/biz/ - Business & Finance

https://www.vdigitalassetbroker.com/#ecosystem?s=true

I was only 69 years old. I loved The Dev so much, I downloaded all the videos and memes. I'd pray to The Dev every night before I go to bed, thanking for the honor I've been given. "The Dev is love", I would say, "The Dev is life". My mom’s boyfriend hears me and calls me a neet. I knew he was just jealous for my devotion of The Dev. I called him a nocoiner. He slaps me and sends me to go to sleep. I'm crying now and my face hurts. I lay in bed and it's really cold. A warmth is moving towards me. I feel something touch me. It's The Dev. I'm so happy. He whispers in my ear, "Think Bigger". He grabs me with his powerful dev hands, and puts me on my hands and knees. I open my metamask wallet for The Dev. He inputs the DBI contract and tells me to sell my Chainlink (TICKER: LINK). It hurts so much, but I do it for The Dev. I can see the green line go up as my eyes start to water. I push the button and sell the rest of my link from other wallets. I want to please The Dev. He roars a mighty roar, as he fills my portfolio with his love. My mom’s boyfriend walks in. The Dev looks him straight in the eye, and says, "The Dev Keeps Deving". The Dev leaves through my window. The Dev is love. The Dev is life.

>>53878866
>>53878844
>dumps
You’re a fucking retard you know that?

>>53878813
years ago when i sold at $40

>>53878813
kek

>>53878866
>>53878885
Seething brownoid

>>53878813
Staking release being a nothingburger. That was the exact moment I finally conceded that I’ll be holding these bags for life.
It’s sad the only people left who believe in link are like 150 terminally online losers rotating between Twitter and /biz/. I bought right before mainnet and got a lot for a few thousand bucks so I’ll never actually lose much money but this was supposed to take us to $500 last bullrun and I can’t even remember the last time we were above $10.
I truly enjoy the suffering of smug cocky people though so I’m gonna stick around until the next bullrun ends and witness the actual suicides of these faggots once link underperforms again. No one can make it 8 years with zero gains not even the most devout link schizo. It’ll be the one of the most satisfying moments in my life, with the first being a bunch of cunts in the tinnitus forums bullying me and making fun of me for being skeptical of a (((promising))) new treatment and then watching their reactions in real time as the company announced the treatment was a failure and they were shutting their doors and pivoting to a totally unrelated treatment. Hands down the most incredible internet moment of my life.

For what it’s worth I have accumulated some ETH/BTC/QNT/BNB and some low cap shitcoins. I’ll probably make a bit of money next run then I’m gone forever but first the faggots who shilled me chainlink will rope.

>>53881514
You were watching Magic Mike's Last Dance while Bigfoot killed all your chickens, and now you want money to buy more chickens?

>>53878813
For me was aug 2020 when I sold for eth

>>53878813
If you think Chainlink has trouble releasing things, you should definitely check out ETH, ADA, etc.

>>53881514
Same, it’s clear the team just is not up to the task. This form of staking just airdrops some link printed out of thin air and it took them YEARS to finish. Combined that with the bizarre marketing, promoting scams, CL labs employees playing videogames etc. It’s just tiring. However at this point there’s not much we can do since it’s a bear market. But I am definitely moving out of link next bull. Probably keep some link staked and selling the rest for eth/btc and some low cap shitcoins. It’s funny how the only people left who are bullish in link are maybe a dozen people on biz who also post on twitter.

When I realised there's always a general for GME and LUNA but never for link

>>53878813
>>53878903
>>53881291
>>53881514
>>53881585
>>53881640
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE
Jesus christ.

>>53878813
You are literally spending your time on this website to make sure that others don't buy one specific token. What are your motives?

>>53881661
Case in point. Gonna screenshot this and post it eoy 2025 to fucking annihilate these newfags. This smug nigger unironically has under 10K LINK I would bet my life on it

>>53881876
Seems like the pasta is 100% correct and this makes you 100% percent assmad lmao.

>>53881876
>Gonna screenshot this
Here's a screenshot for you

>>53878813
2021 for me too, OP, when I realised how retarded the commentary around it was.

>>53882004
You guys have a 5.5 year long history of posting such "breadcrumbs" and you've to date underperformed the market for the majority of that time. I admit in some depressing sense I find it admirable how loyal you idiots are.

>>53882080
>breadcrumbs
This isn't a breadcrumb.

>>53882095
>partnerships

>>53882122
This is from Vodafone's website, anon

>>53882139
here's another crumb from Oracle themselves anon
it's nothing

>>53882153
They'll bend the knee one day. Everyone does.

>>53882158
>soon™

>>53882153
That's a slide from a presentation by one company about a possible future event. That's a breadcrumb.

This >>53882004
is a website about a product that is in production, with half a dozen massive institutions involved.

>>53882163
Why does link obviously upset you so much?
Is >>53881661 completely spot on? Did you buy the top or lose everything on lending platforms? I couldnt even begin to imagine posting this much about a crypto I dont hold

>>53882176
>That's a slide from a presentation by one company about a possible future event. That's a breadcrumb.
oracle for startups officially "partnered" with chainlink in 2019, exactly how "vodafone digital broker" did just now.
>>53882179
why does pointing out the fact that this is literally another meaningless partnership make you all seethe with rage?

>>53882230
>why does pointing out the fact that this is literally another meaningless partnership make you all seethe with rage?
We're all a little concerned for you, honestly, at this point. It's really weird. You'd see that if you weren't all aspergersy.

>>53882245
what's even weirder is you deflecting so hard. It's yet another "partnership" with a meaningless subsidiary (Digital Asset Broker by Vodafone) of a much bigger and established enterprise (Vodafone), how and why is this a big deal? Is it because of R3 or IBM? we've already established connections with these entities years ago.
it's nothing but a desperate attempt to ramp up hype for March.
now you may proceed bombarding me with strawmans and ad homs lol

>>53882095
>>53882139
Call it whatever you like then. The point is these have a now long-established history of accomplishing exactly zero on price.

>>53882262
I didn't read your post, friend. Seek help.

>>53882262
Presenting this kind of thing is one thing. Fine, you think you're onto something. Vehemently insisting this is evidence of impending price explosion then persistently defending that is simply suspicious and weird. Price action is supposed to do all the talking yet LINK trades barely above 2019 levels.

>>53882271
you're not my friend if you're consciously trying to hype up nothinburgers and demoralize holders, setting them up for yet another disappointment, you're a kike. Unless this "partnership" leads to immediate results, preferably on price, it is nothing.

>>53882230
>oracle for startups
Right. An outright startup program.

This is an actual product, with half a dozen massive multinationals and institutions involved instead of startups.

>>53882270
Wait for the official confirmation announcement, and then watch what Bitcoin does.

>>53882262
>It's yet another "partnership" with a meaningless subsidiary
It's Vodafone, Mastercard, IBM, Tata, and R3.

Cope, seethe, and dial8

>>53882271
Kek, how predictable. Nothing to contribute but hot fucking air per usual yet aggressively insisting something that never happens will happen. You wouldn't even be posting here if LINK actually followed through on your mystery fantasies.

