/biz/ - Business & Finance

When the flying fuck are we going to move up? I was promised generational wealth.

>>53426983
Two (2) more weeks

>>53426936
BLLG CHADS WE'RE GONNA MAKE IT

Went from 0.31 to 0.37 during the duration of the last thread alone. Fuck everyone who fudded it and called it a scam.

>https://cdn.mises.org/Property,%20Freedom,%20and%20Society%20Essays%20in%20Honor%20of%20Hans-Hermann%20Hoppe_2.pdf
just in case an anons wanna learn about the logical conclusion of human action to preserve human inaction, i leave you this link above and picrelated attached

Good morning sirs
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/indian-silver-imports-set-record-2022

>>53426073
>we would live in a deflationary, eternally recession proof economy, because recessions and depressions entirely happen due to malinvestment caused by artificially cheap access to credit at the Central bank's dime
And this isn't just theoretical. US gilded age was pretty much this. Things kept deflating and poorfags became middle class by the end because their savings just afforded them all the luxury of middle class lifestyle.

>>53427055
Good morning benchod
Also yes, the Gilded Age is precisely what I was referring to there.

>>53426936
F

>>53427010
i called it a scam because it was pumped by silverjew. if im wrong, as i often am, then i hope that you guys are rewarded copiously for your patience.
anyone who wants to, in current year plus fifteen, take their lumps and pangs of uncertainty to the bank 100 fold then they deserve it. and then some
i saw silverjew and his lingering bait as a fishing lure fr fr no cap. but the bait isnt always where the hook is...food for thought

>>53427050
"the logical conclusion of human action to preserve human inaction" sounds like the prelude to an ancom ideal of post scarcity. That's exactly what I was referring to in our argument in the previous thread. There's nothing wrong with individuals wanting to spend less time at work, but to paint that as a logical systematic conclusion is asinine.

>>53427010
just noticed you have a glowing green id again
just noticed

>>53427136
so the logical conclusion is to innovate for *checks notes* more human action?

>>53427150
wdym "again", I had an orange one last time

>>53427177
im colorblind. plus im retarded. you wouldnt pick on a colorblind retard would you anon?

>>53427185
>wins internet argument
>loses money
great job?

>>53427245
elaborate. i beg you

>>53427255
absolutely not

your incredible and unique insights into the workings of finance will make you super rich any day now.

any day now.

>>53427289
thanks bob. i hope you die with the most stuff and the least amount of leisure time. or perhaps you will strike a balance by labeling one as inferior while also holding it steadfastly
>im rich i can afford vacations
thus proving my point. im smarter than you bob. admit it and there will be an end to the horror

>>53427335
>there will be an end to the horror
If I found you guys anything other than amusing I wouldn't religiously read everything you post year after year.
/cmmg/ is my sunday comics.

bob is our lowkey lolcow
>im rich
married a van ness
>i bought when it was low
see above
>i did the underwriting for xy and z
ultimate boomtastic cope

your generational wealth will be depleted in 50 years because of the weak willed faggotry you endorse
you reap as you have sown

>>53427401
like most rich people I don't believe in generational wealth outside of DNA.

every few weeks one of you steps in and announces they've finally figured out that the whole deal was bullshit all along, and they're not going to wait another 3 years to probably not get rich.

I like to think some of those announcements are sincere, and they came from people that in the past thought they "won" internet arguments against me. Not because I'm vindictive, but because I like when people learn things. Stuff I mostly learned the hard way myself.

>>53427255
Why are you posting this womans pic? Relevance?

>>53427422
>/biz/ is one person
this is the weakest strawman ive seen from you bob. i feel pity and only pity

>>53427475
He's making sure I know who he is. Which of course I do.
>>53427491
I didn't say that. I said the opposite.

but one day /cmmg/ will be down to three people, and they'll be the same three we started with.

>>53427520
i dont deny this. on the long view. eventually, all things considered equally, yes the beat will go on.
im betting the beat will not go on because of my clearly stated investment thesis...the govt is wrong and evil
so fuck you. we should go fishing once muh rig is done. i want to torture you into telling me the bestest routes north of gunnison and south of glenwood. i wont leave this world without taking one of those elk

>>53427551
>i want to torture you into telling me the bestest routes north of gunnison and south of glenwood
you don't gotta torture me for that. I mean there's really only a couple ways to go, and they're both amazing.

>>53427475
floy was at the rio conference in rio 92. she was my mentor

>>53427579
played out. you know it too

>>53427609
theres a road northbound from the western slope just outside of gunnison. i have the map. its lost but i have it. ive x country ski'd up to that mine site. we didnt find it cuz snow or whatever. but weve discussed this mine site
its a pass they take north of monarch? or collegeant peaks?
im going to take one of those elk. im building a rig to do that and more

>>53427642
Yeah, Sandy Hook Mine. Old lost gold mine that was later found.

So is Red shot by a pit bull or what?

>>53427669
i figured you ordered the hit

>>53427677
yeah like three years ago
that dog never listens to me

>>53427669
ok so i bought the onx hunting app. i m using it to scout. yeah. scout...
the roads arent clearly defined but i know theres a trail between monarch and the collegiant peaks that is a corridor for these primo elk. i m not a poacher like you think. i bend the rules sometimes, maybe

>>53427693

nigger

>>53427388
Well at least there's that. I have that as my minimum goal in life

>>53427520
I count five or so. Maybe seven

>>53427669
What?

>>53427669
>>53427677
You've activated my paranoia

Bob is the nigger of cmmg

>>53428197
hey me too :)

https://ceo.ca/@businesswire/canagold-announces-agreement-with-taku-river-tlingit

Canabros, the indigenous are onboard.

Natty broes, are you ok?
2
TWO
II
$2 HANDLE
you were warned

EMO broes, how was the Koolaid?

/CMMG #1 pick

>>53429589
>>53429612
>>53429634
>you're all the same guy
Now that makes sense.

>>53426936
goooood mythical morning

>>53429589
>>53429612
>>53429634
I don't hold any of those but damn nigga you're really invested in the suffering of others.
I love a bit of bantz but you really live and breathe this stuff, the most negative poster ITT by far. Stop spending so much time in /smg/.

>>53429682
>Now that makes sense.
Very sensible. I didn't blow my $ on /cmmg picks.

>>53429699
>invested in the suffering of others
Nope.
I warned of these and more, but they didn't want to listen to reason. Instead they ridiculed me. Greed and emotion got the better of them. Too fucking bad.

>>53429798
>I warned of these and more, but they didn't want to listen to reason.
My nigga your gas "reason" was just posting "buy KOLD". I think you were challenged once or twice but damn it was mostly just the same post, hardly thorough analysis. You were right but I rarely remember you ever elaborating on it or being shit on enough to warrant being this mad.

As for the horse that's the biggest offender. I've seen maybe a single person ITT who actually still holds that shit anymore. The horse is dead and the cult has disbanded. No one here cares about Bayhorse more than you it seems. You're at worst screeching into a tunnel, at best preaching to the choir. It's the equivalent of getting into a street fight then returning to the same street weeks later to shit talk the air and wave your fists around despite there being no one there to hear it. Flogging a dead horse has never been more appropriate.
Even Lassen doesn't get mad about it and he took more personal flak than anyone. I can undertand the NatGas flex because it was recent at least, but you are the only one still invested in fucking Bayhorse. Let it go dude.

