/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54331775
me too, i can't tell from your cryptic lines and messages

>>54331826
Allow me explained:
Gongo

>>54331826
Buy bitcoin now

>>54332125
They won’t listen. They never do.

>MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM I POSTED THE STOCH RSI CHART AGAIN!
Fuck off already

>>54332413
>>54332125
See? >>54332427

>>54332413
l'macd gun

Nope, looks like a dump on the daily.

>>54331775
it's refreshing to see an anon actually trying to give some useful info instead of an ai bot army trying to move the market.

>>54332823
Check the volume sers my guru ranikesh tells me this are a bull flag
Ranikesh never wrong!!! Always trust ranikesh!!

>>54332830
Ser I an humble ranjeet, only try increase karma as guru ranikesh prefer

you haven't seen the daily&weekly stoch rsi?

>>54333076
Sir I have been posting this since 16k. Weekly and daily charts come and go

>>54331775
your meme indicators means nothing: they always dynamically change and self updates whenever the price goes into a direction, giving you the feel you can predict the next logical move, but it's a scam

why are you using the lookback periods that you are using for these indicators? like the 14 period on these dailies. You know the 14 period was popularized on charts that only have 5 days of price trading a week. so in essense they are actually looking back closer to 3 weeks than 2 which people often think the 14 bar lookback means for "daily" candles.

the actual answer is there is no reason you are using a 14 bar lookback you could use a 10 bar or an 18 or anything else and get completely different signals and messages. you could also choose to calculate these indicators instead of on the "close" of the arbitrary chosen close time close the bars at any given time during the day and your indicators will look different with different signals. or instead of closing you could use the mean price of daily bar. or even the "point of control" as it is called.

point is your daily calculated indicators are stupid and using just 1 point of data a snapshot of 1 price at 1 time each day when there was hundreds of thousands of other points of data you could calculate the exact same thing and get wildly different results.

but really why are you using the typical 14 bar lookback period for crypto when it was popularized for stocks not forex or a commodity or crypto. I would really like to know.

>>54332750
the nocoin niggers bearish on this board is an indicator to the top, we have 2 years of nocoiner cope till they are buying in!

>>54333202
>>54333144
I wonder: will you deny these plots all the way to the top, or will you capitulate and actually earn some money instead of losing it through over leveraged shorts?

Still bearish.

Should I dump 5k into BTC or wait?

>>54333739
Just wait for the next 10% dip

>>54333739
DCA if you haven’t already been doing so.

>>54333483
you didn't answer any of my questions. this isn't a cause and effect. your charts are not the cause of price going up. you are claiming you can forecast future price from these charts and I explained why you can't because your use of the data is flawed. I have no opinion on the future price of bitcoin but you must recognize using these flawed calculations on flawed data are not actually building a case.

>>54331775
>still short and strong
>still out of the market and strong

but jokes aside you really need to triply confirm timeframes cause there are too many retards here
what op is saying if you arent a swingie but a hodler buy here and wait 3 years

if you are a swingie then yes jsut like 2019 we will see a small peak and drawdown again, it will crash once the reality of the recession hits, but it will not set new lows

>>54331775
Did you ask papa FED?
Your TA magic is nice on paper and all, but buttcorn has never seen a recession.

>>54333086
>Weekly and daily charts come and go
explain please

>>54335016
he has no idea what he's talking about

>>54335016
It means you might as well be looking at the 3 minute charts.

>>54333997
Didn’t read your blogpost anon. We gongo and there’s nothing you can do about it.

>>54335421
all charts are the same it is just how you are choosing to snapshot your data and you could even calculate your same indicators in OP with a 3 minute chart there are 480 2 minute candles in 1 day so if you used a period of 6,720 for your indicators in OP you would be calculating the same thing just with more granular data.

>>54335465
>all charts are the same
>even the 3 minute charts show the BTC halving cycle!
Retard alert

>>54335487
fuck do you mean? you don't have a screen big enough to show it but a computer sees it on the 3 minute if you have it calculate it.

its the same data just better in everyway. like how 1 second or 1 tick data is better than 3 minute. there is no arguing this.

>>54335512
What kind of retardation are you spouting? You sound like a sw*ngie confusing me for one too. See >>54334535
this thread is not for sw*nglets/wagies. Good luck in warehouse tomorrow btw

>>54335541
I just want you to justify your use of the indicators in the OP and specifically your chosen look back periods. if you can't you have no evidence for any position. you have clearly in previous posts asserted that these indicators have value so explain why. describe how the mathematics on daily closing candles at these look back periods have relevance to anything.

>>54335581
The pattern is self-evident in the OP image. If you are too stupid to see it that’s on you.

>>54331826
dump to 4k incoming

>>54335421
You missed a reply, sir.

>>54335611
you are too dumb to understand both the data and the mathematics behind these indicators and are just fooled by randomness

>>54335644
Alright. Let’s talk again at 40k.

>>54335672
its a 50/50 guess wether it goes up or down m8 at the end of the day its not impressive if you are right. explain why you think it is going up is your only argument these daily indicators and a pattern you have convinced yourself you see in this data calculated off just 14 points of data? for an asset that has millions of transactions a day? you know these indicators are not the cause of price going up right? there is no cause and effect from these statistical studies...

>>54335690
>I’m certain it’ll dump!!!1!
>well, actually it’s 50/50…
Lol the backtracking has ALREADY begun. Kys

>>54335710
I havn't said it will dump or go up m8. What are the time frames for your forecasts? again are your forecasts just off of a pattern you believe you see in these indicators without understanding the underlying data and mathematics?

>>54331844
Gongo?
More like whengo?

>>54332413
Isnt it too late to keep buying BTC and better to buy alta instead because of the greater upside?

>>54335690
>in this data calculated off just 14 points of data? for an asset that has millions of transactions a day?
this is reaching new levels of midwit i didnt think possible, really anon thats what you are worrying about
both ends of the iq barbell say buy when line is at bottom and inching up, you are trapped in analysis paralysis

>>54335753
bro markets are psychology driven so more ppl believe rsi length = 14 is significant the more weight it holds
plus OP historically was correct plus macro favors hard assets atm

>>54338062

Bump

>>54331844
Gongo? As in gonna go down? Probably a safe bet to ride a short from here to $20k isn't it?

>>54340068
DO IT AND POST IT FAGGIT

>>54340068
22k perhaps.