/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53935644
Checked. Once ari turns the suppression bot off we are going to 1 thousand United States dollars per link

>>53935644
Checked
Reminder that citi analysts have said that Link will possibly eclipse Bitcoin

>>53935690
Didn't they say that about litecoin too?

>ctrl-f Chainlink

>>53935644
>What inspired some of these experiments were some of our clients coming to us and saying we want to be able to access some of these new tokenized asset platforms, but equally for us as an established player having to integrate with them all individually is quite inefficient and because they are relatively new we don’t know which ones are going to be the ones which will predominate. So there is an opportunity cost issue there so actually what those participants came to us to say was can you Swift act as a single window to those platforms as we access you today for traditional securities

>>53935703
Couldn’t find anything on that.

>>53935644
Swifts adoption of chainlink wouldn't even effect the price to a point anyone would care even if they fully adopted it as a standard. Also, ISO20022 has nothing to do with chainlink, it's just a messaging standard. The tech is cool, but the price of a cup of coffee meme isn't a meme. It is literally designed to be a low price no matter how many link tokens are in circulation so node providers can hedge against risk of staking them. The Chainlink whitepaper reads like what Do Knon wanted to do with Terra Luna, its cool tech but the token is never going to some insane 3 figure price. I do think it can hit its ATH with all the misguided hype, so call me a fudder all you want but I am not advocating you to sell, just be realistic.

>>53935644
>>53935662
>>53935690
>>53935703
>>53935709
>>53935746
>>53935780
>>53935860

XRP Ripple

>>53935780
Maybe I was wrong?

>>53935860
I will apply my nose directly to her anime butthole

>>53935866
>XRP Ripple

Explain how ripple enables cross chain communication as a DLT itself?

The XRP schitzo swift connections were always about cross border payments, not bridging between offchain/on chain or between chains

>>53935866
xlm is the exact same thing as xrp except without a million apes on it

https://twitter.com/swiftcommunity/status/1630391863101276162?s=46&t=eX-mM9WZEg54VxtmgTs0dw

>>53935906
https://ir.citi.com/_tpHpW8MfaZ1QXwGmP1JGMGXXI95qXm3IMJzUJScLMb6XIjtOls6EbDehXMR3B_o9Opi7mdc5tQ%3D

I just went through the report and pic related is the only mention of LTC

>>53935690
Behold, the future of stinkers! Never going back up again

>>53936229
>1 to 10 stock split

>>53935860
But anon, t-they’re gonna capture so much value. The swift network is worth a bussin 500 million, Link might just qualify as a micro cap!

>>53936250
>what is adjusted historical pricing

The irony is that Link would succeed even without Swift, however we're getting that as well. We're getting the entire cake, and new cakes that haven't even been made yet, and cakes that our children will make when the grow up.
In short, we're getting a lot of cake, and anyone who hasn't got a bag of Link will find themselves cakeless at the end of a rope.

>>53935860
Call me a community advocate all you want but if Chainlink is fully adopted by Swift then high 3 digits is FUD

>>53936265
oh yeah? and you're gay

>>53936325
based. im ready

>>53936325
>The irony is that Link would succeed even without Swift
Swift is the key to actual adoption of crypto in the real world. Sure link would succeed without them but it would take a lot longer. Swift integrating CCIP would be the first instance of a finacial institution officially adopting crypto and not just testing/experimenting/researching it. This is what everyone has been waiting for, from mEthheads to xrpniggers to btcmaxis. It would be remembered as the single most important event in crypto history (besides btc creation).

>>53936612
>Swift integrating CCIP would be the first instance of a finacial institution officially adopting crypto and not just testing/experimenting/researching it.
What would happen to the price when this does happen?

Wtf is that thing from swift. You'll never be a real man.

>>53936229
>3pbti

>>53936636
>-2.5%

>>53936338
I would call you to tell you to take some profits

>>53935644
LOVING sergey's new hair

https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/tokenised-assets-interoperability-5-key-takeaways-our-ground-breaking-experiments

I'm putting together an app using functions that detects whenever i wipe my ass, counting how many squares of tissue i use and ordering for me direct from amazon in real time. when an order is despatched it plays 'Rock Around the Clock' through my hi-fi, bills me $245 in BCH and shares my location with everyone in my contact list. Previously this would have been impossible.