>>53430065
I won the fight and now I will gloat.
Also, you should have bought KOLD.
Seethe moar.

>>53430065
>your gas "reason" was just posting "buy KOLD"
My reason was simple. When price rises, more production comes online. It was inevitable. It didn't need a convoluted justification, like "G won't supply the COMEX," etc.

>>53430109
>uh oh grandads going off on one again about that fight he had in college
Like I said I get having a bit of fun about the KOLD posting at least because it's recent, even if your "fight" was two (you)s that one time, but damn lad it'll be 2030 and you'll still be here swinging at shadows posting the same tired images, gloating to people about bayhorse who don't give a fuck about fucking bayhorse.

>Also, you should have bought KOLD.
And you should have bought sand. Did you? No? Who gives a fuck? I'm not your enemy I'm just bored of your posts.

>>53430065
The fact is that most (I'd guess 95%) people don't do any research before they buy some company that's promoted here. Rather they just hit the offer and hope for a moonshot because others are positive. Degenerate gambling won't get you anywhere, as this board proves.
Now, if you will excuse me, the markets open soon and I have money to make. Good luck.

>>53430331
>The fact is that most (I'd guess 95%) people don't do any research before they buy some company that's promoted here. Rather they just hit the offer and hope for a moonshot because others are positive. Degenerate gambling won't get you anywhere, as this board proves.
I couldn't agree with you more buddy. That's why I hate spoonfeeders and shill me posts as I've made very clear in my raging over the past few threads, which you backed me up on yourself.

Good morning all how are things!

Scottie had another fantastic set of results!
https://www.juniorminingnetwork.com/junior-miner-news/press-releases/2659-tsx-venture/scot/135058-scottie-resources-intercepts-34-5-g-t-gold-over-4-7-metres-on-blueberry-contact-zone.html

Do you guys follow any news letters? Paid or free? Just curious more than anything, I'm really awful about keeping on top of the markets.

>>53431638
Gary savage posts here daily so don't buy his subscription. Hell let you know the nuggets of wisdom

>>53431638
I pay 75 pieces of toilet paper/60ish good boy points a month for Gary's choicest nugs but that's it.

>>53432495
kek that timing.

Speaking of whom, even Gary is saying to be wary of Nat Gas and its long term support of $1.50
Sorry Nat Gas sisters, hope some of you listened to my trendlines instead of getting bullish at the sight of a single green candle.

>>53432537
When to buy natgas?

>>53432537
I'm not touching it until a clear reversal or it hits the 1.50 support

>>53432594
meant for >>53432554

I have a small position left in Trillion but that's faith in the company rather than the gas itself.

>>53432616
I asked about trillion a few weeks ago since I was curious how all this bearish natgas sentiment would affect them and was told that all this doesn't apply to them since they use a different price or some shit for being in turkey. They just released December revenues and from how the CEO talks everything is fine apparently.

>>53432881
Previously they were using Botas pricing, which I believe used a moving average of TTF prices calculated per month. Now apparently it has shifted to some kind of (partial?) hedge but the monthly revenues don't go into details. Maybe by next financials it'll be clear.

Basically I'm buying 15 or so junior miners that have been shilled here and waiting a year for them to go up.
Good strategy?

How do I get exposure to ZR without buying an entire contract of it?

Wtf is uranium gonna do? Someone smarter than me tell me because I don't want to screw up and sell right before a pump again

>>53433275
That's literally what everyone here is doing.

Polymetal is moving its stock listing to the Astana international exchange in Kazakhstan. What are the implications for my ADR shares?

>ctrl f "Fission"
>0 results
NGMI

Even more hydrogen news https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2023/01/24/zero-emission-hydrogen-production-facility-planned-for-california/

the articles are almost becoming daily. Might be time to start researching tickers friends.

>>53433424

Personally I believe it's going to go down before it goes up and it could even be a 5 year time frame where it takes a breather.
I've said couple of times before that I think the U stocks just got caught in a mania and ran really hot, but the real thesis will play out only when it absolutely has to.

I've been recently looking into hydrogen, green energy and the West investing into Africa and pushing their green policy there to combat Chink investments and at no point has nuclear been talked about.
It's all about wind and solar when it comes to green energy and future hydrogen production.
Nuclear simply doesn't seem to be on the agenda with these green malthusian fucks, which leads me to think it's not going to get the push until it's too late.
After all if we don't have nuclear, then wind and solar are going to print money along with fossils becoming super expensive, which plays perfectly into the hands of everyone invested in those fields.
Combine that with the massive inevitable human stupidity involved in this and it's clear we're not going to see a push for nuclear until they simply have to admit that the green politics failed.
It's good to keep in mind that the elites want everyone to lower their living standards and keeping energy tight and expensive is part of that agenda. Nuclear making energy abundant goes against that entire picture.

Really I think they'll only go hard into nuclear when China has radically more energy production than the West and we have to catch up to them quickly.
I'm nowhere near as bullish on nuclear as most people, because from what we have seen there's an unnatural amount of resistance against nuclear from the higher ups.
SMRs might be when nuclear finally starts getting more real interest, because those are way smaller projects.

>>53433690

Yeah that field is going from 0 to 100 really damn quickly.

>>53433690
I made a 2x off of PLUG last year. It's primed for a rebound. Staying out for now, rolled my gains into uranium. Cali is the only state with hydrogen refueling stations. WA and OR getting first stations this year. Want to buy a Toyota Mirai.

>>53433795
>until they simply have to admit that the green politics failed
Except you can get solar power from empty deserts for less than 2c/kwh, convert it to LNG which apparently is feasible to store for some time as it has become very popular and is shipped over long distances.
How is this going to fail again? solar power from sunny deserts is cheaper than all fossil fuels.

>>53433974

It's going to fail because Chinks are going to outdo the West in energy production through vastly more powerful and far more efficient nuclear sector.
It all comes down to scaling and the competition is going to kick West's ass by building far more compact and simpler solutions compared to massive amounts of wind and solar that require energy storage and transportation systems that are another huge sector that needs to be built.
Energy needs in practical terms are infinite and you can't keep on scaling up the wind and solar sector with anywhere near the ease you can do with nuclear. Nuke plants don't require batteries, hydrogen or LNG solutions to store the energy, nor do they require a pipeline or gas terminals to be built to transfer that energy.
Which is why SMRs are going to be the winner in the long run as they're way smaller and cheaper, but before those are available the West is going to try and compete with renewables and will keep on funding the energy storage solutions to make them more viable.
There's tons of money to be made in renewables, but on mass energy production level they are a stopgap solution.
Eventually the West will have to admit that we've already had the best form of energy production for ages and it's needed in order to compete with the guys who are using nuclear on a massive scale and who are able to quickly build it locally without any massive energy transfer systems other than electric wires.

>>53434314
Mucho texto and mucho theoretical. Meanwhile in reality solar is cheaper than nuclear, at least in the west it is very much cheaper. And today we don't have infinite energy demand, we can cover our entire energy needs with just a fraction of the desert used for solar energy.
Infrastructure needs to use more hydrogen (meant hydrogen and not LNG in my last post too, can't convert electricity to LNG) isn't a big deal I think as I assume you can burn the stuff using the same plants that now burn natural gas now.
Nuclear energy really does cost like 10c/kwh in the west, look it up. Solar power is <2c/kwh from very sunny areas.

