/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53537288
Dont u fucking talk bad about my coin, i will call you mentally ill

>Looks it up
>LINK was $7 when staking launched
>BTC was indeed $16,900
>Outperformed hard by dinosaur coin

It’s over for chainlink, I refuse to believe they’re this incompetent by accident

>>53537288
Well, when you have a group of janny tier fudders that do it for free, you start to realize anyone that subhuman will get punished. Look at 4chan jannies, they cut and mutilate their cocks off, everyone hates them and have the respect of a sub nigger creature...

However, the subhumanness of a janny is more of a mythical legend. There is no evidence against them like chainlink fudders. With chainlink fudders, the last few weeks have exposed them with hard evidence to be addicted to tranny bbc porn and extreme incels.

Actually worst of all, they don't just do it for free like jannies, they pay literally pay to do it. Anyone that low will suffer. I don't even hold chainlink but I know it will moon just for these things lower than the untouchables on the Indian Caste system to fullfill their destiny

>>53537288

>>53537318
Apologies, it was $7. Still, $7 to $7 while BTC goes up $8000 per coin. Biggest retards in crypto

>>53537288
I think I will buy chainlink

sure but btc doesn't give you any passive income
we're getting income in link with smallish market cap + build airdrops

>>53537320
>>53537352
>>53537365
>Damage control brigade finds thread, immediately tries to shit it up
>BTC went from $16k to $24k since staking released
>LINK has lost value since staking released

Cucks, have a (You)

>>53537288
Ahh I see so youre saying it's time for a Link run? Good point. Will swing trading wallet to Link now. Huge rise imminent.
Thanks anon, /biz is useful sometimes!

>>53537288
>>53537359
>>53537425
>these low iq fud spam posts brought to you by alcoholic drug addicts, suicidal coomers, guys that complain about their phimosis on pol, and polish "males" that love bbc porn
yeah sorry dude but i'm just not going to sell them (my chainlink tokens)

scholar

>>53537456
>yfw the people posting these insane projection screenshots are the losers depending on LINK for happiness and continually getting btfo on the daily

Sucks to be you cuck. I'm holding BTC

don't you guys ever get tired of this?

>>53537464
and that's all you'll have, instead of over a dozen build tokens amounting to 10000x return. you will never have them because you did not stake and you cannot stake no matter what then price of chainlink is because the pool is full. see you next epoch, maybe you'll get in this time

>>53537495
this.
make them into NFTs anons and sell this FUD. I think you should use Chainlink Keepers to keep the FUD up to date as the scam evolves

>>53537288
I'm not going to buy any. Do you think you're clever? You think reverse psychology will get us to buy this shit now? It's fucking dead. Move on with your life. Sell YOUR stack, fucking faggot op.

Nobody seems to care about any alts right now.

Here is a pic of SBF allegedly taken by Sergey Nazarov in the San Fransisco Chainlinklabs office. According to the latest court documents Sergey Nazarov was going to use this picture as blackmail material

>>53537464
"I hold btc but spend thousands of hours posting about some allegedly irrelevant oracle shitcoin."
"Also please stop finding out that people like me are even lower forms of life than biz jannies... if you find anything its just uh... projection! Yeah, so you better stop looking into us."
LMAO

>>53537495
>Build tokens

kek is that next to your imaginary $95 LINK tokens? Did Ari finish his 4th white paper yet?

>>53537557
>Cope and seethe, the post

kek, keep holding cuck. BTC $25k? LINK $7. BTC $30k? LINK $7. Let me see you squeal boy

What sucks most is that LINK pumps just as much as BTC it just dumps way harder and has to fight it's way back to where it was while BTC gets a new resistance.

>>53537660
I’m so fucking tired of Sergey and his silent indifference. From the beginning he truly did not make a difference, fucker is worth a small bank for accomplishing price feeds in almost a decade at link and nxt

>>53537849
this! He makes me so mad! I just wanted to climb up on that stage at SmartCon22 tell him off, grab and smash that precious laptop of his over his over his fat head haha that will teach him not to scam us

>>53537288
Which has performed better since September 2017 when I bought Chainlink? I honestly don’t know, I don’t pay much attention.

