/biz/ - Business & Finance

Whos more cucked at this point, you guys or XRP?

>duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude w w w we have cornered the heckin oracle market

>>53687444
Checked. I demand that foundational tech infrastructure is built when I SAY SO and if it takes longer than that I’ll duuuuude post hundreds of times a week.
Take that, Sergey! I’m doing my part!

>>53687444
>>53687484
The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE
Jesus christ.

>>53687492
unironically this

>>53687444
It took Chainlink 2019 years to say that "staking is close".
If staking comes out in 2024 then Chainlink made the announcement only (5/2024)*100 = 0.25% too early. Is that a problem you slimy kike?

>60k Link staked
>Don't wish team to rush anything
>Happy to wait and plan new life when it comes
>Think Chainlink team are doing a marvellous job
>Enjoy watching developments
>Supacomfy and enjoying life
The actual life fudposters don't want you to know about but most Link holders lead

>>53687444
"His helmet was stifling, it narrowed his vision. And he must see far. His shield was heavy. It threw him off balance. And his target is far away."

Focus on what you need to achieve. Close off all other learned routines and complications. The fourth industrial revolution is in site, but far. Sergey is a focused and attuned warrior adeptly moving towards this. Past iterations, stances, estimates and features are his helmet and shield. Useful when they are but of no merit to hold when the arena changes.

This faggot only has like 7k link

The key point is link subsidizing defi.
Imagine the day that stops. Top kek. Crypto is such a shitshow.

>>53689536
They can’t monetize it because the entire sector will go bankrupt. People underestimate how many of the cash flows are organic

>>53688452
dangerously based and comfy

>>53687484
Why voyager has a Dallas mavericks logo?

>>53689605
Grim

stinkmarines...

>>53687664
Imagine writing this while you look and smell like this picture

>the entire defi market
cute that he thinks the entire defi market has anything to do with link whatsoever
defi has came, went, then came back again and link has played no part in any major or successful defi platform, it's just not worth risking such an important part of a defi protocol on an unaccountable, unauditable, middleman black box from a third party. which is why any defi potocol worth anything is doing it all in house.

>>53688452
imagine how much more comfortable you'd be if you weren't feminine enough to get emotionally attached to somebody else's pet project and sold the perma-top in 2020.

the alt market is entirely PvP and you've been utterly outplayed by the people you thought were "linkmarines" in 2019.

Link baggies are crypto GME baggies
Kek baggies

>>53689418
let me guess you are an indian nigger that lost over half of your link tokens

>>53690540
so indian niggers actually hold this pos?
huh, that explains the spam I guess

>>53688341
>it took chainlink only 2019 years
They didn’t announce they were working on staking in year 0 and anticipated it taking 2019 years fucking christ you are delusional

>>53687444
checked
link is a simple pnd scam that overshot its target
>the price of a cup of coffee
so many times they had no choice but to keep the farce going
who knows what they will prepare(but not deliver obviously) for next few years
the star citizen of crypto

>>53690656
He's a fudder. That means he doesn't speak English at home. Give the pajeet a break hes just trying to earn an honest glass of cool refreshing cow piss and rupees by fudding link anon

>>53690416
I have 9 of pic rels. Ouch. Sorry that hurts. You shouldn't let it get to you so much ;)

>>53692374
see, you're trying to gloat about 4% when it wont even be possible in your lifetime to recoup the money you've lost by not selling 2020 at that rate.

>>53692601
I'm really sorry you guys got scammed out of your Links and can't get them back but it's really not my problem. You beating yourself up endlessly for your mistakes isn't good for your mental wellbeing. You should try to let go and see it as part of your journey. Sitting on here doing what you do will likely give you a cancer eventually. It does happen. Be warned.

>>53692645
I'm really sorry you guys got psyoped to keep bagholding your Links and you lack the mental fortitude to sell but it's really not my problem. You beating yourself up endlessly for your mistakes isn't good for your mental wellbeing. You should try to let go and see it as part of your journey. Sitting on here doing what you do will likely give you a cancer eventually. It does happen. Be warned.

>>53692601
At 4% per year you'd only need a few years to make up youer 2020 value even if prices stay the same, which won't happen. We know nexo is bankrupt and FTX shorted link too much and collapsed. So with CCIP coming soon it'llk be up only. Sorry!

>>53692668
>At 4% per year you'd only need a few years to make up youer 2020 value
the absolute state of linkoids literacy and math comprehension

>>53692645
>scammed out of your Links
the alt grift is the same whatever you are. if you don't sell your once-only pump you'll never get a chance to ever again.
you fell for the staking meme, i.e. the please-don't-sell-your-coins meme, while everyone else unloaded and walked away never to return.

remember, emotional, feminine "investors" like you are playing a game designed for those of us with testosterone capable of leaving emotion at the door and actively dumping dead weight. but thanks for playing all the same.