>>53882285
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bsn-integrates-chainlink-oracles-bringing-real-world-data-into-its-irita-powered-network-301081572.html
https://interwork.org/interwork-alliance-launches-to-standardize-token-powered-ecosystems-worldwide/
>The new organization already has 36 members, including tech firms such as Accenture, IBM, and Microsoft; banking and exchange firms ING, Nasdaq, SDX, and UBS; and, blockchain companies Digital Asset, Neo Global Development, Hedera Hashgraph and R3.
explain in detail how this is a bigger deal than China's BSN or Interwork Alliance.
I'll wait

>>53882230
>accuses me of seething with rage to deflect
>still cant answer the simple question of why hes obsessed with link and it upsets him
Your spiels mean absolutely nothing to me until you can explain why youve spent hundreds of hours of your life trying to angrily gaslight on biz in regards to a token that is allegedly unimportant

>>53882285
Your schizo tier excuses for total lack of price performance and insistence on an increasingly broken-from-reality rapture fantasy is literally meaningless to anyone other than you and your ego.

>>53882297
What else would make a crypto pump, if not massive institutional adoption for real-world use cases?

>>53882296
>obsessed
>hundreds of hours
I'm on post #7 but I can see how you think people are "obsessed" with you when you constantly deflect each and every argument and resort to ad homs and personal attacks
it ain't working buddy, all of my posts are logical and coherent, the only people sperging and seething are the army of chainlink cheerleaders shutting down any critical discussion whatsoever

>>53882302
>What else would make a crypto pump, if not massive institutional adoption for real-world use cases?
>link dumps
thanks for conceding that this is a nothinburger

>>53882310
Hey, it's a silent website launch, nobody knows about this yet.

>>53882312
>soon™
you forgot to address this>>53882295
how many years do we have to wait for BSN and InterWork Alliance impacting the price?

>>53882295
>BSN
>InterWorkAlliance

Yeah, about those

>>53882303
>price bad!
>adoption bad!
>critical discussion

>>53882302
Again, heard it all before. You lot are always here shilling this kind of bullshit yet it never ever materialises.

>>53882317
This is really messing with your mental stability, isn't it?

>>53882323
>you are shilling
>it never ever materialises
Anon, this is Vodafone's website.

>>53882318
oh so unless a token pumps the moment the "institutional adoption" is announced, it is doomed.
so this is the power of "real world adoption"
>>53882322
>questioning the gravity of the "partnership" judging from the team's track record is not critical discussion
I don't agree with that, and notice how nobody is able to address the criticism properly, lol
>>53882328
how is this vodafone subsidiary partnership a bigger deal than InterWork Alliance or BSN?
still waiting

>>53882278
>>53882283
>>53882287
Seek help. You can get past this.

>>53882303
>im on post #7
In this thread
Which youve spent an hour in now
Reposting the same memes you use in other threads
Still squirming and feeling personally attacked when people ask why you spend so much time
You're unbelievably shit at this lmao

>>53882330
>how is this vodafone subsidiary partnership a bigger deal than InterWork Alliance or BSN?
InterWorkAlliance and BSN were big deals as well.
Which is why pic related happened.

>>53882328
>>53882334
>$7

>>53882341
Hardly anyone knows about this, and the ones that do know are waiting for some kind of confirmation.

>>53882334
>not reading
>not bothering
>still responding with condescending passive aggressive insults
>>53882337
then why haven't we heard anything else from them? why are we getting radio silence for almost 3 years? does anyone know what are the latest developments since then? what about the korean banks here?https://cointelegraph.com/news/chainlink-brings-fx-rates-data-from-top-korean-banks-to-defi
everybody seems to have memory holed all of it and now we're supposed to get excited from "watered down" partnerships with lesser entities. what about Digital asset guys? anybody remember the countless breadcrumbs about them and Blythe?

>>53882357
If you think nothing will ever happen anyway, then why are you even here?

This is Vodafone+Mastercard+Tata+IBM+R3; cope and seethe in the corner.

>>53882336
>ignores the criticism and proceeds to unleash a rampage of personal attacks
>heh, you "feel" personally attacked when I'm personally attacking you rolf
kek, actual mental illness. don't bother to respond unless you address my points
>>53882365
>it ain't about the "partnership" itself bro, it's all about hope!
what?

>>53882354
You're a retard but you'll learn eventually, like all the other smitten, generally well-intending linkies.

>>53882368
>>it ain't about the "partnership" itself bro
But it is.

>>53882371
This is Vodafone+Mastercard+Tata+IBM+R3; cope and seethe in the corner.

>>53882330
>notice how nobody is able to address the criticism properly, lol
But what criticism? Yesterday it was: "nobody is addressing the bad price action!", which is just not true. Everybody is addressing it, but what is there to discuss? What possibly do you expect anons to say when you point out: these partnerships are not translating into positive price action? It's a futile exercise and you act like you pointed out something so fundamentally profound that other anons are at a loss for words. The truth of the matter is that we don't know, price will probably crab/dump for a while longer until it doesn't, after which the other side will become smug again.

>>53882376
ok and this is 36 members + Accenture +IBM + Microsoft +ING+Nasdaq+SDX+ UBS +blockchain + Digital Asset+Neo Global Development + R3 + Google + Oracle + the 4 biggest Korean banks + chinese government + WEF
and literally NOTHING
HAPPENED

>>53882386
>ok and this is 36 members
What is?

>>53882386
>and literally NOTHING
>HAPPENED
Also, something did happen: Bitcoin dumped

>>53882376
Anon, there is literally nothing for me to cope and seethe about. Price is exactly the same. You are the one supposing all these things will transpire, as did the long history of linkies who came before you hyping whatever their latest hopium was that was totally going to be THE thing.
>anon, this is Deutsche Telekom
>anon, this is Associated Press
>anon, this is the literal former Google CEO
You have this completely backwards and it's hilarious. You're the one coping, coping with a $7 LINK price in 2023. Absolutely no LINK bull with your temperament in 2017-2019 would have expected nor been content with this. Predicting something is one thing. Vehemently insisting it will 100% undeniably result in an exploding price, trust me, you'll see, YOU'LL SEE!!! is another.

You have a cycle of denial of reality and copium. You're obviously beyond help so I don't know why I bother but the market will eventually make you learn.

>>53882380
>what criticism
why are you forcing me to repeat myself?
why is this a bigger deal than every other "partnership" we've had throughout the years because to me it looks like a giant nothinburger, and the absence of price action supports this obviously.
it's a fairly simple question
>>53882388
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bsn-integrates-chainlink-oracles-bringing-real-world-data-into-its-irita-powered-network-301081572.html
https://interwork.org/interwork-alliance-launches-to-standardize-token-powered-ecosystems-worldwide/
https://cointelegraph.com/news/chainlink-brings-fx-rates-data-from-top-korean-banks-to-defi
>>53882406
so again, if they fail to pump in the very same day that means it failed? it's been 3 years since then, radio silence, no new developments, nobody has heard anything about IWA or BSN or Korean Banks or any of this shit
at this point this has nothing to do with BTC suppressing link, that wouldn't stop these entities from utilizing the network
something is terribly wrong here and you people constantly refuse to address the elephant in the room with ridiculous mental gymnastics

>>53882416
>still no explanation as to why he spends so much time trying to gaslight and concern troll

>>53882434
>still no argument as to why this is actually not a nothinburger apart from "soon" and "trust the plan"
is your strategy to exhaust your opponent with endless ad homs?