Its a saturnian bagholder death cult unironically.
>choose god of death
>surprised when your life turns to misery and your finances die

>>53537288
I own LINK
I own BTC as well

You didn't fall for that "all in" meme, did you?

>>53537288
>5 post by this ID.

Why the fuck do you sit at your PC and make post about dumb LINK holders ?
Get a fucking life anon.

>I don't hold link but I fud it for hours all day everyday.

>>53537288
Bitcoin dumped straight through over a week of support a few hours after Link staking launched.

>>53539111
kek why

I knew it was over then smartcon 2022 started and those hobos started banging on trashcans and breakdancing, it was in a way perfect, but I have to admit I cried like a baby. Feels so facking back to get scammed and then for the scammer to rub it in your face this hard

>>53540560
top kek

>>53540560
pic related, I even took screenshots because I couldn't believe it

>>53537288
Link staking(and arbitrum connection) was the biggest and longest running hopium psyop /biz has ever perpetrated.

>>53539111
> a week of support!

>>53540890
kek this
>muuuuuhhh heckling 5 minute timeframes!!1111

>>53537288
BTC was at 4k when link ico'd at 11 cents in September 2017
Congrats on the 6x, maxis!

>>53540890
>>53541150
Cope.

>>53541177
>DOGE was $0.00007 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>BNB was $0.50 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>QNT was $0.20 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>ADA was $0.02 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>GME was $3 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>AMD was $10 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>AAPL was 40 bucks when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>TSLA was 20 bucks when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>congrats on the x50 marines1!!

>>53541271
Imagine looking all that shit up just to """dunk""" on an asset you don't even like.

>>53541271
>GME
You have to go back.

>>53541290
imagine being hyper focused on a singular investment and always refusing to venture outside of your echo chamber
>>53541294
>nooooo you can't make money off a PnD
witness how triggered the shills get when you expose their bullshit

>>53541326
>imagine being hyper focused on a singular investment
Buddy, you're hyper focused on one of MY investments.

>>53541326
How are you exposing anything by sarcastically congratulating linkies on a x50 while GME did a x7 (yes, adjusted for split) in the same timespan? Are you actually this stupid?

>>53541331
how so? I demonstrated that multiple investments have outperformed yours in your specific cherry picked timeframe you always resort to
if anything, I'm actively steering the focus away from your heavy bags
>>53541347
>muh gme muh higher returns
ok what about every other investment I've listed?

>>53537302
You got yourself some wrong pussy anon go get useful faggot, as web3payment platform allow crypto users spend virtual assets just like traditional currencies. making it a sweet pussy experience

>>53541357
>how so?
Look at all the research you did >>53541271

>>53541364
and you can thank me for it
perhaps now you'll stop sperging out about muh ancient ICO gains from 6 years ago

>>53541367
It's so utterly bizarre to see you obsessing like this over Chainlink.
I've held many dozens of cryptos in the past 7 years, but I've never seen this type of dogged persecution.

Umm the price actually doesn't matter

>>53541357
>ok what about every other investment I've listed?
Like ADA? (x20) or AMD? (x8) Or AAPL? (x4) Or TSLA? (x9)
You are a giant fucking retard who spent a good chunk of their precious time looking up prices of assets at the time Chainlink ICO'd to dunk on some random Linkie, without doing actual due diligence to see if those assets outperformed Chainlink during that timeframe or not. Jesus fucking christ

>>53541401
>it's utterly bizarre how the entire board keeps shitting on my failing bags that I've been pushing nonstop for half a decade
it truly is anon, must be a conspiracy
>>53541407
you forgot DOGE, BNB, QNT

>>53541422
>you forgot DOGE, BNB, QNT
I did not forget them. Out of the 8 assets you listed, only 3 outperformed Chainlink. Does that make you a retard yes or no? I'd say yes, and your picks betray that you are a Redditfag who of the top of their head just listed the most prominent Covid-era meme stocks & crypto because in your head it sounded like they all went x1000.