>>53936957

>>53935917
hooks. Thats what does it on the XRPL. There was a theory that flare would be the connection layer for XRP, and it still might although they have really stumbled with their launch and even david is mad at the way they did things. So well see which of the 2 it is, but im thinking itll probably be hooks.

>>53935917
>>53937056
https://xrpl-hooks.readme.io/docs
here is a good read on what hooks provide the XRPL. Youll see that the documentation for this and the XRPL mirrors everything that the financial institutes talk about when discussing DLT, and adopting blockchain, they describe the XRPL literally word for word in most instances.

>>53937012
LINK IS A COMMON VERB USED ALL THE TIME IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERCONNECTED SYSTEMS

>>53935644
incredibly bullish for XRP

>>53936636
>+2.5%

>>53937078
Damn right. WAGMI.

This has more to do with Ripple, Hedera, and Quant than Chainlink. Bullish for XRP, HBAR, and QNT.

>>53937012
>>53937078
>linking
>link ing
>link = 4 ing = 3
>link confirmed $43 EOM
the absolute state of linkies.

>>53935644
Tokenized assets? Is this an ICP thread?

>>53935644
checkers

>NICK KERigan

>>53937088
why does XRP tokenize human blood? you know the only means of finality elites accept

>>53936636
-2%

>>53935644
thats a man

>>53937409
That’s a thumb, but he is going to make us rich

>>53935703
No

>>53936957
Watch the video, link is powering the whole swift backend and it’s launching soon

>>53939929
Jesus Christ shed a tear because of these lies. Find Jesus anon and stop lying
truth>trust

>>53939929
kek no it isn't, swift only will interact with ccip. something like that is 5-6 years off

Don't fall for the psyops

Chainlink is very bad token,, only XRP is chosen coin for money settlement

XRP very good coin ., many moonie moons coming for bullish news just got big bag of XRP

wow incredible bullish for xrp SWIFT confirm for xrp ledger for back end crypto project

>>53935866

kek, pic related. xrp fags dont know when to give up. there was even a time when they started saying"swift doesnt matter" when LINK was taking all the swift real estate

ignore paid fud 4channel., xrp is win this token battle

>>53940142
>kek no it isn't, swift only will interact with ccip. something like that is 5-6 years off

It’s not far off it’s launching this year. Your 5-6 year timeframe is when CCIP will eventually eat all of swifts legacy messaging services and swift is left as a managed services provider for banks around CCIP and DLT technologies

Blockchain

>>53935917
Flare, actually

>>53937096
XRP
>shit
HBAR
>shit
QNT
>shit
LINK
>shit.
Buy food, cat, and dog tokens instead.

>>53935948
xlm is for retail cross border payments/remittances, that's why they bought moneygram

>>53936644
look at these fucking retards, this is who runs our world.

>>53936957
btw when you see institutions like Swift saying "interoperability" they mean "Quant Overledger"
just saying

>>53937056
hooks is light embedded smart contracts. the cost of embedding them means that they'll never be able to run complicated constant smart contracts like derivatives. flare and XDC and maybe Algo will be used for programmatic money/derivatives stuff.

>>53937096
i haven't thought too much about the way Hedera's stack plays into this. i thought they were more about data management, less payments. any links i could read up on about this?

>>53940645
KEK I love cripples bro. they're so schitzophrenic

>>53940645
individually hooks are very small and light. However, you are able to combine them to create complicated instructions.
>the cost of embedding them
no idea what you mean by this but if youre talking about an actual dollar cost, everything on the XRPL is dirt cheap to do, so any price will be negligible, remember too, using a smart contact on any EVM chain has a high price currently. Take a look at this
https://dev.to/wietse/hooked-3-tech-preview-release-play-with-smart-contracts-on-the-xrp-ledger-2076
Basically, there is going to be a giant library of hooks that you will be able to chain together, think legos, to create whatever it is you want. Itll open the doors for regular users to be able to "program" their own wallets into things that resemble smart contracts (think account abstraction similar to what FTM is doing). When hooks arrive its going to open a ton of doors for defi as every day users will have similar powers as people who can code (at least on the XRPL)

