/biz/ - Business & Finance

Great thread. Yes. Sort of. But I think it's all women. My wife. Several months after seeing the movie, out of nowhere, The Martian is a dramatized version of real life events...No honey. We never grew plants on Mars, man has not stepped foot on that planet. It was surreal to say the least. It kinda of makes sense, if you think the moon landing is real it is absurd to think we didn't go to Mars yet.

>>54416770
Yeah she sounds retarded

On a side note:
Does anyone know why polygon is so slow? This shit is worse than ETH?

>>54416770
why did you shit up my board for relationship shit?

It sounds like you have a pretty wife, stop bragging

>>54416770
She's dumb as a rock.

>>54416770
>are women retarded?
no way sherlock

>>54416770
Once I was reading an article and there was a picture of India or something in it. It was very clearly india in the photo. My girlfriend at the time saw the photo and said something like “where is that??” I said “what do you mean?” And she as like “is that Russia or something??”

I got “the ick” right then and there. I could never see her the same again after that, and broke up with her shortly after. Some women are just fucking retarded unfortunately. You have to find a balance between educated but not too educated where she thinks she’s superior. Having a woman who thinks she is superior to you in any way other than child raising should be an absolute never for every man.

>>54416770
Oblivious women who have a good calm matter become good mothers which can actually be a net positive for your finances big time. Get her to babysit a couple kids along with yours for a free $2-4k per month. Life on easy mode.

>>54416770
>But doesn't metal grow?
>haha nice one
That's not a retort. You lost the argument to her. She accepts your concession.

>>54419367
just get back to cooking sweetie

metal actually does grow
dumbass OP

>>54416770
>Gee, mining sure was dangerous back then. It's dangerous today, but back then...
I refuse to believe you uttered this sequence of words, which throws the existence of this entire dialogue into question

>>54419387
Not a retort either.
You lost the argument. I accept your concession.

>>54416895
Absolute state of /biz/

>>54416770
My ex was going to some movie and the place was called 5d theater or something like that, so she thought the movie would be shown in 5 dimensions

>>54416855
>it wasn't

>synonyms for 'grow'

>>54416770
i think i would've died and gone to heaven if i had to explain basic facts to my wife

>>54416770
Once had a woman ask me why rain isn't salty when it comes from evaporated seawater

>>54419367
Its not an argument when speaking to dummies

>>54419367
>But doesn't fire cool you down?

>>54416770
>Is she just dumb? She's dumb isn't me.
yes shes dumb

>>54416770
Congratulations anon, you now understand that women see the world in an entirely different way to you. The simple version is that as men we have a mechanistic, causal view of the world- this comes from here, that produces that, this does those things, doing this requires that. Women don't. They see the world as a network of social interactions. It's why something like green energy is so appealing to them- they think it's a case of just replacing fossil fuel people with green energy people. Immigrants just magically have a home and exist, no resources consumed. Solving crime? Simply replace violent coppers with peaceful social workers. To women, people just do 'stuff', determined by their temperament and social status (NOT necessity) and the important part is their social relations to one another. Ideas are just social signals, different ways of doing something based on position in the social hierarchy and moral virtue, not actually good or bad ways of running a society. This makes complete sense when you think about the sorts of jobs women do. Even sophisticated female jobs- most types of doctor, teachers, lawyers, corporate shit, are just various types of structured social interaction, nothing practical is actually 'done'. Even women in grounded male jobs like the military are almost always carried through them in a little bubble abstracted away from cold, masculine reality.

As an aside, this is one reason why the modern West is absolutely fucked. Women have no understanding of how to maintain the 'machine' that is the modern world- they don't even percieve it, not truly. Men are also culpable, as they tend to assume by default that all things that exist, even things they don't like, have a 'real' grounded purpose in the functioning of this vast machine- e.g. social workers, voting, the culture industry, immigrants, etc.