>>53541407
Fucking KEK, half his list severely underperformed Link.

>>53541404
>The project doesn't matter

ftfy

>>53541446
no, I specifically all the top gainers of this cycle because they don't fit your cherry picked timeframes such as
>matic, ftm, sol, elrond, cosmos, shib, fil, theta, eth classic
>out of the 8 assets you listed, only 3 outperformed Chainlink
you also forgot to mention that all of them managed a much higher ROI than link measuring from the absolute bottom to the absolute top
kek

>>53541489
I specifically *omitted*

>>53541489
>all of them managed a much higher ROI than link measuring from the absolute bottom to the absolute top
source?

>>53541523
the chart
want me to start posting ROI? you're going to accuse me of "trying to hard" or some shit
you always have a million excuses kek

>>53541543
>the chart
"THE" chart?

>want me to start posting ROI?
Well yes.
You already messed up that first list you worked so hard on, show your work this time.

>>53541489
>you also forgot to mention that all of them managed a much higher ROI than link measuring from the absolute bottom to the absolute top
>all of them
Mate, just fucking calculate whatever you're claiming before actually spouting it. Why engage in futile pissing contests like this when you're not even sure about the claims you're making? For example, in your impressionable Reddit mind, it seemed like TSLA was the biggest play in the history of mankind when it caught your attention while scrolling the Reddit front page in 2020. But actually, from absolute bottom to ATH, TSLA did about a x300. Chainlink did a x500. AAPL did more, but you have to go back to the 80s and 90s for it to hit those numbers. GME barely hit a x20 going from ATL to ATH. AMD a x40.
>all of them
Apparently not. Always be careful with absolutes anon, you might lose arguments on anonymous imageboards.

>>53541642
kek so he moved the goalposts and STILL fucked it up yet again.

>>53541595
sure thing buddy
>TSLA 42,500%
>AAPL 63,300%
>AMD 304,350%
>DOGE 800,000%
>ADA 16,000%
>QNT 91.081%
>BNB 100,000%
>LINK 36,000%
I'll give you ada and gme lol
>>53541642
read and weep bro
>inb4 huuuur gotchu now ada and gme were worse lmaooooo

>>53541745
First you have to tell us where you put down the goalposts this time.

>>53541763
oh the irony
eat shit bro, you just got destroyed (again)
take a backseat and let your boyfriend (KWpeK/gT) handle this

>>53541777
Seriously, what are the dates you're using this time?
checked btw

Chainlink…THE cuckolds or crypto

Imagine being loyal to the man bankrupting you. Insane stockholm.

>>53537429
>dumps to $5

you see. the San Francisco salaries of hordes of HR roasties don't pay themselves.

>>53541789
>measuring from the absolute bottom to the absolute top

>>53541794
>>measuring from the absolute bottom to the absolute top
For Chainlink, that's from ICO to May 2021; around 52,000%

>>53541860
off by a factor of 10
you're not that good at math, are you pal
btw this chart is extremely generous cause it extrapolates the USD value based on the sats pair on binance, leading to many irregularities and extreme wicks that never actually happened
not to even mention that realistically, retail wasn't able to buy at the absolute bottom ever ($0.11) and that most of linkies bought in the $0.14-0.25 range

>>53541912
from $0.1 to $52.xx is rougly +52,000%.

>>53541924
measuring from each extreme wick nets us with a modest 46,000% and that's a huge stretch
congrats anon, you've managed to (theoretically) beat TSLA by thiiis much
lmao the absolute state of shills grasping at straws
btw KWpeK/gT why did you fuck off? I want to see what kind of excuses you'll come up with now

>>53541975
>measuring from each extreme wick nets us with a modest 46,000%
Anon, Chainlink's ICO price was about 10-11 cents.

>>53542003
anon, LINK's realistic ROI was ~36,000%, vast majority of retail didn't participate in the ICO and the absolute top you keep sperging on about lasted for not even an hour
touch grass and accept you lost
see ya in the next thread

>>53542025
>LINK's realistic ROI was ~36,000%
The ICO was about 10-11 cents, and ATH was a hair over $52.

