/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53049745
african insurance crops

>>53049756
A three word sentence and you still fucked it up lmao. The power of ESL.

>>53049769
u got me, superior high iq english speaker. How them bags?

>>53049745

>>53049745
Ccip launch
Deco launch
"Staking has been a resounding success, were going to distribute build assets as follows:"

>>53049745
Beat Chainlink Labs employees, spit on Chainlink Labs employees, humiliate and slander Chainlink Labs employees, throw Chainlink Labs employees into an active volcano, forcibly vaccinate Chainlink Labs employees, rob Chainlink Labs employees of their possessions, spread fake news about Chainlink Labs employees, steal Chainlink Labs employees cars

>>53049797
They're good bro. It's the most important asset in a generation, and I'm thrilled to have 7k of them staked at the ground floor.

>>53049875
>at the ground floor
>dropped 30% since staking released
what did he mean by this?

>>53049745
There won't even be a video, now shut the fuck up about this cursed coin.

>>53049756
I know you’re attempting to fud. But crop insurance is one simple use case for Link just within the insurance industry that will be worth billions alone.

I'll give you a couple of answers I've filtered over the years to be true, from the few times I've gotten a fudder in a rare moment of clarity:

1) Turbo autists who figured out the need for externally connected smart contracts very quickly, and who now seethe at the entire world for failing to understand it like they do. Chainlink is sort of like a metaphor for their general inability to integrate with society, where they are rational and right and it's the world's fault it's so irrational and dumb..
These people fud because in their mind the world should have figured out LINK in 2019 at the absolute latest, but failed to, and so they'll seethe and rage at everyone and everything as a way to express this frustration.

2) People who had LINK stacks but lost them swinging, or gambling, or in a CeFi collapse, or who simply got fudded out of LINK back in 2018 and have been furious ever since. They will never buy LINK because they can't buy it at $0.30 like they had the chance to back then, and then basically rage at people continuing to hold because "if I can't make it then neither can you"

3) People who try to profit off taking an oppositional position to LINK. Usually grifters like the CLCG/Honeycomb/API3 guys, or NEXO, who are charlatan fraudsters and basically parasitic animals to Chainlink just like there are many fraudster teams that are parasitic animals to ETH. They fud because muddying the waters about Chainlink lets them shill themselves, it doesn't go much deeper than that.

4) The seriously mentally ill, like Michael, who also fits in category 2) but has now made a large part of his online identity "being a link fudder" and can't really distance themselves from that because it's the only way they can consistently get attention online, which they crave

>>53049893
Stakelords don't need to check prices any more. We're above that. I might check in 2024. Might not though, don't really need to.

>>53049843
The joke is that we all know this is a joke
Everyone here knows that the chance of this, something good that in a reasonable company would be in the realm of ordinary expectation, will NEVER happen

0 (ZERO) 0 (ZERO) % (PER CENT)

>>53049745
Sergey is going to zero.

"kek baggies"

*Drop mic*