the crumb to follow goy

>>54458560
Nailed it

Thats the definition of a crumb , jeet

>20 pbtid

>>54458630
>when you talk about other systems like bitcoin and etherium and others they don't fully see the economic and game theory dynamics at play to allow the system to operate properly. There are a number of points that I made in presentations with diagrams of this topic, and there are a number of points in our white paper, and that's where people should be reading to understand this.
>It's pretty clear that the incentives that our system has created by paying LINK to chainlink node operators has allowed it to resist adversaries and allowed it to resist massive congestions on various chains, where other systems were not able to continue operating.

>>54458666
an "invalidated crumb" jeet
>>54458676
that is completely valid and in no way does it demonstrate in a precise way how chainlink tokenomics enhance the cryptoeconomic security
are you baiting me right now?
even long term die hard linkies can admit shit's fucked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0NXdZAOCF4

>>54458583
That anon asked you to provide a source for your statement:
>Sergey admitting they don't have a plan moving forward
and you provided quotes from a source in which Sergey states:
>I can’t predict what is going to happen next, so I just want to make sure we offer a lot of services so we can hopefully be used by whatever is popular

I'm not sure this needs saying but those two statements are not the same. You cannot find a source for Sergey stating that they don't have a plan moving forward, can you anon? You're just a liar, anon, aren't you? You come here EVERYDAY and spend up to 12 hours fudding a project you profess to have no real interest in. I'll never get over how sad that is.

>>54458685
>that is completely valid and in no way does it demonstrate in a precise way how chainlink tokenomics enhance the cryptoeconomic security
>are you baiting me right now?
Ok, you're not even trying to have a debate at all. You're either mentally ill, mentally retarded, or just hard mad on LINK for some reason. 21 posts by someone who is apparently just trying to warn others away from a obscure crypto project on a South East Asian carp farming forum.

Stop giving this jeet (you)s, thats how earns his rupees

wagmi

>>54458687
>>54458700
read between the lines and this is the conclusion you'd reach, unless you expected him to publicly admit they're screwed, but you can't even admit that his entire tone has dramatically shifted from all his previous appearances
>opaque rhetoric!
>both shills proceed to have a mental breakdown lashing out in anger
>>54458703
the audacity of you calling me a jeet when all you contributed to this thread is a dead crumb from 2020
fuck you paid shill and fuck you all deranged psychos

>>54458711
Do you own any chainlink?

No matter how many threads you spam

WE WILL NEVER SELL

We are ALL in this together... Remember the memes Anons? i remember. I hope that when LINK pumps we can all come together and shit post just one last time...

>>54458711
You're trying to apply your personal flavour of armchair psychology to the CEO of Chainlink, and somehow stretch it to fit your narrative about a company and a technology that is far greater than any one man.

Tell me, where do Dr. Ari Jules and Steve Ellis fit into your perception of big picture thinking? Fucking idiot.

>>54457748
Also everyday I truly whether the schizo larper was right. We’ll see until the end of the month.

why link to a twitter account that doesn't exist?

>>54458800
Guys i just found something interesting... binance is delisting link futures on april 6th

>>54458846
https://cryptonews.net/news/market/20734348/
This

>>54458846
>>54458855
I saw this news and I have to ask: have they done this with any other tokens/coins?

>>54458855
Big price movment coming after 6th april

>>54458827
Wait a minute.
>Nick Kerigan
>Nick Ker, again
Is SWIFT having a little laff?

>>54458861
Only with shitcoins in a bearmarket, dead coins basically

>>54457748
I DONT WANT YOUR JEWISH SHITCOINS SWIFT

People have literally spent 5+ years fudding a token they don't even hold... why?

>>54457748
Uh fudders bros, whats our response?

>>54458888
checked

https://files.catbox.moe/9julz3.webm

>>54458328
Oh look it’s this faggot again. You also were the 50pbtid fag in the other thread. Lmao at your life, what a sad existence

>>54458846
Insider pump starts then probably

>>54458846
Sauce?