That's roughly +52,000%.

>>53542003
>>53542055
>10-11 cents.
>he keeps lowering the entry price hoping nobody will notice
11, not 10-11
are you broken?

>>53541745
>Maybe if I switch to percentages instead of multiples they will think I was actually right
>TSLA 42,500%
That translates to x425 retard. STILL LOWER THAN CHAINLINK. Also please share sources because some of those claims are a total fabrication
>AMD 304,350%
Vastly outperforming even AAPL lmao. Sure thing bud.
>>53542025
The pilpul is off the charts lmaoooo

>>53542067
Jesus Christ anon, the presale was literally between 10 and 11 cents

>>53542102
>reeeeeeeeeeeeee at the very least TSLA is no par with LINK reeeeeee
>source??? source???? this is a total fabrication!!11
you're actually right, applying the same standards to AAPL nets us closer to 400,000% actually
>>53542132
shameless
it was $0.11, not "between" 10-11
LINK never had a $0.10 valuation under any circumstances
>desperately grasping at straws to portray LINK's gains on par with TSLA

>>53541271
>>>53541177
>>DOGE was $0.00007 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>BNB was $0.50 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>QNT was $0.20 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>ADA was $0.02 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>GME was $3 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>AMD was $10 when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>AAPL was 40 bucks when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>TSLA was 20 bucks when link ico'd at 11 cents in Sept 2017
>>congrats on the x50 marines1!!
jesus that list fuckn hurts.
not a link marine, i had 10k and sold them all at 20 and flipped it to BTC(12k at the time) and ether(300ish at the time)
i am grateful for this, i got in at 1.10 and sold at 20, so a 20x which I will take any day.

>>53542176
reeeeee demoralization tranny faggits this post is a LIE reeeeeeeee

link nuggets are the easiest retards to troll on /biz/. This is what happens when 90% of your bag holders are midwits that worship Chainlink god lmao. Sir gay isn’t even done dumping his bags yet. Every dogshit alt coin has rallied in this bear rally EXCEPT stink hahahahaha. Link is going to cost the price of a cup of coffee by the end of ‘23

>>53542102
here's your source coping faglord

Look at the cope in this thread when people come to terms that Bitcoin has literally gained $8000 a coin since staking came out, and Chainlink has been stuck in the mud. It's literally gone nowhere despite staking being called the great catalyst for a bull run.

>>53542169
Top fucking kek. You just have to harp on "muh Chainlink USD value at sats pair, muh wicks that never actually happened, muh realistically retail was never able to buy at $0.11" >>53541912
And then proceed to post an obvious EXTREME irregularity in AMD's stockprice in the FUCKING SEVENTIES and calculate from there. Fucking bravo, pil pul jew.

Face it, we bought Chainlink in presale for $0.11 and later on Etherdelta for $0.20. We netted a 500,000% to 250,000% increase on most of our buys. WE did that. Not some imaginary boomers in the 70s buying some AMD bottom, not AAPL founders who actually got in at the groundfloor and specially not (You) who is coping and seething on an anonymous imageboard with your lunch money portfolio, who missed literally all of the assets you posted. Good luck on catching the next big thing retard

>>53540560
>>53540628
This is the most funny and effective link fud, but those weirdos who spam link fud never use it? Why?

>>53542477
>muh wicks that never actually happened
the Binance sats to usd chart literally shows a top of $55 dollarinos you braindead clueless moron
>the generational AMD bottom was an irregularity bro
it wasn't, it was a market wide stock crash you uneducated shitcoin gambler
>FUCKING SEVENTIES
I told you, measuring these assets from absolute bottom to the absolute top completely obliterates the measly gains LINK has had
bottom to top means we disregard the timeframes, and you literally asked me to do that you imbecile
like I said, a million fucking excuses
>We netted a 500,000% to 250,000% increase on most of our buys
lol wut? are you on drugs anon? at the very best, you netted a 47,000% IF you only bought at the ICO
the absolute state of LYING pajeet shills

>>53542169
>LINK never had a $0.10 valuation under any circumstances
During the presale it was actually $0.09 fucking kek

Not only are you making a fool of yourself tripping over a single cent, but once again you got impaled by your own moving goalposts.

