/biz/ - Business & Finance

So far away from having a working product that you are going to miss the bull entirely if you put a substantial amount into it.

Yea I get that it's a fresh project, but the info they were posting about it seemed interesting and it had more info about the devs behind it. I wasn't trying to look for any hopium or anything like that

It is an ai thing??

>>53483081
Seems more of a decentralized/security oriented project. I read the medium on their site but some of it flew over my head.

>>53483341
im just buying it because I saw it here and on twitter this morning
its so low MC whatever... ill buy 0.07% of the total supply and maybe itll make me $10k maybe i lose $200

>>53483559
where can you buy?

>>53483571
contract is at the bottom of their page

>>53483664
im not going to that sketch balls link

>>53483559
That's kind of how I look at it atm. It doesn't seem like some jeet pump n dump scam which is why I want to look more into it. The dev seems to be realistic and open about the project as well. It's not often that legit projects pop up on here before they've already pumped.

>>53483672
https://coinmarketcap.com/dexscan/ethereum/0xdb4a17ee208f7e7e35f6af0ee3cc72e307322821

Which one of you just did this?

>>53482845
How often do these shilled projects make it? Or do they crash and burn.

I'm so bored with crypto lately, I bought some just for the excitement.
If it becomes a top 1000 shitcoin ($0.08) I'll be up 19x
If it becomes a top 500 shitcoin ($0.39) I'll be up 93x
if it becomes a top 200 shitcoin ($1.63) I'll be up 382x
>but anon you baka that's not how you gage an investment
I know I don't care I miss the 2021 BSC shitcoin casino and I haven't gambled, not once, in 2022.

>>53483825
Most go to 0.
Just take your profits when you are up 10x.
Make sure to check the price constantly.
Better yet, set a price notification as soon as one is available if you don't have the tools to get one automatically from the uniswap price.

There's no way all that volume is just from posting this shit here...

Damn, I'm already 2x.

This is very curry smelling.

>>53483850
Thanks anon. I’ll try my luck in getting in and out early.

>>53482845
i saw this and I straight up do not understand what the fuck they are building at all. it almost seems like some kind of satire (decentralized message verification or some shit, it sounds like something ethereum is already capable of)

that being said I bought some because its twitter was being followed by a couple people I know who are smart/whales and it only has a few hundred followers.

>>53484177
I remember some of the shill posts that the OP is talking about. The people involved with this are legit. It was posted in a "whats the next 1000x" type of thread about a week ago but I can't be arsed in trying to find it.

>>53484219
Its one of these:
https://identitymanagementinstitute.org/zero-knowledge-identity-proof/
There are a couple coins like these making the rounds already. So it might fizzle out and die in the next few months. I'm sure the devs have a lengthy explanation about how they are different but frankly I'm just gambling.

Word to the wise, don't fomo into this after it just did a +100% pump. I personally think this is a legit project and I only started this thread to get more info on it and it's devs. If you want to buy into it, wait for it to come back down to high 002s, low 003s

Is it actually confirmed that the dev is that spotify guy or is it just a random claim?

Their logo is a square on its corner? Really pushing the envelope there.

>>53484637
They hired a Spotify guy. Spotify guy isn’t the owner I think. I guarantee you 90% of people here are their TG shills.

>T.seen their telegram group

>>53483825
most go to zero, but GNS was one that I saw
many of them are scams that will do well because of cool and vague marketing (so sell atleast your initial after a reasonable return)
but if you have conviction that the project is legit and will be sucessful hodl till you feel its overvalued
as its on ETH really not worth throwing less than $250 on this IMO

>>53484773
thanks for the note
Im sad I didn't drop more on tit cause I got at 0.3 cents
but so it goes, tempting to take out my initial

>>53484959
Did you mean more than?
Not to turn this into a blogpost, but It would be nice to have a middle man between the devs and people like us (me) to answer questions and help dumb things down. A lot of these guys have a habit of doing devspeak when explaining things that are already confusing to begin with. Unlike other coins, this dev seems to be pretty chill which is nice but I don't want to keep pushing him with dumb shit so I just sit by and see how it all plays out.