>>53882434
Oh, because I'm a paid Bulgarian tranny.

So tell me why do others "spend so much time" brainlessly shilling nonsense? Could it be they have their own personal motivations? Idiots like you are such a waste of time and honestly all that's left of the once great LINK "community" of 2018.

>>53882446
>>53882447
>still no explanation as to why he spends so much time trying to gaslight and concern troll

>>53882460
>I'll exhaust him with ad homs that'll work!
why is this a bigger deal than BSN backed up by the chinese government anon? or IWA, which includes IBM, R3 and 30+ entities collaborating together?
>inb4 ad homs

I just bought 200 Link!

>>53882357
https://archived.moe/biz/search/filename/1669824676433581.jpg/
Kys loser

>>53882417
>it's a fairly simple question
It's a moot question. Why does the partnership have to be bigger than other partnerships to be meaningful? Why are demoralized linkies and noLinkers alike trying to spin an objective positive (new partnership) into a negative? Baffling.

>>53882470
>*still* no explanation as to why he spends so much time trying to gaslight and concern troll

>>53882532
He does this all the time. See >>53882507
He spends his entire day in link threads while pretending he doesn’t. I couldn’t imagine living a life that sad

>>53882416
>You are the one supposing all these things will transpire
You're acting like I'm imagining this Vodafone thing lmao

You have mental problems.

>>53882417
>if they fail to pump in the very same day that means it failed?
What?

>it's been 3 years since then, radio silence, no new developments, nobody has heard anything about IWA or BSN or Korean Banks or any of this shit
Enterprise Ethereum Alliance is 6 years ago, what happened to that?

>>53882578
You're backpedalling now as the projection intensifies. The point is your insistence this one, this time, is definitely "the thing" lacks enough awareness to be comical. Shills like you hype up this kind of shit time and time again as LINK flounders against the market. You're operating in unreality.

>>53882606
>You're backpedalling now
How?

>>53878813
A LOOOONG as time ago, that's why I invest in micro caps...some people call 'em "shit coins" but I think I found a secret one before anyone else...h[o]p r[a]bb[i]t

>>53882609
By suggesting the conversation is about whether or not "this Vodafone thing" is real or not as opposed to the impossible motivations behind insisting this will definitely pump price above all of the other shit exactly like it which people like you have littered biz threads about for years while LINK performed woefully over sustained periods of time.

>>53882625
>releasing a real-world product with Vodafone, Mastercard, IBM, Tata, and R3
>"this is not pumpworthy"

Like I said, you have some kind of mental condition.

>>53882646
Maybe it is "pumpworthy", anon. Have any of the other "pumpworthy" pieces of "news" identified itt resulted in anything other than sustained underperformance? That's the point. You are insisting this will be the one to buck the trend of a graveyard of hopium just like this. It's your own baseless bias, that's all. Until price lets you rub my face in it, I will continue to rub yours instead.

>>53882670
>Have any of the other "pumpworthy" pieces of "news" identified itt resulted in anything other than sustained underperformance?
No, because Bitcoin dumped in virtually all cases.

>>53882674
Which can of course be boiled down to "blah blah blah". Put up or shut up. Your focus on what you think "should be" instead of what actually is is just your marriage to your bags.

>>53882670
>*still* no explanation as to why he spends so much time trying to gaslight and concern troll

>>53882689
>Which can of course be boiled down to "blah blah blah"
Well no, it obviously cannot.

>>53882690
pic related
>>53882689
15 posts by this eternally assblasted fudcuck now lmao

>>53882693
Well, yes it can, if you're playing the game of trying to make money as opposed to ego fluffing.

>>53882704
Jfl at the thought the guy pointing out you're at $7 in 2023 is "assblasted" as opposed to the clowns holding a brick lemon as an asset, falling off a near 3 year cliff. Whatever you want to tell yourself, anon...

>>53882693
After a certain period of time, your predictions need to materialise. Otherwise they remain delusions, increasingly divorced from reality. That's how it works.

>>53882726
>yes it can, if you're playing the game of trying to make money
When Bitcoin dumps, it immediately takes all of crypto down with it.

>>53882726
>**still** no explanation as to why he spends so much time trying to gaslight and concern troll

>>53882737
This is your excuse for a losing strategy spanning nearly 3 years.

>>53882736
>After a certain period of time, your predictions need to materialise.
Predictions?
This is from Vodafone's own website.

>>53882746
>a losing strategy
lol I guess dumping Bitcoin whenever Link does something is someone's "strategy", yeah

>>53882755
There you go backpedalling again. Making the conversation about "is this real or not" as opposed to whether or not your assuredness about price explosion is valid or not.

You can make up whatever excuses you like for backing a loser, anon, but blindly clinging to one while crying foul makes you one too.

Put up or shut up.

>>53882726
So why exactly are you obsessed with "the clowns holding a brick lemon as an asset, falling off a near 3 year cliff" again?
Why do you find answering >>53882690 impossible? Does anyone pay you to do this or do you do it for free? >>53881661

>>53882780
I posted a screenshot of a Vodafone+Mastercard+Tata+IBM+R3 real-world usage project.
You instantly started seething.

That is all.

>>53882578
>Enterprise Ethereum Alliance
https://entethalliance.org/news/
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/siemens-digital-bond-blockchain/
now your turn

>>53882801
Why do you spend so much time doing this?

>>53882812
what makes this partnership more meaningful than BSN, IWA, Korean Banks etc?

>>53882801
>https://entethalliance.org/news/
nothing there

https://www.ledgerinsights.com/siemens-digital-bond-blockchain/
This is Polygon (Matic), not Ethereum.
Oops

>>53882818
Why do you dodge the question every time?

>>53882821
https://entethalliance.org/member-directory/
https://entethalliance.org/ey-joins-the-enterprise-ethereum-alliance-board-to-advance-ethereum-business-readiness/
>Sept 2022
>nothing there
it is something compared to IWA
https://interwork.org/news/
oops, literally absolutely nothing
>>53882835
I've asked first, why do you continuously avoid the argument and switch to ad homs?

>>53882796
Right. Retcon the entire conversation we've had. Enjoy your hopium huffing, anon. Just remember it's all for naught until LINK actually converts it into price appreciation and your excuses are not objective, and are meaningless to anyone actually trying to make returns.

>>53882818
>it hasn't happened yet, that means it will never happen
This specific cope is just so incredibly hilarious.

We're talking about transforming business and finance as we know it, it's not going to happen just like that.
But guess what, when it does happen it WILL require oracles.

