/biz/ - Business & Finance

is this ISO20022

-6.41%

>>54135864
Blockchains are shit.

Hashgraphs are better.

They make link tokens on the hedera network that I can buy on crypto.com I'll invest in that shit.

They say it's like the internet. It'll all end up running on the best protocol available eventually. Just wait for eth2.0 to get haxxed

>>54135864
No mention of chainlink ever by swift apart from that shitty proof of concept

LinkLoser shill thread

>>54135964
>Hashgraphs are better.
>*gets hacked*

So that's why we are dumping

>>54135888
>checked
yep

>>54135864
my fucking sides that you retards still think swift is using some blockchain bullshit in 2023

>>54135964
didnt hashgraph gets hacked? i know you're desperate but fuck off to some other thread in biz
>https://rekt.news/hedera-rekt/

>>54136016
what part of blockchain agnostic do you not understand?

>>54136016
they are
https://chainlinktoday.com/chainlink-and-swift-announce-ccip-proof-of-concept-at-smartcon-2022/

>>54135864
forgot to add the link to the tweet
>https://twitter.com/swiftcommunity/status/1635995376397295618?t=cEZbFxOVMVXU7VItiicPRw&s=19

>>54135864
> u guessed it, using chainlink ccip.
You're literally just pulling that out of your ass.

>>54135976
>>54136028
>by being extra retarded, they won’t see me seething
Uniswap v2 code running on bridges got exploited, nothing more. But you’d know that if you weren’t retarded.

>>54135864
Nah, m8, they are using ETH to build CBDC smart contracts! Source: I heard it in a dream!

>>54135864
I listened to the whole podcast and the things that stood out to me that are relevant to your post are:

>Sergey asked what to expect in 2023 and he responds "I think every year is going to be the year things really take off, but that also never happens. So I'm going to say this is the year again, but I may have a very different perspective when November or December comes around
>I can't predict what any of the future utility will be of any of this technology, so we're just trying to offer a bunch of shit and hope that something useful will be developed that makes use of Chainlink

For anyone who didn't waste over an hour of their time listening to the podcast, there was UNEQUIVOCALLY absolutely ZERO mentioning of anything specific or major happening this year. There was nothing specific mentioned at all. A bunch of general BS.

Sergey was asked why token needed and he literally basically said "this isn't really well understood and I would suggest people look into cryptoeconomic security for this." The interviewer tried to double back and talk about the "cryptoeconomic security" of bitcoin being that miners have a financial interest in their ASICs and Ethereum node operators having their ETH staked in nodes to mine tokens...however, neither of these comparisons make sense for Link because: A) Node operators don't have to stake Link right now, and B) Node operators can earn Link regardless.

So it kind of seems like there is no real reason for the Link token, at least not yet...

>>54135964
>Hashgraphs are better

There's only one hashgraph retard, and it is just a DAG, another data structure, that accomplishes scalability by being more centralized.

Also, wtf does this have to do with Chainlink? Hedera is trying very hard to get Chainlink oracles integrated despite CLL being on the governing council of Hedera.

So.... what? should I buy LINK? Is it gonna x600?

>>54136102
Anon, using this to claim they are using blockchain for anything is similar to Toyota building some hydrogen fuel cell car proof of concept and then being like "BRUH TOYOTAS USE HYDROGEN FUEL CELLS"

Just because Swift is doing a proof of concept using blockchains and chainlink doesn't mean that Swift's business offers any of these things to consumers. It's a "maybe" that maybe one day they'll use it for something if they see it being useful. That day isn't today, it isn't this month, and it won't be this year. We would be very fortunate if it is before the end of 2025 honestly

>>54135864
>it's coming up this march, if you listened to the sergey podcast with clg, he clearly said :
>he likes the meme where he beat up the bear, and clearly says march is it.
MEDS NOW

ITS XRP YOU DUMB FUCKS

>>54136483
A compromised Uniswap bridge led to the downing of an important part of Mainnet?

>>54136643
>>54136796
I listened to it as well and to be honest for the first time I unironically feel like it’s over, at least for this cycle, maybe in 2030 things might improve. If I weren’t staked I’d probably move all my link into bitcoin right now, and probably will do that end of year anyways. Link/btc seeing new lows as well.

Literally the only thing I can hang my hat on is that I’m a midwit and the fact I genuinely believe it’s over and time to capitulate is a sign it’s actually just beginning. But this same flawed reasoning could also be applied to any failed project.

>>54135888
its not

>>54137163
chainlink isnt a blockchain, it's middleware that allows swift to interact with blockchains, they vould wie xrp to the xrp chain using chainlink, they arnt in competition at all, actually the real competitor of xrp isnt link, its sxift themselves, they are doing (using link) what xrp failed to do (onboard banks)

>>54137268
I've felt like it is over for a while. The only thing that gives me hope is "industry insiders" still being really excited about Chainlink and knowing that if "Web3" grows, it'll need chainlink. It's just all tiresome at this point. I think I've gotten more insight into things since I was a 2017 n00b and it all just looks so useless and shitty (as highlighted by all of the NFT projects and uniswap clones being basically the only things created using this "revolutionary tech").

There seemed to be some kind of "insider mystique" back then, but now it is just clear that basically everyone in the tech world is retarded and everything was surviving off of cheap money and just creating technology to spy on people and serve ads and none of it is profitable or useful or even a net good in the world.

>>54136796
Toyota does sell hydrogen fuel cell vehicles though

I don't want to be rude, but why would the central bank niggers choose an off the shelf coin that the plebs already hold, and thus benefit from adoption, rather than at the very least forking something and telling everyone to get fucked?

>>54137799
>dude dont think about that just buy my bags, look at this screen cap of a guy saying 1k eoy while he got dubs!!

>>54135888
Nah. ISO is a complete system. Swift is only a messaging service, which will be replaced by the whole ISO system.

>>54137761
I didn't know that because no one owns them in the USA. The analogy makes even more sense then because Swift DOES use some more obscure blockchains like symbiont for some small use cases...but that is all. And it'll be a while before that changes.

>>54137799
Because the most talented and innovative engineers and researchers work for Chainlink, so Chainlink will always be a superior technology to anyone trying to fork and copy it. Additionally, Chainlink has a major network component that is constantly growing of large and small data providers already participating in the system. The central bankers are instead just going to impose their will onto the operation of this technology, and they already are doing so in some very interesting ways that aren't really discussed here ever.

It isn't as simple as you're suggesting.

>>54138054
Anon, do you work for Chainlink?

>>54135864
The banks can't release CCIP anon....if they're already bankrupt...
You thought they wouldn't do this? That they wouldn't crash the entire world economy to stop Link pumping? Think again...