>>54458915
>all dislike and critique of LINK is paid shill fud to make LINK fail because it's a threat
Right? That's what you baggies believe. Same as with the GME fags. You're no different at this point. Your mind is disconnected from reality. If LINK really was a threat then Sergay would be dead long ago.

>>54458973
I never said it was paid. I am just wondering why people have been fudding tokens they have no financial stake in everyday for free.

>>54458973
Not a single linkie thinks that, its being fudded do we would sell our linkies

And thats why DR;NS makes you seethe so much

>>54458711
damn this jeet got hella PISSED

CZ WILL PAY
BULGARIANS WILL PAY
DISCORD TROONS WILL PAY
JANNIES WILL PAY
MEV PINCOCKS WILL PAY
ED (SNAKE) FELTON WILL PAY
APU 3 GREEDY ASSHOLES WILL PAY

>meanwhile in reality
New lows soon link cucks

Bonjour
Inb4 cuck, incel, cult, -9x vs eth, hr roasties, chainlink labs ambassadors and so on

>>54458181
So why didn't Swift mention chainlink being part of their success? You guys are seeing shit that isn't there. That's why the price of Link hasn't moved.

Btw, I can't wait til they release this cbdc and crash the dollar so I can buy up worthless dollars to pay off my mortgage.

>>54459417
holy ID, Kek me harder

>>54458800
>just a few more years
lol

>>54459417
Chill Ari dont show your power levels yet

>>54459053
>its being fudded do we would sell our linkies
this is an English speaking website, Sandeep

>>54457748
>interoperability
>chainlink be warned
Where are Biz leaders here? How come LINK is fronting interoperability features they got from Allianceblock partnership? Does everyone here fake deaf ears to the attention seeking thread LINKies here.
Don't want to see hokinson revolution here, only interested in the next era of DeFi.

>>54458750
He owns link, and fuds it endlessly. Most of it just incoherent conjectures. Here he was yesterday. You can tell by his writing style and the fact that he always brings up TradeLens kek.
>>54452000
>47 pbtid

>>54459417
>MEV PINCOCKS WILL PAY
isn't LINK in debt to them as the crypto community will learn why token is needed due to FSS specifically because of MEV

>>54458625
Pretty weak comeback. You guys made a big thing about him not providing evidence, which he then immediately posted.

>>54458774
>y y you dont know sergey, only I do
Arent you doing the same thing?

Link will NEVER pump

Your bags will NEVER make you rich

You will NEVER have sex

Cuckolds will keep losing forever while their shitcoin keeps underperforming the market

>>54459468
Bump. Can somebody answer this geniunely? I get it that they did the POC and theres obviously a connection with Swift. Thats undeniable. But what I dont get is why Link is never mentioned in any of these announcements. It feels like Arbitrum. Yes I own Link but have lost hope

>>54459967
>. But what I dont get is why Link is never mentioned in any of these announcements.
HELLOOOOOO? You bought a 2017 shitcoin and you're suffering from Rippletard delusions.

Every single XRP schizophrenic believes banks will pump their shitcoin bags, Linkies are exactly the same.

>>54459967
Link is backend infrastructure. No one needs to know it's used. That's like them talking about how TCP/IP facilitated their emails which lead to success in remote communications.

>>54457748
>Register now: LINKedin.com
holy shit is this real?

>>54458061
Hey at least we have each other
>t. $2 million down to $300k, could have retired instead living in my own personal wagie hell

>>54458273
When SmartCon 2022 started I was there, sitting in the audience. Still a bit hangover from the night before, because I came to NYC the day before and was terribly jetlagged so drink myself to sleep. Anyway, when they started banging on those buckets I literally felt katharsis. At this moment I know I was literally fucked in the ass by Sergey and there's nothing I could do about it. Pretty incredible feeling. The fact that I paid fucking $777 for the ticket to watch those hobos breakdancing was a cherry on top

>>54458711
>22 pbtid

THIS IS IT LINK MARINES $1000k EOY

>>54460091
KEK this literal cuckold gave up financial freedom for muh 1k meme
At least you can still afford a double wide in a flyover!

