/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53394025
wow what a groundbreaking thread

>*rumbles ominously*

>>53394025
if he was satoshi he would dump btc and not link...oh wait

>>53394025

Plenty of evidence

>>53394420
Also the Lex Friedman video where he outright is asked if he is or knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is and then conveniently taps out "SN" in Morse code while saying he doesn't know who that is kekek.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4Ex4lsYZDUxA/

>>53394420
does anyone else find it odd that biz has essentially uncovered that SN = SN and yet you don't hear a peep about it outside of this board?

>>53394543

My brother in Christ are you a bot? Kek

I've never seen ANYONE post that meme and I'm ecstatic because I'm the one who fucking made it like over 2 years ago kekekek

As far as your question goes its hard to know how the information didn't escape the boards but I was in the original thread where the info was being discussed and that infograph you replied to was posted.

The thread was deleted and if you even commented in the thread you were banned for a week. I kid you not the reason for the ban they claimed was fucking "doxxing".

Meanwhile /biz had like 3-5 "Craig Wright" is Satoshi threads going at any given time and they were never pruned for "doxxing" kek. At that moment I was never more sure in my life LINK was the project to be invested in because the info surrounding Sergey and Satoshi connection was being actively being hidden while threads about others being Satoshi were not.

Idk if Sergey himself truly is Satoshi or if he was part of a group that all operated under the moniker but there is more evidence he is SN than anyone else.

>>53394420
Take this down stupid fuck

>>53394678
>>53394443
2 more weeks you skitzo fucks are beyond delusional, get a life. Go outside talk to someone it might help

>>53394743
>>53394770

I hope you realize your extreme reaction only serves to amplify and verify the validity of my posts among lurkers and others who are reading it as opposed to discrediting me or the information.

You are legit just screeching and calling me a schizo instead of even trying to dispute my posts.

If you are paid for your services they should fire you.

>>53394678
not a bot, just an anon who finds it interesting how truths are consistently discovered on this board that take years to flow out into public consciousness. maybe Sergey is not Satoshi but the evidence is very compelling and worth discussing. also great meme.

>>53394420
wasn't the smartcontract domain name part disproven? wasn't the domain shown to have been acquired by serget at a later date, and not actually created by him in 2008?

>>53394946
I think reasonable doubt was found also regarding something with his mother
It’s pretty crazy though that Ari created proof of work and when people speculate about who Satoshi is, neither of them ever come up

If Sergey was Satoshi he would have been fucking around rugging people on the NXT dex in 2014 with the help of him and Steve's front end SecureAE.
If Sergey has any sort of claim to crypto history it might be him being the first one to pull actual rugs in the sense of 'pulling liquidity on a dex' type of definition.
Maybe he was BCNext and doing a flawed PoS coin to set up his future rug pulls or something if you want to go down the 'anonymous founder who disappeared who was Sergey' route.
Although that was possibly CfB up there from the pic, probably not though but who knows.

>>53394025
there is evidence that he's a retard but biz is even dumber for taking the bait

>>53394808
sneed

>>53394972
he didn't create proof of work, just coined the term

>>53394972
>It’s pretty crazy though that Ari created proof of work
Link?
There are so many bits and pieces of all of this that were incrementally created over like 20 years preceding the og whitepaper. So it's hard to say x created y since it depends on the context.
Like Adam Back's Hashcash is fairly close to the mining function/PoW in Bitcoin. What and when was Ari's contribution and why is it more impactful for that part than Hashcash? Was he referenced in the whitepaper?(he might be, I just don't recall off the top of my head desu)

>>53395013
>>53395029
Seems I was a bit off. Wiki says he and another author coined the term and formalized the process. Seems the idea had already been around but not sure if it had already actually been implemented. This is the key paper apparently.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-0-387-35568-9_18.pdf?pdf=inline%20link

>>53394988
Yeah, Satoshi pivoting to cryptamail or whatever is the best counter argument