>>53692685
It's all that catfood they eat, must have muddled their brains

>>53692685
IT takes about 5 years to make it up to 20

>>53692702
>by few years I meant half a decade lel
and what about the top of 169k satoshis, moron

>>53692668
yeah, and in those short "few years" the price of link will have continued it's trend to zero against bitcoin or ethereum.

this kind of fake "staking" is designed to stop the weak from selling, make them feel like they're winning, and further entrench their sunk-cost-fallacy. it's a very clear and obvious game.

>>53692660
>sorry you put 60k Link into the official Chainlink OG community pool where you can be sure no fuckery can happen, and will earn handsome, ongoing rewards for life plus a very lucrative slice of earnings from Build project partners.
Kek, I bet you are lolol

>>53692716
i'd bet you these bagholders never even consider the true (btc) price of the alts they're holding. they probably even measure in dollars.

>>53688452
>Think Chainlink team are doing a marvellous job
Prime example of Stockholm-Syndrome.
Don't say you haven't been warned when Link goes below $1.

>>53692737
mindbroken
keep bagholding bro

>>53687444
currynigger that you?

telegram trannies are subhuman

>>53692762
Glad to have your blessing, champ!
PS How does it feel knowing you failed to get me and others to sell? You spent A LOT of hours on this, didn't you?

>$6.50

>>53692796
glad you liked it, muhrine
PS How does it feel knowing you failed to get me and others to buy? You spent A LOT of hours on this, didn't you? Aren't you the guy spamming his 9 wallets every day here? kek

>>53692815
That's it, I'm trying to pump the Link price by shilling it to dweebs like you
>9 wallets
Well done, your reading comprehension is improving!

>>53692872
as opposed to what you moronic shill
>That's it, I'm trying to dump the Link price by fudding it to dweebs like you
you're obviously trying to "remoralize" desperate baggies
>look guise I'm an OG and I have locked up more than half million US dollarinoos so go ahead and feel better about your sub 1k stacks getting locked up indefinitely!!

>>53692796
>failed to get me and others to sell
you seem to think people making fun of bagholders that keep spamming their dead alt on biz somehow care if you ride your ico token down to zero or not.

i wonder what you guys think of the gme crowd, or the xrp crowd.

>>53687444
Don't own Link so don't really care about it's price action but from working at a crypto Company with far less people then Chainlink Labs (not as well known as Link but everyone here has heard of it). We are knocking out features weekly and in the early stages of staking that shouldnt take no more then 3 months tops to implement.

The roadmap timeline for LINK seems reasonable but actual deliveries being years late makes no sense unless there is abysmal Product Development processes.

>>53692920
>you seem to think I care
I know you do, anon >.<

>>53689605
>They can’t monetize it because the entire sector will go bankrupt.
Some of the oracle feeds are self-sustaining now. As crypto gains more mainstream traction more and more feeds/services will be self-sustaining and won't need to be subsidized by Chainlink Labs.
That's the whole point of Chainlink SCALE, which is to get the services subsidized in the short-term so that more fees are generated and then eventually stopping the subsidization once suitable. I wonder how successful they've been with SCALE though, I know they recently onboarded another project to their program but aside from that we haven't heard a word from the previous participants.

>>53692920
>I wonder
you don't have to, here's a thread about cbdcs (with zero actual discussion about them whatsoever) which resulted to them throwing shit at each other due to their schizoid theories >>53673229
both parties are saying the other project is a midwit trap, without realizing all of them are midwits, it's hilarious and I recommend you to read it
>>53692956
>As crypto gains more mainstream traction
yeah, allow me to inform you of a minor little detail, it doesn't because nothing works as intended
crypto is waiting for LINK to solve the trilemma all by itself, remember arbitrum? kek

>>53692954
you're partially right, i do find it more entertaining the more the price retraces. breaking $1 will be a very fun time for the few that still care at that point.