>>53882818
>>53882841
>>53882842
see
>>53882790

>>53882842
>Retcon the entire conversation we've had
That's literally how this "conversation" began

>>53882004
>>53882080

>>53882841
I just entered the thread.I don’t care about your petty argument, I’m interested in why you spend so much time doing this.
>>53882507

>>53882845
>if it hasn't happened yet, it will
???
>>53882850
see>>53882417

>>53882860
>I don’t care about your petty argument
then I won't bother engaging with you and your inquiries, have a nice day

>>53882861
see
>>53882850

>>53882861
>>if it hasn't happened yet, it will
>???
There's a good chance of that, yes.

>>53882842
When your parents ask you with a dejected tone whether you're going to get a job this year, or perhaps even go outside, make some friends, maybe by some miracle give them a grandchild, what do you think they would say if you told them you spend 95% of your waking hours fudding Chainlink? hahahaha

>>53882867
>>53882863
So why exactly are you obsessed with "the clowns holding a brick lemon as an asset, falling off a near 3 year cliff" again?
Why do you find answering >>53882690 impossible? Does anyone pay you to do this or do you do it for free? >>53881661

>>53882863
Lmao what a shocker, he can’t answer the question after he was caught posting the same image in other threads that he spent all day in with 50+pbtid

>>53882864
see>>53882417
we can do this all day, bro
>>53882866
there's also a good change it won't, especially considering the track record of every "partnership" link has had so far
let me change the question a bit. can you name a single partnership or integration which led to anything tangible in 5 years?
>>53882878
link my posts to other threads and the same image?

>>53882883
>there's also a good change it won't
Hey that's great.
So why are you here again?

>>53882867
>>53882842
I'm not just memeing with the 'get help' shit by the way. I really think you need to get help. This isn't a normal existence. You owe it to yourself to do more with your life. This is extremely unhealthy. You CAN do better.

>>53882883
see
>>53882874
>So why exactly are you obsessed with "the clowns holding a brick lemon as an asset, falling off a near 3 year cliff" again?
Why do you find answering >>53882690 impossible? Does anyone pay you to do this or do you do it for free? >>53881661

>>53882891
to debate this
why is the partnership you've been shilling for 30 pbtid so much more important than everything else that has transpired so far?

>>53882883
The archive link was already posted. Why do you spend so much time doing this?

>>53882894
It's a partnership with Vodafone+Mastercard+Tata+IBM+R3 lmao

That's huge in and of itself.

>>53882892
what is the point of continuously engaging in passive aggressive arguments with people you deem mentally ill, especially if you're not interested on engaging with their arguments? I think you can do better yourself
>>53882895
why do you find engaging with the actual argument so repulsing?
>>53882897
what archive link? what is the image I've posted to other threads? come on bro, at least put some effort
>>53882906
>36 members + Accenture +IBM + Microsoft +ING+Nasdaq+SDX+ UBS +blockchain + Digital Asset+Neo Global Development + R3 + Google + Oracle + the 4 biggest Korean banks + chinese government + WEF
bigger than this? I highly doubt it

>>53882911
>>53882357
>>53882507
>still can’t answer the question
>plays dumb
Kek

>>53882911
Sometimes partnerships take time or go nowhere.
What's your point?

Also, InterWorkAlliance was not a product, it was vaguely about "promoting blockchain".
This Vodafone thing is a working product.

>>53882911
>I think you can do better yourself
Good point. I hope you manage to unfuck your brain. Best of luck.

>>53882921
>Sometimes partnerships take time or go nowhere
my point is when it comes to chainlink, they go nowhere more often than not and thanks for bringing this up yourself
I rest my case
>>53882920
these posts aren't all me though but I got the pic from the anon who originally posted it couple of months ago, but even then, what's wrong with these posts? each and every one of them offers valid criticism and you can't even refute this
>>53881661
this pasta however has been spammed endlessly in every thread
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/The%20usual%20discord%20nufudders/
but this is normal and organic, right?
you people are all over the place today lol

>>53882966
>you people are all over the place today lol
This is a Chainlink board. We ARE all over the place, yes. You would know this if you weren't a newfag.

>>53882991
just because you've been astroturfing this board for 5 years it doesn't mean it's yours bruh
anyway this sentiment used to be meaningful when LINK raped the market, not anymore.
if you still want to proclaim that LINK is the "God Protocol" you have to stand your ground and address every criticism no matter how shitty or stupid it might be to you.

>>53882966
>my point is when it comes to chainlink, they go nowhere more often than not
This is true for literally all of crypto, see the EEA.
The key to real-world adoption is oracles. When "it" does happen, it'll be through Chainlink. And this Vodafone thing is a prime candidate.

And if you're so sure this Vodafone thing will turn out to be nothing, you wouldn't be posting about it here for hours on end.

>>53883014
the EEA is still alive and kicking, the IWA is literally dead

>MUCH PARTNERSHIPS
It's not 2017 anymore, retards. Chainlink token is not used by literally any enterprise. Seethe cope and dilate.

>>53882911
>why do you find engaging with the actual argument so repulsing?
see
>>53882895

>>53883018
>the EEA is still alive and kicking
It's been 6 years, and nothing has ever happened.

>>53883014
>And if you're so sure this Vodafone thing will turn out to be nothing, you wouldn't be posting about it here for hours on end.
>no true scotchman fallacy
it's very easy for me, you keep coming back with the most silly retorts, I can't help myself
>>53883029
see
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/The%20usual%20discord%20nufudders/

>>53883033
https://decrypt.co/114761/us-banks-launch-digital-dollar-blockchain-platform-pilot
how many fed pilots has LINK had?

>>53883034
>I can't help myself
You sure can't.

>>53882966
>>53883002
>>53883018
just doubles down on gaslighting and concern trolling
but still cant answer
>>53882895

OP here. Another moment of confirmation was the Celsius crash. Just months before, Chainlink was still advertising them as a trusted partner with their logo on powerpoint slides. Then Celsius rugs and the CL team just acts like it never happened. Not a peep. Thats when I realized the whole thing is just a house of cards.

>>53883047
you can't either bro, but at least I try to offer actual arguments instead of constant deflection and logical fallacies
>>53883049
>doubles down on gaslighting
the irony coming from the man who spends every day reposting the same tired and uninspiring pasta about discord nufudderz
https://archived.moe/biz/search/text/The%20usual%20discord%20nufudders/

>>53883046
That article has nothing to do with ETH or the EEA lol
That's the second time you made this same mistake.

>>53883055
>you can't either bro
Except I'm literally talking about my investment lol

>>53883055
>"pastas are only ever used by one person!"
>this is his attempted deflection from the fact that he can never, ever address
>>53882895

>>53883060
>private variant of Ethereum known as Quorum.
I'm criticizing your investment so you are the prime candidate for discussion, given you own it.
>>53883062
>"pastas are only ever used by one person!"
but wait, your argument against me is
>images are only ever used by one person!
kek, are you ok there little buddy?