>>53395029
He’s not referenced in the bitcoin whitepaper. Would be interesting to see if he’s referenced by any of the works that are.

it seems the real question is not whether he is satoshi but the nature of his relationship with satoshi and how they met

>>53394025
Zero chance

>>53395166
obviously running cover like a true friend

>>53395166
It’s certainly points towards it not being him but I wouldn’t call a potentially aggrieved former acquaintance and business partner a particularly reliable source. Certainly far from 100%

>>53395190
That didnt come across bitter. He was merely telling everyone how he knew Sergey. Alex doesnt come across as a cheap shot guy…

>>53395164
indeed :)

>>53395222
I don’t know him enough but he is running a competing project, no?

>>53395008
not many people understand this reference

>>53395166
"ergo platform"
isnt that run the salty guy who got cucked by charles because ada decided to use link instead?
and iirc he doesnt actually have any code contributions in the github or anything so his only real claim is working on the website which has been overhauled like twice since then

run by*

>>53395166
it's funny, this even reads like the same kind of fud we get here day in day out. really sets the ol noggin joggib

>>53394025
https://twitter.com/c___f___b/status/1011676626684465152

>>53395238
where is that pic of aj from?

>>53395887
i dont know specifically, but its been around for a while. i think it says alot, don't you?

In Japan, Ash is known as Satoshi. But it’s just a scarf.

>>53394025
The only argument against Sergey being Satoshi is that he was too young.
Everything else points to him

sirgay = satoj
check my digits sirs, vishnu confirms

>>53395166
que te parta un rayo

>>53395661
>https://twitter.com/c___f___b/status/1011676626684465152

>>53394025
Get real op, he can't even code

>>53395562
>this even reads like the same kind of fud we get here day in day out
Truth is a fucked up concept. When all truths related to your highly emotional choice of "investment" vehicle give you the same uneasy feeling that you want to dismiss without a second thought, it may be time for you to look a little deeper.

That distinct feeling you get from "fud" isn't part of your mind telling you to double down on your religious faith and dismiss all wrong think; it's part of your mind trying to tell you to make the fuck up.

>>53396853
Well there was that rotschild larp about 18 year old changing the financial system

>>53398250
thanks ranjesh, really thought provoking stuff

>>53398261
>dismissed without a second thought
Of course, how could you be wrong? That's impossible. Clearly I'm a paid Indian fudder, and there's no reason to give any uneasiness a second thought. $1000eoy wagmi

>>53398311
>$1000eoy wagmi
checked. now youre talking

>>53398250
helo ser very thank you warm welcomings from new deli wood you like meet for lunch meeting today? thank you ser you buy me meal with your rupee

>>53398311
checked wagmi

the state of desperate bagholders
>>53398139
>this is truth!!!
>>53395166
>but this is fud!!!!11

>>53396853
Satoshi's commit history shows lots of activity in the summer and less activity in Fall and Winter. A student working on a summer project?

>>53394025
you're correct OP, any oldfag with a shred of common sense knows who the real satoshi is

but sergey may well have interacted personally with him during that time, as the ip address and boat evidence proves

honestly the whole thing just tells me that top levels of elite (very possibly intelligence) were involved from the start. The elite are not one bloc, they have factions.

>>53398439
>Chepurnoy
Kek

>>53398579
>muh Sergey Ivancheglo from IOTA is much more reliable than the literal co-founder of smartcontract.com
lmao

>>53398799
>co-founder of smartconctact.com
He left in 2015 to create a competing product.
Many speculated that he had a falling out with Sergey.
Sergey Ivancheglo was one of the earliest known btc holders

>>53398880
so what? he's obviously in a much better position to offer an opinion about Sergey instead of some random IOTA engineer who happened to be an early adopter as well
you're just using him because he reinforced your delusional narrative once, literally years ago, and then you conveniently disregard an overly negative statement from a person who's been there right from the beginning and actually introduced Sergey to DLT in the first place, the definition of confirmation bias
>but anon, muh early adoopters mean sergey is satoshi!!1