>>53687444
Checked, this is bullish for Chainlink (Ticker: LINK)

>>53692992
>it doesn't because nothing works
We're transitioning out of the wild-west days of crypto. Smart-contracts came with Ethereum in 2015, were you expecting a revolutionary new tech to have full tech-maturity + mainstream adoption in just 7-8 years? Starting in 2021 this shit entered mainstream consciousness and starting last year we started getting actual institutional adoption.
I will speak about my bags because they're the protocols I know best about, but SWIFT is entering blockchain space and currently working with Chainlink, Oasis protocol has institutional adoption (Meta AI, Equifax, and two genetics companies), and Avalanche has legit partnerships (as in, Avalabs did not have to pay for a "partnership") with some mainstream players (GREE and KKR). Mainstream traction is coming onboard now, less than a decade since the advent of smartcontracts. Seems like a normal time-frame to me.

yea chainlink is trash, nobody should buy it. newfriends, stay away
*SLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURP*

>>53693091
>a few insignificant PoCs and stress tests done in controlled environments with institutions is "adoption"
>SWIFT is entering blockchain space
it's been 7 years since sibos 2016, don't you think the present tense is a bit redundant
you forgot hbar, much institutional adoption sirs
here's your actual adoption bro, and it doesn't look that good

>>53688452
I just imagine them in their goon caves dimly lit by their computer screens with 10 browsers of filth open between them breathing heavily feeling disgusted with themselves after a 4 hour fap session to Nigger tranny cuck porn typing on their cum crusted keyboards FUD nonsense like the OP.

>>53693156
>pic
I'm sure some Web1.0 companies went bust too (pets.com), or some Web2.0 companies failed (myspace), does that mean the Internet is bust?
>it's been 7 years since sibos 2016, don't you think the present tense is a bit redundant
Again, a paradigm shifting, disruptive technology won't get onboarded straight away. The tech was shit for several years, Ethereum was basically just a proof of concept. 2018-present is when the tech started getting refined into useable services/products that would facilitate mainstream adoption.
So you get an idea, in the medical industry it takes like 10+ years from Proof of Concept until a new treatment gets released. Do you think something which is disrupting the current system which processes quadrillions of dollars is just going to migrate to Web3/crypto in a much shorter timeframe than that? It's been 8 years since Ethereum released, and we're now getting legit adoption. We're on schedule.

>>53693156
>you forgot hbar, much institutional adoption sirs
As I mentioned, I only spoke about the bags I hold because they're what I know most about.

>>53693156
>sibos 2016
What happened at Sibos 2016?

>>53693345
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6frxYOk4fA
16:00.

>>53693401
This PoC was presented the year after, in October 2017. Which is 5 years and four months ago.
Also, there's a much more recent PoC with Swift.

>>53693268
>I'm sure some Web1.0 companies went bust to
that's literally the Blythe Masters connection going bust bro, blockchain shipping logistics was a huge usecase for years
glad that you mentioned the dot com bubble, I'll only say that believing that the 10 year upwards trajectory of BTC wasn't the equivalent of the dot com PnD is delusional, please keep in mind that regarding speculative gains, we've yet to see most of these internet stocks reaching their 2001 valuations after almost two decades
crypto had it's time, and if we assume you're correct and the wild west of crypto is behind us (doubt) whatever project may survive most likely won't experience a parabolic rise
>The tech was shit for several years
the tech is still shit
>we're now getting legit adoption. We're on schedule
nothing points to legit adoption though, you keep parroting that phrase with no substance
>>53693451
https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2016/09/26/swift-kicks-off-sibos-by-unveiling-blockchain-contest-winners/
>article date September 2016

>>53692998
God I hope that happens. I’d sell my house to buy sub $1

>>53693268
>Again, a paradigm shifting, disruptive technology won't get onboarded straight away.

We're closer to a decade than we are farther from it.

>>53694521
if at all... none of this has to actually happen. Obviously the cult doesn't understand that

>>53692689
What did you sell when?

I love posting this image (1 of my 9 staking wallets) because it makes fudders seethe and froth like nothing else. Watch how quickly we get a triggered one replying, absolutely foaming with rage n cope.
Happy days. Happy Link holding.

>>53693091
>Avalanche has legit partnerships
cool so does Hedera. It's not 2018 anymore.
Obvious CL shill is obvious.

>>53687467
At least XRP fags can blame the US government for screwing them over and say they failed due to external interference like the Nazis. LINK collapsed all on its own, just like communism.

>>53694521
we really did get scammed.

>>53692786
>duuuuuuuuuuuude youre indian if you dont join le cult
>hurrrr durrrr its a pajeet guysthhhh! I foughted le fudderzzzz

Buy the red rabbit token or I will fuck your wife my basterd bitch

SELL NOW

>>53687484
Fucking disingenuous faggot you are. None of these are real you larping little pedo. Fuck off

2/16 approached

>>53687444
>2023
>people still holding chainshit

OH NONONONONONO LINKBROS PAJEETS ARE SPAMMING OUR COIN ON TWITTER WTF DO WE DO?????? THIS IS BEARISH AS FUCK!!!!

>>53689536
what does “subsidizing defi” mean?

>>53700480
Defi relies on Chainlink price feeds but they don’t pay as much as they should. They do pay but the price feeds are subsidized by us while Chainlink builds out their network.