>>53883072
>>private variant of Ethereum known as Quorum
Quorum is an ETH fork developed by JP Morgan; it has nothing to do with the Ethereum foundation or the EEA. It's like saying Litecoin is Bitcoin.
Plus, that reference to Quorum has nothing to do with the subject matter of the article, it's only brought up as a comparison.

How embarrassing.

>>53883101
sigh
https://cointelegraph.com/news/norwegian-central-bank-uses-ethereum-to-build-national-digital-currency

>>53883111
They're forking Ethereum, anon. It's the same deal as Quorum.
Also, nothing to do with the EEA, which is its own collection of enterprises and institutions.

Strike three, you're out.

>>53883072
see
>>53882895

>>53883111
>33 posts about a token he doesnt hold now
so anyway, back to
>So why exactly are you obsessed with "the clowns holding a brick lemon as an asset, falling off a near 3 year cliff" again?
>Why do you find answering >>53882690 impossible? Does anyone pay you to do this or do you do it for free? >>53881661

>>53883133
>Quorum is a fork of ETH by JPM, nothing to do with EEA
newsflash anon, JPM owns ETH
https://coinculture.com/au/business/the-secret-disclosed-jpmorgan-owns-critical-ethereum-infrastructure/
https://consensys.net/quorum/
Quorum was designed by Consensys and JPM, both are members of the EEA, it retains compatibility with ETH's dapps, and to state it that it has nothing to do with ETH or EEA is disingenuous
actually, by applying the same logic here, we can safely assume that link won't be used for private DLT solutions either, does Quorum or Hyperledger verifiably use link's oracles anybody?
>inb4 breadcrumbs from 2018

>>53883255
>newsflash anon, JPM owns ETH
And yet they forked it.

>Quorum was designed by Consensys and JPM, both are members of the EEA
And yet the EEA has literally nothing to do with any of this, weird how that works huh?

And again: that reference to Quorum has NOTHING to do with the substance of that article anyway, so your whole post is moot from the start.

>>53883255
You dug yourself into a hole anon. It is painfully obvious that Chainlink is being held to a much higher standard than even ETH when it comes to usage of the token, meeting deadlines, price performance, partnerships etc. You literally can't and won't refute this, not even with another 34 posts. See you next thread.

>>53883387
>It is painfully obvious that Chainlink is being held to a much higher standard than even ETH
This.

For years now one of the classic fuds against Link has been "they'll fork the network".
Well guess what, institutions have already been forking ETH for years now (Quorum, Norway, ...) and it never hurt ETH one bit.

every morning there’s been a guy fudding chainlink with near 50 pbti

lol

lmao

i think i will buy more LINK today

>>53878813
whitepaper 2.0
it was pure cope
still holding though like a delusional gambler

>>53883425
you seem mad, did you switch IDs?

;) im buying more LINK as we speak.

>>53882318
Funny how nothing ever came of BSN or the "interwork alliance". What about Baseline? Provide? What happened to all the fags like wolpert and rhodes?

>>53878813
Me I could retire at 50$ link
Also me but I want to buy a 3rd world government . Only need it to go to 500 . Huge regrets

>>53883993
>Funny how nothing ever came of BSN or the "interwork alliance".
They merged with the Global Blockchain Business Council in September 2021.

https://gbbcouncil.org/news/iwa-merges-with-gbbc/

I'm surprised you're not up to speed on this, you seem incredibly invested in Chainlink on an emotional level.
>Under the direction of the GBBC, IWA will continue to drive the creation of open standards, protocols, and specifications for tokenized business services on a global scale through the development of its Token Taxonomy, InterWork, and Analytics Frameworks. IWA will also launch a comprehensive certification program based on its frameworks.

Hmm. Standards. Interesting.

This is a bit more recent though:

https://gbbcouncil.org/news/introducing-the-2023-gbbc-ambassador-cohort/

Just a month or so old.
Ctrl+F Chainlink = 1 Result.
Hmm. Interesting. It would seem they're still all working together and that you've been caught talking total shite yet again. How humiliating for you.

>>53883993
BSN and Baseline are still very much alive and active, Interworkalliance never did anything other than issue their launch announcement.

>>53878813
i sold above 35 so i dont even care what you are saying sorry bud

>>53884227
kek spoke too soon on IWA

>>53882966
Oh yeah for sure it’s not you, he’s just another 50pbtid fudder who happens to have the same writing style and use terms like bro and bruh in half his posts. You’re so transparent, it’s hilarious

>>53884227
>>53884230
Announcing announcements, kek. This is incredible cope. They will continue this as long as you fall for it. I'm sure Oracle will hire Fernando back to restart the Chainlink startups program too, right?

>>53884325
>Announcing announcements
what?

>>53878813
way too many dudes on link. why would you buy it so that a million retards can cash out on you?

>>53884325
kek cope much

Hey fudders, I am buying. Yes I sold at $35+ and I am buying now. No, nothing you can say will stop me. I am immune, I know what I hold. You have no power over me, I have already won

there are sure are a lot of posts in here
too bad none of them suggest the PRICE will got up anytime soon

>>53884325
Do you see this picture? This is a description of an adult. He does adult things and works for adult companies. These projects take time, you see? He's not sat on his bum-bum fudding Stinky Linkies all day while his mummy makes him tendies and washes his crusty underpants. He is busy working. He is one man in a company of hundreds. Chainlink are a serious organisation who hire serious people. Adults. Eric Schmidt is an adult. Kemal El Moujahid is an adult. Charlie Moore is an adult. They didn't get to work at Barclays, Lloyds of London, Google and Meta because they were children. Now they work at Chainlink alongside a large number of other experienced, competent professionals. Working. Building.
You, as a child, lack the comprehension of the time it takes to make something amazing, something that changes the world, but these people do not. I don't know why you feel the need to lie and fud and act like a child, anon but it means nothing. You can't change the truth.

If there is anyone else reading this who is on the fence or perhaps a newfag who is falling for the fud, please go here and click a few names.

https://www.signalhire.com/companies/chainlink-labs/employees

Chainlink aren't messing about. They have their hands in more pies than a leper in a bakery. There's a reason we're never selling. The fudders are a pathetic bunch whose delusion and impotent seething grows ever louder with every month recently as it becomes more and more obvious that Chainlink has won. It won ages ago. It is inevitable. If it weren't for the price suppression it would be worth hundreds right now.
You have a chance to accumulate for 7 dollars. Don't let yourself down.

>>53884524
Oh, and please note on that picture it clearly states that 'Chainlink is the ONLY enterprise grade Oracle (middleware)' that meets their standards.
Chainlink Oracles Power Everything.

seething nolinkie posting his little "Visa&Mastercard pause crypto rush" pic itt in 3... 2...

>>53884325
You should just abandon thread after getting BTFO this hard anon. This weak cope is even more embarrassing.

>>53884643
It would appear that he has, kek.