>>54458800
>insider for the banks since the start and the name of his token implied his real goal since the start.
>4 years of foreshadowing of his hidden connections through the token name itself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ueUSd7Mb4Y

That's actually the problem that chainlink solves, it's called chainlink for a reason.

>>54460324
>token
simply not needed
>Sergey
sleazy midwit scammer
>Link bagholders
schizophrenics with battered wife syndrome

You will NEVER accept reality, you will keep spamming your shitty CLL videos thinking you're outsmarting the market will you're doing the opposite. You're in a cult

>>54459967
Do you think they're obligated to shout from the rooftops that CHAINLINK IS THE NEW STANDARD FOR LITERALLY EVERY TRANSACTION?
Do you think they even want people to know this? They don't want you to hold Chainlink you fucking peasant. They tolerate people like us, that's it, nothing more.
Another thing - do you see them mentioning any other tokens? XRP? EVEREST? No of course not, but you don't see people making a song and dance over that declaring XRP a failed project. Nobody cares about XRP except for XRP holders. They get left alone for the most part. Chainlink gets fudded as if people's lives depend upon it. There are ALWAYS several threads devoted entirely to fudding Link in the catalogue. It is difficult to find a single Chainlink tweet that doesn't have at least one bitter, disparaging reply.
Chainlink is the protagonist of Crypto, and everybody knows it. That is why it is so controversial.
I don't even know why I bother fighting the fud, not just because it is flimsy and falls down by its self in front of anybody with a brain and a willingness to research, but because I don't care if other people hold Chainlink. I hold Chainlink and that's enough. I guess I just can't stand dishonesty and it's all I see nowadays. A few bitter cunts who bought the top and now spread lies all day for no pay and no benefit. I enjoy this board and it saddens me to see it be reduced to the stomping ground of a herd of myopic, deplorable, doomposting midwits.

>>54459944
>>54459982
>>54460346
Wew, that is some wishful thinking on your part. What an odd obsession. You have multiple images saved specifically to engage these "cultists" you speak of, you hope/wish they are never going to be successful, you seem seriously emotionally invested in this project except as a naysayer instead of a cheerleader... which is even more pathetic if you ask me.
>Stop liking things I don't like REEEEEEE

SWIFT officially BANNED from Twitter by Based Elon.

>>54458093
>>54458140
>>54458192
>>54458217
>>54458255
>>54458273
>>54458289
>>54458328
>>54458334
>>54458357
>>54458468
>>54458552
>>54458562
>>54458583
>>54458590
>>54458597
>>54458620
>>54458630
>>54458641
>>54458654
>>54458685
>>54458711
My dearest friend, 'tis with immense pleasure that I inform you that your letter has found safe travel to my destination and landed in my hands. However, this pleasure was fated to remain short lived and bittersweet, for I must also admit to you, regardless of what distress it may cause to you, knowing you went to great trouble to pen it and deliver it to me, that I in fact declined to open it and refused to read the message contained within. Surmising your intentions, there exists no doubt in my heart regarding your sincere worries for my financial well being, but alas your attempts to convince me to modify my investment strategies shall regretfully remain futile, as my stubbornness in this matter has indeed been sealed irrevocably and no other voice shall rock its imperturbable foundations. Allow me then to reiterate my will once more, and do your best to forever remember it for no change will follow: I shan't part ways with my beloved asset for it is my utmost belief that I have invested wisely and foresee infinite potential in its future, and therefore no other possession in this world shall change my decision, not even a mountain of gold! For my possessed asset is indeed fated to be worth more than any other riches in the world. We shan't speak of this no more. Sincerely yours, your beloved friend.

>>54461508
Based. I shall never sell my investment as well. Just bought 10 more

>>54461508
LMAO
Comedic genius

https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/rapporter/e-krona/2023/e-krona-pilot-phase-3.pdf

Riksbank is the Central Bank of Sweden
>ctrl f 'oracle'
>5 results
It essentially describes Chainlink. Ofc perhaps they're using Band lol

>>54460597
well said anon

>>54458032
Doesn't it being in a certain number of indexes mean it's going to be tradable in either mainland China or HK?

i wouldn't be surprised if those announcements were 3 years old

>>54458181
Based

>>54458855
What the fuck, it’s literally going to happen isn’t it

It's happening. Tonight. Tonight.