>>53542584
>comes out of the woodwork to spout more lies
>During the presale it was actually $0.09 fucking kek
source now

>>53537288
Link is performing like utter shit and anyone who says otherwise is a coping faggot

Fuck Sergey and his uselss roastie whores

>>53542539
>the Binance sats to usd chart literally shows a top of $55 dollarinos you braindead clueless moron
So? The USD chart shows $53 and yet you put $52 in your little calculator, because you're a pilpulling jew. Literally no one in the world cares about it not being a 500x "but akshually" a 480x, fag.
>it wasn't, it was a market wide stock crash you uneducated shitcoin gambler
So what? Not even your parents had the chance to catch that bottom, while I bought heaps of Chainlink in 2018.
>I told you, measuring these assets from absolute bottom to the absolute top completely obliterates the measly gains LINK has had
bottom to top means we disregard the timeframes, and you literally asked me to do that you imbecile
>and you literally asked me to do that you imbecile
HAHAHAHA. No. YOU started coming up with ATL to ATH because I proved to you that Chainlink outperformed 5 out of the 8 assets you posted since Chainlink ICO. That was the discussion. You moved goalposts so many times, you lost track of who did what. Un fucking believable. I seriously doubt you even know the correct steps of wiping your ass without moving a few goalposts first.
>lol wut? are you on drugs anon? at the very best, you netted a 47,000% IF you only bought at the ICO
You forgot about your moving goalposts again, didn't you anon? You wanted to talk about ATL to ATH, so that is what we are currently discussing. Look at you squirm, absolutely disgusting behavior.

>FUD poster btfo constantly yet they have to spam their little paragraph post to collect the wage

Sad

>>53542588
>source now
https://messari.io/asset/chainlink/profile/launch-and-initial-token-distribution

You can look it up for yourself too, the presale priced Link at 0.0003 ETH per Link, and ETH at that time was roughly $280 or something.

>>53542722
You're right on the last point by the way, I meant to type 50,000% to 25,000%, not 500,000% to 250,000%, but that much should be obvious by my previous replies.

>>53542722
>so?
So when you're calculating ROI even the slightest cent matters, seething midwit
>Literally no one in the world cares about it not being a 500x "but akshually" a 480x, fag.
but you do you massive sperglord, in fact, all of your arguments have been about that, you completely ignore how I btfo you when you kept begging me for calculations and ROI
cry harder
>HAHAHAHA. No. YOU
>>53541642
>Mate, just fucking calculate whatever you're claiming before actually spouting it.
was this someone else posting from your id? don't forget to respond in ALL CAPS
>you wanted to talk about ATL to ATH, so that is what we are currently discussing
for Chainlink that is translated to 47,000%, assuming you bought the absolute bottom and you sold the absolute top
where do you get your 500,000% quadrilion ROI figures? your ass?
>>53542766
https://coincodex.com/crypto/chainlink/
https://icodrops.com/chainlink/
https://cryptorank.io/ico/chainlink
weird, I could only find two other sources using that copypasted paragraph, while every other available source, including official CL sources, state $0.11
>https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/713y2a/potential_chainlink_ico_deception_chainlink/
here's the chainlink team engaging with reddit users about the ICO, nobody mentions anything about $0.09, but the "$0.11" is mentioned multiple times

>>53541745
This looks good but web3payments platform got me so freaky horny as I prefer to reverse stake
as I get cashback on all of my purchases with crypto.