>>54137799
>forking something
Link threads are just the same thing over and over again
>>/biz/thread/S6580769#p6582328

>>54135864
Imagine promoting your corporation backed virtual coins like it's a thing to be proud of.
Fucking garbage.

>>54138426
>t. Jason Parser
you'll never get away with it

>>54137163
damn straight it is.

>>54136102
when it comes out this year or next that this has been abandoned, you are going to be suicidal. It will similar to that shipping blockchain use case that's already been dumped.

Also this "POC" is just a side project that literally one person at Swift was assigned to so they can check the box on "looking into" blockchain tech. It's very telling that outside of this, they never mention Chainlink, just like they didn't in OP's post.

And the CEO is making podcasts with a twitter personality that calls himself "God" where they talk about absolutely nothing. Two pre pubescent virgins having a sleepover basically.


You are seeing the warning signs and looking the other way.

>>54137750
What I’ve learned is besides bitcoin, everything else in crypto only exists to make someone else money. And chainlink simply doesn’t have the level of investment from either tradfi or vc’s/insiders to justify ever pumping to any meme valuations and make them money. Any actual fundamental value for the token is likely a literal decade or more from being realized. I’m not even discounting that it could be an Amazon like success story, but the reality that a lot of anons didn’t account for is it took a decade with an already sizable initial investment for anyone to get rich holding Amazon. And everyone else’s base case was 2017 eth, but that only happened because the right people were already holding eth in 2017, but the right people aren’t holding chainlink now, so you’ll never see a run on that scale and magnitude for link.

At this point I’m convinced the people still obsessed with fudding are just convinced they can will themselves out of capitulation, but its clearly time to move on. Even wasting time talking about link feels like posting in a /ptg/ thread in 2017, talking to a bunch of discord trannies and out of touch boomers, wondering what went wrong.

>>54138628
Well said. I've been following crypto since '16 and have basically arrived at the same position. I've noticed that trend, where typically the longer someone has been in the space, the more they gravitate to being a btc and/or eth maxi.

>>54138628
fuck off you btc maxipad
BTC would be worthless if monero came first
blockchain is just a word for applied cryptography
BTC isn't special there are many versions of it
however for some reason every oracle that tries to compete with chainlink fails.

>>54138754
ETH is garbage too, what happened with bsc and the l1 war last cycle proved that to me. Nothing is a better bitcoin, but BNB has been a better Ethereum for what it’s actually used for (shitcoin casino) for the last 4 years. To me if I were to ever feel bullish on ETH again, it would be even moreso for link, because the only positives for ETH over BNB are all related to actual fundamentals and potential real world usecases, which requires oracles. Until then though it’s bitcoin only, and I wonder if after how awful last cycle was, maybe it’s time for a bitcoin only cycle to cleanse the entire space. Far too many midwits still own shitcoins, we might need a good 5 years where all shitcoins bleed to zero to reset things.

>>54135864

There is an insane coverup going on re: Chainlink and its potential. There are paid FUD posters on this forum trying to make sure newfags don't understand the implications of the rollout of a system like this.

Chainlink is one of the most important inventions in human history, and many people here own a large chunk of this network. They will do anything to try to get us to sell so that we can't 'rock the boat'.

Do you really think ESL fudders know more than Sandro Salsano and Eric Schmidt? Ari Juels? etc

>>54138846
I use monero all the time, it’s not a better bitcoin because it will never see mainstream adoption. I’m not even a btc maxi, just a realist who can accept real world smart contract usecases are probably minimum 5-10 years from mattering.

>>54136102
Better and cheaper ways of keeping ledgers when you don't care about decentralization. (Visa, Mastercard) Why would they need it?

>>54138980
Also this conspiracy shit doesn’t help my bearishness at all. I have 10k link staked and some retard who probably bought his first link in 2020 after migrating here from /pol/ is trying to tell me it’s all paid demoralization. Christ.

>>54137799
The off the shelf coin the plebs already hold is the coin they put on the shelf in the first place. They had to make an open source decentralized oracle solution else it wouldn't be accepted by the Web3 space.

>>54139022

I don't want to help your bearishness, I don't give a fuck about you, your suspicious amount of LINK staked (it maxed out at 7k so you're probably larping), or your scripted response to my post. I hope your boss notices that you don't even know the staking allotment.

chainlink 1k eoy

>>54139110
Fuck off /pol/ schizo, suspicious amount are you fucking retarded? I had 10k, 2 eligible wallets, one got 7k in early access and I threw the remainder in at general access because I was certain surely 2023 will be like 2019. Except it’s not and we’re actually seeing new lows in sats, with absolutely no mainnet like catalyst to look forward to, Sergey all but admitting in that podcast that CCIP likely isn’t released this year. Im not even fudding in a general sense, I genuinely believe if there’s a long term future for crypto, chainlink is at the center of it. But just like Amazon and google didn’t immediately explode after the dotcom crash, there’s way too much trash in this market and not near enough real demand to believe it’s happening in the next year or two.

>>54138846
>if my aunt had balls, she’d be my uncle

>>54137564
XRP doesn't do anything. It's a token on a ledger.
You seem to MAYBE be talking about Ripple?
Who doesn't even run the XRPL or have voting power over it. So not sure what you even mean.

The XRPL is the fastest and most reliable DLT on the planet though.

>>54138932
you're not wrong...I still think ETH has one more run in it that will put in somewhere between $7,000 - $10,000, but who knows.

>>54138980
The appeals to authority/conspiracy bullshit hasn't worked the last few years and yet you still triple down on it. Einstein had a nice quote about repeating the same results...

>>54138985
>>54139022
How many posts do you think you'll make in this thread faggot? 20? 30? I bet you're one of the retards that got burnt on Celsius, Bancor, LPL, etc... And now you're so mentally broken you fud every Link discussion with your two digit IQ takes.

I'll take Sergey, Ari, Schmidt, and all of the best minds in Crypto over some butthurt biz nigger.

>>54139313
bro who gives a shit about how xrp or ripple works, they are literally being sied and have used the shitcoin to launder and steal money.

>>54135972
I will fuck these whores with my BTC (big thick cock). Something Linkcels will never understand.

>>54136102
Linkcel can't even afford to charge his phone. Don't worry just watch some muttmerican entertainment on Netflix, you mega faggot.

>>54139366
>all of his scripted points literally addressed a few posts up

you might be retarded

I’ll say it again, even with Signet taking a hit, no one is interested in Ripple Labs shit products. Imagine that signature bank faults and no one even clamors for Ripple CuckoldNet to come save the day. People are sticking with Signet. You know why? Ripple cannot beat the Tasset model and likely won’t. XRP is a charity coin for Ripple Labs. I hope their holders get the death penalty and the mods ban their astroturfing and threads like they did in 2017.