>>53398949
Sergey is Satoshi get over it Thomas

>>53399004
ok hodge

>>53398949
No, the fact that he left in 2015 to work on a competing (failed) product, and that him and sergey likely had a falling out, would give him multiple reasons to distort the truth. Kind of like how he distorts the truth when he calls himself the co-founder of smartcontracts.com (technically true but he had fuck all to do with chainlink’s success)

>>53399127
>the ceo of token dumping is never touch the wallet satoshi regardless of any facts set before me and this also somehow means I made a good investment because non-sequitor
Religion be funny like this...

>>53399156
Try again but in English this time

>>53399205
>my reality denying thought patterns are incomprehensible, even to myself, when laid out in plain language
Nothing to worry about though. I'm just a Bulgarian trying to steal your tokens, right? Easily dismissed, alongside all other reasonable arguments, actual evidence, and piss poor performance solely caused by the token creator constantly dumping while you "never sell".

>>53399127
yes anon, cause when people leave their companies they generally go out of their way to diminish and talk down their former associates
the pattern that constantly emerges here is that literally everyone in the world is out for Sergey's head

>>53399403
That’s literally what he’s doing in that screenshot
>>53399337
I never said any of that. Care to point me to one of those ‘reasonable arguments’, Mr ESL

>>53399630
no, he's simply stating his own opinion about the likelihood of Sergey being Satoshi, and for some reason you choose interpret that as a personal insult against your lord and savior Sergey
to counter that statement, you offer the opinion of a completely irrelevant crypto engineer on an (also) failed project called IOTA
since neither statement can be verified or disproved, at the very least, both statements have the same impact
you choosing to favor the most convenient one, is the definition of confirmation bias

>>53394770
seethe you dumbfuck slave cattle

>>53399691
I posted that screenshot as a reply to someone else posting the cfb twitter post you absolute spaz
>neither statement can be verified or disproved
Finally we agree on something

>>53399740
and you mocked the validity of the opposing statement you hypocrite>>53398579
now shut up and fuck off

>>53399763
I’ve already explained why i mocked the validity of his statement.
I like how you refer to cfb as some “random IOTA engineer” while leaving out his involvement in nxt

>>53399903
chupernoy and sergey were also involved on nxt, guess how that went
confirmation bias: the poster

>>53399911
My ‘confirmation bias’ stems from things like
>>53394420
And
>>53394443
Plus the Ari connection. The swift connection. The WEF connection. The DA/Blythe connection, Sandro Salami. Etc etc etc

>>53400019
>my confirmation bias stems from rampant conjecture and astroturfed breadcrumbs spammed in this board for 3 years
yes, that's my overarching point
you forgot municipal marmalade btw

>>53400052
I would argue that the image linking the ip address to sergey is beyond conjecture

>>53400192
and I would argue it's strictly conjecture

>>53400223
Care to elaborate?

>>53400256
>satoshi nakamoto may have relied on a russian proxy
>may have relied
>may
need I go on?

>>53400019
What’s the DA/Blythe connection? That Blythe masters foot massage pic?

>>53400707
it doesn't matter, it flopped couple of months ago
so much for muh DA connection

>>53399012
Absolutely punchable

>>53398565
Satoshi IS Sergey Nazarov. What is this nonsense about Sergey having interacted with Satoshi. If you were really an old fag as you say you would know SN=SN. Look up Sergey's quora post on Kokichi Mikimoto and man made pearls. Sergey (Satoshi) made man made gold (bitcoin), which is better than natural gold because it is easily divisible, has a better stock to flow ratio, is easily transferred and stored, etc. Also consider that Satoshi Nakamoto is an amalgam of Sergey Nazarov and Kokichi Mikimoto. I will give you 8/10 for the subtle misinformation though, you blended truth and lies quite well.