>>53542864
>but you do you massive sperglord, in fact, all of your arguments have been about that, you completely ignore how I btfo you when you kept begging me for calculations and ROI
You got BTFO so thoroughly in this thread, even got caught red handed changing goalposts, and yet you manage to type this. Is this mental illness? Why are you seething so hard anyway? Chainlink had a decent run, not as good as ETH for example but a good chunk of this board managed to buy LINK between $0.09 and $1, which can't be said for many of the other assets listed. You listed some assets you thought did better than Chainlink starting from september 2017, turns out many of them didn't, by huge margins. Take the L and move on. What does it matter to you? You didn't catch Chainlink that low, you sure as hell didn't buy the COVID bottoms for AMD, TSLA, AAPL, let alone the generational pre 2000 bottoms. I seriously can't fathom the thought processes in your head that make you think you BTFO anyone but your self here.

>>53542864
>where do you get your 500,000% quadrilion ROI figures? your ass?
Everyone was measuring in multiples (x6 for BTC maxis, x20 for ADA, x4 for AAPL etc etc) and you suddenly switching to percentages (>TSLA 42,500% >AAPL 63,300% >AMD 304,350% >DOGE 800,000%) turned out to be a successful move, you tripped me up. Well done.

>>53542974
>If I sperg out as hard as I can it'll seem like I've won
nope
the original goal of me posting these other assets was to demonstrate that LINK's all time gains are severely overblown on this board and that plenty of other assets have outperformed LINK since it's ICO
I then stated that all of them have netted much higher all time ROI than LINK and you literally dared me to prove this by posting this load of shit
>>53541642
the only person constantly moving the goalposts is unironically you, constantly engaging in endless mental gymnastics
> COVID bottoms for AMD, TSLA, AAPL
who the FUCK even talked about the covid bottoms, you're literally delirious right now
bottom line is, LINK's gains are ABSOLUTE SHIT compared to the market it belongs to as well as other traditional investments
seethe and cope with your semantics

>>53542974
also I love how you keep harping on about muh multiples and muh percentages, as if these two variables are not the same fucking thing
I've used percentages for every asset, as you can see I clearly that LINK had a 36,000% ROI
you're only outing yourself as a midwit who literally gets confused by percentages and you think this is a 4d chess fud tactic

>>53543087
The only thing you proved is that link was a great asset to be in at the bottom, and its the only one that most people on this board were in and had a chance to be in at the bottom. Its like nerds complaining about some chicks pointy elbows. Link threads are so fucking gay now.

>>53542864
>nobody mentions anything about $0.09, but the "$0.11" is mentioned multiple times
That thread is from the time of the crowdsale, not the presale.

Pic is an email Chainlink sent to PREsale participants, he literally says presale buyers get a 20% discount compared to crowdsale buyers. And since we know the crowdsale was roughly $0.11, that means the presale was roughly $0.09

>>53543128
Chainlink got outperformed by:
>Dogecoin
>Shibainu
>Ethereum
>Solana
>Cardano
>AVAX
>Matic
>BNB

It's inflation adjusted price is $5.5 which is barely $1 more than 4 years ago. Anything else is pure cope

>>53543215
>QNT
>BNB
>DOGE
>b-b-but link was the only one!!!!
it wasn't and that propaganda you just spouted is the reason I keep posting
oh you mean the PREsale of which only a handful of whales managed to get in
>the ICO price bro
>no, not that price, I meant the ULTRA LOW SECRET PREsale price bro
who the FUCK is moving the goalposts now

>>53543266
>I meant the ULTRA LOW SECRET PREsale price
There was nothing secret about the presale, /biz/ was swapping pools all day long.

Also, you're whining about 1 fucking cent.

>>53543087
>the original goal of me posting these other assets was to demonstrate that LINK's all time gains are severely overblown on this board and that plenty of other assets have outperformed LINK since it's ICO
Uhh, is that what this post says? >>53541271
Looks to me like you are saying those assets outperformed LINK, starting from those price points. Why else would you specifically mention those price points at that specific date if you actually meant ATL to ATH?
>>53543087
>who the FUCK even talked about the covid bottoms
Me, because I know you picked those stocks because you read about them on Reddit during COVID. I also know you didn't catch them, which makes it even funnier when you use them to try and "dunk on" Linkies for their "meagre" gains.
>>53543128
>I've used percentages for every asset, as you can see I clearly that LINK had a 36,000% ROI
The first time you mentioned any kind of ROI, you said ">congrats on the x50 marines1!!" here >>53541271
I think we have established here that you are absolutely incapable of remembering whatever drivel you typed up in your previous posts, which leads me to believe you don't actually think before typing and hitting send in one of your rage fueled LINK FUD fits.