>>54135888
I'm glad NXRA is already in the process of joining the ISO20022

>>54136091
Blockchain is indeed scaling up the activities of almost all sector in the world. The crypto payment adoption is one to look into as the likes of BinancePay, Zoidpay and cryptMI are making adoption increase faster.

>>54135888
checked and also YES.

>>54139323
$7k eth, I'll be there no matter what
add that to $5 matic, $5 ride and I'm made for life

>>54139384
kek
RIPPLE is being sued.
But they are literally just a group of people that hold a bunch of XRP.
Really no effect on the ledger or it's operation at all. Hopefully Ripple has to burn the escrow.

>>54136766
Not happening
Don't buy it

>>54138980
There is literally no evidence that Sandro Salsano has any relationship with Chainlink or ever did. There was a video made by Chainlink Tonight talking about a relationship, but no evidence was shown that can be replicated in this thread.

Also, that was five years ago. Additionally, Ari Juels is a literal who college professor that you've only heard of because of his association with Chainlink and I'm not sure that we really have any evidence that he has put out anything valuable in the real world. Finally, there's Eric Schmidt and we know nothing about his association with Chainlink and his fireside speech was largely about how the entire web3 space is way overhyped and overvalued. In the past we also "had" Tom Gonser and there was endless excitement about things like The Idea Act of 2020 or whatever it was called that was DEFINITELY going to use Chainlink to digitize all official US Government documents in some sort of Docusign+Chainlink working agreement.

We've just seen so much stuff that was "definitely supposed to happen" and the reality of what happened is: NFTs and convoluted ways to exchange shitcoins like Aave, Uniswap, etc.

I can't even try to pretend like there is going to be some major revolution using Chainlink because I now understand the absolute state of this technology: it is literally just about trying to force a shitty token into a bunch of retarded use cases. "LET'S TRY TO MAKE AN NFT THAT LETS YOU ACCESS A CONCERT!" "LET'S MAKE ANOTHER UNISWAP CLONE THAT TRADES NIGGER INU FOR EVEN CHEAPER!"

All the "real world" use cases we see are "proofs of concept" or other BS that uses recognizable logos like that recent Vodafone thing. WTF Was that even? Something to let your electric car automatically buy electricity? Come on...

>>54138932
Last BTC cycle had ftx creating 1 year of paper supply which kept the price down.

>>54139667
Keep dreaming bobo
We're not seeing these prices anytime soon

>>54139366
I haven't lost any Link, but I did hold from $52 to the current price and have followed all the breadcrumbs since 2017 and I've gotten to the point where I don't expect much from Chainlink or from public blockchains any time soon.

>>54140387
nice reddit spacing

>>54140387
Post the TradeLens twitter screenshot

>>54140387
sad but true. crypto is about installing unneeded tokens to force me to pay for free things on the internet like jpegs.
bitcoin is probably the worst example of this as it has been around for so long people think they need to stack sats to use the internet. this is simply false.
eth tries to convince people that computers need gas to use the internet. again factually incorrect. Computers use electricity not gas to access the internet.
The rest of the industry is trying to install price per clicks involving tokens and they want you to swap these do nothing tokens for other tokens that also do nothing.
At Least Chainlink is meta about the whole thing. They want you to pay for data feeds so the system works. But really who cares if do nothing token 1 (monero) is worth more or less than do nothing token number 2 (xrp) none of them seem to do anything except make me pay more money for using the internet

>>54140485
ha that would be me
I'm so glad other anons have stepped up, you can't handle the truth can you

>>54139667
holoride got that dawg in it to pull it off, just need that one spark to light it up

>>54140478
Nice ignoring any content based on allowing your entire perspective to be developed through meaningless memes (i.e. "reddit spacing")

>>54140819

Only a weirdo outsider would respond like this.

>>54140860
>no true 4channer fallacy
fuck off retard

>>54140760
This isn't the first similar project that cost a bunch of money and resulted in nothing of value.

https://www.ibm.com/blockchain/solutions/trust-your-supplier

>>54135864
>$6.50

Swift sure is good about curtailing its insider trading. Congratulations linkers!

>>54140819
nice reddit whine

>>54140912
>>54140760

Tradelens was not popular because they were trying to sell a "Private Blockchain". They shut it down when they realized the incentives work better in decentralized systems. You will need a Chainlink oracle to retain custody of your data in a decentralized system.

>>54136102
>t. cuckold

>>54137799
Try to understand why defective is important first

>>54140387
>All the "real world" use cases we see are "proofs of concept" or other BS that uses recognizable logos like that recent Vodafone thing. WTF Was that even? Something to let your electric car automatically buy electricity? Come on...

Are you fucking stupid?

>Cold chain monitoring
>Ensure the transportation of goods is within safety tolerance with control and monitoring of cold supply chain.

>Supply chain transparency
>Track and monitor goods in transit, keeping record of border checks and transactions associated with supplies.

When you bought your Japanese fuck doll, I'm sure you wanted to know where it was and how fast it would come.

>>54140952
I'm reading about it, and nothing I'm reading suggests what you're saying to be true. Can you provide anything that says the reason for failing was "not using a public blockchain?"

Because everything I'm seeing is that just not enough market participants were interested in using the system for them to justify continuing putting resources toward it...

>>54140812
I feel the team is focused more on the product and putting it in shape with less emphasis on token price for now
we'd see how it plays out kek

>>54140478
>>54140931
What is your purpose here nigger? You’re clogging up a discussion like a retarded NPC bot. Let the big brains have a conversation.

>>54135864
Yaaass xrp sisters!!

>>54141082
What are you talking about? The system you just described already exists, doesn't need a blockchain, and has nothing to do with anything I mentioned. Here are a few excerpts though:

>Vodafone has launched an “Economy of Things” platform – the next-generation Internet of Things (IoT).
>The “economy of Things” enables electric vehicles (EV) to make direct payments with charging stations as well as other devices to conduct secure transactions.
>Vodafone has been at the forefront in venturing into blockchain technology among the telecommunication companies as it announced auctioning of the first ‘Merry Christmas’ text as NFT last year December.

Wow, truly exciting! It is literally tech world bull shit.

>>54141176
"big brains" bought under $1, newfag

>>54141247
Truth or trust? Do you understand the concept of lying to provide a false sense of hope? or what chainlink is trying to achieve?

>>54136102
Jesus, that is exciting! No wonder Chainlink mooned and you are rich beyond your wildest dreams.

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/successful-testing-paves-way-cbdc-use-cross-border

Ctrl-F
>0 results

>>54141255
Congratulations. You've spent more time on 4chan than any of us. You're truly an OLDFAG. You definitely know all the memes and lingo and we're all grateful for and impressed by all of the time you've spent here. We all surely hope that one day we can look back on our lives and relish in the fact that we've spent so many years posting on 4chan.