>>54460049
*I think what you meant to say is that Link is a token associated with backend technology built by the team at Chainlink labs. These are two different things. I am only interested in the former going up in price.

I understand the technology is similar to TCPIP. I've done a little reading on it and it's not clear to me who profited off inventing it? It looks like it was some academics that came up with it, and then it was implemented by big tech, but my question is did the academics and their investors get rich off of it? Do you see what I'm getting at here? My concern is that Swift is saying ok cool that's a great idea, and then they just build their own. Also kind of similar with Bill Gates and Windows.
>>54460120
I was watching live remotely and had a similar experience. I actually started joker laughing at the absurdity of it. Like they weren't even hiding it anymore. I couldn't even be mad

>>54460182
easy to laugh now but if it went the other way he would've been a genius for holding. $2M changes your life big time for sure but certainly not enough to escape waging if you're in the US and want to have nice things and/or a family

>>54460597
The whole conspiracy to keep it quiet thing is where I get lost. I'm just a regular guy who is not a threat to the current system, nor would I be if I had a few million bucks. Do people here really think they're going to be fighting George Soros with like $5-10M? I also don't believe Biz collectively has a ton of money, so the thought of someone sending paid people to deter autists from buying an altcoin seems absurd. I think the majority of fud is either people who missed sub 50 cents and the people who held down from the top and are frustrated.

Almost 10% of the US population in the US are millionaires. 200 dudes from a frog forum making some money literally changes nothing.

>>54464250
They say a slave talks of bravery like a fish talks about riding a bicycle. .

>>54464250
>Biz collectively has a ton of money, so the thought of someone sending paid people to deter autists from buying an altcoin seems absurd
sam spend fortunes astroturfing biz before he imploded
it was obvious as fuck in early 2022, only problem was that was max newfag inflow and oldfag withdrawal so it didnt get shit on as much as it should

>>54464250
>The whole conspiracy to keep it quiet thing is where I get lost.
This notion arises from two sources:
1. the Nexo FUD campaign via their sock puppet VC Zeus Capital (unequivocably proves there was paid FUD against LINK)
2. the Hiding Strategy that Eric Schmidt (Chainlink advisor) used in the early days of Google. Google had cracked the code on monetizing the internet at scale and they kept this hush hush until they had sufficiently cornered the market. Given Chainlink's similar role in Web3 to Google's in Web2, and the Eric Schmidt advidory role, it stands to reason that they're playing from Schmidt's playbook here to some extent, even if it isn't intentional.

>>54460639
okay cuckold

>$7.3
lol lmao even...maybe link will pump in two more weeks!

>>54457748
Bullish for XRP

>>54464250
There are people from /biz/ who have managed to accrue over 100k Link. Not many, but they exist. Even still many OG's managed to accrue tens of thousands of Link. We're not talking about a few million dollars here we're talking about a group of racists from the world's foremost wrong-think website holding a collective shitload of the token that will be the primary method of controlling all data in the not too distant future. This is a threat. I also never said that anybody was 'hiding' anything. They're not hiding anymore, not really. Swift sat on stage at the biggest Chainlink event ever and made it very clear that they intended to work with them going forward. This isn't hiding. What they're not doing is jumping up and down with a big sign that says 'BUY CHAINLINK'. They're under no obligation to do that and so won't do that. The signs that the two camps are working together aren't exactly difficult to spot, though. Even if you disregard the Strategy Director for Swift explicitly stating this to be the case there are and have always been dozens, if not hundreds, of other clues in the past. Enough breadcrumbs to feed a very long row of ducks. They don't want you involved but at the same time they probably feel that they need to at least appear as though everybody had the chance to be a part of this new generation of finance and so Chainlink, being purchasable by just about anybody, allows them to claim that this is the case, but they hardly need worry. How many people actually hold Chainlink? Not a lot. It might be in the top 25 but its reach into crypto twitter is actually fairly small and when it comes to the normiesphere beyond crypto it's quite literally unheard of.
You're right about the majority of the fud being people who bought the top. There have certainly been cases of paid fud, Nexo being the main culprit, but as of right now there is only a handful of very tragic people who do it for free. They do it all day, too. For free. It's bizarre.