Have fun seething some more, it's no fun arguing with a literal retard.

>>53543266
checked
I didn't say it was the only one, I said it was the only one the majority of people bought at the bottom. If you bought qnt or bnb or doge at the bottom good for you, post buys or pnl, make a thread about it and you'll own this board forever. If not fuck off loser.

>>53538063
Kek anyone who falls for that narrative is retarded and doesn't deserve to make profits.
I'd never be balls deep in one coin
btc, link, eth, matic, ride and dxp I have them all, fully diversified across my favourite narratives >>53538063

>>53543291
okay bro you win here's the actual roi
>>53543314
>Uhh, is that what this post says?
yes
>Me, because my only weapon against the "fudders" is rampant projection
>The first time you mentioned any kind of ROI, you said ">congrats on the x50 marines1!!" here
because I kept the same ironic format to the post I responded to, holy fucking shit how dense are you>>53541177
>nooooo amd roi isn't that high, source me up daddy!!!1
keep squirming like the spineless worm you are, tranny faggot
>>53543331
>I didn't say it was the only one, I said it was the only one
and you were wrong, you weren't even here back then so stfu

>>53543366
checked
Oh you can't, surprise surprise.

>>53543412
>muh appeal to authority
what's your credentials you pretentious fuck? that you got in early on LINK and managed to hold all the way from 0.11 to 52? watch out bois, we got a financial guru here

>>53543431
Still waiting kek

>>53543483
for LINK to finally moon and your real life to begin?
keep waiting
btw I'm not going to bother responding unless you post your ICO buys and your sell orders close to the top

>my cunny threads get deleted instantly but this absolute shitfest stays up
its just not fair

i might buy chainlink i dont know what goes on in these threads but the more i see this token i know i need to buy it

>>53543343
Agreed, diversification is key if you actually want to make it.

isn't ride like the car and metaverse project?

>>53543508
28 high-effort posts by you obsessing over a very specific investment other people made.

Absolutely incredible.

>>53543701
22 low effort posts by you desperately trying to convince other people to buy your bags
really, what makes you better than me?

>>53543754
>you desperately trying to convince other people to buy your bags
I didn't do this once itt.
I'm talking about something I put money in. You're talking about things OTHER people put money in. They are not the same.

>>53543782
>>53543754
why dont u guys add each other on discord and duke it out, see where it leads

>>53541177

>>53543782
you're that insufferable conspiracy shill, why even try to deny this? >>53539111
>>53543798
I don't use discord, trannie

>>53543811
>you're that insufferable conspiracy shill
You've probably talked to literally hundreds of Linkies who posted pics like that, seeing how you're on here for hours every day discussing Chainlink.

>>53543582
that's the one, bringing vr gaming to cars and all of that shit
they won an award at CES event last month

>>53543865
>hahahaa no it's not me I swear

>ATH
That’s looking pretty far from now.
Hope anons managed to sell there or around there instead of holding all the way down. Would be really embarrassing.

>>53543998
I post pics like that from time to time. There is 1 autist that posts them very frequently. I know who you’re talking about, he has a distinct style

>>53542025
>he didn't perfectly time the bottom and top down to the minute

lmaoing at your life

>>53543582
Looking forward to another metaverse bull run; sandbox and apecoin could easily go bang

I can't understand these people. They sit here 24/7 spamming fud and hating on a coin they don't own? They have 0 financial investments in this token, yet they fud it for hours everyday? Or maybe they bought high and lost it all? I can't really understand why they do this or what their goals are. Do they want holders to sell or do they just want to demoralize holders? Or are they just "being silly and having fun with their friends while shitting on retarded holders"?