>>53433819
I was looking into plug and bloom yesterday. Was wondering what a good entry point would be.

>>53434464
Look at this map and click legend to see the scale. You can get 2kwh/y per 1W of installed solar power in places like Spain and SW US. 1W of solar panels is only $0.3, you can buy it and have it installed for less than $1/W (utility scale). So that is more than 2kwh/y for every $1 invested. The panels last 20-30 years and there is little maintenance.
I have never heard a uranium investor actually talk about the numbers.

https://globalsolaratlas.info/map?c=19.269665,-37.96875,4

>>53426936
I'm sorry, but the dog looks guilty as hell.

>>53433509
Nothing. They are worthless unless they're on moex

>>53434691
I think they are even assuming rather conservative conversion effeciency of the solar panels. Tech has been improving significantly over the years.
Look at this power purchase agreement signed, I'm pretty sure it's unsubsidized. 1c/kwh. That's in Saudi Arabia, one of the most optimal locations and they have cheap labour too ofc. But still, 1c/kwh.

https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/04/08/saudi-arabias-second-pv-tender-draws-world-record-low-bid-of-0104-kwh/

>>53434691
Lets see you talk about the numbers then. As wind and solar increases, so does frequency deviations in the grid. How can we ever build and depend on such unreliable production?
https://twitter.com/BurggrabenH/status/1567929396824088579

>>53434691

I'm not an uranium investor, I invest into whatever makes money and at the moment I see renewables as more viable money making vehicle over nuclear.
But long term this isn't the case, nuclear simply scales way better than solar or wind, it's not even a competition. For every nuke plant you need to build like 3 million panels in optimal locations and they're still going to be intermittent form of energy without the large scale energy storage solutions.
And solar does require maintenance. Solar in desert suffers 0.4-0.8% loss daily caused by dust and if this isn't cleaned up in a day, the sand is going to permanently stick into the panels.
Sand storm fucks 60% of the yield from the panels in an instant.
How many million panels can the farms be scaled up to until the daily maintenance starts becoming a massive factor in production?

According to that map it would only make sense to build mass scale solar into Europe if we could fill Spain with tens of millions of panels and then transfer the energy north.
You can't do this kind of mass transfer system through nations anywhere that doesn't have absolute local stability, which is basically the entirety of Africa.
Not to mention the amount of panels needed is absolutely retarded in number.
China is building 150 nuclear reactors, there's no realistic way to build as many panels to match that energy production. We can't build three hundred million solar panels to compete that. That's a hard fact and no one can convince me otherwise.
My ideas about this lean into the practicality of things on a world wide scale and the exponential scaling issues that come from it. One solution is viable and the other isn't.
And energy needs are basically unlimited.
We're not even meeting the current energy needs comfortably and places like Africa and India are modernizing fast, basically doubling the energy consumption of the entire planet even without any kind of population growth.

>>53435093
It doesn't have to be that way. Seems like RE production outpaced storage capacity that is needed to smooth out the supply curve. Which isn't surprising as energy storage has been pretty expensive until recently, just like renewable energy was much more expensive 10 years ago. But the tech is evolving and the prices are coming down. Look up the price chart of lithium batteries for example. They are also working on lots of other different battery technologies that are cheaper for long term storage than lithium batteries that are more suitable for electronics and cars. Flow batteries for example. We are also storing energy by pumping water up mountains. They are working on a lot of different ways to do it. Storage of liquid hydrogen could probably work too for some time.

Based Graeme working hard to create shareholder value

>>53435233
>And solar does require maintenance. Solar in desert suffers 0.4-0.8% loss daily caused by dust and if this isn't cleaned up in a day, the sand is going to permanently stick into the panels.
It can be automated. From what I've seen maintenance is not that expensive.
>According to that map it would only make sense to build mass scale solar into Europe if we could fill Spain with tens of millions of panels and then transfer the energy north.
You can get a good yield in the other southern European countries too, but even if we just use Spain that's no problem. We only need a fraction of Spains desert area to cover our energy need.
>China is building 150 nuclear reactors, there's no realistic way to build as many panels to match that energy production. We can't build three hundred million solar panels to compete that. That's a hard fact and no one can convince me otherwise.
How is it a hard fact that because number big it's impossible lol? Jinko Solar, which I believe is the biggest manufacturer, shipped 42GW in 2022 and module capacity just reached 70GW. Check out this chart of the exponential growth of solar module production
https://www.statista.com/statistics/668764/annual-solar-module-manufacturing-globally/

Look at this article
https://www.solarpowereurope.org/press-releases/world-installs-a-record-168-gw-of-solar-power-in-2021-enters-solar-terawatt-age

>The global solar market is growing exponentially. It took around a decade for world-wide solar capacity to reach 1 TW, from 100 GW in 2012. In just 3 years, SolarPower Europe predicts global solar to more than double to 2.3 TW in 2025.
>2.3 TW represents twice the gross electricity production of France and Germany combined.

Also this
>39% of the capacity added to the U.S. electrical grid in the first half of 2022 was from solar.

We are already getting close to the capacity needed to roll over the entire electricity generation capacity to renewables over the next 25 years.

UUUU chugging along, $7.34 today. Multi month high.

Encore announced offerings and took a 8% hit. Azincourt creeping up from the dead

PAN MAN, am I onto something here?

>>53436365

>>53436365
>>53436383
thats some interesting looking quartz! i cant tell from the shots if there is any sulfides in that material. If you can, break the rock in half, keep half and grind down the other into dust. Pan the dust and see what shows up! You might be pleasantly surprised!

>>53436645
Thanks for the tip. I licked it and now I have a metallic taste in my mouth. I used a magnifying glass and think I see some sphalerite in there.

>>53436767
it is vuggy, is the dark material on the bottom host rock or darker rust stained vein? Was this pulled off a rock face or as float?

>>53436989
The underside is muddy, crusty stuff. This was busted right off a cave wall.

>>53437270
yea crush and pan, its the easiest way to see anything trapped inside.

>>53437459
Will do. Thanks PM.

>>53430985
God darnn. Really frustrating not being able to buy that.

>>53431638
Yes we follow a lot and discuss them here.

>>53432616 they sell gas at Turkish price of $30 per mcf and this is a retarded headwind for this company that dumb fucks think they're getting us prices. Completely unnecessary obstacle for this company.
T

>>53433795
Well. Thanks. I guess I'll think about it. I guess I stupidly had hoped I'd be some sort of uranium millionaire. Damn I became like a GME holder. Or the new BBBY holders. Take care friend.

>>53435279
Large scale energy storage is always less economical than more turn-key production. Storage has been the bane of RE forever and will continue to be because it isn't cost effective for the utilities. Gov't loves to subsidize the fuck out of wind and solar, but it really isn't helping the grid with how intermittent they can be.