>>54465074
>cuckold manifesto
Ironic since even OGs who bought their 100 stacks still haven't made it after 6 years.

But yeah I'm sure it's because the Bulgarian trannies are suppressing the price

sergnigger mcnastyslob here
what does this have to do with chainlink?
>eats 19k calories
>farts in your thread
>leaves

>>54465120
>5 mil usd isnt making it
i didnt know neets from monaco posted here, because that is make it money anywhere else

>>54465120
Why are you people so enamored with cuckoldry?

>>54465229
good question, maybe a chaincuck can answer that for you but they seem to just get mad when you bring it up

>>54465247
What the fuck are you talking about? Speak like a normal human being, you brain-addled twat. Forget that you're a permanently online dimwitted mongoloid for a moment and try to answer me without reverting to your programming and your imaginary war against the 'chaincucks'. Pathetic specimen. Grow up.

>they seem to just get mad when you bring it up
>assblasted cuckold >>54465375 chimps out

>>54458687
>I'll never get over how sad that is.

Its not sad. Its legit evil. They know what they are doing and greed or money is motivating it. Whether they are paid or just want to continue accumulating in this current channel.

This is another chance to buy something that has a better value proposition than BTC. Even Citibank came to that conclusion. Retail investors are purposely being push away with any means necessary.

>>54458181
based except for
>it won't be long now
you know this shit is going to take another 5 years

>>54465660
I honestly don't think that's the case. I think they're stupid. I think they're very stupid people who have bought the top and have literally nothing in their lives that sparks joy or hope and so they have developed a complex surrounding the one thing that they felt could have provided a way out but actually made things worse. The real paid fudders gave up a long time ago when either the funding ran out or it became obvious that we weren't going to capitulate. What is left is a group of tragically lonely and low IQ individuals who have formed a group together to fud Link as they are incredibly bitter and want everyone else to feel as they do.
If you interact with them for a while this is the only conclusion you can come to. Why else would they make posts such as this: >>54459944
They're fucking losers.

>One day I hope to be rich enough to gas you.
t.impotent incel KEKOLD LMFAO

>>54465901
>incel cuck manifesto

LOL
O
L

>>54465942
>>54465916
>>54465492
>>54465247
sub 80iq retard impotently seething because he bought at the top lmao
day in, day out with the impotent seethe
you and your 'friends' are absolute bottomfeeders and should neck asap
You will forever be poor.

>nothingburger
its over

>>54466092
This is the same guy, lmao.
>>54465537

>>54465133
Faggies will never have a real utility for chainlink. Harmony One and Allianceblock are the proponents of interoperability on blockchain. Chainlink is an imitator

>This is the same guy, lmao.

Don't forget lads, Quants business model relies on banks staying with their legacy systems, if they move to block chain, LINK will insta BTFO them

>>54465375
Kek linkies truly are mentally ill

Why would countries want to use a system that the US can sanction them if they piss them off ?
Countries are turning away from swift, keep up people.

>>54458181
>when it inevitably moons

It already mooned from cents to $50, sorry you missed out or bagheld like a moron

>>54467434
Also this, you guys not see everyone slowly dumping their US treasury bags and de dollarizing after the US stole a trillion dollars of US treasuries that Russia held? Why the fuck would they want to use SWIFT?

lmao

>>54461508
>me against the world
Fucking kek

>>54458093
>>54458140
>>54458192
>>54458217
>>54458255
>>54458273
>>54458289
>>54458328
>>54458334
>>54458357
>>54458468
>>54458552
>>54458562
>>54458583
>>54458590
>>54458597
>>54458620
>>54458630
>>54458641
>>54458654
>>54458685
>>54458711
>>54465133
>>54465247
>>54465492
>>54465916
>>54465942
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

>>54468162
I love this pasta. Fudcucks btfod every single time.
>>54467582
Youre so desperate. Hundreds of hours of your life wasted fudding link with 0 results. Even a videogame addict would at least learn to be good at a game even if he wasnt doimg anything with his life lmao.