>>54138530
its over

Jason Parser is shadowforking LINK right now

>>54141329
>TRUTH OVER TRUST
If you're relying on an IoT device to ensure your meat never went over 28 degrees, it doesn't matter how many oracle nodes you feed that data through. Large grocery store chains already use this technology. There is just no need for a blockchain or oracles. The IoT device sends out an alert if the temperature goes outside of the desired range and the product is rejected. I genuinely have no idea what you're trying to say and it is tiresome how people always come up with this stupid use cases that already have existing solutions that don't need a blockchain.

The best use cases for blockchains are probably in reconfiguring the global financial system to reduce counterparty risk. Not in trying to reconfigure systems that already work perfectly like the one you're trying to describe

t. worked in a major grocery store in the meat department where we rejected products plenty of times based on this system.

>>54141375
look buddy I'm really sorry you bought the top but you should really stop whining, it's unseemly

>>54141331
>NASA (Nigger Astronaut Scientist Association) WARNS OF IMPENDING EARTH FINNA SHOOT OFF INTO OUTER SPACE

>>54135864
>using chainlink

>>54135864
link will be brought down to 0.0005 and all of you retards will still make these gay threads

Looking forward to the summer of link, check out all these salty fags posting essays on why link bad

>>54139667
kek jeet bot post right on cue, like I said all shitcoins probably need to take a dirtnap for a cycle, let bitcoin ride between 20-60k for 4 years.

>>54140760
>>54140912
>>54140952
Look at CXO.
It actually works and makes money. Big corporations are full of bloat and can't even.
They are mandatory for BoL in the entire country of Egypt and negotiating deals with other MENAs now.

>>54135864
I've spoken with some seemingly otherwise pretty reasonable people who really seem to think and believe that swift using chainlink in some way is unironically the catalyst in link becoming a non-joke investment, and them personally making it...
I don't know whether this is going to give them some closure, or if they're too far gone...
Gonna be weird days for sure as link continues to under perform indefinitely...

>>54141506

>>54136016
>SWIFT: Connecting CBDCs
>Ctrl + f "DLT" (Distribute Ledger Technology aka Blockchains)
>30 results

https://files.catbox.moe/9lenly.pdf

>>54141495
>t. worked in a major grocery store in the meat department where we rejected products plenty of times based on this system.
bahahahahaha

>>54141506
Should I go on?

>>54138628
Pretty much, but it's even worse than you say since you'd really only get rich if it's like Amazon if it was an actual stock or some other form of security.
The token is a bootstrapping mechanism for funding and there's zero law or incentive to enrich /biz/.
>t. the oracle of common sense

>>54135972
Still holding

>>54141506
Because I have many of these emails nigger

>>54135864
fake, as usual
how heavy are those bags

>>54141506

>>54141729

To be completely honest, I think SWIFT announcing that they're using LINK (which they are) wouldn't even have an effect on the price. It's not like XRP baggies would suddenly go and sell their bags for LINK. I don't really know how I'm going to make it, but I don't think it's going to happen for a while.

>>54141506
There's at least 40k Link worth of withdrawals that were all purchased below 40 cents. Can you shut the fuck up now you absolute faggot? Or should I keep posting?

>>54141838
This

>>54141776
I'm on month 2 of nofap

>>54141851
Wow bro you're such a loser. 20 pbtid . Why do people talk so much about things they dislike or are "irrelevant"

>>54141851
ser why you do the redeem

>>54135864
>2 blockchains
XRP and Corda

>>54141909
When did I say I dislike Chainlink or that it is irrelevant?

>>54141951
close

>>54141909
Are you fucking braindead? He just proved to you he talks about it because he owns a fuckload of it, seems pretty logical to me. Probably tens of thousands more than you do too, ironically.

>>54140387
https://angelmatch.io/investors/sandro-salsano

btw found this. But I wonder if there is even any connection anymore between SmartContract.com and Chainlink...

>>54141983
Do you still work in the meat department packing up peoples meat?

>>54142052
Pretty sure smartcontract.com is chainlink labs dude

>>54135864
cool but we all know link will be a -3.7%

>>54141375
funny how you don’t care enough to post all of your addresses on 4chan to prove a point to someone who’s trolling you

>>54136766
6.66x600=3996
Checked.

>>54142666
um no satan only Bulgarian transexuals from discord named Michael use the phase 'ChainlinkLabs'

>>54141557
Heard that in ‘21 and ‘22. Youre living in the past

>>54141495
This. Guys like Sergey dont understand this though because they are dreamers. Hes probably never worked an honest job. There isnt going to he some day when computers and technology come in and fix all your problems. Cant trust a guy who a) cant keep himself in shape when hes young and b) cant get laid.

>>54141909
When would you guys say this type of response started to become common biz. I dont recall seeing it much pre-20. Really odd and lame. Let me ask, did you come here from wallstbets?

>>54135864
All you faggots cheering on cripple and chainlink for CBDCs are the downfall of freedom.

Turkeys voting for Christmas.

Fucking retards.

>>54141495
You want the blockchain environment for any time you're conducting business with a counterparty and there is a risk of someone walking away without handling their obligations. IoT are just data sensors to add more information to verify if a condition is met.

>>54141728
https://etherscan.io/address/0xF8D6c0FeABB19cEF580e97E8ED4832AFf44A8Ec5#tokentxns

I KNEEL

>>54142666
Checked. He didn't about the connection lol.

>>54143846
https://etherscan.io/address/0x420469f41f6b486f1a134ef1328610cea4c7fedd#tokentxns
>To Coinbase 4
Did he sell?

>>54136643
What more information do you need? The token is used to pay for services, and staking. People want more security guarantee so they utilize dons with a greater amount staked, which increases fees for that Don, now you have other dons that want that fee so now you have competition between dons for who can provide the greatest security. Why is economics not a mandatory course for everyone? It’s simple supply and demand. But you already knew that.

it's happening, but this time it's fr fr

>>54138170
He can write in complete sentences. Actual Chainlink employees might actually be retarded judging by their output.

>>54144719
Okay serious question time why do crypto ghouls want honest and hardworking neets to pay for things that are already free on the internet?

>>54144719
none of the things u mentions are real, why do chainniggers make up shit?

>>54145096
WHAT IS THE VALUE OF TRUTH?

YOU HAVE NO SOUL, AS SUCH YOU DO NOT VALUE TRUTH.

BEGONE.

THIS IS NOW A LINK POSITIVITY THREAD.

>DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT
>ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT.