>gold is absolutely exploding upwards
>I'm getting $30k payment in 2 months from now so I can't invest anything yet

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

>>53438003
https://www.google.com/search?q=cost+of+lithium+batteries+chart&sxsrf=AJOqlzXSJrKHrGmwfXXq_w4Xo39jd_RD9g:1674689843530&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiQ0e3p8eP8AhWSX_EDHYgGDZQQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1920&bih=937&dpr=1#imgrc=kaVJinNFv6kVwM

>>53438003
Hydro electric does it just fine and has for literally centuries now. I realize this is not the same as storing energy in a battery or whatever else
Sun don't always shine and wind don't always blow, but water always runs downhill
>Govt subsidies
Why don't they just burn money to generate power

>>53435093
The greentardation intensifies when you take into account their tendency to freak out about ever-increasing bouts of unpredictable weather.. then why the hell would you want an already intermittent source (in the best of times) that’s reliant on such a volatile input?

This is completely avoidable with gas, coal, and nuclear.

If gold goes back to 2000 and beyond soon, do you think there is going to be a frenzy'd rush into miners like Gary Savage says?

btw I'm loving the Austrian econ love in these threads, keep it up

>>53439005
It's already starting. Look at junior explorers this month already. It's more than a rebound from tax-loss selling. Broadly, non-producing gold and silver explorers are up over 20% so far this year. Even some illiquid turds are catching a bid.
I've opened a new account just to play shitcos. During the last run-up, even dormant shells went 5x.

>>53439163
>I've opened a new account just to play shitcos. During the last run-up, even dormant shells went 5x.
So basically you're telling me it's literally free money?
Thought so.
I took out debt to invest in this bull market.
Lets see if I fucked up life up or will retire young.

>>53439003
i am wondering how fast the greta types will be out and about when SMRs start getting seriously built in different parts of north america. Their perfect for many heavy industrial sites, including oil and gas. Nuclear is the future and SMRs will lead that charge, but the green cult will never except nuclear.

>>53439325
>So basically you're telling me it's literally free money?
Not at all. For me it's a calculated risk contingent on money flowing into the sector. I understand that my shitco account could go to $0.

>>53432554
Anon, there are many rich oilmen but not many rich gasmen. There is a reason for this.

>>53439163
What are the indicators you look for to know when to buy and sell? I'm more of a sit and wait kinda investor but I could risk a couple k swinging if I knew how to do it safely

>>53439412
So yeah it's basically free market, sweet.

>>53439412
Sooooo basically you're saying it's free money?

>>53426936
Of course it is a pitbull but when you look at this article up on the New York times They put a German Shepherd to try to trick you.

It was. A Pitt. Bull.

>>53439751
Buy low, sell high. I like out-of-favor companies that aren't pumped and have good value. I don't use technical analysis much. I think it's mostly garbage, especially for low-liquidity stocks. I might make a mental note of increasing volume, or look at a chart to guage sentiment. Judging sentiment is a subjective task, and relies a lot on your perspective. I watch about 100 companies fairly closely and have become used to judging market sentiment, both on an individual company basis and for the sector as a whole. It takes a lot of time and effort to sift through all the paperwork and noise.

>>53439981
The dog stepped on the gun and it fired. It’s got nothing to do with the aggressiveness of the breed so not sure what point you’re trying to make.

>>53439372

am i the only one terrified of a bunch of micro reactors around the world? won't these be prime targets for terrorists or false flag ops?

>>53440219
SMRs are pretty simple and safe. To add to that, nuclear sites are pretty secured as is, these stations will get the same amount of security. Just because their smaller doesnt mean their treated any differently.

>>53433795
>>53434314
>>53435093
Based anons who intuitively understand economics of scale and laugh at the delusional new age techno optimist in the thread.
>>53435233
Checked and based. Why the hell did nobody check this, we're really going downhill fr fr no cap.
>>53433974
>>53434464
>>53434691
>>53435071
>>53435279
>>53435678
Nice cope but unfortunately muh technological advances in solar panels will not save you from the inevitability of retvrning to Diesel's original invention (with a hydrogen twist), and the old reliable nuke. Something that wasn't mentioned in this argument thus far which I find peculiar given the nature of the thread, is the impossibility of producing solar panels at scale over and over again every two decades due to a severe bottleneck in the amount of rare metals we have available on Earth, period. And this is the monstrous gigantic elephant in the room that everyone has conveniently sidestepped for some reason.
>>53439003
Based fellow coal, gas and nuclear enjoyer. I've mentioned over the past few threads that my biggest holdings are aussie coal and I truly believe the top is still far away from now on that front. I wish anons here would talk about it more.

>>53426936
Is the dog's remembered as such, or the shot-ee?

>>53426936
What the fuck is this red dog thing and is this unironically feds covertly putting a hit on my life?

WHERE THE FUCK IS THE FUCKING BOTTOM ON NAT GAS. JESUS CHRIST. I TRIED TO KNIFE-CATCH AGAIN 48 HOURS AGO AND IT ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT STOP. FUCK FUCK FUCK. SOMEONE EXPLAIN FUNDAMENTALLY HOW THIS FUCKING SHIT CAN SUDDENLY BE AT A 2-YEAR FUCKING LOW AFTER BEING AT A DECADE HIGH JUST A FEW MONMTHS AGO, WHERE IS THE FUCKING BOUNCE AND SHORT SQUEEZE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>53440807
Not cool.

>>53440979
Gary says 1.50 and if you look at the chart it shows that's possible.

>>53441612
GOD PLEASE NO

>>53439372
I'm convinced we need DoD funding and politicians to gut the NRC for the ball to ever get rolling. SMR is cool tech but too many people are invested in the energy shitshow that already exists.

>>53441794
two reactors are already planned in the US, one is already broken ground on as well. The tech is coming but yes, it will probably need DoD funding to get the ball really rolling.

https://www.juniorminingnetwork.com/junior-miner-news/press-releases/1447-tsx-venture/ccw/135089-canada-silver-cobalt-releases-silver-assay-of-29-165-g-t-850-oz-ton-from-concentrate-of-castle-mine-waste-rock.html

one quick link for the evening. That is an incredible amount of silver in waste rock. I imagine that grades not going to be consistent so its not that interesting, but its really odd to see those sorts of results in mill waste. The mill must have just been dumping concentrates out the tail end, heavies everywhere without worry.

>>53442099
Yeah but that company has really nuggety grades they were releasing meters of dusters with .03m of 20,000gpt. Little nuggets surrounded by nothing but country rock lol

>>53442148
yep i remember, and i even bought a chunk of ore from a similar mine to this as its utterly stunning material. Incredible looking ore, but far to nuggety to make it work in the modern world. You cant make a consistent grade with these numbers. Looking at the mine their working on from the photos on their website, you can see the old timers drove the adit being rehabbed right on the vein, working above and below with stopes. I think there were 2 visible paralleling veins in the photos i ll look later. Its really neat to see mineralization like that, but good luck making it work with how we mine now. Their right about the tailings and waste rock though, that stuffs already been upgraded, they could in theory mine that material for some easy money.

>>53440807
Meds

>>53433579
The management is shit but if you have experience swinging explorers based on drill results theirs lots of upside.