If you want to understand more: https://www.738x738.com/post/women

>>54419367
the /pol/ sticky has caused you to erode the value of time and human relations

>>54423171
are you the author? im midway through and its good

>>54423171
To clarify, just in case. A lawyer can basically do anything in their legal bubble and it doesn't matter within their little world. Criminal goes to prison for twenty years or is let off? Doesn't make any difference to the legal world, beyond the impact it has on the lawyers and judges involved in the case. If it's socially 'good' for them to let everyone off (considered high status, benevolent) that's what they'll do. Same with teachers: kids unemployable but know fifty pronouns? Makes no difference in teaching world. If it's socially 'good' and morally 'benevolent' to teach nothing but anal sex, great. In both these examples, letting a murderer off and graduating kids who can barely read will register as 'good' overwhelmingly to women, who have very little relation to reality. Consider this vs a man who can't drive his truck (he crashes, maybe dies), or police cadets who can't shoot properly (they get unlucky, they die), or sailors who don't know how to navigate a ship (they crash, maybe die), builders who dont know how to build (house collapses on them, maybe die). Good vs bad outcomes are defined by REALITY. Men TEND to be more grounded, understand the world as a giant cause and effect machine, and hence are the ones who resist modern insanities- criminals on street means more crime, dumber kids means shittier society, etc.

>>54423291
No, I'm not. He's an anonymous blogger who doesn't promote his work, collaborate with anyone, etc.

>>54416770
Send this in to The dick show. Related stories like this on his show lately.

>he doesn't grow his own metal
NGMI

>>54423171
I tend to agree that this is true for most women. Anecdotally, though, my boss is a woman and she’s absolutely brilliant and an incredible leader in our company. Also, my mother was a professor/author and highly respected in her field.

As much as I want to extrapolate from these examples and prove you wrong, I can’t. 99% of all other women I’ve met in my life fit the description you laid out. Including my wife. But she has huge tits and a fat ass and a small waist so I truly dgaf.<div class="xa23b"><span class="xa23t"></span><span class="xa23i"></span></div>

My cocks grows hard like a rock, op

>>54416871
Did you send it on the matic network and not the eth network? I’ve lost coins doing that

>>54423326
thats a shame, itd be interesting to pick the brain of such a person. i sometimes wonder what leads someone to develop such eloquent insights, i wonder if they have so many thoughts running through their head all the time that they make themselves sick with all the unuseful thinking, and feel they have to atone by writing only those that they can stomach on paper.

>>54416770
>Can I profit from this somehow?
sell her

>>54416770
If you watch Netflix you are way more retarded.

>>54423386
Your cock is filling not magically growing. Do you have a woman mind?

>>54423171
there's some truth to that but its hyperbole, blown out of proportion. men and women have different interests generally speaking and ops gf has no interest or natural curiosity in regards to what metals are and where they come from, something any male and some females would naturally be at least vaguely curious about.

the creatures you're describing could hardly even be said to be sentient, you're describing animals. i'm as misogynist as the next guy but come on, women are fully sentient humans and not just some kind of reactionary social hivemind creature.

or she's fucking with him. to see if hes dumb enough to think shes that dumb. sounds dumb but women generally like to play games, mess with minds. its fun for them somehow, like a prank, to see your reaction.

also women think men are attracted to stupid women so they play it up sometimes pretending to be dumb because they think its hot or something. women go to great lengths to be annoying like that.

>>54416770
If you live in a society where she is allowed to vote and her vote counts as much as yours does, no. You cannot profit. The inevitable collapse will destroy whatever wealth you achieve.

>>54416770
>Netflix
It probably was shit, watch Deadwood.

>>54423377
I'm sure they're both very bright and talented. It doesn't preclude them from being abstracted away from reality. There are plenty of arenas where someone can be successful without having any direct relation to reality whatsoever- and what's telling is that women tend to go nowhere near them. What was your mother's academic field? Think of something like psychology- plenty of esteemed psychologists, zero evidence whatsoever their ideas track reality (the opposite would appear to be the case, given the widespread decline in mental health). Reading up on the false SSRI serotonin hypothesis beloved of psychiatrists and their adjuncts is a great insight into this. Also, congrats on having a big titty wife, ygmi.

>>54423395
He posts a lot, he's very frank about how he thinks (because he doesn't give a shit about pleasing his audience, seemingly). I don't get the impression he edits himself at all, which is what makes it so compelling to read.

>>54423469
Believe whatever you want, I can't do anything about it.

