/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53800287
Good question. Them worker pools be a runnin'.

>>53800287

>>53800393
When?

>>53800287
Oil is a scam and green energy is the future.

Soon.

>>53801028
Good thing RLC is green computing

>>53800287
Because it'd be rank 13
Look at the top 13 cmc and tell me what those cryptos have what iExec doesn't
then you got your answer

>>53801020
They a runnin' now, but not helpin' the price, tho.

Digital hot air is $2 a gallon.

I got an idea frens. Since RLC is a stablecoin ...
Why don't we just print more RLC?
The higher supply would increase the marketcap and it would be in the top 10 no problem?

>>53802112
They have nothing. No users no use cases. It's all fake.

>>53802185
The low supply is one of the redeeming factors of being a RLC holder. That's why it's always stable

>>53802188
They have one or two things iExec doesn't.

>>53802247
Name them, users are all fake, no one actually uses crypto besides for scamming

>>53802247
Cringe

>>53802488
Kind of the point though. Fundamentals aren't the reason why many of them are ranked this high.
When has fundamentals alone (no hype, no adoption) ever pushed a coin close to the top 10?
Scammy adoption is better than close to no adoption.

BTC, ETH: obvious if you aren't a full retard
stablecoins: don't count
BNB: brand recognition (binance) + scammy adoption
XRP: normie hype in the past + ties to banks
ADA: normie hype, ETH developer
MATIC: adoption, most popular scaling solution
DOGE: crazy normie hype
SOL: idk desu. normie hype, I guess?
DOT: ETH developer, idk what else
SHIB: crazy normie hype

>>53803132
The market is cringe, true. Not my fault.

iExec should be ranked higher, true. But it's not yet top 13 material because that's not how the market works.
Now stop asking this question.

>>53803402
>no hype, no adoption
>implying RLC doesn't have hype as an AI/computing coin
I think we're just early, as always, biz wins again

>>53803435
>7 years of development
>I think we're just early
We're reaching bagholding cope levels that shouldn't even be possible.
Just hold for another decade, bro.

>>53803467
to be fair they've been in development for 95% of that time, why would anyone want to invest in that when they can invest in scams that go 10000x in a month?

until it's too late and RLC prices you out

>>53803498
actually what am i saying 95%, iExec is still in development and just now entering adoption roadmap stage.
stay poor noilers, i guess

>>53800393
Bump

>>53803498
>until it's too late and RLC prices you out
Why would this token ever have a crazy pump again? Its already on all big exchanges, it just released the long awaited worker pools and no one cares.
The only reason RLC went up a bit was the AI hype it bandwagond on but pumped way less than the real AI projects.

>>53803774
plenty of reasons it could pump im sure, keep doubting though as we accumulate and price people like you out slowly

>>53803435
>implying RLC doesn't have hype as an AI/computing coin
It doesn't yet. Not big enough. I hope the hype will grow though.

>>53803513
desu they said so 2020. They're really slow. I think they will get there but we will see.

>>53800420
He’s so handsome

>>53804556
He is spending your money on luxury goods right this very second!

https://youtu.be/8MTQK1VnKQo

After watching the RLC pajeets churn out this garbage I question what the team spends money on

https://youtu.be/8Xjyxz99MBs

like what the fuck is this

>>53805074
lol, lmao even

>>53805038
>>53805074
Pajeet bros...We're gonna WAGMI so hard

>>53805074
Judging from the production quality it was probably made by iExec themselves.