>>53881947
>>53882004
Yeah let’s post some screenshots guys. Here’s my contribution

>>53878813
the Chainlink fudder paradox is real. you have to fud to keep sentiment under control but the incessant fud only reinforces the fact that we should never sell and should in fact keep buying. you guys are caught in a death spiral but don't seem to realize it.

Anyone think these delusional LINK permabulls ITT can post a wallet with even 20K LINK? Why should we listen to them again? Are they just coping their asses off because even if they’re right we still win? Are they seething about the fact that we bought insane stacks of LINK at 20-40c and are being objective about the dogshit performance? Do they not realize how retarded they look trying to talk down to anons who will be exponentially richer than them if they’re proven right kek

>>53884227
this literally means the IWA failed and "rebranded" cutting any official ties to useless "members" such as NEO and HBAR and unlike IWA, chainlink is not listed anywhere as a member or a partner of the GBBC, and this is the reason why they haven't advertised such, unlike with the IWA. Nice attempt at being completely disingenuous.
>Hmm. Standards. Interesting.
hmm, not really, it's actually the exact same goal announced back in 2020, further proving my point that they simply got rebranded and dropped the shitcoins.
All in all this comes out as a downgrade to the perceived explicitly stated membership link and the other shitcoins had with IWA.
>https://gbbcouncil.org/news/introducing-the-2023-gbbc-ambassador-cohort/
>ctrl+f ethereum = 2 results
>ctrl+f ripple = 1 result
>ctrl+f iota = 1 result
>ctrl+f polygon = 1 result
>ctrl+f livepeer = 1 result
does this mean I have to buy them anon? or could it simply be that this is paid marketing amounting to nothing tangible? just some food for thought

>>53885358
Get a life breh

>ctrl+f link = 1 result

>>53885358
hahah the cope. You got fucking BTFO you retard. You didn't even know about any of this shit when I made that post and it took you ONE HOUR AND THIRTY FIVE MINUTES to come up with this wretched excuse for a response!
As I said, you are child. Let the adults work, and stop embarrassing us all with your silliness.

>>53884917
>>53885060
Have you considered selling?
Getting this butthurt can't be good for your blood pressure.

Token not needed unironically

>>53884524
>bro this such a serious business with only serious investors bro

This post was brought to you by VOLT INU

WAIT A MINUTE, CHAINLINK IS PARTNERING WITH VODAFONE???

>>53885544
>>53885727
10K LINK. Timestamped screenshot of a wallet. Surely you both have at least fucking 10K, right? I mean you’re not actually here talking shit to people with 50-100x more LINK than you, right?… Right?

I realized it was unironically vaporware when that anon in the giant thread the other day proved its utility value was below a couple cents. Luckily I hadn’t been holding years like some other people here

>>53888275
oh yeah the new link fudder who was rejected by chainlink? Yeah that guy dismantled the project in that thread. Literally no-one could rebut him.

>>53885544
so hes not wrong then, you dont have a counter argument just shit talking?

>>53888275
post link pls

>>53884643
>>53884834
Why waste my time? As >>53885358 said, LINK is not involved in the Global Blockchain Boo boo Council. You freaks always reach with BSN China, or the South Korean banks meme, or some shitty subsidiary like T-Systems. Not once have we seen any material positive outcome for your shitcoin. Address me as sir, boy

>>53889084
You would argue the opposite of anything I said no matter what it was and pretend to have 'won' regardless of how inane whatever you said was.

It's pointless really. I've made myself clear. Chainlink has won. It is being intergrated into multiple systems the world over. BILLIONS of wallets will be connected to it over the next few years, transactions trillions of dollars worth of data. The information is out there for anybody to see. I am euphoric. You can say anything you like, anything at all. I have never been more convinced and at ease with this investment. I buy more whenever I can.
I genuinely hope, despite how cringe you are, that you get to feel so comfy at some point in your life, too, although if you genuinely don't own any Chainlink I fear it will be a long, long wait.
Good luck.

>>53889273
>Chainlink has won
won what? they just roled out beta version of staking. A very crucial part of the network. They can barely get major exchanges to use proof of reserve and price feeds are paid for by token holders, all that in six years. What have they wont exactly?

>>53889176
>LINK is not involved in the Global Blockchain Boo boo Council
There is

>>53889176
no need

>>53889176
to lie.

>>53889355
>CHAINLINK LABS IS THE ONLY ENTERPRISE GRADE ORACLE INFRASTRUCTURE (BLOCKCHAIN 'MIDDLEWARE') THAT ENABLES ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CARBON ECOSYSTEM TO SECURELY AND EASILY CONNECT THEIR EXISTING SYSTEMS, PROCESSES AND DATA TO ALL MAJOR BLOCKCHAIN NETWORKS.
The standard. It's over.
Chainlink has won.

>>53889376
so then when is the price going up?

>>53889381
But you don't own any?

>>53889389
when is the price going up anon?

>>53889399
The implication you're making is that it will never go up. Why are you even here? You either believe or you don't. There's nothing else that needs to be said.
I'm never selling, anon. I hope you understand.

>>53889426
the implication im asking if the project is as valuable as it is and it has "won". why is the price not higher anon?

>>53889458
token not needed

>>53889458
Because the price is heavily manipulated to keep it low. You know this, of course.

>>53889469
are you retarded anon? you posted a bunch of picutres, i dont think you are. Are you smarter then the market anon?

>>53889505
Don't take this the wrong way but you're a jew, aren't you, anon?
My jewdar is incredibly good.

>>53889511
why are you deflecting? can you just answer simple questions? are you smarter then the market? the market knows everything you posted and it would take that into account. Why is the price where its at?

>>53889521
>The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with theirargumentative tactics. At the outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these apostles one's hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterday's defeat, he pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed me the more--the abundance of their verbiage or the artful way in which they dressed up their falsehoods. I Gradually came to hate them.

You sure argue like a jew. All of you do. Could it be you're worried about the people on this board holding this very specific project? It would explain a lot.

>>53889539
im just asking questions and the only thing you have done or are good at is posting pics and text from other places.

>>53889552
I'm finished with you, jew. I'm buying more Linkies tomorrow. Have a pleasant evening.

>>53889574
ok cool.

>>53889574
Kek you need to shoop 90% of those cubes out of that pic poorfag

>>53889381
It's so obvious you're arguing in bad faith. You got BTFO'd fudcuck, and yet you immediately pivot to another topic. Like the other anon said, just like a Jew.

>>53884524
Saved

>>53878813
The devs there are the worst in space. The only good thing I gained from them is their partnership with allianceblock which brought my attention to one of my best projects atm.

>>53881514
try high dose taurine for your tinnitus friend

>>53889376
I can do the same thing with 3 lines of python code, blockchain is a database and no sane person would create something on it since it's a really shitty database. ChainLink solves a problem that doesn't exists. They can perfect their oracle all they want, in the end of the day nobody needs that. That's why I made what you made collectively in 1 week with DBI. Because people pay for hype, not for techblabla.

>>53890243
my questions have been the same you illiterate mutt. is he or you smarter then the market? why is the price low if such bullish info is out there for all to see.

