/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53132144
>Why does no one care about chainlink?
There are around 15 active chainlink threads on this board at any given time. People are paid to post negative and positive sentiment about chainlink here.

>>53132144
Link maxis care about link and their 1 or 2 partnerships they had once.

>>53132144
What are origin proofs

>>53132339
I’m talking about crypto space in general, not biz

>>53132339
>>53132360
>>53132371
very organic boys

>>53132387
Thanks buddy. I tried hard.

If someone explains to me why this data Oracle service needs a blockchain let alone a token I will dump 100k into it

>>53132144
The Bulgarians were right

The token isn't needed, it's basically a charity for HR sluts

>>53132144
It's not meant to be cared about
Chainlink was designed to be one of the countless things that work in the background, taking little bits and pieces of each transaction it's involved in.
No one is supposed to notice the 0.01% fee taken each time money or property is moved.
I don't think a bunch of weirdos on 4chan getting obsessed with Chainlink was part of the plan, but it's not going to change anything/

They'll figure out how to vaporize the token holders and continue the service CLL is meant to provide.
How this will happen, I don't know, but I know for certain that holding link isn't going to make ANYONE outside the developers rich

>>53132144
This happens when whales suppress the price to keep retail out. This is the most aggressive campaign I have seen in my 6 years as a linkmarine. The shills truly want to keep LINK out of as many hands as possible.

If you’re wondering where the FUD is coming from it’s cause we’re only months away from the release of CyberCode 2.0 testnet. As an insider, I know have no idea what/the importance of CyberCode 2.0 is gonna be for LINK when the alpha releases around the end of October next year (give or take a few months) so I will spoonfeed you out of kindness of heart:

CyberCode 2.0 secures the ledger cryptographically to encode transactions at 20x magnitude of legacy infrastructure. It achieves this by taking blockchain transactions to the BbC-2022 layer and parsing them through the node network incentivized by super linear sequencing which Sergey said is very close to finish line. This activity is incentivized through semi-permeable staking allowing LINK token holders to benefit for verifying data both on main chain and Blockchain Byzantine Consensus 2022 layer.

The obvious benefits of super fast transaction speeds also brings exponential economies of scale! What this means sir is if farmer has 500 Kg cow for sale, he can put the beast to market on the blockchain to verify the weight in a trust less system faster than global SWIFT system. Soon any business who wants to stay relevant will have to buy LINK to have access to CyberCode 2.0 feature. A unique proposition. Those who don’t use this system (powered by LINK) will get left behind.

Scammer motherfuckers want you to think that banks and other organizations are not currently fulling their bags with cheap LINK as we speak. DON’T LET THEM WIN. If you hold more than 50 LINK right now, you already made it. Immediately when we breach the $6.50 resistance it’ll be too late for you. You have been warned, sir. So go buy many LINK for you dream to come true.

>>53132144
>Why does no one care about chainlink?
If the amount of effort went into shilling link rather than fudding, id already be rich.

>>53132612
You'd be wrong to assume it is strictly shills astroturfing Link here lately. Reality is Nexo/Celsius got bodied pretty hard, and we know that is where a lot of the incentive to actually hire shill farms to fud was coming from because of their leveraged Link positions. You'd do well to remind people of the Zeus Report which really made those connections to fudders undeniable.

The other part of this story;
>Dumb bagholders risked their link on bancor/celsius etc. and got raped, feel like it is Sergey's fault so they can't stop seething
>Linkies continuing to 'fud for fun', while also being impatient faggots who think they deserve something special
>Newfags who just don't get it

just the typical goldfish thinking of this space
at some point in the next year or two chainlink will go on a big run and r edditors will be singing its praises and saying how dumb they are as it's now all so obvious with the number of integrations, the team, and the links to swift
then it will dump again after the hype for a while and people will move onto the next narrative and say how obvious that one was too
the main thing to learn to try and and position yourself for one of these narratives and not fomo in when you hear about it as by then it's too late. you can get rich from just one narrative, two and you can retire. but it takes the ability to research and look ahead and then discipline

>>53134368
yes but none of those integration are going to protect against a coming recession, especially one as big as it seems this one is going to be
in such a macro environment fud on biz or other internet investing places cant be viewed as a reliable counter indicator anymore
now dont get me wrong i am not saying that link will not moon violent, i am saying the next few months will be hard and the starting point of the moon might not be to the liking of most here

>>53134503
Eric Schmidt specifically said that tech/startups operate in a parallel economy. Tech booms are not as beholden to the market at large. We are in our own cycles.

