/biz/ - Business & Finance

First for most manipulated shitcoin eber.

>>54005558
Those who live by the pump, die by the dump.

DCA, delegate, self-educate, and get involved.

>>54005558
You will get a dollar per month per every grt delegated sooner than you think yungling

>>54005532
Comfy pic. What can I expect next bull run fellow GRT bros?

>>54006055
>lunc
>matic
>21k gerts
How dies $7 total sound?

https://forum.thegraph.com/t/semiotic-labs-march-2023-update/4111

The complexity of the VI/VQ problem is mind-boggling. The more I learn about the current state of research in the area, the more ambitious I realize this really is. The entire data pipeline from block ingestion to graphql needs to be verifiable too. General purpose high-speed securely provable computation. The rest of the sector's still largely struggling to bring simpler verifiable applications and services into production, and The Graph is going all out. Absolutely wild.

Why do I need the graph?
How many do I need?
What does the graph do?

>>54008164
>Why do I need the graph?
Your favorite DeFi service probably depends on it.

>How many do I need?
It depends on what you need it for.

>What does the graph do?
Custom indexing/aggregation of data from blockchains, their smart contracts, IPFS, and ideally offchain sources in the future.

it's over edition

>>54008874
>it's over edition

Soon.

>>54006017
i thought this was just a dream by now? is 0,50 per grt delegated even close to realm of possibility?

>>54009006
We'll be lucky to see $0.003/GRT/mo post-sunset.

$1/GRT/mo requires about 13.5 trillion queries per month at current stake and estimated query pricing. The figure was predicated on the extrapolation of a multiyear historical exponential growth trend that collapsed for the first time during this bear market. Jury's out on where that kind of data demand comes from in this phase of the protocol or its market. The scope, scale, and expressiveness of The Graph's indexing isn't as broad as it could be yet, while DeFi and Web3 aren't big enough to drive that kind of demand at their present size.

>>54009198
can you take an educated guess what sort of timeframe or what it would need for grt to create $0,10 per grt delegated

>>54009448
Around 3b tokens are locked in the system. So, protocol would need to generate at least $300M in fees per month to return 10c per single grt. Annual $3.6b revenue does not sound unreasonable to me. The only w is if tegan and the crew have that grit in them or will they drop the project once they feel comfy enough

>>54009633
Thanks anon. Nice to see some real discussion in grt threads

>>54009633
Wow, that seems reasonably doable. So you are saying that my 100k stack will make me 10 grand a month?!?!

>>54009448
Couldn't say. Its utilization is closely tied to crypto's outlook, which is at the mercy of macro, which is signaling an impending disaster. Impossible to forecast long-term because most all the usual assumed constants are in utter flux, difficult to even parameterize.

If you want a crude and subjective estimate, it really depends on where you think DeFi and Web3 will be in 2025, 2027, 2030. Query volume growth ought to be at least proportional to their growth, maybe with some multiplier derived from a function I can't deduce right now. For instance, query volume is down about 33% from ATH while non-BTC crypto's market capitalization is down like 69.5%. So The Graph has some residual utility rates independent of aggregate asset valuations, probably even independent of trading volume, which is good - shows the staying power of both DeFi and GRT's "needed" status. Need more realtime data on ongoing contract txn activity, might be able to establish a loose correlation func between that and QV on supported networks. Messari's standardization work is a start, but not enough, plus it's a lot of data to crunch with such tiny query size limits imposed by the protocol in the grand scheme of things.

Sorry for incoherence, dealing with brain fog tonight.

>>54010069
TLDR it's over

I have 10k to spend ive been looking GRT for some time now. Is 10c€ a good entry? I could get a 100k bag now

>>54011442
Can you afford for your $10,000 to be worth zero in 9 months time?

>>54008144
>rocket emoji
that is so fucking stupid and unprofessional, and i expected better. when will cryptoniggers realize that posting dumb emojis only makes them look like scammers and fools
i'm tired of this idiocy

whats the url for delegating and who do i delegate with?

Ths coin is scam token. Tokenomic is very very horrib. Sirs my piec of advise is donot buy this one

>>54012030
It's just an emoji anon. Moonboys use it within the context of price speculation, developers use it within the context of development milestones, it is what it is.

>>54011351
Yes. Crypto failed to free us from the excesses of central banks and tech corporations. UTXO delayed the evolution of this ecosystem by over six years. All dystopia from here.

>>54013851
https://thegraph.com/explorer/participants/indexers?chain=mainnet

Pick an indexer, click delegate. Not sure which one, resources for comparative analysis of indexer performance is lacking right now, so you'll need to do some diligence.

>>54011919
If GRT is worth zero in nine months, I'll buy the entire supply and delegate it to earn post-sunset query fees and retire. It's over.

>>54014200
gm

>>54013851
https://graphtronauts.com/#/indexers
good resource