>>53889376
>carbon ecosystem
>thinks this means anything with a pending regulatory crackdown and global depression/war

>>53890422
thanks I’ll check it out. It’s gotten better since then but always good to have something in case it gets bad again

>>53890422
Also how high of a dose are we talking? Like 3g?

>>53889376
I used to repeat stuff like this too. Until I realized it has nothing to do with coin price. The zero market reaction to Eric Schmidt joining was also a massive redpill.

>>53889355
>automated balance sheet audits
Holy shit... I'm in private sector accounting but they're coming for er jerbs sooner than we think aren't they...

>>53890697
The market is as retarded as you and these fudders. Just look at the top 20 it's a joke. How can you expect to beat the market if you just follow it. Go buy a dog coin.

Seriously wonder if there were boomer forums back in the day shit talking Amazon and Apple and the like

>>53892631
There were, especially immediately after the dotcom bubble burst. Exact same rhetoric, down to "it doesn't matter what news you get, the price will never budge"

>>53881514
OG linkers went from 25c to 25 dollar and dumped on your ass.

>>53888174
Post wallet brownoid. Each time you try to larp as an "OG" it becomes embarassing.

>>53888174
Why are you so angry that Vodafone (and Mastercard, and IBM, and Tata, and R3) are launching real-world usage with Chainlink?

Both LINK/USD and LINK/BTC had a phenomenal performance in the bear market following the 2017/18 bull run. While other coins capitulated to new lows, Chainlink outperformed. Biz speculated that this bear market outperformance would translate to bull markets too. Well, the bull market came and the team relentlessly dumped 1.5 million tokens a week onto the market to provide runway for Chainlink Labs. Chainlink was stagnant through the whole of the last bull run, anyone holding majority LINK had serious opportunity cost relative to all the other coins that exploded (SOL and others come to mind). Even today in a bear market, there are still huge opportunities such as the recent Blur airdrop, Arbitrum plays and countless others. The opportunity cost of holding Chainlink has been and will be too great, there won't be a singularity type event for the price and it's been years now. This is not FUD. I was all-in LINK for the previous bull-run and ended up diversifying into other coins mid-way through and made some decent money, but being all-in this coin was seriously detrimental to my performance.

I recommend people to predominantly be in ETH/BTC now and get into altcoins a bit later; but sadly not LINK.

>>53894576
>Well, the bull market came and the team relentlessly dumped 1.5 million tokens a week
kek the team "relentlessly dumped" during the bear market too, when Link outperformed the entire market.

Oopsie

The second stinktards started unironically worshiping “Chainlinkgod” and posting his midwit opinions on here was when I knew it was over and market sold everything.

>>53894583
Yes that's true, although at that time they dumped 750k tokens per week not 1.5m. And I think accumulation of LINK at that time was able to offset the selling pressure.

But OK even if I'm wrong, are you denying that LINK severely underperformed in the last bull run? Are we here to make money or just autistically hold coins that underperform and romanticise them?

>>53894603
>yes they were also dumping back when Link outperformed the market
>but there were more people buying so that explains the price going up

we got ourselves a regular genius up in here

Also LINK partners with Vodafone. Nothing on Chainlink's twitter, price is up 2.67%. Nice.

>>53894616
I can see that you're not actually addressing the main points I made so you're just trolling

>>53894622
I directly addressed and completely trashed your "Link beat the entire market until they started dumping tokens" point.

>>53894617
>Nothing on Chainlink's twitter
Maybe they're saving the announcement for ETHDenver later today.
There was talk of some "alpha" getting dropped there.

>>53894616
Ha! Totally got him, now we can hodl this token to 0 in piece

>>53878813
>never run up in price
nobody can predict this, and anybody 'realizing' this is a deluded moron
chainlink is still a scam though

>>53894583
In English we say overperformanced the entire market ESL Bulgar lol they are NOT sending their best

>>53894665
I'm not the fudder, bucko.
Also pls change your id color, I already have dibs on it.

>>53894669
lmao this fudder things we can just change ID colors lol we have IDs here newfag
In 14 hours I need you to show up here
2590 Walnut St, Denver, CO 80205, USA
I know it looks like some weird back alley you'd probably murder a crack dealer in like GTA but hear me out. Chain Link the premium brand in Web 3 Oracles will be hosting an event in this glamorous crack alley and I want you to put down the crack pipe and attend. No this post is NOT advertising

OG marine, sold January 2020. It became clear they fulfilled the promise they set out to accomplish, and any future use was many years off.

>>53894832
2021*

>>53882416
>Absolutely no LINK bull with your temperament in 2017-2019 would have expected nor been content with this
The smart ones sold in the DeFi run in 2020 and reinvested.

>>53878813
holy sneed

>>53894849
You mean the ones not under the spell of years-long copium, yeah

>>53878813
I think you lied
Link is one of the major web3 project just like ORE, that provides solutions to web3, miss out on the run and regret

>>53878813
It is the height of biz comedy that cheeky demoralising memes about price performance from 2019 (picrel is the earliest instance of the "WTFWT 12.65" kekkery I could find) have exactly the same effect, 4 years later, after a whole bullrun, in 2023...

Chainlink.
Yeah right.
What were we talking about again?

>>53892631
shithead. im expecting to make money not beat anything. This info has been known for six years now and the market has decided the token is not worth shit. Is the price of food wrong just because you think it is? retards buy from the store all the time.

>>53895956
>the market has spoken!
The same market that thinks XRP and ADA belong at rank 6 and 7, while Chainlink isn't even top 20.
The man said the market is retarded, and he's right.

>>53895999
checked. Yah and chainlink is still 7$ with a network that cant sustain it self and price feeds after six years. it is retarded but thats the price

>>53896019
>with a network that cant sustain it self
What about ADA and XRP's network lmfao

>>53895501
I can't even remember the last time this piece of trash was above $10

Fuck that disgusting fat piece of shit of Sergey and fuck his empty promises

>>53883466
OMG LE EPIC OWN XDDDDD

FUDDERS COMPLETELY BTFOOO

>>53896039
Chainlink dumped below $10 because Bitcoin crashed on Link staking news, see pic.
Link was hovering just above $10 right before.

Coincidentally, Chainlink dumped below $20 because Bitcoin dumped on the Jan 1 staking news.

In conclusion, you're a massive (MASSIVE) retard.

>>53896027
i dont know about that shit. Its priced at what its price at

>>53896080
so then btc is king and link is a shit coin that still follows BTC

>>53896039
Why are you so emotional? It's only money.

>>53896082
>i dont know about that shit
obviously
Which is why you're a fool.

>>53896090
>still follows BTC
Maybe look up how trading and arbitrage bots work.

>>53896080
Imagine posting that garbage image and sitll believing the schizophrenic nonsense that Link is supprressed by the entire crypto market.

Some of you people have an IQ of a nigger. Sergey has underdelivered on EVERYTHING and he doesn't care about retail investors, but yeah keep spamming those schizo images I'm sure we'll pump anyday now

>>53896097
because i dont think im smarter then the market. Anon can i ask a simple question. If link has all these major finicial institutions working with it (swift, t systems, now vodaphone) why is the price low?