>>54465901
>I think they're stupid. I think they're very stupid people who have bought the top and have literally nothing in their lives that sparks joy or hope and so they have developed a complex surrounding the one thing that they felt could have provided a way out but actually made things worse.

Everyone always goes the route of "Hanlon's Razor" and suggests to never attribute malice to something where incompetence adequately explains it but I think that is a convenient cover and evil intention is more common than people would like to accept.

Stupidity is more comforting rather than the idea of organized and systemic malevolence which can be too frightening for the masses. I'm not saying that last sentence applies to you.

>The real paid fudders gave up a long time ago when either the funding ran out or it became obvious that we weren't going to capitulate.

Their purpose isn't to get people to sell as much as it is to gatekeep from new people accumulating or buying.

Posts like the one you tagged is a poor attempt at profiling the average 4Chan member and trying to correlate the symbolism of cuckolding with Chainlink. For whatever reason, the shills seem to think trying to demean us sexually will actually elicit an emotional response and drive the average person that makes their way to the boards away from either becoming a new buyer or create a moment of weakness where they can get holders to sell.

Idk why they think that works as the boards are over run with INTx profiles and those groups are notorious for abandoning emotion specifically in regards to decision making.

We all generally understand the long term potential of Chainlink and they need people to abandon their long term reasoning for short term emotional mistakes.

They don't even care if you sell and buy back. People might not understand how much of retail gets rekt in the market chop succumbing to bad choices on a whim by buying local tops while selling local bottoms.

>>54468329
> For whatever reason, the shills seem to think trying to demean us sexually will actually elicit an emotional response

Link fudders are trans and that's the only thing they can think of to try to hurt someone because it is the seat of so much anguish in themselves

>>54468246
Ok buddy I'm sure everyone will keep using swift despite mass abandonment of the dollar and treasuries

>>54468329
They also hold XCM a token infamous for not being able to be sold
Which is the most glaring case of forced cuckolding of all time

cope, the token is not needed

>>54468432
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

>>54465660
By “Citibank”, you mean the person who wrote that 3 years ago. Has Citi ever mentioned Link price again? Have they ever said anything remotely close to that article since? The landscape of now versus then is drastically different. Most of crypto has turned out to be scams and Chainlink has partnered with most of them, destroying its credibility. Also they delivered nothing since ‘21 but empty buzzwords and stupid ass infographics.

>>54465887
Or maybe another ten years, or maybe 15. TCPIP ideas started in the 70s, mainstream implementation in the 90s. Serg wont last that long if thats the path. Pathetic fucking cuck scamming weakling will have passed with a heart attack at that point. Living a dishonest life takes years off your life, not to mention spending almost all of your adult prime extremely overweight.

>>54469054
>>54469028
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

>>54469114
These posts demoralize fud cucks
Imagine wasting thousands of hours of your life fudding to get 0 results and have your behavior reduced to a pasta which you cant really argue against without proving its point

But then again theyre probably fudding because their lives depend on it - more than a few of these people will probably end up in some rich psychos basement in roblox having their teeth pulled out with pliers post singularity

Every fud post made by metally ill porn addicts contains:
>cuck
>incel
>cult
Spamming same boring shit everyday

>>54469028

They didn't mention price at all. They simply said the potential value of the Chainlink decentralized oracle network is probably going to be worth more than BTC in the future. The use case captures value better.

Sure most crypto is a scam but ANY project can use Chainlink's tools without their permission. That is the point. If a protocol needs price feeds or verifiable randomness for example that is who you use as they are the standard. Some will fail and some won't. Some will be scams and some won't. Their tools are neutral and they don't discriminate.

Its like blaming Goodyear because a getaway driver used their tires after a bank heist.

>>54458855
Holy fuck were actually all gonna wagmi arent we? I was ready to wait for another year but looks like the secret is out with swift.

>>54458861
If it doesn't get much interest yeah

>>54469707
>>54469698
>>54458885
>>54458855
>>54458846
>binance is delisting link futures on april 6th

That is inaccurate. The article says they are delisting the binary leverage LINKUP or LINKDOWN tokens.