>the creatures you're describing could hardly even be said to be sentient, you're describing animals.
Welcome to the 'longhouse', the default state of man throughout his distance, with rare and noble exceptions. Also one we're currently being sucked back into very rapidly.

>women are fully sentient humans and not just some kind of reactionary social hivemind creature.
That's why they'll cut their sons' nuts off if CNN tells them it's high status, right? Or advocate for decriminalisation of... well, crime, and then whine endlessly about feeling unsafe, of course? Advocate for removing the men they actually want to marry from any access to education and gainful employment?

It's not misogynistic at all. 'Misogyny' is treating women like men with tits and then getting exasperated when it tranpsires that they aren't.

>>54416770
This is a perfect example of why it doesn’t matter if women are complete idiots. The important thing is that they are caring, dutiful, and obedient. And of course above all else, beautiful.

>>54423377
I'm sure they're both very bright and talented. It doesn't preclude them from being abstracted away from reality. There are plenty of arenas where someone can be successful without having any direct relation to reality whatsoever- and what's telling is that women tend to flock to them. What was your mother's academic field? Think of something like psychology- plenty of esteemed psychologists, minimal evidence that their ideas track reality (the opposite would appear to be the case, given the widespread decline in mental health so beloved as a modern narrative). Reading up on the false SSRI serotonin hypothesis espoused by psychiatrists and their adjuncts is a great insight into this. Also, congrats on having a big titty wife, ygmi.

>>54423395
He posts a lot, he's very frank about how he thinks (because he doesn't give a shit about pleasing his audience, seemingly). I don't get the impression he edits himself at all, which is what makes it so compelling to read.

>>54423469
Believe whatever you want, I can't do anything about it.

>the creatures you're describing could hardly even be said to be sentient, you're describing animals.
Welcome to the 'longhouse', the default state of man throughout his distance, with rare and noble exceptions. Also one we're currently being sucked back into very rapidly.

>women are fully sentient humans and not just some kind of reactionary social hivemind creature.
That's why they'll cut their sons' nuts off if CNN tells them it's high status, right? Or advocate for decriminalisation of... well, crime, and then whine endlessly about feeling unsafe, of course? Advocate for removing the men they actually want to marry from any access to education and gainful employment?

It's not misogynistic at all; it's realistic. 'Misogyny' is treating women like men with tits and then getting exasperated when it tranpsires that they aren't.

>>54416855
This anon is right OP. My wife is a drug researcher, tested good IQ, chemical engineering degree etc. - she has no idea how the world works. It's just how all women are. It's ok: women are meant to be childlike so as to better rear children.

>>54416770
why are you dating an underage

>>54423171
wow real big brain thinker here
very high brown analysis there

I would rather spend 150k on surrogate and egg donation and raise my own children by myself than pollute my bloodline with low IQ genes.

>>54416855
Kek, I had almost the same conversation with my ex while watching The Martian. She really asked when men have been on Mars for the first time, glad I dumped her.

>>54423650
hm indeed. it was certainly an enlightening read, the case studies were very valuable, whether they were grounded entirely in real world events or not.
>it seems, frankly, a little distasteful to him; his mother was nothing like that, so he thinks.
was and is still my partial position, though by the end of the reading i'd unlocked a new perspective on the behaviors of my mother towards my stepsister (my father remarried to my mother), and connected it in a wholeness of behavior such that i'd heard of my fathers stories of his first wife, who'd done many of the heinous activities mentioned in the writing through divorce. and some more

one she didnt do however was take my younger than toddler stepsister, not until she was older - she left him and had somehow removed every single piece of furniture from the house, along with all the money from the bank and locked him out of all his accounts. the ways of the mother definitely rubbed off in some ways on the ways of my stepsister (she didnt have my father be the best man at her first wedding, haha). so it makes it easy to side with my mother on that one, but i can definitely see hints of that genetic / family inner machinous way of thought. it will certainly leave me with stuff to think on and observe.

any other readings or articles you would recommend? i am curious whether the seemingly cyphered articles are intended to be readable, though wouldnt know where to start if i was to bother

>>54423935
I generally think of a subject that I'm interested in exploring, and use Google to search his articles, e.g. Carl Jung: 'site:www.738x738.com jung'. You get a feel for what he does and doesn't talk about after a while. If you don't really know, I'd recommend you start with 'Truth'- I found that his writing on it to be incredibly insightful. 'Grail' is a central theme too.