>>53440979
You were warned repeatedly dude

heres a cutesy image i mocked up comparing the holdings of three hydrogen tech etf’s. the ones highlighted in green are held across all three, the ones highlighted in yellow are held by two of the three.

essentially it seems that the commonly held ones are big market cap western corps, whilst the the one-offs are eastern industrials which are difficult to buy. the one in the middle, global x hydrogen etf, seems to be the mostly vertically minded, as it also includes a few end-market motor companies (toyota, cummins, nikola). in a nascent industry, is it better to buy vertically like this? or focus on buying into the infrastructure primarily?

this is my first attempt at researching market trends im sure you can tell. should i be looking for the tickers in these holdings which will be carrying the rest? or should i look outside these groups entirely for low-cap dark horse tickerswhich will unexpectedly take off as a result of the industry?

not looking for a handout, just a push in the right direction

I had a dream last night that BLLG hit 12c again so I could slurp.

shill me some stinky wet dirty filthy mining companies
minimum price $0.12 and they pay a dividend

>>53444582
>spoonfeed me
>share price matters
>coomer anime
don't forget to kys on the way out

WE ARE MOONING BOYS!!!

>>53444796
Wake me up when it's above $50.

>>53444469
That question more friends on what kind of investor you are. If you're lazy then just throw money into the etf and forget. But if you like doing research and keeping up with company/sector news and like building your own pf then research individuals. I myself was looking at plug and bloom the other day because I'm a nerd that plays Vidya and I like the idea of picking my characters

>>53444582
Daily reminder to "shill me" fags ...

Will nat gas be above 3 by march?

>>53444846

looks like i will have to do the research anyway because i also want to include vanadium in my portfolio but there’s no etf for that

you KYS you fucking cunt just trying to see if I missed any opportunities. go fuck yourself btw cunt

>>53445300
You did miss an opportunity
But I won't tell you what it is
Use the archive and read the last 7 threads. It's there
Think ten gallon hat

>>53445300
>gets called out as a leech
>gets mad
You missed a lot, and you'll miss more because you rely on others which is why you'll end up as a bagholder lmao

>>53445336
Why you gotta let the cat outta the bag like that?

>>53444930
Just because someone shills a stock doesn't mean someone will buy it, it just means that you can look further into it. All I'm saying is does anyone have any recommendations if you don't them why assume I've done 0% dd on picks, I want to not to miss any opportunity. But if your so uppity about giving out information then go fuck yourself I have my own picks thank you. Way to jump to conclusions asshole

>>53445300
Sorry but you're in the wrong here. We're starting to get daily shill me posters that want to read the benefits of our research and be spoonfed. Which is an even greater offense when you can literally use the fucking archive and see what exact stocks we've been talking about for months.

>>53445416
Post DD and front hole with timestamp and dragon dildo

>>53445438
okay sorry will not do again, I have lots of WPM been buying since April last year, I like royalty streaming stocks mostly

>>53445416
>does anyone have any recommendations
You'll be the first to bitch and complain when those shilled names take a dump.
Get fucked.

>>53445416
>All I'm saying is does anyone have any recommendations
Yes. Lurk moar and find out, or read the archives.
>why assume I've done 0% dd on picks
Because you share none of it and instead ask to be spoonfed like a faggot
>I want to not to miss any opportunity
>>>>>>I want money
no shit retard, that's what all the "shill me" posters want. What makes you any different? Other than baseless claims of having done DD at some point

>>53445528
again your assuming just because someone shills something it gets bought

>>53445577
>Nooooooooooo
>It mooned and you guise left me out
Or
>Nooooooooooo
>It tanked and you guys told me to buy it

I suggest you buy rope and borrow a chair

>>53445625
likewise friendo

>>53445577
>your
"Shill me" indicates that you want the gains with no work.
Maybe share your expert DD or lurk moar, as others have stated, before coming here to demand tickers.
Why the fuck would I spend scores of hours every month researching companies just to provide that DD to lazy cunts looking for a quick buck?
Do what >>53445625 suggests.

>>53445416
All this time whining when you could be researching

>>53445577
You're assuming anyone here wants to help you make money

>>53445482
Simp.

Is this smg calibre posting?

>im sorry guys I actually do like mining. I bought wpm and stuff? NOW can u gimme the recommendations?

Gross. Have some self respect. Get the fuck out. Go back to smg fag. We do actual research here.

>>53445528

>>53445482

Welcome to our yard motherfucker. We're hard here lol. Motherfucking SAVAGES lol.

>>53445482
Stick around and maybe you'll learn something faggot. Then one day you can be the one shitting on newfags.

If not then fuck off back to smg or crypto or whatever other gay investment you gravitate towards.

You're welcome for the time. The time spent replying to you I mean. Our valuable time. You're welcome

Source energy services up 8% today
71% above my entry price

>>53445577
Ok, you're checked, you've convinced me to give up my top pick.
There's a little company based out of Thailand that has a secret silver mine in Oregon. Nobody knows about it. It has the highest grade silver in the world. They've been quietly building a state of the art processing facility and will start shipping out ore concentrates in two weeks. The CEO is an expert in mining and, unlike other mining executives, he never lies or misleads his shareholders. They are literally sitting on $69,987,123,654,150 worth of silver and it's trading for pennies.
I suggest you hurry up now and buy a boatload before everyone jumps on this moonshot. Go into debt to buy shares. Believe me, it will be worth it. Just hurry up and buy, buy, buy!

>>53445844
Congrats bro, it's kicking ass lately. I should have bought some after all your sandposting. Good pick.

>>53445857
There's always fucking one who caves and gives the gems away to newfaggots

morning all have some news!
https://www.mining.com/web/south-africas-blackouts-threaten-platinum-supply-in-top-miner/

https://www.mining.com/fortuna-silver-granted-provisional-injunction-to-operate-san-jose-mine-under-12-year-eia-terms/

Gary is saying to leveraged on silver and that it will break to the upside.

Santacruz silver yearly production report released.

>>53448145
https://www.juniorminingnetwork.com/junior-miner-news/press-releases/569-tsx-venture/scz/135159-santacruz-silver-reports-2022-full-year-record-production-of-15-010-871-silver-equivalent-ounces.htmlg42rj

>>53448118
Mfw

I'm too tempted to average down into trillion.

>>53433275
depends who you bought and when
t. guy who bought both PureGold and Aurcana

>>53447196
Isn't it something like 80% of global platinum production stems from Russia and south Africa?

>>53434978
>They are worthless unless they're on moex
Guess I'm fucked then.

Picrel is some stocks to be cautious of or completely avoid. This is from a Discord group whose owner is paid by companies to pump their turds.

>>53449577
>Vulcan Salt
kek that's somewhat unsurprising. I remember when Atlas was on its run to $4 they were constantly being shilled as "just like Atlas, but cheaper!" and a bunch of shit star wars memes.
Admittedly I never looked into them but now that they can't ride the Atlas hype they all seem to have vanished. I don't think I've seen them mentioned once all Winter.

>>53449577
Only thing I'll say against this list is fission 3.0. I was here the day their news was posted and it did a 4x. I even shilled it to an anon and got him a bag lol

>>53449338
its mostly south africa lately, russia's mines are really nuggety if my memory serves.

>>53449949
Fission 3.0 has predatory and terrible management but it isn't an outright scam like the others on that list.

>>53449577
Determining who the promoters are of a company has a significant influence on whether or not I buy. For example, if Allan Barry Laboucan (Rocks & Stocks) or Mike Coyle (Inside Exploration) are involved, then I'm not likely to buy. They are useful as a filter since they have no problems with pumping dog shit companies. The same goes for the owner of this Discord group.