>>53132339
True. Go post a thread with no LINK terms at first and no fud is there. Talk about Chainlink/LINK/Sergey/CCIP and suddenly a bunch of fud posts. It's obvious af.

>>53132339
hold up
people are getting paid for fudding and shilling link???
and im here doing it for free

>>53132339
Fpbp

>>53132339
nobody is paid to fud, it's just a fake product with a fake fatass ceo. russian scammer with a rich daddy that made big bucks in 2017 and doesn't know what to do (because he didn't deserve that money).

Becuase I personally care more about xor and since the world revolves around me that's how things are, sorry anon! We will flip you faggots in time and Sargay will finally retire off all your funds provided to him throughout the years... Sorry...!

>>53132574
>>53132612
>>53134121
>>53134503
why do linkies always feel to copypaste their shit like this everywhere?

>>53132387
The 5/7 LINK daily threads are very organic too yes sar very good. Chainlink marketing department #1 employment option in all of India.

>>53134579
as if flipping link was an accomplishment.

>>53134574
so you're telling me you don't exist? that's crazy

>>53134531
you really think btc decoupled from global liquidity markers already or alternatively link decoupled from btc

>>53134593
you know the fmoc was doing another crush the markets day today right

>>53134679
nice word salad. you read things without comprehending them. you have nothing to offer any discourse. you're retarded. gay.

>>53134541
Yeah i threw
>pic related
at a chart thread yesterday and BANG!!!
Immediately the stock bashers were there replying with the same bullshit...

>>53134697
superb projection, that trick doesnt work here
explain which tech company/start up was decoupled from the economy in 2001?

>>53132386
Actively suppressed; harder to suppress on 4chan so instead it becomes filled with fud and chaos

>>53135069
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nEPWUFgfvk

>>53134531
>Tech booms are not as beholden to the market at large
why not?

>>53132144
>Threads created every hour on /biz/
>No price action
>Why no one like it

The XRP people mainly keep it in their own general threads. What is your problem?

>>53137552
One of my favs, that

>>53132144
its been almost 7 years of chainlink and all you have is staking v0.01

>>53132612
anon, can you give me a qrd on cybercode? i've heard it mentioned but completely forget what the deal is

>>53137869
>almost 7 years
>link ico was sep 2017
Just say over 5 years lol

>>53132612
>>53137894
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=&search_text=cybercode
ok, what the fuck?

>>53137971
anon it's a joke about negro penis

>>53138028
funny

>>53132144
>Why does no one care about chainlink?
Cause it's a piece of shit that doesn't benefit society?

>>53132386
I work in crypto and can tell you from the inside that for better or worse, even crypto native people don't get chainlink still. they bought into the fud memes and think it's poorly designed. they're wrong.

>>53132454
It’s blockchain agnostic and needs a token to be Sybil resistant.

Cryptocurrencies are so cringe like OMG stay away from me you incel freaks. Chad is invested in Open AI and not your weird coins. GROSS!

>>53132144

>>53132144
Holy cope, chainshitters seriously believe there is a global Bulgarian conspiracy involving NEXO to suppress and fud their pre mined erc-20 token

>>53134541
>CCIP

>>53134541
CCIP was supposed to come out in 2022 my man.

>>53132144
I read something about chainlink and zero-knowledge. That's a good one to foster privacy and anonymous transactions.

>>53141252
>Inb4 schizo ramblings

Go off script. Have a little fun.

>>53132386
It's probably the most widely adopted crypto in the space, it just hasn't been monetised yet.

>>53132612
>Immediately when we breach the $6.50 resistance it’ll be too late for you.
Is that your exit price Raj?

>>53141737
>developers posting commits on github means adoption
this is the kind of retardation that allowed that one solana kid to larp as a dozen different teams and account for 40%+ of their ecosystem
it's literally bitcoin-tier mongoloidry. you might as well hold your crypto on a centralized exchange if you're that gullible

>>53132144
>Why does no one care about chainlink?
Its overvalued. Taking 0.01% cuts off of backend transactions is valuable but Chainlink's marketcap is already in the billions leaving it less room to grow. It might see pumps into double digits but its moonbpy days are behind it. Linkshills cope about the markets simply being unaware of Chainlink but in reality the market makers are the only ones that actually bothered pathing out Chainlink's trajectory from here and valued it fairly where it is, meanwhile Linkshills don't do anything but inhale copium

>>53142063
Yea but it’s going to be worth multiple trillions and have 99% of the supply locked up. How do you think this will correlate with token price? Bitcoins history has been a completely new paradigm shift and Chainlinks will be 100x bigger.