>>54458855
>https://cryptonews.net/news/market/20734348/

No one uses those because the regular perpetual futures are superior and will remain. Pic rel

How do you cold store link it doesn't seem to be supported on Trezor and I'm a relatively nufag

>>54469918
LINK is an ERC-20 token. Use your ETH address.

https://twitter.com/Hyperledger/status/1642975448488353792
OH NO NO NO QUANTBROS NOT LIKE THIS

>>54469930
Interesting. Thank you anon

>>54469951
>"no they are no longer members. But they are out in the parking lot right now under some sort of portable tent"
Lmfao

>>54469227
>reads the same boring shit everyday
>cries about it everyday
you're in a low iq cult lead by an obese dysgenic slav freak, chaincuck incel
LOL

>>54470152
Post hand

Hello I am looking for the counter culture revolutionaries who mine BTC and pay their electricity and internet bills to end the FED and stop bank bail outs

>>54458800
Good memories.
Time sure flies by fast.
We will finally find out.

>>54457748
Fuck you. I already use a web3 payment processor with out any fee for cross border transactions.
>fucking fiat or CBDCs all the same
Crypto gives me financial freedom and I'm content with that jeet.

>>54469918
>How do you cold store link
I'd rather cold store a picture of me stroking my wet leather than sergey's flaccid red dildo. You brainlets keep amazing me kek.
Fucking sell your bag already, you should have done so a long time ago and researched to find gems yourself. Altcoinistdao tool should help put you oldfag back on green dildos

>>54461508
fucking based and legendary

>>54471317
Again with the weird sexual fetish shit, fudcuck.
>please please PLEASE sell
Lmao you should just neck yourself

>>54471100
Kek..that's smart. It's the future. I recently bought my self a ear pods with shopify using USDT and it was a no brainer. Paying with crypto is fun I even got cash backs.
Fiat is now actually a pain in the ass.

>>54470612
Mining with Riggs are old. I am waiting for the PoR consensus to go live where I can mine with a mobile phone or with a raspberry pi which is cheap and eco-friendly.

>>54459422
I wish.

>>54459967
The financial world has to go fully digital before things start really moving and at the moment they're wringing every last drop of value from the old system that they can.

This is the last chance to buy single figure link. In the next couple of weeks the price will jump to $12 before retesting $10 then it will run up and never come back to these levels again. Last ticket to avoid having to eat ze bugs.

>>54472567
Trinity consensus with EEE NNNNN QQQ (First letter of each, this token is censored on this board for some reason for years now) allows for mobile mining.

The sheer intensity of the fudding ITT makes me so bullish. They're afraid.

Congratulations, you have made it.
We have put a timer on your money so you make sure to participate in the economy. $1,000,000 will be burned every year unless you spend over $1,000,000 on whatever we do not deem inappropriate. Also, $1,000 have been burned for every post you made on the alt-right extremist imageboard.

>the schizophrenic Link cuckold keeps spamming his collage to defend his rank 27 shitcoin while Sergey dumps on him

>>54469797
This is neither bullish nor bearish, it is both. People are short in cold markets and leverage long in bull market. Almost all of the bull market steam is literally imaginary long leverage money, ending in the ultimate game of hot potato. Crypto as a financial instrument is purely adversarial and no one wants you to make it, you think the guys who shot Bitcoin with $80m give a fuck if retards make good on their investment? They'd throw you and your family down a well to watch their number go up, they have nothing else in life.

If your goal isn't to get enough money to be free from money, then you'll be just like them, looking at memecharts and shit posting on Twitter as a miserable millionaire who is owned by greed, envy and the need to feel visible to those below them. At best you'll be miserable, at worst you will be stabbed to death or kidnapped and have your teeth pulled out and balls burned with hot spoons until you give up your keys.

>>54457748
Ctrl + f "Chainlink"
Zero results

>>54476649
Which solution do you think they will use for interoperability? It doesn't mention any names.
Genuine question.

>>54472278
Can you elaborate? Which card/system were you using?

>>54476711
overledger

>>54476779
kek ok