>>53543811
You should and talk to some real people instead, maybe make some friends

>ITT; a single autist is taking down an entire discord server all by himself
>inb4 more unhinged seething from third world shills
kek the tears itt are absolutely delicious

>>53543314
But youre a cuckold in a cult tho…you held and missed whole ‘21 bullrun. Thats why youre so unhappy. Link will never run again. Ouch

>>53544318
>discord is the place you make true friends
kek, that's what you want us to believe, don't you?

>>53544304
Theyre so in your head you sit around 24/7 trying to diagnose them. Youre extremely rattled. I can fee you shaking while you post. You want to imply they are losers, but so are you. And youre in a cuckold cult

>>53544386
>youre in a cuckold cult
And you're in a cuckold cult revolving around cuckold cultists.

>>53543508
Took a shower, walked the dog, got lunch, still nothing. Come on anon infinite bragging rights, it was so easy to buy bnb or doge at the bottom, you did it right?

>>53544715
>bragging rights
you first
>Took a shower, walked the dog, got lunch, still no poompa
stay strong anon, singularity is nigh

>>53543314
This. Linkfags are completely delusional with severe confirmation bias.
>no linkers are seething cause were up 5% today
>meanwhile every other coin is up 10%

i bought some link guys. it took a bit, but all these poster crying about link seem to be onto something, you can tell it’s just too forced

>>53546017
I just sold my link guys the shilling seems very inorganic

>>53542614
Hey thats the Italian FUDcuck, hey nigger you still eating those Pills and posting about Nigger dicks on /int/?
Still a NEET with no income and less than 6000 LINK?
LMAO

>>53545991
Is this seriously your poorfolio? Kek

>>53546306

>>53542169
Don't forget there was a presale bonus, giving you an effectively lower price. It was more like 9 cents.

>>53546583
>month ago
Damn it’s over, just sold 100k

>>53546755
The performance is up to date for feb 1st
>bear market coin
>pumps the least

>>53537288
Sergey holds most of the tokens, and he dumps and shorts his own token, he hates you and doesn't want you to make it.

>>53537288
>Imagine posting your LINK staking gains in 2023
11 months left, shouldnt say that yet

>>53546205
>>53546205
>>53546205
this
>>53542614
>>53542614
>>53543262
>>53543262
PIC RELATED
ITS HIM

>>53537493
Link and it's followers are one of the better memes in crypto so I doubt they will

>>53544271
Get you ass ready for the bullrun not hoping on the it dickhead as i make more money in real estate? For me when buying properties I pay with cryptocurrency through any of the web3payments services and receive a cashback of up to 1.5%, which is just like a juicy pussy anon

Summary of linkie life. Also being a cuck

>>53550317
this is the currynigger

>>53542188
Thankfully its real.
Its one of the very few times i took profits and didnt ride down -99%

>>53541912
I bought link at .13 cope seethe

>>53537419
so far, you got negative income

>>53552358
>he's here to gloat about people losing money on scams
>no wait he's just here to shit talk LINK tik toker SHIT
OKGMLMAONIGGERS

>>53547078
Sergey won't allow unstaking until he has dumped the price into the dirt.

>>53537456
lol they keep trying to push the random alcoholic drug addict from twatter and his babydick folio
>>53546583
>>53545991
what makes fudcucks turn out to be such massive losers every single time? it's so weird

>>53552444
it's not about link, he's ignoring the absolute numbers and falling into the classic retail trap of letting losers run. link holders seem to be especially vulnerable to the tricks that are designed to disincentivize making the right choice though

>>53552811
Calm down bro I bought the latest VC scam. I'm on your side. You can rug me now.

>>53552811
Checked. Any particular reason you decided not to check the trips you’re replying to?

>>53552928
OH NO NO NO GOTTEM

>>53550657
Hate to break it to you, im white, tall, tower over little bitch made betas like you, etc. Guys like you roll hard on the keyboard, but in real life, you’d look away real quick if we locked eyes. Like I said, bitch made.

>>53553228
u aint shit nigger

>>53553228
>yeah bro im a tall towering alpha male that spends 10 hours a day obsessing and seething over a token that i don't hold and i would never go on the internet and lie
meanwhile your reality is pic related