I honestly don't know about the cyphered articles. He wrote a blog post a month or so ago stating that a new alphabet was revealed to him in a dream. Once again, I really don't believe he gives a fuck about making his work accessible (he explicitly states that he doesn't care to do so, in fact). I'd suggest you interpret it how you want to; but don't let it put you off the rest of his work. I get the sense that there's esoteric significance to, for example, the number scheme (which isn't linear)- but I'm not well-read enough to grasp it.

He's taken me down some really strange paths (synchronicities, right now). And- as you related- given me a fresh perspective on my own life. I'm hoping to set aside the time at some point to read through the entire thing.

>>54416770
Even 'smart' women can be retarded in ways men cannot fathom. Don't make the mistake I did in my youth and throw away a great girl for a dumb moment, they are all dumb in many ways and you must deal with that reality. Good luck and make many white babies.

She asked the right questions, and listened obediently to your answers. That's peak womanhood.
If you want a wife who knows all about nucleosynthesis, maybe you need a boywife

>>54416770
>>54416855
Every once in a while a woman who is otherwise very intelligent will suddenly say something so colossally stupid that I have to pause and process it. Don't sweat it OP its just part of being a woman. They can LARP intelligence but at the end of the day they lack the ability to put things together.

>>54416770
>But what about when we run out of metal on the planet?
>Then we can mine asteroids
>But what about when those run out?
>We'll go to mine the Alpha Centauri system
>Where the giant cat people live right? Yay! But what happens when we mine that out one too
>Then eventually a new star will explode and form a new planetary system
>Oh right... But eventually all the stars will explode too? Like do stars grow
>Go to sleep sweetie.

>>54425282
>They can LARP intelligence but at the end of the day they lack the ability to put things together.
Women confirmed for AI

>>54416770
Women just genuinely don't care about the accumulation of knowledge unless it directly relates to how they interact with a man
My girlfriend was an Asian studycel femcel, early action to MIT, must have an IQ of at least 130...but she didn't realize turtles can't breathe underwater because she thought turtles have gills. To say nothing of interesting historical tidbits you *should* have learned in the worst American public school (like FDR being elected 4 times).
I genuinely think women just don't like retaining information as much as men no matter how high their IQs are, unless they're trying to actively prove how much of a girlboss scientist they are to "muh soggy nits".

>>54423469
>women are fully sentient humans and not just some kind of reactionary social hivemind creature.
Holy fuck that was funny, have you tried standup?

>>54423839
>glad I dumped her.
Idiot. Women are supposed to be ignorant but to trust your judgement.

>>54416770
she is a hole, such matters, as is empathy, are alien to her

>>54423742
you seem upset

>>54423839
You idiot. We have had men on mars for some time. And men were there long before ours were.

>>54416770
Most women don't care much about technical details which makes them look much more irrational than men. That's why (hetero) tomboys are so based.

That being said, they generally have a greater "social intelligence" than men. My wife is much better at making new acquaintances than me. In fact I would be more or less a secluded guy without her, as I would spend my time toying with computers, bikes or guns instead of trying to meet new people. And believe it or not, social relationships ARE important, no man is an island, and you need trustful people around you in your life (baby sitting kids, guarding your house and feeding your pets on vacation, and so on). People just need to admit that men and women are different for a good reason, they're supposed to be complementary, that's it.

>>54416770
working in a modern surface mine is actually a comfy gig, underground still sucks but even that pays pretty good and safety is taken really seriously.

People have becomes so disconnected from where resources come from and how manufacturing works.

>>54423600
Klondike was pretty good too, to bad its so short.

>>54416770
Sorry bro, you're dealing with a retard. Retards can be dangerous if you don't keep a leash on them. If you team up with a retard and let them loose, you're going to find yourself in retarded situations. And retard situations are sometimes quite dangerous.
I recommend tricking her into taking an IQ test to understand the severity.

>>54423171
Ok incel

>>54421047
well...why isnt it?

>>54423377
>GPT-4chan

What the fuck

>>54427758
4/1
haha they got me

>>54425279
This anon knows