>>53440979
Any nat gas companies you can recommend? Your cry for help is kinda bullish to me.

>>53449577
Salt and Vulcan are legit, look at management. And we should have a pretty good idea just how big Salt will be very soon with the PEA release

>>53440219
I’ve mentioned it in threads last year, but Russia is well underway in developing on-board mini nuclear fission reactors that power icebreaker ships, which can also be formed into flotillas that will temporarily chill at the docks for a set amount of time and provide power for energy intense mining operations in the unforgiving upper reaches of their geography.

The US Dept of Energy has taken note of Russia’s leadership in this space and is beginning to dole out grants for similar projects in America. Nuclear Armistice treaty expires in 2026..

Of course the world hasn’t always been so hostile, especially in the case of nuclear innovation. It was the Russians that initially created the tokamak, which has been instrumental thus far in fusion research. We currently have a host of countries (including Russia and the west) that are all working on magnetic fusion reactions in France.

Really good listen here for anyone that wants to learn about fusion:

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/lex-fridman-podcast/id1434243584?i=1000595885259

>>53453235
yep Russia and before them the USSR was using mini reactors to power all sorts or stuff, from lighthouses, weather stations, military outposts and even a couple small towns. They had the right idea when it came to remote power.

commoditieschads we just keep winning, how could this be?

>>53453790
I'm up 1.9% today. About 5% on the week.
About 18.5% in a 3m.
Really hoping something gives should we see gold break out

Any fertilizer chads in here? Been buying up UAN the last few weeks whenever I have some extra money to throw in. Think it's a pretty good short term play since Spring is coming soon and long term those dividends look juicy.

>>53453920
Gary is saying to take light leverage on silver and he wouldn't be saying that if it wasn't meaningful. He's saying a move to thirty followed by a correction and then fifty. If silver goes to fifty we could take an easy 300% on our mining stocks.

>>53454132
Uan is a good stock and my go to fertilizer but I'm out of it right now.

>>53454179
Holy shit $50 silver would eradicate crypto

>>53454189
What's got you out of it? From it's chart, Im of the opinion that now is about a good a time as any to get in.

BCs 8 up and and coming mines worth 4.9 Billion dollars. I am thrilled to see these projects coming along!
https://www.mining.com/eight-new-mines-or-expansions-in-british-columbia-worth-4-9-billion/

Is anyone buying or just holding? If buying what sector, are PMs priority it seems?

>>53454691
Holding what I already own and doing some selective buying in microcap PM explorers. Flipping forex in the evenings for shits and giggles.

>>53454875
hey that's cool. what's pacta got to do with those 'girls'?

>>53454924
https://www.pactarelations.com/

>>53454691
Both. Hoping for a pull back but I've been consistently wrong about a lot of the feds moves for months now so I e accepted the clown planet will only get clownier
So I'll just buy and hold until the clownularity is met at the event horizon

>>53454179
>>53454192
Where do you suppose Hecla, Impact and Guanajuato would be with $50 silver? They are $6.37, $0.28 and $0.30 right now.

>>53454179
>If silver goes to fifty we could take an easy 300% on our mining stocks.
that's it? a measly 3x?

>>53455281
I don't own any silver miners at least not that I'm aware of. I'm liking nickel copper and cobalt . I hold silver but only physical
The majors in silver are too big for my liking and the upward potential of other industrial metals is greater I think

>>53454691
I'm also thinking about shorting this.

>>53454179
>$50 silver
you don't mean oz. do you? i was thinking
>$15 silver
hike gold up like %20

Hey lads, I'm fucking around with excel and tracking correlation between different assets. So far I have most PMs and indices and countries done (where ETFs exist). What are some tickers that are representative of these different assets?
>Coal
>Iron ore
>Nickel
>Lithium
>Cobalt
>Zinc
>Lead
>Aluminium
>Water
>Salt
>Agri

For example, I know coal doesn't really have an etf and there's like 5 or 6 companies that all move together, such as Whitehaven. What about shit like water, salt, and fertilizer? Ideally I'd have an index or basket to track instead of individual equities

>>53455514
Brave. Don't go crazy

>>53455367
its always better to have low expectation. However, you can easily have x5 at Silver 50$ imo.

>>53454179
>>53455367
>>53455899
As far as I'm concerned $50 silver would be so monumental that it would be hard to predict how much miners could run up. I know that in principle it's always good to be conservative with your expectations and not hype up huge multipliers like the crypto side of /biz/ always does, but in the case of unironic $50 silver, if we factor in not just the implications this would have on profit margins but also the unimaginable amounts of money that would be rolled over into silver during the run-up due to hype and FOMO, we could genuinely see 2021 binance shitcoin casino level gains in the mining sector.

Of course this is all just theoretical, in practice anything you buy will print even at $30 silver, the trick is doing your research and trying to find out what will print the most and that is often based more on luck than anything else.

>>53455899
Also, checked.

>>53455942
I completely agree, I just don't wanna give wrong moon idea to people. They only need to understand you will make tons, real tons, of money when we break 30 to 50. To be completely open, I'm pretty sure I'll 10x easily. On my 13 positions, they're all sub 40 MC but only 2 (Guanajuato at 120 and Irving at 80).

I'm currently thinking about selling my KTN (up 50%) to double my BIG position (which was confirmed a good play by the last NR this week).

>>53455942
>we could genuinely see 2021 binance shitcoin casino level gains in the mining sector.
I'm cumming bros

>>53455973
Can you please list your positions and while you're holding each one? Uhhh thanks.
I also have Irving.

I hate reddit but I am so glad this sub exists now. I remember when it was just 5k or so like over a year ago.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Wallstreetsilver

When silver starts it's real run up, this sub is going to go ballistic and the rest of investors on reddit will dogpile on it.
I'm so glad I'm early.

>>53455367
Thats conservative friend. Trying to be conservative. GSVR management IIRC has even said that their own company is a 3-5x at $30 silver.

>>53455235
The fed just does what the market prices in. Weve learned that over the past two years. Congratulations, you now have cheat codes and can see the future.

>>53455514
Jesus here we go again lol. Are you nat gas bro? Member we told you not to touch the stove? lol

>>53455601
Water trades with PHO i believe.


>>53455942
Gary says bubble phase will happen this year. If I interpret correctly within the next three months.

Gas prices jumped from 3 dollars to 350 in January. This will increase inflation number and fed won't be able to raise rates. Couple of observations and thoughts....

1. Markets will panic again upon report of high inflation and dump gold (lol) because they think this means fed will raise rates due to high inflation print.

2. Fed will not be able to raise rates much higher, consensus us after the next two .25bps we are done.

3. This could be the start of the next inflationary wave that sends commodities higher.

4. That smug nigga Andy said two years ago that inflation comes in three waves. First is housing, then energy, then gold. If gold goes up this year then that theory is confirmed. Not only that but Andy has said and I agree that this three year cycle (of housing then energy then gold) will be a minor three wave cycle within a larger one. (Understand what I'm saying?) I can draw a picture if needed.

4. When the market realizes that inflation is going up and the fed can't raise rates (I'd put this prediction about four months out) you will see an absolute crap puke of the markets into gold. Gold will go higher than 2300.