>>53896108
Jan 1:
>Chainlink releases staking news
>Bitcoin instantly starts dumping
>???
>Chainlink is dragged below $20

June 7:
>Chainlink releases staking news
>Bitcoin instantly starts dumping
>???
>Chainlink is dragged below $10

I mean I can't make it any clearer than this, but I guess retards gonna retard.

>>53896127
>If link has all these major finicial institutions working with it (swift, t systems, now vodaphone) why is the price low?
Because the market is as retarded as you are.

>>53896108
ladies and gentlemen, I present to you, another incel fud cuck. Let’s see how many posts he makes.

>>53882334
Dude. fuck you, you’re absolutely delusional

>>53896135
you're a dumb nigger

spamming nonsense won't make Link pump, stop it because you're just embarassing yourself with pathetic mental gymnastics which is typical of salty bagholders

>>53896151
>nonsense
Literally the only reason Link dumped under $10 is because Bitcoin dumped the second Link put out a major staking announcement.

>>53896135
again i dont think i can beat the market you do. Maybe you're just wrong bro

>>53896165
>i dont think i can beat the market
The market would have valued Link MUCH higher if not for the expertly-timed Bitcoin dumps.

>>53896162
>acts like a shit coin
>gets told its a shitcoin
> nah its the market its retarded. its def not me

>>53896182
>>acts like a shit coin
You don't have to be a shitcoin to follow major BTC dumps.
Bots make that happen either way.

>>53896080
So you are telling me link is a terrible investment?

>>53889574
Pathetic retard

still up from my original buy, still believe in the tech. wagmi

>>53896080
>LINK is literally pigshit squalor
>i mean, it's a complete fucking preposterous failure
>I've lose so much money and opportunity
>anyway
>it's not cuz i was wrong

>>53896351
>if Bitcoin dumps every time Link pumps, that means you were wrong about Link

>>53896369
Excuses, excuses. You're making up excuses. Because you are retarded. Too prideful to adapt. Enjoy your losing strategies for the rest of your life. I hope your ego-insulating headcanon provides you enough solace to be worth the sacrifice of years if gains.

>>53896411
>You're making up excuses.
haha yeah, "making up"

>>53896437
Apparently you're speaking some other language than ROI on a biz and finance board. Cool. Gl with that fantasy football tier game you're playing.

>>53896450
Are you saying the expertly-timed Bitcoin dumps don't directly impact Link's ROI?

>>53896467
I'm saying whatever nonsense you're focusing on is utterly meaningless to anyone who wants to make money. You're excusing your failures by concocting some other list of KPIs besides making actual money.

It's the same way all the other promising shitcoins of the past went.

>>53896505
>the reason why you're losing money doesn't matter
haha wow

>>53896630
Correct.
Maybe to you it does, in your crusade defence of your own ego. To the rest of the world, with its broad horizons and all its other opportunities, nope. The sooner you realise your coping mechanism of global conspiracy is no different to those applied by prideful bagholders in all the many other lots in the graveyard of denial the sooner you can actually readjust to the game of being an edge up on thr market. "If you were so smart, you'd have seen this coming" etc.

>>53890697
Because the price depends on retail sentiment, and retail is retarded. Do you really think price is a completely accurate indicator of true value? Do you think during the Dutch tulip craze tulips were priced at their true value? If the price of link was an accurate reflection of its true value then it would not have room to increase and there wouldn't be money to be made retard. JFL when you call me an illiterate mutt, these are the fundamentals of investing.

>>53896715
and the price is over valued. There is no way a network that cant support its self should be valued at what it is. either retail is retarded or you're retarded. You didnt learn much reading investopedia articles did you?

>>53896699
>You're just coping bro!
>You're just schizophrenic bro!
>This is just a subconscious freudian psychological mechanism bro!
>It's all in your head bro!
>Don't trust your lying eyes bro!

The very definition of gaslighting.

>>53896699
>Correct
You are the dumb money who looks at a chart and asks zero questions

>>53896744
>says the price is (rightfully) low
>then says the price is overvalued
Fix your capitalisation and grammar jew

>>53896801
unlike you i dont let my personal beliefs distract from the truth. i think it should be lower but clearly im wrong. The price is what it is. The difference being i dont need to do mental gymnastics about why im wrong but you do.
So again anon. Why isnt the price higher

>>53896744
>There is no way a network that cant support its self should be valued at what it is.
How do the XRP and ADA networks support themselves?

>>53896861
so you answer my question with another question ;cool.
in good faith ill answer. I dont know about ada or xrp.

>>53896885
I was answering a statement, not a question.

>>53896897
cool so answer my question then. Why is the price of link low?

>>53896913
Because big news, developments, pumps, ... are not allowed to get priced in.

>>53896080 >>53896437 >>53896467

>>53896931
or link holders are wrong, thats more likely the answer. The answer you keep dancing around. You are wrong anon its okay

>>53896944
Anon, I showed you literal, visual, verifiable proof.
Those three pics are some of the biggest news items Link has gotten in the past few years, and they were never allowed to be priced in.
And those are just three examples among many.

>>53897037
retarded then you're are fucking moron for buying this token that gets manipulated into the fucking ground. its a shit coin thats get "manipulapted" by king shitcoin. That's a sound investment to you?

>>53897066
Why do you care so much lol

>>53897066
>24 pbtid
i bet this is that other nigger that got up to like 35 pbtid in this thread before he changed
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE
Jesus christ.

>>53878813
Link is a literal piece of toilet paper, I knew earlier on and sold for some privacy project tokens and I'm not wrong yet.

>>53896080
>>53896437
>>53896467

Time to write a bot that follows LINK's twitter and whenever there's a major good news it'll short BTC.

when they hired a literal whore on their staff.

>>53896437
Ill play along with the suppression theory…so if theres a guaranteed price dump everytime Chainlink increases in price, how is someone else an idiot for not seeing it as a good investment?

>>53893954
I have (you)s from assblaster himself. Who the fuck are you faggot?

>>53894010
Yeah you’re right, those are awesome connections! Surely it will have an impact on the price, let me just pull up the cha-ACK

>>53894576
This is exactly how it went down. Good post

Jesus this thread is 300 posts of pure bitching. Bad for the mental health.
Also: tl;dr
Never selling.

>>53896080
HOLY COPE HAHAHAHAHAHA

>>53896135
Purely coincidences goy stop now and sell

>>53898379
People here have done that and made a killing. I’m too scared to because I know the minute I try it Link will shoot into the sky and liquidate me.

>>53878813
chaincucks are pathetic losers that exist to be made fun of =^)

Link tranny you will never be a real gem, you have no pumps, no gains. You have no lambos or mansions. Your tokenomics will never turn into pumpamentals no matter how hard you try. You are barren and gainless. Every real gem holder pitys you and looks at you with disgust. You will never make it. Your poorfolio will be written on your grave when you die. Your entire existence is an insult to Satoshi Nakamoto.