Christ the fudding isn’t even high quality anymore, it just keeps getting more and more unhinged

>>54145327
the price speak for itself, fucking bagholder

>>54145327

LINK is going to 1k like ETH did in 2017. SWIFT flipping the switch will be the "EEA" moment for Chainlink. SWIFT will be shilling us.

>>54145364
>CuQ id

Lol

>>54145378
COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT IS ALL THAT IS NEEDED.

MEANINGLESS DATES WITH ANOTHER CHAINLINK CLIENT WILL NOT CREATE 1K EOY.

ONLY WE CAN MAKE THAT CHANGE WITH COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT.

>>54145265
pretty sure I won't be able to access truth without an internet connection that's provided by government controlled ISPs.
>but anon these are private companies in some countries
I'm sure when the government says shut it down they will kill your pathetic truth dream demon

>>54145265
>DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT
>ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT.>DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT
>ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT.>DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT
>ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT.>DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF POSITIVE THOUGHT
>ESPECIALLY COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT.

>>54145454
YOU ARE A GREMLIN RAGING AT THE COMING LIGHT. YOU WILL NOT MAKE IT AS YOU ARE.

THERE IS TIME TO CHANGE.

I BELIEVE IN YOU.

I BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF COLLECTIVE POSITIVE THOUGHT.

I boughted more LINKs today

>>54139356
Einstein was a fucking kike.

>>54135888
It's ISO666

>>54145793
no, he was a black woman

>>54145639
This poster is a demon anons find Jesus but not organized religion stack LINK BTC Meth and Cocaine
Use mushrooms to find Jesus its your only hope

>>54135888
I'm in banking and briefly worked with an ISO implementation project. The change internally was to message format, from a simple string MT where bank to bank the conventions of messages changes, impacting sanctions screening, to a rich text MX with defined fields.
I have no idea why ISO has anything to do with crypto.

>>54137799
Because we generally have a policy to investigate three off the shelf solutions and compare those to high level estimates of building in house. Often the development time and skill gap in house is prohibitive, often it's cheaper to go COTS because they're selling at scale.
It doesn't mean we also go with them, I've been on several projects where the products on the market just didn't meet business requirements and we sunk 5 years into build and test.
Which, for something of this scale, is a reasonable estimate.
Hell, just integrating a COTS system into the existing infrastructure will still take you 2.

>>54146045
>>54146177
>words words words
yesh sorry bro I think the internet should be free for everyone I don't want to help you crypto ghouls attach prices to things that today are free. I want my children to enjoy a free internet just like I had it

>>54146296
Schizo, you replied to the wrong gent. I'm talking about banking. We don't give a shit about the broader internet when we're on the clock.
For internet freedom, I just come here, have done for 15 ish years. That and pirate bay.

>>54140387
Dont forget the spotify use case which was laughable. Something about how starving artists should be paid per song and chainlink somehow does that…hahahaha, christ

>>54146383
I can tell by the tone of your pixels you are red faced and foaming at the mouth because of my post
>18 cryptographically verified digits
>tnn
>6.58
>seven years in the making
oh boy this is really going to make him mad lol

>>54146440
>Dont forget the spotify use case which was laughable. Something about how starving artists should be paid per song and chainlink somehow does that…hahahaha, christ
cope harder

>>54146541
Just opened spotify, still working flawlessly as is. Does blockchain make the sound quality better too? What about headphones? Do I even need those anymore when Link is involved or do they put oracles in my ears?

>>54140917
>Swift sure is good about curtailing its insider trading. Congratulations linkers!

With enough volume and wash trading its pretty easy to keep the price flat while accumulating.

I mean look at the daily volume its almost 400 Million. That quite a bit. Its 19th in volume today higher than its MCAP spot.

We have went perfectly sideways for months now.

>>54143628
Stay poor, I suppose. The system is going down regardless. Fucking adapt. I’d rather be a house nigger than working the fields.

https://www.20022.info/news-und-infos/

>>54146045
>I have no idea why ISO has anything to do with crypto.
>a rich text MX with defined fields.
Based on my rudimentary understanding, having the messages essentially written in an XML type code makes them more accessible to smartcontracts and "crypto". I'm a brainlet though, I just look at the current MT format and see what looks like a handwritten note, and then I look at the MX format and see code and just assume that's the difference that interfaces the whole thing with web3 blockchain stuff.

>>54147617

>>54147779

>>54136796
can literally buy one

ISO hasn't got anything to do with link. That said i am really hoping to see CCIP any day now.

>>54135864
This is cool

What about the open banking API initiative (PSD2 I believe it was called)? Has that come to pass? with ISO20022 coming, that would go hand in hand with Functions and CCIP to enable crazy fucking use cases. Cross chain smart contracts combined with data directly from the bank in iso20022 format. Holy fuck im cooming!

The pieces are all falling into place.

yeah thats nice and all, but have you considered that token not needed?

>>54148340
>The pieces are all falling into place.
this
after 1000 years eoy Satan will be loosed from his prison

>>54139022
link was the downpayment on my condo. turned $50 in feb 2018 into 19k swing trading, and i learned about it here one day when i was super depressed studying for the bar exam. biz and link saved me that day.

>>54141686
>ctrl + f chainlink
>0 results

thanks for playing

>>54148792
The guy I was responding to said SWIFT would have nothing to do with blockchains. We weren't talking about Chainlink. Obsess more.

>>54148853
I am that guy moron, check the ID. SWIFT will not use Chainlink or blockchains for anything and you're being misdirected

>>54148874
your wrong

>>54148874
Can you explain to me what "Distributed Ledger Technology" means in a context that does NOT refer to blockchains? I'm all ears.

>>54143628
btw its thanksgiving in our part of the world (America)

>>54148545
>that image

>>54148911
The imminent update is to their messaging standard which will operate the same way but work to communicate with other standards. It's not related to blockchain. They have no plans to utilize blockchain and you're being fooled.

>>54148955
Yes I'm being fooled by them using the term "DLT" thirty times in their paper about connecting CBDCs to each other, lmao

>>54141375
nta but , I really think you would fit in better over on another site or even just posting on twitter

>>54148874
that guy is such a retard kek

>>54148976
PoC in a sandbox environment is different from what you’re expecting

>>54138932
>Far too many midwits still own shitcoins
>BTC maxi
>not a midwit
kek retard

>>54149782
We got a live one here fellas.

>>54136091
Any of what you just said. Bullish.

I’m so utterly blackpilled that I just don’t see Link pumping for years to come.