>>53940673
I know, Swift has publicly stated multiple times they are working with Chainlink for interoperability yet XRP schitzos still think XRP is involved

>>53940763
Xrp chain literally crashed from its shitcoin fiesta in 2021 no shot it can handle smart contracts

>>53940206
and THAT is when the token would be worth something. CCIP will have the material effect of staking, that is, none at all

>>53941292
First, hooks are not smart contacts, they are a database of simple codes that can be strung together to enact a more complicated task. I.e. WHEN a txn over X $ amount comes in AND it comes from YY wallet do XYZ (simple example buy the link I gave gives you the list of commands that can be used). Its smart contract functionality, not smart contracts. Second, the XRPL has 100% uptime since its inception, its one of the things that makes the XRPL unique. Its no secret that ripple built the XRPL with banks in mind, they wanted bank adoption from the outset, anything less than 100% uptime is not sufficient for banks.

>>53942463
You guys should really look into hooks and what they offer. Its such a crazy offering to bring to the table. If you ever played WOW, or some other MMO, think macros. Thats the best comparison that I can think of. Instead of the code being written (and that being the smart contact). Hooks will be simple commands that then call up the code from the background to be used.

>>53940635

>chainlink
>we are here today with the head of Swift to announce a Poc with our interoperability protocol

>quant niggers
>only interaction with SWIFT ever was paying to attend sibos and interviewing themselves there

>....

>Swift mean Quant when they mention interoperability

Bullish for XRP

>>53942673
Laugh all you want at the delusional cripplets and quantlets, at least they have the right mindset financially.
Their coins pump at the slightest bit of positivity.

The clock struck midnight and a chill wind blew through the dingy back room of the seedy casino. The degenerate gambler, known around town only as The Rabbit had been spending his last few pennies on poker chips and roulette wheels. But tonight, he had stumbled upon something far more valuable - a mysterious token, shaped like a red rabbit. He quickly realized that this was no ordinary object - it had the potential to increase its value 100 times over in a matter of days, if he played his cards right. With a maniacal grin and a gleam in his eye, The Rabbit tucked the token away and headed out into the night, determined to make a fortune before anyone else caught wind of his lucky discovery. Little did he know that 4chan was already abuzz with whispers of the Red Rabbit and its magical powers.

>>53935644
>>53935662
>>53935690
>>53935703
>>53935709
>>53935746
>>53935780
>>53935860
>>53935866
>>53935906
>>53935909
>>53935917
>>53935948
>>53936087
>>53936138
>>53936146
>>53936229
>>53936250
>>53936255
>>53936265
>>53936325
>>53936338
>>53936343
>>53936474
>>53936612
>>53936636
>>53936644
>>53936694
>>53936844
>>53936857
>>53936947
>>53936957
>>53936973
>>53937012
>>53937056
>>53937075
>>53937078
>>53937088
>>53937089
>>53937094
>>53937096
>>53937100
>>53937120
>>53937123
>>53937137
>>53937369
>>53937409
>>53938202
>>53938233
>>53939929
>>53939968
>>53940142
>>53940150
>>53940157
>>53940177
>>53940185
>>53940198
>>53940206
>>53940601
>>53940615
>>53940616
>>53940622
>>53940635
>>53940645
>>53940673
>>53940763
>>53941004
>>53941292
>>53941507
>>53942463
>>53942495
>>53942673
>>53942717
>>53942942
where can i buy this swsift coin? i cannot find coin marketcap

>>53935644

Indian in top management, scam inbound.

>>53937012
>>53940150
>>53940157
>>53940177
>>53940198
The absolute state of curryfudders

>>53935860
This fud is pretty good, but you conveniently left out how the token supply is fixed relative to the collateral required to insure derivatives smart contracts, insurance smart contracts, etc.

>>53935644
why do xoomers stay invested when they know the lead dev is CHIRDEEP

>>53943156
good one, ranjesh

>>53937409
Nick_ker

>>53943156
I don't think you really want to invest in SWIFT (ticker: LINK) anon