>>53138928
>even crypto native people don't get chainlink still
lol is that why half of crypto actively partners with and uses Chainlink?

>>53141712
wow this schizo infographic is really meaningful. Those damn bulgarians!

>>53142116
Kys

>>53132612
First time back to /biz/ in a year and this was hilarious to read. Every 6 months there's a new thing that has everyone hyped about Link. All these buzzwords and anticipation and now the new thing is "dude, have you heard of cybercode 2.0??" "This is it bro!"

>>53142152
That’s an old pasta you retard
>bbc-2022 layer
Cmon anon

>>53142156
Reported for talking about dicks

>>53142092
>have 99% of the supply locked up
this event was supposed to have started last year, but as has been warned about the team did indeed betray very hard and now we have nothing
even worse than nothing with their original timeline its at least 2 years from here before they begin to implement this feature
this is very problematic as it shows they cannot be trusted on deadlines anymore and the supposed launch date is right into the next cyclical peak
so the real fear is that link will miss the next crypto run
anons warned about this for halfa year but were shouted down as bulgarians
nowthat 2023 is here and its worse than imagined via chainlinks own blogposts the board has retreated into total insanity and simply ignores everything that remotely critical despite the communications of the team being absolutely disastrous

>>53144644
same fagging.

>>53142092
>it’s going to be worth multiple trillions and have 99% of the supply locked up
holy cope

>>53144644
>Chainlink staking
>this event was supposed to have started last year
Is this /biz's shittest fudder?

>>53145983
Chainlink labs worst shill

>>53145983
sergeys own statement in jan 2022 and what a disappointment it was

>>53132386
I'll say it once again since you LINK fags are delusional and have a hard time comprehending it

ORACLES ARE NOT WORTH THAT MUCH

Data is valuable, but Chainlink doesn't gather data does it? No, it just takes already existing data from other providers and aggregates it. Chainlink is a midwit token for people who don't understand technology and are wowed by technobabble and big name partnerships. The token doesn't need to be worth more than a few cents to do its job.

>>53132144
>Worst performer in the bullrun
>Only up x50 from ICO 5 (!) years ago (in USD)
>Meanwhile ZERO gains vs BTC/ETH since link mainnet launch
>Gee I wonder why nobody cares about link

>>53144644
>anon spells it out nicely
>immediately schizo link baggies attack him and call him a fudder

like clockwork lmao

token not needed

>>53132574
Is this copy pasta?
Seems like it but I've been here 4-5 years and don't remember this exact text

>>53147017

>>53142092
based. Kys bashers

>>53132144

>>53147520
He just meant that some token is needed, it doesn't need a new token specifically created for it. Might as well use the native coin of the chain you develop on to avoid needless complexity for users. Foisting this onto users was a tradeoff that Sergey made because it allowed him to extract half a billion dollars from retail.

>>53132144
>obviously the next step
if it was that obvious, people would care outside of 4chan

>>53147757
lol
>what is sybil resistance

>>53142281
You literally have NUT in your id faggot

>>53132144
I am not bullish, I am beyond bearish.
Chainlink is a globohomo shitcoin of the highest order and is going straight to zero.
Their days of shitting up biz with their astroturfed psyops are over. They've been found guilty of using DARPA bots, paid shills and sybil attacks to push the WEF agendas, and for that they will pay with their miserable life.
The shills and bagholders will be financially EXTERMINATED and there is nothing they can do about it except watch in horror as it all comes tumbling down. The ride ends here for linkies, the game is over for them.

>>53145096
Just wait

>>53148078
>just wait

>>53148152
The chud in your meme is more of a man than you will ever be.

>>53147017
it's all about collateral
if chainlink protects its moat and ensures that only the link token can be used as collateral then the marketcap can be massive
this was always why chainlink had such a big following back in the day.... but i don't think anyone believed staking would take this long, and it's actually only v1 when the above will start happening
but look at stuff like eigenlayer trying to worm their way into collateral on chainlink. it's a fucking bad idea so should be repelled but yeah, people a lot smarter than the fucking retard i'm replying to have their eye on the game

>>53150374
Well good, because I'm not a man. Nor am I a racist POS.