>>54148545
obvious scam

wow, i left my thread for 1 day and come back to this full thread of retards and trash posts.
the absolute state of biz this is so fucking sad.
look, swift has been conducting a poc for connecting to blockchain with link, just go check smartcon 2021 swift presentation, you lazy fucks

it's simple, soon enough linkies will be part of the elite, our chainlinkies will help all the banks around the globes interact with the blockchain, you guys have no idea how big this is. it means that banks will soon be able to do custody easily for everybody, no need to go through chinks like cz, you can just use ur bank app to manage your crypto you fucking niggers have no idea how big this is for all of crypto not just chainshit, link is about to make all of you fucking rich, instead of shitting on link you should be praising it from bringing all the normies onchain

>>54137163
kek

>>54151694
this is a good one anon James Woods is playing President Bidan in his latest role
https://twitter.com/WayneTechSPFX/status/1636295139856351233

>>54137163
>lawsuit about to conclude
>swift stroking their dick like this
the timing speaks for itself.

>>54152146
lmao @ xrp

>>54145378
youve been saying that for 6 years haha

>>54151694
Its all true, always has been. This is why the relentless fud and price suppression exists.

there's no way in hell this is gonna move the price...right?

Chainlink supporting CBDCs and carbon credits, I sold 75% I dont give a fuck about the money, LINK is a NWO coin

>>54156783
yeah right? a market worth trillions of $ about to use link as a bridge to connect it to the blockchain, is bearish as fuck... better sell all those linkies now before all that money enter crypto

>>54157252
How many link to make it

>>54157307
2017 + 6 years and you still didn't figure it out?

>>54157252
it's not going to use it though... and if link is somehow involved (they wont be), none of the value will be captured in the token. Sergey used you guys for financing and now that he has funds, you aren't needed. This is why linkies are the cuckolds of crypto

>>54135888
MEGA CHECKED

>>54140819
>>54140882
Yup, go back faggot pussy nigger.

>>54135888

Yes.

LUNC is going to be at the forefront. All others will buckle and stagger about in crab realm for years to come until they consolidate under the great baboona moona.

>>54140819
wow sprung lmao

here you go chico crypto just posted a video about it he explains it way better!
LFG!

https://youtu.be/AAfRVnUxz2I

>>54135864
Nobody buys cbdc. Get ready for fake news to drag you along and leave you holding the bag.

If cbdc's are adopted I will genuinely consider killing myself. But I dont think humans are that dumb. Dumb, sure, but not that dumb.

>>54164472
so u prefer that a shady jewish company like circle (USDC) or chinks like ifinex inc who own bitfinex (USDT) that will mint us dollar out of thin air, rather than have american central banks and european central banks issue a real digital dollar and euro? are you fucking retarded or something?
with cbdcs we wont need chinks like cz or ftx to bridge liq from web2 to web3, we can literally just use our regular bank accounts through swift

>>54151694
Why would banks want to allow you to hold shitcoins in your bank account? Also, who exactly wants to hold shitcoins in their bank account? What user is waiting for their bank account to offer shitcoin custody before he dips his toe in the crypto world?

Also, why are banks dying to interact with "THE BLOCKCHAIN"?

You're saying all of this like banks are dying to take advantage of all of these phenomenal things blockchains have to offer. The truth is, they are just doing a lot of tests to see if they can come up with some use case that helps them save some money.

Blockchains still aren't used for anything in the real world yet and that doesn't seem to be changing any time soon unless CBDCs come out...

>>54149782
This is one of the most poignant posts in this thread. A proof of concept in a sandbox environment doesn't suggest any of this stuff will do anything in the real world very soon.

>>54143628
How exactly are we the downfall of freedom? How are CBDCs going to change your life at all? What will you be prevented from doing?

>>54143796
Don't try to explain it to me as if I don't understand some trivial, pie in the sky idea of how a blockchain should work. This only works if contracts are fully collateralized for financial applications and most of the financial world doesn't work that way and it would take a long time for it to do so.

For example, you can't do credit default swaps with smart contracts effectively unless the insurance offered is fully collateralizing whatever it is underwriting. This ties up a bunch of money and I don't imagine major insurance companies want to have all of their capital sitting in escrow contracts that they're hoping have been sufficiently audited.

>26 posts ITT
>4 posts IN A ROW
>screaming into the void

>>54157307
bump

>>54164941
They can be set to expire, they can also be set to certain parameters that restrict your purchasing. Buying too many eggs? Boom you can no longer buy eggs, it's in the interest of the climate goy! You'll have a comprehensive list of all your purchases, all financial privacy will be violated. Why do you think systems of authority are pushing so hard for CBDCs? It's because they want to practice further authority on their good little subjects. So when he said it's the downfall of freedom, he's not talking shit.

>>54147798
>>54147617
>>54147779

Not even 2 more weeks. But 2 more days.

>>54140387
>There is literally no evidence that Sandro Salsano has any relationship with Chainlink or ever did.
Everyone itt are newfags

>>54156783
Kek
Please sell and post it

>>54165060
Dunning kruger the post

>>54165060
Anon, smart contracts are way simpler than this. IF X, then Y. If X conditions happens, Y event triggers. Use the blockchain post the transaction for everyone to see and verify the data that demonstrates X happens and the smart contract will trigger Y as a response.

For a quick example of financial applications, we can extend this with DECO (whenever that comes out) to offer undercollateralized loans as you can use the person's credit score and bank statement history as data sources (X condition) to prove the person will be able to make payments so they can be approved for under collateralized loans (Y event).

>>54165218
Yea…it could also not do any of that. The police could come kick my door in and rape my asshole. That doesn’t mean I don’t want a police force.

>>54165272
There is a relationship between him and SmartContract. A lot can have happened between back then and now.

>>54165272
Also, why is that everyone’s retarded response?

>damn ya’ll some real NEWFAGS!

Not everyone knows everything about Chainlink. You can contribute knowledge or you can be a faggot, no reason to always choose the latter

>>54165218
Which is why it behooves us, the future financial elite, to set up systems which work outside of and parallel to the cbdc economy. Organic farms, barter and skill share networks for example. I live in rural Australia and I can drive down the road and buy fresh eggs from an unmanned hutch at the side of the road. People will only be enslaved to the extent that they lack willpower and imagination.

>>54165272
Right? We should never discuss anything in case a newfag is reading. I hate newfags! Lol

>>54165218
bruh, freedom never existed you are always a slave of someone or something.
you cannot escape the legislation of the country you live in. if they deem crypto illegal, no matter how decentralized it is, you can neither use crypto to do legal transaction in the real world nor custody crypto. they will jail you wether you like it or not.
now the problem we have in crypto, is that crypto has become a store of value instead of a currency we can use to transact, in the end we always use fiat to buy ourselves houses and commodities. i would rather use stable coins backed by central banks than minted shitcoins out of thin air that can depeg and go to 0 at any moment. also most of the stables are owned by shady entities like bitfinex and its up to cexes to allow us or not to move our fiat into crypto and out of it.
cbdcs will kill cexes because banks will do the kob instead of jewbase or chinknance

>>54165218
Just use cash?