5. We are the best board on biz. The most intelligent and open minded thinkers. The rest of the board is retarded children and normies at best. Smg has some okay degenerates.

6. I am bullish AS FUCK on silver right now. I am feeling it. Not talking about fundamentals which we already know but I can feel it in my balls. Year of the rabbit starts soon, last year was year of the tiger and everything was fucked. Year of the rabbit is supposed to be calm with good steady gains. I have followed Chinese lunar since covid year of the rat and they have been pretty accurate.

>>53456440
>>53455367

>>53456454
>Are you nat gas bro?
No, I'n the KOLD fag.

>>53457053
Using cash cost when calculating "profit" is pretty dishonest. Their all in cost is much, much higher. These calculations also never seem to include tax on profits. Isn't like half their aueq production other metals than silver?
>>53455281
Impact is already priced for $50 silver.

uRanium

>>53457652
Glad someone isn't taking the bait. Their AISC is more around 20ish. From their 3M AgEq production, only 450k is really Silver. Taxe on profit is hard to know.

I'm still heavily invested in them because they're a quality producer. A must own in my opinion.

>>53455806
>Brave
Not really. The history of commodity trading is littered with bubbles. Lithium isn't rare, but has supply issues that will eventually catch up with demand. The market is now oversaturated with Lithium names and the sentiment remains high. The biggest question for me in shorting lithium is timing.

>>53458177
... just to illustrate my point about oversaturation of lithium companies, as soon as I finished typing my post, I saw this puff piece "news."

>>53458256
>esg-mandated
>advance adoption of electric vehicles
>forefront of a new era of mining by looking at everything but copper
Into the trash it goes.

More hydrogen sector news
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2023/01/25/nikola-to-run-hydrogen-production-fuel-cell-truck-stations-under-hyla-brand/?sh=150496726125

Shit really is daily at this point...

I was rewarded for averaging down into trillion.

>>53456650

SALT PEA WHEN

>>53459849
soon i hope, i’ve been averaging down all week

uranium bros ww@??

>>53459582

Yeah it's coming pretty strong now and there aren't that many companies to throw money at.
This is about as ground level as it's going to get with this stuff. Companies have fallen nicely from their first hype cycles too.

I really wonder about Nikola as a company though.
From what I recall they basically bullshitted about having an electric truck and collected a fuckload of money from institutional investors.
Then it turned out they were collecting the money and only hoped to create the product afterwards. Their electric truck was just an empty shell they rolled downhill on video and claimed it was a working product.
Now they're making promises about hydrogen. I'd take anything these guys say with a large spoonful of salt.

I looked at some of these other companies and Ballard Power seems like an interesting option.
They already have working products on the market and they're developing fuel cells with ABB for the marine industry.
They also recently partnered up with Adani to develop a system for mining trucks.
Ballard seems to be going for the heavy vehicles and transportation industry along with the infrastructural side with renewables. Basically focusing on all of the right things.
Worth checking out, a lot of very big things in the pipeline for these guys.

https://www.ballard.com/about-ballard/newsroom/news-releases/2023/01/17/ballard-announces-project-with-adani-to-develop-a-hydrogen-fuel-cell-truck-for-mining-transportation
https://new.abb.com/news/detail/88060/abb-and-ballard-reach-milestone-toward-fuel-cell-powered-marine-transport
https://www.ballard.com/about-ballard/newsroom/news-releases/2023/01/23/ballard-announces-order-from-crosswind-to-supply-fuel-cell-system-for-1-mw-stationary-power-project

>>53460111
Thanks for the info. I was personally taking a look at plug power. They seem to be a must have. I'll look more into Ballard. They sound interesting.

>>53460111

isnt this adani group the same one getting exposed for massive fraud right now?

just leaving this here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4e0Vz0niEE

>chevron buying back 75 billion in stock
The gas stock bullrun is fake but I'm not asking questions.

>>53460281

Top kek, judging by that -18% plunge I'd say this is them.
Looks like it's some accounting fraud those poos have pulled off. They can't help themselves, scamming is in their genes.
I expect we'll see plenty of stuff like this come out now that things aren't just going straight up anymore.
It's easy to bullshit about things when everything is in the green, but it's an entirely different game to keep the scams going when markets take a huge dump.

>>53460410
oil (wti) will reach $150 this summer

>>53460766
Care to explain the sentiment behind this? I'm not a holder of coal/oil and don't keep up with the macro.

>>53460025
Hopefully fireworks next week after new URA inclusions of SPUT and FUU go live.

>>53460929
severe underinvestment in production and exploration, depleted strategic reserve and of course war

Source energy services up again today
Another 8%. 52 week high

Natgas sisters

>>53445776
Learn what? these threads are mostly about having a laugh. This is not the place to be if you want to progress your skill if you value your time you daft cunt

>>53461299
I learn and laugh
Sorry to hear you can only do one at a time
>1pbtid
Ah I get it now...

moar BRICS hopium

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/economy/russian-fm-says-brics-group-to-consider-common-currency/2797085

>>53461420
>Hopium
It's part of the agenda. Basel III is coming

>>53455601
Well you've probably missed a good start for nearly everything on that list apart from agri. Salt, coal and water i'd prob go physical.

What's this pattern called?

>>53461299
That's what you think but meanwhile some of us have learned life-changing skills. Glad you're having a laugh though. I think family guy is on. You can go watch that and have a laugh too. Might be more of your level

Peeps seem to think coal will smash it but won't the thermal just get replaced with natty? ive been coal since a couple of years ago and i don't see a great upside atm. Natty looks like the new coal imo.

>>53461800
The gas is looking on the edge. Could either crash 30% imo or pump. Lithium was doom and gloom 4 weeks ago but went up. Is this a shake out or is there actually a chance gas is fucked for a decent amount of the year?

GoGold's hit the all time record for an Ag intercept on MinerDeck

i want had to go to 2, or even 1.50 like gary said. i cant think of a better entry than this

>>53462242

*gas

>>53462154
Fuck it, got to trust your self with big boy decisions, will be waiting to buy high listening for others advice. But if someone had a good argument why gas is fucked will love to read it tomo. Play hard and get home safe

>>53462242
What's a good few companies worth looking into? I'll check the archives later. Driving just now

Prospera bros...

>>53463695
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/01/25/2594866/0/en/Prospera-Energy-Inc-Announces-Private-Placement.html
This news was 3 days ago. I'm guessing it was already priced in?

>>53460929
Capital expenditure in the sector has been dead since 2015 and most of the marginal growth worldwide has been in shale which requires cheap money to constantly replace wells which decline rapidly. The idea was that since new conventional production has only offset declines in conventional production since around 2006, that the slowing growth on these shale assets would cause a supply crunch, especially as emerging economies in India and elsewhere continue to grow.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/biden-admin-issues-20-mining-225350810.html

>>53463971
So is prospera a good company to look into? I'm reading their operations now but I don't see whether they do shale based or not.

>>53463425
Blue lagoon and encore energy

>>53464946
I mean for natgas

Natty investors at $8 gas:
>Hedges? Boo! Hiss! What is this nonsense!
Natty investors at $3 gas:
>Why didn't they hedge when they had the chance.
>I've had it with this management.

>>53465245
You're answer is literally in this thread dude just scroll up lol...