>>54141686
Hey guys what is ISO20022? Can anyone tell me? I’ve never heard of this before…..

>>54166005
cant tell if bait or moron

>>54141686
>>54166154
Oh weird even google knows….
OP and Linkies literally btfo. XRP “muh being sued” fudders can choke on shit and die lmao. If you’re not holding all of these tokens then you didn’t pass the IQ test. Fuck bros, it’s literally that easy. Even google knows now ffs.

>>54166200
iso20022 compliant doesnt mean they are used by banks, it's like saying my penis is pussy compliant but im an incel.

>>54135888
No it’s ISO666

>>54165742
>Which is why it behooves u
tips it

>>54166242
You literal fucking retard. Did you see my post right above it?
>>54166154
That is a screen grab from the pdf anon linked here:
>>54141686
Do you not understand how to use a Chan? How to open a pdf? Like bro what the fuck?? How goddamn stupid are you? Swift has been publishing pdfs regarding ISO20022 timeline integrations since 2021. Can you not comprehend from the linked pdf they’re actually testing it now? I swear to fuck….I try and love all frens but dude seriously?? Goddamn nigger just kill yourself if you’re that dumb or deluded..

>>54166397
fuck off incel

>>54147798
I see this anon saved my image posted over a year ago. Now you get it . Well done.

Can one of you retard kek baggy nigger incels explain to me what I am funding all this shit jesus christ this has nothing to do with what crypto is all about: rebranded doge shit
https://blog.chain.link/commit-and-prove-zks/
>bilinear maps
>group theory
>Perfect Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge for NP
Get a load of this nonsense lmao
>Suppose H is a cryptographic hash function, then we can define a simple commitment scheme as H(m; r), where H is a random oracle. To ensure hiding, randomness is necessary and must be sufficiently long and sampled freshly for each commitment. Following up on the above example, after committing the input to the input gates, we are in the following configuration. Here the prover has, for each value v, some randomness Rv and its commitment Hv=H(v; Rv).
I have been scammed out of my money five years running and all I got was another gobbledygook blogpost

>>54165689
Anon, there's a difference between ignorant and acknowledging you don't know something and being arrogant as though you're an expert in something when you clear don't know shit.

Saying "there's no evidence of Salami Salsa ever connected with Chainlink" is evidence you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

>>54166489
Sammy Salami is another actor playing a part for the reptilian elite there I said it you can send your goon squads to masturbate me to death you sick fucks

>>54166485
an inbred monstrosity trying to understand math... and then blames the scientists that they cannot dumb it down for him.
kek we live in a dystopian nightmare now when did the timeline switch

>>54151694
>going to make u rich
sure buddy

>>54166266
Indeed, gentlesir.

>>54135864
I got link cancer I need chain link to cure it
0x6E645BE8D89f59F6Fd193c315A50F375ab56B3DA

>>54166725
>17 pbti
>dumb it down
>spoon feed anon more lies
Go on spoon feed me some more lies demon if you are even capable of understanding it

>>54165659
It would be a programmable currency, it would be programmed to restrict purchases. But hey who cares right? It's only purchasing power, our primary avenue of access to anything in a consumerist society.
>>54165742
Yeah that's a very good idea. I feel people have an over reliance on supermarkets/third parties to provide their food. Personally, I have a couple acres of land where I grow vegetables and have a few cherry trees, might get some chickens soon too. Hope things get better for Aussies, given your governments predisposal to corruption and authoritarianism. Wish you all the best man.
>>54165963
I'm not much of a crypto enthusiast so I'm not entirely concerned with the future of it. However, freedom does exist and can be achieved, albeit today it's disregarded for some reason. Sure systems of authority and power have always existed but individual freedom is something that I believe is to be strived for.
>>54166005
Yes I have a big vault full of cash, like looney tunes.

>>54140819
Faggot

>>54135864
>GUYS WE ARE GOING TO LIVE IN AN AUTHORITARIAN OLIGARCHY
>THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR
you’re going to get eaten. like literally eaten. you are so unprepared for what’s coming that you will end up on someone’s bbq

>>54135864
Why doesn’t swift explicitly mention chainlink?

>>54145364
>Pink ID
>Cuq

Kek

>>54168048
they did during smartcon 2022

>>54168038
it's not going to be any different from what we have now

>>54135864
do you know what's the worst part about link?
it's the fact that even if we got a 10x right now, it would just barely make up for our underperformance
we used to be #5. a 10x would bring us to #6. we used to be 52$. a 10x would bring us to 69$, a measly +15% from our ATH
if BTC got a 10x, it would be +400% from their ATH

if any other project experienced such a thing right now, it would be a miracle. investors would be euphoric, many of them would have finally made it and everyone would be happy
if such a thing happened to link, it would slightly reverse my financial destruction and maybe reduce the dosage of anti-depressants im on right now

do you understand? even a miracle is not enough for us right now

>>54168048
because they're not using it

>>54151694
I wish but I’ll only believe when I see it

>>54169788
There is definitely a wrestling with reality that LINK is undergoing. I think something like picrel is the likely path forward for the foreseeable.

I bought LINK in late 2017. I don't care to post screenshots or wallets and end up with the regular brainlet dipshits saying I doctored the image anyway, but that is my perspective. I have certainly learned a lot, having made then rapidly lost my first million before age 30. The biggest lessons were in humility, the value of money (you do not need $5 million to sell and there are always other opportunities), and executing on instincts. Call it cope but that's how I've derived meaning out of this tough experience. I still made a lot of money, enough to change my life technically, just not enough to buy a bigger house than my boss just to demonstrate something and exit the wage cage forever. Not yet anyway.

August 2020 was more of a red flag sell signal than anything after that ever was and that's the one I kick myself over as instincts were strongest then.

I foresee myself selling LINK in the next 18 months and moving on, much like the "ride the lightning" anon. I've vented all my disappointment through silly fud by now. I'm just looking to disconnect and move on and enjoy the gains I have been fortunate enough to have.

>>54169788
In English we put the dollar sign before the numeral.

>>54169948
Stop teaching them it’s hilarious when they do this.

>>54170042
One of them took my advice and now puts the percentage sign before the numeral. Like "%50 chance" kek.
English is hard.