>>53465339
Yeah I've read this thread. I read every thread. I've been here since these threads started. I'll just use the archives when I get off the highway
Whichever ones are talked about most I will avoid like the plague

>>53465753
>What are good companies worth looking into
>Whichever ones are talked about most I will avoid

So what? Are you looking for companies that are only mentioned once or twice? cause Blue lagoon is talked about daily and its about to do a 2x. Your logic makes no sense.

>>53465835
I was unaware bllg was into natgas
News to me

>>53465835
>2x
So you mean you're going to break even from when you bough last April?

>everything but commodities mooning
LMAO, how before the cope that 2024 will be the year?

>>53465984
Right im sure you were only talking about natgas when you made that "ill avoid" statement. And you didn't answer my question. Are you only looking for companies that are mentioned once or twice per thread or something? Your logic still doesn't make sense and Trillion has been shilled here and is doing fairly well.

>>53465984
I don't hold blue lagoon.

>>53466172
What was your question?
My bad on bllg.

>>53466172
PS, i know nothing about trillion or any energy company.

>>53466172
I'm over here. We use ids on this website
Each poster has a unique user id assigned to them so we don't get confused.
Yes, to answer your question simply.
Since I don't invest in energy I'm well outside the loop. So I would use any tickers to scour the archives to see how many times it's mentioned
>Bhs: 6 gorillion results
>Bllg: 6 gorillion results
This lets me know magnitudes of order more useful information than any information about the company from any source anywhere ever. Huge difference between "shill me x" and "provide tickets for me to research myself"
Should be easy enough but this is why I don't touch energy outside of oilfield services; it's too volatile for me and it's full of incompetent nigger loving dick fiends that can't even into furchinz

Have a lovely weekend anon. Bayhorse will moon right before blue laggard in two more weeks. The DD has all been done by silvermineranon and he's never wrong

>>53461527
>Good start
That's okay, I'm not trading them at the moment. I still need to get my TA into a workable system. Mostly, the correlation is interesting to me because that means I can pick optimum exposure, and avoid assets that overlap. Eg, it's like when trading forex you wouldn't go CADUSD and CHFUSD because you'd have twice as much risk in one category.
Interesting, copper is correlated to some SA countries, presumably due to mining companies. SOYB has basically no correlation with SPY, for example.

>>53456460
Thanks, there was another one too I think, but I'll take a look
etfdb is a good resource for me, too

>>53466172
>you made that "ill avoid" statement
You got the wrong guy, ace.

https://www.juniorminingnetwork.com/junior-miner-news/press-releases/2182-tsx-venture/gpg/135256-grande-portage-resources-releases-results-from-2022-herbert-gold-project-in-s-e-alaska.html

Never a good sign when a company releases drill results late Friday night lol, those are some sad intercepts. But they probably have enough resources for a mine already.

>Penny stock (a) needs to raise capital at a higher price -or- (b) a large shareholder (associate of management) needs to ditch his bags
>Penny stock signs contract with an promotional firm
>Promotional firm subs out work to social media "influencers" (picrel)
>"Influencers" claim to have bought the stock and tell followers how great it is
>Retailers who follow "influencers" buy the recommendation
>Share price rises and (a) company can raise at a higher price -or- (b) large shareholder can transfer his bags
>Job done and share price fades. New baggies are born
What have I missed here?

>>53466380
>Those eyes
Is she looking at the camera or for the camera?
Imagine dating this chick, never being able to see eye to eye...
And you know she'd be seeing someone on the side

That's it for me ladies and gentlemen. You've been a lovely audience. Don't drive drunk and don't forget to tip your waitress
I'll be a the crazy horse saloon with a different act next weekend so bring the family

>Penny stock (a) needs to raise capital at a higher price -or- (b) a large shareholder (associate of management) needs to ditch his bags
>Penny stock signs contract with an promotional firm
>Promotional firm subs out work to social media "influencers" (picrel)
>"Influencers" claim to have bought the stock and tell followers how great it is
>Retailers who follow "influencers" buy the recommendation
>Share price rises and (a) company can raise at a higher price -or- (b) large shareholder can transfer his bags
>Job done and share price fades. New baggies are born
What have I missed here?

>>53466314
Then why ask for natgas? Trillion is really the only natgas co. I've seen shilled here and it goes against your logic. I don't hold bayhorse either lol. Why do people assume so much.

>>53466445
Why not? It's not like I'm gonna know the tickers by heart. And we all call companies by different names and abbreviations, slurs, etc. Natgas taking a beating may not be a bad thing. Buy when there s blood in the streets.
Do you wanna buy the 52 week high or the 52 week low?

>>53466476
I mean sure. I was just wondering what your view is on company thats shilled here thats doing well. But if you're willing to buy when its down then I guess that answers my question

God I'm slow, just realized something
>crypto needs decentralized validators for the blockchain
>CBDCs are due to roll out in March
>most of the current validators are in China
>in theory they can do a 51% attack to change the blockchain history
>CBDCs are just the US's way of controlling the economy instead of chinkland

Also has anyone ever looked into SDRs (special drawing rights)? It's a basket of currencies that has been proposed several times to be the unit that international trades are settled in, rather than USD

>>53467378
I've been telling you guys this exactly for like 3 years now

>>53467581
rothbard based

>>53467674
>>53467674

>>53467715
reminder to join the austrian econ discord server if you haven't already anon
I think it's one of the biggest if not the biggest econ discord server at this point
kUr7pG6Q

Something interesting I noticed is that when gold does well, USDJPY and USDCAD tend to do poorly. Do the three countries have some kind of economic circlejerk, or do people get spooked if asian markets do badly?

>>53467581
I'm not claiming to be a smart guy; I only heard about CBDCs in the last few months, but I had that realization on my own after doing a bit of research. I think the most interesting aspect is that it seems to be a controlled demolition to fuck over Chinese power. Does that mean India would become the new manufacturing hub, or would Mexico?

>>53467845
You are looking at gold in USD, so it's pretty natural that when the USD loses value against other currencies, it does poorly vs gold too.

>>53467842
I'm on enough watchlists
>>53467845
What he said >>53468037
But also the special drawing rights are already the world currency and have been for decades. This is where things seem to be somehow never properly "priced in" in an Austrian viewpoint until you take the thesefuckingkikeswantyoudead pill.
Then, suddenly, things like laundering, trafficking, arms deals, fucking wars, bribery, blackmail, and everything grotesque and unholy become a significant portion of what's not properly "priced in" like your typical subsidies and tax breaks, etc.
If the love of money is the root of all evil then what is the root of all money?
>Picrel
Thru the looking glass...?

Figured I'd make a new one before bed
>>53468240

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/McCormack%E2%80%93Dickstein_Committee

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Dodd

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vftIcEis7uI

>>53454132
I'm in it and been in it.

>>53464946
Funny how you're trying to troll a shill me fag but you don't realise BLLG will unironically melt faces.

>>53469453
How many more weeks? I'm dying to know
Where did the thread learn about this magnificent investment opportunity?
Wow!!!
Are there any more investment opportunities like this?!!!111!
What I'm looking for is a small silver mine in Oregon that's run from a ladyboy brothel in Thailand but they have to have a world class ore sorter, a rugged, loveable cowboy hat wearing ceo with a Canadian accent and a mining permit