>>54169948
>>54170042
>oh is that a typo I see?
>he used your and you're improperly?
>"now ive got him"

>EVERYONE IS A PAID BULGARIAN SHILL ESL FAGGOT NOT SELLING I JUST BOUGHT MORE LINK. GYPSIES BTFO THANKS FOR THE PRICE UPDATE. NOT SELLING LINK IS BEING SUPPRESSED BY NEXO BULGARIANS ARE ARE TRYING TO MAKE ME SELL. -94% IS A PART OF THE PLAN. TRUST SERGEY 3D CHESS 1K EOY FUCK YOU BULGARIAN SHILLS NIGGER STINKY LINKY 1K EOY. BULGARIANS ARE MAKING FUN OF MY BAGS AGAIN MOM!! IM NOT THE ONE WHOS SEETHING, YOU ARE BULGARIANS!! I WILL NOT COPE, YOU COPE FUCKING GYPSIES, IM NOT SELLING AND I AM STAKING. IM NOT MAD YOU ARE I DIDNT NEED MONEY ANYWAY IM IN IT FOR THE TECH!

>*100 posts by this id*

>>54170062
wow, hysterical gibberish. I'll be sure to read it.

>>54170070
I don't want to tease you too much because you will be posting just like I have itt soon enough. I have no ill will towards you because I was just like you once before the market woke me up.

>>54170062
>>54170095
You don’t seem to be very relaxed judging by your messages. Maybe calm down a little there fella. It isn’t that serious buddy were just talking about our investment. Besides I don’t bother other people about theirs, even when I’m 100% it’s a scam and their being fooled.

>>54170128
Strange reply. My posts have been 2/3 easygoing non-aggressive comments and 1/3 copypastas. I doubt you actually read my posts. Generally, being all-out biased in either direction doesn't set you up for success.

>>54170042
in europe and basically the rest of the world the currency is put after the numeral.

>>54169824
you have literally the director of swift that said onstage they are working with swift to vonnect to blockchain

>>54169937
in the same position more or less. what stopped me from selling in 2020 was taxes, it wasnt feasible to me at the time that LINK would underperform eth/btc in the bullrun, but i guess you cant take anything for granted.
but the point remains, link is still the single most important project in the blockchain space with the smartest people, but the scope of the problem they are solving is so large that it might take far longer for the market to realize this unless they improve the tokenomics (lock up more of circulating supply, require payments for more services). I'm not as pessimistic as you are for the immediate future, but it sure sucks that we need a 6x just to return to previous ATH in sats. functions could be the catalyst (just as price feeds were) for the next 10x, but the main problem is that smart contracts are still so niche that the main use case is just gambling and not solving real world problems (which chainlink is trying to do). and given how fucking retarded every so called expert still is, this could drag on for a few more years.
the good news is that if you want to start building a blockchain project or start a crypto company, now is absolutely the best time to do so. bad news is that if you held link instead of diversifying into eth/btc you still have to wagecuck to make ends meet
i still cashed out around 6x my initial since 2020 so it has definately improved my life, but had we just remained at #5 I would have retired for good in 2021. however, knowing that sn=sn and all of the info gathered over the years, 1k is inevitable, and the longer the dislocation between price and value continues the more violent the correction will be

>>54170219
They hate this fact. They know it’s true but it interferes with their programming and it sends them into a wild frenzy where they spam different types of food in an attempt to derail a thread.

216 bros not like this
https://twitter.com/WayneTechSPFX/status/1636448554972577796

https://twitter.com/WayneTechSPFX/status/1636450805296275459

I'm no schizo but woah I instantly believed this as soon as I read it

>>54136102
>chainlinktoday.com

wow i'm sure we can trust that source

>>54170271
Tyvm for the human response. I don't have anywhere else to dump this kind of shit so it's a refreshing thing to get a proper share from an anon.

I fully agree with everything you said up until the sn=sn part and everything that followed. I still wish you the best of course as well as the project because like you I consider the fundamentals as legitimate as ever.

>>54143628
>Me and my /pol/ friends can certainly stop what is being planned by the global elites for decades!!!

>>54169937
What will you be holding for the next cycle? Or will you be out of crypto for now?

>>54170357
I will likely derisk a large chunk of the LINK gains, that means a mix of ETF and BTC/ETH over the next 18mos. I'm sure I'll leave some proportion to lower caos as I have a very good track record with them, LINK being just one of them.

>>54169948
in america and england, were everything you do is retarded
retard date system, retard weight system, retard accounting system, retard volume system, retard height system, retard temperature system, retard population (you). retard everything

in europe and the rest of the civilized world that's not a thing
when you say "500 dollars" sane people will naturally reflect their speech into words and symbols without inverting things for no reason whatsoever

>>54170307
you can just google it, instead of counting on an anon to spoon feed you, you lazy fuck

>>54170319
its easy to get jaded when you are seeing what the mass is not. but the information is all in the archives (sergey posting travel reviews from the same proxy that published bitcoin 0.1). Its also a very peculiar circumstance that swift just chose to work with a random startup for their key infrastructure unless there is more than meets the eye

>>54170404
You weigh kg 300

>>54170307
>chainlinktoday.com
>Funded by a Chainlink Community Grant

>>54170427
just saying that of course a website with that name is gonna shill chainlink bullshit

>>54170492
no they dont say bullshit on chainlink today but just fucking dyor u fucking dumb fuck instead of wasting my time

>>54170307
>>54170492
Here's the Strategy Director at Swift, Jonathan Ehrenfeld Solé, onstage at Smartcon 2022 talking about it. If you'd like me to stick it up your arse with an iron poker, I'd be happy to oblige, retards.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=93&v=NWxfeQA3lI4&embeds_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dswift%2Bjonathan%2Bsmartcon%26source%3Dlnms%26tbm%3Dvid%26sa%3DX%26ved%3D2ahUKEwiqk7HW4uL9AhVEFcAKHU6zCDQQ_AUoA3oECA&source_ve_path=MzY4NDIsMzY4NDIsMzY4NDI&feature=emb_logo from 1m30s

>>54170374
what's your price target?

>>54170717
Will Chainlink subsidize Swift too?

>>54135964
Lol the amount of uninformed wishful thinking in this board.

>>54136643
Good work listener anon

>>54170867
bruh i dont understand how did we end up with biz being filled with retards i mean look at the state of my thread its unbelievable, we didnt have that between 2016 and 2019 its all full of nonsense

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNCgBuI2eJc&t=73s

Secret message confirmed

>>54144787
get hyped

just sold 50 more on this pump, thanks for the exit liquidity serg

>>54169937
99.9% of LINK holders should've sold August 2020. If you bought any other crypto project you would've then 10x your money again at minimum. ETH went from $150 to $4000. LINK not only cost people $ wise, but in BTC, ETH, ADA, SOL and a gauntlet of shitcoins

That's why it's easy to dismiss Sergey as a retard. He is getting people fucked up for life

>>54170758
Yes

>>54135864
Now use the same technology to combat fraud in voting for our president. Huehuebuebjhuebue